Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,697)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • take another pp poll mancow... your conclusions are felonious.

  • "he would like to start a war with iran" and the headline says he would consider it... blantant example of com mie bias...

  • Maddow thinks the Democrats are anti-war. LMFAO! Ron Paul is the only candidate from EITHER party that will stop the wars and bring the troops home. End of story.

  • @goodbyetroll I agree, both parties are the same. They both blow all our money and will go to war to try and prevent Iran from seeking an alternative to Our Nixon initiated petro dollar cartel.

    Iran has begun trading oil for gold with India, That is our reason not a nuclear Iran. If we had sanctions against us like we're imposing on them we would be outraged.

  • Is Maddow a man or a woman? Or both?

  • Ron Paul 2012

  • Comment removed

  • Well, I think that chances are very little for this Ron Paul bloke to get elected is very little and even if he would get elected he would be sooner dead than this Irish fool - what was his name? Kennedy I think - because the Baron does not like to have his cashing state ands military rendered ineffective; if this would happen folk all around the world would refuse to pay their debts and interests and start introducing gold currencies as the late Libyan ruler; so no chance for poor Paul.

  • Iran has one of the richest oil reserves in the world and we must have it. Nothing will stand in the way of the US and European BANKERS. They stoled Libya's 90 tons of GOLD.

  • When Biden was in congress he made the statement mark my words in the next ten years you will vote on Vchip technology. Little did people know that was hidden in the Obamacare bill. He has also written a paper on the NEW WORLD ORDER. We elect such good people or did we

  • And not talking... like Nancy Reagan & Laura Bush's Mother in law, Barbara had wanted... "like she... she just ...talks " :) :) :) lol 2003 on up.

  • I pray and so snake was granted to me ... so I would not doubt

    who (a Terrorist Head of Nation/Iran) it was I was seeing and was

    able to deal with it more effectively.

  • Ahmadinejad went by me, driving, in Akron NY.

    A rural road.

    Buell (Rte 93 I think it is) and very close to the Crossroad MainStreet, Clarence or Akron.

    Common road for those travelling to that Indian Reservation for purchases of cigarettes, gas, etc. Meals pretty good, things to buy available, snacks & tourist type/Indian type items....

    On the right side is a Cath. church and a field right before Cath. Church. Nice as well. In field had been a snake (lrg and coiled) wi/its head up & looking.

  • Rachel Maddow is just the most recent incarnation of Gozer, sometimes referred to as Gozer the Destructor, Gozer the Traveler, etc.

    This image will clear things up: tinypic com/view.php? pic=28qv5i&s=5

  • Ron paul 2012

  • I love Romney OR Obama because their going to start WW3 & you wont have to worry about it anymore. Which means the military industrial complex that Rachel Maddow is actually working for will have it's way. When WW3 starts you can thank Rachel Maddow & all the other talking heads that promotes all the unjust that obama has done. If Bush would've done half the bullshit that obama did. OMG just imagine what all the queers would be saying. Obama has committed war crimes there's PROOF all over Utube

  • Just like Communists are fringe Democrats.

  • I like Ron Paul. But Maddow has it wrong. Many Republicans think we should cut and run out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Most now realize it was a bad idea and poorly conceived.

    There are different wings of both parties.

    She is referring to fringe Republicans.

  • @StonewallJackson26 she's referring to those particular candidates...she had it right

  • the poor fight and sacrifice in the rich man's war.

    Support Ron Paul !!!

  • The world is gone mad.

  • Cheney is an out-and-out demon.

    REGISTER

    REGISTER

    REGISTER

    VOTE

    VOTE

    VOTE

    RON PAUL 2012

  • ya rachel you must be proud of biden and obama, why arent you reporting that obama just said that nothing is off the table with respect to iran? and dont forget oh bias one, that it took obama a 2nd term election to finally finish the troop withdrawl, which isnt real anyway because theyre replacing the troops with private contractors. whats worse?

  • The industrialists and bankers are like Brer Rabbit in the Uncle Remus stories and Ron Paul is like the briar patch. You're supposed to believe that the industrialists and bankers, who along with Nazi post-war factions in the US created the John Birch Society that Alex Jones comes from, are screaming, "Please, please don't throw me into that briar patch!" as if Paul would end the FED; and they've always wanted to end social investment and put the currency back on the gold standard.

