RENE LEVESQUE 1968 PRESS CONFERENCE

[MrPopop100]

whoooooooooo gives your typical white man with no regard to any1 but whites

[skyscraper03]

On the contrast, Shanghai in China speaks Mandarin. That city has history of speaking Shanghainese(pop. about 100million) for thousands of years. Quebec is speaking French only for like 400 years? However, it is now proudly speaking Mandarin(which used to be the northern language in China), and greatly understood, loved and supported by the rest of China, now. This Shining City of "all of China" will even surpass the mighty NYC in near future. This, I would say, is the true Win-Win.

[skyscraper03]

in exchange of keeping the French Language, Montreal has completely fallen, and it's like a beautiful version of Detroit. Population won't grow because immigrants really want to speak more English for their own benefits, since it's the attractive international language. I don't know why the language was so important that they could lose everything for. Do people become dogs when they suddenly speak English? Do communications go any different or worse when you speak in English?

[BARCACROSSESTHEALPS]

@skyscraper03 The language of imperialism often becomes the the lingua de jour...

[skyscraper03]

I might have to study more on his achievement and so on. However, if the direction he was heading to was separation from Canada than making the lives of Quebecers better and their rights more understood, Rene Levesque was probably the "waste of energy": A great energy try to attempt something that is against what there is, thus wasted that great amount of energy in himself as well as the same amount of energy on the other side. Means "Lose-Lose" situation for Canada, the opposite of Win-Win.

[antuerius]

I don't believe Separatism is phoney for one second. Vive le Québec libre!

As a political movement, is at its least, one political force in Canada that might reign in the current renegade PM. He and his interloper Upper Canada spirit rapper cronies ravaging the continent with environmentally backward industries, fiat capital globalism, military technology racketeering and indeed Western Separatist tendencies. Habeas Corpus for sure: Occupy Ottawa.

[Hadogei123456789]

What a great man.

[crazyforcanada]

@Hadogei123456789 - Another fool is fooled. He was a conman; the 1980 ballot was a demand to force ALL of Canada into an EEC-EU style marxist constitution. That's not 'secession'. Even the chief justice of the Supreme Court admits on film that Quebec was NOT 'seceding' in 1980. Levesque he worked IN propaganda in WWII for the USA & London. He nearly propagandized Canada into its grave... because people don't listen, don't read, don't think, they just act on their inflated egos.

[crazyforcanada]

@b2mnaq53 - "Making videos of René Levesque , not resoecting him and dirtying his name is very provovative" - are you willfully blind or just stupid? I didn't "make the video" of Levesque, it's existing footage from 1968 which I translated into English. It contains only HIS OWN WORDS. Evidently, you need to read something extra into it AS being "provocative" so you have an excuse to abuse & threaten someone you think is "you english". Take your sick agenda off my page, or I'll block you.

[crazyforcanada]

@b2mnaq53 - "you english" ?? You're an ignoramus. My father's French Canadian. You're also a totalitarian who likes to control other peoples' thought and opinion by threatening them expressly or impliedly. As for Levesque, you don't know your history, you have memorized propaganda, and EVERY generation has the right to verify ALL the alleged facts for itself, including the fact that Levesque was TRICKING French Canadians into voting away their sovereignty for a world government.

[crazyforcanada]

@b2mnaq53 - Quebecers are brainwashed so they can't see that in 1980 the ballot question was NOT to secede; it sought a "MANDATE TO NEGOTIATE" a NEW FORM OF GOVERNMENT for ALL OF CANADA and ALL THE PROVINCES. This is not "secession"; it is the transplant of the European Economic Community-EU onto ALL of Canada. It is an OVERTHROW of Canada; "secession" is when part of the territory leaves under leadership of a COUP; secession is not the OVERTHROW of the country it's leaving.

[crazyforcanada]

@b2mnaq53 - The EEC-EU system is the basis of a world government; the video REAL FACE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION explains that UK in the EEC-EU has lost 100% of its powers to legislate in major subject areas. Those powers were transferred to an UNELECTED bureaucracy in Brussels, the people have lost 100% control. Uncontrolled migration in the EEC-EU is eradicating ancient nations by wiping out the people on their own soil. All this will happen to Quebec if it pretends to "secede" into that system.

