Nostalgia Critic's Reaction to "Tangled" Ending

[SuperTouhoufreak]

that was actually his reaction to pokemon: the first movie, when the pokemon cried and brought Ash/Satoshi back to life

XD

[Disney65Fan]

0:57 I thought he likes this movie LOL now his saying its stupid omg.

[Disney65Fan]

I cried for like a minute while watching this and the minute he came back to life again I was like WHOA HIS ALIVE LOL Brilliant movie though.

[Zuyuri]

Oh of course, the missing ingredient; Rapunzel tears mixed with the heart of Inspector Gadget while magic moonbeams rain from above during rhe chanting of "We care" after taking him to the Genesis planet. WHOOPSIE! :P

[KibaLover3029]

I like this version

[DukeTravers]

this is edited by the video from the response video above

[r2grcg]

To be honest, that's what I thought about the ending. I like Tangled but this scene always bugged me. So cliché, so cheesy, pretty expected, and such a letdown. It was a bit of a shocker he died at that point, rather daring and his sacrifice was touching...buuuuuut then that happened, I was like, "Really? Really?!"

[AlbinoTanuki]

@r2grcg Well, if you think about it, even without knowing about the original Brother's Grimm story, Rapunzel received her magic hair from the magic flower prenatally, observing into her body, so when her hair is cut, the last of her magic is observed into her tears, hence what brought back Eugene from the dead. Farfetched, maybe, but heck, in the original story, its never explained or implied at all why Rapunzel has magic healing tears that can cure blindness.

[SirenSima]

@r2grcg Hell, when I watched the Pokemon movie for the first time, I was actually reminded of the Rapunzel story because she used her tear to help the prince to see again (because he was blinded by thorns). The Rapunzel story came first and I was wondering if Tangled was also going to use the healing tear like in the original story and they did.

[FairysRule206]

I watched this on my iPod and it doesn't show captions

[AlbinoTanuki]

@FairysRule206 Oh I see.

[FairysRule206]

Oops sorry

[AlbinoTanuki]

@FairysRule206 Yeah, thats why I have the caption below that says "PLEASE read description below."

[FairysRule206]

You people are all just haters I love this movie

[AlbinoTanuki]

@FairysRule206 I love the movie too. PLEASE read the description below the video. -_-;;

[SnivySolid]

Maybe a cliche, but in fact if it's a Disney Princess movie, of course it wasn't finish with the death of the hero. And apart, the "magic tears" makes a little more sense here than in the original book. So, Disney didn't actually failed, just the use of that cliche made it look like that.

And NC, that Pokemon thingy...that's what you get for editing the story, cause in the original script, Ash did died.

[LexiiPebbles]

eeh, the "magic tear" thing wasnt that bad cuz in the original fairytale, when the prince was blinded, rapunzel cried on him and her tears gave him back his vision. yep.. i'm a geek^^

*SQUUEEE*

[AlbinoTanuki]

@LexiiPebbles I'm familiar with the original story; I just thought it would be funny to see the Nostalgia Critic's reaction to this scene.

[blackrapture1990]

I think what really pissed me off about this movie was that instead of investing money in a good guard system and looking for their daughter who obviously wasn't in that much of a hard to get to place if someone could get to it on a horse the king and queen spend god knows how many of those good peoples tax dollars on some fucking lanterns!!

[AlbinoTanuki]

@blackrapture1990 Eh. They're probably busy finding their OTHER missing kid in Iraq.

[UnlockYourHeart55]

@blackrapture1990

I thought that the townspeople just bought their own lanterns.

[fanofsolo]

He did a tangled review?

[jaguar4u2012]

@fanofsolo

No, its review of Pockemon

when the pockemons resurects Ash with their Tears

[Dracoward]

Really Ithought you would've used the line from the 'Once upon a Forest' review,...

"Oh of course, the missing ingrediant: Pikachu tears mixed with the heart of Inspector Gadget during the chanting of "we care" after taking her from the chalisis plant (?). Whoopsy!"

[slashermaster28]

I find it sad you had to explain this was a joke in the summary. People on this site really can't take a joke, can they?

[PurpleStorm8]

Yea, I hate that tear thing.

[AlbinoTanuki]

@PurpleStorm8 For me in this story, it doesn't really bother me. Rapunzel had the magic inside her all along, so when her hair was cut, the last of the magic got absorbed into her tears, which brought Flynn back to life.

Take in mind that a similar thing happened in the original story in which Rapunzel's tears cure's her lover's blindness, but its not out of magic or anything, it just happened.

[paynexkillerAOTF]

YOUR NOT CRYING HARD ENOUGH, DONT YOU LOVE YOUR FARTHER?