  • the title is misleading, she says republican candidate not just candidate

  • $20 she's going to get fired from msnbc for speaking the truth.

  • That BITCH did a hit piece on Ron Paul recently - she is not even trying to hide that fact that she is part of the system - fucking lowlife CUNT

  • @Moreofthesamez A hit piece... you mean about the delegates? That was her being ignorant/dumb, not her being evil. She admitted she was wrong too. nothing compared to the other hits Ron Paul has been taking, but still she should have been less personal until she did her homework

  • ron paul must know he will never be president

  • @merckxtallica if not its only because you believe that and wont vote for him because limbaugh and the mainstream keep saying that over and over again... if no one kept saying that and the sheep like you wouldnt listen and repeat it, he would win and your life would be more free and better off.

  • Truth is on a roll. It' s gonna be a rocky road .If the repubs don;t take him .I ll write him in .RP 2012

  • vote 'im up!

  • Dr. Ron Paul 2012

  • This clown is still on the air?

    wow

  • "Dick Cheney said we should have dropped a bomb on Iran last week"

    I love how she said that. She sounds annoyed yet slightly humored.

  • @ZebIsSporadic You probably also loved that cute little gift Iran sent us a few weeks ago: A perfect miniature of our drone that crashed there. It was patronizing, disrespectful, and indicative of their future plans for us…but humorous.

  • Think for yourself people and do your research. I used to love Rachel Maddow and was convinced she was the most accurate reporter until I got TEVO. Why TEVO you ask? Because I started to record her episodes as well as the people she talks bad about all the time like Glen Beck, Hannity, Oreilly, Rush etc and I was amazed. She lies almost every episode about what others have said. I'm sorry I have no respect for a liar and hugely exaggerating is still lying. I don't watch her anymore now.

  • not to be contentious, but if RP were in office that would be no guarantee the 'war machine' wouldnt pull another 9/11 (et al). face it, the cia has been running things from behind scenes since jfk (and before). addressing the real problems head on is the only logical path.

  • @vengencefrom1979 Yeah, there is no guarantee, but let's remember it was the government's inefficiencies that allowed 9/11 to happen. There was plenty of information available that terrorists were planning to do it, but it kept getting shot down at high levels. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer is a friend of mine, and he was one of the main people spear heading the investigation. Wikipedia his name, and get his thoughts. Don't trust me.

  • @rahulk552008 to me it isnt the fact that there were warnings, to me it was bush covering it up for 7 years and launching two wars because of it. 9/11 - inside job! george bush - TRAITOR! watch wtc7 sometime and try to tell me different.

  • @vengencefrom1979 I'll agree the 9/11 story is fishy but I'm not ready to believe in controlled demolition theories. There is a good bit of counter-evidence, so it's likely there were other factors involved we aren't aware of, aside from the evidence we do have. However, I will agree the US government has definitely earned the title "suspect" and should be investigated.

  • @rahulk552008 There is all kinds of conclusions that the pilots were "out on the town" the night before the attacks. Knowing their mission but not exactly it's conclusion. It would certainly be also interesting to know O.B.L was a C.I.A operative as well during the Afghan war w/ the Soviet Union. Makes one wonder.....

  • @vengencefrom1979

    "but if RP were in office that would be no guarantee the 'war machine' wouldnt pull another 9/11"

    All of that needs FUNDING & RESOURCES, can he be killed, may be...BUT that's why it'd be naive to rely on one man; REAL CHANGE will only come when PEOPLE embrace ideas of liberty so I'd urge to spread that so that people understand what it means & be more aware & hold govt responsible - /watch?v=psV6pOsW9YY

    Just my opinion, spread liberty instead of Conspiracies

  • if we sent our leaders to the wars they start there would be no wars newt mitt rick and obama were to scaired to serve in the military when it was their turn and if we made them go now there would be no wars they were cowards before and they would be cowards now they are only brave when they stand behind the military they turned their back on lets send them and end the wars

  • I hear people say that weve been in bad spots before.You need to get your head out of the sand.America is SO young and were interjecting amongst people that have been fighting HARD for millenia.We will be but a brief footnote is history, THE FAILED INDEPENDENCE PROJECT.We had a couple good wins and we thought we could just kick out feet up and do nothing.When you feel safe you forget that you were ever afraid in the first place,why any of you feel safe...I cannot comprehend.