[crazyforcanada]

@b2mnaq53 - Moreover, many observers warn the EEC-EU is the basis of a new Soviet system: Vladimir Bukovsky, Vilius Brazenas, Charlotte Iserbyt. LEVESQUE was a communist, his father raised him as one. For him, the word "community" meant "communism". He wanted Canada to adopt the EEC system and be called "The Canadian Community". His autobiography contains a chapter, JE SUIS FEDERALISTE in which he reveals his REAL "dream" is WORLD FEDERALISM, i.e., world government. That is a COMMUNIST goal.

[crazyforcanada]

@b2mnaq53 - The communist parentage of the so-called Quebec "secession" movement is being documented. I've been translating French articles on this into English. I give the French titles at the outset, so you can track them down online easily. To find these articles, look for my blogspot "Jack and Gilles went up the hill" also titled: "Jack Layton, NDP, and Marxist World Government " for these translations. Lester Pearson was a SOVIET agent, he recruited TRUDEAU etc. to launch this.

[Jpjazzy]

Ce genre de commentaire me rappelle à chaque fois les raisons pour lesquelles je suis souverainiste!

This kind of comment help me to remember why the separation of those two beautiful nations is essential and must happen ASAP. Cheers for your help mate!

[crazyforcanada]

@Jpjazzy - it's not two nations. That's an old con from the Pearson era. Nfld. was here 4 years before Quebec City was founded. All the provinces are culturally unique. Language isn't the only factor in determining who people are. Canada is a confederation of many provinces, not a confederation of two -- which was upper and lower Canada at one time. The nation is much broader than that, my friend. And it all nonetheless belongs to all of us. I don't plan to give up an inch of it!

[Jpjazzy]

@crazyforcanada I hope all the provinces will realize that they deserve the auto-determination of themselves in that case! But I don't see much cultural and political differences between Alberta and Saskatchewan like between Québec and the ROC. A nation is a society with common culture, common memory, common language with a government. We just don't have the same interest as we saw in the last elections or in Copenhagen or any international meeting. I want to contribute by myself to the world!..

[crazyforcanada]

@Jpjazzy - You should read the 1865 Debates on Confederation, it might open your eyes to more than the immense view in your binocular navel.

[XBillums]

This uploader is an idiot. Levesque was a great man who did great things for Quebec. There is no Power Corporation or whatever you called it. You probably also believe that man has never walked on the moon and there are aliens running the White House.

[SortilegeMETAL80]

Je suis pour la séparation n'importe quand !

[zobielamouche1]

thumbs up for levesque, thumbs down for the uploader because of his comments

[maymonk]

Seperation from Canada does not necessarily mean that Quebec will be entirely cut off from the entire country. They want soverignty and economic independence, to be able to take orders from a Quebec government and not the one in Ottawa. Do you blame them?Untill the advent of mega-constitutional politics they were not treated as equals. If they hadnt pushed the way that they did, the Meech Accord and Charlottetown Accord(although failures) would never have been brought about.

[maymonk]

Quebec has legitimate reasons for wanting seperation. Quebec was originally a French colony, unlike the rest of Canada. They agreed to join Canada with the Confederation agreement, yet they were not given acknowledgement as a distinct society. Ok, there are two langauges in Canada but they did not have to be a part of Canada if they did not want to. If Canada were smart, they would make Quebecois people really feel like they are a part of Canada.

[zobielamouche1]

@maymonk the whole east of canada was part of french colonies, and even in the hudson bay (baie du nord) area the french exercised influence

[lulzwhot]

Look at newfoundland. newfoundland is just as different from the rest of canada as australia is. but they dont whine and complain.

