Like the song, hate the video. Most of the men shown here were very wise, and intelligent. Some more to one side than the other, but very few of these men were lacking intelligence.
All around, the maker of this video seems ill-informed, or just simply enjoys mocking the dead.
OK, now you are just being intentionally provocative aren't you? Martin Luther AND Jesus? You're lucky the bible commands us to be slow to anger and quick to forgive, my friend.
Jesus went into the video becuase he made history. (And payed the price) please DONT do something dumb b4 u die. It will shorten your llife expectancy by your remaining years.
While I like the song, I'm offended by this for several reasons. First, I'm offended that you put Martin Luther in here because I am a Lutheran. Second, I was offended that Walt Disney was in here because he was a kind and generous man, which are qualities you never see in typical businessmen. Third, I can't understand why Albert Einstein is in here since he obviously wasn't dumb. I hope you just put them in here because they are famous people. Fortunately, I stopped watching before I got to th
@darthvadersith514 The song is poking fun at the stupid actions of the people. Just cause Einstein was smart doesn't mean that making the atomic bomb wasn't his admitted biggest mistake and allowing them to fire it not knowing if the Nuclear reaction would stop or not is pretty stupid if you ask me..
@darthvadersith514 u stopped watching cuz you had a heart attack and rolled in your grave as Adolf Hitler marched into the grave with you in his vagina
Wow. I was mightily surprised to see Gustav Vasa added to this, and even more surprised to see ex-prime minister Göran Persson added as well (right in between Hitler and Stalin- you really must not like him! :D). Are you a fellow swede?
@lucasliso Difference is, Hitler and Stalin were history's greatest monsters. The swedish prime minister in between was sort of an oaf, but he was elected and ruled democratically.
@Greatkingrat88 There were a lot of greatest monsters than Hitler and Stalin, they are just less popular.
And regardless of being elected democratically, the moment a politician starts doing unpopular things, they stop being democratic. So its down to the same: Every politician is stupid.
@Greatkingrat88 Not really. Politics, as a whole, is stupid. We know half of what they do when we know about it. And if we add to that, that we only know what they do half the time, it adds up to we not really knowing ever what is actually going on. And since we are the ones voting them, we are not really voting anything that we know. No political problem in the world was ever solved by a politician, especially not when they assume power.
@Greatkingrat88 I'm an Anarchist. I don't believe in any form of government in which people do not represent themselves completely. Elected politicians, even if democratically elected, will still hold more power than the people themselves, even if the people get upset and want to make him quit. Political and economical crisis means that democratically elected leaders tend to do unpopular things, and still remain in power. Power that people gave them in the first place. That's stupid.
@lucasliso But anarchy is contrary to human instinct. No matter where or when you look, humans have always formed orderly communities with set rules and morals. Sure, they vary, but it's always some form of order- even if the world was plunged into anarchy tomorrow, we would be forming families, clans, villages, little communities within weeks.
@Greatkingrat88 I'm not against communities with their communal rules. I'm against people having the job of ruling others and telling them what to do, because the power will corrupt them, always. A neighborhood works fine without having a president. I'm against paying taxes. I'm against having police because everyone should just take care of each other. I'm against flags, national symbols, and national frontiers and borders, which are fictional to begin with. They are all useless, and stupid.
@lucasliso But history teaches us that no matter what we think, we have always formed larger governships than cummunities- from small tribal areas to kingdoms to the states of today. We naturally tend towards either following a leader, or leading ourselves. It's natural that a person with charisma, assertiveness and strength takes charge- it may be for the better or worse, but leadership is a natural thing in humans.
@Greatkingrat88 No its not. One thing is to follow a leader during a specific time or need. Like, we are all hungry and the guy that hunts better leads us into hunting a lot to get all the food we need. But countries, frontiers, laws. That is all an illusion. Flags come and go, so does countries, and laws don't really keep you safe. Having someone rule over you at tell you what you should do and not, that's not leadership, even if it was voted by a majority, there is a minority not represented.
@lucasliso Law and country is real enough. It has existed for hundreds- thousands- of years. Its presence is undeniable, and its effect on the people under it as well. How then can you call it an illusion?
@Greatkingrat88 Where is all that? No, it does not exists. People that define themselves as "American" or "German" or whatever, have no idea who they actually are. We are not our nationality, we are not our names. We are only the result of hundreds of accidents and chance events. Countries come and go. So does laws. Now its illegal to own a slave, 500 years ago it was standard issue. So yes, laws are an illusion and useless, because they change all the time. Why is it wrong...
@Greatkingrat88 ... to kill someone? Because its illegal or because its wrong? Not to mention that everyone is all gung-ho on the bible and the 10 commandements, "Thou shall not kill" right? Well, does it say: Unless you are in a war? Or, unless the other person is a killer himself? Not really. So, by following "Thou shall not kill" to the letter, it means that everyone that ever killed someone, like say a WW2 veteran, will go straight to hell. So yes, laws are an illusion because ...
@Greatkingrat88 ... people find ways to go arround them all the time. Nobody, ever, has followed every single law there is. We always break them, because we think that some of them are "meaningless" like say, jaywalking. Everyone has done it at least once. Is it illegal? Yes, but people does in anyway. We should not take advantage of others because is the right thing to do, not because a "law" says you shouldn't.
@lucasliso I'd really rather you did not pull god and divine "law" into this. That is a bronze age myth with zero evidence to it; law cannot be drawn from an irrational thing like faith.
We as a species have consistently set up laws, nations, kings- their presence and effect is undeniable. Nations give the people something to identify with, laws something to adhere to. law varies, certainly, but simply because it undeniably changes, one can't say they are not real.
@Greatkingrat88 Still most laws of equality are still not passed under religious plataforms. Like Equal sex marriage which is illegal in most parts of the world. Is there any logical, non religious reason that is not being legalized all over the place?
I'm not denying the effect that nations and kings had in history: I'm stating that they are not necessary to us, we do not need kings, presidents, nations or written laws. We just need each other, as equals, ruling ourselves, nobody ruling over us
@Greatkingrat88 ... Therefore, they state of an illusion. They come and go, they change all the time. And most of they time they are not really following it, not to mention that most of the laws are made more under the grounds of "I want to stay in power" or "more money for me and my friends" that under the grounds of "everyone is the same and therefore should have the same opportunities as everyone else". Like Veto power in the United Nations. Laws may "exists", but they are still illusions.
@lucasliso But rulership IS needful to us. Unless we elect our leaders democratically, SOMEBODY is bound to seize power- it has always been as such, and there is no indication it will ever be different. Necessary or not, there will always be governments and rulers. Better that they at least have an iota of fairness to them, that they please as many people as they can.
@Greatkingrat88 The only way SOMEBODY would be able to seize power is if people let someone rise above them. A single person alone cannot "rise" to power, he/she needs an army, and weapons, and things like that. If everyone is truly educated, and truly capable, then no, we need nobody to tell us what to do, and we all would realize it, and therefore it would be impossible for a single person to rise above others and "convince" them that he is "better suited" to make decitions for them. No need.
