Added: 5 years ago
From: Buddha7575
Views: 554,361
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,016)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Instead of going into a flame war about "who is better" lets just remember that Britain and the USA are the greatest/strongest allies in all the world. Its a bond that will never be broken, we will always fight beside each other, shoulder to shoulder, heading into the fight.

  • is it avalible on netflix?

  • @jaydean1505

    I'm an American and totally believe that.

  • tony montana would have took them all.

  • SAS=Stupid Ass Slags! GO NAVY!!!

  • S.A.S best special force in world

  • They did not do a good job in Nigeria raid.@jaydean1505 

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Hell of a way to run a firefight !

  • this movie was pretty bad ass. 

  • lol the Scottish bloke is the best.....MOVE YER ARSE!

  • Song?

  • thumbs up those of you who watched ultimate force

  • @nickgandy3 great series

  • 5.44 LOL

  • This is one of the worst reenactments I've seen of SAS. They run and look like pansies trying not to break their nails. You wanna see a real raid? Watch Operation Nimrod, the 1980 Iranian Embassy Siege.

  • Class class class !

  • Slowing down a little , Peter? Come on man, move your a**e !!

    (The great and under-appreciated Maurice Roeves)

  • when you see those choppers coming YOU KNOW YOUR F***kED HAHAHA.

  • The SAS are people Chuck Norris chose to be just like him.

  • 76 dislikes are humans with prawn brains. Best SAS movie ever made. How can one don't like this movie???? 

  • @cwmak70 Hmm... maybe they prefer watching bestiality porn with a vampire and a werewolf.

  • @altairx26 LOL... Well said. Gotta love your sense of humor.

  • @zjapp you do realise that the SAS existed before call of duty...

  • sas=stupid armed spastics, everybody knows that!

  • @Conoria dude, they've been proven to be the most elite special forces group in the world, so go fuck urself u jealous fuckface

  • yust like in MW3 SAS Says: " Who dares wins "

  • @zjapp who dares wins is the motto for the S.A.S. I think, thats why it's in cod :L

  • The SAS really are the best in the world! They are the ultimate blueprint that other countries emulate and copy. The SAS invented the infamous 'killing house' a building where live rounds are mandatory where they train in room clearing, etc, even America made an exact copy of it (fact!), however, most of the SAS work goes completely unnoticed as they are masters at recon.

  • SAS = Super Awesome Soldiers

  • The British SAS are bad ass! Gotta love the Brits! They always have our backs! ;)

  • Btw SAS means special air service...

  • I love these keyboard warriors who think they're veterans. Sas is like the a special forces swat team. To say there plain the best makes no sence because some things are not there job. Us special forces, delta is a unit for undercover slow missons that can take months, whil a unit like sas is for quick, building clearing stuff. Maybe there best at that, but units have there jobs. Room clear,air,demo etc

  • @TeyCallMeBigMac Think again. Like the SAS, hostage rescue and direct action are two mission types of many Delta can handle. Delta was patterned after the SAS even down to their organizational breakdown: wings, squadrons, troops, etc. Delta's first mission, Operation Eagle Claw was a no-go due to transportation issues getting them to the target (the US embassy grounds in Teheran). Both SAS and Delta recruit from any service branch, have female operatives, and exchange personnel regularly.

  • @infectedvector Thank you.

  • @Coleybears1 No problem. Always glad to help. What did I do? lol

  • @infectedvector Said something right.

  • @TeyCallMeBigMac gobshite if you know what i mean [int means int tit ]

    

  • @TeyCallMeBigMac dude, th SAS do many jobs, such as going undercover for weeks, sometimes even monthes on end. They dont only do quick ops.

  • It's like counter strike moment.

  • para cuando esta peli en castellano....porfa.

  • the amount the masks restrict the camera is stupid, its nothing like that.