  • Comment removed

  • Where do I begin?I dont know when people stopped reading The Art of War but pulling your troops out is not a success(any man thats reading this should be ashamed that a woman is schooling them in this, war is a mans game)its a failure, its a loss, and no one batted an eyelash.We cry everytime an enemy civilian dies,the word civilian casualty exists for a reason, what has happened to us as a country, as a people.We used to be so strong but now the rifts are bigger than ever (cont)

  • @cyrene13 "There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare."

    -from The Art of War

  • @homomo10 Typical American thinking...a decade is not a long time to fight a war...1000 years is a long time to fight a war.

  • @cyrene13 Yoy shouldn't fight a war with no money

  • @cyrene13 A decade's a long time if you are one of the casualties of that war in that decade-long war or you are the mother worrying if her son will make it home alive and in one piece. It also helps to know why we are there - more active military support Ron Paul than ALL other candidates combined, including the Nobel Peace Prize winner who is itching to get us into another decade long war in Iran .

  • @doogleandalix Wars are a political thing, not a personal thing.Theyre fought for money,power,and land and have been since the beginning of mankind.Every war has casualties and every war leaves parents outliving their children,not just this one.And there has never been a war in this country that has not been protested;there have always been people like you who think that 7 billion violent animals can get along without having to kill eachother.Deal with it,this is just how the world works.

  • @cyrene13 I don't care if Middle Easterners can't get along with each other - let them all kill each other for all I care - I just don't agree that we should be there fighting their battles. Tell the casualties that it is not a personal thing -ask the active military if they agree with you - I doubt it . They want to come home where they belong . We are not the global police force and I have no idea why we are there - to make Pentagon contractors rich?Have you served or lost anyone in a war ?

  • @doogleandalix Regardless of what you want, we are in the Middle East and have been for such a time that apologizing and leaving is no longer an option.Instead of wishing for a different past you should be thinking of a future that involves the fewest casualties on your side.And I dont need to tell any soldier about sacrifices he may have to make.There is no draft and for you to make it sound like they ere dragged kicking and screaming is pretty disrespectful.

  • @cyrene13 I don't think it's disrespectful at all . Watching youtube videos, I see a lot of soldiers who went voluntarily into the military believing they were there for a good cause .Now that they are in the Middle East,they see that there is an agenda and we should never have gone in the first place . We have been in bed with the Middle East for years - funding them and dropping a lot of $ that never goes to the right people .Apologizing & leaving is no longer an option ? Really ?

  • @doogleandalix Every one of those men and women serving this country is doing so because they decided to.And who are you to decide what is best for this country.How well informed do you really think you are?I hear and read all these absolute statements.Statements,never questions, about who is getting money from whom or what.Statements born mostly from some poweroint "documentary" about how Bush was the worst president ever,which; unless you know about every president you cant say.

  • @doogleandalix Are you really surprised people make money off wars, has the term war profiteering never caressed your ear drum?You must live in the world of the Historical Drama, where people like George Washington, and Abraham Lincoln are portrayed as pillars of society, not men that were willing to destroy anything or anyone that got in their way, they solved problems with bullets,not diplomacy.If someone wants you or your country dead,destroy them first.End of story.

  • @cyrene13 No,I'm not surprised people make $ out of war but I don't want the US to be known as a country who has been at ware for the better part of 70 yrs - we have no industry left here . NAFTA took care of that and no mfg base equals poverty for most of us - it's all a matter of time. Many join the military because there are no jobs,future looks bleak.And profiteers make millions and at what price ? Russia had nukes during the Cold War but Kennedy did not rush to war - smart man.

  • @homomo10 okay, maybe thats a little extreme...200 years

  • Wow - Rachel Maddow is HOTTTT! I wonder if she has a boyfriend.....

  • I believe her name is spelled Madcow.

  • NO WAR FOR OIL IN IRAN

  • Ron Paul 2012

    Ron Paul 2016

    Rand Paul 2020

  • We must go to war with Iran! Iran poses a HUGE threat to the US. Just look at the 2010 Iranian military expenditures! $7,044,000,000 !! The US was only $687,105,000,000 THAT'S 98 TIMES IRAN'S MILITARY SPENDING.

  • @03SilverMustangGT

    that's what they said about Iraq

  • Is this a guy or a girl? Sounds like a girl, but looks like a guy.