@lucasliso But people are oh so often content to let somebody lead them if he does something simple to please them. Hitler rose to power and became hugely popular because he restored german pride and made their economy boom. The people were all too happy to drink in every word he had.
It's a novel thought that a truly educated populace sgould be able to defyf rulership like that, but that's not how the world works. Some people are incqapable of a higher edcutation. Some people do no want it.
@Greatkingrat88 You have just strengthened my point. First, like you said Hitler restored GERMAN pride. If there is no Germany, then there is no pride to give in the first place. People is people, defined by themselves, not their "country" because borders were put there by people in the first place. Second, yes, people are uneducated, and some don't even want it. Is that right? No. We should all work together to change that human beings. Each one...
@Greatkingrat88 ... one does his/her own to change what is wrong about the world. Just because something is "the way it is" does not mean we should not strive to change it. If that were how people act, then today we would still believe that the Earth is flat and that the sun spins around it and not the other way around. No, just because reality sucks, does not mean that we should accept it. It means that we should strive to change it so it stops sucking. Anyone who does not, is stupid.
@lucasliso But nationality and nationalism will always exist, be it for a small county or for a nation at large. We are pack animals, and anything that gives us a sense of "us" and "them" we will readily accept. No amount of education or enlightenment will change this.
Not to mention that, and I stress this, most people are not capable of taking in higher education such as this. Most people are simple, and are not going to accept a school of thought such as this.
@Greatkingrat88 Not really. While the pack animal part is true, and anarchism does not deny it, people can live in communities without actually belonging to a "country" or having a sense of "the other". There were several cases of anarchists societies all over the world. Like the pirates of old times, to the Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War, and most recent, Trumbullplex in Detroit and Freetown Christiania in Denmark. Educationg can change thinking, it did so before, and it will do again..
@Greatkingrat88 ... over 200 years ago, everyone was convinced that Monarchies would last forever. Thousands of years ago, everyone was convinced that the Pharo and the King of Persia were gods. Things change. Education, equal distribution of recources, mass awareness of what matters, it can be done. Especially now with a tool as powerful as the Internet.
You may not believe that people will take higher education, but that is a hopeless path. We should not accept an impossible. But change it.
@lucasliso Pirates? Christiania? Poor examples, and incredibly small in comparison to national states and THEIR history. The state, the kingdom is not an artificial construct, at least not entirely- it reflects a social development in all peoples, all around the world. If states were not natural to us, would we not have shrugged them off?
Pirates... what awful examples you use. Pirates were lawless murderers and thieves, rapists, scum. Christiania is being shut down for being a drug den.
@Greatkingrat88 Pirates had the only democratic societies of their age. Captains were selected by the crew, and except in battle, during everyday life pirates were equals to the crew. They all decided where they should go, and what to do once there. No, it is you who have no information of the pirate society. They were ruthless to their enemies, sure, just as much as their State Run Armada enemies were to them. I would guess even less.
@Greatkingrat88 Christiania is not a "drug den". And if it were, it is not our right to say its wrong or not, its their choice. Anarchy societies run that way. Communities do what they want, and if someone within that community does not like it, he/she is welcome to leave at any time to a different community that does not do what he/she disliked. Also its easier because you don't have to go trough a hassle of getting a passport.
@Greatkingrat88 There are several people in the world today that are being forced to live under a state and country that is not their own, and are treated as criminals, when all they want is to have their own comunity and right to live as they want, without having to obey what to them is a foreigner authority that they do not recognize. The Basque of Spain is a perfect example. Tribes in Africa, which live in countries that didn't exists, they are just colonial territories turn countries.
@Greatkingrat88 Countries are unnatural because they are created by rulers, not by the people living there. Countries come and go, just like rulers. Germany did not exists as we know it until Bismarck.
You keep using propaganda like speech. Kingdom does not show a social development. There was a king, and his servants that worked the land, and had to give the fruits of their work for taxes. And were forced to obey or die a horrible death by a knight, that was a noble man to begin with.
@Greatkingrat88 Anarchists societies were not "Shrugged off" they were conquered in brutal and horrible ways. Killing everyone that lived there, burning everything they wrote, "dismembering" their memory so people would be scared of them.
Your answers just keep being uneducated, pre-suppossed terms. I have a major on political studies, so first study all aspects of how those "criminals" worked. Because thinking them as "criminals" is what a State would like you to think. Just consider ....
@Greatkingrat88 .... do you think the way you think because you chose, truly chose, to think and reason that way? Or is it because your "Country" your "State Infrastructure" raised you to think the way is better for them to think? Would you think differently if you lived someplace else?
Anarchism works as a system, its just that is so scary for a State, for Corporations to just fathom the idea that they can be cast away, that they would use all resources to them to convince others that ...
@Greatkingrat88 ... they should be cast away, destroyed as unnatural. I also noticed you did not comment on Anarchists Catalonia.
I also recommend that you try to study non-regular books and writings, don't keep just the official view of things. Pirates were "thieves" in the open, but they only stole from Countries, which stole all their gold and spices and supplies from Native Americans, like the Aztects and Mayans, to begin with. So Spain, Portugal and British ships were just as ruthless ....
@Greatkingrat88 ... thieves as the pirates. Its just that the English, the Spanish and the Portuguese had a better "sponsor".
One good documentary on how Anarchy can be applied today, and then increase it to the rest of society, would be "Fire the Boss" a documentary of factories run entirely by their employees, with not a single boss or CEO running things. They have a better production rate, and workers are happier, not to mention a decrease in work related accidents.
@Greatkingrat88 Fire the Boss can also be known in some places as "The Take" Like I mentioned, its a documentary filmed in 2004. Its premise is now being used by workers all over the world as a guideline on how to Self-Run a factory using an Anarchists system.
@lucasliso OK, I am not going to bother replying to ALL of that.
First off, it is just naive the way you glorify piracy. There were privateers, sponsored by the state to raid enemy ships, yes- but most pirates referred to as pirates were dangerous criminals, thieves and murderers at sea. Democratic, sure, but also ruthless and unscrupulous.
Secondly... isn't the state a necessity? If one country fell into anarchy, another country could easily exploit that.
@lucasliso Simply put, anarchy would, to work, have to be applied worldwide, agreed by all as the best solution. Otherwise, any other nation keeping its democratic or dictatorian rulership could easily exploit those who chose smaller, less easily defended areas.
And this is, I think, entirely impossible. We never achieve complete unity in anything.
And consider the achievements that the gathering of resources that only great states can provide. Protection. Advanced science. Social security,
States are as ruthless and demonic and killers just like a pirate would. Even states that are democratic have done that with its own population, or even taken the territory of other countries, like the United States did to Mexico and Hawaii. So again, pirates were just as bad as everyone else, but like I stated before, they had a bigger "sponsor". I'm not glorifying ALL of piracy, just as you would not justify ALL that a state does. Right? .....
