DON'T READ THIS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY YOUR LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFEHOWEVER IF YOU DON'T POST THIS ON THEk NEXT THREE VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN THE NEXT TWO DAYS. NOW, YOU'VE ALREADY STARTEDREADING DON'T STOP. THIS IS SCARY PUT THIS ON THE FIVE VIDEOS IN THE NEXT 143 MINUTES. WHEN YOU ARE DONE PRESS f6 AND YOUR LOVERS NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN. THIS IS SCARY CAUSE IT WORKS :D
At the start of the movie before Leonardo Di Caprio got no to the ship, the Titanic was in Cobh in real life (it is in the movie too). I live the're today. The last place the Titanic was before it sank.
3 days ago n 1876, a young girl named Jenn was walking down a river, an insane man killed her by stabbing her in the back, raping her, and then hanging her in his closet. While he hanged her he said Bukakke Bukkake. Now that you have read this message, she will find you and her dead body will haunt your house for 5 years. Every night you go to sleep she will appear in your closet, hanging their with her glowing red eyes. repost 3 times to be saved krisarrow
@SMGJohn IDK, it would seem like a criminal waste of the contractors' time and energy, as well as over 100 million dollars to just destroy it after completion. However your comment gets a LOLZ!!!
@SMGJohn First of all, there would probably be no icebergs around. Second of all, that is illegal. The water was freezing, it was below 20 degrees. Most of the people would've died from hypothermia. If you're in that water for 30 minutes, you'll die no matter what. It's not possible to re-act the tragedy that happened. So they did it on shore in Mexico. (NOTE: Most of the extras were Mexicans). Now you have nothing to say to what I just explained.
awsome! want to see something else thats cool, type in The shadewagon. some lady in utah invented it, i seen it on the today show. sure thing everyone will have one in the next ten years or so.
God I would have given ANYTHING to have been part of that movie if I was old enough back in 1997...... I still cry sometimes knowing I missed out on the chance of a liftime to be aboard that ship replica......
in real life the dock was on the other side, so instead of rebuild they wrote words backwards then flipped the image horizontally - i saw it on the dvd extras :p
@needleonthevinyl and the facked that they based the movie on a love story more then they did the tragity that was wrong 2 i mean the movie is 1 of my favrits but thats only becous i care about the ship
@moneymaker8815 it takes away from the look of the movie...so they built this but smaller for the movie of course. between each funnel they removed 20 feet so building materials could be kept to a minimum.
@Snakeuserorochi Ok...,but that still looks like a lot. I mean, cg still looks ok...,kinda.Plus, do you see them on deck a lot? Can't they just build the parts or places they are on the deck instead of the whole thing?
@moneymaker8815 yea i get what your saying but cameron wanted as many shots that portrayed the ship in its entirety and full beauty. CG can do that but it would take a lot longer. depth is an issue with CG and during the whole sinking/ entire movie, that would have been a hindrance.
@MO3MINI are you talking about the funnels? because they didnt store animals in the extra funnel. it actually did work. it was used to let out steam from the kitchens and stuff.
@Titanicluver321 yes it was used and not to the extent that many think. it was used for storage for deck chairs and other useful storage but like you said, it had a few small pipes that let out steam from kitchens and such.
@poptimistisk Yes and no, Titanic had three funnels for the smoke to be released from, the fourth one was used as a vent. steam from the cooking rooms and such.
This Titanic wasn't the full ship - it was only 100 feet shorter and made mostly of wood on the exterior so they could film the dramatic scenes more easily. The rest of the titanic scenes were done mostly by way of taking an actual ship out that had the same engine room found on the actual titanic and filming in the engine room (i.e. the full ahead and full stop scenes)
Yes, they used one of the last surviving Liberty ships -- they just rescaled the gauges and such so as to give the impression you were in the actual titanic engine room when the engine was on full ahead and full stop for the scenes required.
They didnt build the ENTIRE ship, just the outside and inside it were only the rooms they needed. The rest was a hollow shell. Also it cost enough to put paramount and fox into dept and if the movie wasnt a success they would have gone bankrupt. After they finished the movie they tore the ship apart and sold it for scrap metal.
thats a bit over dramatic. The studios knew the cost going into the making of the movie. They already consider if it didnt make a dime well before going into production. I know becuase i went to USC and some of the production crew talk to us about that, and how the studios worked back then vs now.
