@RichKilla86ers No competition. Now there's the Camaro (and challenger if you wanna throw that in there) to compete against. Before that, there was nobody to raise the bar. Same goes for the GT500. They've used the same engine for a long time, now with the ZL1, the GT500 is finally getting an upgrade.
@RichKilla86ers Cuz the Camaro was literally kickin fords ass an was plain faster, was no way the 315hp was keepin up with the 428hp on the camaro, but outta ford mouths themselves i read in a in a 5.0 magazine they made that motor from scratch to directly compete with the Camaro
@Mustang46liters cause Ford and Chevy have been competitors for years and some still choose to still hate on the other... Their both great cars but my opinion is the mustang looks better and it just better. handles better and is faster... and that has nothing to do with me being a Ford guy n oh yea I'm about to buy me one too
I'm just guessing that the two cars were used because one is stick and the other is auto. Anyway, great review. Just wish it was longer cause this guy knows what he's talking about.
im surprised how no one has mentioned yet how fucking awesome ford is at building engines considering they made a 444hp n/a 5.0l v8.....chevy and dodge need 6.0+L's of displacement to do that
@chinchillawrangler your retarded. hp/L means nothing. its all about hp/weight and size. there is a reason why chevy sells the most crate engines, engines are lightweight, reliable, easy to get more power out of, and compact. the 5.0 is a good engine, and weighs about 450lbs.
@xXBurntBaconXx huh? wtf are u smokin? i was poiting out the fact that ford got 444 hp out of a 5.0 v8 while chevy and dodge need 6litres or more to do that....ur goin off on some random shit about weight. that had nothing to do with what i was talking about haha
@chinchillawrangler im not smoking anything, HP/L means nothing unless your european (there insurance is based on engine size), what you want is an engine that is as light as possible, who cares if its 8L in displacement, as long as its light, and makes power.
you can tell they show a different mustang than the one he's actually driving. Seeing him drive there is a glass roof. Outside view of the red mustang there is no glass roof.
I want to know how it can be the return of something it didn't have in the first place this actually has a 5.0 under the hood the fox body just had the name because the 300 v6 was called known as the 4.9
@W4TCH4W That is so true, i`m more of a camaro kinda guy but i can definately say that with the mustang you get more for your money, which is especially important nowadays cuz of the economy.
@DHaJ40 Don't listen to people saying you gotta get a used car first you ain't worth it youll mess it up!!...
If you wanna save money in the long run get a new car... A mustang will be a very good start but if you can afford it go for it..
Although the V6 is better with insurance it is very popular as a teenage ( high school girl car. ) wanna feel badass get the v8 ( Forget that 6k difference well worth it...)
@W4TCH4W Yea I took the V8 for a test run the other day. It was like nothing I ever experienced before. Muscle cars are a different thing and I'm probably going to get the stang.
@DHaJ40 Yea make sure you test drive other cars as well ( it's free :D ) like camaro and challenger they have different uhm.. personalities i should say... Maybe even a subaru wrx sti or mitsubishi evo who knows maybe you will like them better... Don't be biased like most of the guys here every country made good cars one year or another ( For example 1980's was a great year for german cars and 90's went super for japanese and 70's for americans ) just test drive and decide yourself...
Haha what are the odds, I live ON that road, I'll tell you though, it was a pain in the ass going to school every morning, but seeing the view definitely made it worth it. There are loads of sport cars and bikers going up and down all day. :D
Hey... he's not really driving the car from the helicopter view. Notice how there is a moon roof while he talks inside the cabin, and notice that the outside view does not have a moon roof lol
@SOFSoldier1 Hey! Look who's not grounded from his computer any more :) Did your dad let you wash his Challenger SE? Even after you wrote "392" all over it with your favorite crayon?
@katanamast279 If you live anywhere where there's snow, get the STi. If you live in a place where it hardly snows at all, and all-weather control isn't a huge priority, get a Mustang. And prepare to spend lots of money on tires.
@Shorty111R The mustang is perfectly fine in the snow. If you live in a major community plowed relatively well you would be fine even with the stock all seasons. Just use learn the car well enough.
In more rural areas - snow tires would be your friend.
The funnest thing about the 2011 Mustangs, which are GREAT cars. I went to my local dealership to test one out, and I'm in it feeling it out,take it on US-23 get it going then get back go to get out and I realize that the door handle is the same handle in my wifes 2004 Mercury Sable. The chrome handle, its just so odd.
@SOFsoldier1. You know the out of the 15 cars in my grandpa's yard that needs a new transmission 6 are dodge's and 5 are newer than 1999. So you drive your POS dodge. 0 and there are 2 fords and they are each 15 years old.
@331Grabber Has FORD fixed its defective transmissions/shifters/and clutches in the 2011-2012 Mustang GTs yet? tech bulletin under-way and recall in the works
See "2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 1 of 2"
See "2011 mustang defective tranny"
See "2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 2 of 2"
See "2011 Mustang GT - Shifter/Gear Whine"
See "Problematic Getrag MT-82 Transmission 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0L"
I'm pretty much convinced SofSoldiers dad owns a Challenger and he is 15. As soon as he get's out of his special ed class he throws off his Styrofoam helmet and runs in his special shoes, to a computer with huge buttons and spreads the word of Dodge as he eats handfuls sugar from a bag hidden in his room. He then mentally adds a 6.4 liter to his dads six cylinder Challenger and proceeds to assume the identity of his dad. His parents sit quietly in the other room hoping he is watching porn.
@331Grabber I'll have to agree. But I do believe while riding the short bus home he doesn't take off his helmet to lick the windows easier. I believe he keeps it on to make it a challenge and to impress the other retards
The 2011/2012 Hemi 392 Challenger (470HP/470 Ft-lbs) owns both the 2011 Mustang GT and Camaro SS. See "392Drags" on youtube; runs 12.4 bone stock (as fast as BOSS302/GT500) fully loaded, on street tires.
