Added: 1 year ago
From: giffords2
Views: 32,293
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (189)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The freedom of speech will die when the people do not try to defend it against its true enemy, the government.

  • This needs to be played over the intercom at EVERY WALMART STORE!!!

  • I will Pray, talk about Jesus and say Merry Christmas...anytime, anywhere I want to so, don't try and stop me...I fear nobody and I live in a free country the U.S.A.

  • Is America Being Deprived of Godly People Through Denying the children when they are young ? What is the long run outcome when children are deprived of Gods love ? What does Jesus Say if we deny the little Children Gods real love ? This country was indeed founded on Gods love & indeed we can go all the way back &see it was founded on Gods love even before America Had its Independence ! Look at roger williams & all the others whom were the real founding fathers& mothers as hear is the real truth.

  • They (Government) took Christianity out of the Schools when I was in 2-3rd grade.That was wrong ! When did the schools become Governmental institutions? Christianity was our Nations schools & Churches Save Catholic & Jew Schools, So the Government Governed over the Christian faith Religion & today & for many years allow New age cults whom deny God & National security of our nation to govern our children in the schools ! So we may loose our freedoms we have all known, & no USA in God We trust. ?

  • Comment removed

  • Back then their were only 2 religions that were acceptable with the Settlers in America: 1. Christianity, Catholic's same as Christians (O.T.& N.T.), & 2. Jews Which are of the O.T(of the Same God)Their were no other religions at the said time in American Settlers Hearts, Minds & Souls. I don't think they ever knew this country would have become as great as it is to day & so we need to Go back & pay respects to that laws for which time it was written or we will loose this nation.ACLU Controls ?

  • If read correctly : The Formed Government has no rights to Govern the rights to those with Christianity ! It also does not deny a member of the Government of Gods love in them. it has indeed prohibited Christianity yet respects other forms of liberties ACLU that came along later above the first amendment and thus disrespects their rights in Christianity but allows all other forms of religions, cults protected under ACLU. General & President Washington prayed with His military troops !

  • MEMO TO WALMART...

    NEXT TIME YOU KICK OUT SOMEBODY USING THE INTERCOM FOR A PRANK, REMEMBER THIS: WHAT PART OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION DOES WALMART NOT UNDERSTAND?

  • I agree wth her!

  • I noticed, every thing about Gabby is beautiful

  • The 1st Amendment isn't a standalone set of clauses; its use must comply with the Constitution itself, notably on true liberty +general welfare.

    There's no corporate Right to promote covert treason.

    True Freedom of Press must also exclude DEMONIZING other people now included in The Press such as Youtube users, as that deterministically limits their freedom to get views across.

    Press Freedom rights exclude propaganda to pauperize America (by undertaxing the rich) as that violates the first para.

  • arizona voters to impeach janet brewer: petition online

  • When she makes a full recovery, she would make a great candidate for president. She would blow palin outta the water.

  • what a woman,hope she recovers fully, a real asset to the people of AZ and the country. an inspirational public figure.

  • For a free copy of 'Common Sense 2: A Summary View' visit:

    theTRuthbrand . com

  • I see it hidden in the white man's skull the map to reveal the dark city on mars!

  • SAD

    

  • The 1st amendment reads "STFU"

    You can has no speeches.

  • @0rionProject "STFU"?

  • Let's agree on this: NO new laws to change the1st & 2nd Amendments! All bad ideas must be exposed as it is and the general public will make the correct choice through the VOTING process which will make sure that TRUTH triumphs. When individuals commit crimes that's an individual problem that FBI and other agencies would need to stop and prevent with the CURRENT LAWS. KKK,Neo-Nazis and others are never going to win a majority even when they are protected under 1st amendment.

  • why cant phycotic assholes pick a terrible politician to get rid of?

    why did he have to get rid of one that cared for our first amendment?

    now we are -1 freedom loving politician

    Fuck Jared Lee Loughner

  • Titparty is correct. Most of the negativity is from one side only! The very side which calls for the protection of the constitution but would disregard it when it comes to others who disagree with them. It has been proven through discussion that one side is totally ignorant of the facts and is hypocritical towards the spirit of the constitution.

