being unable to recover nuclear dna is not proof that said nuclear dna is non human. In fact this is a 100% human skull of a person with Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome-look it up.
@shadtek You have not looked at the evidence so you have no idea what this skull is because you are guessing. The facts are clear and you should go look into Lloyd Pye and the Starchild skull if you truly want to know the truth. If you want to say stupid things without even investigating a little further to see that 10% of the genome of this skull has already been identified and this skull is 100% NOT human, it is alien with alien mother and father than I have no need to debate w/U
He recently was here in South Africa with the science and Ufo Conference and he spoke about this starchild skull. Very smart and sincere fellow, very promising research, he has LOTS of information
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the latest DNA tests show that the Starchild skull (actually of an adult) has human mitochondrial (maternal) DNA (from outside the nucleus) but entirely alien nuclear DNA, thereby proving that this creature was the result of genetic engineering using a human egg cell and alien DNA from alien father and alien mother. A human probably gave birth to this creature. Is that right?
@SuperMagnetizer Yes your right, it gets a little confusing unless you have a PhD in DNA sequencing but your right. I'm not really sure why they (ETs) would do that but they must have a reason for it...
@guanajuato1987 Yes indeed your points are true, but I do believe the news would cover a story on aliens if and only if they are proven to be real(which in my opinion I don't think they do...we need to explore more to find out. The universe is big so there may be a possibility.). For now we don't know because it's not in the news. We can only speculate, you see. Anywho, I entitled to my opinion as you are too. All I'm doing is disagreeing¬ forcing anything on you. Have a good day :)
@parallelscale Hydrocephalus definItely sounds more plausible and believable! If this alien thing were true, why isnt it all over the news by now like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc? You know?
@BlueDragonFuze come on now you think the main stream media will cover a story about aliens that they cannot discredit... theres so much real news out there the MAIN stream media dosent show... or should i say dosent want you to know.
@kurreproduction1 The skull in this video is an exact replica of the real alien skull that is 900 years old. The real skull is locked up in a bank vault and never comes out except to take a piece of the skull for DNA testing. This skull in this video is the replica which is being held by Lloyd Pye who is the one in charge of doing all the testing on this Starchild skull.
@kurreproduction1 Because when you look at a sample of 30,000 base pairs you find that a chimpanzee is only 3% different from humans, a gorilla is only 5% different, a mouse is only 30% different BUT this alien is 50% different from humans. That means it is nothing like humans. There are no exact physical matches to humans on this skull. It can only be extraterrestrial from somewhere else not earth. There is NO genetic match to anything on earth. Pure Alien no human.
@goforitrandy i happen to know a little bit about the starchild skull as it is known. it was actually determined that it's mother was an earth creature, but the dna from it's fathers side matches no known earth creature, therefore the most likely explanation is that this is the result of an extra terrestrial species, probably very similar to us, having mated with one of our early ancestors. so i suppose for all intensive purposes, yes, it is an alien skull.
@enry898 I know that is the old DNA results. However this year in 2011 Pye has come up with new DNA results that prove conclusively that the father and the mother were both extraterrestrial. Go watch a new video with Lloyd Pye from May 2011 and you will find out about the new results. The best video is the one with Coast to Coast and Lloyd Pye in May/2011...
This is totally not human, the top of this skull is dent and also the top is red unless the douse the top if this skull with blood I think this is real. Also the facial structure is very similar to human features but the skull is extremely different from human so therefore it alien '°_°'
Elkardt you are wasting your time with this guy he is delusional. He just doesn't get it, the Starchild skull was found over 70 years ago and he wants to stick to his lame argument that it is 50 years old. This guy has no brain and he totally ignores evidence. You couldn't convince that guy to walk out of a burning building. He would claim some moronic excuse to stay in the building and burn alive. Lloyd has spent almost a decade researching this. Thanks for steping up.
It sounds to me like hydrocephalus or something of that sort. If you look up images you'll find children that have suffered from hydrocephalus and they easily appear to match this skull. And just like you said "If this were a human and the human head was this deformed it would not live very long... you can't have these kind of abnormalities and live a very long life span." Explaining why they died as a child.
@parallelscale The most important thing to keep in mind is one fact,,, there is nothing about this skull that is human. Everything about this skull is not human from the genetic makeup of the bone structure to the reference points that do not match up to human skulls it's as if this is something totally different that looks similar to human skulls however all the evidence points to something non human therefore extraterrestrial.
@EndTheResistance No not edited I simply video taped an image of the skull and Lloyd holding the skull and I spoke while I held the camera in my hands free hand style no trypod. No photoshop...
@guineapiggyman If you looked at the date just below this video or listened to the video which I clearly said at the beginning of this video that it is May 15, 2011 then you would have known exactly when this was filmed if that is what you are asking. Not sure if you meant taped or take? But in case you can't read or listen the date was May 15, 2011 and I have no idea what hoax you are referring to but this is not one of them... This info is new 2011 DNA results...
@goforitrandy im just wondering why either you, or the people who filmed the stuff in your video, are wasting time on a hoax. the starchild skull has been proven as a hoax 3 different times. dont get me wrong, i want this type of thng to be real, but in this case its not, and its taking resources away from ACTUAL phenomena
@guineapiggyman Ok, so I filmed this and that's my voice. Now you claim that it is a hoax but you offer no evidence to back up your hoax theory. Who proved it is a hoax? Because this has been seen recently on major media outlets like Coast to Coast which would never put a hoax on their radio show. Show me your proof because so far you are only making claims with nothing to back it up. Lloyd Pye is a very respected individual and he is not a hoaxer.
@goforitrandy well first, i havent missed an episode of coast to coast since before george noory was even involved in it. there have been plenty of times when topics of discussion on the show have been proven later as hoaxes. (the roslinda, the voynich manuscript, the phaistos discs, the Ica stones from peru, etc etc) if you search pretty much anywhere about starchild, they give details about its hoax status, and plenty of reasons why (which are too much to type out here). learn to do research.
@guineapiggyman Why would George Norray keep asking Lloyd back on his show year after year if it was a hoax? Check it out for yourself if you can figure out these simple instructions I'm gonna give you. (WATCH the Coast to Coast interview held on May 13, 2011 and you tell me why in the hell would Norray interview him if it was a hoax. ) Do Youtube search on ( Lloyd Pye on the Star Child Skull update May 13th 2011 1/6 ) Now you say you watch every show so you should already know this.
@goforitrandy god your an idiot. yes. on those dates, pye was on the show. but if you listened to the entire intro, youd know that on those nights (as he does often) noory, reruns older episodes from when he first started. your a moron
@guineapiggyman You stupid, ignorant and illiterate shithead. You can't read you can't spell. You can't even follow instructions. And you still haven't given one piece of evidence to back up your story YOU are totally wrong. I can't handle stupid people and you are the king of stupid. These new DNA results are from Mar/2011 so they are up to date and accurate you need to go back to school and get an education instead of trolling the Internet looking for a fight. "FUCK OFF LOSER"...
not to mention, if you knew anything about any science principles, the people who 'discovered' this claimed it to be over 900 yrs old. carbon tests showed differently. then they said they were able to extract DNA out of it. but theres one problem they didnt realize. (which ultimately sealed their fate as hoaxers)... DNA does not last anywhere near that long. especially in a skull, and not in a marrow-filled bone. have you not studied this?
@guineapiggyman You are making no sense at all.. I asked a simple question and you can't follow directions. I asked you to give me a name of who claimed it was a hoax and once again you are having a real challenge reading. You type out a bunch of unsubstantiated mumbo jumbo. Give my a source to check out your claims. I have given you my source Lloyd Pye. This man has impeccable reputation way before any of this Starchild stuff happened. What is your source of info?
