Twin Opposing Vortexes and Misconceptions of Space - See Information in Description

[speedrecovery]

Where would i find more information about "the early life history of a planet from birth" ?? This makes perfect sense to me! when i type that exact phrase into google, nothing about it comes up, just conventional psyence bollix, very strange... i'd love some higher resolution images of those slides, very very interesting...!

[TheRealVerbz2]

@speedrecovery That would be Walter Russell's book called "The Universal One"

He rewrote that which became "A New Concept of the Universe", but all the diagrams are in Universal One.

Check the information in the video description titled "16 Books by Russell".

It links to my Scribd page where I have a lot of material uploaded and dozens of books regarding suppressed research.

Also add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli if you have a page.

I have Very detailed Russell photo album.

:o)

[tweaker1bms]

I'm sorry but I still didn't find an answer to the question I had. If the current model is wrong, why is it so successful? And if this model is correct then how has it been tested, what potential falsifications has it passed, what are its successes outside of possible internal consistency?

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms The suppression of information is why the current fallacies are accepted as true.

Traditions of ignorance & Illusions of observation.

You can look around in Nature on any given scale to validate Walter Russell's work or Tesla.

What in the Universe Ever travels in a straight line like Newton says?

Everything has a rotating frame of reference.

Show me a picture of the nucleus to an atom as Niels Bohr's cartoon shows.

There are no 1 sided coins or singly charged particles.

[tweaker1bms]

@TheRealVerbz2 No modern astrophysicist relies solely on newton for deep space flights though. I'm not sure why you think the scientific community thinks things go in a straight line, this has been done away with ever since Einstein's postulation of the curvature of space. Accounting for gravity's affects is a large part of why astrophysics has been so successful in their programs. (At least in getting things there) Anyone who has been telling you otherwise is simply mistaken.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms I have emails from so called expert astrophysicists saying, "We know exactly what gravity is. Physicists are not interested in alternative ideas." Their pseudoskeptical comments are sad.

Einstein's theories were nonsense and misinterpreted.

Both Tesla and Walter Russell came out the gate proving that with practical applications and logic.

You'd be surprised how many well known Psyentists think those things.

You're wiser then they are and have eyes.

They are Not-Sees.

[tweaker1bms]

@TheRealVerbz2 As far as Neil's Bohr goes, the cartoon is simply meant to be representative, and the cartoon is not all, (for instance now the electron orbits are more like fields or shields) the success of the theory is in it's explaining and predicting the actions of atoms and molecules and the periodic table itself. The mystery of why things have the properties they do is now explained! In fact with it they predicted properties of elements before they were even discovered :)

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms And you're asking the wrong questions.

You should be asking questions regarding the ROOT of how the current models came to be.

Look into the history of suppression and the alternate information offered by the brilliant minds swept under the rug by Psyence.

Many current "laws" are indeed true, but only focus on the outward equations.

Mass = Energy. More Mass = More Energy. That's all the world knows.

But the Inner Atomic ORDER of that same mass dictates ultimate output.

[tweaker1bms]

@TheRealVerbz2 Oh I'm well versed on the history of science... have you taken any such courses yourself? If not I'm sure I can direct you to something online either by a university or The Teaching Company, which proves to be quite enjoyable.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms lol @ universities.

I'll look into the Teaching Company. But if they haven't heard of Walter Russell or Ed Leedskalnin then forget it.

I'm not interested in Lamestream perspectives anymore. I grew up with them.

I pursue the Truth and information that isn't acknowledged, funded or studied.

Everyone has pieces of the puzzle. And most of those pieces are not found in Universities, Libraries or mainstream sources.

The Real enjoyable stuff is self discovery and experiments.

[tweaker1bms]

@TheRealVerbz2 Well, to that end, have you ever considered the possibility that Walter Russell or Ed Leedskalnin might be quacks, or simply have gotten somethings wrong? There might be a reason no one talks of them these days, if just for lack of modern relevancy. You seem to let a lot hinge on their being right, if even the mere lack of mention of them will make you refuse to listen to other scientists.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms LMFAO.