  • What irony. Rep. Giffords reads the 1st Amendment on the floor of Congress on Jan 6. In response to her tragic shooting at the hands of a paranoid schizophrenic two days later, the liberal fascists are demanding Congress take away the people's freedoms of speech and the press.

  • @LiberalDrivel "liberal fascists" does not exist. Technically, a "liberal" wants to preserve natural rights. Rather than taking away the 1st & 2nd Amendments we could have psychological testing throughout Middle schools and high schools and even at the college level. I think we could agree on this rather than messing with the constitution which preserves the natural rights.

  • @classitup10 mentioning "666" would indicates that you would want a THEOCRACY in replacing the (Deistic) Republic? Your mentioning of this number which was used to identify the past roman emperor - Nero, only tells me you expect which would only result in the removal of the US Constitution with a Theocracy.

  • Far left nut jobs do not like the First Amendment. That is why it was a FAR LEFT NUT JOB who shot her. We need to diagnose liberalism as a mental disorder so we can get these sickos the professional help they need. they need to be rounded up and put in asylums.... ALL OF EM'

  • @CulpepperMinuteman You just violated the 1st Amendment by requiring rounding up FAR LEFT or those who follow "liberalism". You just committed the same mistake!

  • Hope you feel better and make a great recovery

  • Ignoring all of the controversy here, Congresswoman Giffords has a beautiful voice. Did anyone else find it poetic that she spoke about the freedom of speech so sweetly? Please, God and physicians, carry her through this. By all accounts, Gabby Giffords never had a harsh word for anyone, and her first reaction to verbal attacks was to turn the other cheek and offer to help.

  • @Smitelight She has a really beautiful voice. She was a remarkable politician who got shot doing what she enjoyed doing. I pray everyday that she will fully recover so we can hear her voice and so she can keep fighting for her constituents. 

  • @Smitelight i couldnt possibly agree with you more!

  • Don't worry about it.Let the mexcans work it out for us.

  • Nice words... where are the actions?

  • "...The left side of the brain, where Giffords was struck, controls language and speech..."

    Dear Gabrielle, we pray that your speech, as well as ours, remains intact.

  • @i0vae amen!

  • @SirSafer Combine drugs with guns you idiot! Man! You are stupid!

  • Srah palin is an uneducared Sicko! Id never support her!

  • 1st amendment, ahhh, those were the good ole days... Now you have to get a permit and be sure you don't offend any "minorities" or a certain foriegn nation... lol

  • @SirSafer I'd rather live in free civil country where politicians and public figures are held accountable for their speech and actions. Free speech is not without consequences if it is used to incite violence and subversion of democratic process.

  • @TheFoliageCradle Yeah, you're right. Whoever spent their time doing that is a little nuts.

  • @TheFoliageCradle yea i dont think so ... not possible

  • WTF.... Loughner just commented 4 hours ago.

  • 666 is koming

  • @CIassitup10 So who this? A family member?

  • @CIassitup10 let me make my self ABSOLUTLY CLEAR on this subject!

    there is NO NWAY in hell that the person made this account or a fake 1 because he has uploaded the same exact videos !!! THIS IS indeed the sjhottrers account!! no 2 ways about it!!

  • @normalamericanguy Yes...it's a fake account. Notice how an uppercase i look like a lowercase L? I vs l. Looks the same, right? Paste this text into notepad and you'll see the difference.

  • @phuhkit oh shit ... shows how stupid i am ... damn im dummed down .... :(

  • @CIassitup10 Explain to me who is "666",exactly? I knew this was coming! This is why I went all out to explain that "666" is the Roman emperor which has been proven to be him through historical records!!!!!

