only nuclear 3 face detonation of at least 200 kilotons can turn steel to dust the laiser sistem will only melt steel like termite this structure turn into dust ,rug,marbel,ac units,furniture,human,concreete into dust and then burn for months at ground zero wich is the name of the spot where a nuclear devise gos off.
I'm about sick of answering one question that completely exposes the lies then getting hit with stupid shit like "well why would they", "well how could they", it's like talking to little children. The fucked up thing is many if them are actually book smart or educated but ask them to think for themselves and use their own senses to navigate the world around them and they're dumb as dirt.
In the top of my favorites there are two of what I feel are the most damaging videos to the liars who claim there were no explosions going in before they were blown to shit. I never get answers about those. Watching those towers churn and explode all the way down, if you can't put 2 and 2 together, my god, you're completely understandable in your anger, it's been 9 years of these whack jobs, enough enough.
I've worked in scientific circles and seen the biggest douches peer reviewed and seen the actual geniuses who know what they're talking about completely snubbed, while these douches write bullshit and lies. As long as the lies support the previous lies and maintain popular opinion, it's all good for them. Any American that believes these evil motherfuckers and their bought off official story is a stooge.
Talk about playing right into the hands of the puppet masters, ever since 9/11 debunking became big, they all expect everybody to be "peer reviewed" or else they must be wrong. Which does what? Keeps everybody in power and control able to dictate to us what's true and what's not.
@DrBPhD Have to stoop to the outragous comparosion insults. Thats always a good one, must be low on facts and anaysis, YET AGAIN ANOTHER LAUGHABLE COMMENT from you 120 IQ Debunkers. I almost feel ashamed at how much entertainment your ignnorance gives me.
@DrBPhD LOL Guess that one flew over your head. Even funnier you claim that its over 120. You really think i dream about conspricies, lol thats a good one. Yet more 120 IQ quaulity stuff, or 120+ i should say. And yes i keep my analysis short otherwise you debunking clowns, nah your more like monkeys nevertheless you would not be able to comprehend it. Monkey see monkey do. Sorry im not a media brainwashed "normal" person that watches American idol. I actually think what science says?????????
@DrBPhD Really science says that something will fail into the path of greatest resistance. There some simple science for your ignorant ass. Science says a falling building produces temps of 1000 or more for over 6 months. I never knew that. Face it your just a joke. I have raped your mind and the best you can come up with is that i dont understand science.
@f0rumrr "Really science says that something will fail into the path of greatest resistance. There some simple science for your ignorant ass. Science says a falling building produces temps of 1000 or more for over 6 months"
@DrBPhD I already have, you know damn well that if the building really did fail because of a fire, then it would shear off and fall to the ground. Well you might not know that, your statements are pretty ignorant, anyways what would produce temps that hot.
So you see this is how I have made my conclutions. THeres only one force on earth that can make that extreme of conditions.
@DrBPhD OH GUESS WHAT MY POINT WAS THAT statement of how i didnt understand science, yet those are to facts that science backs. Yet i dont understand science but i understand those facts. Hmmm when you gone pull your head out of you ass. YOU PROBOLY ON OF THES DUTCH THAT DONT SMOKE MARIJUANA. I have a hard time believing your dutch.
IM SORRY YOU CANT REALIZE ITS A JOKE JUST LIKE YOU.
do you really think it was a nuclear bomb....bombs blow things apart....IN EVERY DIRECTIOn...INCLUDING UPWARDS...BUT NO DEBRIS WENT UP......WHEN A BOMB GOES OFF THINGS FLY OUT IN EVERY DIRECTION..INCLUDING STRAIGHT UP..BUT ON 9/11 everything just fell down..and some stuff fell down and out a bit..but nothing went up in any way..go use a little cherry bomb...even that will send stuff UP IN THE AIR.....but not at the WTC..everything just fell down like a collapse..AND NUKES MAKE A BLINDING FLASH
@f0rumrr Here is proof it was not a nuclear bomb......first of all a nuclear detonation, even in the basement would have produced an EMP that would have stopped electronics in the area........next...why no radiation.......huh....why did nothing get blown UPWARDS....when a large explosion goes off, things go up.....we never saw any sign that even small bombs went off in the basement....LET ALONE A NUCLEAR BOMB...THAT WOULD HAVE BLOWN THE ENTIRE THING APART AND SENT PIECES A MILE AWAY
@f0rumrr HERE IS A QUOTE FROM YOU EXPLAINING HOW THE NUKE CAUSED THE BUILDING TO COLLAPSE. "It fell where it did because almost instantly the entire core of the first 80 floors dissappeard"..but as I told you just a second ago on my page.this is impossible SINCE 50 STORIES OF THE INTERNAL CORE REMAINED STANDING FOR 10 SECONDS AFTER THE REST OF THE BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED AND WAS IN A HEAP ON THE GROUND..50 STORIES OF INTERNAL CORE REMAINED STANDING FOR 10 SECS..your theory is DEBUNKED any answer?