  • 4:38 - 4:43...door fail...shotgun shoots two hinges on the left of the door, but when the other SAS kicks the door, the door hinges are on the right instead of the left...FAIL

  • @Coak5 you really spend your time watching videos over and over until you find the tiniest mistake....FAIL

  • @bfg1996 and you spend your time reading comments that don't matter to you....FAIL

  • @Coak5 Actually i just read comments, thats kinda what theyre there for

  • @bfg1996 Just stop son....stop....admit you failed...I admit I waste my time reading useless comments and noticing errors in videos but I don't go around trying to bash on people like you..

  • @Coak5 i didnt fail at all. i clearly just got you to admit you wasted your time looking for stupid tiny mistakes...WIN

  • @bfg1996 obviously you say the same thing to keep the argument going when you know you lost already..I've ended mine already but if you wish to have the last word then go for it...I'll always have the last laugh...

  • @Coak5 Whatever dude. I was never trying to be a douche i just thought you were trying to talk shit about this movie which to me looks pretty cool.

  • @bfg1996 not talking shit about this movie. Just noting a mistake they made for such a bad ass movie. That's all.

  • love this movie brave guys xx god bless all of them x

  • SAS = Speed Aggression Surprise

  • @dykesy30 i thought it ment special air Service

  • @gamemaker1234 It does, but several members of the SAS (including Snapper) have been quoted as saying that there's a saying in the regiment that SAS actually stands for Speed Aggression and Surprise.

  • I ALWAYS GET GOOS BUMPS WHEN THE MUSIC STARTS AT THIS PART OF THE FILM

  • SAS speiciel Air Service

  • Don't fuck with SAS.

  • fake

  • @slipperdship of course its fake. but the real life version is more dramatic for sure. 

  • what the hell kind of name is soap eh price ?

  • wtf counter strike lol

  • 5:10 "Surprise!"

  • MW3 WHO DARES WINS

  • Peter is an unites states air force senior Airmen? And an officer is a bad guy? I don't get it.

  • ehm uk rules

  • 5:42 Hello-Goodbye!

  • SAS for the win

  • ON ME BOYS! best line ever

  • Lewis Collins in Who Dares Wins PAWNS Ross Kemps Ultimate Force. FACT!

  • LT. Kieran (FROST) Geary

    commander

    HAWK Squad

    3rd battalion SAS

  • (5:39) LIKE A BOSS!

  • Glad we are all conducting this in English. Speaks volumes.

  • 5:40 ROFL epic win

  • the sas are the best

    

  • @t1000eg cmon move your arse

  • Reminds me of my days as a Marine in the Special Operations Branch! Saw this on base back in 82.

  • 7:25

    That's why the SAS don't fuck around. Lol.

  • @dykesy30......I have read it and couldn´t agree more with your comments.....good man.

  • Comment removed

  • Studs!!!

  • whats the music ??

  • the film is great

  • i cannot wait to get this on blu-ray.

  • lol wtf

  • Is the white guy some kind of spy for the SAS?

  • @Superduperhog

    White guy? They all look quite white and British to me. Anyhow the civilian good guy is a disgraced SAS captain thrown out of the service and then joining a group of radicals for no particular reason. The said radical and lunatic ban-the-bomb sorts lefties then infiltrate a mansion crammed with high security American diplomats by pretending to be in a brass band. They held the diplomats hostage under pain of death unless Scotland gets nuked. Yep, the plot is that feeble.

  • @knutgordon When I meant the white guy, I mean white shirt guy who shot the terrorists. But thanks anyway.

  • @Superduperhog - He is an SAS trooper. The SAS frequently do under cover and do "spy" work.