@Greatkingrat88 About the worldwide comment, I belive that is true to say that every single form of State run government is also trying to apply itself world wide. Be it communism or Facism, and everything in between. The difference with Anarchy is that since is not run by a state but by people themeslves, its less noticable. Not to mention that Anarchy itslef can be practiced in a big variety of ways.
And I don't believe that it can only work if applied worldwide. Small anarchist ......
@Greatkingrat88 communities existed, exist now, and will exists in the future. Like the Romani people (often pejoratively called Gypsy), which do not recognize a state as their ruler, and do not desire to acquire a state of their own either.
As for the three points that you say that a state run society guarantees, it can be argued:
Advanced science: A State actually can deterr the advancement of science. If a scientist discovers something that could be dangerous to the state's ....
@Greatkingrat88 allies (and I don't mean bombs or anything, but simpler things like a different way to transmit electricity, or different fuel, and such). Even if cleaner energy can be applied right now, no state in the world is abandoning Fossil Fuels, even if they will need to evenually since it is not a source of energy that can be renewed. Just as one single example. Not to mention that to this day the USA government is keeping secret several of Tesla's discoveries. Shouldn't those ....
@Greatkingrat88 ... those papers be revealed, in the interest of the advancement of science?
As for Security and Protection, a state only offers that to specific group of people. Black people in the USA have been and will be discriminated against. Even if the written laws say that they are equal, they are still being discriminated not only by people, but by State run things like the police. This happens in a worldwide basis, in Russia is Armenians, in Japan is the Burakumin. ....
@Greatkingrat88 So said security that the state offers is limited and biased, therefore as defective as any other.
And we have also to add people that do not belong to the state they are in, and are being forced to live there, and follow that state's rules even if they have the right of self determination and identity. Every native american people from the Navajos to the Mapuches, or the Ainu and Ryukyuan in Japan, the Sami people in Norway and Sweeden, the Kurds in Iraq and Iran, the ....
@Greatkingrat88 ... aftermentioned Romani people all over Europe. Those people have no state, and some don't even desire to belong to one in the first place, be it someone else's or their own.
If a State takes advantage by taking over an anarchist region, said State is not democratic, is a Empire like state that wants to expand itself, and therefore should be shun by any and people. Even the ones living within it. It happened before, yes, and it was bloody and horrible. (The ....
@Greatkingrat88 conquest of the American continent for example.)
States come and go, their existance is actually limited to people. States need people, but people don't need the state. More often than not the shift from one state to another is a bloody and terrible struggle that leaves thousnads of people dead, the Balkans is a perfect example. But if we leave a place stateless, that struggle is not going to happen because there is no state to eliminate or change. There would ...
@Greatkingrat88 ... be Croatians, and there will be Serbians. But there will not be a "Croatia" or a "Serbia", and certainly no Yugoslavia to begin with, which was a kingdom, turned absolute state. There will just be people. Yes, they might still have conflicts with each other, but said conflicts do not need to be for a State or a National Idenity.
@Greatkingrat88 You should see Anarchy as the ultimate form of Democracy. What is Democracy to begin with:
Democracy is a form of government in which all citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. This includes equal and direct participation in the proposal, development and passage of rules and community regulations.
However, the democratic principle has also been expressed as the freedom to call something into being which did not exist before ....
@Greatkingrat88 which was not given and which therefore, strictly speaking, could not be known. This type of freedom, which is connected to human "natality," or the capacity to begin anew, sees democracy as "not only a political system but an ideal, an aspiration, really, intimately connected to and dependent upon a picture of what it is to be human. Of what it is a human should be to be fully human.
@Greatkingrat88 Equality and freedom have both been identified as important characteristics of democracy since ancient times. And Anarchy offers that in its most absolute form. No limitations that a State would give instead, like preventing same sex marriage as one common example.
Churchill clever? Am I missing something? Churchill was an idiot, all he was good at was making speeches and half of those he messed up, he's only known for his best speeches (I'm not sure he even wrote himself) and only became prime minister as he looked the part of a wartime leader.
Why was Napoleon and Stalin in there? Napoleon was a military genius and Stalin was smart enough to let his generals run the Army to win the Eastern front
Yes, Napolean was a military genius, but why is he in the history books? Because he failed to listen to the commanding officers under him to not attack Russia in winter. That is his "something dumb before you die."
And as for Stalin, he pretty much went, "Yeah, I know we just stopped Hitler for being a jerk of a dictator, but I bet you can't stop me from doing a lot of the same tings!"
Your reason for putting Jesus in makes sense, but why are Churchill and Einstein in there? Both were extremely smart individuals and had a major positive effect on history.
@MonisticWonder Chruchill wouldn't have done anything but piss people off if there wasn't a war. And Einstien failed grade something math....plus, he helped create the atomic bomb..or some of his ideas were used, but he tried to fix it by signing a petition for President Trigger Happy to not use it
@IdiotWithMovieMaker Einstein didn't fail math. Time reported on this. Google "did einstein actually fail a class" and it will bring up the Time article. And for the Atomic Bomb, all Einstein did was warn FDR that the Nazis were already working on it.
Don't know what to say about your ignorance of Churchill, the guy that told everyone how to prevent WWII, and was ignored.
Churchills idea to prevent the war was to hit first. He hated the idea of appeasment to the nazi's that his gov't was taking *which failed* so, yea, Churchill pissed a lot of ppl off, but he ws right. As for Einstien, his ideas were used and he was consulted. BTW, it wasn't FDR who dropped the bomb, it was Truman. Einstien, knowing the destructive power of the bombs, signed a petition along with many others to stop nuclear use
@IdiotWithMovieMaker I didn't say FDR dropped the bomb. Einstein warned FDR that the Nazis were making it. FDR ordered the Manhattan Project, Truman continued it. I'm not sure what you're arguing here, you're not contradicting anything I said.
@jayhoffer You can't condradict fact, you're kind of being a concieted know it all since you're basically trying to argue over what we both know, btw, Einstein did more than just warn FDR, he did help make it, his ideas were used, along with many others. As for Einstein failing math, well, incorrect knowledge is taught in schools, so I apologize for listening to me teachers.
@IdiotWithMovieMaker Wow... You've really got your head up your ass. I corrected you about Einstein, and corrected you about the A-Bomb. Einstein's theories were used, but he was denied the security clearance to work on it in July of 1940. No one was even allowed to consult with Einstein, as he was deemed a security risk. The only one being conceited here is you, I corrected something you said wrong. Not much more.
YOU USED A PICTURE OF THE MAN I WORSHIP IN A VIDEO ABOUT STUPID PEOPLE? HOW DARE YOU?!?! No, I am NOT talking about Jesus. I don't really care about that part. But... But... WALT DISNEY? REALLY?!