  • @CIassitup10 This smells like "operation 40" Millennialists group! Yes, I call them a millennialists group trying to create recreate prophecies within the book of Revelation. EVENTHOUGH, it has been proven that the Book of Revelation is not about prophecies but rather a natural prediction. Yes, it is NOT true but there are some ppl,like yourself,who are trying to disrupt domestic and foreign areas of US policy to recreate images within the Book of Revelation.

  • sorry thegirlpuss that was meant for ppaaddyy

  • THERE'S A MILLIONS QUESTIONS RIGTHNOW. Congress must think twice before make any new laws.INNOCENT PEOPLE DIE CAUSE OF THIS CRAP.

  • Why is it the Democrats keep having to read the parts of the Constitution that they obviously fail to understand ?

  • It's creepy what she is reading.

  • Shame on CNN for running commercials durring the shooting of Rep. Gifford on January 8, 2011. Cable TV has no shame considering they are responsible for much of the inflamatory rhetoric that exiistis in todays political climate.

  • Why is Giffords' youtube channel subscribed to the shooters channel?

    And when did that subscription take place?

    Before or after the fact, it's very creepy.

    And what happened to the second shooter or accomplice?

  • @RandomShellAccount

    The last visit date is 16 hours ago -- after the shooting.

    The most likely explanation: The channel is administered by a staff member who thought it appropriate to add the classitup10 for historic reasons or to point people to the assassin.

    It is unfortunate that this can't be confirmed because the Google cached version of the page was last modified a few hours ago -- after the last visit date.

  • @thegirlpuss before that visit, the last visit was two days before she was shot,, and SHE WAS SUBSCRIBED TO HIM then.

  • @ppaaddyy

    Please take a look at her channel page. You will see that the last visit date was 18 hours ago. AFTER THE SHOOTING. That is verifiable (go to her channel) indicating that someone else has access to her channel.

    Please provide evidence. I don't respect claims without evidence. What is it?

  • @thegirlpuss before that visit, the last visit was two days before she was shot,, and SHE WAS SUBSCRIBED TO HIM then.

  • @ppaaddyy

    Please take a look at her channel page. You will see that the last visit date was 18 hours ago. AFTER THE SHOOTING. That is verifiable (go to her channel) indicating that someone else has access to her channel.

    Please provide evidence. I don't respect claims without evidence. What is it?

  • @thegirlpuss here's your evidence

    I can't post the link to the screenshot

    look on above top secret thread name is

    Jared Loughner (Rep. Gifford's shooter) Youtube Channel - Weird stuff here- page 2 Now that you have your evidence ... what will you do?

  • Wow! Of all people to target he shot the girl who read the First Amendment! Talk about luck of the draw, and he fucked it up big time!

  • ummm. He was a leftist.

  • @EasTexan6326 Left, right, center, who the fuck cares?

    Freedom of speech is a right, if you can't appreciate your rights regardless of political stance, then be prepared to live in fear.

  • @EasTexan6326 I thought Tea Party Members were neither republican or democrat? Just seem crazy to me

  • How could the Right sleep at night when one of their own lunatic killed a 9 year old girl and judge.

    Fox news downplays the incident by calling him a pothead

  • What happened to peaceably? The ugly party of no tolerance that's what happened to it..i blame the palin's,,,beck's and the whole faux news channel for this..Now what..do all that disagree get a bulls eye on their back?This lady was not an extreme lefty but a blue dog Dem...even if she was does that warrant a bulls eye on her back? When will people learn that words do indeed have consequences?

  • I heard she just got shot and the shooter also murdered a 9 year old girl and four others have been killed

  • What if a middle eastern person, muslim, black man or hispanic person ran up in a place and shot some people including an elected official? There would be outrage all over America and from everybody here on Youtube. A white man shoots some people and a lot of you are acting like you don't care and aren't saying one negative thing about it. Shit like this is exactly why I criticize white people all the time, you guys are fucked up in the head.

  • Why is it that the Constitution alway calls upon the "people" to act, assemble, or petition peacefully, when our government acts with blatant aggression toward us when ever they choose to?

