Added: 5 years ago
From: jbruce101
Views: 46,818
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • And the winner is the camera!! xD

  • Over all. Which is the better car?

  • Sure the srt4 is fast but they are ugly cars and with a stage 3 supercharger kit from ripmods the eclipse will rape

  • If you give the gt RIPP's Super Charger, it will kill both of these cars in a flash.

  • Kind of shocking to see the Eclipse beat the TT, I was expecting a different outcome there.

  • ok just to clarify for everyone here. dodge and mitsu have been in bed together since the 80's. dodge colt had mitsu 1.6, dodge stratus (01-on) had mitsu 2,4 also known as the 4g64. same as the galant. the r/t also had mitsu 3.0 also put in the 300gt of earlier years. the neon had at least two car lengths on the eclipse and more on the somehow slow audi tt. way to go u can win with a handicap. srt-4 is still a neon. and the eclipse will never be as good as the gsx. NEVER EVER.

  • @djpauldc isn't the 2006 eclipse gt better than the..wait, which gsx are you talking about?

  • If a cop clocks you at over 100 do you just get a really costly ticket or does your car get impounded and you go to jail? I've been told so many different things and really want to know.

  • @ear12861

    After 25MPH over the speed limit they can take your license on the spot. Well it's not going to be hey give me that license... But they will take you jail and they can take it from you for a year.

  • what mods did the srt4 have??

  • Going from memory he had 3" turbo back w/O2 housing, Mopar intake, Mopar STG 1 ECU, an aftemarket fuel rail, fuel return line, rising rate FPR, bigger throtle body, Upgraded I/C and piping (not sure what kind), and tuned with an APexi SAFC-2. So really not to much done, he was a bit over 300WHP. I can't remember how much though.

  • Cool Man Thnaks!!!

  • lol audi's are so fucking overpriced... an A4 in canada is like 55gs after taxes and shit... the eclipse will run you like 38k and its faster...

    now take an audi tt which is like 70gs after taxes... and wow audi is overpriced!!!!!!!!

  • Acctually, the Eclipse is classified as an aperican car now... being as of 2006, they are manufactured in the us...There is a Mitusbishi manufacture in Normal Illinois.

  • Hey, how u know that?

    I live close to Bloomington, I got down there like 3 days a week. Where u from

  • I talked to the sales person at the dealership. I from GA.. Plus the sticker on my rear window says Normal Illinois

  • All the DSM models where made in Normal, IL. They all share the same DSM key if you own a DSM product. I am not sure about the 3rd gen. I know for a face the 2nd is. I have one.

  • That Eclipse is the GT V6. When that video was taken the car only had an axel back exhaust installed, so it was pretty much stock.

  • @jbruce101

    so the TT was stock?

  • jum this is a interesting video wode like to know what engine the eclipse haves cose if its the 4cly its quite impresive and if its the 6 it runs good people just keep forgething what a big and heavy car that eclipse is its way heavier then that tt and the neon + the neon is turbo and they run good but im quite inerested in that eclipse if u have any info on it pleas let me know im a tuner i dont messure a car by evety thing hp torque weigth transm. so i like to experiment nice vid good job

  • I had a 2004 srt that I traded in for a 2006 eclipse gt 6sp. The srts bone-stock are definetly quicker and handle better,(that's not just my opinion, but a known fact) but I like my mitsu better.

    P.S. ibanez, the srts are made in Mexico, and the 4G eclipses are made in Illinois

  • Respect American Muscle, Japanese Tecnology and European Engineering.

  • i can respect japanese Technology and Euro engineering but .. not american crap

  • Amen!

  • y cuz that american crap destoryed both that tt and gt

  • The american crap didn't destroy anything.. He had 2 cars length head start and the eclipse GT wasn't racing the queer with the camera... Sooo, how do you figure?

  • @Cloudstrife1188

    Well if you listen you can hear the SRT4 not climbing RPM's until the Eclipse was almost beside him. The Eclipse still got pulled on for more than 4 car lengths so it doesn't matter if if he had those 2 car lengths that your talking about.

  • @scoobyfan2009 Your talking about the moddified STR4? The one that runs 13s Vs a stock GT with low high 13s? Oh, damn i didnt see that. Throw in an intake, and some headers to that GT and it will SMOKE the STR4. I mean, we are talking simple mods right? I just gave you rwo that will bolt on 60WHP.

