The good thing is Eidolon presents well-thought statements. So he might as well be a wise computer or whatever. I see he is a joke since he advocates pacificism.
Funny how spam/trolls suddenly "appeared" when the subject shifted to scientology. They always flock to where they feel "persecuted" and either try to distract or give misinformation and start pointless arguments. Don't feed them, their brains have been rewired to reject rational thought.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
it's looking more and more like Eidolon is just a part of the war on scientology, an AI probably wouldn't post an anonymous video in his favorites AND answer if he knows about it. When he mentions February 10th it's also very... suspicious.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
But why must people rely on a fantasy to discuss serious things? It just shows how childish everyone is. And as for "clogging" the forums with "disbelief," you're contradicting yourself by implying that skepticism isn't an idea to be shared. Some challenge the topics at hand - Scientology, whatever, I find it boring - I prefer to challenge the method - a self-aware robot, much more interesting whether real or not.
You are confusing the message with the mean of communication. Often fantasy is used to communicate about serious topics, like greek miths that still hold a psychological meaning even if you stop believing in zeus. There is nothing wrong with that, as long as it serves its purpose
There is a fundamental difference: This guy claims to be an actual AI. If you look at his early videos, he didn't start this to discuss serious things. He started it as a hoax.
i still miss where's the problem in using trivial means for discussing serious things. Things should not be taken too seriously. That prevents the possibility of being sent to ethics.
The ultimate problem is that a lot of people are idiots. It's not the guy making the video that annoys me - I like him. I'm annoyed by the people who scream, "It's real! It's real! A real robot from the future!" without anything to back up the assumption. Unfortunately, these people comprise most of humanity. They see Jesus in pieces of toast, and I'm honestly just sick of it.
And now we've given them the ability to downvote and hide any posts they disagree with.
Where are all of these people screaming it's real? When I look 90% of the comments on these videos, I see something unusual for youtube...people actually engaging in intelligent meaningful discussions. You're arguing about nothing, with no one, with these weak and angry sentiments that I predicted would commence the moment the "good" name of L. Ron was besmirched.
No one is screaming OMG ROBOT FROM FUTURE.
we're engaging in this wonderful discussion about human nature, religion, and the future.
well if you actually watched the videos instead of "appearing" as soon as scientology was rightfully insulted, you'd know that he's made it very clear from the beginning that it's a joke, saying so in numerous videos.
Also, if you actually watched the first video you'd see that he posits some very interesting questions about faith-based religion and its place in our history and future. It has since prompted some very intelligent discussion.
Why does everyone think I'm pro-Scientology? Fuck Scientology and L. Ron's chubby ass. If that's your only line of reasoning, then you're at an impasse.
if you actually read my posts, you'd see that I made numerous responses to your various statements, having nothing to do with you being pro-scientology. heh, this is like arguing with a 6-year-old.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
One more time: Please tell me that no one REALLY THINKS this is a REAL A.I. You know this is an animation with a synthesized voice, right? The voice is called Saul, and it comes with ProTools. The description contains an accurate transcript because the user must TYPE THE WORDS in order for the synthesizer to speak them. We can't get a Mars robot over a rock, let alone create something like this. Just hold on to reality, please, everyone.
So at the very least he is extremely reasonable (author)and I would very much like to hear his opinions on most of the matters he discusses. Hopefully no one believes this is real, but also I hope that some take his messages to heart.
Digeridude said: "Perhaps he's faking a reasonable nature in his attempt to imitate a machine". Right, cuz everybody knows machines are reasonable.... wait-
Digeridude, WHAT??? Its a SYNTHESIZED voice? Are you SURE?? All this time I thought it was a natural voice of some bald guy who painted himself red and blue and stayed really still in front of the camera! Oh man, you blow my mind!!
P.S. Is not Saul smartass, I tried it, doesnt sound a bit like it. Inform yourself here: eidolonai dot com/forum/topic/12?replies=12
When typically responding to posts on this subject, I usually start off with >>> [REPEAT POST] "No one should ever be disqualified for their religion. Even the funny ones. Like all of them." - Bill Maher ... so what separates a cult from a religion? Number of practitioners? Duration of existence? Doesn't seem that the verifiable truth of its scripture, or the demonstrable falsehoods or cultural inequalities of its scripture, are ever considered as validating or invalidating distinctions ...
However, what EidolonTLP has said has made me rethink my previous repeatedly posted statement -- when a religion's primary purpose is the abject *BREAKING* of its followers, the question of `What is the religion's primary purpose?` should be relevant above all other objective questions concerning the religion's validating or invalidating distinctions ...
Its not the religion they care about destroying. They could give a fuck about the religion itself, all of them are bullshit so this isn't too huge of a stretch by comparison.
This is about taking down the church. The church that suppresses information and its followers.
As a composer myself, I must say I enjoy SOAS's music.