@JPPolachek Just anyother fuckstard trying to state my statements and trample them. However you fail to realize that was just a rough estimant, and both towers got hit at different levels, so your already wrong, in trying to be specific, you can try all you want ima just sit here and laugh at your fultile attempts at debunking. You dont have a clue on earth how an underground nuclear detonations works. Please make me laugh more. Nagasaki was 60 years ago, we have better technology FAGGOT.
@f0rumrr so are you going to explain why the internal core of the building did not collapse untill 10 seconds after the rest of the building was on the ground....50 stories stood for 10 seconds....I THOUGHT YOU SAID THE NUKE TOOK OUT THE INTERNAL CORE........your BS theory is busted buddy......it is such a wacky theory even the Truther nuts wont let you near there websites....you are as silly as a NO PLANER
I love when fucktards try and stay it wasnt a nuclear demo. Just the same old bullshit. It was so obviously one, all you need to do is look at the results.
@f0rumrr you think it was a nuclear bomb???where do you think it was planted.......Why didnt it Blow the building apart in a million pieces.......if a nuclear bomb would have gone off,,,,ALOT OF PIECES WOULD HAVE GONE UPWARDS......BUT NOT ONE PIECE OF ANYTHING WENT UP....EVERYTHING WENT DOWN.....THATS HOW WE KNOW THAT NO BOMBS WENT OFF......BOMBS BLOW THINGS APART, THEY DONT MAKE THINGS FALL DOWN......and Nuclear bombs make a huge blinding flash..want to revise your theory now??????
BOEING made ALL 747's with DEPLETED URANIUM in the
wings & tail supposedly for BALLAST. I would not be surprised if they also made 767,757,777 & all other planes containing depleted uranium also.DU is most certainly radioactive-especially when it is BURNED. People BREATHE it in most airline crashes
Look up flight 1862 also with Sarin Gas for ISRAEL.
The thing that puzzles me is that some materials have completely evaporated while other materials are intact. The only thing I can think of that could cause that effect is induction. Is induction a by-product of a nuclear device?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There was no nuclear demolition of the WTC. We all saw what happened. The structure got weakened where the plains hat hit and tho whole upper part collapsed on the lower part of the buildings. That's "all".
I see, another so-called no planer, overinterpreting and wrongly interpreting images of 911. The more diffuse the images the more "theories" come out. Dude, thousands of new yorkers have seen those planes crash. And not every ney yorker is on an acid trip, at least not at the same moment. The reasoning in your uploaded vids is incorrect. Jet fuel is not pressurised and the planes were just smashed into the buildings, so naturally you don't see flames at the front but at the back.
@muckletoon your just a little 15 year old who watched some conspiracy tv shows and looked at a website, then you pawn info off like you know something or was there. you ignorant loser
@f0rumrr Just another example of a typical american with a poor vocabulary and an astounding lack of knowledge filling the gaps in his education with conspiracy theories. Get a shrink, get educated and shut up.
@f0rumrr Then the buildings would have collapsed in a totally different way starting from the ground. Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers would have heard and felt the explosion even if it was a small nuke.
@f0rumrr Yes, but there are no accounts of large groups of people missing outside the WTC. The rumble like if a train was passing by was propbably just the vibrations of the towers collapsing. The collapse starts were the planes went in, not at ground level as would be the case when an underground explosion was involved.
@ed11561 Just shut up ignorant undereducated american. This vid is about nuclear demolition of the WTC. Only the dumbest of the dumbest (there's a lot of them in the US) can come up with such a ridiculous theory.
@ed11561 Shut up inferior american. Your vocabulary shows your cultural inferiority in full. No brains no class no future, that describes you best I think.
@ed11561 No commas required here. Btw english is just a poor attempt of an english peasant to speak french anyway, so why bother. No get to your fastfood.
