I found this video, because I am sick of hearing the like of "Conservatives" say that Dr Paul is unelectable! And then not say why... Sounds like they just want to say "shut up" in a nice way... ie, Rush Limbaugh. I like Rush but I cannot respect him because of this.
So I am motivated to find my fellow patriots that will send a strong message on this issue of Dr Paul's "Electability"!
RON PAUL, WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR AN ANSWER! TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE HOW EXACTLY RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? OK LETS SAY ALL TROOPS CAME BACK AND THEN WHAT? THEY ARE GOING TO SELL IPHONES AND BLACKBERRIES? DUDE BE A MEN, HOW RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4 B CHINESE WORK LIKE ROBOTS, BE HONEST TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BUY UR BOOK U NEED CASH , U LOVE POWER, U LOVE CASH, U WILL NEVER CREATE JOBS, U HAVE NO ANSWER!
I had respect for Dr. Paul. He is a Gentleman and presents himself with class & dignity. I lost that respect for Dr. Paul when I learned he, as an intern, watched a baby be cut from his/her mothers' belly, put in a bucket on the floor and put in a corner to die while they all watched. What prevented him from taking that LIVE, CRYING baby out of that trash can and walking a few steps over to the Intensive Care Unit and saving it? He's lost my respect.
That sounds completely absurd and I'm pretty sure you're a liar. If you didn't just make it up, post a reputable link to a quote or article that references that "incident".
@rolfewiz Before you embarrass yourself & Dr. Paul further, LQQK at Dr. Pauls’ recent speech at the Iowa Straw Poll Debates. 90 seconds in he describes WATCHING a live, crying baby, basically thrown in a bucket, (OMG!!!) put in a corner and left to die! He VERY easily & LEGALLY, could have picked that baby up out of that trash can, ran a few steps away to the ICU, & saved that baby. You present yourself a as low information, low education, low class voter based on your comment.
Well I googled it and you're absolutely right. I'm sorry. Ron Paul apparently said pretty much exactly what you wrote. I suppose I should have googled it before calling you a liar. It was an honest mistake. You could definitely call me naive for thinking the scenario Paul described was so outrageous that it couldn't be true, but calling me low education and low class seems pretty extreme.
@rolfewiz An apology is not necessary, I appreciate that you did actually do some research to inform yourself better. Hopefully you learned an important lesson on how you react and interact with people you may disagree with both online and in "real life". Take Care.
@whereismybailouttv Oh you mean hes not a complete sellout that doesn't lie to everyone? Hes not in anyones pocket? He doesn't put Israel first? He stands firmly by his principles? How fringe.
ATTENTION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IF RON PAUL WILL BECOME US PRESIDENT, OTHER COUNTRIES WILL TELL US WHAT TO DO!
RON PAUL UR NOT STRONG PRESIDENT, U HAVE NO ENERGY TO RUN THIS POWERFUL COUNTRY,
SPEND TIME WITH GRANDCHILDREN, WRITE UR PUSSY BOOKS, GO SAVE PEOPLE DYING FROM AIDS IN AFRICA, GET TESTOSTERONE INJECTIONS AND CHECK ON UR PROSTATE, BASICALY OPEN PUBLIC
CLINICS USA WILL NEVER BE A PUSSY COUNTRY! PUT THAT NOTE ON UR FRIDGE! SO WHEN U WAKE UP AT NITE TO TAKE PISS!
Some journalists make me sick. Did he really say that America was involved in five wars! How on earth did he come up with that figure. So the second world war was not really one war becuse USA was fighting the Japanese in how many countries and Hitler in how many countries so by this journalists logic America was fighting 20+ wars JEEZ
Dr. Ron Paul is the PERFECT Conservative. Ron Paul was a hero to Buckley & Reagan. Ron Paul is NOT a Greed-Infested USA-hating Constitution-hating Neocon (All other Republicans became NEOCONS), Ron Paul is a TRUE Eisenhower-Goldwater-Buckley CONSERVATIVE.
Ron Paul is a True Fiscal Conservative.
Ron is also a Social Conservative (He wants States to Vote on the issues and decide for themselves)
Ron is Smart on Defense (Ron has been right on all defense issues, he disagrees with Wars based on Lies)
As long as we don't know who voted for who, the unconstitutional government can has and will rig the votes to their puppet president so they can have their way.
Legalization is NOT a libertarian idea. It's based on common sense!
Besides, "libertarian" Ron Paul still wants Big Government to deside over womens lives and invade her uteruce by denying her the right to choose when it comes to abortion! He is against gay marriage! Which means he is NOT in favor of separation between church and state. Paine and Jefferson would consider Ron Paul as nothing more than a hack whom have selective principles.
@bohemianwriter1 No,he says that abortion is a matter for the states and that it is morally wrong to forceably tax people to provide funds for abortion if they believe it to be murder. 2. He states that gays can make any voluntary commitments between eachother/among themselves that they please,as can any individual and the state shuldn't be able to poke its nose in.
@bohemianwriter1 Should a rape victim be denied an abortion?? Of course she should, two wrongs do not make a right. I think you perhaps need to reflect on that a little. Should a child in the womb be denied life??
So who are youy to invade other peoples privacy? Whio made you judge? Or maybe you would deny your own daughter abortion if she was raped at the ageof 12 and there was danger for her life! You have NO moral right, nor any authoritarian right to deny anything that does not concern you. Then you are a proponent of a police state based on religious dogma, and corporate power.
@bohemianwriter1 Proponent of a police state?? Are you kidding me, I am a classical liberal and great enemy of the police state. It is statists such as yourself whom are responsible for the police state. A girl (regardless of age) has no moral right to kill a child within her womb. "The first duty of government is the protection of life, not it's destruction...the chief purpose of government is to protect life. Abandon that and you have abandoned all" - Thomas Jefferson
@W ahh you must be pro life. WRONG you are not pro life you are pro perspective. let me guess u are also one of those..THOU SHALL NOT KILL..you never eaten meat? you never wore a leather jacket?
something else jefferson went on about was freedom from state, as in, if its in your body that is your right to do wtf you want with it.
who is more alive, the "terrorist" and catlle and plant life\eco system that we destory? or a fetus whose brain has developed to the point it knows its alive?
@peterbaelish3 ??? What is wrong with pro-life. You liberal fucks all say women should have rights to their bodies. They do. They spread their legs like whores get knocked up and then use abortion as an alternative contraception. You are condoning killing of another human being because it doesn't even know it's human yet??? Let's kill all the mentally handicapped because they have no clue what's going on. People are not cattle, although people like you act like it.
@squiggnick um, you might wanna go easy there. clearly u didnt read the comment i was responding to. i am not a liberal i am not pro life or pro death, life is sacred but i am realistic. my comment was addressing a person with a religious mindset. i find them to be very hypocritical especially when they go on about pro life and thou shall not kill. my question to him was well put and i could care less how u answer it because i could guess it. his answer i wanted to see. they surprise even today.
@bohemianwriter1 The right to life is the first right. It is that right without which no other right can exist. LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
If government does not understand the principle of the sanctity of life do not expect it to care at all for your liberty. Our liberties are GOD endowed, not granted to us by government.
That is Bullshit and you kn ow it. Is this a normal modus for Christian fundies to lie, talk about freedom while you fundies want to impose your insane "values" on to others while your real agenda is freedom hating and antidemocratic?
You hacen't answered my question. If your teen daughter was victim of a rape. Would you force her to give birth to a cluster of celles that her rapist infested her body with? If you do, you are not much better than the Taliban.
Don't define a cluster of cells as fully developed human beings. Neither have you any right to dictate what others can do with their lices and use your bronze age desert dogmas as a crutch for your obvious lack of understandings of the simplest terms...
@bohemianwriter1 "Neither have you any right to dictate what others can do with their lives"?? Well people certainly DO HAVE A RIGHT to punish murderers.
Is a poor mother whom cannot afford a baby and do not want to give birth to the spawn of her rapist murderer?
By nthe way! You elected a mass murderer, a liar and a war criminal twice in 2000 and 2004! And did you know that more than a million people died as a result of the conversation between your idiot in chief and his space daddy? Abortion is not murder. Your god on the other hand is an insane mass murderer...