I'll have you know that Walt Disney died YEARS- no, DECADES before that sh*t was invented and would be horrified/ashamed at what people stick his name under. I'm not talking about the Disney COMPANY, I'm talking about WALT DISNEY-- the man who created all the greatest movies known to mankind and a theme park beyond description in awesome-ness.
@twistedpreference Um, YEAH... how come top banana didn't make it on the list? ...Then again, you'd need at least another 2 verses to show all the stupid things he did.
LOL, love the song, great pictures. Thanks for clarifying the bit on Jesus... that is a soft spot for many people.
You have a slight inconsistency in your description, saying he wasn't the son of God, but pulling a 180 on yourself and saying the idiots were the ones who nailed him to the cross. But the reason they did that was because they thought he was blaspheming, or claiming he was the son of God. So you're saying you don't believe Jesus was the son of God, but they shouldn't have crucified him for the same reason as what you believe. Which is it? :P
@groobert6456 You know, you can believe Jesus was just a man and not the son of god without wanting him dead. Just because you don't think Jesus was the son of god doesn' mean you hate his guts and think he got what was coming to him.
just because two people's beliefs are the same doesn't mean that if one person does something that the other would if they believe that it is a radical action that shouldn't have been taken so he is indeed correct in his statement tat " And the "dumb" ones were the ones who crucified him." and is right to state it
I understand what he is saying, i think he means that yes Jesus was a good man who help bring what little peace he could to the world, even though he wasn't the "son of god" . The stupid people that made history was the ones who killed him. In my opinion, if they hadn't killed him, no body would have thought twice about a crazy man claiming to be the son of god and the world would be a better place.
It shows that they're respectful and deserves respect in return. They probably didn't do it to be politically correct, but because they truly didn't want to offend anyone. You know, not everyone wants to be seen as a jackass.
J. Robert Oppenheimer(April 22, 1904 February 18, 1967) was an American theoretical physicist and professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley. He is best known for his role as the scientific director of the Manhattan Project, the World War II effort to develop the first nuclear weapons at the secret Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. For this reason he is remembered as "The Father of the Atomic Bomb".
Well, to be fair, Einstein DID make it possible for the nuclear bomb, had trouble with simple mathematics, and didn't speak until he was nine years old or something.
ok the scary thing is i'm in my familys history book... and yes it was for a stupid reason... no explanation... and this song mde me relize why i was put in there
I think it's quite arguable whether most of the people on this were dumb at all... I mean, Napoleon? He conquered Europe. He must have had something going for him.
It wasn't just luck. He was a brilliant military tactician, and he was willing to push his men to do things others weren't... he just didn't know when to stop.
Oh, ouch. I just got hit by a six-year-old's insult. I know this because I've cracked a history book, but then, you're probably not through school yet, are you?
Like the song, hate the video. Most of the men shown here were very wise, and intelligent. Some more to one side than the other, but very few of these men were lacking intelligence.
All around, the maker of this video seems ill-informed, or just simply enjoys mocking the dead.
Yoshimiko951 2 months ago
why does jesus look so skinny? he was well fed and muscular when he faked his death...
0IanMoone0 2 months ago
Many of the people you show is not at all dumb...well okay, mabye a little.
AreFlamingosPink 3 months ago
Thumbs up for the Arrogant Worms! :)
astra4nn 3 months ago
im going down in history as the only person to sneeze, cough, pee, shit their pants, fire a gun, all while being attacked by a bengal tiger
shankful1 3 months ago 2
Damn! I better do something incredibly stupid
Thiefenz 4 months ago
i'm learning and laughing.
TheLastHylianTitan 4 months ago
OK, now you are just being intentionally provocative aren't you? Martin Luther AND Jesus? You're lucky the bible commands us to be slow to anger and quick to forgive, my friend.
C4rbine398 5 months ago
@C4rbine398 Calm it. I can't explain Martin Luther, but read the description about Jesus.
RichAlBig 4 months ago
@tealfr LOL yeah that's why he's mentioned :)
dataquitosqueen 5 months ago
martin luther was not dumb he told about the gospel
tealfr 5 months ago
Go toFFjEPP! U RULEZ!
HolocuastMemory 5 months ago
Jesus went into the video becuase he made history. (And payed the price) please DONT do something dumb b4 u die. It will shorten your llife expectancy by your remaining years.
HolocuastMemory 5 months ago
You put Jesus in the video???? That was just wrong
SuperSavarese 6 months ago 2
@SuperSavarese Read the description.
TheDashingHero 6 months ago
No wonder why America is so famous, (i joke)
xxDarkGlovesxx 7 months ago 2
@xxDarkGlovesxx joke is hilarious NOT! Im cerial! its nought funny
HolocuastMemory 5 months ago
While I like the song, I'm offended by this for several reasons. First, I'm offended that you put Martin Luther in here because I am a Lutheran. Second, I was offended that Walt Disney was in here because he was a kind and generous man, which are qualities you never see in typical businessmen. Third, I can't understand why Albert Einstein is in here since he obviously wasn't dumb. I hope you just put them in here because they are famous people. Fortunately, I stopped watching before I got to th
darthvadersith514 9 months ago
@darthvadersith514 The song is poking fun at the stupid actions of the people. Just cause Einstein was smart doesn't mean that making the atomic bomb wasn't his admitted biggest mistake and allowing them to fire it not knowing if the Nuclear reaction would stop or not is pretty stupid if you ask me..
TalesOfCartha 7 months ago
Comment removed
douggw 6 months ago
Comment removed
douggw 6 months ago
@darthvadersith514 Albert Einstein was a drop out in coolage or high school(forget what one) because he failed math plus the whole atomic bomb thing
douggw 6 months ago
@darthvadersith514 u stopped watching cuz you had a heart attack and rolled in your grave as Adolf Hitler marched into the grave with you in his vagina
HolocuastMemory 5 months ago
@darthvadersith514 Notice Albert Einstein's picture first appeared with the lyrics, "Clever people wouldn't even try", implying that he was clever.
jtv57 1 month ago
Uh, I think putting Jesus in here could be considered blasphemous
frankydman 10 months ago
Wow. I was mightily surprised to see Gustav Vasa added to this, and even more surprised to see ex-prime minister Göran Persson added as well (right in between Hitler and Stalin- you really must not like him! :D). Are you a fellow swede?
Greatkingrat88 10 months ago 2
@Greatkingrat88 Indeed I am ;)
tOFFjEPP 10 months ago
@tOFFjEPP Vilken överraskning, va! :D
Greatkingrat88 10 months ago
@tOFFjEPP Sweede, German or Russian, all politics are dumb people.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso Difference is, Hitler and Stalin were history's greatest monsters. The swedish prime minister in between was sort of an oaf, but he was elected and ruled democratically.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 There were a lot of greatest monsters than Hitler and Stalin, they are just less popular.
And regardless of being elected democratically, the moment a politician starts doing unpopular things, they stop being democratic. So its down to the same: Every politician is stupid.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso You generalize.Oh how you generalize. There are many competent politicians out there- the bad ones just get all the spotlight.