You must not know ANYthing about Ed Leedskalnin or Walter Russell.

Try looking into Coral Castle.

I've given you enough information to research.

Hope you look into it and experiment for yourself.

Take a look at the information in the video description.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms There have been MANY tests to validate this. Look into Tesla, Henry Moray, Ed Leedskalnin, John Bedini, Pier Luigi Ighina, Sympathetic Vibratory Physics, BioGeometry, and all the information in the video description.

Have to spend a few months going through all the material.

It's all about cones, tangential angles, helical trajectories, Phi, and Creating Order out of Chaos.

If there aren't examples in Nature on EVERY scale to validate the models, then it's not true.

[tweaker1bms]

@TheRealVerbz2 These aren't testing models of the solar system though, nor the position of the planets. The only real tests that can be done on that is actually attempting to send things there on those models. We've done this with the current model that you say is wrong. Yet calculated trajectories and programed flight paths have succeeded every time to get ships and probes to their destinations, this is incompatible with the model of the solar system presented above.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@tweaker1bms You need to look into Dewey B Larson's work, Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat and Walter Russell.... Thoroughly.

Take a few months to go over the material.

There's plenty there.

[freepress666]

Hey I get it, what in the hell is CERN doing then. Dan Winter made it clear long time ago.

this video is great, please address my question though,

[TheRealVerbz2]

@freepress666 CERN is wasting Billions of dollars that's what they're doing.

They futiley try to smash together 2 small magnets that want to repel in hopes they can implode them together and create their non existent "god particle."

They think there was some explosion that created ALL matter in the Universe simultaneously. It's absurd.

Everything they view at an atomic scale is a Magnet. There are no singly charged particles. CERN has so many Billion dollar misconceptions it's sad.

[cleogonzalez614]

I want this video on my Toughpad JT-B1 phone.

[learrus]

Some of this seems legit... Then it wanders off into opinion land...

[TheRealVerbz2]

@learrus Check the information in the video description for validations and corroborating research.

[learrus]

@TheRealVerbz2

I mean for example, the author constantly stating "Fail"... Also a diagram showing our planet and others being born from the Sun is incorrect... Planets and stars have been recently proven to form in giant "Star Forges" as I like to call them, mixing pot Nebula type deals...

[TheRealVerbz2]

@learrus The author is Me. And those concepts are failures.

Look into the brilliant work of Walter Russell, Dewey B Larson and Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat.

What is a star?

It's a planet whos atomic lattice is so aligned on so many scales that it's acting as an ionized crystal.

A star puts out Harmonic Frequencies which restructurize the atomic lattice of all surrounding matter within those waves.

When an atomic lattice has a deep enough order, that mass will glow from within.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@TheRealVerbz2 Waves travel Not light. Waves create an alignment which allows for us to see the already present light that we normally couldn't interpret unless atomic channels are opened up for that frequency to fill in.

Nebulae are charged particles and the atomic lattice structure of each atom making up the nebula is in perfect order.

Many planets were born from Our Sun.

Solar Flares can create bubbles which solidify. The mass restructures to act as a diode (magnet)

[learrus]

@TheRealVerbz2 They JUST released that info as far as I know

[gogogeedus]

Cool Video!

[mspinney203]

This video went viral on Apia

[delavega92]

so you saying when i turn on a light, i travel away from it? if you say light dont travel how came i shine my laser and see the dot on the other building?

[TheRealVerbz2]

@delavega92 No, the light is already present, but our eyes can't perceive it unless we balance out the inverse frequencies which are overwhelming the normal polarity we are used to interpreting.

Darkness is not less light. Female is not less male. Cold is not less heat. South is not less North. They are opposing polarities. When frequencies are in random states, there is darkness. Balancing out frequencies means you are able to see the light that is already there even more intense.