  • @knutgordon Did you actually watch this film ? Cpt Peter Skellern (Lewis Collins) was not thrown out of the SAS it was all made to appear that way incase the terrorist checked him out (which they did) he was working under cover and had a contact on the outsidew who was reporting back to the SAS Colonel. Yes the story is fictiticous but it was made as a tribute to the real SAS who carried out the Irainian Embassy Operation in 1980, 2 years before this film was made

  • @quoaddict

    The film’s plot is very silly, banal and with holes-a-plenty. The politics, which feature heavily, are questionable and dangerously far right-wing at times. However, if you can push those elements aside, it is actually quite an enjoyable but guilty pleasure of a 80′s gung ho action flick made to quick cash on the real Embassy siege that made the the SAS famed outside the military establishment. If it was filmed today it would probably be called "seal team six"

  • SAS FTW

  • 5:07 Diversion attack!

  • Comment removed

  • Love it when they ask if he's OK and he says "Yeah, I'm starving"!

  • this is probably the most realistic about special forces...

  • 4:10 , 5:39 and 7:27 best tactical scenes!

  • i have a mod that is this for the game battlefield 1942\

  • british as hell:D

  • no body but nobody in the world fucks with the S A S

  • @djjimmyreplay unless american delta force and russian spetsnaz

  • @djkapalof ,they are good but the sas are the guvonors ,they help train the rest

  • @djkapalof - Why do people think that Spetznaz are even on the same level as thses guys?

    Spetznaz are not even in the same league.

  • oi! classic

  • igual que el ceop de jujuy jajaja

  • "Aerial observation." Heh. Idiots.

  • para cuando en castellano...PORFAVORRRRRRRRRR­R

  • @jimbo271uk.......good man jimbo !!

  • DAT SAS

  • I like the bit where the communists get owned.

  • @Scorpian472 great music

  • Capital of Ireland?]

    oh about £2.50 !

    Ireland needs the UK more than ever -nice one IRA

  • @Fartsurmonde Very true, ireland will always be ireland, same as wales is wales, scotland is scotland, there better off in the UK

  • @topmarkms yep shame there are people who are not bright enough to realise it though.

  • @Fartsurmonde @topmarkms A top economist said a couple of weeks ago that Scotland wouldn't be," that much better off " if it was independent, never the less , "that much better off" is better than worse off. Scotland can survive on it's own and won't go down the same route as Ireland due to the fact that Scotland has more Industry and produce. Mark my words though, when the oil is gone, England will be doing everything in it's power to bring about Scottish independence.

  • @MrScottJMiller Scotland will be a lot worse off if it leaves the union -whether it has oil or not -good example is the Baltic states Estonia Latvia and Lithuania -sure they are very proud of their independence but 1 in 7 of Estonia population is now in BRITAIN. Scotland will exist of course but like Estonia it is not big enough to have an economy that will survive on the world markets. Sure if they have control of the oil it may forestall the inevitable for a few years but in end it will lose.

  • @Fartsurmonde My point is that economists say that Scotland CAN survive but we aren't getting the option as England wants the control of the oil. When the oil is gone, Independence will be practically forced upon us. If Scotland was independent now we would have the option to withhold the funds as Norway does.Those are poor examples as they were already poor countries since before the collapse of the USSR. Scotland is a strong country and would be better of an independent in Europe than a Union.

  • @MrScottJMiller Sorry mate but you are believing in a fantasy.Scotland is far too small to have any capability to exist outside the union. Yes if it had the oil it will pay off or rather hold off debts & may even pay for welfare but the oil was never going to last. It is low grade oil as well. I do not know where you get the idea that "Scotland is a strong country" is this a quote from Mel Gibson? :) It is not a strong economy whiskey, remains of oil & fishing are far too small & uncompetive.

  • @Fartsurmonde I'm quoting a government analyst, you are quoting who exactly? Is this just coming form your own mind?Did you know we also have good tourism, meat trade, (not as good but still), crops, sell electricity,water, gas,build ships, electronics and computer games/programming industry, the biggest teaching hospitals in Europe, the top cancer research in the world.etc etc.We have much better trading and industry than those East European countries.Scotland would survive very well in the EU.