    .

    I am sick of elected officials who working for us, think they deserve better pay, better health care, and respect they don't deserve. Let us balance the budget on their backs and upon the blood sucking banks and insurance congolomorates who pander to them every day!

  • @pjamesbda I partially agree. Elected officials shouldn't make that much money. They should try to get the job because they want to do real good for the country, not so they can have a well-paying job.

  • @FeralCr - lets get reality check ...here is an example: Rick Scott (the new Fl. gov.) came in from the Health industry stinking of corruption there, decides to run for Govenor, wins by funding his own campaign, and then turns down the pay check and gov. jet. Wow, I'm so impressed. This one is in it for the state with the biggest number of retired on Medicare. He plans to sue DC over healthcare, and privatize everything. Guess where that would land him?

  • Just hope she makes it through.

  • Those who remember this are the true patriots

  • I like how this is so easy to forget but still so frequently referred to by idiots

  • All these types of crime are by people with no brains and corporate-hired right-wing thugs.

  • Sarah FAILin' Quitter soon after the news broke. Oops Twitter soon after the news broke. SarahPAC took down the target graphics, which proves she is as guilty as the shooter.

  • i hope she wasn't reading the 2nd amendment when she got shot.

  • It's funny people making fun of Palin for some questionable map, when Obama is directly responsible for genocide.

  • @reapfreak what the hell are you talking about

  • @reapfreak No. That's not funny. And it's not true. And you need to examine your own humanity when this is your response to this video on a day when someone murdered a child, and federal judge, and shot this public servant in the head.

  • @reapfreak what?

  • @reapfreak you ARE a freak.

  • Sarah Palin is stunned she is being criticized for putting the cross hairs of a target on a US Congresswoman, who got shot, WTF did she expect. FAIL

  • The shooter was an atheist.

  • @OmniSurveyor so what? 

  • @BurnSpangler Just wondering if her reading the 1st ammendment aloud earlier this week may have set the nut off.

  • @OmniSurveyor So?

  • @joetheshoebro Just wondering if her reading the 1st ammendment aloud earlier this week may have set the nut off.

  • That woman is precious. She spoke out against Sarah Palin's violent rhetoric once. I look forward to hearing her thoughts after her recovery.

  • @xxSUMBLKGUYxx congrats, that is the dumbest thing I have heard today.

  • @xxSUMBLKGUYxx congrats, that is the dumbest thing I have heard today.

  • @xxSUMBLKGUYxx

    u deserve as many thumps up as possibe soo true

  • @xxSUMBLKGUYxx at least the sleepers!

  • Jared Lee Loughner is the shooter, he has a YouTube channel (classitup 10's channel), he does not seem to be of sound mind, not a tea party crazy, but not a well man. Second Amendment rights always trump First Amendment rights, it's sad really.

  • @drinkthecoolaid666 I may not be a fan of the tea party or their ideals, but that comment was uncalled for and offensive.

  • This is, without a doubt, a politically-motivated murder. And those in the media who talk about how the nature of this action against a Democratic Congresswoman and a Federal Judge who were fighting for rights of immigrants must see themselves in the mirror, and ask wether they are responsible or not for the constant instigation of this act.

    How many more people have to die because tea-party fanatics bring guns and shoot people in political meetings, before it is solved?

  • @GreatRedMenace Its really no longer called "The tea-party." The republicans hijacked it long ago...

  • Sarah Palin had her on her 20 hit list, marked with cross hair. God job Sarah and her supporters , you should be proud of yourself.

  • @TitParty You'd think that you would retract this after information has come out that the shooter had no political affiliation and that he's has beef with Giffords before anyone even knew who Palin was.

  • @phuhkit Why did SarahPAC took down the graphics in wake of shooting? I am not suggesting she is directly responsible, but why did graphics get taken down?

  • @TitParty And the Beatles are to blame for the people Charlie Manson killed. They should be proud too, right?

  • @metalpsalm Did Beatles single out Sharon Tate?