@guineapiggyman I don't get people like you. You keep spewing out all kinds of crap. The date of 900 years was from carbon dating. That's the only way it's known to be 900 years old. DNA has been recovered from Neanderthals and they're 30,000 years old and more. It's a 100% real skull, there is no dispute about that and yet you keep claiming hoax. To this day, and even after doing your suggested google hoax search, I've never found one thing to indicate it's a hoax in anyway.
@Elhardt the carbon and radiometric dating found the skull to be no older than 50 yrs. its a real skull. but its a real HUMAN skull. hes right on that, hun. and as for you not being able to find evidence, well that just shows how bad a researcher you are. all your research consists of youtube and google searches. the original carbon 900 date was proven innacurate like 15 yrs ago! and who cares about neanderthals??
@happyGinnypiggy The bone of real human skulls doesn't have a chemical makeup like that of tooth enamel. The thickness of real human skulls is 2 to 3 times that of the Starchild. Real human skulls have human sized necks. Real human skulls have completely different eye sockets. Real human skulls don't have strange unknown fibers embedded in the bone. Real human skulls have 100% human DNA. And on ETC... You're pulling the typical nonsense I can't stand, that's ignoring simple facts like those.
@happyGinnypiggy In addition, I find it kind of hard to believe a skull found in the 1930's is no older than 50 years old. Simple math doesn't add up. Perhaps there's something I'm missing. I don't even think Lloyd Pye has been involved with it that long. Since the age of the skull has nothing to do with what the skull is, lying about its age doesn't seem productive, and the degradation of the DNA seems to put it older than 50 years. But anyway, its age a moot point anyway.
@Elhardt You are on track and Piggy has no idea about how to find the facts through research. He still has not given one piece of solid evidence to back up his claim. That guy just wants to create conflict and spread B.S. If the Starchild skull was a hoax it would be all over Youtube because everyone knows Youtube will uncover the truth no matter what you want to talk about because it is instant information that can be disseminated quickly and easily.
@happyGinnypiggy And you ask who cares about Neanderthals. I was responding to a guy who claimed DNA can't be retrieved from anything 900 years old. So I brought up DNA retrieval from Neanderthals. Seemed like a perfect fact to counter his false statement.
The dna test showed that the mother of the child was human, however when they attempted to recover the nuclear dna, after 6 attempst they couldn't. That would be the dna of both the mother and father of the child. There conclusion, was that the father of the child was either not human or not entirely human.
@Workman271 That is old news, done with the old DNA test that were not conclusive. The new tests done in 2011 show conclusively that both parents are extraterrestrial. There is a lot of evidence out there that is in conflict with the new DNA results. Find a new video of Lloyd Pye on Coast to Coast that was done recently I think in May 2011 this will clear it up for you directly from the horses mouth.
@goforitrandy I just watched the new one, they clearly say the mother is with out a doubt human, the new evidence is that they were able to recover the nuclear dna and that it has characteristics that aren't in any known species on planet earth. The claim is that this is the skull of an alien/human hybrid.
@Workman271 Ok, after watching a more recent interview with Lloyd Pye, he now claims that the mitochondrial dna is not human either. His original assesment that the mother was human was incorrect. They now believe with 100% certainty that the starchild was indeed an adult being that is a completely different species.
@Workman271 And now you know... I have been 99.9999% certain that extraterrestrials exist for 23 years now but when I heard that news two months ago I went to 100% certain that aliens are real. It could have been possible that UFOs were piloted by an advanced human race that lives off planet. This evidence proves that there is extraterrestrial beings that have and do visit our planet.
@goforitrandy I just hope that this is the real deal and not some pathetic attempt to make money off of books and lectures. The hard part about this whole topic is that if this is genuine, then there will most definately be people who will do everything in their power to keep this unverified by mainstream science and if it's a hoax the perpetrators would also want to keep this away from mainstream science to prevent it from being proven to be one. So we may never really know for sure.
@Workman271 We will know for sure real soon all they need is a few million dollars and they can complete sequencing of the entire genome and then all science and the main stream media will be forced to report the findings. Again this is kept in a Vault and it never leaves the vault except in little pieces that are used for DNA testing. They will know 100% and have UNDENIABLE proof in a very short time 1 or 2 years tops I would think.
@Workman271 This is what I understood, which I have evidence for that humanoids exist too, which proves aliens breed with humans. This analogy fits the biblical account of fallen angles breeding with mankind in Genesis.
@Parliament45 I was not PREACHING, I was stating the facts from the results of the DNA tests that have been conducted on the real skull. The results prove that the real "StarChild Skull is an extraterrestrial and in no way shape or form is it a HUMAN SKULL... So you can live in denial and stay in your closed little world and ignore DNA evidence that proves the Starchild skull is extraterrestrial. That means not from earth to be perfectly CLEAR.
@Parliament45 Wrong on all your questions, #1 I just told you in the last message ( I have never been in possession of the real skull or model skull. #2 I said in the video that this was a MOCK up of the original skull, that means not the real skull. Once I disclosed that this mock up of the original skull was not the original skull I thought I could just talk about the skull and everyone would get it that this is what the skull looks like exactly and I could talk about the real skull.
@goforitrandy Ok so let me clear this up for you, I took a video of a picture of Lloyd Pye holding the skull which is an exact replica of the "Star-child skull" While my video was filming I actually spoke about the real skull as if this exact replica of the skull was the real skull. The real skull never sees the light of day because it is locked up in a bank vault in an undisclosed location. Even Lloyd doesn't ever bring out the real skull anymore because it is priceless...
@Parliament45 I hope this is succinct enough. I never did buy, have in my possession, nor have I ever been in the same room with this skull or any model of this skull and I can categorically deny any rumours to that effect. I am showing the actual replica of the skull which is an exact replica in every way being held in Lloyd Pye's hands.
@Parliament45 Well clearly the eye sockets are not at all like humans ( human sockets are about 2 inches deep.)
This alien skull is a half inch deep. Human skulls are made of bone, This skull had an enamel type of substance that was half the weight of a human skull and 2 times stronger. This skull CLEARLY had fibers woven into the matrix of the skull, (No other species on EARTH has this and NO HUMANS in all of history ever did either. CLEAR enough? Or you want more?
Oh look, another "ape-man believer" that thinks magical mutations (evolution) explains all.
Number 1.....evolution is the biggest FALLACY to ever be theorized. And if you dont believe me....then view my page for scientific evidence exposing it.
The ONLY thing that has been proven to produce an entirely new species is a process called "gene hybridization"
The DNA results of this skull, and the flat backside of the skull show its NOT a child nor a human. Clear as day.
I have videos of presidents, air force officers, generals and astronauts all admitting aliens and their space crafts are here. Also 24 new 2010 videos from the History Ch that shows solid evidence the aliens were here thousands of years in the past. See the truth about the aliens explained better than ever before at my free website alienspaceshipidentified Google search engine. I swear if you read the entire website watch all of the video evidence you will understand the truth about the aliens.
@spaceshipidentified I have been at this for 23 years I have yet to convince anyone that extraterrestrials are real.
There is a huge difference between someone who believes in the possibility of ETs, and someone who is 100% convinced. People who haven't seen a real UFO just don't get it. They may want to get it, but they lack the conviction that someone like me has. It is a lot to handle especially if you know the big picture of UFOs and ETs.