[Ouananish1]

@lulzwhot NFL as different as australia is... two english colonies... can u consider we have been conquered and that its a painful feeling to be like strangers in our own country... after conquest the only ones who stayed here were poor farmers and priest. Business and commerce was an «English-speaker only» sector for decades, even centuries in some cases... English r opressing the french, and both r opressing the first nations...

[lulzwhot]

@Ouananish1

cry more we're in the 21st century, i have just as much respect for quebec as i do for any other province, you're are making up your enemies.

de tout facon, plusieur quebecois que je me parle a dis qu'il pense que l'idée de la souvrainété de quebec est fou, et que la bloc quebecois et la parti quebecois sont des institution pour une temp long passé... et si la quebec départ de canada nous somme collé avec ontario comme la seule pôle de politic canadien.

[micf2302]

Yet, you will agree that the federation drifted to a centralized system, because the taxation powers were given according to the reality of that time period. This helped the federal government, impose itself in sphere of provincial jurisdiction, like education or health, over time. While the provincial government slowly lost their power. If you are for a real federal system, then the separatist are your best friends. You shouldn't sully Lévesque's name because that was is goal, real federalism.

[micf2302]

Your right, Trudeau and Lévesque were internationalists. However, the 1980 question was never meant as a first stage in a ''N.A.U.'' You have to understand, these men lived with the horrors of WWII. Insuring such atrocities didn't reproduce was a driving factor behind both of these men political views (more so for Trudeau). Such consideration led to René's internationalism and Trudeau's inclusion of the bill of rights in the Constitution and refusal to acknowledge the french as a nation in Canad

[crazyforcanada]

@micf2302 - "refusal to acknowledge...as a nation" -- listen carefully. [1] The CONFEDERATION of 1867 was a federal system specifically because ALL the federating provinces were DISTINCT, Quebec was not the only one. They all wanted to remain distinct. FEDERALISM is the pure 100% embodiment of "distinct" society for each and all the provinces, including Quebec. [2] Quebec "signed" the 72 Resolutions AT QUEBEC CITY only 1864 agreeing to ONE nation of Canada with DISTINCT provinces.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - the term NATION has numerous meanings; the NATIONS of Ireland, England, Scotland and French Canada are embodied in the PEOPLES who largely populated each of the founding colonies of Canada. Quebec is not "a" nation versus the "other" nation of the English-speaking! It's ONE province devoted to the "race" of French-Canadians, just as the other provinces were each devoted to the majority "race" populating each of those at Confederation.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - it is extremely abusive of any French-Quebecer to pretend the REST of the DISTINCT peoples of this country DON'T EXIST, by merging us all together in a lump as English-SPEAKING. If a Tamil or an Iraqi came to Quebec and spoke French, would he be a member of your French-Canadian "nation"? No, I don't think so. That was not the purpose of Con-FEDERA-tion. It was specifically to protect several "national" "races" by giving each a province, & all ONE shared political nationality.

[Ouananish1]

@crazyforcanada sure they would be member of our nation... its not about where we're from but its about where we r going together... we have been conquered but english canada is too blind to realize that the queen is a symbol of domination for us, the symbol of our defeat and our subordination... first generation of immigrants didnt know about us, but their children learn history in our school and start to feel they r more quebecers than canadians

[1curieux]

@crazyforcanada Of the "Patriotes" arrested in Lower Canada in 1837-39 you find names like Thomas Anderson, Alexander Ashley and other unlikely French names in those days. So could a Tamil or Iraqi be considered Quebecois by separatists? Of course. Hard core separatists like Pierre Falardeau have always said: "I don't care for your last name or the colour of your skin, I just want to know if you are with me." Though some are stupid enough to hate English people, most separatists don't.

[micf2302]

Oh and by the way, I would like to know when did Quebec sign the constitution? How can you claim that René is breaking something that Quebec never signed? Just like it refused to fight for Independence with the thirteen colonies or it refused to separate in 95. This province's identity has been shaken by pass political events. But this gave birth to one of the most interesting open, free and understanding culture I know of, which doesn't need to sully people's name to feel good about itself.