  • @TitParty I despise Sara Palin, but there are no facts to back up your simplistic generalizations which makes you appear ignorant...

  • @da324 Congresswoman Giffords herself spoke against that particular graphic and general rhetoric.

  • @TitParty So, that doesn't mean there's a correlation like the left wants everyone to believe. I don't think for one moment that the cross hairs meant to shoot anyone. It may not have been the smartest thing she could have done, but I don't buy the left's rhetoric they're using for political gamesmanship. He was deranged and no one knows if he even saw that. His friends have said he wasn't political at all. So, does anyone really know? I think not.  I'm not a Republican either.

  • @da324 Sarah Palin is de facto leader of right wingers and bears at least moral responsibility for the language and consequences of their speech. There have been numerous calls to tone down the violent speech yet they chose to ignore the calls of reason or outright mock them. Combine that with numerous documented cases of right wing extremists who attempted or committed murder stoked by right wing rhetoric and you have a strong reason for laying part of blame on the leaders of right wingers.

  • @TitParty Look BOTH parties have people who spew what you speak of. It's not a left right issue. That's the bullshit they feed the masses to keep them divided. Listen, the left does not give a shit about you. The right doesn't give a shit either. They work together to keep the public willfully ignorant to the issues that really matter. They both rob us, they just do it in different ways. One thing they don't want is a populace capable of critical thinking. That would end their game.

  • @da324 It's not a left right issue? Name one instance of political violence coming from Left. Where is this left wing hatred?

    And no, I politely disagree with you, Democrats and Liberals are on my side: HC reform, gay rights, sane gun control, DREAM act, no tax cuts for the rich, Wall Street reforms, environment protection, etc, etc ...

    Dont draw parallels to right, there arent any.

  • @TitParty Look I don't buy into the left right bullshit. I told you it only divides the nation. Do you honestly believe that's by accident? You're so caught up in the lefts rhetoric you can't think straight. Your party is continuing the same screwed up policies as the last numbnut's. I don't know how old you are, but I'm 47. And I'm old enough to know that this country has gotten worse as I've gotten older. This administration's deficit will make GWB's look like childsplay, all planned!

  • @da324 Name few Con policies that benefited the country in past 10 years. Name them.

  • @da324 Wanna argue your point? Name conservative policies which benefited the country in the last 10 years. I dare you, name few.

  • @TitParty I never said there were any. I'm saying that they are working together to continue the same bad policies. Obama promised to roll back the Bush tax cuts, repeal the Patriot Act, close Gitmo, etc. Has he done it? No, and he has no plans to because his OWNERS don't want him to. These insane policies are bankrupting us, which in turn will put more wealth and power into the hands of the bankers who fund these figure heads. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

  • @da324 Obama promised to roll back the Bush tax cuts??!! Yes, and he tried really erally hard to take them out. Guess who stonewalled him? How can you honestly blame Democrats for Bush tax cuts? I ask you directly.

  • @TitParty .I didn;'t blame the tax cuts on th Democrats, but Obama promised to get rid of the Bush tax cuts and he hasn't. Continuing on with the same policies is not "change", not in my book anyway. The Dems have controlled both The House of Representatives and the Senate for Obama's whole tenure. He's had the majority in both on his side. Please, do tell who "stonewalled" him.

  • @da324 59 votes in Senate, not enough to break filibuster. You blame Dems for that? How about you blame Cons for wanting to extend tax cuts to rich? And again, name few Con policies that benefited the country in past 10 years.

  • @TitParty The Dem's controlled the Senate, so, if they didn't get the 60 votes they needed, it's their fault. "And again", I've already answered your last question. You're to busy trying to prove yourself that you're not listenening. The Dem's platform in 2004 was we'll stop the war if we control the house. They passed every proposal Bush put in front of them. Obama promsed to end the war and he's expanded it. Your party is no different than the right, only in your mind, not in reality.