Except this was built out of wood, steel, aluminum, and plastic. The real thing was built out of steel, much, much thicker, actually usable steel, and wood. The wood used in this was lumber, not "functional" wood.
The walls on the set are fake, nothing's behind most of them. And it certainly can't float.
It was also only built half. The other half wasn't detailed, and shots in the movie showing the other side were just side this, flipped.
its Not a real Ship u idiots it was made as fake background set all the scenes that were inside the ship which was most of the movie were filmed in a studio this was only used for the on deck scenes
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
it ashame its actually over 100feet shorter than the original titanic.. and that shows in the film especially when the camera is recording on the boat deck with leonardo and kate
if you watch the documentary, they only made the starboard side of the ship, which you saw in this vid, but not the other half. Also they put the ship in the wrong direction, lol
thats why they shoot the scenes in the opposite direction because the ship is facing in the wrong direction. . the reason is, because James Cameron was basing the wind direction so that when the funnels are smoked, the smoke would be in the proper direction too. . .they also flipped the White Starline Logo's and other names so that in post production, they would flipped it in the correct place. . .
holy caca!! i never knew they BUILT the set! i just thought they went to some random place... well, i was 4 when it came out, but now im 13.. but STILL! damn.. mustve cost A LOT 0_0
Bloody little kids on youtube... I saw it in theaters. I was 12 ^^
Also, I read that they only built half the ship, so for scenes with the opposite side, they had to make the actors wear mirror-image clothing and then switch the film around in post-production.
@Brettmeden Are you on crack? Titanic cost $200 million to make. Rebuilding the Titanic with all-new modern-day technology was estimated at nearly $2 BILLION.
And no, it still wouldn't cost THAT much. Yes, if you did build it, today, with new tech, yes it would obviously cost more, though. Of course, with new tech it wouldn't be the same at all, it would not even remotely look the same; it'd just be the Queen Mary 2, or something like that.
I remember reading certain laws that govern shipbuilding would prevent a replica from being made (even with stronger materials) because of the way it was built, the shape of it (internally, not just outside appearance). That you would have to make certain fundamental changes to the design because it's unsound compared to the modern way of building ships.
So even if it was remade with stronger materials & computers and whatnot installed; if was shaped the same it would not be allowed to sail.
Of course, if you made the hull and all other important key structural sections out of nano-carbon tubes / nanocarbon fibres (you can build space elevators out of this stuff), then that's a different story... Then it would be super strong, and be able to be of any shape and withstand pretty much ANYTHING that was thrown at it. It would actually pretty much be unsinkable, and weigh much less.
But also of course, it would cost much more to make.
@SlLENTHlLL I believe the problem is that the bow of the ship is too sharp, aka it is like a dagger and if it hit another ship it would shear it in two. In fact that already happened in the past when the Olympic cut a ship in half with her bow.
@SlLENTHlLL Your facts are incorrect. Titanic II is actually in the planning as we speak. Same design, yet much stronger material & top-of-the-line technology. The blueprint is planned to be completed & presented for approval by the 100-year anniversary of the sinking.
@SlLENTHlLL Those facts are incorrect. Titanic II is actually in the planning as we speak. Inconel 625 metal, top-of-the-line technology & the same design! :-D They plan to have it built & sailing by April 12, 2012, marking the 100-year anniversary of the sinking.
Rod Serling (of the Twilight Zone)knew that the Lusitania was a much more important sip than the Titanic and he wrote a TZ ep where a man travels back in time to try to stop the Lusitania from getting torpedoed (an act which brought the US into World War One where as the T
This has been flagged as spam show
DON'T READ THIS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY YOUR LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFEHOWEVER IF YOU DON'T POST THIS ON THEk NEXT THREE VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN THE NEXT TWO DAYS. NOW, YOU'VE ALREADY STARTEDREADING DON'T STOP. THIS IS SCARY PUT THIS ON THE FIVE VIDEOS IN THE NEXT 143 MINUTES. WHEN YOU ARE DONE PRESS f6 AND YOUR LOVERS NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN. THIS IS SCARY CAUSE IT WORKS :D
xJawz71 1 month ago
how long did it take for them to make this for the movie?
yamha 5 months ago
@yamha
The main filming took about 160 days.
The whole thing took around two years I think.
Usul573 3 months ago
At the start of the movie before Leonardo Di Caprio got no to the ship, the Titanic was in Cobh in real life (it is in the movie too). I live the're today. The last place the Titanic was before it sank.