@bohemianwriter1 Seriously, come up with some off-the-wall doesn't happen shit. You people are so predictable, you always use the raped women now pregnant scenario. What percentage of abortions does that apply to? I will tell you, almost none. There could be exceptions to the rule, but really you need to look at the actually statistics of abortion. You people also always do comparisons, bring God into it, like it's his fault women are being whores.
@WorshipInTruth u are insane, rights are an idea, YOUR GOV made them up. but no lets say GOD did give you these rights (puts on carlin voice ) your rights have had to be ammended a number of times..so god forgot a couple things..like SLAVERY! JUST FUCKING SLIPPED HIS MIND. ah but different govs have different rights. why would god give dif people in dif places dif # of dif rights?
that sounds like human planning. you have no rights u have temporary privileges, unless u never heard of "pat act"
@bohemianwriter1 Abortion is not a privacy issue. A child is a child at any point of its life. You ignorant people always use the rape scenario or the danger of life issue. There are medical reason for doing something like that, if a child is raped and there was a danger to their life. The right thing to do would be to stop pregnancy. At the same time, if someone is raped there is the morning after pill. Not to mention rapist almost always use condoms so that not usually an issue.
Yes it is! No matter how yoyu try to spin it! You have used proved that you want to impliment Church into government, and have your particual church to dictate through law how people should live their lives. And you have also proven not to be a constitutional scholar. Did you learn your other statement about separation between church and state from Christine The Witch O'Donnel?
Rapists using condoms? You certainly claim to know a lot about rapists. Are you a rapist?
@bohemianwriter1 It has nothing to do with church. You prove yourself even more absurd with the rapist comment. Look at statistics. You keep using the church bullshit or comparing others to some retard I don't even know and it makes your whole argument fail. Argue with me by including thoughts based on your belief or statistics. You didnt argue with the morning after pill comment or give me anything better than rape blah blah blah or church blah blah blah. You know you are full of shit.
@bohemianwriter1 My wife and I have discussed this a couple years back, is she was to become pregnant again, and 8 months into the pregnancy, we found out the child was coming early but was almost guaranteed to live, but we had to choose her life or the babies. My wife would be the one to go. This is all about selfishness. Nothing to do with religion. It is not right to kill off a child because of financial reasons or fear. People just need to stop fucking everyone else.
That was your CHOICE was it not? Whom are you to decide what other people can and cannot choose? Listen! I am no fan of abortion. But that does NOT give me the right to dictate what others can choose? Are you in a position of dictating to others how they shall run their lives?
@bohemianwriter1 We decide everyday what is right and wrong. Look at suicide, we have a law that dictates that one has committed a crime if they attempt suicide and fail. If a person assists in the aide of anothers suicide they have committed a crime, but yet if a whore wants to kill someone that doesn't have the ability to speak for themselves, it's ok. We create laws and amendments to the Constitution to govern what is just and unjust and therefore telling everyone how to live their lives.
Your whole basis of argument is nothing more than fake emotions and fake concern of the cells. Hell! You don't give a shit about the living! Yoiu want to FORCE a girl to have an unwanted fetus and give birth! You don't give a shit about poor kids and their having food on the table or have access to healthcare. Yhe only thing you care about is a collection of cluster cells, not for living kids whom have to sacrifice so that you RW Christian corporatists can have your tax breaks.
@bohemianwriter1 A collection of cluster cells which would most assuredly become an adult human if given enough time. 99.9% of abortions have NOTHING to do with rape, most are performed on professional whores. You, my friend, obviously do not care about the sanctity of human life. "For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always." - John 12:8
@bohemianwriter1 Yes, abortions are largely funded by government. Do some research. We pay taxes so whores can not take resposiblity for their own action, or because their parents will find out they were fucking at 15.
So you are not only anti choice for women, supporting a Big Government what a woman can and cannot do with her own body. Take your skyspook into the picture makes you RW anti liberty morons even more pathetic. Using a non existent "god" to support your anti liberty stance. On top of that, you are calling women whores. Way to stay classy! You are not a libertarian. You are just a RW moron whom wants to smoke weed and decide how others are living their lives...
@bohemianwriter1 See, you are just another idiot. There is no such thing as separation of church and state. That is not in the Constitution, read that shit again. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" congress shall make no law on the belief of one religion or force a religion on someone neither shall it prohibit the free exercise of any religion. The Constitution should not be overly interpreted.
Well you certainly have not read your Thomas Jefferson or Thomas Paine and their relationship to religion. "There should be a wall of separation between church and state". Which means that politics and religion should not mix. It's obvious you are of a different opinion that religion should interfere with politics with it's dogmas. You think that is Thomas Jeffersen actually meant when he tore out most of the bible pages and let only a few pages left?
@bohemianwriter1 And why does everyone that reads it verbatim have to be taking a religious standpoint. You are almost like a Salem witch hunter. OH HOLY SHIT, THAT PERSON DISAGREES, WITCH, THAT FUCKER'S A WITCH. You make me laugh. You're funny I think I'll call you.....Chubbles. What's really funny Chubbles is alot of the things and videos you have placed on your page, I agree with. I'll reply one more time to clarify.
@bohemianwriter1 I believe that all drugs should be legal, less people would do them if people would quit saying even shit like pot is dangerous. If people want to do heroin and die from it, so be it, we will be better off. I believe the shit with Obama, the shit with Bush, with Osama, i agree, I even believe that we deserved what happened to our country because of what our country has done to theirs. None of which is a religious view.
I understand that you want to criminalize sick people. All people whomtries to commit suicide are criminals in your eyesm and want to punish them. Is pot dangerous? Should one be treated as a criminal for smoking a plant? Isn't that a direct intervention of ones private lives?
I think your stance directly contradicts both Jefferson and George Washington. Both grew hemp, and George smoked it for teeth aches. Criminal by todays standards?
@bohemianwriter1 Are you kidding me? I was simply making a statement. You are a very blind person. Blind to what is right/wrong, who to protect, and what people around you are actually saying. If you want to kill yourself, do the world a favor, and if you fail, I would only punish you for being too stupid to kill yourself. Pot isn't dangerous, neither is Salvia. As far as abortions go, maybe if women didn't spread their legs so much like whores, this wouldn't be an issue. But it is murder
Well, yoy are making statements taken out of your own ass, thinking that your particular "values" of what people can do with their lives is somewhat more valiud than others, thinking you can impose those "values" onto others...
I also see that you have clear misogynic tendencies. Maybe tolerated in Saudi Arabia about women being whores, but here, you are just another rable rousing asshat...
@bohemianwriter1 And still disregard any and every statement that I make. I say something, you say I said something else, I explain it to you, you continue to go off of what you said that I said. You tell me I disagree with drugs and suicide, I explain it to you, you keep going. Instead of making an argument to what was said you continue to break people down into what you think they resemble. When can we move on to point and counterpoints???
@bohemianwriter1 Oh, and if we as a country didn't "impose" our "values" on others there would be no laws. Laws, rules, regulations, all a collective of someone's values to regulate the country. Should we do away with standards entirely? And I'm just so sorry that I expect women to hold themselves to a higher standard than to subject themselves to sex toys. Also you were looking for misogynistic not misogynic.
Again, you are for a Big Brother state! Wanna criminalize women who for one reason or another needs an abortion, pot smokers, gays, liberals and anyone whom do not adhere to your "values". Despite the fact that your values stink to hog heaven with nothing in commmon with liberalism or personal freedom. Like I said, "Libertarians" are just republicans whom wanst to smoke dope and get laid. Your "standards" belong in the 16th century. Except there was no punishment for smoking a plant back then.
Gary Johnson has the relevent record, using the power of veto to tame spending. Paul not. Would use his power as CiC to bring the troops home (which sadly Obama hasn't done). Paul would. GJ is not an anti-woman barbarian. Paul is. And his free-market fundamentalism should appeal to donors (the privatisation nutters). Like Paul. Plus GJ got elected in a democratic state, that might carry the base in these times.
Johnson/Paul 2012 anyone? Real Republicans, Real Change?