@SOFSoldier1 So how do you know the car in that video is bone stock? Also you know as well as I the Challenger doesn't own the Mustang in ANY category.
V6 vs. V6 = Challenger loses badly. ($20,000 range)
@SOFSoldier1 Way to avoid the subject. Don't worry recalls happen all the time. Dodge also has a history full of them. So I guess you focus on that instead of answering my questions? Again. What do you definitely know about the car in the video that you are touting as proof that the SRT-8 runs 12.44 @ 109? You keep using the "owned" term to compare them. "Owned" isn't the term for a car that runs about the same 1/4 mile time as its competitor. This is why I don't think you're an adult.
@331Grabber Thasts why they were there, junior. All four cars at Infineon were there for Dodge official rating and testing of the first production cars, jackass. Thats why the automatic is rated at 12.4 officially by Dodge on this baseline. Hows your recall for your defective shifters and clutches coming on the 2011 GT?
@SOFSoldier1 Wait! DODGE testing a DODGE car yielded it's best ever 1/4 mile time! With VHT and rollout at a drag strip with the official Dodge guys trying to make a good showing vs no VHT and rollout for the Motor Trend Mustang that did 12.6 - 12.8? You realize Motor Trend and the other real testers don't work for the car manufacturers right? Also since you like to troll race vids you understand how 1/4 mile trap speed works right? The GTs is higher because of a better power to weight ratio.
Pay attention: at DRAGTIMES. com you can put in Make, model, and all "official" ETs.....with timeslips. The best for stock 392 is 12.3...you would know this site well if you actually ever drag raced. The "392Drags" video was taken on NOV 10, 2010 of Dodge doing thier official test and tune for Infineon, where each ran from 12.44-12.67, with the average 12.44.
@331Grabber brilliant retort. Who gives a crap about trap speeds if you lose, and your ET is lower, junior?
Go to "DRAGTIMES. com" for oficial recorded "bests". Meanwhile-let me know how that FORD clutch recall and tech bulletin goes for you and your GT fanboys.
@SOFSoldier1 I'll explain again. Trap speed is affected by power to weight. The Challenger and GT clock close to the same trap speed. Meaning the 470 HP the SRT8 makes is just enough to match the GTs HP to weight ratio. Since they have the same power to weight ratio the car with more optimal gearing and traction should win. So the question is why doesn't the Challenger win? If it's so much better it wouldn't ever post slower times than the GT. But as you and I know so well it does ..... A lot.
@331Grabber really? The Challenger ETs (official 1/4 mi ratings) are higher because the 392 is putting out anywhwere from 422-432 RWHP stock-which means its actually putting out 508-532 Flywheel. (15-20% drivetrain loss)
@SOFSoldier1 Yes really. The BOSS 302 puts out around 480 at the flywheel. That's why it only makes 16 HP less at the wheels but weighs 700 LBS less. Like I said better power to weight ratio.
SRT8 4200 LBS with 432 RWHP = 9.7 LBS per HP.
Mustang GT 3600 LBS with 370 RWHP = 9.7 LBS per HP.
BOSS 302 3600 LBS with 416 RWHP = 8.65 LBS per HP.
Let me help you out then: "392 Challenger vs. 350Z" on YOUTUBE: 12.4 and likewise, go to "DRAGTIMES. com" to see the offical stock best of 12.3 if you need assistance, let us know,
@331Grabber but almost all car reveiwers lied about the camaro ss automatic tranny 0-60 times where they calimed that its faster than the manual and acheived 60 in 4.6s but in reality it took around 5.3
@legendaryspartan92 The auto reviewers also have different rules between them. Like Car and Driver leaves the traction control on during tests. I believe Motor Trend and Road & Track turn it off. I don't remember seeing the auto Camaro run 0-60 faster then the manual. But I admit haven't been paying attention to the auto trans cars. I know it is at a big 26 HP and around 90 LB disadvantage against the 6-Speed Camaro.
@331Grabber Yeah but the problem is that they all claimed the same exact time and they did so immediatly after GM claimed that time and thats why I'm suspisious.
@SOFSoldier1 damn i am so sick of seeing this troll on every Mustang video. The 392 is ridiculously expensive and slower than the Boss 302, the GT500 and the GT350. A few mods to a 5.0 and you're whooping up on a car 15k more expensive no problem. Quit your trolling, no one cares about 392 drags, I'd like to see the big heavy turd take the turn at the end of the track and flip. Or blow out it's shitty independent rear axle the first time you do a burnout.
why does a mustang (unlike other V8's) make a typical bubbeling sound at idle and low rpm when engine rpm is decreasing? best car from america btw, they should sell it in Europe in big numbers!
I am a hardcore Mustang fan to the max, and always will be, but I just gotta ask Ford: WHY DID YOUR DESIGNERS DESIGN THE REAR END OF THE 2005-present MUSTANGS SO F'N UGLY?????? They are BUTT-UGLY. I honestly do not think that a designer could have made a more ugly rear end on a car!!! The designer for the rear of this car SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP. And this design needs to go bye-bye and a new design implemented. The F'N rear looks like a baboons rearend sticking up in the air!! DAMN YOU FORD!!!
@SargentBlah you do realize that the 2005-present mustangs are retro-stylized right? which means they are modern muscle cars designed to look like the original mustangs from the 60s. So if you are such an alleged "Mustang fan to the max" then you would know that the rear end of the S197 mustangs are almost IDENTICAL to the original and classic mustangs that you apparently "love". Clearly you have no place commenting on this video because you are not a mustang fan at all. Go drive your chevy fag.