Democracy is a shitty way to rule a nation, but it is the best option available to us.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Not really. Politics, as a whole, is stupid. We know half of what they do when we know about it. And if we add to that, that we only know what they do half the time, it adds up to we not really knowing ever what is actually going on. And since we are the ones voting them, we are not really voting anything that we know. No political problem in the world was ever solved by a politician, especially not when they assume power.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso Bitter much?
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 I don't understand the last comment.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso You sound like you had some personal grudge against politicians. Why? Are you bitter towards them?
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 I'm an Anarchist. I don't believe in any form of government in which people do not represent themselves completely. Elected politicians, even if democratically elected, will still hold more power than the people themselves, even if the people get upset and want to make him quit. Political and economical crisis means that democratically elected leaders tend to do unpopular things, and still remain in power. Power that people gave them in the first place. That's stupid.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso But anarchy is contrary to human instinct. No matter where or when you look, humans have always formed orderly communities with set rules and morals. Sure, they vary, but it's always some form of order- even if the world was plunged into anarchy tomorrow, we would be forming families, clans, villages, little communities within weeks.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 I'm not against communities with their communal rules. I'm against people having the job of ruling others and telling them what to do, because the power will corrupt them, always. A neighborhood works fine without having a president. I'm against paying taxes. I'm against having police because everyone should just take care of each other. I'm against flags, national symbols, and national frontiers and borders, which are fictional to begin with. They are all useless, and stupid.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso But history teaches us that no matter what we think, we have always formed larger governships than cummunities- from small tribal areas to kingdoms to the states of today. We naturally tend towards either following a leader, or leading ourselves. It's natural that a person with charisma, assertiveness and strength takes charge- it may be for the better or worse, but leadership is a natural thing in humans.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 No its not. One thing is to follow a leader during a specific time or need. Like, we are all hungry and the guy that hunts better leads us into hunting a lot to get all the food we need. But countries, frontiers, laws. That is all an illusion. Flags come and go, so does countries, and laws don't really keep you safe. Having someone rule over you at tell you what you should do and not, that's not leadership, even if it was voted by a majority, there is a minority not represented.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso Law and country is real enough. It has existed for hundreds- thousands- of years. Its presence is undeniable, and its effect on the people under it as well. How then can you call it an illusion?
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Where is all that? No, it does not exists. People that define themselves as "American" or "German" or whatever, have no idea who they actually are. We are not our nationality, we are not our names. We are only the result of hundreds of accidents and chance events. Countries come and go. So does laws. Now its illegal to own a slave, 500 years ago it was standard issue. So yes, laws are an illusion and useless, because they change all the time. Why is it wrong...
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... to kill someone? Because its illegal or because its wrong? Not to mention that everyone is all gung-ho on the bible and the 10 commandements, "Thou shall not kill" right? Well, does it say: Unless you are in a war? Or, unless the other person is a killer himself? Not really. So, by following "Thou shall not kill" to the letter, it means that everyone that ever killed someone, like say a WW2 veteran, will go straight to hell. So yes, laws are an illusion because ...
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... people find ways to go arround them all the time. Nobody, ever, has followed every single law there is. We always break them, because we think that some of them are "meaningless" like say, jaywalking. Everyone has done it at least once. Is it illegal? Yes, but people does in anyway. We should not take advantage of others because is the right thing to do, not because a "law" says you shouldn't.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso I'd really rather you did not pull god and divine "law" into this. That is a bronze age myth with zero evidence to it; law cannot be drawn from an irrational thing like faith.
We as a species have consistently set up laws, nations, kings- their presence and effect is undeniable. Nations give the people something to identify with, laws something to adhere to. law varies, certainly, but simply because it undeniably changes, one can't say they are not real.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Still most laws of equality are still not passed under religious plataforms. Like Equal sex marriage which is illegal in most parts of the world. Is there any logical, non religious reason that is not being legalized all over the place?
I'm not denying the effect that nations and kings had in history: I'm stating that they are not necessary to us, we do not need kings, presidents, nations or written laws. We just need each other, as equals, ruling ourselves, nobody ruling over us
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... Therefore, they state of an illusion. They come and go, they change all the time. And most of they time they are not really following it, not to mention that most of the laws are made more under the grounds of "I want to stay in power" or "more money for me and my friends" that under the grounds of "everyone is the same and therefore should have the same opportunities as everyone else". Like Veto power in the United Nations. Laws may "exists", but they are still illusions.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso But rulership IS needful to us. Unless we elect our leaders democratically, SOMEBODY is bound to seize power- it has always been as such, and there is no indication it will ever be different. Necessary or not, there will always be governments and rulers. Better that they at least have an iota of fairness to them, that they please as many people as they can.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 The only way SOMEBODY would be able to seize power is if people let someone rise above them. A single person alone cannot "rise" to power, he/she needs an army, and weapons, and things like that. If everyone is truly educated, and truly capable, then no, we need nobody to tell us what to do, and we all would realize it, and therefore it would be impossible for a single person to rise above others and "convince" them that he is "better suited" to make decitions for them. No need.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso But people are oh so often content to let somebody lead them if he does something simple to please them. Hitler rose to power and became hugely popular because he restored german pride and made their economy boom. The people were all too happy to drink in every word he had.
It's a novel thought that a truly educated populace sgould be able to defyf rulership like that, but that's not how the world works. Some people are incqapable of a higher edcutation. Some people do no want it.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 You have just strengthened my point. First, like you said Hitler restored GERMAN pride. If there is no Germany, then there is no pride to give in the first place. People is people, defined by themselves, not their "country" because borders were put there by people in the first place. Second, yes, people are uneducated, and some don't even want it. Is that right? No. We should all work together to change that human beings. Each one...
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... one does his/her own to change what is wrong about the world. Just because something is "the way it is" does not mean we should not strive to change it. If that were how people act, then today we would still believe that the Earth is flat and that the sun spins around it and not the other way around. No, just because reality sucks, does not mean that we should accept it. It means that we should strive to change it so it stops sucking. Anyone who does not, is stupid.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso But nationality and nationalism will always exist, be it for a small county or for a nation at large. We are pack animals, and anything that gives us a sense of "us" and "them" we will readily accept. No amount of education or enlightenment will change this.
Not to mention that, and I stress this, most people are not capable of taking in higher education such as this. Most people are simple, and are not going to accept a school of thought such as this.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Not really. While the pack animal part is true, and anarchism does not deny it, people can live in communities without actually belonging to a "country" or having a sense of "the other". There were several cases of anarchists societies all over the world. Like the pirates of old times, to the Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War, and most recent, Trumbullplex in Detroit and Freetown Christiania in Denmark. Educationg can change thinking, it did so before, and it will do again..
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... over 200 years ago, everyone was convinced that Monarchies would last forever. Thousands of years ago, everyone was convinced that the Pharo and the King of Persia were gods. Things change. Education, equal distribution of recources, mass awareness of what matters, it can be done. Especially now with a tool as powerful as the Internet.