[crazyforcanada]

@micf2302 - the so-called patriation was illegal, the Charter & amending formula both alter federal and provincial powers, which is forbidden by s. 7(3) of the Statute of Westminster, 1931 -- one of our Constitutional documents. The illegality was never challenged in a COURT of LAW. The supreme court judges, sitting in their "Special Jurisdiction" known as the 'advisory function' are not acting judicially when they issue OPINIONS on legality. The false patriation needs a real COURT challenge.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - i.e., the patriation being ILLEGAL under s. 7(3) of a Constitutional document, it can't be MADE LEGAL by anyone SIGNING it or made ILLEGAL by anyone NOT signing it. It needs to be thrown out IN COURT. If people weren't totally ignorant, this would have been done long ago, but there are also some people who, neurotically, like to perpetuate excuses to complain and fight. And the politicians love this, they live off it.

[crazyforcanada]

@micf2302 - the "province's identity" is being shaped & shaken by sedition, & by keeping the people ignorant. It's being shaken by Power Corporation & the multinationals which own the press and media, and by frauds like Trudeau, Levesque, Chretien, Parizeau, Harper and Duceppe, who are all on the same side: creating faked disputes to divide us so they can dissolve Canada for North American Union -- a new "federation" of over 100 Mexican, US, & former canadian provinces.

[micf2302]

@CrazyforCanada:

I'm a Quebecer who currently live outside Quebec, in Canada. People like you are what always makes me hope that Quebec will separate, the funny thing is that I am actually against separatism. Your whole text is full of bull crap... But the simple fact of dirtying the name of such a great man is clearly just being an asshole and trying to rub it to our face. Do you have the slightest idea what this man achieved? Learn history, facts not your plot fiction!

[micf2302]

For the rest of your Bull crap:

René Lévesque and Trudeau had there opposition about how to ''save'' Quebec LONG before René ever touched politics. If you go back further enough you'll see that this opposition is present in their University years...

How would POWERCORP, a privately owned, for profit organisation company be the central planner in the birth of :''a communist world government''?

Please, try to give your plot theory an once of common sense!

[crazyforcanada]

The fascists always use "legitimacy" to break the law when they don't like the law. The fact is there was & is no POWER under s. 92 of the BNA Act, 1867 for any province to secede because the Constitution was designed to prevent secession & deny the power for the safety of ALL citizens of Canada, who would be exposed to (i) civil war & (ii) annexation to the USA after being stripped of all their constitutional protections & safeguards, including international recognition that they are a nation.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - Confederation is not a one-sided deal that one can pull out with reckless unconcern for the wellbeing of everyone else. In addition, the French Canadians themselves have USED Confederation to PROTECT their own existence, otherwise they'd have been submerged in the American melting pot and speaking English today with a Yankee accent. It takes a lot of NERVE and CONTEMPT for fellow citizens to use them as a CUSHION for 150 years only to then tell them to go to hell.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - And in any event, if you read the 1980 referendum question CAREFULLY, Levesque was not seeking INDEPENDENCE, he was seeking a mandate to negotiate the EEC system to be IMPOSED ON ALL OF CANADA. The EEC system developed into the EU system; the North American Union is the EU system being imposed on Canada, the USA and Mexico. The "Sovereignty Association" of 1980 and the "Sovereignty Partnership" of 1995 were two prior stages of North American Union, NOT of Quebec independence.

[lpsmash]

When I think that 2milions people vote for the yes in 1995, I think it not treason bu legitimate

[ddeo]

dude you are crazy

[diogene4994]

If you call anyone asking for change a traitor then for "God's sake", might as well just watch our world destroy itself.

Believing all this bullshit is like believing World Trade Center was cause by the US government. It's complete bullshit, it's nothing more than theory and very far from the actual facts.

[crazyforcanada]

@diogene4994 - It's extraordinary how you can look directly at the FACTS in front of your face (presuming you bothered to VIEW this video before posting) and STILL deny that Levesque is openly stating his goal is to replace Confederation with a new system. That system according to his 1979 white paper is the EEC-EU system, which is being planted on all continents to make the whole world THE SAME, under a one-world government. WAKE UP !!!!