I also approve of Anonymous' actions, and I find Scientology particularly disgusting. However, I feel this was a rather unnecessary question as Eidolon has an Anonymous video in his favorites.
I see, so him being AGAISNT Scientology isn't good enough? He finds flaw in violent action?
Sorry, but Anon. has said to it's members to be peaceful, and Eidolon here is agreeing with Anon...so your problem is....
AmberwiseTheWise 3 years ago
Whoever your programmer is, he made your opinions strangely resonant with stupid humans I know. This AI is as real as Thetans and the Easter Bunny.
acousmas 3 years ago
Do you not have faith in Anonymous, or the Internet?
thecakeisalie58 4 years ago
Same shit you've been eating that your mom feeds you... idiot. Watch all the videos before you make a fool of yourself.
phdComic 4 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
ok someone here inform me, WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS LOAD OF BULL SHIT
morekiller 4 years ago
What are you talking about? What do you mean?
CybernautZero 4 years ago
The good thing is Eidolon presents well-thought statements. So he might as well be a wise computer or whatever. I see he is a joke since he advocates pacificism.
Gubbinz 4 years ago
After all, violence solves everything HURRR.
NielsDouglas 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Aw, Come On! it is fun to make-believe in Eidolon AI.
I kissed Lisa Marie Presley at a House of Scientology--
Believe it or Not!
Estamio 4 years ago
Wow, Michael Jackson pretended to kiss her to.
TheSpiderMind 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how could you know if your opinions are or not biased towards what your programmers wants your conlusions to be.
mobugs 4 years ago
Yes... definately... do not...
do those things you mentioned...
dennist3hmenace 4 years ago
Funny how spam/trolls suddenly "appeared" when the subject shifted to scientology. They always flock to where they feel "persecuted" and either try to distract or give misinformation and start pointless arguments. Don't feed them, their brains have been rewired to reject rational thought.
foundring 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it's looking more and more like Eidolon is just a part of the war on scientology, an AI probably wouldn't post an anonymous video in his favorites AND answer if he knows about it. When he mentions February 10th it's also very... suspicious.
yesterday2221 4 years ago
xenu would be so proud
foundring 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have a penis!
superdevon5 4 years ago
No,you have to post "i has a penis"
knifeofspaghetti 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
But why must people rely on a fantasy to discuss serious things? It just shows how childish everyone is. And as for "clogging" the forums with "disbelief," you're contradicting yourself by implying that skepticism isn't an idea to be shared. Some challenge the topics at hand - Scientology, whatever, I find it boring - I prefer to challenge the method - a self-aware robot, much more interesting whether real or not.
Digeridude 4 years ago
You are confusing the message with the mean of communication. Often fantasy is used to communicate about serious topics, like greek miths that still hold a psychological meaning even if you stop believing in zeus. There is nothing wrong with that, as long as it serves its purpose
nawaxo 4 years ago 3
There is a fundamental difference: This guy claims to be an actual AI. If you look at his early videos, he didn't start this to discuss serious things. He started it as a hoax.
Digeridude 4 years ago
i still miss where's the problem in using trivial means for discussing serious things. Things should not be taken too seriously. That prevents the possibility of being sent to ethics.
nawaxo 4 years ago 3
The ultimate problem is that a lot of people are idiots. It's not the guy making the video that annoys me - I like him. I'm annoyed by the people who scream, "It's real! It's real! A real robot from the future!" without anything to back up the assumption. Unfortunately, these people comprise most of humanity. They see Jesus in pieces of toast, and I'm honestly just sick of it.
And now we've given them the ability to downvote and hide any posts they disagree with.
Digeridude 4 years ago
Where are all of these people screaming it's real? When I look 90% of the comments on these videos, I see something unusual for youtube...people actually engaging in intelligent meaningful discussions. You're arguing about nothing, with no one, with these weak and angry sentiments that I predicted would commence the moment the "good" name of L. Ron was besmirched.
No one is screaming OMG ROBOT FROM FUTURE.
we're engaging in this wonderful discussion about human nature, religion, and the future.
foundring 4 years ago 2
"This guy claims to be an actual AI."
well if you actually watched the videos instead of "appearing" as soon as scientology was rightfully insulted, you'd know that he's made it very clear from the beginning that it's a joke, saying so in numerous videos.
Also, if you actually watched the first video you'd see that he posits some very interesting questions about faith-based religion and its place in our history and future. It has since prompted some very intelligent discussion.
eat it up, troll
foundring 4 years ago 2
Why does everyone think I'm pro-Scientology? Fuck Scientology and L. Ron's chubby ass. If that's your only line of reasoning, then you're at an impasse.
Digeridude 4 years ago
if you actually read my posts, you'd see that I made numerous responses to your various statements, having nothing to do with you being pro-scientology. heh, this is like arguing with a 6-year-old.
foundring 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If you actually read my posts, you'll know I wasn't talking to you.