  • You got the quote wrong in the title. Insert "Republican" before the word Presidential.

  • war is big profit for the 1%

  • @macrochronic actually the 1% of the 1% of the 1% war is big profit for the them IMO.

  • @macrochronic I think you mean "war is big profit for some of the 1%". The top 1% pay more taxes than the bottom 95%. Unless you own a bomb factory you're pretty much stuck with the bill.

  • @cdoftx But they would still be in the top 1% after tax otherwise they wouldn't be the top 1%! lol

  • @cdoftx i think i mean what i said

  • @macrochronic Then you're wrong. I totally that these wars are ridiculous and expensive, but take the CEO of Facebook. In their recent IPO bureaucrats were salivating over what to do with the taxes they'll get. He doesn't profit from the war, he just pays for it.

  • @macrochronic World always been around that1%, they were called aristocrats before now they are called corporates. Utopia can exists only in ideal world

  • How many time has Ron Paul ran for president? How can he still afford to roun after he has lost so much... I know the saying goes "Try try try again... but in his case, lets don't and say we did huh?

  • Comment removed

  • @SolgarTheDestroyer Well, that's what she's saying. Her line would read like this, "Ron Paul is the only Republican presidential candidate who dissents from that view. Who doesn't say, 'Let's not start another war, and let's not end the Iraq war either.'"

  • @a7x1337 yeah you're right . I listened to that part once again. Tricky English :)

  • I wish Ms Maddow would see this post. I would ask her to do an expose on 1st amendment protections for our press. They have a duty to INFORM the public. Not SHAPE the political will. The mainstreams intentional distortion of Ron Paul's belief's. The amount of airtime they give Doc. Paul's detractors like Trump. The way keep The elderly un / misinformed is a breach of contract with we the people. Election RIGGING is illegal. and An ACT OF WAR against America. So SAYS THE CONSTITUTION. GO READ IT

  • @saintron60 Isnt it freedom of speech, Shes a commentator, she give opinion you dont like it dont listen...

    

  • @saintron60 i think this american election will prove to the people how corrupt the american government is when ron paul mysteriously does not win haha

  • @saintron60 yeah you're right, but realistically she'd only get herself fired.

  • @saintron60 The same Maddow that did assassination pieces on Ron Paul, accusing him of being a racist? The same Maddow that did a similar assassination on Rand Paul over his remarks on the Civil Rights Act? The same Maddow that engages in precisely the 1st amendment abuse you speak of?

    She is only sucking up to him now because she wants to show how ludicrous the GOP is, with infighting.

  • Err, if you compare Ron Paul with Democrats(Obama), he would lose on every foreign policy issue too. Obama is PRO war, PRO Patriot Act, Pro NDAA, etc etc if you fuckheads on MSNBC haven't figured it out yet, which while i do admit they are stupid, they aren't THAT stupid.

  • Is it possible that Maddow is no longer selling out to the establishment? I'll keep my comments to myself and see if she is for real or not

  • Sex Ed ?

  • rachel needs to get rid of her ear piece...why can't she ever debate anyone who actually knows the issues... all of the guests on msnbc are obviously cherry picked .....fox challenges all !

  • @jimshortsfull Because Fox does not cherry pick? Dude, I got news for you: every TV station cherry pick their debater. Why? Because you don't want a debate on the economical implication of a news war with Glenn Beck, Beavis, Butthead, Hulk Hogan & Scarlett Johansson.

    Plus, the liberal on Fox News are all "weak" liberal or anti-establishment know persona. Similar with MSNBC (weak conservative)... When is the last time you seen Chomsky or Sheldon Wolin on the news?

  • We haven't left Iraq, Maddow is a corporate owned hack demonstrated by this simple statement of untruth that has dramatic consequences leading to more death of men women and children plundering of sovereign nations resources, empire and our tax dollars further enslaving us. She is despicable and not a true liberal but a deceiver. Expose these liars.

  • @moontooth We have now!

  • @John3285 Private Military Contractors? U.S. Embassy? No we haven't left. It doesn't take that long, do an internet search the facts are out there. God Bless.

  • @moontooth You are correct, but I was referring to the December 31st withdrawal of American Troops, Those other things/people will never leave. Also America has embassies in lots of countries its not at war with, like mine for instance!