@ed11561 And get off my account page, your comments are below my standards. Your vocabulary disqualifies you as the activist to be taken seriously you pretend to be.
@DrBPhD I love when ignorant fucks have to stoop to the level of spelling and grammar. I mean its all that matters on YOUTUBE. Your a fucking joke dude, americans are suppose to be the dumb ones that think it was OSAMA. THE FORigners are suppose to realize that it was a fraud. You must be one hell of an idoit to believe the same things most ignorance redneck americans think. While most educated americans see the bullshit. I just love raping you debunking clowns in your inconstitant statemnts.
@f0rumrr Your just another stupid american with the poorest of vocabularies possible (even non-native speakers master the english language better than you) who believes everything as long as it is not the bloody obvious. Even apes have more common sense than you do.
@DrBPhD LOL now its foul language, then even more pathetic then saying my spelling is bad. Im sorry that i hate people that are ignorant like youself and just try to come off as smart by speliing u words correctly and using proper grammer. Dude you a joke. You seriously believe a point cant be made because the use a foul language. Take the foul language out its still the name fucking point. They are just used for enphasise. Dont be mad that you have no arugement.
@DrBPhD LOL you think a video gives you enough informantion to betalking about physics and what would happen. You can stick to all those charateristic signs of a nuke, even tho these where signs of radation, there where signs on an emp. There is no way to image what type of nuclear device it was but the 2 facts remain. Tons of micro dust and extreme heats see for over 6 months, THE 2 signs of an underground explotion you cant hide. ITS JUST THAT FUCKING SIMPLE YOU IGNORANT FUCK.
4:15 evidence of what? :) ??? or is it "HEY" clean up this evidence?
and to make me think, most stores would have closed ciruit t.v's like that pizza shop, wonder why we havent seem footages from any of those shops? did it all get confiscated? i am just currious, even if it just showed people running and debris, or even the many financial/federal/buisness buildings that would have high security?
Bush/Cheney could not have planned the Nuke attack while 8 months in office. That explains why Crypto Jew Nancy Pelosie-non-impeachment of the bastUrds. Clinton authorized billin$ to develope a low radiation concrete busting bombs.--Worse of all--Israel company had the whjole contract. Question--If the weight of the WTC caused the concrete to turn into dust,why did the above floors disappear into dust. Thermite forget it--
Nothing new here, the USi Repigs/Demoos/Rats are German Nazi Jews.
wings & tail supposedly for BALLAST. I would not be surprised if they also made 767,757,777 & all other planes containing depleted uranium also.DU is most certainly radioactive-especially when it is BURNED. People BREATHE it in most airline crashes
Look up flight 1862 also with Sarin Gas for ISRAEL.
@DrBPhD The structure got weakened where the plains hat hit and tho whole upper part collapsed on the lower part of the buildings. That's "all". LOL LMFAO
TOTAL FUCKING IDIOT ASSHOLE. BOY U R 1 BRAINDEAD FUCK.
Get a good wank and then a good shrink. Maybe it helps you out of the mental mess you're in. Your constant use of the word fuck points towards a severe sexual frustration (ridiculously small dick, secretly gay?). Now sod off.
Evidence of WTC demolition is overwhelming: - massive amounts of material explosively thrown outward and upward, even at the very top of the towers, before kinetic energy accumulated - near free-fall speeds - symmetric collapses - pyroclastic powdering of concrete - eye-witness reports of explosions - molten steel hotter than jet fuel can burn - clean slices on virtually all framing - thermate residue Non-standard demo but clearly demo. Want specifics? Investigate! But it WAS an INSIDE JOB!
Interesting to see no standing core structures, only the outside skirts. That would suggest internal destruction by some very special technology such as vectored nuke & EMP.
Wrong again. You blame others for not being scientists. But I am a physicist. And I can say with certainty that you do not have one clue about real world science.
Griffin is a superstitious twit. He is not a physicist. Neither are you if you cannot tell that the stuff that flooded NYC more resembles a turbidity flow than a pyroclastic flow. Stop lying to people, surfviper.
Evidence of WTC demolition is overwhelming: - massive amounts of material explosively thrown outward and upward, even at the very top of the towers, before kinetic energy accumulated - near free-fall speeds - symmetric collapses - pyroclastic powdering of concrete - eye-witness reports of explosions - molten steel hotter than jet fuel can burn - clean slices on virtually all framing - thermate residue Non-standard demo but clearly demo. Want specifics? Investigate! But it WAS an INSIDE JOB!
you say 'non-standard' which opens up a catalogue of options, this was the highest building in the world and was pulverised in ten seconds, i'd say only a thermo-nuclear device would contain such force.