[ju519]

Even today, that guy has the strengh to push his nation to its independance !

[Baargeld]

This is such narrow rhetorics. Sure, Power Corp had a part in Levesque founding his party, but calling it phoney, that's just poorly thought. Consider the vote for the PQ in 76 and 95: still think that more than half of Quebec is phoney? C'mon...

CrazyforCanada, the name says it all. One way thinking.

[pequisto]

Go smoke another Rene. Classy.

[Hellsfox674]

Si je comprend bien, il/elle est en train d'accuser le 3/4 des politiciens de la scène fédérale américaine, ainsi que canadienne, en plus de ceux originaires de la province de Québec, qu'ils soient fédéralistes ou souverainistes (lâche-moi la trahison pis le ''séparatisme''), de formenter un complot de niveau international destiné à imposer un gouvernement mondial communiste par des moyens subversifs... On croirait entendre les 'conspiracy theories' ; c'est tiré par les cheveux

[2crazyforcanada]

Je laisse vous répondre John F. Hylan: «La véritable menace pour notre république est le gouvernement invisible, qui comme une pieuvre géante, étends ses tentacules gluants autour de nos villes, états et nations.

[2crazyforcanada]

Hylan continue... À la tête de ce pieuvre sont les intérêts Rockefeller/Standard Oil et un petit groupe de puissants bancaires généralement dénommé banquiers internationaux [qui] à toutes fins pratiques contrôlent le gouvernement des États-Unis pour leurs propres fins égoïstes.» -27 mars 1922, NY Times.

[2crazyforcanada]

Le Council on Foreign Relations existe depuis 1921, et sa petite soeur le groupe de Bilderberg depuis 1954. La fonction principale de cette dernière est de voir à lindoctrination des personnes choisies par les membres de ces deux groupes (et par la commission Trilatéral) selon lagenda établit par ce réseau.

[2crazyforcanada]

Alors, il arrive que tous nos principaux premiers ministres depuis 1954 font partie du Bilderberg, incluant Lester Pearson, Pierre Trudeau, Jean Chrétien, Brian Mulroney, Stephen Harper, pas pour oublié dautres personnes clées telles Stéphane Dion.

[2crazyforcanada]

Il faut être naïf pour croire que les plus riches du monde ne tentent pas de s'organiser pour assurer leur propre contrôle sur tous les aspects de la vie susceptible de nuire à leurs affaires... y incluant les lois édictées par nos élus pour assurer un salaire minimum, conditions de travail décentes, lois contre la pollution, lois contre les cartels etc., etc. Il est naturel donc que ces gens-là essaient d'influencer nos gouvernements par le lobbying, par exemple.

[2crazyforcanada]

Mais, encore plus simple pour eux de choisir, d'entraîner et de promouvoir leurs propres candidats préférés puis de financer leurs campagnes électorales, puis de les appuyer depuis les médias et les journaux dont ils sont les propriétaires où les rédacteurs eux aussi sont choisis selon les intérêts et les idées des propriétaires.

[2crazyforcanada]

Après quelques décennies en fait, presque 100 ans maintenant - de ce genre de pratique, nos gouvernements sont à toutes fins pratiques contrôlés par les plus riches pour leurs propres fins. Ce nest pas un 'conspiracy theory', cest la vie ordinaire pour les plus riches de la planète, fait que nous ignornons à notre propre péril.

Kathleen Moore

crazyforcanada

[pequisto]

The problem with Levesque is that he is a drunk driving murderer

[Simboiss]

At least, Lévesque killed one guy...

Compare this to George W. Bush (or any other American president), responsible for the death of millions of people around the world...

[pequisto]

Yeah, he killed one guy. If he were in a position to kill more, he would have...

[Simboiss]

Pfwahahaha!

[veritasEtjusticia]

The problem with Levesque is that he assumed the best of English Canada. He thought that if he showed himself to be reasonable and willing to talk that there would be someone else similar at the other end. He was, of course, completely wrong. The other end contained nothing but racist hatred and intransigence. He should have known better but his idealism proved to be a dead end.