@drmkllr7 What a dip you are. So just because I find this particullar design an eye-sore, that makes my a Chevy guy? LOL, thats the most ignorant comment ever. I have owned Mustangs my whole live and would NEVER drive anything else so you dont have a CLUE. I love EVERYTHING about the 2005+ mustangs other than the rear which is F'N UGLIER THAN AZZ. Uglier than a BABOONS AZZ. The New Edge 99-04 Mustang GT's were the BEST LOOKING mustangs ever. And who cares if the look is retro? ITS UGLY.
@drmkllr7 What are you blind?? Hiding under a ROCK, LOL?? You seem to have MISSED every Mustang forum poll which showed the New Edge Mustang design CLEARLY, and by a HUGE margin beating out the FUGLY S197 models. Get out from under that rock and do some looking around other than being a FANBOY for the FUGLY S197. They are SUPER FUGLY in the rear ends and VERY few with say otherwise. Oh, except the FANBOYS like, um, like YOURSELF who are in denial. Looks like a baboons ass up in the air LOL.
@SargentBlah How am i living under a rock? Most people prefer the 2005- present mustangs wayyyy more than the sn-95s. And i wouldnt consider myself a fanboy considering i compete with my mustang
when the camera turn inside the car, suddenly the car has glass roof. However, when the camera turn outside view, the car doesn't has glass roof. This is what I call charm!
@khenry1991 you don't know what you are talking about. "no way civilians should be allowed on the flightline" wow.. they ARE allowed so long as the have a commander approval and an escort with a line badge.
@SkatePlanBProLite You're right it's based on the 4.6, but they changed a lot more than just the headers. That's like saying the 4.0L Cologne V6 that was in the 2010 V6 is the same as the 1.8L version they used back in the 70's. They've changed enough that they can call it "all new". Notice that a lot of car commercials will say "all new" whether it's true or not. That's because there have been substantial changes that led to that being said.
@SkatePlanBProLite the 5.0 is a completely new engine. THe 4.6 is the same one used in the fucking Crown Victoria for fucks sake. For ex. they delayed the new GT350 bc they didnt want to base the new shelby on the 4.6 bc it is fucking antique, they waited for the all-new 5.0, which is all-new and not related to the 4.6, which is antique while the 5.0 is all-new compared to the 4.6, which is antique and not all-new like the 5.0
Challengers may be faster, but Mustangs have way better handling. Plus they have a much sleeker body style, while the Camaro and Challenger tend to look kind of fat. Anyway why are we fighting? As long you go American Muscle, whether it be a Mustang, Camaro, or Challenger I'm all for it. Rather than some gay ass Beamer or Mercedes.
"392Drags" on youtube. The 392 Hemi runs faster than both the 2011 Camaro SS and the 2011. Mustang GT. The Hemi Challenger runs 12.44. Its a muscle car for grown-ups, not kids.
@SOFSoldier1 quit relying on youtube videos for your info.maybe when you are old enough to get a driver's liscence you will be able to get something other that a bicycle. you stupid litle boy
@SOFSoldier1 the fact that your profile says that you are 43 when you clearly are not, proves that you are a little kid......a litle kid who is not old enought to drive yet. LMAO. now go ride you skateboard young BOY
@SOFSoldier1 BECAUSE IT HAS MORE FUCKING POWER THAN THOSE CARS!!!!! the 392 is comparable to the GT500 and the upcoming ZL1, it should beat those cars listed BUT WILL GET MURDERED BY THE CARS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE COMPETITIVE WITH
Its funny how how are trying to argue how much better a Challenger 392 Hemi is than the mustang 5.0 because you fail to consider that the 5.0 is 14 thousand dollars cheaper than the Challenger! A 2011 GT500 is almost the same price as your Challenger and is in fact faster according to Inside Line. In case you want to know the GT500 beat your challenger by 2 tenths of a second 3.9 mph on the 1/4 mile! If you want to compare apples to apples the mustang is better! LOOK IT UP!
The 2011 Hemi Challenger 392 smokes both of these cars in every category, 1/4 mile 12.44, 470 HP (433 RWHP actually equals 508-527 Hp at the flywheel) and beats both in lateral/slalom. stopping, and 0-60.
@SOFSoldier1 i have a 2005 Cadillac CTS-V and i raced a brand new challenger the other day and romped his ass so bad it isn't funny. those cars arn't shit
@ELLDEE321 sure you did. Try a 2011 Challenger 392 Hemi and you will get your pimp-daddy ghetto mobile smoked like a cheap cigar. Now get off your Mom's computer.
@SOFSoldier1 I don't give a fuck if you believe it or not you goddamn cocksucking little bitch boy. now put your bitch ass mouth back on my cock, i'm getting ready to cum. you don't know a GODDAMN thing about cars. your dumbass statements prove that. now take your bitch ass to a video about sucking cock.....comment on that, it's something you actually know about. you stupid little bitch boy.
down vote for "top gear" tag.. Stay fair.
Joliie 1 day ago
long ad for such a short video....
xcislife94 2 weeks ago
Great review. Ad in the beginning sucked tho...
slyguyaction 2 weeks ago
these 5.0 is killin them bowtie boys lol
jessblaze1992 2 weeks ago
The 5.0 motor can be easily tuned to 450hp.
nismofury 2 weeks ago
Why do you show shots of the CS version when he's talking about and driving a baby blue GT?
Buttnut105 3 weeks ago
Tell me smoking tire, how do i get a job like this?
namybot 3 weeks ago 2
@namybot suck a lot balls
HawK271080 1 week ago
@HawK271080 Too much self-respect, I wouldn't even expose a testical.
namybot 1 week ago
I not saying the camaro is better but it would have had better chances if it was the SS camaro
Amputator12 1 month ago
Why the hell Ford didn't think about a 5.0 engine in the 05-10 Tangs until last year?
