Nutrition is now a required course in all serious medical schools. Your information is out of date. You just can't treat EVERYTHING with a single treatment, period, and if you think about that for a while you will know that it is true. Granted that in many cases it could help it can't help EVERYTHING - that simply does not make sense.
@PaulKJHarris, please provide proof of that. IF a med school does teach nutrition, it is a single three-hour course, according to doctors I know. Paul, think about this: IF the zapper can wake up your immune system, as Dr. Clark found, OF COURSE it could be the single help required for all kinds of health challenges. Our immune system is the basis of our health protection and recovery.
Hulda Clark may have been a super-nice person but when it comes to medicine she was simply wrong. You just can't cure everything with a single treatment. I have NO stocks in "big pharma", NO friends in "D.C." I just care about the truth. If a website does not have the "H.O.N." seal on it then it can not be trusted. RIP Hulda, you were a sweet person but you were still wrong.
@PaulKJHarris I cannot cure anything, but I can certainly tell you that your BODY can cure far more than you would believe. It is designed to heal itself. Even a grade one child knows that "you are what you eat," yet "real doctors" do not even study nutrition in most med schools. Dr. Clark did not heal people, she just helped us see how to remove the toxins and parasites, and give our bodies the resources to HEAL THEMSELVES. See her ideas for free at HuldaClarkActionPlan(dot)com
I find it amazing there are such negative comments posted about Dr Hulda Clark by people who seem to have a more "emotional" stand point than factual medical one. She was not a main Stream Practitioner and had a very different approach to health than big pharmaceutical puppet doctors? She seemed lovely and very sincere to help people and further her research without funding assistance. She was a true humanitarian and her findings about health were so right, despite being non traditional.
@ad7077 lucky you! We see that she was not about corporate greed profit and fame. Her methods are wonderfully natural and nutrition is the key we think too. The food now days is for profit and "commercial value" not nutritional value. sadly most are unaware because it "looks great". How we cook it adds further to the nutritional depletion, especially the microwave according to some research. Diet of 50% raw food is good. Dr's mostly know so little & overlook nutrition & lifestyle, it's wrong!
Your opinion of this QUACK is just sad. She was a danger to many and just because you believe her cockamamie theories doesn't mean they are true. If you think they are I challenge you to do this: publish a peer-reviewed paper. Prepare for the academic equivalent of getting roasted alive because that is what is going to happen.
@PaulKJHarris < Any time someone comes up with a cure that's cheap and easy for the patient, our establishment is ready to get rid of such person. With a PhD and ND, why would Dr. Clark would like a quack image.
Is it not possible, the evidence leveled against her was all about making her look that way ? Saddam Hussein also had WMD according to your friends in DC !
@PaulKJHarris , the "peers" are other cogs in the same Big Pharma and Big Medicine machine that is set up to prevent any competition to the mainstream disease industry. Cheap, safe cures like Dr. Clark's and others threaten the obscene profits of the cancer and drug industries, so they make sure that no true scientifically honest research on these cures is ever published. Fortunately, one can test Dr. Clark's work at home for low cost, and find as I have that it really WORKS! She saved my life.
@kravar , Dr. Clark's methods actually saved MY life from cancer. I went to be tested after I felt better, and we became friends for the next 14 years. She was no fraud, more like a medical Mother Teresa... Arthur
Nutrition is now a required course in all serious medical schools. Your information is out of date. You just can't treat EVERYTHING with a single treatment, period, and if you think about that for a while you will know that it is true. Granted that in many cases it could help it can't help EVERYTHING - that simply does not make sense.
PaulKJHarris 4 months ago
@PaulKJHarris, please provide proof of that. IF a med school does teach nutrition, it is a single three-hour course, according to doctors I know. Paul, think about this: IF the zapper can wake up your immune system, as Dr. Clark found, OF COURSE it could be the single help required for all kinds of health challenges. Our immune system is the basis of our health protection and recovery.
ad7077 1 month ago
Hulda Clark may have been a super-nice person but when it comes to medicine she was simply wrong. You just can't cure everything with a single treatment. I have NO stocks in "big pharma", NO friends in "D.C." I just care about the truth. If a website does not have the "H.O.N." seal on it then it can not be trusted. RIP Hulda, you were a sweet person but you were still wrong.
PaulKJHarris 4 months ago
@PaulKJHarris I cannot cure anything, but I can certainly tell you that your BODY can cure far more than you would believe. It is designed to heal itself. Even a grade one child knows that "you are what you eat," yet "real doctors" do not even study nutrition in most med schools. Dr. Clark did not heal people, she just helped us see how to remove the toxins and parasites, and give our bodies the resources to HEAL THEMSELVES. See her ideas for free at HuldaClarkActionPlan(dot)com
ad7077 4 months ago
I find it amazing there are such negative comments posted about Dr Hulda Clark by people who seem to have a more "emotional" stand point than factual medical one. She was not a main Stream Practitioner and had a very different approach to health than big pharmaceutical puppet doctors? She seemed lovely and very sincere to help people and further her research without funding assistance. She was a true humanitarian and her findings about health were so right, despite being non traditional.
OlBlueshound 4 months ago
@OlBlueshound , I totally agree. In person she was very humble and kind. And her methods saved my life!
ad7077 4 months ago
@ad7077 lucky you! We see that she was not about corporate greed profit and fame. Her methods are wonderfully natural and nutrition is the key we think too. The food now days is for profit and "commercial value" not nutritional value. sadly most are unaware because it "looks great". How we cook it adds further to the nutritional depletion, especially the microwave according to some research. Diet of 50% raw food is good. Dr's mostly know so little & overlook nutrition & lifestyle, it's wrong!
OlBlueshound 4 months ago
MY friends in D.C? Presume much? They were NOT my friends. I stand by my statement.
PaulKJHarris 5 months ago
Your opinion of this QUACK is just sad. She was a danger to many and just because you believe her cockamamie theories doesn't mean they are true. If you think they are I challenge you to do this: publish a peer-reviewed paper. Prepare for the academic equivalent of getting roasted alive because that is what is going to happen.
PaulKJHarris 6 months ago
@PaulKJHarris < Any time someone comes up with a cure that's cheap and easy for the patient, our establishment is ready to get rid of such person. With a PhD and ND, why would Dr. Clark would like a quack image.
Is it not possible, the evidence leveled against her was all about making her look that way ? Saddam Hussein also had WMD according to your friends in DC !
Zeno1999 5 months ago
@PaulKJHarris , the "peers" are other cogs in the same Big Pharma and Big Medicine machine that is set up to prevent any competition to the mainstream disease industry. Cheap, safe cures like Dr. Clark's and others threaten the obscene profits of the cancer and drug industries, so they make sure that no true scientifically honest research on these cures is ever published. Fortunately, one can test Dr. Clark's work at home for low cost, and find as I have that it really WORKS! She saved my life.
ad7077 4 months ago
Both got good skin for elder folk !!!
ThePhantomLash 8 months ago 2
She was a wonderful person and worthy to remember and honor with a tribute. Great JOB!
LaydeeLiberty1234 1 year ago
I don't see why you two are smiling so much about her death.
totakeke 2 years ago
@totakeke, they're not smiling about her death. They're smiling about having known her and about what she did to advance health.
sunlitstormclouds 1 year ago 2
@sunlitstormclouds
they should be because her "treatment" is big scam
kravar 9 months ago
@kravar , Dr. Clark's methods actually saved MY life from cancer. I went to be tested after I felt better, and we became friends for the next 14 years. She was no fraud, more like a medical Mother Teresa... Arthur
ad7077 8 months ago
Cheers!
SuperFantasticUltra 2 years ago 2