Sadly the people behind this are still at large, living in their mansions in Washington...
@muckletoon U think that's bad?The scumbag Gen.Richard Myers who was in charge of NORAD on 911,who utterly failed at his duty was fucking PROMOTED 3 DAYS AFTER 911. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE? HE SUCCEEDED AT HIS JOB? What was his job?To stand down on 911 & do NOTHING?OR help out with the demolition?
There was no pyroclastic flow. It was a turbidity flow. Jones is full of crap about the thermite residue. And there can be no silent nuclear blast of any sort.
This is incredible! These shots are new to me and quite heart-wrenching; thank you so very much for posting this.The devastation from this angle is dramatic. My heart goes out ot all Americans.
This has been flagged as spam show
TO THOSE DIED ; BURN IN HELL PAINFULLY !!!
Great work martyr Sheikh Laden ! (Allahın selamı üzerine olsun.ALLAHUEKBER)
Osama Bin Laden is the hero of USA ! I hope one day i will have the honour to detonate a nuke over NYC or DC.
USA ,ISRAEL and UK ! These allience must be either broken or destroyed otherweise we will be one day the dogs of the jews !!
TurkishWarrior80 2 months ago
only nuclear 3 face detonation of at least 200 kilotons can turn steel to dust the laiser sistem will only melt steel like termite this structure turn into dust ,rug,marbel,ac units,furniture,human,concreete into dust and then burn for months at ground zero wich is the name of the spot where a nuclear devise gos off.
144000V 5 months ago 3
@144000V
very true
Massaricossudo 4 months ago
This was not nuclear......this looks like they perfected Nikola Tesla's Energy Weapon
Born2Flesh 11 months ago 4
@Born2Flesh
Actually it's Pancake Collapse. LMAO.
Massaricossudo 4 months ago
Does anyone know the name of the anchor at the end of this video? 5:45
Thanks
jojopuppyfish 1 year ago
@jojopuppyfish Found out it was Krishnan Guru-Murthy
jojopuppyfish 1 year ago
Strangely quiet. Terrible day, many many people affected.
TheNorseLegend 1 year ago
anyone know where this footage is from? Was it broadcast on the bbc? What time?
Or who shot it?
jojopuppyfish 1 year ago
@jojopuppyfish
It was broadcast by Channel 4 in the UK on the day after 9/11.
Sorry for the poor quality.
muckletoon 1 year ago
@muckletoon Do you know approximately what time? I am working on a documentary and would like to use it.
If I can find out what time it was broadcast (London time), then I can download it from somewhere else.
Also, I am assuming that Channel 4 is different than BBC america, right?
jojopuppyfish 1 year ago
google "dimitri khalezov wtc nuclear demolition"
originalbunkman 1 year ago 4
@originalbunkman
Dimitri nothing but a comedy shill, can't take him seriously at all.
muckletoon 1 year ago
if a nuclear device was used wouldnt the area still be very radioactive to this day ?
bladesman123 1 year ago
@f0rumrr
I'm about sick of answering one question that completely exposes the lies then getting hit with stupid shit like "well why would they", "well how could they", it's like talking to little children. The fucked up thing is many if them are actually book smart or educated but ask them to think for themselves and use their own senses to navigate the world around them and they're dumb as dirt.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@F0rumrr
In the top of my favorites there are two of what I feel are the most damaging videos to the liars who claim there were no explosions going in before they were blown to shit. I never get answers about those. Watching those towers churn and explode all the way down, if you can't put 2 and 2 together, my god, you're completely understandable in your anger, it's been 9 years of these whack jobs, enough enough.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
I've worked in scientific circles and seen the biggest douches peer reviewed and seen the actual geniuses who know what they're talking about completely snubbed, while these douches write bullshit and lies. As long as the lies support the previous lies and maintain popular opinion, it's all good for them. Any American that believes these evil motherfuckers and their bought off official story is a stooge.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
Talk about playing right into the hands of the puppet masters, ever since 9/11 debunking became big, they all expect everybody to be "peer reviewed" or else they must be wrong. Which does what? Keeps everybody in power and control able to dictate to us what's true and what's not.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
I must admit that human loss and injury was bad and is a big sin for a muslim to commit to harm living people.
However I liked how US politics , security , economy , finance and NY urban were damaged weel that time.
