Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
That's actually a foul.
zuluman15 9 months ago
Pause at 0:10... It's an obvious reach.
RAPInstrumentals01 1 year ago
The Refs in the NBA suck and call fucking phantom fouls all the time. They favor certain teams and players. Trust me Kobe isnt one of them. The guy had 0 FTs last night... Durant on the other hand...
lakerforlife1982 1 year ago
Under what rule does losing the ball stop a foul from being a foul?
bradfordcwilkins 1 year ago
Shouldn't have been a foul. Bad call. Good video.
ultimatederon 2 years ago
So you're saying that if a player loses control of the ball then it is ok for a defender to hit him? Thats a foul buddy everytime.
chitownref 2 years ago
lol thats an obvious reach. good clip wrong title
mbooker23 2 years ago
reach
vamichaelj2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Cover your mouth with you hand
2. Make a wish
3.Close your hand (fist)
4. Hold you hand at heart for 5 seconds
5. Send this to 3 more videos
6. Tommorrow will be the best day ever
it actually worked
patryk1250 2 years ago
it would be a reaching foul if he hit him while he had the ball. But AK went to knock the ball out and Kobe tried to do a behind the back pass to no one. so that nullifies any foul that would be called. Kobe lost posession.
Lacarious 2 years ago
LOL. AK-47 got no ball and all jersey.
jsbs84 2 years ago 2
dude thats a reaching foul
yadidimean7777 2 years ago