This is one of 5 alien skulls that the world won't except as real because they are lost in religion and they can't except the truth because their man written book says so.With evidence around the world that the aliens have been here since we were cavemen.The aliens had to of provided us with the DNA that allows us to read and write.Every one should now the aliens are here and have been here but because of religion everyone is lost in a lie while the truth passes us by.
@churchofthelordjesus You don't need the result you are not intellegent enough to understand what the markers even mean. If you looked just a little you would have seen that I already gave you this information just below the video where I give the discription for this video. I get that a religious person like yourself is having a hard time accepting this information because it is gonna get you to question your beliefs like it did for me years ago.
@churchofthelordjesus Not another one, everything in the universe has DNA. We probably share 50 % of the same DNA with a Dinosaur but that means nothing. The DNA is universal BUT, if you structure the DNA in just the right way you get a human, or a dinosaur, or an elephant or an Extraterrestrial. The DNA from this skull is so far away from human that it is like comparing a house fly to a human. They have nothing in common but a house fly has some of the same DNA as us but not much.
@churchofthelordjesus #2 There was no Human DNA. No means NO... Nothing about this skull was human. The skull is totally different, it is like tooth enamel not Bone and has fibers woven into the matrix of the skull that make it significantly stronger and much lighter than humans (Like Kevlar). There are no reference points on the skull that are like humans. Yes the eyes are in similar places but much shallower. The structure is totally different than humans.
@churchofthelordjesus #1 If you know anything about DNA, it is like comparing a 1905 Model T to a 2011 Bugatti Veyron. Yeah they look like cars but one is light years ahead of the other in technology. The Alien skull is the same, The structure of the DNA is incredible. It is nothing like anything on earth however 50% of it's DNA is the same as ours. That doesn't mean much because a chimp is 97% the same as humans but we know chimps aren't human.
BLOM "I don't think you get it, the DNA on this thing is so far away from our DNA it has to be alien. Chimps DNA is 97% the same as Humans. Gorillas are about 90% the same as humans. This skull has DNA that is 50% different from Humans. That means that a gorilla has way, way,way more in common with humans than this skull did. Again everything about this skull is not human. Wake up and stop living in denial. ETs are real."
We don't even know what "Aliens" look like. We;ve made up this image of what Aliens look like in our heads, this isn't proof of anything but a weirdly shaped skull
@BeastLordofMetal Millions of dollars have been spent conducting DNA tests on this skull. The results so far show that the DNA from this skull cannot be found in the entire DNA database of ALL living creatures that have been archived . There was NO Human DNA found from this skull. That means this being came from another planet. Now you can choose to act or react the way you just did or google it for yourself and find out that this is true.
@goforitrandy Oh yeah, so just because the Skull's DNA/species hasn't been idenitified, that means it's an Alien from outer space.
There are things in life that are unexplainable, and somethings Sciene cannot explain. but it doesn't mean we should just jump on a bandwaggon and believe wild theories. This is just as bad as believing in Demons just because of a video showing cup moving by itself on a ouija board.
That isn't proof of Aliens, more evidence is needed.
@BeastLordofMetal Dude your mind is so closed off... I am telling you there is DNA proof out there and you are just dismissing DNA evidence... This is not theory. DNA is the proof. You must have believed in some DNA case where someone was guilty but how could you believe that DNA evidence. You didn't have the DNA evidence in your hands. Even if you did you wouldn't even know what markers to look for or even what you were looking at because you are not a scientist.
@goforitrandy I'm NOT saying it's NOT Aliens, all i'm saying is that you can't use this skull to prove that Aliens exist or that that skull came from a being of another planet. It's an ignorant claim.
I've watched tonnes of videos about this, and i admit i can't explain it, but that doesn't mean i have to believe it's an Alien skull either.
You're just as bad as the fucking christians, calling people close minded just because they don't believe the same thing you do!
@BeastLordofMetal No I'm convinced you are ignorant, rude, and obnoxious... I'm not asking you to believe anything. I don't care what you believe. But there are other people out there who would like to know this information. People with a brain unlike you. You are a trash talking idiot. There are people like me who already know the truth because we have seen them. I don't need DNA proof I have 1st hand knowledge. They exist, now get over it, I'm done talking to idiots like you.
@lethalsub That is old news, the new DNA evidence concludes that the mother and the father were extraterrestrials. There is some evidence that I am not 100% sure of how it works but something about the possibility that this alien child may have been placed inside a human women who gave birth to this being. but the being is not from this planet. I'm shocked you are even looking at this information. But once agian why do you have to be confrontational?
@lethalsub Because you have now been exposed to some of the truth maybe 1/1,000th of the picture and all you wanna do is ignore the fact that ETs are real and some people like me know this because they have interacted with us. How do you think I got all these videos of UFOs? I have on many occasion been contacted to go outside and when I do there is a craft or crafts that are hovering above me. This too is no accident.
@lethalsub New news is Mar/2011 to present. This is extraterrestrial because there is know known match in the DNA archives. That is not all, the DNA is way more sophisticated than human DNA or anything else on earth. It's like comparing a 1982 Apple computer to the most powerful Apple computer today. The amount of DNA strands is incredible. This skull came from a very advanced being that lived here 900 years ago.
@lethalsub I am not anti science, I have a problem with scientist, and religious leaders, Media, and governments who keep this information out of the publics hands. Just go watch this video on Youtube it is new... "Lloyd Pye on the Star Child Skull update May 13th 2011 1/6 "...
@lethalsub Your not concerned with ETs? You will be if some of the bad ones want to take your freedoms away from you... And if you haven't already figured it out I've only given people information that I believe to be accurate. I may make a mistake sometimes here or there, I'm only human. But than again some of my contemporaries think that all humans have some extraterrestrial DNA spliced into our DNA.
@lethalsub 1999 is ancient times for DNA, it was the beginning stages of DNA testing. They didn't have the technology or the protocols that they have today for testing DNA. That is why the old news is in direct conflict with the new news that was just discovered in the last 3 months. The old DNA evidence is not up to date or accurate. Find a new video of Lloyd Pye on the Starchild Skull in the last 3 months on Youtube. Lloyd Pye on the Star Child Skull update May 13th 2011 1/6
According to Wikipedia BOTH parents are human. This vid is a lie. Anyway, if this WAS true Icke would've put it up on his website, he hasn't!... (that was sarcasm by the way!)
@offwiththefairies77 Wikipedia !!! You do know that information on Wikipedia can be changed by anyone on the internet. It is the most unreliable source of information next to a one eyed fortune teller with hearing problems. This information is genuine and if you do a little research on the subject you will find out this is real proof of Extraterrestrials here on earth. And there is 100% proof that both parents were Extraterrestrial by DNA...
@offwiththefairies77 lol @ wikipedia... are u really that naive? i mean honestly now... dont be silly. this is genuine, and they are going to try and ridicule and cover this as much as they can... but u cant cover up scientific proof such as DNA tests.... we send people to prison from dna results... as soon as a dna test uncovers something they dnt want peopl to know.. all of a sudden dna testing looses all credibility.
@TheXhoobx You don't understand, the scientific community won't touch this subject till it is 100% proof. They have 10% of the DNA sequenced already which proves that this is an alien being. It's like having one fingerprint from a crime scene. That's enough to convict someone, BUT,,, the scientific community demands all ten finger prints before they will look at this evidence until then, they ignore this info, so does mainstream media.
@TheXhoobx There is a vid here on yt that has the man who actually owns the skull admitting the mothers DNA IS HUMAN!. At that time the father was still unknown. By the way, i am aware that wiki is dodgy!