[Paradox949]

@TheRealVerbz2 But cold is less heat...

The coldest temperature possible occurs when the particles/atoms stop vibrating/generating heat.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@Paradox949 No, cold is not less heat. Cold is the Reciprocal of Heat! Big difference.

On a Magnet, there is Positive and Negative.

Negative is Not "less positive." It's the reciprocal / inverse.

The Universe operates perfectly at Absolute Zero. (0 Kelvin)

Anything above that is an Excess in energy. ALL particles are in motion.

Motion itself is a reflection of an Excess of energy.

Heat and electricity also.

There is no such thing as "atoms" stopping. All matter is in constant motion.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@Paradox949 The coldest possible temperature in the Physical universe is about 4 Kelvin.

Which means there is motion everywhere; therefore there is an excess of energy everywhere (as Tesla emphasized)

A particle can never achieve absolute zero because absolute zero is the Absence of All Motion. Matter, by definition, is In Motion.

All matter is in motion. Matter is Positive.

The Reciprocal of matter is energy.

The Reciprocal of time is space.

All of those things are in motion.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@Paradox949 Niels Bohr's model of the atom is bullshit fabrications. There is no such thing as a singly charged particle. There are no pulling forces like they teach. The cartoons they present in text books are assumptions or lies.

No one has Ever seen an "atom" or its so called parts as they show in books or cartoons.

ALL things in motion have duality of + / –

An "electron" and Proton are both in motion; therefore they both have a North and South Pole.

Look into Russellian Science.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@Paradox949 Cold and Heat repel each other. Positive and Negative Repel. Not attract.

Bring some liquid nitrogen in contact with lava and see what happens. "Boom"

Why? Because the 2 polarities are attempting to get away from each other at a rate faster then they can.

The mainstream interpretations of energy is Psyence, not Science.

Russellian Science is completely different than any thing taught in schools or even found in libraries.

See the information in the video description!

[TheRealVerbz2]

@delavega92 A man made laser is canceling out inverse frequencies in a column.

When you are seeing a dot, you are seeing a cross section of a wave attempting to pass through the wall.

The red light from the laser is Already everywhere you can see. But the man made device is allowing our eyes to see that frequency of light that's already there.

Use a flashlight in the fog and you'll see a cone of light.

Your light isn't making the fog, but rather is exposing what's already there.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@delavega92 All the frequencies you can measure are in motion. All matter is in motion. Space is the reciprocal of matter and it too is in motion. Space is not "nothing" / "emptiness." Space is the inverse of matter and it moves when matter moves.

Stars don't twinkle, but rather we are seeing fluctuations of space in between the stationary light already present which gives the illusion that the light is traveling or heat is traveling or that electricity is traveling.

Space is moving.

[MorseFeuer]

What is the tune called ???

[TheRealVerbz2]

@MorseFeuer The first song is called "Eurythmy (Style Clash Remix)" by Absance.

The second song is called "You In the Mirror" by Laurence Lee.

If you go to KeepVid,com.. you can enter the URL of Any YouTube video and download it for free.

Or you can also convert any YouTube video and music video into an mp3 by going to SnipMp3,com

[TheQedqubit]

wowee i love the earth is not flat >> the solarsystem is not flat arguement,

but i love it even more you showed the damn gravity field not being a checker board with a dent in it.that image always annoys me.

scientists are so stupid, merely repeating whatever they were taught in school.Us not being able to build pyramids 'n stuff should give them a clue, but no.

as radiation causes everything , not 'diametration'(=effect), probably pi=6.28...instead of 3.14...

[redrum41987]

I say the video is a fail. There's no evidence put forth. Light=rest, hahaha then how do they test the movement of photons?

[TheRealVerbz2]

@redrum41987 What they call "photons" are in motion. They are not measuring the velocity of light, but rather the velocity of a positively or negatively charged particle.

Light is neither + nor -.

The evidence for light being stationary exists throughout time and in every culture's belief system.

Not too mention the brilliant work of Walter Russell.