You may not believe that people will take higher education, but that is a hopeless path. We should not accept an impossible. But change it.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso Pirates? Christiania? Poor examples, and incredibly small in comparison to national states and THEIR history. The state, the kingdom is not an artificial construct, at least not entirely- it reflects a social development in all peoples, all around the world. If states were not natural to us, would we not have shrugged them off?
Pirates... what awful examples you use. Pirates were lawless murderers and thieves, rapists, scum. Christiania is being shut down for being a drug den.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Pirates had the only democratic societies of their age. Captains were selected by the crew, and except in battle, during everyday life pirates were equals to the crew. They all decided where they should go, and what to do once there. No, it is you who have no information of the pirate society. They were ruthless to their enemies, sure, just as much as their State Run Armada enemies were to them. I would guess even less.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Christiania is not a "drug den". And if it were, it is not our right to say its wrong or not, its their choice. Anarchy societies run that way. Communities do what they want, and if someone within that community does not like it, he/she is welcome to leave at any time to a different community that does not do what he/she disliked. Also its easier because you don't have to go trough a hassle of getting a passport.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 There are several people in the world today that are being forced to live under a state and country that is not their own, and are treated as criminals, when all they want is to have their own comunity and right to live as they want, without having to obey what to them is a foreigner authority that they do not recognize. The Basque of Spain is a perfect example. Tribes in Africa, which live in countries that didn't exists, they are just colonial territories turn countries.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Countries are unnatural because they are created by rulers, not by the people living there. Countries come and go, just like rulers. Germany did not exists as we know it until Bismarck.
You keep using propaganda like speech. Kingdom does not show a social development. There was a king, and his servants that worked the land, and had to give the fruits of their work for taxes. And were forced to obey or die a horrible death by a knight, that was a noble man to begin with.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Anarchists societies were not "Shrugged off" they were conquered in brutal and horrible ways. Killing everyone that lived there, burning everything they wrote, "dismembering" their memory so people would be scared of them.
Your answers just keep being uneducated, pre-suppossed terms. I have a major on political studies, so first study all aspects of how those "criminals" worked. Because thinking them as "criminals" is what a State would like you to think. Just consider ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 .... do you think the way you think because you chose, truly chose, to think and reason that way? Or is it because your "Country" your "State Infrastructure" raised you to think the way is better for them to think? Would you think differently if you lived someplace else?
Anarchism works as a system, its just that is so scary for a State, for Corporations to just fathom the idea that they can be cast away, that they would use all resources to them to convince others that ...
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... they should be cast away, destroyed as unnatural. I also noticed you did not comment on Anarchists Catalonia.
I also recommend that you try to study non-regular books and writings, don't keep just the official view of things. Pirates were "thieves" in the open, but they only stole from Countries, which stole all their gold and spices and supplies from Native Americans, like the Aztects and Mayans, to begin with. So Spain, Portugal and British ships were just as ruthless ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... thieves as the pirates. Its just that the English, the Spanish and the Portuguese had a better "sponsor".
One good documentary on how Anarchy can be applied today, and then increase it to the rest of society, would be "Fire the Boss" a documentary of factories run entirely by their employees, with not a single boss or CEO running things. They have a better production rate, and workers are happier, not to mention a decrease in work related accidents.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Fire the Boss can also be known in some places as "The Take" Like I mentioned, its a documentary filmed in 2004. Its premise is now being used by workers all over the world as a guideline on how to Self-Run a factory using an Anarchists system.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@lucasliso OK, I am not going to bother replying to ALL of that.
First off, it is just naive the way you glorify piracy. There were privateers, sponsored by the state to raid enemy ships, yes- but most pirates referred to as pirates were dangerous criminals, thieves and murderers at sea. Democratic, sure, but also ruthless and unscrupulous.
Secondly... isn't the state a necessity? If one country fell into anarchy, another country could easily exploit that.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@lucasliso Simply put, anarchy would, to work, have to be applied worldwide, agreed by all as the best solution. Otherwise, any other nation keeping its democratic or dictatorian rulership could easily exploit those who chose smaller, less easily defended areas.
And this is, I think, entirely impossible. We never achieve complete unity in anything.
And consider the achievements that the gathering of resources that only great states can provide. Protection. Advanced science. Social security,
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Prepare for another long answer ;)
States are as ruthless and demonic and killers just like a pirate would. Even states that are democratic have done that with its own population, or even taken the territory of other countries, like the United States did to Mexico and Hawaii. So again, pirates were just as bad as everyone else, but like I stated before, they had a bigger "sponsor". I'm not glorifying ALL of piracy, just as you would not justify ALL that a state does. Right? .....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 About the worldwide comment, I belive that is true to say that every single form of State run government is also trying to apply itself world wide. Be it communism or Facism, and everything in between. The difference with Anarchy is that since is not run by a state but by people themeslves, its less noticable. Not to mention that Anarchy itslef can be practiced in a big variety of ways.
And I don't believe that it can only work if applied worldwide. Small anarchist ......
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 communities existed, exist now, and will exists in the future. Like the Romani people (often pejoratively called Gypsy), which do not recognize a state as their ruler, and do not desire to acquire a state of their own either.
As for the three points that you say that a state run society guarantees, it can be argued:
Advanced science: A State actually can deterr the advancement of science. If a scientist discovers something that could be dangerous to the state's ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 allies (and I don't mean bombs or anything, but simpler things like a different way to transmit electricity, or different fuel, and such). Even if cleaner energy can be applied right now, no state in the world is abandoning Fossil Fuels, even if they will need to evenually since it is not a source of energy that can be renewed. Just as one single example. Not to mention that to this day the USA government is keeping secret several of Tesla's discoveries. Shouldn't those ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... those papers be revealed, in the interest of the advancement of science?
As for Security and Protection, a state only offers that to specific group of people. Black people in the USA have been and will be discriminated against. Even if the written laws say that they are equal, they are still being discriminated not only by people, but by State run things like the police. This happens in a worldwide basis, in Russia is Armenians, in Japan is the Burakumin. ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 So said security that the state offers is limited and biased, therefore as defective as any other.
And we have also to add people that do not belong to the state they are in, and are being forced to live there, and follow that state's rules even if they have the right of self determination and identity. Every native american people from the Navajos to the Mapuches, or the Ainu and Ryukyuan in Japan, the Sami people in Norway and Sweeden, the Kurds in Iraq and Iran, the ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... aftermentioned Romani people all over Europe. Those people have no state, and some don't even desire to belong to one in the first place, be it someone else's or their own.
If a State takes advantage by taking over an anarchist region, said State is not democratic, is a Empire like state that wants to expand itself, and therefore should be shun by any and people. Even the ones living within it. It happened before, yes, and it was bloody and horrible. (The ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 conquest of the American continent for example.)