@offwiththefairies77 Well the starchild website is a good start... And why are you asking me for "PROOF"!? when the skull itself IS the proof. Doesn't even sound like your giving it a chance... The skull has been extensively tested, the results came back that the skill contains DNA of nothing known to this earth or our sciences, Doesn't match any human or animal on this planet, never seen anything like it before, even the chemical structures of the bone are totally different to ours. DNA dnt lie
This is definitely not Progeria Sydnrome, again nothing about this skull is human... All of the reference points are different on this skull... Nothing including the DNA evidence which concludes this is not human period...
@JCBILBAOC Prepare for more bricks of deception like this one in the house of lies forming in just in time for the fallen 'alien' strong delusion to help bring in the 7 yr. NWO of the antichrist for 2012 +/- a year. Do not fall for it and get right with God while you still can. Check out my channel and website to learn more about this coming ultimate deception- the ultimate false flag of all false flags ever.
ive always said there are aliens and they have and are visiting us and possibly mixed with early man to form what we have today. if not seeded earth to begin with.
Really? Can you point me to a web page? You can email it here to my page? I want to see this, because this blew my mind when it first showed on TV... I've heard the deformed syndrome explanation etc... just send me an email please. I'll start looking but you seem to have some good evidence somewhere so I want it please LOL
@MrZorg2012 That is old news and old results, in the last few days this new news broke that proves that the mom was alien as well. The new DNA results show that there is no human DNA from this skull... Which means that this is 100 % extraterrestrial in origin...
Is this an "open" case? Or is it closed like every UFO-finding out there? It would be something you would find in the Wikileak-X-File cabinet... (I want to beleve, but i need more info)
@retroHC This new DNA evidence that just came out a few day's ago proves to most logical thinking people that here is DNA proof that extraterrestrials have visited this planet. The problem with science is that most scientist will ignore these findings and not believe the results until the entire genome has been identified then and only then will this be taken seriously by the media and mainstream science.
@goforitrandy Essentially what this means is this, 10% of the genome of this alien skull has been identified and all the DNA evidence points to the fact that the DNA proves that the mother and father of this being was extraterrestrial. The DNA that has been recovered from this skull has no evidence of any human DNA...
@goforitrandy Well. I consider my self a logical thinking dude... but as with everything i need to see it with my own eyes. Or at least have more meat on my bones to believe in a youtube clip. I will dig in deeper with this Star Child thing.
@MrTruthfinder123 Hey Lian, how have you been my friend ?... Yeah I thought the extra teeth lined up behind one another was totally a trip... This ET has teeth to spare when one breaks off another one replaces the original kind of like a shark. Hey The National Geographic Channel called me the other day from London they want me to give them some of my UFO footage from my channel for their new TV show "The Truth behind UFOs"...
@babykakesable - I was curbing randy's excitement and expected him to blow me outta the water (winks) but he pm'd me and patted me on the head - Its not fair, nobuddy hates me, sniff!
@stanwull I smile 1st, then act nice until someone gives me a reason to not be nice, than I go into verbal Ninja tactics if necessary. I just thought once you took the other side of the argument you hung yourself with your own rope... It's all good my friend...
@babykakesable Thanks my friend I was wondering when someone else was going to step up and support this amazing news... This story will be world wide news on CNN in the future once the DNA has been totally identified so that there is absolutely no other possibility but that this is a skull of a dead alien being that probably traveled across interstellar space just to get here 900 years ago... The world is about to change in a very big way once this news goes viral...
@goforitrandy i believe that this is the smoking gun! alot of skeptics talk about how to have absolute proof of alien excistence,would be alien DNA well i believe that this is it!!and the whole world will have to sit up and listen! : )
being unable to recover nuclear dna is not proof that said nuclear dna is non human. In fact this is a 100% human skull of a person with Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome-look it up.
shadtek 1 month ago
@shadtek You have not looked at the evidence so you have no idea what this skull is because you are guessing. The facts are clear and you should go look into Lloyd Pye and the Starchild skull if you truly want to know the truth. If you want to say stupid things without even investigating a little further to see that 10% of the genome of this skull has already been identified and this skull is 100% NOT human, it is alien with alien mother and father than I have no need to debate w/U
goforitrandy 1 month ago
He recently was here in South Africa with the science and Ufo Conference and he spoke about this starchild skull. Very smart and sincere fellow, very promising research, he has LOTS of information
Astrosurfer333 3 months ago
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the latest DNA tests show that the Starchild skull (actually of an adult) has human mitochondrial (maternal) DNA (from outside the nucleus) but entirely alien nuclear DNA, thereby proving that this creature was the result of genetic engineering using a human egg cell and alien DNA from alien father and alien mother. A human probably gave birth to this creature. Is that right?
SuperMagnetizer 3 months ago
@SuperMagnetizer Yes your right, it gets a little confusing unless you have a PhD in DNA sequencing but your right. I'm not really sure why they (ETs) would do that but they must have a reason for it...
goforitrandy 3 months ago
Whoa trippy...thanks for posting this..."liked"
DavidBylsma 4 months ago
did u just keep a photo holding that fossil and made this video??
anticlimax18 4 months ago
@anticlimax18 No, video still on TV...
goforitrandy 4 months ago
@guanajuato1987 Yes indeed your points are true, but I do believe the news would cover a story on aliens if and only if they are proven to be real(which in my opinion I don't think they do...we need to explore more to find out. The universe is big so there may be a possibility.). For now we don't know because it's not in the news. We can only speculate, you see. Anywho, I entitled to my opinion as you are too. All I'm doing is disagreeing¬ forcing anything on you. Have a good day :)
BlueDragonFuze 5 months ago
OMG great news I think?
AlgisKemezys 5 months ago
@parallelscale Hydrocephalus definItely sounds more plausible and believable! If this alien thing were true, why isnt it all over the news by now like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc? You know?
BlueDragonFuze 5 months ago
@BlueDragonFuze come on now you think the main stream media will cover a story about aliens that they cannot discredit... theres so much real news out there the MAIN stream media dosent show... or should i say dosent want you to know.
guanajuato1987 5 months ago
Is this a real alien skull?
kurreproduction1 6 months ago
@kurreproduction1 The skull in this video is an exact replica of the real alien skull that is 900 years old. The real skull is locked up in a bank vault and never comes out except to take a piece of the skull for DNA testing. This skull in this video is the replica which is being held by Lloyd Pye who is the one in charge of doing all the testing on this Starchild skull.
goforitrandy 6 months ago
@goforitrandy 900 YEARS???!!!!!!!??!!?
kurreproduction1 6 months ago
@kurreproduction1 Yes that is what the carbon testing of the skull came up with, 900 years old.
goforitrandy 6 months ago
@goforitrandy How do you know its alien DNA?
kurreproduction1 6 months ago
@kurreproduction1 Because when you look at a sample of 30,000 base pairs you find that a chimpanzee is only 3% different from humans, a gorilla is only 5% different, a mouse is only 30% different BUT this alien is 50% different from humans. That means it is nothing like humans. There are no exact physical matches to humans on this skull. It can only be extraterrestrial from somewhere else not earth. There is NO genetic match to anything on earth. Pure Alien no human.
goforitrandy 6 months ago 4
@goforitrandy Nice :D
kurreproduction1 6 months ago
@goforitrandy You've done your homework. Nice.
