Added: 3 years ago
From: PsychDoctorate
Views: 1,035
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Denying the Antecedent, that's it! Thanks! IF NOT A THEN B; I failed formal logic...but I could not blame the books, the subject nor the professor, which is easy to do when getting an "F"...I just had a problem trying to use that critical thinking...facisinating class although

  • As my name here suggests I try to learn about "recovery" and compare to "clinical psychology" 1991 Basic Assumptions of Mental Health Recovery starts with saying that a person can recover without any professional intervention...then every word following is about a prof intervention...Do you know what to call this fallacy? I know that's off your subject for me to ask...but you explain things well

  • I think that this is along the lines of a false dilema or denying the antecedent.  We have a dichotomy self recovery and prof intervention. Both are valid, but using clinical intervention to back up self recovery denies the possibility of self recovery. I think self recovery also is dependent upon the type of mental health issue being discussed. Unipolar depression which does not have root in a physical cause can be dealt with is a good example of how one can use both methods successfuly!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more