  • ..Still in the running along with Goldman Sachs Mitt Ronmey or Newt "Freddie Mac and Mae" Gingrich. Ron Paul 2012. Remember, all the candidates "want war" but only Ron Paul and Perry have served. So those who "have fought" don't want useless wars, but those who "haven't", still want war to profit off dead America soldiers aka the poor and middle class. If war mongering lobbyst want war, grab a gun and go yourselves. But as we learned from ABC article "which son is the Prettiest Romney boy".

  • Wow. Respect.

  • Comment removed

  • One of the main reasons they don't teach it is due to the fact their are too many religions to cover and they can not cover all of them. As such the ones they did teach would become the equivelent of religions the government supported.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!! wake up people google ron paul! stop watching fox!!!!

  • War is what you do when you dont know what to do.

  • Comment removed

  • OMG a liberal isnt bashing ron paul for once??!!!

  • WAR LOVERS watch this video. warning you might change your view about war

    watch?v=ce1nghxpGvM

    than watch this one

    watch?v=pcpg9e2JXT0

  • Fuck Dick Cheney.

  • What is it with the US and war? Why can't this country be without war for at least a few years? It's like a fever or something. Not just politicians but the whole population loves war. Weird...

  • @TWSceptic No. Not all of us like war. Please don't believe that. 

  • I do not see how wanting pure capitalism and encouraging fair competition is a liberal idea?

    Simply put I believe government should minimize its interaction with business and interfere with business only in issues I consider absolutely essential. For example a grave issue would be businesses dumping their waste in our drinking water.

    I am against big federal government and big military and I am for capitalism so I am defiantly not liberal.

  • Like if you you want Ron Paul for 2012!

  • We can't all get it right all the time. Rachel Maddow gets it for now. Let's give credit where credit is due. Ron Paul is the only anti-war candidate—in ANY party. And the Republican field isn't even bothering to pretend to want a humble foreign policy, the rest all want war with Iran. We should ALWAYS be war-weary, but especially after this much war. LET'S BE DONE!

  • This woman is nuts. Maybe muliple personalties. Ron Paul 2012!

  • When I smell liberty I know it. As Americans we need to help the only man that believes in truth to power.

  • The RP supporters on this page don't seem to understand a very basic idea. A person does not have to be for or against someone to say good or bad things about them. When RP does something right you can say that he did something right no matter your overall feelings about him. Similarly you can criticise someone you generally like. If you can't find something to criticise or praise about every single person running for office, you are not thinking you are just a knee jerk partisan.

  • @michalchik dude you are making too much sense for the Paultards to comprehend, they demonized anyone who criticize Ron Paul like a cult, it is sickening, Paulbots are not friends of Progressives

  • lol Rachel Maddow. what a joke, can't wait til RP's elected and you lose your job.

  • Obama is the Commander right? The problems going on now with Iran are his doing. What is he doing at all...sanctions, troops to Israel? Why does the media pose it to us like its a left/right thing? Ron Paul!

  • Rachel maddow rubs his big cock when he thinks about Ann Coulter

  • Israel has stated many times recently that they can handle Iran. Let them.

  • "He's the only REPUBLICAN presidential candidate[...]" That's an important distinction.

  • :|

    *takes a good glance at Rachael*

    .....

    *takes a glance at self in the mirror*

    ...the fuck?

  • ron paul 2012.

  • GWB (moron) administration had an agreement with Iraq that the United States would withdraw troops by dec 2011, this was not something Obama decided, it was decided before Obama became president. he is taking credit for something that was already agreed upon by the United States and Iraq.

  • Rachel Maddow's mouth always runs like a huge broken commercial sewer line. And her breath smells even worse. The wacky lesbian needs to give up and go home to her lover.

  • btw just saw on rachel maddox show ..obama announce cuts to military .> good move . he's trying to cut ron pauls momentum / the revolution off before the big push . new hampshire >. cant be ignored by msm now can he? so obama strikes early . .> you know big "O" is bullshitting ., NDAA, need i say more> same crimes (bush) smaller military> stratergy ...i love that word... anyway, maddow is suspect also> roll the dice US of A, we're gonna need some luck here

  • If we signal that we will not defend Israel, we're inviting Iran and others to fall on them. We've been saying many will die when we leave Iraq prematurely. The mainstream media suddenly stopped counting the bodies.

