one fixed pulley moving a sliding pulley, decreasing the load by half. If you had two pulleys(fixed) to the sliding pulley(attatched to the weight) would the decrease in Newtons ever be less than half? Thank You.
Hi I got a problem dealing with windmill lifting up a weight that is 6.5 Kg. i have to build a windmill that could lift 6.5 Kg weight up to 0.75 meters up. How would you do it?
It is difficult to lift a heavy filing cabinet onto a truck. Take a ramp with a 30 degree slope, tilt the cabinet back toward the truck, to the point of balance and then just gently rock it up the ramp. One man job!
work in cant be equal to work out. it may theoretically true but not practically...such machines are ideal or perfect machines which doesn't exist in real sense
I understood the science behind the pulley and how the mechanical advantage is achieved, but the wedge? not so much. How can you have a mechanical "advantage" of 2 by pulling (or pushing)a weight up hill? Where is the mechanical advantage in that? It seems to me that this explanation is wrong or there's something else he forgot to mention. Imagine you pushing a cart up a 30 degree hill, there's no mechanical advantage. You push one foot up, the cart moves one foot up.
@cmcespedes2 Think of it as if your trying to lift a 100 lb block six feet in the air. It is quite a difficult task but with a 30 degree wedge you could push the block up the slant and have moved the block 12 feet total making it actually 6 feet higher than it started. In a perfect world this is a 2 to 1 advantage but due to friction it is not exactly so. Still a mechanical advantage though. For every foot you move the block, it raises 1/2 a foot vertically. Hope this helps man
You completely misunderstood what a mechanical advantage is. It's basically to lift something with less force but takes longer time. If i move the 10N mass upward by 1 meter, I spend 10J; but if I want to use a 30 degree wedge to help me do the same thing, I spend 10J too, HOWEVER, I spend only 5N of force but takes twice the distance (thus twice the time) to get it upward by 1 meter.
@cmcespedes2 The force you need to apply to lift the weight is reduced using the wedge. That is what mechanical advantage really means. Think like this - You carry a 10 kg box from ground (its heavy), you slide it using a lever, you'll need less force to carry the box. Do you get it now? if not, just try and see for yourself.
The mechanical advantage is NOT 1 (one); it IS 0 (zero) !
There is NO MA in your first illistration.
Actually there would be a NEGATIVE MA due to the friction losses of rope on sheave + sheave/axle on bearing.
It is also TOTALLY WRONG to refer to a " 10 newton weight ".
The newton is the SI unit for force; it is the amount of net force required to accelerate a mass of one kilogram at a rate of one meter per second squared.
@dyoonu Lol don't troll on terminology, his lesson is still valid and the mechanical advantage, is by a 1 times the default force retequired, or that is atleast what he is talking about.
@dyoonu Actually I think weight IS measured in Newtons (it is the force on the object due to the gravitational field). Mass and weight are different concepts.
I just took an exam for a Chemical Operator position with an Oil Company...I wish I had viewed this video before; several questions on the test related to mechanical advantage, pulley systems, and force..I'm sure I would have answered all of the questions correctly..Great explanations!
In the video you have one fixed pulley moving a sliding pulley, decreasing the load by half. If you had two pulleys(fixed) to the sliding pulley(attatched to the weight) would the decrease in Newtons ever be less than half? Thank You.
@BallawdeQuincewold Actually, he meant to say 5DNewtons, which, if distance (D) was 1, it would actually be 5Joules, like you thought it was supposed to be. But D is unknown, so it had to remain as 5DNewtons (which he accidentally corrected to 5DJoules) where the D's would cancel out when you'd compare the equivalent Work in and out so that you could get the Force. Basically Work(in Joules)= xNewtons*Distance, not xJoules*Distance, that was the "Error."
@TheKmanOfSmash But if the 5 was implied as being 5 Newtons and the Joules (J) was just to show that 5(N)D=Work, not that it was actually being multiplied, then there was no error. But that's how you come to enjoy these videos. When Sal makes a mistake, it's kinda fun to use what you just learned to figure out what it was he did wrong. lol
@meruleXD it cuz if you do this system you will lose 2x the speed but you will also get 2x of torque, so if you got a 10kg weght to pull, your actuly pulling 5kg, but you lose 2x the speed, so if you were pulling at 2m/second, your actuly gonna make the weight go up at 1m/second, enything clear in what i just said?
On the inclined plane: Force x Distance can't equal 5 D Joules. This would mean that Force is measured in Joules. Work (in Joules) = F x D. Shouldn't it be Work out divided by work in to calculate efficiency? And, length divided by height or force out divided by force in to calculate mechanical advantage?
You added the second pulley and you didn't say that it wasn't going to be attached. What made. That math isn't mine right now, but you fucked up. That rope ain't moving because that pulley was attached and the rope to the ceiling.
In 2nd example, he did not add the weight of the pulley, and take away and add the weight of the two ft of rope to other side. therefor it is not right.