We must find a way to disturb the enemy without killing them.
TurkishWarrior80 1 year ago
@TurkishWarrior80
You go Jew.
BrodyLuv2 1 year ago
The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects.
Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"
WTCnucleardemolition 1 year ago
@DrBPhD Have to stoop to the outragous comparosion insults. Thats always a good one, must be low on facts and anaysis, YET AGAIN ANOTHER LAUGHABLE COMMENT from you 120 IQ Debunkers. I almost feel ashamed at how much entertainment your ignnorance gives me.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr My IQ is signifficantly higher than 120. Any idea what that means?
Now shut up and dream your dreams about ridiculous conspiracies.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD LOL Guess that one flew over your head. Even funnier you claim that its over 120. You really think i dream about conspricies, lol thats a good one. Yet more 120 IQ quaulity stuff, or 120+ i should say. And yes i keep my analysis short otherwise you debunking clowns, nah your more like monkeys nevertheless you would not be able to comprehend it. Monkey see monkey do. Sorry im not a media brainwashed "normal" person that watches American idol. I actually think what science says?????????
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr But you don't understand what science says I guess.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD Really science says that something will fail into the path of greatest resistance. There some simple science for your ignorant ass. Science says a falling building produces temps of 1000 or more for over 6 months. I never knew that. Face it your just a joke. I have raped your mind and the best you can come up with is that i dont understand science.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr "Really science says that something will fail into the path of greatest resistance. There some simple science for your ignorant ass. Science says a falling building produces temps of 1000 or more for over 6 months"
Make your point dude.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD I already have, you know damn well that if the building really did fail because of a fire, then it would shear off and fall to the ground. Well you might not know that, your statements are pretty ignorant, anyways what would produce temps that hot.
So you see this is how I have made my conclutions. THeres only one force on earth that can make that extreme of conditions.
YOUR MY BITCH.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@DrBPhD OH GUESS WHAT MY POINT WAS THAT statement of how i didnt understand science, yet those are to facts that science backs. Yet i dont understand science but i understand those facts. Hmmm when you gone pull your head out of you ass. YOU PROBOLY ON OF THES DUTCH THAT DONT SMOKE MARIJUANA. I have a hard time believing your dutch.
IM SORRY YOU CANT REALIZE ITS A JOKE JUST LIKE YOU.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr The analysis on this issue can be indeed very short. No need for an extensive debate, it would be a waste of time.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@f0rumrr I usually go off-scale in IQ tests (upwards that is). No kidding. Many physicists do btw.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
do you really think it was a nuclear bomb....bombs blow things apart....IN EVERY DIRECTIOn...INCLUDING UPWARDS...BUT NO DEBRIS WENT UP......WHEN A BOMB GOES OFF THINGS FLY OUT IN EVERY DIRECTION..INCLUDING STRAIGHT UP..BUT ON 9/11 everything just fell down..and some stuff fell down and out a bit..but nothing went up in any way..go use a little cherry bomb...even that will send stuff UP IN THE AIR.....but not at the WTC..everything just fell down like a collapse..AND NUKES MAKE A BLINDING FLASH
JPPolachek 1 year ago
Comment removed
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr Here is proof it was not a nuclear bomb......first of all a nuclear detonation, even in the basement would have produced an EMP that would have stopped electronics in the area........next...why no radiation.......huh....why did nothing get blown UPWARDS....when a large explosion goes off, things go up.....we never saw any sign that even small bombs went off in the basement....LET ALONE A NUCLEAR BOMB...THAT WOULD HAVE BLOWN THE ENTIRE THING APART AND SENT PIECES A MILE AWAY
JPPolachek 1 year ago
@f0rumrr HERE IS A QUOTE FROM YOU EXPLAINING HOW THE NUKE CAUSED THE BUILDING TO COLLAPSE. "It fell where it did because almost instantly the entire core of the first 80 floors dissappeard"..but as I told you just a second ago on my page.this is impossible SINCE 50 STORIES OF THE INTERNAL CORE REMAINED STANDING FOR 10 SECONDS AFTER THE REST OF THE BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED AND WAS IN A HEAP ON THE GROUND..50 STORIES OF INTERNAL CORE REMAINED STANDING FOR 10 SECS..your theory is DEBUNKED any answer?