States come and go, their existance is actually limited to people. States need people, but people don't need the state. More often than not the shift from one state to another is a bloody and terrible struggle that leaves thousnads of people dead, the Balkans is a perfect example. But if we leave a place stateless, that struggle is not going to happen because there is no state to eliminate or change. There would ...
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 ... be Croatians, and there will be Serbians. But there will not be a "Croatia" or a "Serbia", and certainly no Yugoslavia to begin with, which was a kingdom, turned absolute state. There will just be people. Yes, they might still have conflicts with each other, but said conflicts do not need to be for a State or a National Idenity.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 You should see Anarchy as the ultimate form of Democracy. What is Democracy to begin with:
Democracy is a form of government in which all citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. This includes equal and direct participation in the proposal, development and passage of rules and community regulations.
However, the democratic principle has also been expressed as the freedom to call something into being which did not exist before ....
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 which was not given and which therefore, strictly speaking, could not be known. This type of freedom, which is connected to human "natality," or the capacity to begin anew, sees democracy as "not only a political system but an ideal, an aspiration, really, intimately connected to and dependent upon a picture of what it is to be human. Of what it is a human should be to be fully human.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 Equality and freedom have both been identified as important characteristics of democracy since ancient times. And Anarchy offers that in its most absolute form. No limitations that a State would give instead, like preventing same sex marriage as one common example.
lucasliso 9 months ago
@tOFFjEPP Why is Bush not in here??? Cmon if thats not the most obvious one... >.>
USABonez 4 months ago
@Greatkingrat88 är du svensk??
Ichamjag 9 months ago
@Ichamjag Jag är svensk, o ja.
Greatkingrat88 9 months ago
Hey I find this offensive Churchill was one of my mentors, this song made me mad lol
USABonez 11 months ago
Churchill clever? Am I missing something? Churchill was an idiot, all he was good at was making speeches and half of those he messed up, he's only known for his best speeches (I'm not sure he even wrote himself) and only became prime minister as he looked the part of a wartime leader.
mouseycou 11 months ago
@mouseycou How was churchill a idiot? Do you wanna elaborate on that comment? I think churchill was quite intelligent.
USABonez 11 months ago
2:21 lol something dumb before you die American Idol am i the only one who caught that?
redwing460 1 year ago
Gustav Vasa and Göran Persson? E du också svensk?
Sw3denGamer 1 year ago
@mysterygirl154 oopss xOO
Mabe i could make history for that one ;)
lol! ( sry 4 the crummy joke -.- But it basicly meant that I am stupid :p )
gbasp10 1 year ago
it was insulting when they put Jesus at the end! -.-
gbasp10 1 year ago
@gbasp10 You didn't read the poster's comments did you.
mysterygirl154 1 year ago
Why was Napoleon and Stalin in there? Napoleon was a military genius and Stalin was smart enough to let his generals run the Army to win the Eastern front
Potts132 1 year ago
Comment removed
Kitsufox 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Potts132
Yes, Napolean was a military genius, but why is he in the history books? Because he failed to listen to the commanding officers under him to not attack Russia in winter. That is his "something dumb before you die."
And as for Stalin, he pretty much went, "Yeah, I know we just stopped Hitler for being a jerk of a dictator, but I bet you can't stop me from doing a lot of the same tings!"
Kitsufox 1 year ago
Dumb people some went into politics
CuttlefishPi 1 year ago
why are you disrespecting the dead?
Coldod23 1 year ago
@Coldod23 Look at hte upload date. Jesus, some peopel are dumb *cough* you *cough*.
SniperViper1000 11 months ago
why is michael jackson in there?
we all loved MJ
and know the media was only making money off him cuz wen he was dead, people stopped wit the fake news cuz he was already dead
so please be smart
Coldod23 1 year ago
@Coldod23 because while he was smart he was also stupid. i think you should all watch the documentary stupidity. it is very informative
mattmanofblues 1 year ago
Perhaps when you can both spell properly this pointless argument will be over.
Shadowclaw363 1 year ago
You said exactly what i said...in different words. I said his theories were used, as did you...so i fail to see the issue.
IdiotWithMovieMaker 1 year ago
Your reason for putting Jesus in makes sense, but why are Churchill and Einstein in there? Both were extremely smart individuals and had a major positive effect on history.
MonisticWonder 1 year ago
@MonisticWonder Chruchill wouldn't have done anything but piss people off if there wasn't a war. And Einstien failed grade something math....plus, he helped create the atomic bomb..or some of his ideas were used, but he tried to fix it by signing a petition for President Trigger Happy to not use it
IdiotWithMovieMaker 1 year ago
@IdiotWithMovieMaker Einstein didn't fail math. Time reported on this. Google "did einstein actually fail a class" and it will bring up the Time article. And for the Atomic Bomb, all Einstein did was warn FDR that the Nazis were already working on it.
Don't know what to say about your ignorance of Churchill, the guy that told everyone how to prevent WWII, and was ignored.
jayhoffer 1 year ago
@jayhoffer
Churchills idea to prevent the war was to hit first. He hated the idea of appeasment to the nazi's that his gov't was taking *which failed* so, yea, Churchill pissed a lot of ppl off, but he ws right. As for Einstien, his ideas were used and he was consulted. BTW, it wasn't FDR who dropped the bomb, it was Truman. Einstien, knowing the destructive power of the bombs, signed a petition along with many others to stop nuclear use
IdiotWithMovieMaker 1 year ago
@IdiotWithMovieMaker I didn't say FDR dropped the bomb. Einstein warned FDR that the Nazis were making it. FDR ordered the Manhattan Project, Truman continued it. I'm not sure what you're arguing here, you're not contradicting anything I said.
jayhoffer 1 year ago
@jayhoffer You can't condradict fact, you're kind of being a concieted know it all since you're basically trying to argue over what we both know, btw, Einstein did more than just warn FDR, he did help make it, his ideas were used, along with many others. As for Einstein failing math, well, incorrect knowledge is taught in schools, so I apologize for listening to me teachers.
IdiotWithMovieMaker 1 year ago
@IdiotWithMovieMaker Wow... You've really got your head up your ass. I corrected you about Einstein, and corrected you about the A-Bomb. Einstein's theories were used, but he was denied the security clearance to work on it in July of 1940. No one was even allowed to consult with Einstein, as he was deemed a security risk. The only one being conceited here is you, I corrected something you said wrong. Not much more.
jayhoffer 1 year ago
@theboogiemanoftoday Read the motherfucking description before you talk, asshole.
TheDocJayz 1 year ago
@mullahgrrl
He already is, his nose is removable
Shadowclaw363 1 year ago
How the f*** was Einstein an idiot!?!
itjustme43 1 year ago
@itjustme43
I think he's there beacuse the song also says "clever people wouldn't even try"
ZebaSzp 1 year ago
OK, Churchill was a genius... but I'll let it pass considering how funny the song is.
jayhoffer 1 year ago
You know what would be great? Michael Jacksson potatohead!