Black1349 5 months ago
@goforitrandy i happen to know a little bit about the starchild skull as it is known. it was actually determined that it's mother was an earth creature, but the dna from it's fathers side matches no known earth creature, therefore the most likely explanation is that this is the result of an extra terrestrial species, probably very similar to us, having mated with one of our early ancestors. so i suppose for all intensive purposes, yes, it is an alien skull.
enry898 5 months ago
@enry898 I know that is the old DNA results. However this year in 2011 Pye has come up with new DNA results that prove conclusively that the father and the mother were both extraterrestrial. Go watch a new video with Lloyd Pye from May 2011 and you will find out about the new results. The best video is the one with Coast to Coast and Lloyd Pye in May/2011...
goforitrandy 5 months ago
that there is a real alien skull !! thanks for this video
TheUfoKidFresno 7 months ago
get your boots on for this load of !#!@ its a HUMAN skull
inagod 7 months ago
@inagod It's ok for people like you to keep living in denial, this Is 100% Extraterrestrial skull...
goforitrandy 7 months ago
This is totally not human, the top of this skull is dent and also the top is red unless the douse the top if this skull with blood I think this is real. Also the facial structure is very similar to human features but the skull is extremely different from human so therefore it alien '°_°'
Nubufart 7 months ago
@Nubufart *cares* BOLD says this "alien" is actually fully human. Neuroscientists say it's just hydrocephalus.
4FunPlayin 7 months ago
Elkardt you are wasting your time with this guy he is delusional. He just doesn't get it, the Starchild skull was found over 70 years ago and he wants to stick to his lame argument that it is 50 years old. This guy has no brain and he totally ignores evidence. You couldn't convince that guy to walk out of a burning building. He would claim some moronic excuse to stay in the building and burn alive. Lloyd has spent almost a decade researching this. Thanks for steping up.
goforitrandy 7 months ago
@goforitrandy
It sounds to me like hydrocephalus or something of that sort. If you look up images you'll find children that have suffered from hydrocephalus and they easily appear to match this skull. And just like you said "If this were a human and the human head was this deformed it would not live very long... you can't have these kind of abnormalities and live a very long life span." Explaining why they died as a child.
Of course who knows what's possible. Just saying.
parallelscale 7 months ago
@parallelscale The most important thing to keep in mind is one fact,,, there is nothing about this skull that is human. Everything about this skull is not human from the genetic makeup of the bone structure to the reference points that do not match up to human skulls it's as if this is something totally different that looks similar to human skulls however all the evidence points to something non human therefore extraterrestrial.
goforitrandy 7 months ago
AWESOME! Simply amazing. THANKS to you & Lloyd Pye for sharing this with us.
Off now to view your March 2011 sighting with UFOs in the windows. Mmmm exciting!
~South Africa~ VO ~
annie46664 7 months ago
progéria its look same
superbigbill1 8 months ago
looks edited up on photoshop.
EndTheResistance 8 months ago
@EndTheResistance No not edited I simply video taped an image of the skull and Lloyd holding the skull and I spoke while I held the camera in my hands free hand style no trypod. No photoshop...
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy how long ago did u take this? cuz that was found to be a hoax a while back
guineapiggyman 7 months ago
@guineapiggyman If you looked at the date just below this video or listened to the video which I clearly said at the beginning of this video that it is May 15, 2011 then you would have known exactly when this was filmed if that is what you are asking. Not sure if you meant taped or take? But in case you can't read or listen the date was May 15, 2011 and I have no idea what hoax you are referring to but this is not one of them... This info is new 2011 DNA results...
goforitrandy 7 months ago
@goforitrandy im just wondering why either you, or the people who filmed the stuff in your video, are wasting time on a hoax. the starchild skull has been proven as a hoax 3 different times. dont get me wrong, i want this type of thng to be real, but in this case its not, and its taking resources away from ACTUAL phenomena
guineapiggyman 7 months ago
@guineapiggyman Ok, so I filmed this and that's my voice. Now you claim that it is a hoax but you offer no evidence to back up your hoax theory. Who proved it is a hoax? Because this has been seen recently on major media outlets like Coast to Coast which would never put a hoax on their radio show. Show me your proof because so far you are only making claims with nothing to back it up. Lloyd Pye is a very respected individual and he is not a hoaxer.
goforitrandy 7 months ago
@goforitrandy well first, i havent missed an episode of coast to coast since before george noory was even involved in it. there have been plenty of times when topics of discussion on the show have been proven later as hoaxes. (the roslinda, the voynich manuscript, the phaistos discs, the Ica stones from peru, etc etc) if you search pretty much anywhere about starchild, they give details about its hoax status, and plenty of reasons why (which are too much to type out here). learn to do research.
guineapiggyman 7 months ago
@guineapiggyman Why would George Norray keep asking Lloyd back on his show year after year if it was a hoax? Check it out for yourself if you can figure out these simple instructions I'm gonna give you. (WATCH the Coast to Coast interview held on May 13, 2011 and you tell me why in the hell would Norray interview him if it was a hoax. ) Do Youtube search on ( Lloyd Pye on the Star Child Skull update May 13th 2011 1/6 ) Now you say you watch every show so you should already know this.
goforitrandy 7 months ago
@goforitrandy god your an idiot. yes. on those dates, pye was on the show. but if you listened to the entire intro, youd know that on those nights (as he does often) noory, reruns older episodes from when he first started. your a moron
guineapiggyman 7 months ago
@guineapiggyman You stupid, ignorant and illiterate shithead. You can't read you can't spell. You can't even follow instructions. And you still haven't given one piece of evidence to back up your story YOU are totally wrong. I can't handle stupid people and you are the king of stupid. These new DNA results are from Mar/2011 so they are up to date and accurate you need to go back to school and get an education instead of trolling the Internet looking for a fight. "FUCK OFF LOSER"...
goforitrandy 7 months ago
not to mention, if you knew anything about any science principles, the people who 'discovered' this claimed it to be over 900 yrs old. carbon tests showed differently. then they said they were able to extract DNA out of it. but theres one problem they didnt realize. (which ultimately sealed their fate as hoaxers)... DNA does not last anywhere near that long. especially in a skull, and not in a marrow-filled bone. have you not studied this?
guineapiggyman 7 months ago
@guineapiggyman You are making no sense at all.. I asked a simple question and you can't follow directions. I asked you to give me a name of who claimed it was a hoax and once again you are having a real challenge reading. You type out a bunch of unsubstantiated mumbo jumbo. Give my a source to check out your claims. I have given you my source Lloyd Pye. This man has impeccable reputation way before any of this Starchild stuff happened. What is your source of info?
goforitrandy 7 months ago
@guineapiggyman I don't get people like you. You keep spewing out all kinds of crap. The date of 900 years was from carbon dating. That's the only way it's known to be 900 years old. DNA has been recovered from Neanderthals and they're 30,000 years old and more. It's a 100% real skull, there is no dispute about that and yet you keep claiming hoax. To this day, and even after doing your suggested google hoax search, I've never found one thing to indicate it's a hoax in anyway.
Elhardt 7 months ago
@Elhardt the carbon and radiometric dating found the skull to be no older than 50 yrs. its a real skull. but its a real HUMAN skull. hes right on that, hun. and as for you not being able to find evidence, well that just shows how bad a researcher you are. all your research consists of youtube and google searches. the original carbon 900 date was proven innacurate like 15 yrs ago! and who cares about neanderthals??
happyGinnypiggy 7 months ago
@happyGinnypiggy The bone of real human skulls doesn't have a chemical makeup like that of tooth enamel. The thickness of real human skulls is 2 to 3 times that of the Starchild. Real human skulls have human sized necks. Real human skulls have completely different eye sockets. Real human skulls don't have strange unknown fibers embedded in the bone. Real human skulls have 100% human DNA. And on ETC... You're pulling the typical nonsense I can't stand, that's ignoring simple facts like those.