Nikola Tesla and Russell were good friends. Tesla told him to lock away many of his ideas for the next 1000 years until Humanity could accept it.

[redrum41987]

@TheRealVerbz2 Why would he tell him to lock away his ideas for 1000 years?

[TheRealVerbz2]

@redrum41987 So, I ask you... how familiar are you with the work of Nikola Tesla or Walter Russell?

Both of them came out the gate saying Einstein's interpretations were nonsense and offered actual validation for their understanding.

What did Einstein build? oh yea, a refrigerator. LOL

Have you ever read Dewey B Larson?

Or Pier Luigi Ighina?

How about Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat?

Have you bothered to look into the alternative views to mainstream models?

There's plenty in the video description.

[redrum41987]

@TheRealVerbz2 The only one I'm familiar with is Tesla. Who got his ideas jacked by Edison.

[freethisone]

This was one of the best movies i seen on youtube. thanks for uploading it.

Like professor Searl said, his devise operates by a sinusoidal action. I assume EDD LEE new this also.. sine waves, wow... i can do that...

[islandbuoy4]

hey maybe the SPIRAL and the SWASTIKA are related?

which came first?

the angular swastika or the curvy spiral?

we find the angular swastika dating to 10,000 BCE in Mezin Ukraine, and that glyph can be traced to 'fret patterns' dated to 23,000 BCE.

So when does the SPIRAL first appear as a conscious symbol?

The swastika has intention behind those HOOKED ARMS

[TheRealVerbz2]

@islandbuoy4 The ancients depicted the Universal Vortex in many ways. Some culture's used straight lines, other people used curves.

It's all representative of a Phi Spiraling Vortex.

The Swastika was taken from an ancient symbol which meant "Luck".

The Nazis flipped it the other direction.

They also had the Occultic Black Sun Symbol which symbolizes the same thing.

All the symbols represent the same vortex.

[islandbuoy4]

@TheRealVerbz2

u have it backwards

like I said I can trace the swastika and a vortex theory back to 5000 BCE...

yes I have sources

now do you have sources for your claims....the NAZIs did not flip anything....there have always been TWO opposing swastikas.

If you want to know WHO you are dealing with, who my source is, just do a search of 'ARCHANGEL RAPHAEL SWASTIKA'

have a nice day

namaste

Raphael

namaste

[TheRealVerbz2]

@islandbuoy4 Nazi's had their symbol facing Right. Most symbols you find of the cross are facing left. Ancient symbols came before Hitler. Yes, they are presented in multiple ways throughout history.

Also look into Jim Marrs' book called Rise of the Fourth Reich where he documents the history and use of the Nazi symbols.

People need to discern the information that comes from within themselves and stop giving outside credit to what they believe is a foreign source.

Do a search within.

Namaste

[islandbuoy4]

@TheRealVerbz2

you don't quite understand what went down.

IF the superstar Jesus did walk on water, guess which CROSS was the most popular among the pagans while he was performing?

yes of course >>> the swastika

Old testament GOD = YHVH = TETRAGRAMMATON = swastika

Why were the 6823 references to YHVH removed from the Hebrew bible, and slowly through time YHVH has morphed into JeHoVaH, the Lord, the Eternal?

SWASTIKA along with the MALTESE Cross is what has been HIDDEN IN PLAIN VIEW.

[youtuubbguy66]

Wow, simply amazing the demonstration at 5:09. I have to thank you btw for posting all these videos. For the past years, everything I read on the topic of "unknown" or "unconsidered" science is nicely shared through your videos. Kudos for your hard work!!

[speedrecovery]

Very cool :)

[JumpaFoSho]

Wow man just smoked some cheese and came across your channel. I'm so glad!

[TheRealVerbz2]

@pleasuredome85 The first song is called "Eurythmy (Style Clash Remix)" by Absance.

The second song is called "You In the Mirror" by Laurence Lee.

If you go to KeepVid,com you can enter the URL of Any YouTube video and download it for free.

