where are the nocturnus? are you taking the piss? its frickign block constructed you moron why are you even watching this if you probally dont know what block is
You know what I absolutely love about these comments? These have to be the most intelligent and well thought out sentences that I've ever seen on Youtube. I was kind of expecting to see, "fake and gay", or something like that.
It's nice to see somebody who doesn't look like they still live with there mom. Nice to have a representation of someone who's normal that plays magic. When people think of magic players, they tend to think of LARPers with wizard caps. Diggin the element hat too.
Vamps suck. It isn't even a deck. It is more like a deck that has a bunch of creatures with the same subtype. At least Allies, Elves, and Eldrazi can all be decks because they work off each other.
@SarkhanVol151 Yep, not even a deck- that's why it takes multiple spots in the Daily Events EVERY SINGLE TIME. It may not be the best deck for the meta, but to say "it isn't even a deck" is shear lunacy, and utter retardation. Do you even play Magic?
@ubernerd35 Yes, but obviously you didn't get what I was saying. But what I was trying to convey is that it shouldn't have it's own deck name etc. Like Elf decks can be Elf decks because they even have Tribal Spells that count as "Elf Cards" and elves work off other elves. Honestly how many Vampire cards work off each other? Like what 2 or 3? The same goes for Eldrazi. Hell even back when Treefolk creatures were around they still worked off eachother. Yes Vampires is a deck but it isn't unique.
@HazardFlame You honestly aren't seeing what I am saying. YES it is a physical deck. But it shouldn't be called a "Vampire deck" it should be called a Mono Black deck with Vampires. All the Mono Black decks using Vampires are just an assembly of creatures with the the same type. You are honestly too stupid to insult.
@SarkhanVol151 The Boros bushwhacker deck had nothing to do with Boros, it was just white red and fast, but it was a name that communicated the message quickly to those familiar with it. So Vampires is just the name for the deck in standard, whether you feel the definition is appropriate or not. Also, insulting people because you communicated your message badly is just plain pathetic.
@SarkhanVol151 No, you didn't, you phrased it poorly. In any case, language is functional, f you produce a sentence that is easily misunderstood then it is your fault for not working around that possibility.
@ihateirony Again what I said was fine and easily understandable. It is not my fault illiterate magic players can't read what I say. Sorry, I actually use my English.
@SarkhanVol151 Language is a functional social construction between people, it is not a static entity that any single person can have the authority on. As such, if you communicate a message and the majority of people misinterpret it then you made the mistake, you cannot claim that they were wrong and you weren't as what is right is determined by the majority when it comes to language. Hell, the way we learn language is through trial and error.It's how behavioural linguistics work.
@ihateirony Obviously you just gave a definition to language. And you gave an example that simply used the fact two people didn't understand what I said. When it is totally possible that the two people made the same mistake. But you again did not do what I said. I said you have yet to provide proof of your disingenuous assertions. You did NOT give an example from what I said to prove that you are right.
@SarkhanVol151 The point is that if the two people can make the same mistake then it is your fault for producing a sentence that can be easily misunderstood. People far greater than you or I have debated this years ago and my side came out on top. What do you need an example for, you said that it isn't a deck and you meant that it isn't a proper deck type and as such people interpreted you as a simpleton who thought it wasn't a physical deck. I don't see why you need an example when it's central
@ihateirony I can't see how it is my fault since it is their fault they can't read between the lines. I don't consider a deck to be just a specific amount of cards. My original statement mentioned nothing about it not being a physical deck. If I make a deck with 60 forest in it is it still a deck? All the forest can still represent Vampires, just an assembly of similar cards in a format that is used to meet legal standards. Oh wow I didn't go into in depth detail on how I think it isn't a deck.
@SarkhanVol151 It's your fault because you porduced the sentence in order to communicate the point and you failed to communicate it. If you're talking to a three year old and you tell them "a spank will be administered contingent on your behaviour" and they don't understand you it's your fault for not trying to work around limitations. You didn't need to go into depth, you just need have used different words, i.e. "it isn't a proper deck type" rather than "It isn't even a deck"
@SarkhanVol151 LSV said the same thing, I wonder where you got your opinion from? Eldrazi work off eachother? Vamps function togather more then eldrazi do....you fail.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Gerry is a douche. Wish he'd realize that Magic corrolates to things completely unrelated to "cool". As for deckbuilder, I can't say he's done anything that would make me think he's a great deckbuilder. Come on, Vengavine in Naya.... Even the weakest of Magic minds knew that that was an obvious place for Vengi....
@tonyadpx He's not a douche- it's just his sense of humor. He is actually one of the non-douchebaggiest pros competing in the upper levels of the game.