  • @Cloudstrife1188

    This is a completely diffrent case man. QM times and highway pulls are completely different. The SRT shines top end. Thats why the 4 cylinder is killing the V6 on top end. Lol sure in the QM it would but on a highway pull it wouldn't.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 yeah this is true, but even with these, idk what that particular srt4 was running, but I roll with some guys that run about 400whp in srt4s and cobalts SS's, and theyll probably still leave me when I get my headers and retune... just saying. I LOVE my car, and my top end is close to a stock cobalt SS, but its a FAT car, so even with ~300 wheel (bolt ons+good tune) these guys will leave me all day, with 800 lbs less, and another 100hp. so don't go all crazy on them

  • srt4 has mits engine in it all cars r made over sees neways

  • how does it have a mitsubishi engine in it? you really dont know your shit do you?

  • Comment removed

  • so wheres this mitsubishi engine your talking about dipshit

  • The neon isnt really American Muscle sorry

  • That NEON SRT4 is far from american muscle! LOL

  • mopar muscle magazine accepted it as a modern muscle because of its high torque and power throughout the whole power band

  • The turbocharger was a reverse rotation Mitsubishi TD04LR-16Gk with a 6 cm² (0.93 sq in) turbine inlet.

    The exhaust manifold and turbine housing were cast in one piece by Mitsubishi from high-nickel Ni-Resist steel

  • a turbo isnt a motor. you said it has a mitsu engine in it. the only part thats not american on it was only the turbo and MOST srt owners have gotten rid of that tiny turbo

  • daimler chrysler is closely related to mits.. kinda like mercury to ford or mazda...

  • so , they had a parnership with a few engines. but your still not proving your point on how the srt engine is mitsubishi. hardly any chrysler cars had mitsu engines. so prove that its a mitsu engine

  • dude you are tweaking out.. srt s are nasttty and i have much respect for them.. i heard from a reliable source that mits helped in the designing.. maybe he is wrong and i heard.. wrong.. sorry if this is absorbing your time..

  • the srt-4 was a chrysler stratus block with all dodge exept for the turbo, your sorce was problably talking about the caliber srt engine which is chrysler/mitsu/hundai but there both nice engines. but id love to have that 6spd the caliber srt got

  • Comment removed

  • nope stratus has a 2.4 (all chrysler) 2.7 v6 (all chrysler) and 3.0 v6 that only comes in the stratus R/T and thats the mitsubishi engine and its loaded with problems. and the 2.4 was out way back in 95 when the first gen stratus was out way before the pt cruiser. the 2.4 in the srt-4 was a stratus block and everyting else was custom from chrysler for the car, then they made a weaker version of the engine for the pt-gt

  • @Ganbala ur right haha i thaught i was the only person who thaught that but the srt4 is not muscle its a neon

  • @VTEC4LYFEGunny

    Other than Saturn Dodge would probably be the closest American car to being Japanese. Saturn is one of the better made American cars. Too bad they aren't going to be made ne more. For the longest time the SRT4's were the fastest car you could buy for under 20grand new.

  • I don't mind the new lancers EVO's, nice lines decent power and beutiful interiors. I think thats the only mitsu I could buy now, unless I wanted a good ol 3000 GT :P there still up there in my faves.

  • i no wat u mean bruce! omg i hate all those dumb fuks who think if u put a pipe (fart can lol) on ur honda or scion, its fast! ITS NOT FAST!

  • LOL! All those fags do is make there car look like a joke, and it brings down the guys who are actually serious about performance.

  • lol I used to own an srt-4 as a matter of fact.... till my divorce..... but for now i'll drive my lonely chev pick me up truck. Never done me wrong. Not bashing eclipse's any ways.... really just saying they are way over bought up here man... there every where..... and i'm not lying....

  • Yeah I know what you mean, I liked them for a long time till the fast and the furious came out. Then I took an Eclipse hiatus because of all the ricer fags with GS's equipped with fart cans. But there aren't to many around VA and the 4th gen rekindled my love affair (I/H/E made low 13's on the car in the video). But I feel your pain, I'm driving a Ranger till I finish my divorce.

  • hahaha, GS equipped with fart cans. hahahaha. so true. A lot of these cars are all show, no go. Puttin an exhaust does NOT make ur car go faster. Go do the research and do it right... don't do half ass mods just for sound or looks.

  • technically putting on a new less restrictive exhaust system will make your car go faster because you are freeing up horsepower blocked by your stock exhaust lol, but I will agree I hate little ricers with their fartcans

  • if the "muffler" is too free flowing it causes back pressure and you lose torque, only a high flow muffler designed for maximum flow while reducing back pressure will really give you some more power.

  • omg zfaNEK--THANK YOU!!! finally some else says that---i'm so tired of jackasseds who put huge spoilers and exhaust systems on little honda civic and think they have power.

  • eclipse's were cool....... till I moved to fort mac and every tom dick and hairy including there dogs had one. sorry, dem cars for the girls :)

  • Oh yeah, and what do you drive.