Oisin34 5 months ago
how's this"ship'now?
wl022990991 6 months ago
gr8 :)
ActorSunnyIndia 7 months ago
@lauriemam
I knew that and I am not what you call me. =P
TheGuitarplayer12345 8 months ago
They built a whole ship....Ok, normal....(I'm kidding, right)
ntinakar1 9 months ago
@ntinakar1 Just a little ship of nothing ! :p
It's always impressionant...
Kozuechan2894 7 months ago
back then IT WAS a biggest ship in the world, And cost what ? . Today We can rebuild the same ship just to make one movie!
nukeurhouse12 9 months ago
@nukeurhouse12 About $7.5 million dollars, which was about $400 million today. any dumbass who gives a crap about titanic would no that :P
lauriemama 9 months ago
@nukeurhouse12 infact just rebuild the whole dang ship! Working propellers and everything!!
mrlego611 6 months ago
It cost $1,00,0,000,0,00,00000,0 to build. That's a lot of commas! :O
frogboy7000 9 months ago
all that effort to build the Titanic again for it to sink again. ON CAMERA!
jay6550 9 months ago
so....what did they do with the set afterwards?
bobscanfly 9 months ago
@bobscanfly ya i like to know too
MrAceman441 9 months ago
wow that was amazing
gogocartoon11 9 months ago
did you know it took over £100,000,0 to make?
jay6550 10 months ago
@jay6550 that's not a number
sep800wastakenwtf 10 months ago
@sep800wastakenwtf it is, it is over £(one million), only a idiot would NOT know that the number 100,000,0 is 1 million
jay6550 10 months ago
@jay6550
1,000,000 = a million
100,000,0 = something you just made up
sep800wastakenwtf 9 months ago 2
@jay6550 sort your commas out kid.
mikegiard 8 months ago
@mikegiard fuck you
jay6550 8 months ago
All that work to build it again, just to let it sink again... on camera!
Hobbitstomper 10 months ago
Leave it there and NEVER take it apart.
crazyracer12 10 months ago
JAMES CAMERON SURE KNOWS HOW TO GO TO THE ALL OUT WITH HIS MOVIES
JOHNBASS117111 10 months ago
@VanishingData Who would go on a replica of a ship that was doomed, where heaps of people died?
tonykool2 11 months ago
damn . . . i was wondering how they got such good graphics for a movie made in '97 . .
shitt thats nice
metzgerboy14 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 days ago n 1876, a young girl named Jenn was walking down a river, an insane man killed her by stabbing her in the back, raping her, and then hanging her in his closet. While he hanged her he said Bukakke Bukkake. Now that you have read this message, she will find you and her dead body will haunt your house for 5 years. Every night you go to sleep she will appear in your closet, hanging their with her glowing red eyes. repost 3 times to be saved krisarrow
minamu8 11 months ago
Can that be driven on water?
MichiganFann 11 months ago
Love those memories of working on such amazing movie.
my scenes can be seen here, look for the video:
VsJRNCUbTVs here on youtube
williamwebbdesign 11 months ago
at least let carnival have it. besides, they was white star line...
rocker78able 1 year ago
Director: good job guys! Now can you take it apart.
friesed 1 year ago
bet they crashed it by accident b4 the ship was floating
jimmyvbs 1 year ago
I WONDER, HOW MANY DAYS WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO COMPLETE THIS SET!!!!!!!!
kingortail 1 year ago
Yeah LOL, with the money they spent doing the damn movie they could have just made the original ship. xD
SirFancyBubbles 1 year ago
@SirFancyBubbles they would've needed twice the money for that though. titanic in todays money=over 400 million; movie= 200 million.
rgur90x 1 year ago
i remember going to Rosarito Mexico as a 7 yeal old and always wondering what the hell they were building i thought it was a real ship !
mcbece 1 year ago
how did you get this footage its really cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
MegaTitanicfreak 1 year ago
you all do realized that this ship here was made funnels first, and never launched??? lmao
alifajardo1999 1 year ago
Why not build the whole damn thing and drive it on a iceberg again and film it...
SMGJohn 1 year ago 84
@SMGJohn I asked me the same thing before seen your comment
josex360x 1 year ago
@SMGJohn IDK, it would seem like a criminal waste of the contractors' time and energy, as well as over 100 million dollars to just destroy it after completion. However your comment gets a LOLZ!!!
fROmTh3fUTURe 11 months ago
@SMGJohn v HAHHAHAAH cause no one wants to be stranded with the retched white girl in the end thats why the white guy drowned him self lol
chamblizi 10 months ago
@SMGJohn since cameron made one billion dollars out of the film, he could have done it!