Elhardt 7 months ago
@happyGinnypiggy In addition, I find it kind of hard to believe a skull found in the 1930's is no older than 50 years old. Simple math doesn't add up. Perhaps there's something I'm missing. I don't even think Lloyd Pye has been involved with it that long. Since the age of the skull has nothing to do with what the skull is, lying about its age doesn't seem productive, and the degradation of the DNA seems to put it older than 50 years. But anyway, its age a moot point anyway.
Elhardt 7 months ago
@Elhardt You are on track and Piggy has no idea about how to find the facts through research. He still has not given one piece of solid evidence to back up his claim. That guy just wants to create conflict and spread B.S. If the Starchild skull was a hoax it would be all over Youtube because everyone knows Youtube will uncover the truth no matter what you want to talk about because it is instant information that can be disseminated quickly and easily.
goforitrandy 7 months ago
@happyGinnypiggy And you ask who cares about Neanderthals. I was responding to a guy who claimed DNA can't be retrieved from anything 900 years old. So I brought up DNA retrieval from Neanderthals. Seemed like a perfect fact to counter his false statement.
Elhardt 7 months ago
@Elhardt actually, hes a little off, but youre WAY off. its around a thousand years till dna cant be recovered with any accuracy
happyGinnypiggy 7 months ago
The funny thing is, my name is also randy clark
RandalDandal69 8 months ago
The dna test showed that the mother of the child was human, however when they attempted to recover the nuclear dna, after 6 attempst they couldn't. That would be the dna of both the mother and father of the child. There conclusion, was that the father of the child was either not human or not entirely human.
Workman271 8 months ago
@Workman271 That is old news, done with the old DNA test that were not conclusive. The new tests done in 2011 show conclusively that both parents are extraterrestrial. There is a lot of evidence out there that is in conflict with the new DNA results. Find a new video of Lloyd Pye on Coast to Coast that was done recently I think in May 2011 this will clear it up for you directly from the horses mouth.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy I just watched the new one, they clearly say the mother is with out a doubt human, the new evidence is that they were able to recover the nuclear dna and that it has characteristics that aren't in any known species on planet earth. The claim is that this is the skull of an alien/human hybrid.
Workman271 8 months ago
@Workman271 Ok, after watching a more recent interview with Lloyd Pye, he now claims that the mitochondrial dna is not human either. His original assesment that the mother was human was incorrect. They now believe with 100% certainty that the starchild was indeed an adult being that is a completely different species.
Workman271 8 months ago
@Workman271 And now you know... I have been 99.9999% certain that extraterrestrials exist for 23 years now but when I heard that news two months ago I went to 100% certain that aliens are real. It could have been possible that UFOs were piloted by an advanced human race that lives off planet. This evidence proves that there is extraterrestrial beings that have and do visit our planet.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy I just hope that this is the real deal and not some pathetic attempt to make money off of books and lectures. The hard part about this whole topic is that if this is genuine, then there will most definately be people who will do everything in their power to keep this unverified by mainstream science and if it's a hoax the perpetrators would also want to keep this away from mainstream science to prevent it from being proven to be one. So we may never really know for sure.
Workman271 8 months ago
@Workman271 We will know for sure real soon all they need is a few million dollars and they can complete sequencing of the entire genome and then all science and the main stream media will be forced to report the findings. Again this is kept in a Vault and it never leaves the vault except in little pieces that are used for DNA testing. They will know 100% and have UNDENIABLE proof in a very short time 1 or 2 years tops I would think.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@Workman271 This is what I understood, which I have evidence for that humanoids exist too, which proves aliens breed with humans. This analogy fits the biblical account of fallen angles breeding with mankind in Genesis.
Tylorne 7 months ago
@Parliament45 I was not PREACHING, I was stating the facts from the results of the DNA tests that have been conducted on the real skull. The results prove that the real "StarChild Skull is an extraterrestrial and in no way shape or form is it a HUMAN SKULL... So you can live in denial and stay in your closed little world and ignore DNA evidence that proves the Starchild skull is extraterrestrial. That means not from earth to be perfectly CLEAR.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@Parliament45 Wrong on all your questions, #1 I just told you in the last message ( I have never been in possession of the real skull or model skull. #2 I said in the video that this was a MOCK up of the original skull, that means not the real skull. Once I disclosed that this mock up of the original skull was not the original skull I thought I could just talk about the skull and everyone would get it that this is what the skull looks like exactly and I could talk about the real skull.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy Ok so let me clear this up for you, I took a video of a picture of Lloyd Pye holding the skull which is an exact replica of the "Star-child skull" While my video was filming I actually spoke about the real skull as if this exact replica of the skull was the real skull. The real skull never sees the light of day because it is locked up in a bank vault in an undisclosed location. Even Lloyd doesn't ever bring out the real skull anymore because it is priceless...
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@Parliament45 I hope this is succinct enough. I never did buy, have in my possession, nor have I ever been in the same room with this skull or any model of this skull and I can categorically deny any rumours to that effect. I am showing the actual replica of the skull which is an exact replica in every way being held in Lloyd Pye's hands.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@Parliament45 Well clearly the eye sockets are not at all like humans ( human sockets are about 2 inches deep.)
This alien skull is a half inch deep. Human skulls are made of bone, This skull had an enamel type of substance that was half the weight of a human skull and 2 times stronger. This skull CLEARLY had fibers woven into the matrix of the skull, (No other species on EARTH has this and NO HUMANS in all of history ever did either. CLEAR enough? Or you want more?
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@Parliament45
This skull is CLEARLY alien.
Anyone that doesnt think so at this point must either belong to the Religion of Darwinism or be a Creationist (both are wrong)
All life is due to genetic engineering (specifically gene hybridization).
Gene Hybridization is the ONLY proven way to get an entirely NEW species. That rule works on all planets in the entire universe.
Last time I checked......this skull belonged to an extraterrestrial species known as "The Blues". Its not a Grey
buffboynick 8 months ago
@Parliament45
Oh look, another "ape-man believer" that thinks magical mutations (evolution) explains all.
Number 1.....evolution is the biggest FALLACY to ever be theorized. And if you dont believe me....then view my page for scientific evidence exposing it.
The ONLY thing that has been proven to produce an entirely new species is a process called "gene hybridization"
The DNA results of this skull, and the flat backside of the skull show its NOT a child nor a human. Clear as day.
buffboynick 8 months ago
@Parliament45 Sorry, so, are you saying it IS human or not??
offwiththefairies77 8 months ago
@Parliament45 Thank you for the info will suss it out. : )
offwiththefairies77 8 months ago
HOLY SHI-P
mrHacker160 8 months ago
I have videos of presidents, air force officers, generals and astronauts all admitting aliens and their space crafts are here. Also 24 new 2010 videos from the History Ch that shows solid evidence the aliens were here thousands of years in the past. See the truth about the aliens explained better than ever before at my free website alienspaceshipidentified Google search engine. I swear if you read the entire website watch all of the video evidence you will understand the truth about the aliens.
spaceshipidentified 8 months ago
@spaceshipidentified I have been at this for 23 years I have yet to convince anyone that extraterrestrials are real.