@quezcatol "I really love how people think anyone needs to follow the advice some guy gaved 300 years ago."
Going by that comment, then why would billions of people today follow the advice of some guy or guys gave 2,000 years ago? Jesus and Mohammad? Maybe it's because thier advice is even more relevant today.
All NWO puppets. Judge FAT HEAD is for now the NWO pot stirrer. Anyone on MSM channels is playing a part. The only real hope for AMERICANS IS DEATH US GOVERNMENT and representatives. State government is the only hope for the USA.
@metapatriot You morons are pathetic, its pretty obvious that when they say Ron Paul can't win, they mean he can't win the Presidential Election you inbreds! And its true, Ron Paul will NEVER Win ANY Presidential race EVER! What is this like his 3rd run? I thinks its suffice to say that Ron Paul will NEVER win!
@deeppurple28 Really? He can't win the Presidential Election?
Why?
He already has almost as many Voters ready to vote for him as Obama - feel free to look at the public polls.
The only thing that can hang him up is the Republican Nomination - but WE who were willing to register As Republicans to vote in the Primaries will support him there.
Once we get a debate with him vs Obama - Obama's backing will vanish, and Dr. Paul can easily win.
i wont vote for ron paul on the premise that, he is against equality of homosexuals, against a womans choice for abortion, wants to give states rights, and weaken the fed-government making it possible for a clusterfuck of statelaw-differentiation on many key subjects, making people forced to leave their states to other states to recieve what is considered illegal, his idea of balancing the economy is along the lines of ryan plan, and his views are against the constitution. hes a sham, a fake.
@TheAtheistHominid Actually you would be wrong about his views of gay equality. He is for equal footing. And he even questions the need for a marriage license. Also his main point about abortion is that it should be left up to the states but should not be federally funded.
@TheAtheistHominid you have been mis-informed. While Ron Paul is against abortion, he doesn't want to impose his will on others. He would let individual states figure out this issue most likely. The only time he voted against abortion legislation is in the instance of partial birth, and he's not against it when the mother's life is in danger. (continued)
@TheAtheistHominid (continued) On marriage, he doesn't want the government involved in straight marriage, never mind gay. If churches wanted to marry anyone, gay or straight, they should have the right to if they choose, and that married person is no different in the eyes of the state.
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself,
if ron paul actually got close enough to be a threat he would never survive long enough to see a day in the oval office. no one outside the round table will ever see the inside of that place.
WARNING watching television, causes the viewer’s brain waves to slip into a hypnotic, post-REM delta sleep in this state, any number of post-hypnotic suggestions can be implanted in the mind of the viewer Since television is such a powerful tool, and its existence is licensed and regulated by government, there will never be any objective, rational discussion of civil rights, or government scams and cons such as income tax or the Federal Reserve system explained in that broadcast medium.
again you act as though there are no bush's and hitler's in the world. remember that bug last year that reached 5 continents in like 2 weeks? imagine that being weaponized. such as the new H5N1 virus that kills 85% of its victims? you don't think there could be a culling of the population by the elite of the world that run the planet?
Ron Paul can't even run his own newsletter, let alone a country. He is incompetent at governing, a quality a lot of libertardians obviously find admirable.
Why is Ron Paul "unelectable"? Because of his age? Because he doesn't want public money to fund abortion? Because he wants to shut down the fake "Federal" Reserve? Why is Ron Paul unelectable, why? Someone tell me please!
Have we NEVER elected someone who was in their 70's to be President?
Have we NEVER elected someone for President that was against using public money to fund abortion? HAVE WE NEVER ELECTED SOMEONE WHO WANTED TO GIVE BACK CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY AND THE MONEY TO THE PEOPLE??
a one world government? let me explain something to you that is pretty basic shit. a ship at sea has air tight separate compartments for a reason. so you can seal off a flooded part of the ship and stop the rest of ship from filling up with water. boundaries act the same way for nations. this keeps the hitler's of the world confined. one world gov't cannot work for this simple reason. they want to ban all resistance and call them terrorists. terrorists have no rights in our country.
Democrats and independents should register Republican for a few months just to vote for Paul. The GOP establishment would hate it if he won. It would be worth it just to see them squirm come election season.
%100 agree, love Paul or hate him any concerned citizen needs to be voting in Republican primaries if they don't want Romney or Palin because I tell you who is unelectable is Obomber.
My most unbiased assessment I don't see how he has any path other than fraud and rigging to re-election.
He dropped 10 points the day after he had the nomination secure for that FISA vote.
THIS 'NOT ELECTABLE' BULLSHTI IS THE IS ALL ABOUT IMPLANTING A CONCEPT ,HOWEVER WRONG,AND THE RETARDED...CONFORMIST AMERICAN PUBLIC...SO UNABLE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES...WILL RUN AROUND REPEATING IT OVER AND OVER...PERFECT SENARIO-ALL THE TV WATCHING SHIT HEADS PUBLIC ATTACK AND EAT THE ELITES...GET SICK AND DIE...WE EXPERIENCE A RENASSAINCE....GET THE ELITES GOLD AND STOLEN TECHNOLOGY....NIRVANA!!!
The only way we can get this man elected is to spread the word. Talk about the good of Ron Paul, talk to your friends, your family, your neighbors, your co-workers. Talk to everyone you can get them to look into Ron Paul and try to get them to tell 2 other people.
How, in the name of Christ, is Ron Paul "not electable". If he is truely not electable it is only because the neo-cons and commies in the media have repeated that statement a trillion times. You know they say that repetitive slogans are the most basic form of mind control.
Primaries definately harder than the general election for either Paul or Johnson...I am against our voting system and parties in general but I am registered as a Republican. It causes me no harm (no for the past 5 years anyway) and lets me vote (in PA) in the primaries. Please consider the same measure yourself.
Propaganda works on most people; statistically it probably works on you! The only way to overcome it is to learn about it. Please educate yourself on all forms of propaganda. Don't assume you know enough about it.
that's pretty much the usual treatment of ron paul by the mainstream press. i don't adhere to capitalist libertarian positions, but the reality is ron paul is not shoved aside because he is a libertarian, calling for lower taxes and smaller government, but because he wants to put an end to the imperial foreign policy of the united states, which means a lot of lost money for the likes of GE and fox news financiers.
@ufster81 It also means a lot of resources that the U.S. doesn't get so cheap anymore, that when we buy these resources, we'll be funding terrorism. It means that Iran will get nukes and cause an arms race. That's the last thing we need at this point in the world.
us did get oil cheaper before it was involved in the iraq war or the middle eastern matters for that reason. the price of a barrel of oil in 2000 was around 35 usd and since the war, on average of 80+ usd per barrel.
you see, wars and weapons don't create stability you little troll, they stifle economies and destroy productivity, whatever your means of production are, capitalist or communist.
well, you can start getting rid of your own nukes and pressure israel to get rid of theirs... nuclear proliferation is not a one sided policy where you get to keep yours and tell everyone else to get rid of theirs, especially when you are developing "tactical nukes" that you claim to be usable in the battlefield...
us used two nuclear bombs on civilians... that is not being civilized you fucking cunt. and yes, there is no comparison, iran hasn't fought an aggressive war for the past 300 years, period.
you're just a closet homosexual who is projecting your repressed sexual feelings for your classmates onto the world by acting like a warmongering tough guy. yeah, there is one of you teens in every youtube video acting macho and calling people liberal pussies. it goes to show why you would call people pussies, since you hate pussies so much, don't you.
do you understand the irony in asking a pacifist to kill himself ?
were you always this stupid or did they do some kind of experiments on you to remove the evil part of your brain and accidentally removed the part which is responsible for rational thinking so you ended up being both stupid and mean spirited ?
@ufster81 Suicide doesn't have to be violent. douche. You're the one who doesn't understand that we're all running out of natural resources and that we're going to die if we continue to live this way. Governments need to unite and find solutions. We cant have muslim extremist assholes in this world. They refuse to take part in modern civilization. They are scum and so are you.
yeah dude, death is never violent, except that you die... which is in itself an act of violence, towards your conscious being that you put an end to, you dumb cornholio.
look, if you're so concerned about the survival of others, why don't you eliminate yourself first ? you'll be saving us plenty of resources by not taking up any of our time and effort which can be placed constructively elsewhere. right now, you're just inhibiting the rest of us.