Or you can also convert any YouTube video into an mp3 for free by going to SnipMp3,com

:o)

[2Ninjasmart]

Uh I wish there was some sort of narrator for this video cuz this is sssssoooo confusing :(

[SuperiorMind]

Lost me with the religious nonsense but I like some of the model depictions. Btw - a model of the galaxy can be made without directly seeing the galaxy from outside - proly they made their statement incorrectly.

Tis true the spiral is partly key to understanding matter-energy. Ex. Imagining spokes on a 2 wheels side by side - the ones traveling in opposite directions will pass thru each other because the sides closest are technically travelling the same direction - no resistance..

[TheRealVerbz2]

@SuperiorMind Philosophical, yes. But as I've said before, religion is the commercialization of Spirituality and the bastardization of Science.

Many people don't discern the difference between Religion and Spirituality. They hear key words that have a stigma associated with them and stereotype.

Many models have been made of the Galaxy but from inductive reasoning. Based on assumptions from previous theories. NASA = Never A Straight Answer.

"The Secret to Creation lay in the wave." Walter Russell

[5T4RSCREAM144]

Love it!

[5T4RSCREAM144]

Awesome video! Thanks

[eddydbod]

lol moths don't go into light to seek some sort of spiritual bull shit, it's a cruel trick of genetic instict from when they used the moon to orient their flight. Artificial light sources has not been kind to them. Then you go on to spouse some religious bull shit, that has even less(none) supportive evidence. Fail.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@eddydbod Religion is the commercialization of Spirituality and the bastardization of Science.

You need to discern the difference between Psyence and Science / Religion and Spirituality, etc.

Moths go into the light for the same reasons that humans look at stars and try to reach that glory.

Your "cruel trick of genetic instinct" is prosaic quackademic bullshit.

Look into the many books and supportive material offered in the description. (if you have the patience)

LOL at your Lamestream Psyence.

[MomoTheBellyDancer]

Cute. Now show us the math. It had better explain the elliptical orbits of the planets, for one.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@MomoTheBellyDancer Look into Dr. Keshava Bhat and DB Larson's material in the description.

reciprocalsystem,com/dbl

The problem is the math is correct but the values and concepts behind the equations are wrong.

Both Tesla and Walter Russell came out the gate saying Einstein's interpretation of E = mc^2 was nonsense.

There is no speed of light, so c either = 0, or we have to change what c represents in reality.

It's up to US to develop new math around REAL concepts in Nature.

[MomoTheBellyDancer]

@TheRealVerbz2

"The problem is the math is correct but the values and concepts behind the equations are wrong."

Still we manage to make highly precise predictions using that math. Can you do better with YOUR math?

"Both Tesla and Walter Russell came out the gate saying Einstein's interpretation of E = mc^2 was nonsense.""

So Tesla and Russell were wrong. Big deal.

"There is no speed of light, so c either = 0"

Do you even KNOW what that "c" is?

[TheRealVerbz2]

@MomoTheBellyDancer Did you take the time to look over the available information that contradicts what you already encountered?

Come back when you've done the appropriate research.

I've offered over 30 books for you to look into and many links, but you just come right back and comment with the same fallacious lamestream bullshit that I grew up with and learned was inaccurate.

Tesla and Russell were obviously right.

What did Einstein build? oh yea... a refrigerator.. LOL

[TheRealVerbz2]

@TheRealVerbz2 And maybe you should look into the note from Einstein to Tesla congratulating him on his 75th Birthday for his brilliance and countless inventions.

[looseSpark]

I love the music. Can you put up some credits so I can find it? Thanks.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@looseSpark :o)

The first song is called "Eurythmy (Style Clash Remix)" by Absance.

The second song is called "You In the Mirror" by Laurence Lee.

If you go to KeepVid,com.. you can enter the URL of Any YouTube video and download it for free.