  • @MrScottJMiller -Whatever mate, whoever this "government analyst" you quote is, I believe he is talking a load of twaddle. (if he is in Salmond's ear that will probably explain it) Scotland will certainly be a nobody in the greater europe and it's small population will mean that it will have no clout at all.You might scrape a living of self sufficiency I would guess, (due to the population ) size)but other than that it will be no Mel Gibson movie existance lol.

  • Comment removed

  • @MrScottJMiller Believe who/what you want to believe mate -time will tell who was right.

  • @Fartsurmonde if the rest of the UK (inc BP) pulled everything out off scotland it would be third world. It has nothing to offer. If it wants the oil it would have to but the rights from the companies who researched and dug for it. They would also have to fund themselves....laughable at least.

  • @pedro1707 Well that's what I was trying to explain to MrScottJMiller but I think he must be a SNP leaflet postman for Mr Salmond lol.

  • @MrScottJMiller - I was told by a professor of economics that Scotlands economy would collapse after a few years of independance.

    All it really has is the North Sea oil, just like Norway, but Norway also has a small military export too. If Scotland had independance military expendature alone would probably use up all income from oil.

    You really must be either mad or completely ignorant as to how economics work to think Scotland would be better off without the UK.

  • @TomHartill When someone starts with insults you know they don't have the capacity to have a debate. "You really must be either mad or completely ignorant as to how economics work to think Scotland would be better off without the UK." Well that just proves you ignorance. You live in England,of course your going to believe that,England needs Scottish oil.England was on the verge of collapse when it was discovered in the 70's.You know that there is more oil in Scottish waters than Kuwait right?

  • @MrScottJMiller - Well I'm sorry if my comment offended you lol, I didn't mean to. I was just trying to make my point come across stronger.

    And no Scotland doesn't really have any exports other than oil - whisky and meat are completely insignificant compared to the oil export.

    What Scotish companies export military hardware?

    And no Scotland does not have a military force (not to my knowlege) - GB has a military, not Scotland.

  • @TomHartill The Scot's Guards were the oldest Military unit in the "British" army,now under the Royal Regiment of Scotland.So are you saying that if Scotland became independent the English government would keep all the Scottish troops and equipment? What exports does the rest of the UK have that is so different? For that matter, what does Norway have?Scotland builds ships and aircraft carriers for the Navy and sells electronics for military use.

  • @MrScottJMiller - Yes I know about such Scottish regiments withing the british army, this is the main reason why I would like to see Scotland stay as part of GB, I love history, and I love reading about old regiments like the Black Watch and the highlander regiments, it would be a shame to see them gone.

    I never said England would keep all the troops, don't really see where u got that from... and actually GB would keep all of the military equipment because it is ours to keep...

  • @MrScottJMiller ... continued... Scotland would obviously take all those Scotish soldiers away from the British army, but it would NEVER be able to employ all of them, further more Scotland would NEVER be able to afford to send any of it's soldiers to war, and so you would end up having a very large number of soldiers out of work.

    And just because there are factories and ports which manufacture millitary hardware in Scotland, does NOT mean that Scotland owns them...

  • Comment removed

  • @MrScottJMiller ...continued again... those companies are BRTISH not Scotish, if Scotland got independance those companies would either re-locate or remain where they are, the only benefit Scotland would get are the jobs those factories provied.

    You right about power tho, I didn't realise how big Scottish Power are.

    The money which comes from oil goes to British Petroleum, who I guess would have to then buy it from the Scottish government...

  • @TomHartillYou do know the Black Watch has been disbanded right?I don't know where you are getting that that Scotland wouldn't be able to afford the Soldiers?Then again, the UK government can't afford its soldiers,so what's your point?"Scotland would NEVER be able to afford to send any of it's soldiers to war" Tell where there is a war that was necessary? I'm all for defence at home not invasion abroad.The wars abroad were propaganda, and for what,OIL!