@ufster81 ..............please rethink the suicide thing, because that comment was so fucking stupid that I'M about to kill myself. and by the way, nice job dodging my point earlier. you know damn well that i'm right, but you choose to ignore it and stick to your ron paul douchebaggery.
you can't even read a fucking dictionary so in behalf of all rational people of this world, please do kill yourself, you'll be making a huge contribution to the future generations by significantly increasing the average IQ of the human population..
merriam-webster -> violent: caused by force : not natural (as in the case of suicide)
@ufster81 Ok, so then I'm VIOLENTLY typing, I'm VIOLENTLY moving my mouse. i mean that's just plain stupidity. And why don't you address my comment from before, about our natural resources? you completely dodged it.
how is moving your mouse not natural you fucking moron ?
i mean you are plain stupid if you can't grasp the notion that violent (caused by force, not natural) death as in the case of suicide (self applied, not natural) is not remotely connected with the acts of moving your mouse or typing on your keyboard, you moronic dipshit ?
you haven't made a point because you haven't provided any evidence for your claim that war is a solution.
Hey FGTS take your slap fight somewhere else, may I suggest a TPMTV video. Were trying to have a rational conversation about the contrasting views of Libertarianism & Marxism and how they could be implemented and would apply to a modern society.
i think my motive of humiliating through brutal education a warmongering bitch is a more noble cause than you discussing marxism... is that ok with you ?
@ufster81 brutal education? you completely ignored my comment before. you're ignoring the issues and explaining the definition of violence to me. plleeeeeeease dude fucking pleeeease.
"you're ignoring the issues" sounds just like someone who has a hard time explaining the issues, perhaps because he doesn't know the first thing about "the issues". go fucking play with your toys, you moron.
@ufster81 K your violent suicide argument is a waste of time cuz you're a fucking idiot. again, not addressing my argument. goodbye. fucking waste of life
i proved my case you fucking moron. suicide is a form of violent death... you have no arguments against it except for calling me names and arguing it's a waste of time, which goes to show you're a fucking moron for insisting on an argument with which you were both wrong and deliberately wasting my time.
@ufster81 stop talking about suicide. it's a waste of time. i'm still waiting for you to address my comment on the environment and politics. you're trying to distract me with the argument on suicide (that you're having with yourself btw).
well, if it was a waste of time, you shouldn't have insisted on wasting my time getting schooled on the topic. maybe you just like being pwned.
your argument on politics and environment is a non-sequitur, an argument which the premise is unrelated with the conclusion. we can be perfectly self sufficient and environmentally sustaining within nation states or even smaller political entities so a global solution is not a necessary one.
@ufster81 "we can be perfectly self sufficient and environmentally sustaining within nation states". ummm no, wrong, absolutely wrong. We're going to keep fighting and keep growing in population. The world is not going to work together on this because of competition between nations, and greed. Our population ALONE is unsustainable. The only way to live sustainably is if we have one government. That way there is no war, and competition between nations. The people can be spoken to without conflict
Greece(TheGeatx4) knows what he(she) says. They got the real crisis.
Vote for Ron Paul he is your and our only chance. Europe is counting on you.
You got SOPA,PIPA,NDAA passed now, you will fall into totalitarism.
Don't repeat Hitler and Stalin scenarios. Save your country and rest of the world.
We are fighting against ACTA in Europe now. They wan't to take our freedom worldwide.
Vote for Ron Paul. Save us.
Phi1eap 3 weeks ago
"Because of his age"? Please. Enough with this ridiculous ageism!
0Enidan0 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I found this video, because I am sick of hearing the like of "Conservatives" say that Dr Paul is unelectable! And then not say why... Sounds like they just want to say "shut up" in a nice way... ie, Rush Limbaugh. I like Rush but I cannot respect him because of this.
So I am motivated to find my fellow patriots that will send a strong message on this issue of Dr Paul's "Electability"!
johannas58 3 months ago
no no no don't fall into FOX trap! Don't let aipac take over our elections again!
spemux 5 months ago
We all need to fight back!
Start posting "RICK PERRY IS UNELECTABLE" on his videos!
WostUsernameEVER 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL, WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR AN ANSWER! TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE HOW EXACTLY RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? OK LETS SAY ALL TROOPS CAME BACK AND THEN WHAT? THEY ARE GOING TO SELL IPHONES AND BLACKBERRIES? DUDE BE A MEN, HOW RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4 B CHINESE WORK LIKE ROBOTS, BE HONEST TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BUY UR BOOK U NEED CASH , U LOVE POWER, U LOVE CASH, U WILL NEVER CREATE JOBS, U HAVE NO ANSWER!
democratsaresmart 6 months ago
I had respect for Dr. Paul. He is a Gentleman and presents himself with class & dignity. I lost that respect for Dr. Paul when I learned he, as an intern, watched a baby be cut from his/her mothers' belly, put in a bucket on the floor and put in a corner to die while they all watched. What prevented him from taking that LIVE, CRYING baby out of that trash can and walking a few steps over to the Intensive Care Unit and saving it? He's lost my respect.
thenewmike2012 6 months ago
@thenewmike2012
That sounds completely absurd and I'm pretty sure you're a liar. If you didn't just make it up, post a reputable link to a quote or article that references that "incident".
rolfewiz 5 months ago
@rolfewiz Before you embarrass yourself & Dr. Paul further, LQQK at Dr. Pauls’ recent speech at the Iowa Straw Poll Debates. 90 seconds in he describes WATCHING a live, crying baby, basically thrown in a bucket, (OMG!!!) put in a corner and left to die! He VERY easily & LEGALLY, could have picked that baby up out of that trash can, ran a few steps away to the ICU, & saved that baby. You present yourself a as low information, low education, low class voter based on your comment.
thenewmike2012 5 months ago
@thenewmike2012
Well I googled it and you're absolutely right. I'm sorry. Ron Paul apparently said pretty much exactly what you wrote. I suppose I should have googled it before calling you a liar. It was an honest mistake. You could definitely call me naive for thinking the scenario Paul described was so outrageous that it couldn't be true, but calling me low education and low class seems pretty extreme.
rolfewiz 5 months ago
@rolfewiz An apology is not necessary, I appreciate that you did actually do some research to inform yourself better. Hopefully you learned an important lesson on how you react and interact with people you may disagree with both online and in "real life". Take Care.
thenewmike2012 5 months ago
Gary Johnson step aside and let your daddy drive the liberty bus, just sit back and enjoy the view!
Allanlegacy43 6 months ago
HELL NO! HE WILL BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT! HE WINS!
slumberingsam 6 months ago
Yes. Because like it or not, he's seen as a "fringe" candidate.
whereismybailouttv 6 months ago
@whereismybailouttv Oh you mean hes not a complete sellout that doesn't lie to everyone? Hes not in anyones pocket? He doesn't put Israel first? He stands firmly by his principles? How fringe.
WakingMajority 6 months ago
countercurrents * org/bailout240711 * htm
THE FED GOT AUDITED! Ron Paul was right to be suspicious. thumbs up so ppl see
rickyx1 7 months ago 8
if Americans dont elect Ron Paul,they will pay the price,you got it wrong the first time
get it right now
as we did when we didnt elect the right people
Greedings from Greece
TheGreatx4 7 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
ATTENTION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IF RON PAUL WILL BECOME US PRESIDENT, OTHER COUNTRIES WILL TELL US WHAT TO DO!