Antphoneigh 8 months ago
@SMGJohn because the actors ould risk thier lives and die
TheRatedrko12 7 months ago
@SMGJohn First of all, there would probably be no icebergs around. Second of all, that is illegal. The water was freezing, it was below 20 degrees. Most of the people would've died from hypothermia. If you're in that water for 30 minutes, you'll die no matter what. It's not possible to re-act the tragedy that happened. So they did it on shore in Mexico. (NOTE: Most of the extras were Mexicans). Now you have nothing to say to what I just explained.
sacramentolove 4 months ago
@sacramentolove he said it as a joke man.. chill..
jiyefuuu 4 months ago
awsome! want to see something else thats cool, type in The shadewagon. some lady in utah invented it, i seen it on the today show. sure thing everyone will have one in the next ten years or so.
flaker1971 1 year ago
yeop just wat i was thinking rebuild and film is again but then not for sinking but for use the safe way :P unsinkeble??/
pCneter 1 year ago
God I would have given ANYTHING to have been part of that movie if I was old enough back in 1997...... I still cry sometimes knowing I missed out on the chance of a liftime to be aboard that ship replica......
DrnkSqrrlProductions 1 year ago
They made the ship in 45 second, no wonder it sank..
BSChargeX 1 year ago 3
@BSChargeX
Now THAT'S a sense of humour
jeffmay1 1 year ago
@BSChargeX xDDDDDDDDD
SaphirSky 1 year ago
in real life the dock was on the other side, so instead of rebuild they wrote words backwards then flipped the image horizontally - i saw it on the dvd extras :p
twizy123 1 year ago
did they really build a ship? it would off been simpler just to make a minie verstion and photoshot everythink
fifi3691 1 year ago
It was an ugly tree amyway.
Moleson3MC 1 year ago
Looks just like the Harland & Wolff shipyard would have looked like back in 1912...
AspireAS5920 1 year ago
They just build the whole ship?
deurkl 1 year ago
i never relised tehy build a new ship for the theme ha
goldmine1995 1 year ago
the titanic was an EPIC ship. the only thing wrong with it was the whole running it into a fucking huge iceberg part.
needleonthevinyl 1 year ago
@needleonthevinyl and the facked that they based the movie on a love story more then they did the tragity that was wrong 2 i mean the movie is 1 of my favrits but thats only becous i care about the ship
fatkeith20 1 year ago
too fast!!! :)
amy00able 1 year ago 2
actual boat? or just a dud?
Titanicfan1234567890 1 year ago
cant they just...,wats it called...,CG i think...
moneymaker8815 1 year ago
@moneymaker8815 it takes away from the look of the movie...so they built this but smaller for the movie of course. between each funnel they removed 20 feet so building materials could be kept to a minimum.
Snakeuserorochi 1 year ago
@Snakeuserorochi Ok...,but that still looks like a lot. I mean, cg still looks ok...,kinda.Plus, do you see them on deck a lot? Can't they just build the parts or places they are on the deck instead of the whole thing?
moneymaker8815 1 year ago
@moneymaker8815 yea i get what your saying but cameron wanted as many shots that portrayed the ship in its entirety and full beauty. CG can do that but it would take a lot longer. depth is an issue with CG and during the whole sinking/ entire movie, that would have been a hindrance.
Snakeuserorochi 1 year ago
@Snakeuserorochi Oh, then, I suppose. Then ok. I understand, thank you.
moneymaker8815 1 year ago
I always wonder why they didn't actually just build another titanic, the set looks almost the real deal
cupmike 1 year ago
It wasn't sunk for the movie, it was scrapped.
ForgeOfIntelligence 1 year ago
They spend millions on the titanic. Too bad they got to sink it for the movie xD
ExtremeAllianceClan 1 year ago
EPIC
xxddsw22345xx 1 year ago
wow! how long did it take them to make that?
jillykk44 1 year ago
You wouldn't believe they'd actually and ACCURATELY clone the Titanic to near-scale just to sink it...again...