  • @MrScottJMiller - No the black watch has not been dispanded... here is a video of them marching in 2008: watch?v=VO16kk-pkOM

    Many old regiments have simply been merged over the past 200 years, the black watch today is the result of various highland regiments merging, inlcudint the original black watch from the 18th and 19th centurary

    And I didn't say that Scotlandd wouldn't be able to afford an army, it just wouldn't be able to afford a very big one and it wouldn't be able to send it to war...

  • @MrScottJMiller ...and now take into account that despite Britain beoing such a small nation, it has the 4th largest military expendature and actually the amry is made up of quite large number of Scots, in which a large number of those Scottish soldiers would be out of work if Scotland did have an army, because a Scottish army would need to be very small.

    Soldiers just want to be soldiers... half the SAS is made up of Scots who would not like to be part of an army that don't fight much.

  • @MrScottJMiller ...Scotland does not have any Scotish oil companies and so would be forced to use BP to actually get at the oil. The point i was making is that the money Scotland would get from the oil would probably equal military expendature cost.

    Did you know that North Sea oil only makes up 6% of BP's oil, and 24% of British Gas oil... the North Sea is not that good.

    I donlt really see why Scotland wants independance... it would never be as powerful or rich without GB...

  • @TomHartill So are you saying that every company in England is English? No.so there would be no difference to the companies who would stay where they are and sell to the existing and/or new countries.I think your missing the point that British companies are not just paid by England and therefore anything that is owned by the UK government should be split accordingly for the amount of oil that was STOLEN from Scotland and that includes BP.A larger tax should be levied on existing oil companies.

  • @MrScottJMiller - I never said that every company in England is English - what I said is that those military manufacturing companies ARE English and NOT Scottish.

    stolen oil? - maybe England should ask for all the money which Scotland has "stolen" from the English tax payer to pay for public services, or maybe the billions which have bailed out Scottish banks.

    You know England has done a lot for Scotland, if you want independence thats fine with me, it would be your loss.

  • @TomHartill I NEVER said the companies are Scottish, YOU brought that point up..BUT...those companies that are owned by the British government should be handed over to the Scottish government. Where are you getting the rest from? It's the usual spin that the English media puts on that the poor English are subsidising Scotland and Wales so that they can have a better health system.If I remember correctly it was the English banks that collapsed first, not the Scottish and AFTER we bailed England.

  • @MrScottJMiller - Why should they be handed over to the Scottish government?

    1) BAE has it's headquarters in London.

    2) The company would not even exist if were not for England.

    3) Scotland or any Scottish person or company does NOT own a majority share hold.

    4) The founders of BAE or BAe or MES were NOT Scottish.

    As for banks... the Bank of Scotland and RBS are now 80% owned by the british government after being bailed out by british tax payers which are a majority English.

  • @TomHartill I never said that they should. Those companies were started by BRITISH tax payers money so it is fitting that they should be broken up accordingly.

    So the banks that RBS were pumping money into before they were sold or were nationalised before taking RBS down, should pay back the RBS should they not? Or is it a case of the good being made to look bad because of others failings?

  • @TomHartill The effects weren't felt in Scotland for a good two or three years after the English banks and house prices collapsed. Guess you don't hear much except the bad points about Scotland from the English media though eh?

  • @MrScottJMiller - We heard about English banks... but guess what... they did not do no where nearly as bad as the Scottish banks.

    "English media" we share the same media, we watch the same TV and both have the same internet.

    So what currency would Scotland use exactly?

  • @TomHartill Well, that just goes to show how much you actually know!! So Northern Rock didn't collapse first and start taking down the banks before Scottish banks who were trying to bail out the English banks?We DO NOT share the same media.All English media is England Bias.We have our own news channels and news papers and we hear more about England than England does about Scotland. I know this for fact!

  • @MrScottJMiller - Northern Rock is 1 bank. England has many banks, Scotland has 2 banks which I know of, which both are now 80% owned by the government. hence my comment: "they did not do no where nearly as bad as the Scottish banks" - so how is my comment incorrect?

    You are correct about Scotland hearing more about Scotland, but so what?