In most physics problems if the mass of the pulley.. or the rope is not given you assume it's zero... every problem in physics 1 is like this you introduce pulley or rope mass later. In harder problems.
hey for the ones that said that he forgot g.... he actually did not because he gave u a value in N (mg)... he did not give u the mass...he did it right!!! this is very helpful for mcat studying!!!
Darn! I should have watched this video before I applied for my patent, I could have made my invention even stronger. Oh well I guess I could modify it.
Omg, thank you, your 240p video helped me understand physics in 10 minutes than real life day in an entire 50. God bless you sir.
DenitheGreat 2 weeks ago
plz explain the mechanical advantage of single moveable pulley.plz its urgent....
SuperSsarab 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
one fixed pulley moving a sliding pulley, decreasing the load by half. If you had two pulleys(fixed) to the sliding pulley(attatched to the weight) would the decrease in Newtons ever be less than half? Thank You.
MrPEDOCTOR 4 weeks ago
Hi I got a problem dealing with windmill lifting up a weight that is 6.5 Kg. i have to build a windmill that could lift 6.5 Kg weight up to 0.75 meters up. How would you do it?
CanasianZiggie214 1 month ago
physic
adamaqmal 1 month ago
It is difficult to lift a heavy filing cabinet onto a truck. Take a ramp with a 30 degree slope, tilt the cabinet back toward the truck, to the point of balance and then just gently rock it up the ramp. One man job!
putzycockle 2 months ago
you are the reason im passing physics
SikhShooter66 2 months ago
hnjnnnnnnnnnnnnn,
IrishLegend26 3 months ago
work in cant be equal to work out. it may theoretically true but not practically...such machines are ideal or perfect machines which doesn't exist in real sense
fjkfi9ejd 4 months ago
what program u use to write and draw
pacersmith 4 months ago
Whoa! So in this case, the mechanical advantage is the inverse sin(theta). Physics is beautiful!
josenros 5 months ago
I understood the science behind the pulley and how the mechanical advantage is achieved, but the wedge? not so much. How can you have a mechanical "advantage" of 2 by pulling (or pushing)a weight up hill? Where is the mechanical advantage in that? It seems to me that this explanation is wrong or there's something else he forgot to mention. Imagine you pushing a cart up a 30 degree hill, there's no mechanical advantage. You push one foot up, the cart moves one foot up.
cmcespedes2 7 months ago
@cmcespedes2 Think of it as if your trying to lift a 100 lb block six feet in the air. It is quite a difficult task but with a 30 degree wedge you could push the block up the slant and have moved the block 12 feet total making it actually 6 feet higher than it started. In a perfect world this is a 2 to 1 advantage but due to friction it is not exactly so. Still a mechanical advantage though. For every foot you move the block, it raises 1/2 a foot vertically. Hope this helps man
mforum4life 6 months ago
@cmcespedes2
You completely misunderstood what a mechanical advantage is. It's basically to lift something with less force but takes longer time. If i move the 10N mass upward by 1 meter, I spend 10J; but if I want to use a 30 degree wedge to help me do the same thing, I spend 10J too, HOWEVER, I spend only 5N of force but takes twice the distance (thus twice the time) to get it upward by 1 meter.
SpeedAbsolution 5 months ago
@cmcespedes2 The force you need to apply to lift the weight is reduced using the wedge. That is what mechanical advantage really means. Think like this - You carry a 10 kg box from ground (its heavy), you slide it using a lever, you'll need less force to carry the box. Do you get it now? if not, just try and see for yourself.
rmanandhar7 1 month ago
Dude, pure education is what you just did. thanks for simple thinking.
silviom1963 7 months ago
paint skill's, yu no has them
tekstylelov3r 7 months ago
The mechanical advantage is NOT 1 (one); it IS 0 (zero) !
There is NO MA in your first illistration.
Actually there would be a NEGATIVE MA due to the friction losses of rope on sheave + sheave/axle on bearing.
It is also TOTALLY WRONG to refer to a " 10 newton weight ".
The newton is the SI unit for force; it is the amount of net force required to accelerate a mass of one kilogram at a rate of one meter per second squared.
Gray
dyoonu 8 months ago
@dyoonu Lol don't troll on terminology, his lesson is still valid and the mechanical advantage, is by a 1 times the default force retequired, or that is atleast what he is talking about.
Thanks for another great lesson khana.
XeadXhot 7 months ago
@dyoonu Actually I think weight IS measured in Newtons (it is the force on the object due to the gravitational field). Mass and weight are different concepts.