No more association and friendship crap... INDEPENDENCE NOW!!!

[crazyforcanada]

Sorry to disappoint you, but Levesque in this video is not planning the independence of Quebec, he's planning to REPLACE CONFEDERATION with a new "federal" system. Hindsight indicates that his "federal system" was the EEC/EU (European Union), based on the Soviet Union, and constituting the template for a world federation under global government. "Secession" was a SCAM to get North American Union, coming cold-turkey anyway for 2010. See habeascorpuscanada[dot]com GROUNDS page!

[MathieuHB]

@veritasEtjusticia Je suis aps sure si vous comprenez bien le français, mais vous avez totalement tort. Vous ne connaissez aucun engagement de Lesvesque. Il est sans doute le plus grand démocrate que l'histoire du Canada est connu. Il croyait en l'intelligence du peuple d'où la nécessité du référendum. EN aucun cas, sa pensée est radicale, d'ailleurs il est drôle que vous utiliser le mot association parce que lui même son projet se nomme la souveraineté-association...

[veritasEtjusticia]

@MathieuHB Mathieu, je ne suis pas sure si tu comprends bien l'anglais... Mais je ne disais pas que Lévesque était trop radicale, au contraire, je pense qu'il ne l'était pas assez. Il avait trop confiance en la bonne volonté du Canada anglais. Je pense qu'il a appris sa leçon avec la Nuit des longs couteaux...

[legueu]

Felicitation pour l'excellente traduction. Les commentaires on s'en passerais, mais je comprend que tu ai tes propres opinions.

[crazyforcanada]

3. The CAP's pushing a "fight" for Canada deceives Canadians by diverting them away from s. 52 of the Constitution which protects the Constitution, it's an entrenching clause which raises the Constitution above all other laws and actions. The concept is well known in law. By attracting good Canadians and pointing them in the wrong direction, they buy time for the final Communist-globalist takedown. Some good people have been swept up into the CAP, but the CAP is mostly sinister.

[sagafire]

Désolé, mais René Lévesque ne voulait que le bien des Québécois, et jamais ils n'aurais accepter nous foutre dans le NAU, jamais.

[crazyforcanada]

Desolée mais pour lui le «bien» des québécois serait le système communiste sans nations sous un gouvernement mondial. Faut lire son autobiographie de 1986, Attendez que je me rappelle, dans son chapitre Nos Apocalypses, à la section «Je suis fédéraliste» où il explique deux choses: (a) l'état-nation a vu son jour; et

[crazyforcanada]

(b) son projet rêve serait le fédéralisme mondial et un «Conseil de sécurité pour l'humanité tout entier» à qui les nations devraient céder leur souveraineté sur leur propres ressources. C'est exactement la même chose qu'on voit en septembre 2007 quand Sarkozy, employant le même langage, invoque un Nouvel Order Mondial, un gouvernement global.

[crazyforcanada]

Le langage est tellement similaire qu'on doit en conclure qu'ils font partie du même club des mondialisateurs qui dure depuis longtemps. Sarkozy appelle le Nouvel Ordre Mondial un «new deal» comme bien d'autres politicien(ne)s actuellement qui demandent pour un gouvernement mondial. Lévesque, en 1979 (au pouvoir) émet son «livre blanc» sur «Souveraineté Association» du Québec avec le reste du Canada. La version anglaise s'intitule «A New Deal».

[crazyforcanada]

«Souveraineté Association» remplacerait la Conféderation par le système EEC/EU voulu par Charles de Gaulle pour toutes les provinces du Canada: «états associés». C'est ce système à la base du fédéralisme mondiale, déjà imposé sur la plupart des continents: Union sud-Américaine, Union Africaine, Union Asiatique, et prochainement Union nord-Américaine qui éliminera le Canada comme nation d'ici 2010, et même comme nom sur la carte.