RichKilla86ers 1 month ago
@RichKilla86ers Suspense and profit.
lolpranksta 1 month ago
@RichKilla86ers No competition. Now there's the Camaro (and challenger if you wanna throw that in there) to compete against. Before that, there was nobody to raise the bar. Same goes for the GT500. They've used the same engine for a long time, now with the ZL1, the GT500 is finally getting an upgrade.
9992103 1 month ago
@RichKilla86ers Cuz the Camaro was literally kickin fords ass an was plain faster, was no way the 315hp was keepin up with the 428hp on the camaro, but outta ford mouths themselves i read in a in a 5.0 magazine they made that motor from scratch to directly compete with the Camaro
magnificent10304 2 weeks ago
@Mustang46liters cause Ford and Chevy have been competitors for years and some still choose to still hate on the other... Their both great cars but my opinion is the mustang looks better and it just better. handles better and is faster... and that has nothing to do with me being a Ford guy n oh yea I'm about to buy me one too
MrHighFlyer45 1 month ago
Why are Chevy owners such assholes the mustang and camaro are both great cars
Mustang46liters 1 month ago
I'm just guessing that the two cars were used because one is stick and the other is auto. Anyway, great review. Just wish it was longer cause this guy knows what he's talking about.
GrandTourer164 1 month ago
I may of just been converted...
theDENNISw22 1 month ago
Comment removed
theDENNISw22 1 month ago
My next car? Yes.
nexorabolis 1 month ago
im talking about the 2012 laguna seca version btw
chinchillawrangler 2 months ago
im surprised how no one has mentioned yet how fucking awesome ford is at building engines considering they made a 444hp n/a 5.0l v8.....chevy and dodge need 6.0+L's of displacement to do that
chinchillawrangler 2 months ago
@chinchillawrangler your retarded. hp/L means nothing. its all about hp/weight and size. there is a reason why chevy sells the most crate engines, engines are lightweight, reliable, easy to get more power out of, and compact. the 5.0 is a good engine, and weighs about 450lbs.
xXBurntBaconXx 1 month ago
@xXBurntBaconXx huh? wtf are u smokin? i was poiting out the fact that ford got 444 hp out of a 5.0 v8 while chevy and dodge need 6litres or more to do that....ur goin off on some random shit about weight. that had nothing to do with what i was talking about haha
chinchillawrangler 1 month ago
@chinchillawrangler im not smoking anything, HP/L means nothing unless your european (there insurance is based on engine size), what you want is an engine that is as light as possible, who cares if its 8L in displacement, as long as its light, and makes power.
xXBurntBaconXx 1 month ago
slowmaro got dummied
cheaniggachea 2 months ago
@SkylarkGSX thanks for Info bro.
yamenad 2 months ago
Something looks incredibly stupid about that Corvette @ 0:56 !! i can't figure it out.
yamenad 2 months ago
@yamenad headlights
IDontHateOnCars 1 month ago
@IDontHateOnCars Yeah! a big chance thats it :D
yamenad 1 month ago
been in 2 diff but pimped out Ford Mustang GT 5.0 ... honestly, I FREAKING LOVE IT!! (friends a millionaire and a mustang lover)
roxypurplebloom 2 months ago
@420cheebacheeba ots no a sunroof. Its a glass roof. You can see through it on the inside but on the outside it looks like a normal rood
5point093 2 months ago
I can not wait to own one of these cars. My favorite car of all times. Nothing like a Mustang GT!
toby197238 2 months ago
when he was driving up the hill with alot of turns the red mustang doesnt have a sun roof but in the face cam it does? xD
420cheebacheeba 2 months ago
Great review. That exhaust note was music to my ears.
BaronRogoff1 2 months ago
You should try the boss makes the gt look like a v6
1IImrxII1 2 months ago
@1IImrxII1
Really? No it doesn't.
daotien34 2 months ago
reaser
elcokeabias10 3 months ago
The 60's mustangs, foxbody 5.0's, and the 2011 GT are the best mustangs ever made...
punchmaster123 3 months ago
Royal purple oil - the oil that outperforms
vaporazor 4 months ago
That's a baddass car but I like the way the 2005s - 2009s look a lot more.
1AmericanUSA 4 months ago
you can tell they show a different mustang than the one he's actually driving. Seeing him drive there is a glass roof. Outside view of the red mustang there is no glass roof.
west2401 4 months ago
@west2401 i noticed that too
MalaFe 3 months ago
Should i trade in my AP2 S2000 for a New Mustang GT????????
theonlycoolnameleft 4 months ago
@theonlycoolnameleft no
supercarkid 4 months ago
Too bad Mustangs have high resale vaiue.
alexcheetah79 4 months ago
hey matt sorry to bother ya just was wondering if you could bring up the ford gt review video back thx ps- nice job with the reviews man
AVP5342 4 months ago
i really want a mustang but i need a garage first.
ZJP007 4 months ago 33
@ZJP007 yeah me too, just replace garage with money! lol
theDENNISw22 1 month ago
@ZJP007 i want a mustang gt, but im getting a camaro instead
goldmaster11 2 weeks ago
@goldmaster11 good man, good man.
JDYDesigns 2 days ago
@JDYDesigns yeah buddy
goldmaster11 2 days ago
Roses are red
Violets are pencil
This poem makes no sense
Toaster
mohiahmed1 4 months ago 54
best god damn car !!
josephzakka 4 months ago
@TheSmokingTire Check his username m8
TheRohBoat 5 months ago
OH MY GOD SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT YOUR GOD DAMN 392!!!!!!
AnonymoussourceL0L 5 months ago
Comment removed
ValorwithHonor 5 months ago
I want to know how it can be the return of something it didn't have in the first place this actually has a 5.0 under the hood the fox body just had the name because the 300 v6 was called known as the 4.9
DcEvoIX 5 months ago
his side burns .-.
joyride199 5 months ago
I didn't like the mustangs till i got my facts right:
Ford's 5.0 liter - 412 hp - 30k$ FASTEST
Chevy's 6.2 - 425 hp - 35k$ FASTER
Dodge's - 6.1- 420 hp- 42k$ FAST
I mean why would i pay more for a slower car that wastes more gas and handles worse?....