There is a huge difference between someone who believes in the possibility of ETs, and someone who is 100% convinced. People who haven't seen a real UFO just don't get it. They may want to get it, but they lack the conviction that someone like me has. It is a lot to handle especially if you know the big picture of UFOs and ETs.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
This is one of 5 alien skulls that the world won't except as real because they are lost in religion and they can't except the truth because their man written book says so.With evidence around the world that the aliens have been here since we were cavemen.The aliens had to of provided us with the DNA that allows us to read and write.Every one should now the aliens are here and have been here but because of religion everyone is lost in a lie while the truth passes us by.
spaceshipidentified 8 months ago
@spaceshipidentified Ok now I have to go check out your channel. You sold it, I'm heading out now to check it out.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@churchofthelordjesus You don't need the result you are not intellegent enough to understand what the markers even mean. If you looked just a little you would have seen that I already gave you this information just below the video where I give the discription for this video. I get that a religious person like yourself is having a hard time accepting this information because it is gonna get you to question your beliefs like it did for me years ago.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@churchofthelordjesus Not another one, everything in the universe has DNA. We probably share 50 % of the same DNA with a Dinosaur but that means nothing. The DNA is universal BUT, if you structure the DNA in just the right way you get a human, or a dinosaur, or an elephant or an Extraterrestrial. The DNA from this skull is so far away from human that it is like comparing a house fly to a human. They have nothing in common but a house fly has some of the same DNA as us but not much.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
Fascinating.
NewEraBoy11 8 months ago
@churchofthelordjesus #2 There was no Human DNA. No means NO... Nothing about this skull was human. The skull is totally different, it is like tooth enamel not Bone and has fibers woven into the matrix of the skull that make it significantly stronger and much lighter than humans (Like Kevlar). There are no reference points on the skull that are like humans. Yes the eyes are in similar places but much shallower. The structure is totally different than humans.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@churchofthelordjesus #1 If you know anything about DNA, it is like comparing a 1905 Model T to a 2011 Bugatti Veyron. Yeah they look like cars but one is light years ahead of the other in technology. The Alien skull is the same, The structure of the DNA is incredible. It is nothing like anything on earth however 50% of it's DNA is the same as ours. That doesn't mean much because a chimp is 97% the same as humans but we know chimps aren't human.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
BLOM "I don't think you get it, the DNA on this thing is so far away from our DNA it has to be alien. Chimps DNA is 97% the same as Humans. Gorillas are about 90% the same as humans. This skull has DNA that is 50% different from Humans. That means that a gorilla has way, way,way more in common with humans than this skull did. Again everything about this skull is not human. Wake up and stop living in denial. ETs are real."
goforitrandy 8 months ago
How the fuck is this proof?
We don't even know what "Aliens" look like. We;ve made up this image of what Aliens look like in our heads, this isn't proof of anything but a weirdly shaped skull
BeastLordofMetal 8 months ago
@BeastLordofMetal Millions of dollars have been spent conducting DNA tests on this skull. The results so far show that the DNA from this skull cannot be found in the entire DNA database of ALL living creatures that have been archived . There was NO Human DNA found from this skull. That means this being came from another planet. Now you can choose to act or react the way you just did or google it for yourself and find out that this is true.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy Oh yeah, so just because the Skull's DNA/species hasn't been idenitified, that means it's an Alien from outer space.
There are things in life that are unexplainable, and somethings Sciene cannot explain. but it doesn't mean we should just jump on a bandwaggon and believe wild theories. This is just as bad as believing in Demons just because of a video showing cup moving by itself on a ouija board.
That isn't proof of Aliens, more evidence is needed.
BeastLordofMetal 8 months ago
@BeastLordofMetal Dude your mind is so closed off... I am telling you there is DNA proof out there and you are just dismissing DNA evidence... This is not theory. DNA is the proof. You must have believed in some DNA case where someone was guilty but how could you believe that DNA evidence. You didn't have the DNA evidence in your hands. Even if you did you wouldn't even know what markers to look for or even what you were looking at because you are not a scientist.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy I'm NOT saying it's NOT Aliens, all i'm saying is that you can't use this skull to prove that Aliens exist or that that skull came from a being of another planet. It's an ignorant claim.
I've watched tonnes of videos about this, and i admit i can't explain it, but that doesn't mean i have to believe it's an Alien skull either.
You're just as bad as the fucking christians, calling people close minded just because they don't believe the same thing you do!
BeastLordofMetal 8 months ago
@BeastLordofMetal No I'm convinced you are ignorant, rude, and obnoxious... I'm not asking you to believe anything. I don't care what you believe. But there are other people out there who would like to know this information. People with a brain unlike you. You are a trash talking idiot. There are people like me who already know the truth because we have seen them. I don't need DNA proof I have 1st hand knowledge. They exist, now get over it, I'm done talking to idiots like you.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy I googled it, and read that Human DNA was found.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@lethalsub That is old news, the new DNA evidence concludes that the mother and the father were extraterrestrials. There is some evidence that I am not 100% sure of how it works but something about the possibility that this alien child may have been placed inside a human women who gave birth to this being. but the being is not from this planet. I'm shocked you are even looking at this information. But once agian why do you have to be confrontational?
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy If it is old news, where can I find new news?
How do you work out if an organism is extraterrestrial?
How is my previous statement confrontational?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@lethalsub Because you have now been exposed to some of the truth maybe 1/1,000th of the picture and all you wanna do is ignore the fact that ETs are real and some people like me know this because they have interacted with us. How do you think I got all these videos of UFOs? I have on many occasion been contacted to go outside and when I do there is a craft or crafts that are hovering above me. This too is no accident.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@lethalsub New news is Mar/2011 to present. This is extraterrestrial because there is know known match in the DNA archives. That is not all, the DNA is way more sophisticated than human DNA or anything else on earth. It's like comparing a 1982 Apple computer to the most powerful Apple computer today. The amount of DNA strands is incredible. This skull came from a very advanced being that lived here 900 years ago.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy You do give a shit about science when it suits you, or is this real science?
I'm not concerned with extraterrestrials, whether they exist or not. I am concerned about someone who feeds me erroneous information.
If the skull dna is completely non human, this means the dna result from 1999 is wrong. What did Lloyd Pye have to say about this?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@lethalsub I am not anti science, I have a problem with scientist, and religious leaders, Media, and governments who keep this information out of the publics hands. Just go watch this video on Youtube it is new... "Lloyd Pye on the Star Child Skull update May 13th 2011 1/6 "...
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@lethalsub Your not concerned with ETs? You will be if some of the bad ones want to take your freedoms away from you... And if you haven't already figured it out I've only given people information that I believe to be accurate. I may make a mistake sometimes here or there, I'm only human. But than again some of my contemporaries think that all humans have some extraterrestrial DNA spliced into our DNA.
goforitrandy 8 months ago
@goforitrandy Oh, if the mother is extraterrestrial, how is it the mdna was determined to be of human origin in the test conducted in 1999?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@lethalsub 1999 is ancient times for DNA, it was the beginning stages of DNA testing. They didn't have the technology or the protocols that they have today for testing DNA. That is why the old news is in direct conflict with the new news that was just discovered in the last 3 months. The old DNA evidence is not up to date or accurate. Find a new video of Lloyd Pye on the Starchild Skull in the last 3 months on Youtube. Lloyd Pye on the Star Child Skull update May 13th 2011 1/6
goforitrandy 8 months ago
According to Wikipedia BOTH parents are human. This vid is a lie. Anyway, if this WAS true Icke would've put it up on his website, he hasn't!... (that was sarcasm by the way!)
offwiththefairies77 9 months ago
@offwiththefairies77 Wikipedia !!! You do know that information on Wikipedia can be changed by anyone on the internet. It is the most unreliable source of information next to a one eyed fortune teller with hearing problems. This information is genuine and if you do a little research on the subject you will find out this is real proof of Extraterrestrials here on earth. And there is 100% proof that both parents were Extraterrestrial by DNA...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@offwiththefairies77 lol @ wikipedia... are u really that naive? i mean honestly now... dont be silly. this is genuine, and they are going to try and ridicule and cover this as much as they can... but u cant cover up scientific proof such as DNA tests.... we send people to prison from dna results... as soon as a dna test uncovers something they dnt want peopl to know.. all of a sudden dna testing looses all credibility.
