@akoryanii It's beautiful because it's a different kind of beauty. A modern, 20th century beauty. Ik it's hard for some people to find and recognize the pure beauty in works like these, but those people who make comments like "beautiful" can see it.
I wonder, does anyone else find this interpretation a bit too subjective? Stretching the notation is fine, but it doesn't seem like he's following the composer's ideas very well.
fascinating. but it is in no way random key bashing. the idiom is much like the next step beyond rachmaninov, it seems to me, with tonality even looser. but the general style is very romantic, as seen through the eyes of the 20th century.
@akoryanii Lmfao, i do get where you are coming from but not every bit is horrid, i found that there were a few moments of lyricism and others in which you describe as "mashing" are where the tone clusters appear. I don't like tone clusters unless they are put into context of motivic activity like what Bartok would have done. Is this my favorite of 20th century musc, no. But it's not completely abhorring in my opinion.
@akoryanii It's beautiful because it's a different kind of beauty. A modern, 20th century beauty. Ik it's hard for some people to find and recognize the pure beauty in works like these, but those people who make comments like "beautiful" can see it.
Starbirdy9999 1 month ago
Very modern and electric!
MrDemetrio135 1 month ago
I wonder, does anyone else find this interpretation a bit too subjective? Stretching the notation is fine, but it doesn't seem like he's following the composer's ideas very well.
wetuadjlv 3 months ago
fascinating. but it is in no way random key bashing. the idiom is much like the next step beyond rachmaninov, it seems to me, with tonality even looser. but the general style is very romantic, as seen through the eyes of the 20th century.
a very interesting piece
Strefanasha 4 months ago
@akoryanii Lmfao, i do get where you are coming from but not every bit is horrid, i found that there were a few moments of lyricism and others in which you describe as "mashing" are where the tone clusters appear. I don't like tone clusters unless they are put into context of motivic activity like what Bartok would have done. Is this my favorite of 20th century musc, no. But it's not completely abhorring in my opinion.
somnynightin78 5 months ago
@akoryanii That comment makes no sense.
somnynightin78 5 months ago
awesome
prokosh06 5 months ago
@akoryanii They just seem to have more tolerance then you man ;)
fyrexianoff 5 months ago
2:10 was seizurifically awesome (is that a word? well it is now!)
FrancoLaBraca 9 months ago
1st 6 bars.... 0____0 da FUCK?!
chutdigadut 11 months ago
ПІАНІСТУ - НОБЕЛІВСЬКУ ПРЕМІЮ!
MunichKyiv 1 year ago
truely amazing!
naffanharrison 1 year ago
The weirder the name, the weirder the piece! haha intense music though.
xenekaro 1 year ago 3
WOW
Alu10000 1 year ago
Wow, i usually prefer liszt, rachmaninov and chopin, but this expression here is amazing
Cillitpeng 1 year ago
Wonderful!
AntTheABomb 1 year ago
MARVELOUS! :] It was beautiful! I LOVED it :D
GothicalSOberhauser 1 year ago
Wonderful
FabioThePianist 1 year ago 3
spectucular - definitely worth learning - I'm trying to catch up with all your posts atm! keep up the great work :D
thetamman 2 years ago 7
Masterpiece.
Janzzz23 2 years ago 17
So much angst, and then a surprising dash of good natured delicacy. A very good composition :)
Lukecash12 2 years ago 8
extremely impressive playing - reminiscent of the inspiration of horowitz's playing of the barber sonata.
kasyapa 2 years ago 4
OMG!
rugby52732 3 years ago 22