  • @mexseiko Did none of you see the Prime Minister of Israel 4 months ago here in the States, he made a crucial speech, part of it was " we do not need America to teach us democracy, we live it. We do not need American soldiers defending us, we defend our own country" what else do you need to hear? what the hell is wrong with you people? yes be allies, trade etc.. when needed congress will decide and declare war when necessary. we have lost our marbles!!

  • @Tina196712 Director of the Mossad

  • Tina196212 It's too tall for you to understand. God said: I'll bless them who bless you and curse them who curse you. I.e.: Bush pushed Israel to evict people from West Bank. We found ourselves rescuing people from Katrina almost simultaneously with the eviction. We voted for a Jew Hater, wee will go bankrupt.

  • @Tina196712 This must've been in response to Obama criticism of Israel and talking down to them. Most of the time when Israel is under threat and ready to retaliate the US tells them to stand down, because if they respond hell may brk loose and US may have to break something. Israel hasn't bombed Iran yet for this reason, but are getting ready.

  • Iran is the world's cancer. If we don't cut it off, it will eat us alive. We prosecute the minimum hate speach in this country, but will tolerate death threats from a country building nukes.

  • @mexseiko

    That's right attack them before they attack you, after all you already have your 200,000,000 nukes

  • @chrispoole1 We're a threat to no one. Only to the aggressor. We defend our allies, our interests, and our people. We oppress no one and have liberated more people than you can count. You don't like it? Make your move.

  • @mexseiko

    Hi, I'm not against America, but in helping the allies etc.. Cost serious money and If you attack Iran you will go bankrupt and that will leave you open to more trouble at home from who knows what.

  • @chrispoole1 If youre not for her, you're against her. If we don't stop Iran now, it'll cost ten times more later.

  • @mexseiko really is that so? so when Iran in 1953 had a democracy, why did united states go in get rid of the ELECTED leader and place a dictator instead? justify this asswipe.

  • @Tina196712 It was another time w many challenges. US had a handful coming out of WWII with the Russians who were all over Iran. The democratically elected leader was fridly to Communism and wanted to nationalize an American oil company. It was a bad move, but like I said, it was another time. The Ayatollahs and Ahmadinejad are a clear and present danger to our nation. Inaction can prove fatal. Need 1953 glasses to judge actions. Hindsight 20/20.

  • politiek is mooi pratery veel woorden beloftes weinig wol ze beloven maar als hier holland uiteindelyk volgen ze hun belyd hun visie soms is war nodig om irak te stoppen making nuclair weapons voor de rest vind ik moeten ze zonder hulp usa het zelf uitvechten heet volk is heetgebakerd ihatewarangelxxx

  • Smart Americans flee from your country while you still can. Before hell breaks loose.

  • it annoys me that maddow thinks the war has ended in iraq, and that she believes the democratic president isn't picking a fight with tehran! maddow is either stupid or dishonest! the mainstream from both parties want war, period!

  • It feels surreal to be in agreement with Rachel Maddow. Wouldn't that be incredible if people who voted for Obama in the last election start to understand how dangerous he is for our country and vote for Ron Paul??? That could be a landslide election. But that would really freak out the establishment who wants either Obama or Romney, obviously...

  • What this jerk won't mention is that RP is not just the only Republican candidate who doesn't want to start yet another war, he's the ONLY presidential candidate that doesn't want to start another war.

    Obama is just a continuation of Bush's neocon foreign policy. And those who vote for him have just as much blood on their hands as those who voted for Bush's 2nd term.

  • @Amy31415 Signalling unwillingness to respond militarily is worse than playing Russian roulette. Lowering defence budget while Iran continues to threads nukes is spectacular stupidity. Most of the Old War was conducted by diplomacy and bluff. Even animals use bluff as defence mechanism. We just lower our guard and our pants.

  • @mexseiko

    Unless you're willing to actually go to Iran on your own dime and risk your own life and kill innocent Iranians to attain your goal, you're just another chickenhawk.

  • @Amy31415 These stupid names mean nothing to me. Liberal big government, repressive regulations and out of control social programs are banrupting the nation and the we will hand it our nemies.

  • @mexseiko Wow, seriously? Trillions wasted on war and unnecessary tax cuts, and your solution is to fuck the poor over and let big business do whatever the fuck it wants? That's insane dude.

  • 3ssay Damn ri