  • I got a 06 eclipse gt v6 and that sucker is fast i can take any stock mustang gt of the line ,if you dont have turbo or nos your dead in the water ,,and all i have is bolt on intake i got 280hp at the wheels wait till i get the turbo lol

  • Maybe at the crank but not the wheels, you cant gain 60WHP from an intake.

  • the eclipse looks beautiful

  • looks like the srt wins!

  • the beast SRT4 jajaja

  • thats not even an eclipse gt

  • Wow guy just kill yourself. Theres no way any GS would even keep up with a TT, let alone beat one.

  • an AEB 1.8t puts down about 180 at the crank.... then you look at power loss thanks to awd.... tehre for the Mitsu pwns... and this is coming from a dubber

  • acually the eclipse weight's a shit load more than a 91 caddy deville no bullshit

  • eclipses are fast, srt-4 FTW !!

  • damn the tt got owned

  • i have a e-06gt and i won against one audi tt like that but a cirrus and a neon srt4 won me and i really know how to drive my car that audi is really slow i dont regret buying that car because is much more beautiful than an "neon" and i get more girls jejeje

    viva mexico

  • Yeah you definetly get more bitches in an Eclipse than a Neon. But yeah if you lost to a Cirrus than you need to work on your driving a bit.

  • *USA

  • karlamann, if the cars are boring to you then why did you watch it?

  • video taken on interstate 295...passing the hopewell/chester exit about to cross over the appomattox river bridge...lol

  • Yup

  • CALM DOWN MAPQUEST..LOL

  • lol....actually....I have family that live off that exit and drive down 295 often...

  • lol that was just a pussy race with two boring cars(automatik suspension,too?^^ lol) take a ride on a german autobahn, some people drive 240km/h or more and nobody there calls it a race or spectacular just all day routine on a autobahn^^

    cheers

  • Respect American Muscle, Japanese Efficiency, and European Engineering.

  • what upgrades do the eclipse and audi have

  • At the time the Eclipse had an axel back exhaust. The audi had CAI, turbo back exhaust, and was running 22PSI with supporting mods. Can't tell ya much else, sorry.

  • neons are for

    a. ppl who are broke cuz its a cheap car

    b. ppl who have bad taste in cars

    c. or for dumbass mudafuckas

  • "THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING EVER!!! BUT I LOVE MY MOM AND DON'T WANT TO TAKE ANY CHANCES!

    If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours"

  • i respect the power/TURBO and what the SRT can do, but its a NEON! I dont care if it had a ferrari engine i still dont like it

  • fuck all that number shit its on video. lol thats why i love neons couldnt atleast pass the camera car. thats sick

  • lol you guys crack me up. That Audi was either 180hp or guy didn't know how to drive it and if any owner of stock 6cyl eclipse thinks that he can hang with SRT4...you're dreaming.

  • Uhh that Eclipse runs a 14.2@101MPH. It also has 30 more horse than a stock SRT4 and 40 more than a 225hp TT. If your gonna talk shit than at least know what your talking about dumb-ass.

  • ...cntd... SO my comment stands...that TT is either 180, or the driver didn't know how to drive it (assuming it was running right). ...and as I said, there is no way in hell stock E-GT or TT will keep up with an SRT4.

  • See that just shows me what an idiot you really are. I didn't try to offend you in any way, but you went and opened up your rotten mouth at me. HP is not everything and you'll learn it sooner or later. Stock 263hp E-GT runs mid 14s in the quarter. If "that" car ran 14.2, it still wouldn't mean that its faster than a stock 225 since I ran mine in low 14s when it was stock (TT is 200lbs lighter FYI).

  • Actually yes thats a 225hp TT, and a modded one at that. And yes the guy can drive, same with the guy in the SRT-4. That Eclipse runs a 14.2 @102, whats your TT's trap speed? You see the only reason that TT's are quick is because of the quattro, considering this race was from a 50 roll its no wonder that I smoked him. And stock SRT4's aren't that quick, I can take them from a roll or a dig. Don't talk crap about something you know nothing about, especially when all you drive is a glorrified GTI.

  • lol a glorified GTI is still better to me than latest eclipse. I loved the first and second generation, but this latest is just not my cup of tea. I think trap speed was a 98mph (can't remember exact number)

  • Whatever guy, thats a modded 225hp TT quattro running 20PSI and the driver can drive just fine. Oh and since you want to quote magazine numbers, a 225hp Quattro runs a 14.8 @95mph, much slower than my 14.2 @ 102MPH with me behind the wheel. I don't give a crap about your magazine numbers, they way you talk I wonder if your even old enough to get a license.