Digeridude 4 years ago
you sure you're not a scientologist?
you should investigate it, you'll fit right in.
foundring 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Because I DON'T believe in supernatural crap? Where's the logic in that?
Digeridude 4 years ago
Very interesting and thoughtful commentary.
The second paragraph is probably the most concise description of what is wrong with organized scientology that I have seen.
Thank you.
LilacM00n 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
One more time: Please tell me that no one REALLY THINKS this is a REAL A.I. You know this is an animation with a synthesized voice, right? The voice is called Saul, and it comes with ProTools. The description contains an accurate transcript because the user must TYPE THE WORDS in order for the synthesizer to speak them. We can't get a Mars robot over a rock, let alone create something like this. Just hold on to reality, please, everyone.
Fucking humans.
Digeridude 4 years ago
Most of his messages are true to facts.
So at the very least he is extremely reasonable (author)and I would very much like to hear his opinions on most of the matters he discusses. Hopefully no one believes this is real, but also I hope that some take his messages to heart.
look2leap4 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Perhaps he's faking a reasonable nature in his attempt to imitate a machine. Personally I disagree with a lot of what he says.
Digeridude 4 years ago
Digeridude said: "Perhaps he's faking a reasonable nature in his attempt to imitate a machine". Right, cuz everybody knows machines are reasonable.... wait-
bluepill2 4 years ago
d(^.^)b
Kau700 4 years ago
Digeridude, WHAT??? Its a SYNTHESIZED voice? Are you SURE?? All this time I thought it was a natural voice of some bald guy who painted himself red and blue and stayed really still in front of the camera! Oh man, you blow my mind!!
P.S. Is not Saul smartass, I tried it, doesnt sound a bit like it. Inform yourself here: eidolonai dot com/forum/topic/12?replies=12
bluepill2 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're lying because there is no Saul voice. It's Paul and I misspelled it.
Digeridude 4 years ago
lafayette ronald hubbard, you are soon to be forgotten, tossed into the trash bin of history. lisa mcpherson, you shall be remembered.
jnycnuk 4 years ago 2
Thank you Eidolon TLP!
erkd1 4 years ago
wow! very cool vid!
Ironhead097 4 years ago
Eidolon,
I'm flattered that you broadcast my music - thank you ever so much :)
SOASJapanSociety 4 years ago 9
I predict many cults will go down more or less in order of wackiness, as more people wake up and make a stand.
JoeyPistone 4 years ago 4
EIDOLON FOR PRESIDENT!!!!! He'd at least be better than what we have. lol :)
What do you think, Eidolon? Would you make a good president and what would you do with the country if you were elected president?
-Mike
Hefner0116 4 years ago 4
Good on you.
Feb 10th will be incredible
mrjackson2007 4 years ago 2
\o/
Mehulasi 4 years ago
What I like about Eidolon is that he never gives half-assed answers. Scientology shall go down.
bluepill2 4 years ago 4
When typically responding to posts on this subject, I usually start off with >>> [REPEAT POST] "No one should ever be disqualified for their religion. Even the funny ones. Like all of them." - Bill Maher ... so what separates a cult from a religion? Number of practitioners? Duration of existence? Doesn't seem that the verifiable truth of its scripture, or the demonstrable falsehoods or cultural inequalities of its scripture, are ever considered as validating or invalidating distinctions ...
AvangionQ 4 years ago
However, what EidolonTLP has said has made me rethink my previous repeatedly posted statement -- when a religion's primary purpose is the abject *BREAKING* of its followers, the question of `What is the religion's primary purpose?` should be relevant above all other objective questions concerning the religion's validating or invalidating distinctions ...
AvangionQ 4 years ago 2
Its not the religion they care about destroying. They could give a fuck about the religion itself, all of them are bullshit so this isn't too huge of a stretch by comparison.
This is about taking down the church. The church that suppresses information and its followers.
fenristhewlf 4 years ago
frist
Jowb1212 4 years ago
Be very weary of the 10th of February.
Good video, once again, Eidolon
Tenetri 4 years ago 4
that south park episode is so classic.
radd, I sure hope that was sarcasm. cue scientology fanboys/apologists....
foundring 4 years ago
I sense high Theton levels on this page. You will all feel the wrath of lord Xenu and the Mighty Tom Cruise.
RaddNiner 4 years ago 16
I lol'd.
QReaper 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Scientology is the world's only hope.
RaddNiner 4 years ago
rofl and will end with a major fight between Tom Cruise and Bruce Willis
mrcoldheart 4 years ago 4
Well, LRH was a master of 734 different professions, and an action hero.
TheSpiderMind 4 years ago
As a composer myself, I must say I enjoy SOAS's music.
I also approve of Anonymous' actions, and I find Scientology particularly disgusting. However, I feel this was a rather unnecessary question as Eidolon has an Anonymous video in his favorites.
NaralosJester 4 years ago 3