UPDATE-----The shadows seen on the side of the creature is quite clear for those who wish to state the obvious. The long shadow seen under the arm is cast perfectly as the creature takes long strides.
That is clear to any observer. The point I was attempting to make in the video is that at no time does the creature cast a shadow upon the earth –not on the ground, not on a rock, not even on any of the trees or sticks in the background
–Hell, for that matter, this creature doesn’t even kick up a “puff” of dust! With a male Bigfoot projected to weigh anywhere from 800-1000lbs –weighing that much there should be an abundant of footprints leading directly back to this creatures chamber.
As we all know that’s just not the case. What animal in nature only leaves two footprints at a time; a 100-pound deer can be easily tracked for miles before tracks are lost. Are we to believe that a 1000lbs “Sasquatch” only leaves one or two tracks for which people make plaster castings out of?
“Shapeshifters” can’t be tracked because they need not leave the area if they can camouflage themselves successfully as seen in this video. In the original footage you can see what appear to be trees’ casting shadows upon the creature back at least twice.
The first time this is noticed, is when the creature walks between two trees. The second time is just after passing the second tree. What’s interesting is near the beginning of the footage, there is a large fallen limb seen lying between the photographer and the creature.
This limb clearly shows the shadow directly beneath the limb. Now, using this downed limb as a reference of the position of the sun that day, you can see the sun is directly overhead. No long shadow will exist at any location were the sun is directly overhead. This may answer why we do not see the creatures’ shadow, but does not explain the long narrow shadows seen on the creatures back –experts cannot have it both ways. Trees will only cast a small circle of a shadow directly under the tree.
Long shadows only occur when the sun is low in the sky. And if the sun was low in the sky, the limb would not show the shadow directly beneath it. If I am right and this is truly a “Shapeshifter” casting shadow upon itself to complete the illusion would be an easy task in comparison to controlling such a mast amount of spirit energy in the first place.
And that analysist intentionally does not notice the shadow of the right hand on her body's right side, and saying that "no hint of the shadow"; he does not notice also the shadow of the creature on trees when it passes them...
I studied attentively that video - about PG film it's just "sucked from a finger", as we say here in Russia. Just the ill imagination of a religious fanatic! Can the "optical illusion" leave the material footprints? I have the casts of them.
And as to "the rump murph" the analysist intentionally does not mention the left hand which is moving back and it lookes like "shifting the rump shape" I see here the deliberate falsification of facts
UPDATE-----The shadows seen on the side of the creature is quite clear for those who wish to state the obvious. The long shadow seen under the arm is cast perfectly as the creature takes long strides.
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
NEW UPDATE VIDEO HERE on Youtube-----> "Proof that Patterson captured Bigfoot spirit of energy"
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
That is clear to any observer. The point I was attempting to make in the video is that at no time does the creature cast a shadow upon the earth –not on the ground, not on a rock, not even on any of the trees or sticks in the background
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
–Hell, for that matter, this creature doesn’t even kick up a “puff” of dust! With a male Bigfoot projected to weigh anywhere from 800-1000lbs –weighing that much there should be an abundant of footprints leading directly back to this creatures chamber.
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
As we all know that’s just not the case. What animal in nature only leaves two footprints at a time; a 100-pound deer can be easily tracked for miles before tracks are lost. Are we to believe that a 1000lbs “Sasquatch” only leaves one or two tracks for which people make plaster castings out of?
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
“Shapeshifters” can’t be tracked because they need not leave the area if they can camouflage themselves successfully as seen in this video. In the original footage you can see what appear to be trees’ casting shadows upon the creature back at least twice.
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
The first time this is noticed, is when the creature walks between two trees. The second time is just after passing the second tree. What’s interesting is near the beginning of the footage, there is a large fallen limb seen lying between the photographer and the creature.
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
This limb clearly shows the shadow directly beneath the limb. Now, using this downed limb as a reference of the position of the sun that day, you can see the sun is directly overhead. No long shadow will exist at any location were the sun is directly overhead. This may answer why we do not see the creatures’ shadow, but does not explain the long narrow shadows seen on the creatures back –experts cannot have it both ways. Trees will only cast a small circle of a shadow directly under the tree.
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
Long shadows only occur when the sun is low in the sky. And if the sun was low in the sky, the limb would not show the shadow directly beneath it. If I am right and this is truly a “Shapeshifter” casting shadow upon itself to complete the illusion would be an easy task in comparison to controlling such a mast amount of spirit energy in the first place.
AutoProWalls 2 months ago
Native American Shaman are so called Shapeshifters... makes u think
SuMBuDDe42oE 2 months ago
And that analysist intentionally does not notice the shadow of the right hand on her body's right side, and saying that "no hint of the shadow"; he does not notice also the shadow of the creature on trees when it passes them...
IgorBurtsev1 2 months ago
I studied attentively that video - about PG film it's just "sucked from a finger", as we say here in Russia. Just the ill imagination of a religious fanatic! Can the "optical illusion" leave the material footprints? I have the casts of them.
And as to "the rump murph" the analysist intentionally does not mention the left hand which is moving back and it lookes like "shifting the rump shape" I see here the deliberate falsification of facts
IgorBurtsev1 2 months ago
very interesting
lita9281 2 months ago