    English media is not biasd at all - in fact I could easily say the same thing about Scottish media covering Scottish independance.

  • @TomHartill Bradford and Bingley, Lloyds TSB not to mention Alliance and Leicester and Abbey who were also sold to Santander.

    ""English media" we share the same media, we watch the same TV and both have the same internet." Is what YOU said.

    "well u seem to think that English people just want Scotland to remain part of GB for our gain"...WRONG! I never said that, I know the English opinion.

  • @TomHartill You do know the creation of the Bank of England was proposed by a Scotsman and we print our own money right? We used to have Pound Scot's before the Union..

  • @MrScottJMiller - So what if the bank of England was proposed by a Scotsman? - the concept of a central bank was NOT.

    And actually in my opinion the very idea of a privately owned central bank was the worst idea ever thought of... and is the main reason why we are in such a financial mess in the first place.

  • @MrScottJMiller - You talk of biasd English media... well u seem to think that English people just want Scotland to remain part of GB for our gain - this notion has obviously been given to you by Sottish media.

    I listen to the radio a lot while i'm working and have heard a lot of debates about Scotland... you know most English people think it should be up to the Scottish to remain part of GB, the main reason a lot of us would like you to remain with us is because we would actually be sad...

  • @MrScottJMiller ... to see you leave. We also genuinly think it would be bad for BOTH our countries, and after a LOT of research and in depth knowledge of the economy and the monetary system I actually do think it would be very bad for Scotland.

    One of the debates I heard had an English guy saying that if Scotland wants to go, then let them go, it would be their loss, not ours.

    You know if anything, what I hear on the radio is actually more sided towards Scotland getting independence.

  • "Did you know that North Sea oil only makes up 6% of BP's oil, and 24% of British Gas oil... the North Sea is not that good." .The world is a big place and the North Sea Oil turned Norway from an almost third world country into the top five richest countries in the world.If Scotland had the oil in the first place we would be in a similar position now! It would be better for Scotland to be and independent trading power NOW before the oil runs our than later when we have none and brushed aside.

  • @MrScottJMiller ... What exactly would be different if Scotland was not part of GB, other than both our country's economies would shrink and we would simply not be as powerful?

  • @TomHartill We export, Electricity,Chemical, Pharmaceuticals,Fish,textiles,­materials,wood,coal,nuclear materials,petroleum,petroleum goods, metals,the obvious food and drink of course non of those compare to the exports of Oil, neither is there anything in any other part of the UK or Norway. It is nonsense to assume that the money that would come from oil would all be used on military and I have no idea where that comes from!The UK's military budget is unnecessary overspending as is.

  • @MrScottJMiller Well said mate, We are an underrated country

  • @TomHartill Are you saying that Scotland has no other exports and does not export any military hardware? Are you saying that Scotland doesn't already have a military force? I'm not sure what your point of the military has to do with it unless you think England is the only military force in the UK?

  • @MrScottJMiller Ask yourself why Scotland ISN'T independent now. It's because the Scottish people vote for it NOT to be.

    Jesus wept, it's not rocket science. If Scotland wanted independence, they'd get it next election, stop looking for new "Blame England" excuses.

  • @AlexisCapri "It's because the Scottish people vote for it NOT to be." When was that exactly?The referendum in 1997 was for devolution and the setting up of a Scottish parliament with which there was a 74% majority for doing so.SNP has been the majority party in the past two elections, the last being an overall majority, which means that the people are more for Independence than ever before.Westminster has to ALLOW any votes in Scotland, or didn't you know that? Where did I blame England?

  • @MrScottJMiller Fuck me ! I have been living and working inThailand for the last year or so. Please tell me when all the independence shit is going down as I still have a pad in Aberdeen. How I wish I could get STV over here for all the latest news ? Oh and that fine young weatherman telling the good people of the north east that it's going to rain again? Lol

  • @DAVEYBOND007 Hahaha...you mean Sean Batty? hahaha...