RON PAUL UR NOT STRONG PRESIDENT, U HAVE NO ENERGY TO RUN THIS POWERFUL COUNTRY,
SPEND TIME WITH GRANDCHILDREN, WRITE UR PUSSY BOOKS, GO SAVE PEOPLE DYING FROM AIDS IN AFRICA, GET TESTOSTERONE INJECTIONS AND CHECK ON UR PROSTATE, BASICALY OPEN PUBLIC
CLINICS USA WILL NEVER BE A PUSSY COUNTRY! PUT THAT NOTE ON UR FRIDGE! SO WHEN U WAKE UP AT NITE TO TAKE PISS!
democratsaresmart 9 months ago
I'm just watching this and looking at the stocks. All the red arrows. I think I'm going to cry and move to canada. :(
wingsofliberty437 9 months ago
Ron Paul will NEVER Win, the Presidential Election!
deeppurple28 9 months ago
Some journalists make me sick. Did he really say that America was involved in five wars! How on earth did he come up with that figure. So the second world war was not really one war becuse USA was fighting the Japanese in how many countries and Hitler in how many countries so by this journalists logic America was fighting 20+ wars JEEZ
iLuvAkeys4ever 9 months ago
Dr. Ron Paul is the PERFECT Conservative. Ron Paul was a hero to Buckley & Reagan. Ron Paul is NOT a Greed-Infested USA-hating Constitution-hating Neocon (All other Republicans became NEOCONS), Ron Paul is a TRUE Eisenhower-Goldwater-Buckley CONSERVATIVE.
Ron Paul is a True Fiscal Conservative.
Ron is also a Social Conservative (He wants States to Vote on the issues and decide for themselves)
Ron is Smart on Defense (Ron has been right on all defense issues, he disagrees with Wars based on Lies)
halcyon0830 9 months ago
Anyone who worships Wall St. has a chance. He just has to behave & they''ll take care of him.
tripfunkmonster 9 months ago
Ah, I see Eddie Munster has grown up and playing a judge on TV now..
bellcord 9 months ago
I still think a Ron Paul, Gary Johnson ticket would be badass
666Qtip666 10 months ago 3
@666Qtip666 I don't know much about Gary Johnson, I'd like to learn more about him though honestly. I'll do some research on him right now.
xtremejohnny69 10 months ago
What the fuck is a Gary Johnson? Ron Paul all the way.
wipemysmile 10 months ago 3
Johnson isn't really a Libertarian.He pays good lipservice but if you examine his positions,he doesn't quite cut it.
jonnyy40 10 months ago
As long as we don't know who voted for who, the unconstitutional government can has and will rig the votes to their puppet president so they can have their way.
Mikeal74 10 months ago
Human rights are "social engineering" according to Paul...
dude12nothin 10 months ago
The electorate are too dumb
thorkyll 10 months ago
i would marrie an american woman to become a legal citizen to vote for ron paul
dongerado 10 months ago
sooo.. everybody who votes for ron paul is a gay pot smoking hippy???
dongerado 10 months ago
ron paul looks like frasiers dad
dongerado 10 months ago
Legalization is NOT a libertarian idea. It's based on common sense!
Besides, "libertarian" Ron Paul still wants Big Government to deside over womens lives and invade her uteruce by denying her the right to choose when it comes to abortion! He is against gay marriage! Which means he is NOT in favor of separation between church and state. Paine and Jefferson would consider Ron Paul as nothing more than a hack whom have selective principles.
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 No,he says that abortion is a matter for the states and that it is morally wrong to forceably tax people to provide funds for abortion if they believe it to be murder. 2. He states that gays can make any voluntary commitments between eachother/among themselves that they please,as can any individual and the state shuldn't be able to poke its nose in.
jonnyy40 10 months ago
@jonnyy40
So he wants to move the big brother authoritarian federal government moved to the states?
And are abortions being funded by government?
And should a poor kid, say a rape victim be denied abortion just because she can't afford it because she is poor?
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Should a rape victim be denied an abortion?? Of course she should, two wrongs do not make a right. I think you perhaps need to reflect on that a little. Should a child in the womb be denied life??
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@WorshipInTruth
So who are youy to invade other peoples privacy? Whio made you judge? Or maybe you would deny your own daughter abortion if she was raped at the ageof 12 and there was danger for her life! You have NO moral right, nor any authoritarian right to deny anything that does not concern you. Then you are a proponent of a police state based on religious dogma, and corporate power.
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Proponent of a police state?? Are you kidding me, I am a classical liberal and great enemy of the police state. It is statists such as yourself whom are responsible for the police state. A girl (regardless of age) has no moral right to kill a child within her womb. "The first duty of government is the protection of life, not it's destruction...the chief purpose of government is to protect life. Abandon that and you have abandoned all" - Thomas Jefferson
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@W ahh you must be pro life. WRONG you are not pro life you are pro perspective. let me guess u are also one of those..THOU SHALL NOT KILL..you never eaten meat? you never wore a leather jacket?
something else jefferson went on about was freedom from state, as in, if its in your body that is your right to do wtf you want with it.
who is more alive, the "terrorist" and catlle and plant life\eco system that we destory? or a fetus whose brain has developed to the point it knows its alive?
peterbaelish3 10 months ago
@peterbaelish3 ??? What is wrong with pro-life. You liberal fucks all say women should have rights to their bodies. They do. They spread their legs like whores get knocked up and then use abortion as an alternative contraception. You are condoning killing of another human being because it doesn't even know it's human yet??? Let's kill all the mentally handicapped because they have no clue what's going on. People are not cattle, although people like you act like it.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@squiggnick um, you might wanna go easy there. clearly u didnt read the comment i was responding to. i am not a liberal i am not pro life or pro death, life is sacred but i am realistic. my comment was addressing a person with a religious mindset. i find them to be very hypocritical especially when they go on about pro life and thou shall not kill. my question to him was well put and i could care less how u answer it because i could guess it. his answer i wanted to see. they surprise even today.
peterbaelish3 9 months ago
@peterbaelish3 were you not saying that women have the right to do with their bodies what they see fit?
squiggnick 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 The right to life is the first right. It is that right without which no other right can exist. LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1
If government does not understand the principle of the sanctity of life do not expect it to care at all for your liberty. Our liberties are GOD endowed, not granted to us by government.
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
That is Bullshit and you kn ow it. Is this a normal modus for Christian fundies to lie, talk about freedom while you fundies want to impose your insane "values" on to others while your real agenda is freedom hating and antidemocratic?
You hacen't answered my question. If your teen daughter was victim of a rape. Would you force her to give birth to a cluster of celles that her rapist infested her body with? If you do, you are not much better than the Taliban.
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
Cont.
Don't define a cluster of cells as fully developed human beings. Neither have you any right to dictate what others can do with their lices and use your bronze age desert dogmas as a crutch for your obvious lack of understandings of the simplest terms...
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 "Neither have you any right to dictate what others can do with their lives"?? Well people certainly DO HAVE A RIGHT to punish murderers.
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@WorshipInTruth
Is a poor mother whom cannot afford a baby and do not want to give birth to the spawn of her rapist murderer?
By nthe way! You elected a mass murderer, a liar and a war criminal twice in 2000 and 2004! And did you know that more than a million people died as a result of the conversation between your idiot in chief and his space daddy? Abortion is not murder. Your god on the other hand is an insane mass murderer...
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Seriously, come up with some off-the-wall doesn't happen shit. You people are so predictable, you always use the raped women now pregnant scenario. What percentage of abortions does that apply to? I will tell you, almost none. There could be exceptions to the rule, but really you need to look at the actually statistics of abortion. You people also always do comparisons, bring God into it, like it's his fault women are being whores.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@WorshipInTruth u are insane, rights are an idea, YOUR GOV made them up. but no lets say GOD did give you these rights (puts on carlin voice ) your rights have had to be ammended a number of times..so god forgot a couple things..like SLAVERY! JUST FUCKING SLIPPED HIS MIND. ah but different govs have different rights. why would god give dif people in dif places dif # of dif rights?
that sounds like human planning. you have no rights u have temporary privileges, unless u never heard of "pat act"
peterbaelish3 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Abortion is not a privacy issue. A child is a child at any point of its life. You ignorant people always use the rape scenario or the danger of life issue. There are medical reason for doing something like that, if a child is raped and there was a danger to their life. The right thing to do would be to stop pregnancy. At the same time, if someone is raped there is the morning after pill. Not to mention rapist almost always use condoms so that not usually an issue.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@squiggnick
Yes it is! No matter how yoyu try to spin it! You have used proved that you want to impliment Church into government, and have your particual church to dictate through law how people should live their lives. And you have also proven not to be a constitutional scholar. Did you learn your other statement about separation between church and state from Christine The Witch O'Donnel?