Looks are discussible but bang for buck is very apparently Mustang NO Matter what you say...
W4TCH4W 5 months ago
@W4TCH4W That is so true, i`m more of a camaro kinda guy but i can definately say that with the mustang you get more for your money, which is especially important nowadays cuz of the economy.
troyblexicanforever 4 months ago
I'm going to get my first car soon do you think this is worth being my first car lmao?
DHaJ40 6 months ago
@DHaJ40 Don't listen to people saying you gotta get a used car first you ain't worth it youll mess it up!!...
If you wanna save money in the long run get a new car... A mustang will be a very good start but if you can afford it go for it..
Although the V6 is better with insurance it is very popular as a teenage ( high school girl car. ) wanna feel badass get the v8 ( Forget that 6k difference well worth it...)
W4TCH4W 5 months ago
@W4TCH4W Yea I took the V8 for a test run the other day. It was like nothing I ever experienced before. Muscle cars are a different thing and I'm probably going to get the stang.
DHaJ40 5 months ago
@DHaJ40 Yea make sure you test drive other cars as well ( it's free :D ) like camaro and challenger they have different uhm.. personalities i should say... Maybe even a subaru wrx sti or mitsubishi evo who knows maybe you will like them better... Don't be biased like most of the guys here every country made good cars one year or another ( For example 1980's was a great year for german cars and 90's went super for japanese and 70's for americans ) just test drive and decide yourself...
W4TCH4W 5 months ago
@W4TCH4W I agree with you but I'm pretty firm on my decision. The stang it is....hopefully.
DHaJ40 5 months ago
Haha what are the odds, I live ON that road, I'll tell you though, it was a pain in the ass going to school every morning, but seeing the view definitely made it worth it. There are loads of sport cars and bikers going up and down all day. :D
Getting a 2008 model of this car soon.
Spendude92 6 months ago
Hey... he's not really driving the car from the helicopter view. Notice how there is a moon roof while he talks inside the cabin, and notice that the outside view does not have a moon roof lol
danman281 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 2 of 2" there's a whole series of customers complaining about crap clutchers/tranny's on the 2011/2012 GT
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
"392Drags" Youtube: 12.4 quarter 392 (stock, all four cars running in the 12.4s all night)
"Dragtimes. com" 12.38 392
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 Hey! Look who's not grounded from his computer any more :) Did your dad let you wash his Challenger SE? Even after you wrote "392" all over it with your favorite crayon?
331Grabber 6 months ago 3
How's those defective chinese clutches and shifters working for you fanboys?
Do a youtube search
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 I know the answer! Those Chinese clutches are working well enough to clock consistently better 1/4 mile times than an SRT-8.
Hey since you don't seem to like other countries making our performance parts: What does a Tremec TR-6060 and a piñata have in common? :)
331Grabber 6 months ago 4
Matt I'm thinking about getting either the new 5.0 Mustang or the new Impreza WRX STI sedan. What are you thoughts on both of these cars?
Thanks
katanamast279 6 months ago
@katanamast279 If you live anywhere where there's snow, get the STi. If you live in a place where it hardly snows at all, and all-weather control isn't a huge priority, get a Mustang. And prepare to spend lots of money on tires.
At least that's what I would do.
Shorty111R 6 months ago
@Shorty111R The mustang is perfectly fine in the snow. If you live in a major community plowed relatively well you would be fine even with the stock all seasons. Just use learn the car well enough.
In more rural areas - snow tires would be your friend.
JPIndustrie 6 months ago
@JPIndustrie LOL the mustang sucks in the snow. You must be joking.
13tomabram 5 months ago
challenger is the only car that looks like its first gen ancestor, the mustang , and the camaro, look nothing like the 1st gen
bismillahmashallah 6 months ago
where is this road?
desimunda116 6 months ago
The funnest thing about the 2011 Mustangs, which are GREAT cars. I went to my local dealership to test one out, and I'm in it feeling it out,take it on US-23 get it going then get back go to get out and I realize that the door handle is the same handle in my wifes 2004 Mercury Sable. The chrome handle, its just so odd.
DetroitMustang 6 months ago
I watch the car show BECAUSE this guy is on there
DetroitMustang 6 months ago
i hear these new mustangs have transmission issues....
errenthovsep 6 months ago
@errenthovsep were is the proof? hearing something isn't always the truth
6SpeedSilverado 6 months ago
@6SpeedSilverado ill send you a youtube message of a video link.
errenthovsep 6 months ago
Notice: The red car they show on the road is different from the one the guy is driving...it has glass roof
dirtyharree 6 months ago
"Dragtimes. com" : 392 runs 12.3, stock
"392 Hemi Challenger vs 350Z" 12.4, stock
"392Drags" 12.44 stock
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1
I don't know where you got these numbers from, but I assure you that NONE of them are stock form.
Motor Trend and other reputable car magazines test this car, and got 13's flat in the 1/4 mile.
I would believe them before I would believe this other website.
macaddict3032 6 months ago
This guys side burns annoy me
DaKiiDx1 6 months ago
Wheres the 5.0 on the side?
bobwinsthelottery 6 months ago
@SOFsoldier1. You know the out of the 15 cars in my grandpa's yard that needs a new transmission 6 are dodge's and 5 are newer than 1999. So you drive your POS dodge. 0 and there are 2 fords and they are each 15 years old.