Or you can also convert any YouTube video and music video into an mp3 for free by going to SnipMp3,com

Have fun getting your favorite songs and vids throughout the internet for Freee!

:o)

[TheRealVerbz2]

@1984cellardoor A vortex itself will oblate and prolate. (pulsate)Nothing is exactly spherical for more than an instant because all things are pulsating. Just like a swinging pendulum is not straight up and down for more than an instant.

Not all objects are trapped in the same magnetic vortex, like Pluto.

I have to look more into Dr. Keshava Bhat's explanation of elliptical trajectories to give an answer to do the information justice.

[Development2112]

You sir are " AWESOME!!!" this is rather fascinating, thank you for presenting these ideas.

[uawwildbob]

some things travel straight untill acted on by an outside force

[TheRealVerbz2]

@uawwildbob Name One thing in the universe that isn't already traveling in a vortex.

The Earth itself is spinning therefore everything on the Earth is already spinning by the time you initiate any action.

Everything in the universe is already constantly experiencing pressure on all sides from outside forces. (Background radiation)

There are No straight lines in any vortex and Matter itself is the result of the resistance created between 2 vortexes passing through each other.

[uawwildbob]

@TheRealVerbz2. light travels in a sraight line from its point of origin. we know that gravity can bend it and objects can reflect it. otherwise its a straight line. I have heard someone say that its curves but I have not seen any real evidence of this. it may apear to curve sence we are the object that is spinning in a vortex and within a vortex . Who knows just how many vortexs we are in , the possibilities are as infinate as our true universe

[TheRealVerbz2]

@uawwildbob I'm sorry but that's not accurate. That's the fallacious model promoted by Einstein and other Psyentists.

Light doesn't travel at all! It's the only stationary force in the universe.

Light IS the origin!

Light = universal rest. All things come from a state of rest and all motion will return to rest.

What psyentists are measuring are wave fields which allow them to see the light already present.

Einstein never heard of Walter Russell.

See the info in the description.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@TheRealVerbz2 Humanity does NOT know that "gravity can bend" anything. What Psyentists label gravity is an electric Pushing force from the outside in. Not a pulling force from the inside out.

There is nothing on the inside to pull. It's void of mass. The center of all vortexes is hollow. Not that a single point sucks in everything from all sides.

Nothing in nature does that on any scale. Mainstream models are complete bullshit.

Gravity is the attraction to light which = Rest.

[sn1pe352]

@uawwildbob actually if you were looking at yourself in a mirror 1 "Light Year" away, you would see that the light actually does curve by observing your reflection (It would be upside down) in analogy

[jonf888]

I feel this is an incredible video... and i like the music. So much important, and at times incredible information Im going to have to watch this a few times for it to start to sink in. Tons of stuff! - All motion is curved for one - I never thought of motion in that sense. Straight is impossible. Great video ;-)

[philipjhill]

This is a great video with some fascinating and thought-provoking stuff in it - pity about the annoying music, especially as I viewed it first in the office. Would have preferred a one-liner explaining what we're viewing or even contemporaneous web links so that one could look into interesting items by pausing and taking the address - but apart from that, looks excellent!

[TheRealVerbz2]

@philipjhill Right on for the support!

I specifically didn't put any vocals to the video because I feel it takes away from the visuals. A picture speaks 1000 words and people can easily figure out the meaning and implications especially with all the web addresses.

All the links are in the video description (as it says in the title), so you don't have to pause the video to get the sites.

Can never please everyone in regards to background music so I just put what I enjoy.

:o)

[muthich]

@Nutzernichtaus …und die Erde ist 'ne Scheibe… Du hast in einem Video erzählt, die Erde würde um die Sonne kreisen. Dann guck mal hier: 0:10

[Simper81]

Awesome video Jason!! :))

[Emmy2ism]

a solar flare is caused when magnetic energy which has built up in the suns atmosphere is released. there are huge magnetic loops on the suns surface and when they touch they short circuit and explode sending huge amounts of radiation through space and through almost the entire electromagnetic spectrum. I love this perspective of opposing vortex and the perfect symmetry of it

[iamours]

yeah baby!!!