JPPolachek 1 year ago
@JPPolachek Just anyother fuckstard trying to state my statements and trample them. However you fail to realize that was just a rough estimant, and both towers got hit at different levels, so your already wrong, in trying to be specific, you can try all you want ima just sit here and laugh at your fultile attempts at debunking. You dont have a clue on earth how an underground nuclear detonations works. Please make me laugh more. Nagasaki was 60 years ago, we have better technology FAGGOT.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr so are you going to explain why the internal core of the building did not collapse untill 10 seconds after the rest of the building was on the ground....50 stories stood for 10 seconds....I THOUGHT YOU SAID THE NUKE TOOK OUT THE INTERNAL CORE........your BS theory is busted buddy......it is such a wacky theory even the Truther nuts wont let you near there websites....you are as silly as a NO PLANER
JPPolachek 1 year ago
I love when fucktards try and stay it wasnt a nuclear demo. Just the same old bullshit. It was so obviously one, all you need to do is look at the results.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr you think it was a nuclear bomb???where do you think it was planted.......Why didnt it Blow the building apart in a million pieces.......if a nuclear bomb would have gone off,,,,ALOT OF PIECES WOULD HAVE GONE UPWARDS......BUT NOT ONE PIECE OF ANYTHING WENT UP....EVERYTHING WENT DOWN.....THATS HOW WE KNOW THAT NO BOMBS WENT OFF......BOMBS BLOW THINGS APART, THEY DONT MAKE THINGS FALL DOWN......and Nuclear bombs make a huge blinding flash..want to revise your theory now??????
JPPolachek 1 year ago
BOEING made ALL 747's with DEPLETED URANIUM in the
wings & tail supposedly for BALLAST. I would not be surprised if they also made 767,757,777 & all other planes containing depleted uranium also.DU is most certainly radioactive-especially when it is BURNED. People BREATHE it in most airline crashes
Look up flight 1862 also with Sarin Gas for ISRAEL.
ed11561 1 year ago
manhattan looked like Stalingrad in 1942 that days...
misteraxl1 2 years ago
Nuked
bill0w 2 years ago 10
The thing that puzzles me is that some materials have completely evaporated while other materials are intact. The only thing I can think of that could cause that effect is induction. Is induction a by-product of a nuclear device?
kaferere 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There was no nuclear demolition of the WTC. We all saw what happened. The structure got weakened where the plains hat hit and tho whole upper part collapsed on the lower part of the buildings. That's "all".
DrBPhD 2 years ago
and if you leave a tooth under your pillow a fairy will leave you 10pence
muckletoon 2 years ago 17
Don't get the point, do you think it was nuked or do you make reference to a fairy tale to ridicule those who think it was?
DrBPhD 2 years ago
I see, another so-called no planer, overinterpreting and wrongly interpreting images of 911. The more diffuse the images the more "theories" come out. Dude, thousands of new yorkers have seen those planes crash. And not every ney yorker is on an acid trip, at least not at the same moment. The reasoning in your uploaded vids is incorrect. Jet fuel is not pressurised and the planes were just smashed into the buildings, so naturally you don't see flames at the front but at the back.
DrBPhD 2 years ago
@muckletoon your just a little 15 year old who watched some conspiracy tv shows and looked at a website, then you pawn info off like you know something or was there. you ignorant loser
rocker4u123 1 year ago
Comment removed
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr Just another example of a typical american with a poor vocabulary and an astounding lack of knowledge filling the gaps in his education with conspiracy theories. Get a shrink, get educated and shut up.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@f0rumrr If there is one person ignorant it is you. You have no idea about nuclear explosions.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
Comment removed
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr Then the buildings would have collapsed in a totally different way starting from the ground. Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers would have heard and felt the explosion even if it was a small nuke.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
Comment removed
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr Yes, but there are no accounts of large groups of people missing outside the WTC. The rumble like if a train was passing by was propbably just the vibrations of the towers collapsing. The collapse starts were the planes went in, not at ground level as would be the case when an underground explosion was involved.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
Comment removed
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@DrBPhD LOL sure that's all that happened to a braindead retard who listens to the government. WTC 7 fell in sympathy to the WTC towers,