Rapists using condoms? You certainly claim to know a lot about rapists. Are you a rapist?
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 It has nothing to do with church. You prove yourself even more absurd with the rapist comment. Look at statistics. You keep using the church bullshit or comparing others to some retard I don't even know and it makes your whole argument fail. Argue with me by including thoughts based on your belief or statistics. You didnt argue with the morning after pill comment or give me anything better than rape blah blah blah or church blah blah blah. You know you are full of shit.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 My wife and I have discussed this a couple years back, is she was to become pregnant again, and 8 months into the pregnancy, we found out the child was coming early but was almost guaranteed to live, but we had to choose her life or the babies. My wife would be the one to go. This is all about selfishness. Nothing to do with religion. It is not right to kill off a child because of financial reasons or fear. People just need to stop fucking everyone else.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@squiggnick
That was your CHOICE was it not? Whom are you to decide what other people can and cannot choose? Listen! I am no fan of abortion. But that does NOT give me the right to dictate what others can choose? Are you in a position of dictating to others how they shall run their lives?
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 We decide everyday what is right and wrong. Look at suicide, we have a law that dictates that one has committed a crime if they attempt suicide and fail. If a person assists in the aide of anothers suicide they have committed a crime, but yet if a whore wants to kill someone that doesn't have the ability to speak for themselves, it's ok. We create laws and amendments to the Constitution to govern what is just and unjust and therefore telling everyone how to live their lives.
squiggnick 9 months ago
Your whole basis of argument is nothing more than fake emotions and fake concern of the cells. Hell! You don't give a shit about the living! Yoiu want to FORCE a girl to have an unwanted fetus and give birth! You don't give a shit about poor kids and their having food on the table or have access to healthcare. Yhe only thing you care about is a collection of cluster cells, not for living kids whom have to sacrifice so that you RW Christian corporatists can have your tax breaks.
bohemianwriter1 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 A collection of cluster cells which would most assuredly become an adult human if given enough time. 99.9% of abortions have NOTHING to do with rape, most are performed on professional whores. You, my friend, obviously do not care about the sanctity of human life. "For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always." - John 12:8
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Yes, abortions are largely funded by government. Do some research. We pay taxes so whores can not take resposiblity for their own action, or because their parents will find out they were fucking at 15.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@jonnyy40
So you are not only anti choice for women, supporting a Big Government what a woman can and cannot do with her own body. Take your skyspook into the picture makes you RW anti liberty morons even more pathetic. Using a non existent "god" to support your anti liberty stance. On top of that, you are calling women whores. Way to stay classy! You are not a libertarian. You are just a RW moron whom wants to smoke weed and decide how others are living their lives...
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1
Ron Paul is not against gay marriage. He believes the government has no role whatsoever in defining marriage.
gilbertl2000 10 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 See, you are just another idiot. There is no such thing as separation of church and state. That is not in the Constitution, read that shit again. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" congress shall make no law on the belief of one religion or force a religion on someone neither shall it prohibit the free exercise of any religion. The Constitution should not be overly interpreted.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@squiggnick
Well you certainly have not read your Thomas Jefferson or Thomas Paine and their relationship to religion. "There should be a wall of separation between church and state". Which means that politics and religion should not mix. It's obvious you are of a different opinion that religion should interfere with politics with it's dogmas. You think that is Thomas Jeffersen actually meant when he tore out most of the bible pages and let only a few pages left?
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Is that quote in the Constitution?
squiggnick 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 And why does everyone that reads it verbatim have to be taking a religious standpoint. You are almost like a Salem witch hunter. OH HOLY SHIT, THAT PERSON DISAGREES, WITCH, THAT FUCKER'S A WITCH. You make me laugh. You're funny I think I'll call you.....Chubbles. What's really funny Chubbles is alot of the things and videos you have placed on your page, I agree with. I'll reply one more time to clarify.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 I believe that all drugs should be legal, less people would do them if people would quit saying even shit like pot is dangerous. If people want to do heroin and die from it, so be it, we will be better off. I believe the shit with Obama, the shit with Bush, with Osama, i agree, I even believe that we deserved what happened to our country because of what our country has done to theirs. None of which is a religious view.
squiggnick 9 months ago
@squiggnick
I understand that you want to criminalize sick people. All people whomtries to commit suicide are criminals in your eyesm and want to punish them. Is pot dangerous? Should one be treated as a criminal for smoking a plant? Isn't that a direct intervention of ones private lives?
I think your stance directly contradicts both Jefferson and George Washington. Both grew hemp, and George smoked it for teeth aches. Criminal by todays standards?
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Are you kidding me? I was simply making a statement. You are a very blind person. Blind to what is right/wrong, who to protect, and what people around you are actually saying. If you want to kill yourself, do the world a favor, and if you fail, I would only punish you for being too stupid to kill yourself. Pot isn't dangerous, neither is Salvia. As far as abortions go, maybe if women didn't spread their legs so much like whores, this wouldn't be an issue. But it is murder
squiggnick 9 months ago
@squiggnick
Well, yoy are making statements taken out of your own ass, thinking that your particular "values" of what people can do with their lives is somewhat more valiud than others, thinking you can impose those "values" onto others...
I also see that you have clear misogynic tendencies. Maybe tolerated in Saudi Arabia about women being whores, but here, you are just another rable rousing asshat...
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 And still disregard any and every statement that I make. I say something, you say I said something else, I explain it to you, you continue to go off of what you said that I said. You tell me I disagree with drugs and suicide, I explain it to you, you keep going. Instead of making an argument to what was said you continue to break people down into what you think they resemble. When can we move on to point and counterpoints???
squiggnick 9 months ago
@bohemianwriter1 Oh, and if we as a country didn't "impose" our "values" on others there would be no laws. Laws, rules, regulations, all a collective of someone's values to regulate the country. Should we do away with standards entirely? And I'm just so sorry that I expect women to hold themselves to a higher standard than to subject themselves to sex toys. Also you were looking for misogynistic not misogynic.
squiggnick 9 months ago
Again, you are for a Big Brother state! Wanna criminalize women who for one reason or another needs an abortion, pot smokers, gays, liberals and anyone whom do not adhere to your "values". Despite the fact that your values stink to hog heaven with nothing in commmon with liberalism or personal freedom. Like I said, "Libertarians" are just republicans whom wanst to smoke dope and get laid. Your "standards" belong in the 16th century. Except there was no punishment for smoking a plant back then.
bohemianwriter1 9 months ago 2
Gary Johnson has the relevent record, using the power of veto to tame spending. Paul not. Would use his power as CiC to bring the troops home (which sadly Obama hasn't done). Paul would. GJ is not an anti-woman barbarian. Paul is. And his free-market fundamentalism should appeal to donors (the privatisation nutters). Like Paul. Plus GJ got elected in a democratic state, that might carry the base in these times.
Johnson/Paul 2012 anyone? Real Republicans, Real Change?
RP/GJ = Unelectable.
MrBobbillo 10 months ago
mayby he is unelectable because a majority doesnt agree with him.
I really love how people think anyone needs to follow the advice some guyt gaved 300 years ago.
Mayby we in Sweden should do the same?
haha.
quezcatol 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@quezcatol "I really love how people think anyone needs to follow the advice some guy gaved 300 years ago."
Going by that comment, then why would billions of people today follow the advice of some guy or guys gave 2,000 years ago? Jesus and Mohammad? Maybe it's because thier advice is even more relevant today.
mickeysears 10 months ago
Bernanke holding a press conference is like having knife run thru you while being convinced it doesn't hurt!
TheeBudGuru 10 months ago
Yes. Next question.
mw2000 10 months ago
"Is Ron Paul Unelectable? "
A: -no-
ewingsco 10 months ago
All NWO puppets. Judge FAT HEAD is for now the NWO pot stirrer. Anyone on MSM channels is playing a part. The only real hope for AMERICANS IS DEATH US GOVERNMENT and representatives. State government is the only hope for the USA.