FirstOnRaceDay004 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@331Grabber Has FORD fixed its defective transmissions/shifters/and clutches in the 2011-2012 Mustang GTs yet? tech bulletin under-way and recall in the works
See "2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 1 of 2"
See "2011 mustang defective tranny"
See "2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 2 of 2"
See "2011 Mustang GT - Shifter/Gear Whine"
See "Problematic Getrag MT-82 Transmission 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0L"
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
Comment removed
Double0SixShooter 6 months ago
I'm pretty much convinced SofSoldiers dad owns a Challenger and he is 15. As soon as he get's out of his special ed class he throws off his Styrofoam helmet and runs in his special shoes, to a computer with huge buttons and spreads the word of Dodge as he eats handfuls sugar from a bag hidden in his room. He then mentally adds a 6.4 liter to his dads six cylinder Challenger and proceeds to assume the identity of his dad. His parents sit quietly in the other room hoping he is watching porn.
331Grabber 6 months ago 45
@331Grabber Have you fixed your defective clutch yet, Fanboy?
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 My clutch is a Centerforce and it's doing just fine. Have you found a way to fill a Challenger with enough helium to offset 600 LBS yet?
331Grabber 6 months ago 3
@331Grabber I'll have to agree. But I do believe while riding the short bus home he doesn't take off his helmet to lick the windows easier. I believe he keeps it on to make it a challenge and to impress the other retards
shadowranger16 2 months ago
foreward 1:30 to avoid the shit.
marky2112 6 months ago
Ford just recalled the F150/250 truck line, Mustang GT 2011/20012 is next for defective clutches/shifters.
SOFSoldier1 7 months ago
Sorry but the 392 challenger
FirstOnRaceDay004 7 months ago
The
FirstOnRaceDay004 7 months ago
The 2011/2012 Hemi 392 Challenger (470HP/470 Ft-lbs) owns both the 2011 Mustang GT and Camaro SS. See "392Drags" on youtube; runs 12.4 bone stock (as fast as BOSS302/GT500) fully loaded, on street tires.
SOFSoldier1 7 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 So how do you know the car in that video is bone stock? Also you know as well as I the Challenger doesn't own the Mustang in ANY category.
V6 vs. V6 = Challenger loses badly. ($20,000 range)
Mustang GT vs. Challenger R/T. = Challenger loses badly. ($30,000 range)
BOSS 302 vs. Challenger SRT-8. = Challenger loses badly. ($40,000 range)
In each of the above pairings the Mustang is the cheaper of the two and beats Challenger in every performance category. Are you 15? Seriously....
331Grabber 7 months ago 2
@331Grabber Has FORD fixed its defective transmissions/shifters/and clutches in the 2011-2012 Mustang GTs yet?
See "2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 1 of 2"
See "2011 mustang defective tranny"
See "2011 Mustang GT Grinding Gears 2 of 2"
See "2011 Mustang GT - Shifter/Gear Whine"
See "Problematic Getrag MT-82 Transmission 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0L"
SOFSoldier1 7 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 Way to avoid the subject. Don't worry recalls happen all the time. Dodge also has a history full of them. So I guess you focus on that instead of answering my questions? Again. What do you definitely know about the car in the video that you are touting as proof that the SRT-8 runs 12.44 @ 109? You keep using the "owned" term to compare them. "Owned" isn't the term for a car that runs about the same 1/4 mile time as its competitor. This is why I don't think you're an adult.
331Grabber 7 months ago
@331Grabber Thasts why they were there, junior. All four cars at Infineon were there for Dodge official rating and testing of the first production cars, jackass. Thats why the automatic is rated at 12.4 officially by Dodge on this baseline. Hows your recall for your defective shifters and clutches coming on the 2011 GT?
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 Wait! DODGE testing a DODGE car yielded it's best ever 1/4 mile time! With VHT and rollout at a drag strip with the official Dodge guys trying to make a good showing vs no VHT and rollout for the Motor Trend Mustang that did 12.6 - 12.8? You realize Motor Trend and the other real testers don't work for the car manufacturers right? Also since you like to troll race vids you understand how 1/4 mile trap speed works right? The GTs is higher because of a better power to weight ratio.
331Grabber 6 months ago 16
@331Grabber
Pay attention: at DRAGTIMES. com you can put in Make, model, and all "official" ETs.....with timeslips. The best for stock 392 is 12.3...you would know this site well if you actually ever drag raced. The "392Drags" video was taken on NOV 10, 2010 of Dodge doing thier official test and tune for Infineon, where each ran from 12.44-12.67, with the average 12.44.
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@331Grabber brilliant retort. Who gives a crap about trap speeds if you lose, and your ET is lower, junior?
Go to "DRAGTIMES. com" for oficial recorded "bests". Meanwhile-let me know how that FORD clutch recall and tech bulletin goes for you and your GT fanboys.
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 I'll explain again. Trap speed is affected by power to weight. The Challenger and GT clock close to the same trap speed. Meaning the 470 HP the SRT8 makes is just enough to match the GTs HP to weight ratio. Since they have the same power to weight ratio the car with more optimal gearing and traction should win. So the question is why doesn't the Challenger win? If it's so much better it wouldn't ever post slower times than the GT. But as you and I know so well it does ..... A lot.
331Grabber 6 months ago
@331Grabber really? The Challenger ETs (official 1/4 mi ratings) are higher because the 392 is putting out anywhwere from 422-432 RWHP stock-which means its actually putting out 508-532 Flywheel. (15-20% drivetrain loss)
"dragtimes. com" 12.37
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 Yes really. The BOSS 302 puts out around 480 at the flywheel. That's why it only makes 16 HP less at the wheels but weighs 700 LBS less. Like I said better power to weight ratio.
SRT8 4200 LBS with 432 RWHP = 9.7 LBS per HP.
Mustang GT 3600 LBS with 370 RWHP = 9.7 LBS per HP.
BOSS 302 3600 LBS with 416 RWHP = 8.65 LBS per HP.