WonkyTonkBotty 1 year ago
that was pretty damn kool
Lilyankee2424 1 year ago
didn't the actual titanic just have 3 chimneys?
poptimistisk 1 year ago
4 smokestacks, 3 that worked.
standingcam 1 year ago 2
yes it had three that connected to the engines and then the fourth was used to store animals
MO3MINI 1 year ago
@MO3MINI are you talking about the funnels? because they didnt store animals in the extra funnel. it actually did work. it was used to let out steam from the kitchens and stuff.
Titanicluver321 1 year ago
@Titanicluver321 yes it was used and not to the extent that many think. it was used for storage for deck chairs and other useful storage but like you said, it had a few small pipes that let out steam from kitchens and such.
Snakeuserorochi 1 year ago
it had four the last one was more like a dummy
Lilyankee2424 1 year ago
@poptimistisk Yes and no, Titanic had three funnels for the smoke to be released from, the fourth one was used as a vent. steam from the cooking rooms and such.
crazyracer12 10 months ago
people in belfast are still proud of the Titanic
54687y 2 years ago 49
@54687y i am proud of it im not from belfast
ebonyholden 1 year ago
@54687y Do you blame them?
sufkiller 1 year ago
@54687y Pfft, Proud of a tin can that 'cant' Sink.
mcrdude08 1 year ago
This Titanic wasn't the full ship - it was only 100 feet shorter and made mostly of wood on the exterior so they could film the dramatic scenes more easily. The rest of the titanic scenes were done mostly by way of taking an actual ship out that had the same engine room found on the actual titanic and filming in the engine room (i.e. the full ahead and full stop scenes)
Sanosuke004 2 years ago 4
@Sanosuke004: Mostly of wood? I'm not surpriesed this ship sank!
Just kidding, it's amazing that they builted almost a new titanic, must have been very expencive! :)
NavidH91 2 years ago 2
Didn't they use one of the last surviving Liberty ships to do the engine room sequences?
1814Brandan 2 years ago 2
Yes, they used one of the last surviving Liberty ships -- they just rescaled the gauges and such so as to give the impression you were in the actual titanic engine room when the engine was on full ahead and full stop for the scenes required.
Sanosuke004 2 years ago
stupid hoes they didn't rebuild the entire ship. they had many large scale models and built only half (stern side) of the entire ship to actual scale
Lisnotforloser 2 years ago 3
this is sick
simonsaidwhat 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch the widescreen version on my channel...
Anything2DoWithFilm 2 years ago
im a dumass, but do you think that replica of titanic could sail? or is there no bottom so the water could get in?
workerbee2000000 2 years ago
@workerbee2000000 - how fuckin stupid are you
maxbedford1987 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im only 8. i dont like titanic anymore.
workerbee2000000 2 years ago
i hope they know they just rebuilt the whole fricken shit...
TheStemi4ever 2 years ago
they jus made another one
TheSaberman20 2 years ago 4
omg!I didn't know they built the whole ship...How much could that have cost?
orifiel17 2 years ago
They didnt build the ENTIRE ship, just the outside and inside it were only the rooms they needed. The rest was a hollow shell. Also it cost enough to put paramount and fox into dept and if the movie wasnt a success they would have gone bankrupt. After they finished the movie they tore the ship apart and sold it for scrap metal.
ElChrisman99 2 years ago
thats a bit over dramatic. The studios knew the cost going into the making of the movie. They already consider if it didnt make a dime well before going into production. I know becuase i went to USC and some of the production crew talk to us about that, and how the studios worked back then vs now.
newm123 2 years ago
im in shock here too its actually nuts!
clarkgable22 2 years ago 3
that looks real motha fuckin expensive got damn
Jmontanez95 2 years ago
i think this movie cost around 130 mil to make, but it made like 10 times that :D
nela04 2 years ago
how
Jmontanez95 2 years ago
The film had a budget (in US Dollars) of $200 million and it's Gross Revenue (Film's income (in US Dollars)
$1 ,848 ,813 ,795
SSPoseidon846 2 years ago 2
it would be really daunting to walk around on that replica
musefeverfever 2 years ago
yah lol! it would be like....flashback....uh this is wierd lol!
newyorkgirl24 2 years ago
ho lyyyyyyyyyyyyy shit!
Well i wasn't expecting they actualy made a REPLICA!
But than again .97, What were you expecting.
If they made it today they would use computers....
enterprise0709 2 years ago
Yea. But the computer effects make it crappy. Well most of the time.
Like that twilight movie.
i mean seriously would want to pay for that crap. If you want to "watch the actual movie" or a better version of it then just get the book , right?