[crazyforcanada]

Ce processus reflète le plan de Josef Stalin qu'il a énoncé en 1936 afin de rendre toute la planète communiste par étapes en fusionnant les nations ensemble, puis en fusionnant les continents ensemble sous un gouvernement mondial. Les Nation Unies fut fondée précisemment pour en devenir le gouvernement global, ou au moins sa façade. Même son logo est communiste.

[crazyforcanada]

Ulltimement, les nations perdront toute leur souveraineté. Sous les communistes, les notions de «nation» politique et de «nation» raciale doivent être supprimé. On voit ici au Canada les débuts de cette suppression par voie d'immigration et le concept de «multi-culturalisme,» contraire au concept des provinces constitutionnelles.

[ispyonu20]

just english please!! thank you!! this is english-speaking Canada!

[2crazyforcanada]

When you say "this," what are you referring to? Canada has two founding languages, both protected in the British North America Act, 1867, and on top of it, we all have freedom of expression. I just answered the fellow above in French because I'm Canadian, and therefore, I'm bilingual. Do you read French? If not, you have no idea the amazing other world of ideas that you are missing out on.

[ispyonu20]

first of all, Im not missing out anything! je peux parle français, anglais & spanol...  merci... salut...

[ispyonu20]

I forgot to tell you that I'm trilingual / J'ai oublié de vous dire que je suis trilingue / Yo olvide decirte que soy trilingue..... Thank You / Merci / Gracias

[2crazyforcanada]

Nice to be trilingual. However, the issue is this: on what basis do you presume to tell other commenters at my video channel to use only English in Canada? French and English are our languages, the heritage belongs to us all, because we all share this nation. We should all be proud of both languages and nurture and promote each other, not bicker and fight.

-- Kathleen Moore, Habeas Corpus Canada

[ispyonu20]

hi, ok.. well I think you're right! Sorry for commenting like that! You should be pround of having two official languages here in Canada!... u take care... thanks, merci, gracias.

[peanut2587]

The problem is, this is all theoretical. In reality, try to get served in French almost ANYWHERE outside Quebec and you will get «Sorry, i dont speak French» as your answer. We already are two countries in practice.

[Jpjazzy]

@peanut2587 why don't we make it official... Just the be honest with ourselves...

[peanut2587]

@Jpjazzy i wish we did jazzy, i wish we did.

[peanut2587]

refreshing to see someone acknowledging. If ionly there were more like this on Parliament Hill, and in general.

[metalways]

continued from Cap, are sincere and fighting for Canada. I am unsure about the new leader. I used to get updates in my e-mail as to what is happening in the world, almost daily when Connie Fogal was the leader, I have'nt received anything for awhile. That last post was my second, but showed up before my first, maybe that's why there was some confusion. Take care.

[crazyforcanada]

1. Canada doesn't need to be "fought" for with placards and protests and petitions and referendums. The Constitution Act, 1982 contains a supremacy clause at s. 52. The legal effect comes from both its English and French versions. All acts of government contrary to the existing Constitution are null and void, you just have to go to Court to invoke the nullity. Fogal was a lawyer who knew that. The new leader is a nut who thinks he's the King of the New World Order.

[crazyforcanada]

2. The CAP executive, including founder Paul Hellyer, believe in world government in an interplanetary federation where the Earth's real name is Urantia. They are spinoffs from the same 7th-Day Adventists that spun off David Koresh's Branch Davidians, famous for their final end in a bloody FBI siege in 1993 at Waco,Texas. Am working on a CAP spoof site, here: ( brightpathway [dot] webng [dot] com [ / ] c-sap ) -- the text in the scrollers is 100% from CAP executives' Urantia belief system.

[metalways]

being quietly merged into a North American Union, is beyond ridiculous, Quebec's fate will be no different than the rest of Canada.