331Grabber 6 months ago
Let me help you out then: "392 Challenger vs. 350Z" on YOUTUBE: 12.4 and likewise, go to "DRAGTIMES. com" to see the offical stock best of 12.3 if you need assistance, let us know,
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
@331Grabber but almost all car reveiwers lied about the camaro ss automatic tranny 0-60 times where they calimed that its faster than the manual and acheived 60 in 4.6s but in reality it took around 5.3
legendaryspartan92 6 months ago
@legendaryspartan92 The auto reviewers also have different rules between them. Like Car and Driver leaves the traction control on during tests. I believe Motor Trend and Road & Track turn it off. I don't remember seeing the auto Camaro run 0-60 faster then the manual. But I admit haven't been paying attention to the auto trans cars. I know it is at a big 26 HP and around 90 LB disadvantage against the 6-Speed Camaro.
331Grabber 6 months ago
@331Grabber Yeah but the problem is that they all claimed the same exact time and they did so immediatly after GM claimed that time and thats why I'm suspisious.
legendaryspartan92 6 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 damn i am so sick of seeing this troll on every Mustang video. The 392 is ridiculously expensive and slower than the Boss 302, the GT500 and the GT350. A few mods to a 5.0 and you're whooping up on a car 15k more expensive no problem. Quit your trolling, no one cares about 392 drags, I'd like to see the big heavy turd take the turn at the end of the track and flip. Or blow out it's shitty independent rear axle the first time you do a burnout.
cammed05gto 6 months ago
@cammed05gto wrong. Go to "DRAGTIMES. com" or "392Drags"
SOFSoldier1 6 months ago
why does a mustang (unlike other V8's) make a typical bubbeling sound at idle and low rpm when engine rpm is decreasing? best car from america btw, they should sell it in Europe in big numbers!
robbedoes1985 7 months ago
I am a hardcore Mustang fan to the max, and always will be, but I just gotta ask Ford: WHY DID YOUR DESIGNERS DESIGN THE REAR END OF THE 2005-present MUSTANGS SO F'N UGLY?????? They are BUTT-UGLY. I honestly do not think that a designer could have made a more ugly rear end on a car!!! The designer for the rear of this car SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP. And this design needs to go bye-bye and a new design implemented. The F'N rear looks like a baboons rearend sticking up in the air!! DAMN YOU FORD!!!
SargentBlah 7 months ago
@SargentBlah you do realize that the 2005-present mustangs are retro-stylized right? which means they are modern muscle cars designed to look like the original mustangs from the 60s. So if you are such an alleged "Mustang fan to the max" then you would know that the rear end of the S197 mustangs are almost IDENTICAL to the original and classic mustangs that you apparently "love". Clearly you have no place commenting on this video because you are not a mustang fan at all. Go drive your chevy fag.
drmkllr7 7 months ago
@drmkllr7 What a dip you are. So just because I find this particullar design an eye-sore, that makes my a Chevy guy? LOL, thats the most ignorant comment ever. I have owned Mustangs my whole live and would NEVER drive anything else so you dont have a CLUE. I love EVERYTHING about the 2005+ mustangs other than the rear which is F'N UGLIER THAN AZZ. Uglier than a BABOONS AZZ. The New Edge 99-04 Mustang GT's were the BEST LOOKING mustangs ever. And who cares if the look is retro? ITS UGLY.
SargentBlah 6 months ago
@SargentBlah if you think the S-95 is the best looking Mustang ever than you are clearly alone on that one
drmkllr7 6 months ago
@drmkllr7 What are you blind?? Hiding under a ROCK, LOL?? You seem to have MISSED every Mustang forum poll which showed the New Edge Mustang design CLEARLY, and by a HUGE margin beating out the FUGLY S197 models. Get out from under that rock and do some looking around other than being a FANBOY for the FUGLY S197. They are SUPER FUGLY in the rear ends and VERY few with say otherwise. Oh, except the FANBOYS like, um, like YOURSELF who are in denial. Looks like a baboons ass up in the air LOL.
SargentBlah 6 months ago
@SargentBlah How am i living under a rock? Most people prefer the 2005- present mustangs wayyyy more than the sn-95s. And i wouldnt consider myself a fanboy considering i compete with my mustang
drmkllr7 6 months ago
when the camera turn inside the car, suddenly the car has glass roof. However, when the camera turn outside view, the car doesn't has glass roof. This is what I call charm!
KingQTR 7 months ago
@KingQTR Wanna see my penis?
zapatos123123 7 months ago
Its noise, its style, its power, I wish I'll get the cash to buy this car.
raxater 7 months ago
I <3 the snake
guitarguy788 7 months ago
0:10 dents the hood, easy there big guy
maclomacneil 7 months ago
Comment removed
maclomacneil 7 months ago
Comment removed
maclomacneil 7 months ago
Comment removed
maclomacneil 7 months ago
Comment removed
maclomacneil 7 months ago
He is a Mustang guy thats why his bald head looks like a Mustang ass
Gunbali 7 months ago
Wow way to put a commercial in it
HowzDemNutz 7 months ago
buy one with all the trimmings. I did. No regrets. Last muscle car was a 68 dodge charger. Miss her, but this mustang really kicks ass.
kkarnet 7 months ago
how are the top comments saying the same thing, and having the same author? wow!
alabalabanana 7 months ago 2
even if im a die hard chevy fan i would pick this over a camaro any day
verej1 7 months ago
Air Force FTW!!!!!
im a C-130 crewchief, and if im not mistaken, thats the C-130A
btw, how the piss did they get on the flightline?!?! im at Sheppard AFB and there is no way civillians should be allowed in the flightline
khenry1991 7 months ago
@khenry1991 you don't know what you are talking about. "no way civilians should be allowed on the flightline" wow.. they ARE allowed so long as the have a commander approval and an escort with a line badge.
schmeltz 7 months ago
3600lb is NOT light for ANY car.