How came Vampire Nighthawk not be that great? It stops many great green fatties. I have a vampire deck that focuses around returning cards like these to my hand or deck.
"As long as they (Jund) doesn't put a lot of pressure on you..." Right, as long as Jund doesn't do exactly what its supposed to do....Good luck!
Nottybastard 2 months ago
oh ya malikir is just like an air elemental except you know like 3 other abilities with no drawbacks but ya I tooootally see his point >.>
FuckingFuckersFuck 5 months ago
@FuckingFuckersFuck ...
gothikgamer 4 months ago
Wow the way he wears that cap is fucking retarded :D
Lortagreb 7 months ago
"You have all the big spells in your hand, but... mmm sorry, Mind Sludge. You got nothing :( "
ElgartheWise 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so cheated mind sludge.....
IznoLTB 1 year ago
so cheated main sludge.....
IznoLTB 1 year ago
The host said 61 as if it was a big deal or a crime lol I usually always have 64....20 creatures, 20 spells and 24 mana.
whoshotya117 1 year ago
@whoshotya117 You really run that much mana? I'm running a 65 card vampire-discard deck and only run 15 swamps, 4 piranha marsh, and 2 bojuka bog.
xH00K4HxSN1P3Rx 1 year ago
@xH00K4HxSN1P3Rx Well 23-24 but yes I do. I have 23 in my vamp deck and its going great sometimes I'm getting little mana.
whoshotya117 1 year ago
@xH00K4HxSN1P3Rx i dont know why you would be running a 65 card deck, cut that down to 60 man there is always cuts
Loxodonta123 1 year ago
where are the nocturnus? are you taking the piss? its frickign block constructed you moron why are you even watching this if you probally dont know what block is
ipiercyx 1 year ago
where are the vampire nocturnuses!?
dalexj 1 year ago
@dalexj Its block constructed format meaning only cards from the zendikar block, (Zendikar, Rise of Eldrazi and Worldwake.) Nocturnus was in M10.
gameguru42392 1 year ago
listen how many times gerry thompson says like on the 7:42 until the end
XcontenteX 1 year ago
@XcontenteX There is over 3 I know that for sure
gardeeon 1 year ago
@XcontenteX 15 XD
tsuzuki1227 1 year ago
fckn hate vampires.
solidkingcobra 1 year ago
You know what I absolutely love about these comments? These have to be the most intelligent and well thought out sentences that I've ever seen on Youtube. I was kind of expecting to see, "fake and gay", or something like that.
FullDeck13 1 year ago 25
someone give me thier opinion on this:
4 nighthawk over 4 gatekeeper
TheTeamSBS 1 year ago
It is nice to see someone who looks normal and not overly nerdy.. havent seen a deck tech with someone like that since Brian Kibler did it
MrRCPresident 1 year ago
It's nice to see somebody who doesn't look like they still live with there mom. Nice to have a representation of someone who's normal that plays magic. When people think of magic players, they tend to think of LARPers with wizard caps. Diggin the element hat too.
FullDeck13 1 year ago
Vamps suck. It isn't even a deck. It is more like a deck that has a bunch of creatures with the same subtype. At least Allies, Elves, and Eldrazi can all be decks because they work off each other.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 Yep, not even a deck- that's why it takes multiple spots in the Daily Events EVERY SINGLE TIME. It may not be the best deck for the meta, but to say "it isn't even a deck" is shear lunacy, and utter retardation. Do you even play Magic?
ubernerd35 1 year ago
@ubernerd35 Yes, but obviously you didn't get what I was saying. But what I was trying to convey is that it shouldn't have it's own deck name etc. Like Elf decks can be Elf decks because they even have Tribal Spells that count as "Elf Cards" and elves work off other elves. Honestly how many Vampire cards work off each other? Like what 2 or 3? The same goes for Eldrazi. Hell even back when Treefolk creatures were around they still worked off eachother. Yes Vampires is a deck but it isn't unique.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 XD Magic 101: a stack of atleast 60 Magic: The Gathering Trading Cards...is a Deck :)
HazardFlame 1 year ago
@HazardFlame You honestly aren't seeing what I am saying. YES it is a physical deck. But it shouldn't be called a "Vampire deck" it should be called a Mono Black deck with Vampires. All the Mono Black decks using Vampires are just an assembly of creatures with the the same type. You are honestly too stupid to insult.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 ouch my pride :[ lmfao.