  • @da324 its people like you who are going to help save this country... you actually look at facts.. not just some right/left b.s. when.. im sorry.. but the differences between the two groups arent clear to me.. thats why it doesnt make any sense when when listen to John Jackson say he wants to move troops into Afghanistan, but Jack Johnson argues that it would be best to move into Iran...

    The American people go.... "uhhhh.. heh what? oh, shit the Jersey Shore is on!"

  • @da324 There were 59 Dem votes in Senate, not enough to break filibuster. You blame Dems for Cons not wanting to compromise? Obama promsed to end the Iraq War, he did. He was very clear on Afgan, with which I dont personally agree on. Compare this to Cons who wanted to stay in Iraq.

    I dont see you answer what Con policies that benefited the country.

  • @TitParty and if our country is spending money to pull the country out of a recession... first i want you to tell me where the money came from.. second i want you to tell me what we have to do to obtain it.. and third i want you to tell me where the money is going.. this should be a good exercise for you since nobody else can figure it out

  • @jonjon1189 You've got it! 1. The privately owned Federal Reserve prints maniplulated fiat money. 2. That creates more debt for every man, woman, and child. 3. We have a good idea where it goes, mainly corporations (both foriegn and domestic) and their banker buddies (ie bailouts, etc). Since they have no congressional oversight, we don't know for certain where all of our tax dollars go. The Feds are the cancer of all our problems and we CANNOT spend our way out of debt. Oxymoron for sure.

  • @TitParty You haven't read shit I've typed. The DEMS had control of the house and Senate. They had the votes to break the filibuster and they didn't. I've answered your last question; I guess you didn't read that either. The left had control of the house and the senate for 8 friggin years and did absolutely nothing with it except continue the same policies that are bankrupting this nation. How's that kool-aid?

  • @da324 Ok, name the Rebublican Senator who was going to vote in favor on repealing tax cuts.

    The 60th vote that is. Im sorry, I must have missed your answer. Please state it again clearly.

    Left did nothing? First, they controlled the legislature for 4, not 8 years.  You want me to repeat the things they have accomplished again?

  • @da324 strange that they did not cut unnecessary military programs. Or start the DREAM Act despite that some of us do not need it.;-)

  • @cris750 You're right! Even though most of us don't need these programs we all have to pay for them. I guess I'm supposed to sing Kumbya while I'm being screwed.

  • @TitParty Well how about Obama pressing toward a bailout in which the moneys whereabouts were unknown after distribution? Is this not worse than the tax cuts that the Bush administration passed? Or how about the projected $9 trillion spending plan? Look Im not defending the right or the left on this one because the truth is they do the same shit. True conservative values mean SMALL GOVERNMENT.. everyones a goddam democrat its all just an act

  • @jonjon1189 Please provide source to your claims.

    Government is spending money to pull out country out of recession. Very different to Bush wasting surplus on tax cuts.

    And no, you are defending the cons. Small government? Where has it worked? Example?

  • @TitParty i have the sources but youtube wont let me post links? so type this in youtube: Obama bailout

    its the first vid

    and this is google: obama 9 trillion

    And lmao! Did you just ask where has small government worked? How about anytime before the first World War.. you know the thing that Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, etc. came up with? before Woodrow Wilson and his damn 14 points.. our world policing.. its a DEMOCRATIC belief.. let me repeat that D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T-I-C

  • @jonjon1189 You have very idealized view of past. Before the first World War women, blacks, mexicans didnt have rights. Hardly D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T-I-C society.

  • @TitParty just like tax cuts, bailouts, and health care... the degree to which the state intervenes is the difference between conservatives (which means conserving the Constitution and sticking with old beliefs) and liberals (a new way of thinking).. liberals want the government to become more involved.. but see.. heres the paradox we face today.. BOTH GROUPS WANT THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVED.. its socially paralyzing.. and it would be wise of you to realize that

  • @TitParty You can't spend your way at of a recession? Here's what that equates to. You're deep in financial shit, but instead of trying to budget and get it under control, you think it's best to spend your way out of trouble. Anyone who believes that is delusional. Also, when in our countries history did we thrive? Was it when our government was smaller, or, the new montrocity? The larger the govt gets the more they control it's populace. The govt does not know what's best for me.