The titanic movie was/is incredible. I watch it for the first time when i was 3 and i sat throught the whole thing (according to my mommmy xD)
iamstupiderthanyou 2 years ago
huh?
ken77shin 2 years ago
Hey you guys build titanic! Make a floating one!!
ug5151 2 years ago
you know there are reasons why it is considered a legend.
t7g6s8 2 years ago
Yeah, as opposed to the original... O.o
TheRealmsOfGold 2 years ago
Wow,no wonder the titanic movie was so expensive to make.
TheOneofakind17 2 years ago
i read that it costed more to make this set than it took to actually make titanic!!!
Hellcome2play 2 years ago
Sheesh, they might as well just build a real Titanic.
FortitudeOfHeaven 2 years ago 43
@FortitudeOfHeaven naah it would just sink..
godpotat 1 year ago
@FortitudeOfHeaven
Except this was built out of wood, steel, aluminum, and plastic. The real thing was built out of steel, much, much thicker, actually usable steel, and wood. The wood used in this was lumber, not "functional" wood.
The walls on the set are fake, nothing's behind most of them. And it certainly can't float.
It was also only built half. The other half wasn't detailed, and shots in the movie showing the other side were just side this, flipped.
Draknfyre 1 year ago
Comment removed
Tman545380 1 year ago
woh, thats cool
spartan4821 2 years ago
its Not a real Ship u idiots it was made as fake background set all the scenes that were inside the ship which was most of the movie were filmed in a studio this was only used for the on deck scenes
billiejones25 2 years ago
And dont forget
billiejones25
SOME OF THE SCENES WHERE JUST TINY MODELS O_O
LuigiLuigi8989 2 years ago
OMG That must of taken ages to build for the film! And to think it only gets smashed up lol
WorldwideJukebox 2 years ago
man they built a real boat impressive where is it floating
xaajeh 3 years ago
Very impressive!
Mrknightleywashere 3 years ago 2
who cares if its 100 ft shorter it looks like it and its cool the movie got four stars it wont make the movie more worse
ghosrob1 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it ashame its actually over 100feet shorter than the original titanic.. and that shows in the film especially when the camera is recording on the boat deck with leonardo and kate
godseesnocolour 3 years ago
do they still have this ship? i mean they couldnt of destroyed it
jlagraba 3 years ago
That they did...
response to jlagraba
statboy08 3 years ago
if you watch the documentary, they only made the starboard side of the ship, which you saw in this vid, but not the other half. Also they put the ship in the wrong direction, lol
phantomofhepiano 3 years ago 2
thats why they shoot the scenes in the opposite direction because the ship is facing in the wrong direction. . the reason is, because James Cameron was basing the wind direction so that when the funnels are smoked, the smoke would be in the proper direction too. . .they also flipped the White Starline Logo's and other names so that in post production, they would flipped it in the correct place. . .
yenyd14344 2 years ago 4
its destroyed. when they used it for sinking, the water had dsintergrated the exterior of the ship(which was made from wood)
ALEE775 3 years ago
coolio
kateswebcast 3 years ago
why did they build the stern first?
bubsy385 3 years ago
it takes less pieces but however back of the ship requires alot of parts includin the propelller and engine
76BLADERUNNER 3 years ago
oh... kk
bubsy385 3 years ago
there were no propellers in this titanic set. The ship doesnt even move. Its basically made from scaffolding and the exterior is made from wood.
ALEE775 3 years ago
with a green screen?
ThePivotAdventures 2 years ago
That is amazing
sorealDude 3 years ago
thats cany amazing :|
jakelovesthetoon 3 years ago
I drive by that set every time i go to mexico it is right off the toll road pretty cool they use it for a lot of movies.
bibasone 3 years ago
did they keep this up after the movie was over?
StrawRabbi 3 years ago
wow is that to scale of what the actual titanic was anyone?
ares12790 3 years ago 2
90% to the real ship! :o
mangosalado 3 years ago 2
holy caca!! i never knew they BUILT the set! i just thought they went to some random place... well, i was 4 when it came out, but now im 13.. but STILL! damn.. mustve cost A LOT 0_0
jkiwi418 3 years ago 2
Bloody little kids on youtube... I saw it in theaters. I was 12 ^^
Also, I read that they only built half the ship, so for scenes with the opposite side, they had to make the actors wear mirror-image clothing and then switch the film around in post-production.