  • 225Q convertible runs 14.8, coupe runs mid-low 14s. A 225 coupe with exhaust and chip runs 13.5, assuming that you're willing to abuse the clutch. I've owned this car long enough to know that you really must know it well to keep it running at top level. With just a minor leak/maf problem it will easily move from 13.5 to 14.5. Your friend should get his checked out if you beat him that badly with a chip. That should not occur.

  • 14.8 is for a 225 convertible, coupe runs mid-low 14s. Guys with just a chip and exhaust ran 13.5 (check audiwold's forum if you like). I've had this car long enough to know that a little problem can greatly effect it's performance. Just a small leak or MAF/temp issue can move it from 13.5 to 14.5, you really have to know the car well to keep it running at top shape. If your friend has a chip, he shouldn't have lost to you at all, let alone by that margin.

  • It is also from a roll, no Quattro advantage. And I will admit that he can beat me from a dig but only by a couple lengths and when he doesn't burn up his clutch. But hey if you don't believe me and would like to try it I'd be more than happy to run ya if your local.

  • I'm in Toronto so if you're ever driving by we could give it a shot. It wouldn't be fair though because my car is far from stock. I'd run that SRT4 though ;-)

  • Preach it brother preach it

  • listen up dumb ass first of all they dont make 95-99 eclipse gt's thats from 2000 up. and the srt-4 is modded idiot. Secondly what does it matter what size engine is in the car if puts down good hp. Stock for stock it rapes the srt-4 and if they made it rwd. it would've inluded a drive shaft which would've resulted in loss of hp. The only thing remotly wrong with the new eclipse gt is traction prob. which can be overcome with a good driver so there it is.

  • wow, u dont know anything do you...they had the pre 99, eclipse, gt's gts-t's and gsx's...lol do some research..

  • no idiot gt's are 2000 nd up before that was the rs, gs, gst, gsx. there it is....

  • He's right, GT's didn't exist till 2000. And fast GT's didn't exist till 2006, haha.

  • i just keep rambling, but they only allow a certain amount of characters.

    Second, don't hate on Hondas. Haha I used to until my boyfriend supercharged his SI and that thing is a monster. =] So yes, in general Hondas suck. Especially all the ricer kids with the aluminum wings and the primer bodykits, but I have definetly changed my mind about them.

    Third, nice kill. =) Aftermarket turbo on the TT or no? Just curious. I hate them anyway.. lol

  • you do know that supercharging a b16 is pretty pointless and he would have made alot better numbers with a turbo?

  • yeah, but every civic in the United States is turboed. it's different. anyone can pick up a turbo for $300. it turns alot of heads.

  • YouTube wouldn't let me post it all together! lol

    By the way, have you ever DRIVEN an 06 Eclipse? Until you do, shut your mouth. EVERYONE I bring in my car is definetly suprised. It's quick.

  • Exactly. Most people don't have a CLUE what the 2006+ eclipse 6-spd GT can do. It's heavy, but no slouch. Either drive it, or take note that people have run the GT @ 13.9 or 14.0 BONE STOCK on those garbage eagle RS-A tires. Oh and 0-60 in 5.6 or less, quite easily (6-spd GT only).

  • the eclipse is light as a turd i would know i have one

  • I smoke SRT-4's all day long. That's ridiculous. The new Eclipses are not crap at all. Yes, the 95-99 model is definetly a good look, but they improved the Eclipse from the last model for sure. It would be nice if it was RWD, but they don't get any traction when you bang gears as it is. How would it be with RWD? You can have your opinion, but I would LOVE to know that you drive.

  • I like the old 95-99 Eclipse GT's, but the newer ones suck ass.. freaking V6 front wheel drive pieces of crap, they need to make them RWD if they're going with a V6 engine.. what kind of supposed "sports car" is FF, that's my only bone with Mitsubishi. Either make it V6 RWD, or smaller lighter FF with the Evolution L4 Turbo engine, as you can see the Dodge SRT4 2.5L (with a Mitsubishi)Turbo smoked that shit.

  • And what do you drive? Exactly, shut your mouth.

  • I gaurentee that SRT-4 is built. Ive smoked 2 SRT-4's with my Eclipse GT. And wtf do you know about the Eclipse being a good car? You probably drive a honda. nuff said

  • Yeah that SRT4 is built, to the tune of over 300whp.

  • yeah dude, im pretty sure there doing away with the eclipse by 2010 or before. sad, considering there kickass vehicles but who knows what they will replace it with :).

  • sweeet, eclipse handed that over-priced audi its ass! to bad there discontinuing the eclipse damnit :(.

  • Where did ya hear that, there not discontinuing the Eclipse are they. Oh well, I got mine :).

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more