Mullahgrrl 1 year ago
Einstein???!!
imhotep41 1 year ago
1:48 ...
mxp67 1 year ago
so walt disney stupid for the attemption of time traveling aka freezing himself? LMAO!!!
ddsfriend 2 years ago
Being a history buff let me explain things to some people
Luther is stupid because he challenged the pope a bad idea in 1514 BTW I hate all religion
Thunderbug69 2 years ago
YOU USED A PICTURE OF THE MAN I WORSHIP IN A VIDEO ABOUT STUPID PEOPLE? HOW DARE YOU?!?! No, I am NOT talking about Jesus. I don't really care about that part. But... But... WALT DISNEY? REALLY?!
TotalPirateLuvva 2 years ago
@TotalPirateLuvva
Dude... Disney makes bands like Jonas Brothers and Hillary duff and calls them "Rock bands"
You're kidding right
shadowmare97 2 years ago
I'll have you know that Walt Disney died YEARS- no, DECADES before that sh*t was invented and would be horrified/ashamed at what people stick his name under. I'm not talking about the Disney COMPANY, I'm talking about WALT DISNEY-- the man who created all the greatest movies known to mankind and a theme park beyond description in awesome-ness.
TotalPirateLuvva 2 years ago
@TotalPirateLuvva he also practicaly enslaved people
spinynorman230 1 year ago
Albert Einstein a stupid man? are stupid or is it me?
MrWisseguy 2 years ago
Martin Luther? Screw you.
SasukeHeavenCurse354 2 years ago
wow i don't know... i'm a christian and that was a funny song suck it up
jsergeew 2 years ago
i say we befriend the idiots then when thay have their backs turned we stick a knife in it!
Dev9600 2 years ago
This video should have ended with a picture of President Bush :P !!!!!
twistedpreference 2 years ago 46
@twistedpreference Um, YEAH... how come top banana didn't make it on the list? ...Then again, you'd need at least another 2 verses to show all the stupid things he did.
LOL, love the song, great pictures. Thanks for clarifying the bit on Jesus... that is a soft spot for many people.
PatrioticInsurgent 1 year ago
You have a slight inconsistency in your description, saying he wasn't the son of God, but pulling a 180 on yourself and saying the idiots were the ones who nailed him to the cross. But the reason they did that was because they thought he was blaspheming, or claiming he was the son of God. So you're saying you don't believe Jesus was the son of God, but they shouldn't have crucified him for the same reason as what you believe. Which is it? :P
groobert6456 2 years ago
@groobert6456 You know, you can believe Jesus was just a man and not the son of god without wanting him dead. Just because you don't think Jesus was the son of god doesn' mean you hate his guts and think he got what was coming to him.
Meinfuhrerhoffman 2 years ago
I agree. It's entirely possible to disagree with the dogma while still believing in his core philosophy.
Although, to the vid poster, sometimes it's just best to avoid opening a can of worms altogether
boredmuskoxen 2 years ago
that is totally correct!
MrWisseguy 2 years ago
just because two people's beliefs are the same doesn't mean that if one person does something that the other would if they believe that it is a radical action that shouldn't have been taken so he is indeed correct in his statement tat " And the "dumb" ones were the ones who crucified him." and is right to state it
Glacierstar 2 years ago
I understand what he is saying, i think he means that yes Jesus was a good man who help bring what little peace he could to the world, even though he wasn't the "son of god" . The stupid people that made history was the ones who killed him. In my opinion, if they hadn't killed him, no body would have thought twice about a crazy man claiming to be the son of god and the world would be a better place.
thenight321 2 years ago
@groobert6456,
You need to ask mate? He just stopped arguing on this comment post. Which means lying and agreeing with everyone : )
ACLleader 2 years ago
To the guy that made the video, Whats with the apology?
Screw being politically correct.
I think you did a good job on the video.
Akaoushi 2 years ago 4
It shows that they're respectful and deserves respect in return. They probably didn't do it to be politically correct, but because they truly didn't want to offend anyone. You know, not everyone wants to be seen as a jackass.
darkbloodmay 2 years ago
Theres that or maybe some people are too over sensitive about what they think they see.
I dont know, I saw nothing wrong here.
Akaoushi 2 years ago
that was great but the jesus at the end was not neccisary
deathspear25 2 years ago
Did you read what they said? If you did, you wouldn't have even said that.
darkbloodmay 2 years ago
it wasnt there when i posted so f off?
deathspear25 2 years ago
Please,get a sense of humor,deathspear....jesus nailed the whole video...pun intended
Dalbert342 2 years ago 3
how was einstien stupid?
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
He was the "clever people" part.
missT11 2 years ago
I took it as being stupid for greating the atomic bomb even though he was against war and violence.
darkbloodmay 2 years ago
J. Robert Oppenheimer(April 22, 1904 February 18, 1967) was an American theoretical physicist and professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley. He is best known for his role as the scientific director of the Manhattan Project, the World War II effort to develop the first nuclear weapons at the secret Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. For this reason he is remembered as "The Father of the Atomic Bomb".
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
There for he is an idiot
Explorer360 2 years ago
micheal jackson was one of the stupidest idiots IN THE WORLD
jolypolyolson 2 years ago
mike was sick
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
MICHEAL JACKSON AINT STUPID
SexyNinjaPickle 2 years ago
fuck micheal
TheTuckmonster 2 years ago
einstein? wtf is he doing in there lol.
0:38 terry fox should not be in there i shake my head to that.
still great video and great music
glaxko 2 years ago
Well, to be fair, Einstein DID make it possible for the nuclear bomb, had trouble with simple mathematics, and didn't speak until he was nine years old or something.
Breakingbenjamin42 2 years ago
true, but he is also one of the smartest people in history.
glaxko 2 years ago 2
Debatable.
Breakingbenjamin42 2 years ago 8
ok the scary thing is i'm in my familys history book... and yes it was for a stupid reason... no explanation... and this song mde me relize why i was put in there
naters773 2 years ago
this is a load of crap id have 50 books writen on me if all u need was to do someing dum
holyninjacat 2 years ago 2
dude if this song is accurate about how u make history im garrenteed a spot in the history books lol
wwwaaarrrggghhh 2 years ago
or Bush
spinynorman230 2 years ago
some people really need to read history
pheonixmon1 2 years ago
I think it's quite arguable whether most of the people on this were dumb at all... I mean, Napoleon? He conquered Europe. He must have had something going for him.
colossus999 2 years ago
yea "Dum" luck
alchamistcross 2 years ago
It wasn't just luck. He was a brilliant military tactician, and he was willing to push his men to do things others weren't... he just didn't know when to stop.
colossus999 2 years ago
yes thus he was stupid
alchamistcross 2 years ago
how would u know all this u nerd
buckyb12rules 2 years ago
Oh, ouch. I just got hit by a six-year-old's insult. I know this because I've cracked a history book, but then, you're probably not through school yet, are you?
colossus999 2 years ago