LabRat4680 7 months ago
@LabRat4680 It's light for a '70s wood-paneled oceanliner!
NESherv 7 months ago
Comment removed
9Skateboard7 7 months ago
its not 5 liter , its a 4.6 liter engine with 5/0 headers
SkatePlanBProLite 8 months ago
@SkatePlanBProLite You're right it's based on the 4.6, but they changed a lot more than just the headers. That's like saying the 4.0L Cologne V6 that was in the 2010 V6 is the same as the 1.8L version they used back in the 70's. They've changed enough that they can call it "all new". Notice that a lot of car commercials will say "all new" whether it's true or not. That's because there have been substantial changes that led to that being said.
ItsJustBrenton 7 months ago
@SkatePlanBProLite Headers don't change the displacement.
mcesarey 7 months ago
@SkatePlanBProLite 4951cc = 4.951 L or pretty damned close to 5.0.
LabRat4680 7 months ago
@SkatePlanBProLite lol yeah it is fuckface...if you knew anything you would know the 5.0 is legendary.
xFReSHeReST 7 months ago
@SkatePlanBProLite the 5.0 is a completely new engine. THe 4.6 is the same one used in the fucking Crown Victoria for fucks sake. For ex. they delayed the new GT350 bc they didnt want to base the new shelby on the 4.6 bc it is fucking antique, they waited for the all-new 5.0, which is all-new and not related to the 4.6, which is antique while the 5.0 is all-new compared to the 4.6, which is antique and not all-new like the 5.0
stormthorgerson 5 months ago
what's the name of the theme song
waleedahm 8 months ago
I love camaros but I have to say this mustang has my attention. Looks like a good car from what I've heard. I would really like to have one.
uri112189 8 months ago
I got a fuckin honda that will smoke that shit all the way down put 500 and my honda on it you beat me ill give you my honda
kentayful 8 months ago
Challengers may be faster, but Mustangs have way better handling. Plus they have a much sleeker body style, while the Camaro and Challenger tend to look kind of fat. Anyway why are we fighting? As long you go American Muscle, whether it be a Mustang, Camaro, or Challenger I'm all for it. Rather than some gay ass Beamer or Mercedes.
chad851000 8 months ago
@chad851000 Good point, well said
SOFSoldier1 8 months ago
"392Drags" on youtube. The 392 Hemi runs faster than both the 2011 Camaro SS and the 2011. Mustang GT. The Hemi Challenger runs 12.44. Its a muscle car for grown-ups, not kids.
SOFSoldier1 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 So compare it with its rivals, the GT500/Boss 302 and the ZL1.
PantstofryPWNZ 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 no one gives a shit about a piece of shit dodge
ELLDEE321 8 months ago
@ELLDEE321 you fanboys get owned by the Hemi's 470 HP, 470 ft lbs of torque, and 12.44 ets...LMFAO.
SOFSoldier1 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 quit relying on youtube videos for your info.maybe when you are old enough to get a driver's liscence you will be able to get something other that a bicycle. you stupid litle boy
ELLDEE321 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 the fact that your profile says that you are 43 when you clearly are not, proves that you are a little kid......a litle kid who is not old enought to drive yet. LMAO. now go ride you skateboard young BOY
ELLDEE321 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 BECAUSE IT HAS MORE FUCKING POWER THAN THOSE CARS!!!!! the 392 is comparable to the GT500 and the upcoming ZL1, it should beat those cars listed BUT WILL GET MURDERED BY THE CARS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE COMPETITIVE WITH
stormthorgerson 5 months ago
ha ha the top comments are duplicates lol. That's too funny ;)
IrishChris1979 8 months ago
Type in "392Drags" on Youtube, with no space. If you would like to see the new Mustang GT and Camaro SS killer from Mopar.
SOFSoldier1 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1
Its funny how how are trying to argue how much better a Challenger 392 Hemi is than the mustang 5.0 because you fail to consider that the 5.0 is 14 thousand dollars cheaper than the Challenger! A 2011 GT500 is almost the same price as your Challenger and is in fact faster according to Inside Line. In case you want to know the GT500 beat your challenger by 2 tenths of a second 3.9 mph on the 1/4 mile! If you want to compare apples to apples the mustang is better! LOOK IT UP!
sunsett97 7 months ago
@sunsett97 hell yeh bra the mustang is way better than the dodge challenger and the camaro my opinion
mustang305sfinest 7 months ago
Voll die Verarsche xD
Im innenraum hat er n Fenster aufm Dach, und wenn man den MUstang von außen betrachtet hat er es nicht.. komisch oder? xDDDDD
1992Hoppe 8 months ago
The 2011 Hemi Challenger 392 smokes both of these cars in every category, 1/4 mile 12.44, 470 HP (433 RWHP actually equals 508-527 Hp at the flywheel) and beats both in lateral/slalom. stopping, and 0-60.
SOFSoldier1 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 i have a 2005 Cadillac CTS-V and i raced a brand new challenger the other day and romped his ass so bad it isn't funny. those cars arn't shit
ELLDEE321 8 months ago
@ELLDEE321 sure you did. Try a 2011 Challenger 392 Hemi and you will get your pimp-daddy ghetto mobile smoked like a cheap cigar. Now get off your Mom's computer.
SOFSoldier1 8 months ago
@SOFSoldier1 I don't give a fuck if you believe it or not you goddamn cocksucking little bitch boy. now put your bitch ass mouth back on my cock, i'm getting ready to cum. you don't know a GODDAMN thing about cars. your dumbass statements prove that. now take your bitch ass to a video about sucking cock.....comment on that, it's something you actually know about. you stupid little bitch boy.
ELLDEE321 8 months ago