TheXhoobx 9 months ago
@TheXhoobx You don't understand, the scientific community won't touch this subject till it is 100% proof. They have 10% of the DNA sequenced already which proves that this is an alien being. It's like having one fingerprint from a crime scene. That's enough to convict someone, BUT,,, the scientific community demands all ten finger prints before they will look at this evidence until then, they ignore this info, so does mainstream media.
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@TheXhoobx There is a vid here on yt that has the man who actually owns the skull admitting the mothers DNA IS HUMAN!. At that time the father was still unknown. By the way, i am aware that wiki is dodgy!
offwiththefairies77 9 months ago
@TheXhoobx SHOW ME YOUR PROOF!!! or at least where to go to find it!
offwiththefairies77 9 months ago
@offwiththefairies77 Well the starchild website is a good start... And why are you asking me for "PROOF"!? when the skull itself IS the proof. Doesn't even sound like your giving it a chance... The skull has been extensively tested, the results came back that the skill contains DNA of nothing known to this earth or our sciences, Doesn't match any human or animal on this planet, never seen anything like it before, even the chemical structures of the bone are totally different to ours. DNA dnt lie
TheXhoobx 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sounds all interesting. But can we have written references. Websites, names, press reports, contact details, credentials ?
strohbeck1 9 months ago
Sounds all interesting. But can we have written references. Websites, names, press reports, contact details, credentials ?
strohbeck1 9 months ago 2
Sounds all interesting. But can we have written references. Websites, names, press reports, contact details, credentials ?
strohbeck1 9 months ago
hell ya all you mainstream fag scientist can suck on this
smilano87 9 months ago
This is definitely not Progeria Sydnrome, again nothing about this skull is human... All of the reference points are different on this skull... Nothing including the DNA evidence which concludes this is not human period...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
Progeria Sydnrome.
BombusMan 9 months ago
FAKE
JCBILBAOC 9 months ago 2
@JCBILBAOC Prepare for more bricks of deception like this one in the house of lies forming in just in time for the fallen 'alien' strong delusion to help bring in the 7 yr. NWO of the antichrist for 2012 +/- a year. Do not fall for it and get right with God while you still can. Check out my channel and website to learn more about this coming ultimate deception- the ultimate false flag of all false flags ever.
fallenalien(dot)com
AlienshateU 9 months ago
ive always said there are aliens and they have and are visiting us and possibly mixed with early man to form what we have today. if not seeded earth to begin with.
FixedByDoc 9 months ago
starchildproject(dot)com : )
WvMISKAvW 9 months ago
Another obstacle for ET Disclosure has been cleared! ;-)
WinduChi6 9 months ago
Excellent research, concludes with solid evidence, Thank you for sharing,,, TILL NEXT TIME.
SuperGodz1 9 months ago
/watch?v=o424cvll0Xo&feature=channel_video_title
Red Ice Radio - Lloyd Pye - Starchild Skull DNA, Disclosure & Directed Panspermia
soit25 9 months ago
yes, yesterday i heard interview on red ice radio with the scientist tested this scull - he's shure that this is beginning of disclosure
soit25 9 months ago
No link in my email yet??? why not.???. Guess it is bullshit.
MrZorg2012 9 months ago
Really? Can you point me to a web page? You can email it here to my page? I want to see this, because this blew my mind when it first showed on TV... I've heard the deformed syndrome explanation etc... just send me an email please. I'll start looking but you seem to have some good evidence somewhere so I want it please LOL
MrZorg2012 9 months ago
Yeah, as I last heard about it, they recover the mom's dna, but nothing else. And it would have to undergo further testing... btw the mom was human.
MrZorg2012 9 months ago
@MrZorg2012 That is old news and old results, in the last few days this new news broke that proves that the mom was alien as well. The new DNA results show that there is no human DNA from this skull... Which means that this is 100 % extraterrestrial in origin...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@goforitrandy
Yes thats true.
It was a full-alien born to a human mother.
Its believed that it was an experiment involving a species of aliens known as "the blues" and not the Greys like many think.
The DNA analysis also proved that it belongs to an "adult" and not a child.
Pye first thought it was the skull of an alien-human hybrid child. But the DNA proved even he was wrong and its a FULL alien.
The Flat backside of the skull and DNA also shows its not a "hydrocephalic" human skull.
buffboynick 9 months ago
@goforitrandy PLEASE, Can you provide me with a link to these new results you refer to?!
offwiththefairies77 9 months ago
Is this an "open" case? Or is it closed like every UFO-finding out there? It would be something you would find in the Wikileak-X-File cabinet... (I want to beleve, but i need more info)
retroHC 9 months ago
@retroHC This new DNA evidence that just came out a few day's ago proves to most logical thinking people that here is DNA proof that extraterrestrials have visited this planet. The problem with science is that most scientist will ignore these findings and not believe the results until the entire genome has been identified then and only then will this be taken seriously by the media and mainstream science.
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@goforitrandy Essentially what this means is this, 10% of the genome of this alien skull has been identified and all the DNA evidence points to the fact that the DNA proves that the mother and father of this being was extraterrestrial. The DNA that has been recovered from this skull has no evidence of any human DNA...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@goforitrandy Well. I consider my self a logical thinking dude... but as with everything i need to see it with my own eyes. Or at least have more meat on my bones to believe in a youtube clip. I will dig in deeper with this Star Child thing.
retroHC 9 months ago
Hi Randy, excellent vid, it sure is an amazing scull. I also thought it quite interesting
that when they extracted one of the teeth they noticed that there were another 5 sets
of teeth ready to follow. One might speculate from that this ET would be able to live
a long life. Stay cool bud, keep up the great work and I look forward to more of great reporting!!
MrTruthfinder123 9 months ago
@MrTruthfinder123 Hey Lian, how have you been my friend ?... Yeah I thought the extra teeth lined up behind one another was totally a trip... This ET has teeth to spare when one breaks off another one replaces the original kind of like a shark. Hey The National Geographic Channel called me the other day from London they want me to give them some of my UFO footage from my channel for their new TV show "The Truth behind UFOs"...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
What a lot of speculative waffle concerning a cut-out of a photgraph !!
stanwull 9 months ago
Comment removed
realgoforitrandy 9 months ago
@stanwull check out The Star Child video's on you tube,its all true my friend!
babykakesable 9 months ago
@babykakesable - I was curbing randy's excitement and expected him to blow me outta the water (winks) but he pm'd me and patted me on the head - Its not fair, nobuddy hates me, sniff!
stanwull 9 months ago
@stanwull I smile 1st, then act nice until someone gives me a reason to not be nice, than I go into verbal Ninja tactics if necessary. I just thought once you took the other side of the argument you hung yourself with your own rope... It's all good my friend...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@stanwull tee! hee! your just being naughty!
babykakesable 9 months ago
@babykakesable Thanks my friend I was wondering when someone else was going to step up and support this amazing news... This story will be world wide news on CNN in the future once the DNA has been totally identified so that there is absolutely no other possibility but that this is a skull of a dead alien being that probably traveled across interstellar space just to get here 900 years ago... The world is about to change in a very big way once this news goes viral...
goforitrandy 9 months ago
@goforitrandy i believe that this is the smoking gun! alot of skeptics talk about how to have absolute proof of alien excistence,would be alien DNA well i believe that this is it!!and the whole world will have to sit up and listen! : )
babykakesable 9 months ago