  • @da324 Wanna analogy? You are really sick. Instead of spending money on doctor, you sit at home and let nature take its course. Govt doesnt operate like a family budget.

    Govt too large? Ok, what do you want to cut?

  • @TitParty Explain to me how spending phoney money stimulates the economy? I suggest you do some research on the privately owned Federal Reserve who controls the money supply. Everytime they print more money two things happen. We get further in debt to them as a nation, and inflation kicks in. Inflation is a hidden tax to steal more of our money. Is the debt going down? I would slowly phase out all unconstitutional programs and there are a bunch of them. The leaches wouldn't like it.

  • @da324 "I would slowly phase out all unconstitutional programs and there are a bunch of them" Please name a few specifics and how much they would save.

  • @TitParty Most all government programs are unconstitutional, especially social ones. Governments only have what they take from the people, nothing more. The dumber the populace the easier they are to manipultae. They want us dependent on them for that very reason. That was not this countries intent. Name a large government that's not corrupt, just one. Govts are power mongers who want obidient slaves who don't question anything. Want me to answer questions? Give me the same consideration.

  • @da324 The social programs are CONSTITUTIONAL. Declaration: "He has refused his Assent to Laws,the most wholesome and necessary for the PUBLIC GOOD." & "We the People,....insure domestic tranquility....,promote the GENERAL WELFARE....our POSTERITY...".

  • @da324 government that's not corrupt? Its a nearly impossible question to answer, but I can tell you what governments I hold in esteem: Finland, Norway, Netherlands, Australia, Germany, etc. The types typically refered to as Social Democracies.

    Dont like the military expansion? Neither does left. Join forces, reduce the programs you both disagree on: overseas military, DHS, TSA.

  • @TitParty and btw i just saw your comment on the blacks not having rights before world war 1 and that its not a democratic belief.. yea.. thats why i said our government AFTER WW1 became democratic.. BEFORE WW1 it was conservative.. like i said.. do you even listen?

  • @jonjon1189 This was in response to small government before WWI not being a very good government to strive for in modern society..

  • @TitParty You are right. It was a horrible belief, but true conservatives believe in the constitution and the constitution states that ALL men are created equal. There was a huge amount of racism, but that doesn't mean it was a conservative viewpoint. It was a social problem that our country had to go through. What I'm trying to say is that Liberals obviously like to go across sees as much modern day "Conservatives" do. Obama was deploying troops to Afghanistan... why? There is no difference

  • @jonjon1189 Obama was deploying troops to Afghanistan, correct. Many liberals are unhappy, including myself. Afghanistan is a blackhole and dangerously close to Pakistan with nukes, that maybe the main reason. Join the Libs in reducing military expenditures and overseas military if you believe in that. There are a lot of libs who are very keen on that.

  • @TitParty Hell yea! That's what my next president, Ron Paul, is all about. He is a republican in the House of Representatives and he wants to remove every single troop from the countries that we occupy.

  • @TitParty between left and right nowadays. The tea party, however, is completely different than any republican you've seen in the past 30 years. They are true conservatives.. so when somebody equates the word republican with them it makes you think of the awful things that Bush and Regan did to this country, but its really just a huge movement that's going on right now to revert this country to its original beliefs.

  • @TitParty The left doesn't like military expansion? Are you kidding me? The left has done nothing to stop our nation building, nothing. I'm not interested in what the left has to sell anymore than the right. And I'm not into socialism of any sort. As stated before, I can do my thinking for myself. This country is a Constitutional Republic where all laws are supposed to benefit everyone equally. There's a couple Dems and a few Republicans who get that. I'll support those ideals and principles.