HeavyMetalPedal 10 months ago
Sorry Guys Ron Paul sadly is not going to win shit !
teddyinajapan 10 months ago
Media fails again Ron Paul has been elected 11 TIMES
metapatriot 10 months ago 41
@metapatriot You morons are pathetic, its pretty obvious that when they say Ron Paul can't win, they mean he can't win the Presidential Election you inbreds! And its true, Ron Paul will NEVER Win ANY Presidential race EVER! What is this like his 3rd run? I thinks its suffice to say that Ron Paul will NEVER win!
deeppurple28 9 months ago
@deeppurple28 Really? He can't win the Presidential Election?
Why?
He already has almost as many Voters ready to vote for him as Obama - feel free to look at the public polls.
The only thing that can hang him up is the Republican Nomination - but WE who were willing to register As Republicans to vote in the Primaries will support him there.
Once we get a debate with him vs Obama - Obama's backing will vanish, and Dr. Paul can easily win.
eslake 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul can win 2012! "Freedom Watch" did a long segment about how and why
/watch?v=3giGl8EXigI
vechorik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul can win President 2012!
"Freedom Watch" did a long segment about how and why
/watch?v=3giGl8EXigI
vechorik 4 months ago in playlist Ron Paul in the media 05/'10-04/'11
4 years ago the media didnt even mention Ron Paul!!!
this guy bows or whatever his name is, is a real idiot!!!
wdcsucks1 10 months ago 18
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul can win 2012!
"Freedom Watch" did a long segment about how and why
/watch?v=3giGl8EXigI
vechorik 4 months ago in playlist Ron Paul Related Pt.2
i wont vote for ron paul on the premise that, he is against equality of homosexuals, against a womans choice for abortion, wants to give states rights, and weaken the fed-government making it possible for a clusterfuck of statelaw-differentiation on many key subjects, making people forced to leave their states to other states to recieve what is considered illegal, his idea of balancing the economy is along the lines of ryan plan, and his views are against the constitution. hes a sham, a fake.
TheAtheistHominid 10 months ago
@TheAtheistHominid Actually you would be wrong about his views of gay equality. He is for equal footing. And he even questions the need for a marriage license. Also his main point about abortion is that it should be left up to the states but should not be federally funded.
watertonrivers 10 months ago
@TheAtheistHominid you have been mis-informed. While Ron Paul is against abortion, he doesn't want to impose his will on others. He would let individual states figure out this issue most likely. The only time he voted against abortion legislation is in the instance of partial birth, and he's not against it when the mother's life is in danger. (continued)
pmcdon02 10 months ago
@TheAtheistHominid (continued) On marriage, he doesn't want the government involved in straight marriage, never mind gay. If churches wanted to marry anyone, gay or straight, they should have the right to if they choose, and that married person is no different in the eyes of the state.
pmcdon02 10 months ago
@pmcdon02 I agree he once said recently.I live a very conservative life but I just don't want to force it on people by law.
RussMaxable 10 months ago
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself,
metapatriot 10 months ago
if ron paul actually got close enough to be a threat he would never survive long enough to see a day in the oval office. no one outside the round table will ever see the inside of that place.
MrRontree 10 months ago
@ufster81 Isn't Grevio the name of a Roman general? ;-)
GoodVibezin 10 months ago
@GoodVibezin
i think it's the name of a teenage cunt who is venting out his anger on youtube because he has sexual identity issues that he represses.
ufster81 10 months ago
WARNING watching television, causes the viewer’s brain waves to slip into a hypnotic, post-REM delta sleep in this state, any number of post-hypnotic suggestions can be implanted in the mind of the viewer Since television is such a powerful tool, and its existence is licensed and regulated by government, there will never be any objective, rational discussion of civil rights, or government scams and cons such as income tax or the Federal Reserve system explained in that broadcast medium.
metapatriot 10 months ago
again you act as though there are no bush's and hitler's in the world. remember that bug last year that reached 5 continents in like 2 weeks? imagine that being weaponized. such as the new H5N1 virus that kills 85% of its victims? you don't think there could be a culling of the population by the elite of the world that run the planet?
habibimaya 10 months ago
Ron Paul is NOT a libertarian: sandefur(.)typepad(.)com/freespace/2010/02/ron-paul-no-longer-pretending-to-be-a-libertarian.html
therealaj123 10 months ago
Ron Paul can't even run his own newsletter, let alone a country. He is incompetent at governing, a quality a lot of libertardians obviously find admirable.
therealaj123 10 months ago
Why is Ron Paul "unelectable"? Because of his age? Because he doesn't want public money to fund abortion? Because he wants to shut down the fake "Federal" Reserve? Why is Ron Paul unelectable, why? Someone tell me please!
Have we NEVER elected someone who was in their 70's to be President?
Have we NEVER elected someone for President that was against using public money to fund abortion? HAVE WE NEVER ELECTED SOMEONE WHO WANTED TO GIVE BACK CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY AND THE MONEY TO THE PEOPLE??
ionacaddy 10 months ago
Ron Paul is running because this is a great way to deliver his message, it's no surprise.
lestliness 10 months ago
a one world government? let me explain something to you that is pretty basic shit. a ship at sea has air tight separate compartments for a reason. so you can seal off a flooded part of the ship and stop the rest of ship from filling up with water. boundaries act the same way for nations. this keeps the hitler's of the world confined. one world gov't cannot work for this simple reason. they want to ban all resistance and call them terrorists. terrorists have no rights in our country.
habibimaya 10 months ago
My two favorites...
LilChewieee 10 months ago
we haven't had a truly free market since early 20th century.
habibimaya 10 months ago
only if he dilutes his unregulated market views
harj2009 10 months ago
Democrats and independents should register Republican for a few months just to vote for Paul. The GOP establishment would hate it if he won. It would be worth it just to see them squirm come election season.
Scipio2021 10 months ago 9
@Scipio2021
%100 agree, love Paul or hate him any concerned citizen needs to be voting in Republican primaries if they don't want Romney or Palin because I tell you who is unelectable is Obomber.
My most unbiased assessment I don't see how he has any path other than fraud and rigging to re-election.
He dropped 10 points the day after he had the nomination secure for that FISA vote.
BadSwineDOTcom 10 months ago
@BadSwineDOTcom There's so many issues Paul will bring up that your usual corporatist GOP candidate will not.
Scipio2021 10 months ago
Ron Paul is the only one who IS electable!
Livefreerevolution 10 months ago
THIS 'NOT ELECTABLE' BULLSHTI IS THE IS ALL ABOUT IMPLANTING A CONCEPT ,HOWEVER WRONG,AND THE RETARDED...CONFORMIST AMERICAN PUBLIC...SO UNABLE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES...WILL RUN AROUND REPEATING IT OVER AND OVER...PERFECT SENARIO-ALL THE TV WATCHING SHIT HEADS PUBLIC ATTACK AND EAT THE ELITES...GET SICK AND DIE...WE EXPERIENCE A RENASSAINCE....GET THE ELITES GOLD AND STOLEN TECHNOLOGY....NIRVANA!!!
treon123456 10 months ago
The only way we can get this man elected is to spread the word. Talk about the good of Ron Paul, talk to your friends, your family, your neighbors, your co-workers. Talk to everyone you can get them to look into Ron Paul and try to get them to tell 2 other people.
Garlannd 10 months ago
How, in the name of Christ, is Ron Paul "not electable". If he is truely not electable it is only because the neo-cons and commies in the media have repeated that statement a trillion times. You know they say that repetitive slogans are the most basic form of mind control.
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@Grevlo you are not a liberal. you are a troll. i like how you determined that i'm a 'hippie' based on the 5 words i said to you.
supercomputer12 10 months ago
growing support for gay marriage? LOL
dragnet53 10 months ago
Primaries definately harder than the general election for either Paul or Johnson...I am against our voting system and parties in general but I am registered as a Republican. It causes me no harm (no for the past 5 years anyway) and lets me vote (in PA) in the primaries. Please consider the same measure yourself.
herzogsbuick 10 months ago
RON PAULS GONNA WOOOP THEIR ASSES IN THE DEBATES....THAT WHEN PPL WILL SEE...HOW GREAT A LEADER HE COULD BE...
treon123456 10 months ago
Propaganda works on most people; statistically it probably works on you! The only way to overcome it is to learn about it. Please educate yourself on all forms of propaganda. Don't assume you know enough about it.