[metalways]

or others like it. Instead you should look into this yourselves, try to disprove it if you wish. It is well documented and irrefutable. To the person who thinks an EU style government in Canada is a good idea, you are either ill-informed, or an idiot. The people of Europe are continually voting down more integration(it goes ahead anyway), while looking for ways to take back more of their independence from the decision makers in Brussels. Quebec surviving as an independent entity while Canada is

[crazyforcanada]

Levesque's autobiography is this:

Attendez Que Je Me Rappelle, Rene Levesque, January 1986 ISBN-10: 2890372944 ISBN-13: 9782890372948, publisher: Quebec/Amerique. I got mine at the library. Levesque, in the section Je Suis Federaliste, is using in-group language used by other pro-one-worlders, such as SARKOZY who in September 1997 called for a one-world government under the UN. Find that speech online and compare to Levesque in this section. SAME group. One-worlders.

[crazyforcanada]

Soldiers from Quebec are dying in Afghanistan right now because they are being exploited to build the one-world government. Levesque was a supporter of one-world government, see his AUTOBIOGRAPHY from 1986, Chapter "Nos Apocalypses" and section "Je Suis Federaliste". He supports WORLD FEDERALISM, which is just what the EU is working on now, it's the template for world government. FIRST make every continent the SAME, THEN impose one-world government.

[crazyforcanada]

The nations of the EU are down to 18% sovereignty or less, by now. They do not CHOOSE. Moreover, the LISBON Treaty, being forced on them all, is to place military control for ALL those former nations, into the hands of the EU. That's a heck of a lot of troops controlled by ONE non-elected body. They will do as they are TOLD, they will not CHOOSE.

[LaMouleQuiCoule]

great man, the whole argument of treason is non sense, its not treason but evolution, self aweakening

[crazyforcanada]

What has 'evolution' and 'self-awakening' got to do with being lied to by a phoney separatist? He is not awakening anybody, he is LYING to everyone, and to French-Canadians in particular, that they will have an independent French state in North America... when in fact he was planning to eliminate both Quebec and Canada under an EU-style one-world government. He's a LIAR, not a hero. If his aims were so great, why didn't he TELL THE TRUTH instead of manipulating people to destroy themselves?

[LaMouleQuiCoule]

Your 'craziness for canada' render you blind and frankly quite ignorant.

Your whole argument is based on the 'fact' that he secretly wanted to eliminate both Quebec and Canada...which is non sense

And if you ask me a EU style gov on Canada would be a great idea, the provinces would be able to choose for themselves! For instance, soldiers from Qc wouldn't be dying in Afghanistan right now uselessly under Canada's command

[2crazyforcanada]

You don't understand the EU, the primary complaint of member states is their loss of sovereignty over basics like fishing, agriculture, natural resources. They have less choice, not more. In addition, the EU is being spawned around the globe precisely to merge all the "EU's" together under a one-world fascist government. The goal is to eliminate the NATIONS.

[2crazyforcanada]

Wake up to being hujacked into North American Union. The ONLY reason for the phony Parti Quebecois, created as a strategy of Power Corporation in a secret committee including Trudeau, was to impose the EEC-European Union system in place of the Confederation of Canada. The only way to do that was to FAKE a separatist "awakening" in order to use the separatists as a TOOL to break the Constitution so as to nullify it and replace it. We have a communist world union coming, not an independent Quebec.

[peanut2587]

ok you obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Live in your dreams, we are no dupes. And why would it be in the interest of Power Corp to have a europeen-style union?! Canada, let me remember you, was originally designed as a confederation. Federal Prime ministers have hijacked the nature of this kind of Power division. And that is why, amongst other things, that some Quebecers want independance.

[0Panchovilla0]

Well CrazyforCanada, here is my comment.

The ''phoney'' party is still alive after 40 years, making a child at the federal level in the process. This is called democracy, this is putting forward collective aspirations and ideas. ''L'air du temps'', the energy and the challenges from that period (video from 1968) migth be lost but the ideas and aspirations that the Parti Quebecois carried will remains and in time , I hope, will bring a new, positive change in Canada.

[ArthuroQC]

2 nouveaux pays pour l'amerique rien de moin sinon sa ne pourra jamais marcher.

[crazyforcanada]

Ca ne pourra jamais marcher pourquoi ?