  • @da324

    You are blaming left for not stopping Right's agenda enough? Dude, they withdrew your ass from Iraq. What happened to blaming those who got your ass in there, huh? Remember those huge antiwar rallies? Against Bush and Cons? Dont want to compromise or work together with people of other convictions? Fine, have a good day.

  • @TitParty We are not out of Iraq. We are building permanent military bases there and have no intentions of leaving. We're nation building You lean so far to the left you can't look at anything objectlively. I do blame the RepubliCONS, but you seem to think the DeomocRAT'S hands are clean. And what about Afghanistan? ObAAAAAma has increased the fighting there. I've told you BOTH partes are to blame. The right started it and the left continues the SAME policies. Are you friggin blind?

  • @da324 Here both parties have warhawks. Both are to blame. Both parties also have good individuals.

  • @cris750 Very few...

  • @TitParty Here's what then-Sen. Barack Obama said on the Senate floor in 2006: "The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance the government's reckless fiscal policies." And now what does he want to do? Raise the debt ceiling. This is why I don't buy into the BS from BOTH parties

  • @da324 Before I reply why govt is spending today, please tell me:

    in 2000 Cons got budget surplus and 6 years of economic (at least overtly) stability. Why was raising cap even needed in 2006?

  • @TitParty  It wasn't needed and the quote I just sent you from Obama was on the button. Now, he's doing the SAME thing the last administration did that he was critical of. Like I said, these people are hand picked to fulfill an agenda. And the agenda does not benefit the average American. They are thieves of the highest order and we are on the hook for their shenanighans.

  • @da324 It wasnt needed in 2006 that is why Obama was against it. Now, he got 2008 with massive debt accumulated by Cons government AND a financial crisis. When private sector contracts and workers are being laid off, staying aside and doing nothing creates a cascade of bankruptcies and unemployment. Imagine the consequences if GM was to fall. In this climate government is the only entity able to sustain employment. Compare that with WWII debt, in terms of GDP (available on net).

  • @TitParty It's not needed now either. The deficit has risen more in the last 2 years than GWB'S last 4. Companies are not to big to fail, unless those companies have ties to the Federal Reserve Bank. They're buddies, they're not going to,let their buds fail. No, they print more money which devalues the dollar more in turn causing inflation. You've been led to believe that government's are our savior and that's not true. They got us into this mess and we pay for it, And you think we need more?

  • @da324 GWB started 2004 with stable economy, not an economic collapse. Obama got 2008 with financial crisis, automakers going bankrupt, rising unemployment, and two wars. It took Cons 8 years to fuck up country and how can you blame Obama for not fixing it in 2 years?

    You think we are spending too much? What do you think would happen if GM went under and banks would fail? Private sector failed, failed hard. Like it or not, its government's term to step in, like it did in 30-40's. 

  • @TitParty I'm so sick of people saying it took the Reps 8 years to fuck things up when your darling's controlled BOTH houses for 6 of the last 10 years. They did NOTHING but go along with GWB for 4 years and have contnued the SAME policies the last 2. "Like it or not" both parties created this mess. We don't need MORE of that shit. Fuck the corporations! They buy Congress and get those big tax cuts you hate so much and send jobs away. And we're supposed to pay for their ineptness?

  • @TitParty I'm so sick of people saying it took the Reps 8 years to fuck things up when your darling's controlled BOTH houses for 6 of the last 10 years. They did NOTHING but go along with GWB for 4 years and have contnued the SAME policies the last 2. "Like it or not" both parties created this mess. We don't need MORE of that shit. Fuck the corporations! They buy Congress and get those big tax cuts you hate so much and send jobs away. And we're supposed to pay for their ineptness?

  • @da324 You have to be careful with facts: Dems gained legislature control in 2006, NOT 2004. For 6 years, Cons controlled entire government. Where do you get your facts from?

    And yes, we are responsible for the well being of this country. We chose Conservative leaders which pulled back safety nets to allow corporations to run wild and as a result of our choices we must pay. I can remind you which party wants no control over corps and which wants sane controls.