[sahneboy79]

This moving view of the solar system is so revolutionary.

THX Mr. Verbelli + enjoy the journey ^^

[ngc22072001]

EXCELLENT! THANKS FOR SHARING

[ancientofways]

Brilliant and to the point. nyuk nyuk nyuk.

[JuSdAt]

looks like a compilation of my favourites list! nice!

[TheBMW320cabrio]

I REALLY missed your work Jason . WELCOME BACK !

salvatore

[badw0lfvirus]

can we inspire Mamma Jupiter to become a Sun now please :D

she reeeeeeeally wants to :)

[TheRealVerbz2]

@badw0lfvirus :o)

Jupiter won't become a Sun from the information I've studied.

It used to be a solid body after it broke off from the Sun many billions of years before Earth broke off.

As a planet moves away from the Star it's born from, it becomes more spherical in nature then expands and cools.

Mama Jupiter might earn it's Halo like Saturn once it reaches the same zone and distance behind the Sun. All planets have rings, but they only become visible a certain distance from their Sun.

[badw0lfvirus]

@TheRealVerbz2

it's a curious one isnt it ... you said it cools as it falls behind (as it were) ... so on that same vein, couldnt it supercool and become a Sun? with it's mass alone?

[TheRealVerbz2]

@badw0lfvirus All things expand and cool as they move away from the Sun or any source of positive pressure. It's contradictory to assume that something will supercool so much that it becomes an intensely hot Sun.

A star is different than planets. A star is a generating body and planets are degenerating bodies. Generation of mass is when 2 vortexes pass through each other with open ends facing each other.

Degeneration of mass is when 2 vortexes pass through each other with tips facing each other.

[TheRealVerbz2]

@TheRealVerbz2 Mass dictates nothing, it's only a partial reflection of 2 vortexes. Science assumes that the Sun is a nuclear ball of burning hydrogen gas. That's not accurate. The Sun instantly explodes the hydrogen it generates on demand. (Solar Flare)

If the Sun were made of hydrogen there would be 1 big boom and that's it... Sun would be gone since hydrogen is extremely volatile.

(The Sun is actually black but we Interpret those wavelengths as visible light. Look into the "Nazi Black Sun")

[badw0lfvirus]

@TheRealVerbz2 thankyou very much for that. I look forward to you and Dan Winter getting together ;)

meeting of minds. lovely ;)

[deekueue]

@badw0lfvirus

Not enough critical mass for self nuclear ignition :(

so never.

Just imagine how that would mess up everything in our solar system!

Yes mother pagan Jupiter Come ignite and destroy us all. lol

[TheRealVerbz2]

@deekueue There is no such thing as "self nuclear ignition." The Sun is Electric, not nuclear. And if Jupiter even Could become a Sun, it wouldn't screw anything up in the Solar System because the solar system doesn't work Anything like lamestream psyence teaches.

Jupiter, like all planets, is a regenerator. the Sun is a generator.

As a Sun discharges, planets charge.

The Earth is a Sun relative to the Moon.

Our Sun is a planet relative to Polaris.

Polaris is a planet relative to Alceyon.

[alchemikey]

awesome...loved the part with the red and blue rings hitting each other synchronized with the music

[77GSlinger]

Righteous Brother! Thanks for the great vid I will be mirroring it because it is so fucking good! Next time, let me and Matt write and perform some original Music for your vid!

Many Blessings and Great work Robert

[TheRealVerbz2]

@77GSlinger I can give you the video file without the audio so you can put your own music to the background! Put out the same video with different music to appeal to different demographics.

Good Idea!!

Let's Skype.

:o)

[Julia76087]

thank you!

[sn1pe352]

lol some of those videos look familiar :D

vortex ring collisions and dolphins especially , cool stuff keep it up broseph joseph

[hatsoff144]

way cool jason! :)