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 Just shut up ignorant undereducated american. This vid is about nuclear demolition of the WTC. Only the dumbest of the dumbest (there's a lot of them in the US) can come up with such a ridiculous theory.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD LOL ASSHOLE FOREIGNER LOL
I never said there was a NUCLEAR demolition brainfart.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 Shut up inferior american. Your vocabulary shows your cultural inferiority in full. No brains no class no future, that describes you best I think.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD No brains no class no future NO COMMAS LOL ASSHOLE.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 No commas required here. Btw english is just a poor attempt of an english peasant to speak french anyway, so why bother. No get to your fastfood.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrBPhD Btw english is just a poor attempt of an english peasant to speak french anyway
IS THAT SUPPOSED TO BE FUNNY U MENTALLY CRIPPLED ASSHOLE.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 And get off my account page, your comments are below my standards. Your vocabulary disqualifies you as the activist to be taken seriously you pretend to be.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD I love when ignorant fucks have to stoop to the level of spelling and grammar. I mean its all that matters on YOUTUBE. Your a fucking joke dude, americans are suppose to be the dumb ones that think it was OSAMA. THE FORigners are suppose to realize that it was a fraud. You must be one hell of an idoit to believe the same things most ignorance redneck americans think. While most educated americans see the bullshit. I just love raping you debunking clowns in your inconstitant statemnts.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr Your just another stupid american with the poorest of vocabularies possible (even non-native speakers master the english language better than you) who believes everything as long as it is not the bloody obvious. Even apes have more common sense than you do.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@f0rumrr If you need foul language to make your point you have no point at all.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD LOL now its foul language, then even more pathetic then saying my spelling is bad. Im sorry that i hate people that are ignorant like youself and just try to come off as smart by speliing u words correctly and using proper grammer. Dude you a joke. You seriously believe a point cant be made because the use a foul language. Take the foul language out its still the name fucking point. They are just used for enphasise. Dont be mad that you have no arugement.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@f0rumrr No radiation, no blast, no earthquake, no EMP. Check out a vid of an underground test a you have your proof it wasn't a nuke.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD LOL you think a video gives you enough informantion to betalking about physics and what would happen. You can stick to all those charateristic signs of a nuke, even tho these where signs of radation, there where signs on an emp. There is no way to image what type of nuclear device it was but the 2 facts remain. Tons of micro dust and extreme heats see for over 6 months, THE 2 signs of an underground explotion you cant hide. ITS JUST THAT FUCKING SIMPLE YOU IGNORANT FUCK.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
@ed11561 Now get lost.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
why was this called "nuclear aftermath"?
banloo29 2 years ago
Google "9/11 Cancers"
WTCnucleardemolition 2 years ago
Who shot this video and are they still living? Are they still well and healthy?
piasillo 2 years ago
The Naudet "first hit" corner at 4:26.
PollenB 2 years ago
Micro nuke or Directed energy weapon,
why all the trashed cars and powdered debris?
trapozoidalsyth 2 years ago
My personal opinion - a Micro Nuke.
ww w. fas. org/sgp/othergov/doe/rdd-7.h tml
PollenB 2 years ago
Comment removed
PollenB 2 years ago
4:15 evidence of what? :) ??? or is it "HEY" clean up this evidence?
and to make me think, most stores would have closed ciruit t.v's like that pizza shop, wonder why we havent seem footages from any of those shops? did it all get confiscated? i am just currious, even if it just showed people running and debris, or even the many financial/federal/buisness buildings that would have high security?
realistromeo 2 years ago
Comment removed
kevin604bc 2 years ago
this is fake its not a nuclear bomb aftermath
Mycookiedidit11 3 years ago
Thank you. If a nuclear bomb was used, Manhattan would be an American Hiroshima
mafaldacrumbwitty 2 years ago
It's called a micro nuke. They have been around for over 50 years.
kevin604bc 2 years ago
they used the term nuclear because its slang you dumbass. its slang for massivve distruction
miamiforlyfe 2 years ago
Hey! I have a couple questions about places in this video, if anyone can answer them it would be cool.
Is that the Burger King at 4:12?
What's the name of the pizza place at 4:25? Is it still there?
