plz tell me why its called hopeless and nice deck i feel like dueling against u cuz i have a warrior deck vwxyz deck sixsam and soon going to make tele dad
the deck has 2 names tbh the one every1 knows is hopeless dragon... some people seem to think that once u get the field set up its hopeless for your opponants to beat but the other name is dragons of dispair..... tbh in not exactly sure how the deck got its name... but it seems to have stuck
thanks.... tryin to make a better deck than this that doesnt need armageddons.... plus it wont b mostly dark either it will b more of a mix with an attempt at gettin possibly white knight dragon, clear vice dragon and clear world i.... but unsure about clear world atm as i only have 1
Not a bad deck I wouldn't mind using a red eyes darkness dragon and 3 blue eyes with ultimate and 5 head dragon too and flute of summoning dragons with Lord Of D. That will get kickbutt monsters out in no time
honestly...... dont mix red eyes and blue eyes unless its 3 wyverns and 3 darkness metals in terms of red eyes....... no ultimate unless u prefere to use it and 2 five headed........NO!! flute of summoning dragons or lord of d......... cause they suck with dragons...... redmd is a million times better cause it means u arent taking up spaces in the deck with the pointless flutes........
Lolz yea but one flute is good enough for me but I know many ways to get many dragons without it besides it was a suggestion :P I like mixin red eyes and blue eyes we have a different view on how much monsters and magics and traps. Although nice deck tho :)
Lolz thnx and I use more traps I use like 10 magics and 10 traps and like 16 non tribute monsters and like 9 tributing monsters. Making a perfect 45 card deck Unless I need more magics or traps then I'd go for a 48 or 50 card deck
yea ive won roughly just under half of the matches ive played using this deck but it was just a trial deck trying to work out new ideas in order to get future decks running better......
I was going to say 5* for the paramore....but this...umm
krad1313 2 years ago
i thought i'd b different and use the cover by sea of treachery......
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
its ok i still give you 5* i like the interesting cover
krad1313 2 years ago
thanks
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
plz tell me why its called hopeless and nice deck i feel like dueling against u cuz i have a warrior deck vwxyz deck sixsam and soon going to make tele dad
superrejectboy 2 years ago
the deck has 2 names tbh the one every1 knows is hopeless dragon... some people seem to think that once u get the field set up its hopeless for your opponants to beat but the other name is dragons of dispair..... tbh in not exactly sure how the deck got its name... but it seems to have stuck
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
dude this deck is AWEsome
10000/5=EPIC WIN
darkgranddragon 2 years ago
thanks.... tryin to make a better deck than this that doesnt need armageddons.... plus it wont b mostly dark either it will b more of a mix with an attempt at gettin possibly white knight dragon, clear vice dragon and clear world i.... but unsure about clear world atm as i only have 1
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
i have grave of a super ancient organism
if you need it
*4 trade* ahem
darkgranddragon 2 years ago
no use in the deck as it works against the idea of the deck
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
Not a bad deck I wouldn't mind using a red eyes darkness dragon and 3 blue eyes with ultimate and 5 head dragon too and flute of summoning dragons with Lord Of D. That will get kickbutt monsters out in no time
RockStunner007 2 years ago
honestly...... dont mix red eyes and blue eyes unless its 3 wyverns and 3 darkness metals in terms of red eyes....... no ultimate unless u prefere to use it and 2 five headed........NO!! flute of summoning dragons or lord of d......... cause they suck with dragons...... redmd is a million times better cause it means u arent taking up spaces in the deck with the pointless flutes........
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
Lolz yea but one flute is good enough for me but I know many ways to get many dragons without it besides it was a suggestion :P I like mixin red eyes and blue eyes we have a different view on how much monsters and magics and traps. Although nice deck tho :)
RockStunner007 2 years ago
uummm.......... i have a dragon deck with
blue eyes&red eyes so ya and to top it off
i dont have ANY wyverns
darkgranddragon 2 years ago
Lolz thnx and I use more traps I use like 10 magics and 10 traps and like 16 non tribute monsters and like 9 tributing monsters. Making a perfect 45 card deck Unless I need more magics or traps then I'd go for a 48 or 50 card deck
RockStunner007 2 years ago
Plz tell me the names of all the dragon cards and all the synchro cuz it was pretty dark in the vid couldn't see.
RockStunner007 2 years ago
list of cards in the deck is under more info
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
hey who is singing?
SynchroDuelist9 2 years ago
sea of treachery
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
i have 1 other wyvern but i wanna keep it cause they rock
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
you should put like two cost down cards in it for your tribute monsters.that way they will be easier to summon.
CrystalBeastMaster 2 years ago
can i trade u for trade in plz?
101Ballerboy 2 years ago
i like thios deck :)
MTBrodog 2 years ago
kwl thanks
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago
yea ive won roughly just under half of the matches ive played using this deck but it was just a trial deck trying to work out new ideas in order to get future decks running better......
BlazeSkyress 2 years ago