[Callimo]

I dunno, I think this made sense to me because Rapunzel in tangled was the living representation of the magic flower. Like its magic is entwined with her DNA or something.

[hhsgirl12345]

Even though I love this movie, I am an NC fan, and the first time I saw it, I thought of his Pokemon review, lol. :p

[Possemaster]

It's a Disney film! Did you actually expect it make sense?

[A88mph]

I thought at this part was "of corce, Pikachu tears, mixed with the heart of Inspector Gadget..."

[ronjoe17]

I actually thought just about this. I mean, really magic tears? In Beauty and the Beast, Beast dies, but is brought back because Belle broke the spell. He was brought back because of true love, not tears. This is just deux ex machina (they never said anything about the tears being magical, just her hair. Once the magic left her hair, she should've been a normal girl)

Honestly I thought PatF had the better ending. Ray died, but he got to be with his true love. Now THAT's romance!

[AlbinoTanuki]

@ronjoe17 Actually, the same thing happened in the original Brother's Grimm fairytale where Rapunzel heal's the prince's blindness with her tears.

An explanation of why this might've happened is that the flower her mother ingested observed into Rapunzel's body and that traveled to her hair and that by cutting it, the last bit of magic got obsorbed back into her body through her tears.

Theending maybe a cop-out, but it has a better justification than the original.

[dottiedots221]

haha I thought of this movie when I watched that review. and I kinda agree, all of the magic disappeared. how could there be more left?

[AlbinoTanuki]

@dottiedots221 The magic got absorbed back into Rapunzel's body after her hair was cut, hence the last bit of it was left in her tears.

[dottiedots221]

@AlbinoTanuki that makes sense. thanks :)

[powerpup97]

Exactly what my thoughts were when I first saw this movie!

[Haley24x7]

I had a simular reaction to this movie xD

[Fujikogirl]

By the way, I know how you feel about the video thing. I keep telling people that about my Blood + parody video and they all got upset about their favorite character without reading the description; or in my case, paying attention to the title. >_>

[Fujikogirl]

LOL! OMG! He probably WOULD say that! xD

[eggyolksam]

This was my same reaction. Thank you.

[chobo500]

when this happened I was shouting one thing:

HEART!!!!!!!!!!

[ACFan120]

Ah, the Pokemon Movie review. The only review that the Critic has done, that I'll never watch.

[charizardoreo]

@ACFan120 why not

[ACFan120]

@charizardoreo At the beginning of the review, he said that he knew nothing about Pokemon. I figured I would have been yelling at him through out the entire review, criticizing his critic. To save me the trouble, I've decided to not watch the review.

[MJTRadio]

The sad thing is this is actually somewhat in line with the actual fairy tale. In the actual tale the guy who rescues her falls into a thorn bush, blinding him. Rapunzel's tears actually restore his eye sight.

And that's WITHOUT a magic flower in her body. This is probably the most justified case of tears as Deux ex Machina there is.

[AlbinoTanuki]

@MJTRadio Yes, I'm familiar with how the original Rapunzel story went, thank you, and yeah, even though its a stretch, its a better justification than the former.

[MJTRadio]

@AlbinoTanuki Well the comment was actually not meant for anyone specific, it was just for anyone who didn't know

[Lvsunshine72]

Dum video

[AlbinoTanuki]

@Lvsunshine72 Everyone's a critic.

[dominoesandtin]

my little brother saw this and when it it came to the crying part, he thought the same thing

[AlbinoTanuki]

@dominoesandtin True. Though this video really isn't mocking this scene per say, but rather poking fun of what the Nostalgia Critic would react to seeing this scene.

[crazyviewer109]

IT'S A cliche  that's been use many time in movies like this one.

[AlbinoTanuki]

@crazyviewer109 I know. If you WHY this video is suppose to be funny, go watch the Nostalgia Critic's review of "Pokemon: The First Movie". After that, you'll probably find this video a lot more funny.

[crazyviewer109]

@AlbinoTanuki All ready did Months ago ;)

[briancurtiswalker]

I liked your video b/c I know your pain. Tho to be fair, with those specific comments, I can see why people are upset.

[AlbinoTanuki]

@briancurtiswalker Yeah; it gets pretty annoying when you have to CONSTANTLY explain to someone the context of your video when they start to act all Douchey McNitpick all because they got offended that one of their (and mine as well) favorite movies is parodied in a video when I meant not to be offensive at all.

[midnight0079]

if you think about it... he didn't have to cut her hair... it could have been not so touching. She could have healed him and then cut her hair and the wicked bitch still woulda turned to dust :D but this was just as good cause I cried anyways... lol I'm such a sap!!

[Disney65Fan]

My reaction to the death scene in Tangled was shocked because it was such an intense heartbreaking scene