PLEASE & Thank you.
TheHardMoneyMan 10 months ago
it smells fishy..
basicaly the message of that clip is:
"Ron Paul is too old and cannot win, vote for the other dude... they are the same thing you'll see"... But we know they're not . stay focus!
rrrNEWS 10 months ago
@rrrNEWS
that's pretty much the usual treatment of ron paul by the mainstream press. i don't adhere to capitalist libertarian positions, but the reality is ron paul is not shoved aside because he is a libertarian, calling for lower taxes and smaller government, but because he wants to put an end to the imperial foreign policy of the united states, which means a lot of lost money for the likes of GE and fox news financiers.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 It also means a lot of resources that the U.S. doesn't get so cheap anymore, that when we buy these resources, we'll be funding terrorism. It means that Iran will get nukes and cause an arms race. That's the last thing we need at this point in the world.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
us did get oil cheaper before it was involved in the iraq war or the middle eastern matters for that reason. the price of a barrel of oil in 2000 was around 35 usd and since the war, on average of 80+ usd per barrel.
you see, wars and weapons don't create stability you little troll, they stifle economies and destroy productivity, whatever your means of production are, capitalist or communist.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 Well then I guess we shouldn't allow Iran to get nukes if weapons are so bad.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
well, you can start getting rid of your own nukes and pressure israel to get rid of theirs... nuclear proliferation is not a one sided policy where you get to keep yours and tell everyone else to get rid of theirs, especially when you are developing "tactical nukes" that you claim to be usable in the battlefield...
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 Well the U.S. is civilized and not muslim extremists. I can't believe you assholes are always comparing the U.S. to Iran. It's sickening.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
us used two nuclear bombs on civilians... that is not being civilized you fucking cunt. and yes, there is no comparison, iran hasn't fought an aggressive war for the past 300 years, period.
you're a clueless moron.
ufster81 10 months ago
@Grevlo
well, anymore genius arguments there, dumbass ? i don't have much time to waste on an ignorant, bitter 15 year old who has no clue about the world.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 You're just an anti-war pussy who doesn't see the point in what the U.S. does. just a liberal pussy. have a good day fag.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo ad hominem attacks: conservative specialty.
supercomputer12 10 months ago
@Grevlo
you're just a closet homosexual who is projecting your repressed sexual feelings for your classmates onto the world by acting like a warmongering tough guy. yeah, there is one of you teens in every youtube video acting macho and calling people liberal pussies. it goes to show why you would call people pussies, since you hate pussies so much, don't you.
ufster81 10 months ago
@Grevlo sickens me too. There's only one state psycho enough to have ever used nukes in war, you can't compare with that.
educution 10 months ago
@educution what are you a fucking pacifist? please fucking kill yourself
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
do you understand the irony in asking a pacifist to kill himself ?
were you always this stupid or did they do some kind of experiments on you to remove the evil part of your brain and accidentally removed the part which is responsible for rational thinking so you ended up being both stupid and mean spirited ?
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 Suicide doesn't have to be violent. douche. You're the one who doesn't understand that we're all running out of natural resources and that we're going to die if we continue to live this way. Governments need to unite and find solutions. We cant have muslim extremist assholes in this world. They refuse to take part in modern civilization. They are scum and so are you.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo Then why don't you do us all a favor and kill yourself??
WorshipInTruth 10 months ago
@Grevlo
yeah dude, death is never violent, except that you die... which is in itself an act of violence, towards your conscious being that you put an end to, you dumb cornholio.
look, if you're so concerned about the survival of others, why don't you eliminate yourself first ? you'll be saving us plenty of resources by not taking up any of our time and effort which can be placed constructively elsewhere. right now, you're just inhibiting the rest of us.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 wow, no substance.... and death isn't always violent. what a dumb cunt you are.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
death itself is violent. it puts an end to your conscious being, period. this the ultimate harm a human beings existence can suffer.
what a dumb little bitch you are.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 ..............please rethink the suicide thing, because that comment was so fucking stupid that I'M about to kill myself. and by the way, nice job dodging my point earlier. you know damn well that i'm right, but you choose to ignore it and stick to your ron paul douchebaggery.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
you can't even read a fucking dictionary so in behalf of all rational people of this world, please do kill yourself, you'll be making a huge contribution to the future generations by significantly increasing the average IQ of the human population..
merriam-webster -> violent: caused by force : not natural (as in the case of suicide)
violence -> undue alteration
what a moron you are.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 Ok, so then I'm VIOLENTLY typing, I'm VIOLENTLY moving my mouse. i mean that's just plain stupidity. And why don't you address my comment from before, about our natural resources? you completely dodged it.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
how is typing not natural you fucking moron ?
how is moving your mouse not natural you fucking moron ?
i mean you are plain stupid if you can't grasp the notion that violent (caused by force, not natural) death as in the case of suicide (self applied, not natural) is not remotely connected with the acts of moving your mouse or typing on your keyboard, you moronic dipshit ?
you haven't made a point because you haven't provided any evidence for your claim that war is a solution.
ufster81 10 months ago
@Grevlo @ufster81
Hey FGTS take your slap fight somewhere else, may I suggest a TPMTV video. Were trying to have a rational conversation about the contrasting views of Libertarianism & Marxism and how they could be implemented and would apply to a modern society.
BadSwineDOTcom 10 months ago
@BadSwineDOTcom
i think my motive of humiliating through brutal education a warmongering bitch is a more noble cause than you discussing marxism... is that ok with you ?
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 brutal education? you completely ignored my comment before. you're ignoring the issues and explaining the definition of violence to me. plleeeeeeease dude fucking pleeeease.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
"you're ignoring the issues" sounds just like someone who has a hard time explaining the issues, perhaps because he doesn't know the first thing about "the issues". go fucking play with your toys, you moron.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 I'm shocked that you're still not responding to my comment? Is this you accepting defeat? what a pathetic little troll you are.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
i just did you fucking moron... heard of refresh ?
ufster81 10 months ago
@BadSwineDOTcom i just said bye. he's a fucking retard who doesn't address the issues
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
Stop trolling. You fail at it.
fonkymaster 10 months ago
@fonkymaster I'm just telling the truth.
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
By calling people faggots, liberal pussies and telling them to go die? No, you are a troll.
you remind me of Friction.
fonkymaster 10 months ago
@fonkymaster he was being a bitch. what do you expect me to say?
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
If you weren't trolling in the first place, that would have not happened.
Basic cause and effect.
fonkymaster 10 months ago
@fonkymaster loll i don't really remember so i really can't say anything
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
you had no point earlier but to shout "islamic extremism and death to the non-infide"l...
yeah, addressing that would require me to call the mental institution and reserving you a nice room with a view.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 K your violent suicide argument is a waste of time cuz you're a fucking idiot. again, not addressing my argument. goodbye. fucking waste of life
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
i proved my case you fucking moron. suicide is a form of violent death... you have no arguments against it except for calling me names and arguing it's a waste of time, which goes to show you're a fucking moron for insisting on an argument with which you were both wrong and deliberately wasting my time.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 stop talking about suicide. it's a waste of time. i'm still waiting for you to address my comment on the environment and politics. you're trying to distract me with the argument on suicide (that you're having with yourself btw).
Grevlo 10 months ago
@Grevlo
well, if it was a waste of time, you shouldn't have insisted on wasting my time getting schooled on the topic. maybe you just like being pwned.
your argument on politics and environment is a non-sequitur, an argument which the premise is unrelated with the conclusion. we can be perfectly self sufficient and environmentally sustaining within nation states or even smaller political entities so a global solution is not a necessary one.
ufster81 10 months ago
@ufster81 "we can be perfectly self sufficient and environmentally sustaining within nation states". ummm no, wrong, absolutely wrong. We're going to keep fighting and keep growing in population. The world is not going to work together on this because of competition between nations, and greed. Our population ALONE is unsustainable. The only way to live sustainably is if we have one government. That way there is no war, and competition between nations. The people can be spoken to without conflict
Grevlo 10 months ago