HazardFlame 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 The Boros bushwhacker deck had nothing to do with Boros, it was just white red and fast, but it was a name that communicated the message quickly to those familiar with it. So Vampires is just the name for the deck in standard, whether you feel the definition is appropriate or not. Also, insulting people because you communicated your message badly is just plain pathetic.
ihateirony 1 year ago
@ihateirony I communicated my message fine. It isn't my fault people can't read properly.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 No, you didn't, you phrased it poorly. In any case, language is functional, f you produce a sentence that is easily misunderstood then it is your fault for not working around that possibility.
ihateirony 1 year ago
@ihateirony Again what I said was fine and easily understandable. It is not my fault illiterate magic players can't read what I say. Sorry, I actually use my English.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 Look, if you don't understand your blunder then obviously you don't know anything about language.
ihateirony 1 year ago
@ihateirony I have yet to even see your logic and your proof to your disingenuous assertions.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 Language is a functional social construction between people, it is not a static entity that any single person can have the authority on. As such, if you communicate a message and the majority of people misinterpret it then you made the mistake, you cannot claim that they were wrong and you weren't as what is right is determined by the majority when it comes to language. Hell, the way we learn language is through trial and error.It's how behavioural linguistics work.
ihateirony 1 year ago
@ihateirony Obviously you just gave a definition to language. And you gave an example that simply used the fact two people didn't understand what I said. When it is totally possible that the two people made the same mistake. But you again did not do what I said. I said you have yet to provide proof of your disingenuous assertions. You did NOT give an example from what I said to prove that you are right.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 The point is that if the two people can make the same mistake then it is your fault for producing a sentence that can be easily misunderstood. People far greater than you or I have debated this years ago and my side came out on top. What do you need an example for, you said that it isn't a deck and you meant that it isn't a proper deck type and as such people interpreted you as a simpleton who thought it wasn't a physical deck. I don't see why you need an example when it's central
ihateirony 1 year ago
@ihateirony I can't see how it is my fault since it is their fault they can't read between the lines. I don't consider a deck to be just a specific amount of cards. My original statement mentioned nothing about it not being a physical deck. If I make a deck with 60 forest in it is it still a deck? All the forest can still represent Vampires, just an assembly of similar cards in a format that is used to meet legal standards. Oh wow I didn't go into in depth detail on how I think it isn't a deck.
SarkhanVol151 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SarkhanVol151 It's your fault because you porduced the sentence in order to communicate the point and you failed to communicate it. If you're talking to a three year old and you tell them "a spank will be administered contingent on your behaviour" and they don't understand you it's your fault for not trying to work around limitations. You didn't need to go into depth, you just need have used different words, i.e. "it isn't a proper deck type" rather than "It isn't even a deck"
ihateirony 1 year ago
@SarkhanVol151 LSV said the same thing, I wonder where you got your opinion from? Eldrazi work off eachother? Vamps function togather more then eldrazi do....you fail.
Intotheorchard 1 year ago
HURRRRR
I'M A HOERS
thesxex 1 year ago
Gerry, i love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, your awesome
DuckyTheRubber 1 year ago
I love this guy, he's awesome. he's so out of place
moosemooseson 1 year ago
Gerry isn't whiny, he hates on whiners.
YoshiOfADown 1 year ago 2
Gerry is awesome.
vigil8686 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gerry is a douche. Wish he'd realize that Magic corrolates to things completely unrelated to "cool". As for deckbuilder, I can't say he's done anything that would make me think he's a great deckbuilder. Come on, Vengavine in Naya.... Even the weakest of Magic minds knew that that was an obvious place for Vengi....
Oh well, he is a decent player....
tonyadpx 1 year ago
@tonyadpx how about inventing Thopter Depths
vigil8686 1 year ago 2
@tonyadpx He's not a douche- it's just his sense of humor. He is actually one of the non-douchebaggiest pros competing in the upper levels of the game.
ubernerd35 1 year ago 16
@tonyadpx Magic is cool.
gothikgamer 5 months ago
I wanna destroy Thompson for the silly fashion in which he wears his hat.
TheRealCakekey 1 year ago 3
He sure as Hell isn't my "favorite deck designer". I can't fucking stand that asshole, he's such a whiny bitch.
Coldbrand 1 year ago
@Coldbrand You sound like the only whiny bitch here.
HikariKage 1 year ago
How came Vampire Nighthawk not be that great? It stops many great green fatties. I have a vampire deck that focuses around returning cards like these to my hand or deck.
TheAts1991 1 year ago 2
Woah all the videos were good quality up to here
Ballinlolz 1 year ago
@Ballinlolz hd takes an hour or something to work
vankilsing 1 year ago
+1 for Gerry T with his cockyness
-1 for the bad quality of this video
jonjonteru 1 year ago
@jonjonteru
and what's gerryt's ultimate?
rabblerouser 1 year ago