BannedLol4l 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you guys like this, and your interested in the search and rescue field... check out this article I found
Amack215 8 months ago
I just took an exam for a Chemical Operator position with an Oil Company...I wish I had viewed this video before; several questions on the test related to mechanical advantage, pulley systems, and force..I'm sure I would have answered all of the questions correctly..Great explanations!
damongcorbett 9 months ago
search Eureka! Episode 15, explains all this in about 4:45
ShutUpFoolStudios 10 months ago
In the video you have one fixed pulley moving a sliding pulley, decreasing the load by half. If you had two pulleys(fixed) to the sliding pulley(attatched to the weight) would the decrease in Newtons ever be less than half? Thank You.
sifisto 1 year ago
yes
JaktheAtheist 11 months ago
Error: It's Joules, not D*Joules. Joules / d = Newtons.
BallawdeQuincewold 1 year ago
@BallawdeQuincewold Actually, he meant to say 5DNewtons, which, if distance (D) was 1, it would actually be 5Joules, like you thought it was supposed to be. But D is unknown, so it had to remain as 5DNewtons (which he accidentally corrected to 5DJoules) where the D's would cancel out when you'd compare the equivalent Work in and out so that you could get the Force. Basically Work(in Joules)= xNewtons*Distance, not xJoules*Distance, that was the "Error."
TheKmanOfSmash 10 months ago
Comment removed
TheKmanOfSmash 10 months ago
Comment removed
TheKmanOfSmash 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKmanOfSmash But if the 5 was implied as being 5 Newtons and the Joules (J) was just to show that 5(N)D=Work, not that it was actually being multiplied, then there was no error. But that's how you come to enjoy these videos. When Sal makes a mistake, it's kinda fun to use what you just learned to figure out what it was he did wrong. lol
TheKmanOfSmash 10 months ago
I do not understand what you mean by the rope getting shorter... it got really confusing once it got to the multiple pulleys.
meruleXD 1 year ago
@meruleXD it cuz if you do this system you will lose 2x the speed but you will also get 2x of torque, so if you got a 10kg weght to pull, your actuly pulling 5kg, but you lose 2x the speed, so if you were pulling at 2m/second, your actuly gonna make the weight go up at 1m/second, enything clear in what i just said?
HardCoreStrategy 1 year ago
is this mechanism can be useful for bicycle chain system, pls let me know am product designer am looking modify the mechanism....
parampmd 1 year ago
@parampmd you got to remember one thing, you lose 2x the speed by doing this system
HardCoreStrategy 1 year ago
wedge example (2): if the weight was carried instead of pushed, would the M.A. still = 2 (the same as when pushed)
ukidding 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Meet hot sexy Naughty women now ***mworld5.info***
BellaFayec 1 year ago
That's not a wedge. A wedge is two inclined planes put to gether.Good info though.
johniswaycool 1 year ago
On the inclined plane: Force x Distance can't equal 5 D Joules. This would mean that Force is measured in Joules. Work (in Joules) = F x D. Shouldn't it be Work out divided by work in to calculate efficiency? And, length divided by height or force out divided by force in to calculate mechanical advantage?
ronn773 1 year ago
You added the second pulley and you didn't say that it wasn't going to be attached. What made. That math isn't mine right now, but you fucked up. That rope ain't moving because that pulley was attached and the rope to the ceiling.
xceptit 1 year ago
isn't this a single fix pulley cause i just learned this
thekinder901 1 year ago
wooo! metric rules. feet HA!
slownightsolongg 1 year ago
I forgot how to set up the 3:1 scale for rock climbing. I see now how it is done, thanks!
slam2322 1 year ago
In 2nd example, he did not add the weight of the pulley, and take away and add the weight of the two ft of rope to other side. therefor it is not right.
just think if the pulley also is 10 n
LOLRUREAL 1 year ago
In most physics problems if the mass of the pulley.. or the rope is not given you assume it's zero... every problem in physics 1 is like this you introduce pulley or rope mass later. In harder problems.
TylertheAD 1 year ago
Wait. In the first example, he pulls 2x as much rope for the weight to move 1x. Isn't that 2:1?
saysyes 2 years ago 2
The "wheel" part of the pulley is called the shiv. Good video though
farmrally 2 years ago
c'est de la merddddddddddddeeeee!!!!
1998skunk 2 years ago
hey for the ones that said that he forgot g.... he actually did not because he gave u a value in N (mg)... he did not give u the mass...he did it right!!! this is very helpful for mcat studying!!!
valsoued 2 years ago 3
lol ya he did
dudemansam4189 2 years ago
Darn! I should have watched this video before I applied for my patent, I could have made my invention even stronger. Oh well I guess I could modify it.
pongman 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u failed
xlwaiyiplx 2 years ago
No I didn't. I got the patent but I'm thinking I could make it even better.
pongman 2 years ago
@pongman What was your invention?
FutureInventions 1 year ago
@pongman what have you invented that related to a MA, that hasnt been done?
HxXFromFirstToLastXx 7 months ago
thanks
9kolajbertelsen 3 years ago 8
lol the wheel is the pulley..
but u have great videos keep it up :)
jack10133 3 years ago
Its a good video but you had better teach them using FBDs.
danielghofrani 3 years ago
Awesome videos!
Untouchable0ne 4 years ago