Kamatzu 3 years ago
this all started back when bushes daddy was in office.
but truth be told there have been a lot of cover ups throughout the 20th century
bushes grandpa supplied adolf hitler with oil which he used to burn down London.
vietnam was started when a united states destroyer i think it was, was bombed and sunk just off the northern Vietnam shores.
theres a bunch of videos on youtube about a lot of cover ups like this stretching all the way back to world war 1.
greyemotion 3 years ago
google: The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects
WTCnucleardemolition 3 years ago
Bush/Cheney could not have planned the Nuke attack while 8 months in office. That explains why Crypto Jew Nancy Pelosie-non-impeachment of the bastUrds. Clinton authorized billin$ to develope a low radiation concrete busting bombs.--Worse of all--Israel company had the whjole contract. Question--If the weight of the WTC caused the concrete to turn into dust,why did the above floors disappear into dust. Thermite forget it--
Nothing new here, the USi Repigs/Demoos/Rats are German Nazi Jews.
geo1671 3 years ago
Radiation-induced cancer
google: we got nuked on 9/11
WTCnucleardemolition 3 years ago 2
@WTCnucleardemolition BOEING made ALL 747's with DEPLETED URANIUM in the
wings & tail supposedly for BALLAST. I would not be surprised if they also made 767,757,777 & all other planes containing depleted uranium also.DU is most certainly radioactive-especially when it is BURNED. People BREATHE it in most airline crashes
Look up flight 1862 also with Sarin Gas for ISRAEL.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 Do some research fool. DU has not been used in aircraft since the 1980's.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
@DrBPhD The structure got weakened where the plains hat hit and tho whole upper part collapsed on the lower part of the buildings. That's "all". LOL LMFAO
TOTAL FUCKING IDIOT ASSHOLE. BOY U R 1 BRAINDEAD FUCK.
ed11561 1 year ago
Get a good wank and then a good shrink. Maybe it helps you out of the mental mess you're in. Your constant use of the word fuck points towards a severe sexual frustration (ridiculously small dick, secretly gay?). Now sod off.
DrBPhD 1 year ago
What happened to the cars..? Collapsing buildings dont cause that.? Odd...??
401Hammer 3 years ago 2
could have been fires/heated metal or mlted steel
GovernmentGoneWild 3 years ago
Go shoot some more milsurp weapons lefty, please.
Stop embarrassing urself so much. Please, for the sake of ur own honor
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
surfviper 3 years ago
Interesting to see no standing core structures, only the outside skirts. That would suggest internal destruction by some very special technology such as vectored nuke & EMP.
throttlelever 4 years ago
There are no vectored nukes.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Wrong again. You blame others for not being scientists. But I am a physicist. And I can say with certainty that you do not have one clue about real world science.
surfviper 3 years ago
Griffin is a superstitious twit. He is not a physicist. Neither are you if you cannot tell that the stuff that flooded NYC more resembles a turbidity flow than a pyroclastic flow. Stop lying to people, surfviper.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Read:
Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory by David Ray Griffin
to get the low-down on lies by the neocon shills and trolls, and other would-be debunkers, who comment here.
surfviper 4 years ago
Griffin is not a scientist. He has no credentials for the crap he spews. He's a superstitious ass.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Griffin is at least logical, and logically analyzes available information before forming opinions.
You could learn from him Lefty.
surfviper 3 years ago
He is not logical. He argues from ignorance. He knows bugger-all about the subjects he addresses.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
surfviper 4 years ago 4
you say 'non-standard' which opens up a catalogue of options, this was the highest building in the world and was pulverised in ten seconds, i'd say only a thermo-nuclear device would contain such force.
Sadly the people behind this are still at large, living in their mansions in Washington...
muckletoon 4 years ago
Very sad, and too true!!
surfviper 3 years ago
@muckletoon U think that's bad?The scumbag Gen.Richard Myers who was in charge of NORAD on 911,who utterly failed at his duty was fucking PROMOTED 3 DAYS AFTER 911. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE? HE SUCCEEDED AT HIS JOB? What was his job?To stand down on 911 & do NOTHING?OR help out with the demolition?
ed11561 1 year ago
@muckletoon
did you graduate grade school yet?
lol
nuclear demo - wow
Denierbud11 1 year ago
There was no pyroclastic flow. It was a turbidity flow. Jones is full of crap about the thermite residue. And there can be no silent nuclear blast of any sort.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Lefty, you ignorant twit -- you are wrong in every direction.
First, there ARE such things as pure radiative "explosions" that are silent.
Second, and more importantly, WHO said the explosions at WTC were silent? They weren't. EVERYONE heard explosions.
surfviper 3 years ago
Totally awesome video of the scenes after the attack. Looks like a nuclear bomb went off.
Srhandel 4 years ago 2
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!
winexprt 4 years ago 6
WRONG.
AJ78910 4 years ago
This is incredible! These shots are new to me and quite heart-wrenching; thank you so very much for posting this.The devastation from this angle is dramatic. My heart goes out ot all Americans.
calixtesaint 4 years ago 2