Yonkage 3 years ago 2
your bloody
leon625 3 years ago
it cost more to make a film about the titanic than it cost them to actually build the real titanic
Brettmeden 3 years ago 22
and it took longer to watch the movie than to both make a film and to build the real titanic :P
x4that 3 years ago 5
@Brettmeden yeah because they had to pay the actors props and the upkeep of the set they were using
ebonyholden 1 year ago
@Brettmeden Are you on crack? Titanic cost $200 million to make. Rebuilding the Titanic with all-new modern-day technology was estimated at nearly $2 BILLION.
Somborac420 1 year ago
@Somborac420
No, that's just because of the Federal Reserve.
And no, it still wouldn't cost THAT much. Yes, if you did build it, today, with new tech, yes it would obviously cost more, though. Of course, with new tech it wouldn't be the same at all, it would not even remotely look the same; it'd just be the Queen Mary 2, or something like that.
SlLENTHlLL 1 year ago
@SlLENTHlLL Actually no, it wouldn't. I would be the SAME design. Just a stronger material & updated technology.
Somborac420 1 year ago
I remember reading certain laws that govern shipbuilding would prevent a replica from being made (even with stronger materials) because of the way it was built, the shape of it (internally, not just outside appearance). That you would have to make certain fundamental changes to the design because it's unsound compared to the modern way of building ships.
So even if it was remade with stronger materials & computers and whatnot installed; if was shaped the same it would not be allowed to sail.
SlLENTHlLL 1 year ago 8
@SlLENTHlLL
Of course, if you made the hull and all other important key structural sections out of nano-carbon tubes / nanocarbon fibres (you can build space elevators out of this stuff), then that's a different story... Then it would be super strong, and be able to be of any shape and withstand pretty much ANYTHING that was thrown at it. It would actually pretty much be unsinkable, and weigh much less.
But also of course, it would cost much more to make.
SlLENTHlLL 1 year ago 3
@SlLENTHlLL I believe the problem is that the bow of the ship is too sharp, aka it is like a dagger and if it hit another ship it would shear it in two. In fact that already happened in the past when the Olympic cut a ship in half with her bow.
Forceman77 1 year ago
Comment removed
Somborac420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SlLENTHlLL Your facts are incorrect. Titanic II is actually in the planning as we speak. Same design, yet much stronger material & top-of-the-line technology. The blueprint is planned to be completed & presented for approval by the 100-year anniversary of the sinking.
Somborac420 1 year ago
@SlLENTHlLL Those facts are incorrect. Titanic II is actually in the planning as we speak. Inconel 625 metal, top-of-the-line technology & the same design! :-D They plan to have it built & sailing by April 12, 2012, marking the 100-year anniversary of the sinking.
Somborac420 1 year ago
@Somborac420
lol
SlLENTHlLL 1 year ago
@SlLENTHlLL I doubt a modern version would run on steam anyway :O
user321 6 months ago
@Somborac420 Let alone insurance on a ship named Titanic would be like $400,000,000a month..
mulder1021 1 year ago
@mulder1021 Nope, significantly less than that.
Somborac420 1 year ago
man i cant belive they redone most of the out side of the boat must of cost them a fortune
itsameadelio 3 years ago
does anyone know where the set location was?
DrVladDracula 3 years ago
In Rosarito, Mexico.
judithdehaan 3 years ago
I know the set designer personally. His name is Dennis and he lives a couple miles from me.
DRKBULLETX 3 years ago
I want to meet him! :) Can you introduce me to him!! :p
mangosalado 3 years ago
cool
FuckYourAssIdiot 3 years ago 2
tehy should have rebuilt it instead of selling the metal scraps
stephenharperbest2 3 years ago
should've kept it as a landmark
Hquidditchfan 3 years ago
yeah that would be great aswell
stephenharperbest2 3 years ago
Hear ya
Hquidditchfan 3 years ago
i Belive they have one in Branson Missouri
YoshiFan501 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my home state! :]
TheStemi4ever 2 years ago
@TheStemi4ever me to! ive only been there once though.
YoshiFan501 1 year ago
it doesnt have any sound
where i can heard it in sound??
gameonline13 3 years ago
READ!!!!!!!
Rod Serling (of the Twilight Zone)knew that the Lusitania was a much more important sip than the Titanic and he wrote a TZ ep where a man travels back in time to try to stop the Lusitania from getting torpedoed (an act which brought the US into World War One where as the T