if you really need proof,(do an experiment) ...put your headphone(choose one earphone, only one), plug into your ear, make special attention to the volume(do not let others hear what is coming from chosen earphone), while one earphone is inside, try to make conversation with others, but speak only words, spoken to you by your friend through selected earphone. DO the observation. Then, watch all ( if you can) media, where George W Bush speaks to the journalists.....Have fun.But do not freak out.
DUDE I WAS LIKE 6 AND AS AN ARAB I SAW TRUCKS WITH MISSILES ON THEM I ASKED MY MOM WHAT THAT WAS SHE TOLD ME SADDAM HAS TO DESTROY HIS WEAPONS BECAUSE AMERICA SAID SO ... SO I ASKED THE MAGICAL QUESTION ... WHY? ... and now im here <3 subbed!
Why hasn't this man and Tony Blair been arrested and tried for lying to their public and taking advantage of the military to line their own pockets? There is a lot of blood on their hands and it sickens me to think they will live out their old age very rich and comfortable while children grow up without their fathers because Bush and Blair sent them to die in vain.
"U.N. arms inspectors are privately complaining about the quality of U.S. intelligence and accusing the United States of sending them on wild-goose chases. ... The inspectors have become so frustrated trying to chase down unspecific or ambiguous U.S. leads that they've begun to express that anger privately in no uncertain terms. U.N. sources have told CBS News that American tips have lead to one dead end after another." SEE LINK IN VIDEO INFO
"U.N. arms inspectors are privately complaining about the quality of U.S. intelligence and accusing the United States of sending them on wild-goose chases. ... The inspectors have become so frustrated trying to chase down unspecific or ambiguous U.S. leads that they've begun to express that anger privately in no uncertain terms. U.N. sources have told CBS News that American tips have lead to one dead end after another." SEE LINK IN VIDEO INFO
@Gradivus375 "By the time President Bush ordered U.S. troops to disarm Saddam Hussein of the deadly weapons he was allegedly trying to build, every piece of fresh evidence had been tested -- and disproved -- by U.N. inspectors, according to a report commissioned by the president" Panel: U.S. Ignored Work of U.N. Arms Inspectors By Dafna Linzer Washington Post Staff Writer (see link in the video info)
@Gradivus375 Stop desperately trying to make excuses for this man. There is no place in Iraq that Saddam "didn't let the inspectors in" (into) So either way, it is a lie. What Bush is saying is a lie.
murdering usa &isreal just leave Iran the fuck alone ! they are in their own country minding their own business ! the only ones causing shit is isreal murdering Palestinians and usa murdering anyone who has oil or anything they want. bush out obama in = and now its a racist black guy incharge thats guna start ww3 either in iran or in the usa itself ! and for the record the inspectors were there & didnt find shit it was on the fucking news, strange shithead bush says they werent there
LEgalize HEMP!!!! Death to Israel LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAEL!!!! LEGALIZE HEMP!!! DEATH TO ISRAeL!!!!
representaive press represents the looney left anti semetic scum who try desperatly to harm americas support for israel. just read the comments on this channel to see the truth about this leftwing anti semite!!!!!
Bush exceeded his authority and lied to Congress using the most flimsy piece of intelligence that he could scrape up. HIs advisors knew that the evidence he used was bogus.
No Democrat stood up and called him a liar while he spoke to Congress.
People in this country are divided into factions and don't hold their elected officials accountable. Instead they argue on blogs and you tube and get nothing done.
Destroy the bankers and socially misfit bureaucrats and once again uphold a nation of producers living off the land in peace...
gasoline created our freakishly large world population and surely it will destroy it. Except to the few odd people who learn to live off the land in the city or in the country!!!
We invaded Iraq bc Saddam tried to kill daddy Bush back in '93, after the Gulf War! It was a personal vendetta on Bush's part, also known as "Texas Justice", and he believed that in order avenge his family name and his father he had to do it, to go after Saddam and he used the United States military to pull it off and the US economy to fund it!
He put his own interests ahead of the countries interests and the very security of the United States!! He should have been impeached a long time ago...
SpookeyR rasist maggot you should have been an abortion save the state money raising a reeeeeetarded fuckwit liberal OWNED again
movie fan?? watch 12 monkeys starring Bruce Willis and brad pitt , its about how Bruce has to go back and forth thru time to find a cure for a virus that decimates the human race, a virus released by a bunny hugs liberal in order to save planet earth .sums up the left mentality perfectly
He should have been removed diplomatically! And that could have happened and if you want to blame Bill Clinton for that then fine but, fear mongering about liberals, especially coming from A BARELY LITERATE politically ignorant jackass such as yourself, doesn't do anything but prove that you are wrong!!
So, it's in the national interest to remove a dictator? NOT the reason W gave, tho, is it? You have any Kurdish friends? Doubt it. You have any muslim friends? Doubt it. You have any friends?... W did a bait and switch. 4000 + US military deaths. Go talk to a vet, and see how they feel about this kind of crap.
...or as long as he and his ilk were in charge. And that is in our National interest how? Because Iraq is a great vacation spot? Because we buy all our consumer goods from them? Because we borrow money from them? ... Oh, yeah, it's about OIL. Again. But this time, w/ a piddly "Coalition of the Willing", and the US footing the enormous bill, we went ahead.. to make sure Iraqis can vote? I thought it was WMD, the "mushroom cloud".. bait and switch means, we go in for WMD, then say "Freedom
i still thing it was just in cause, but i do believe after removal and successful election, we should have GTFO, but thats not to say other people in congress didnt have plans to get their hands on oil..but we citizens, citizen/soldiers, and soldiers all believe in the same cause, and thats removal of agressive islamo/faschists from all corners of the globe. They know we wont go without a good reason, but the dicks behind the paper always try to make money off of it.
Yeah, Kim Jong IL doesn't kill his own people (wink), and he's a dictator. Why not him? We have quite a few dictators who have committed atrocities to choose from-- How about Chavez? How about Pinochet, when he was in power? How about Pol Pot in Cambodia? Mercenaries fight for money (read: Blackwater), not for "freedom", or "democracy". Why not take on China? They jail Christians, and dissidents-- how about Saudi Arabia, they have oil, and are muslim. Why not? You have NO argument.
i have no argument ?? oh yeah lets all sit around and let the bad guys destroy the world your good with that as long as you can sip you latte at starbucks why didn't Kennedy and or Johnson pull out of vietnam . lets not forget your Camelot hero bay of pigs invasion .Kennedy WAR criminal
what an individual soldier believes is what keeps him fighting...the soldiers have a differnt agenda than any politician, and they are some of the smartest people living. i did some volunteer work at a Veterans affairs center and i talk to thousands all the time..they think we are right being over there, at least we were until saddam was killed then we should have devoted to afghanistan like we are now. You are a moron. dont think those soldiers died for nothing, they died for so much more. punk
Hey, the soldiers are the best-- I'm talking about the civilian leadership-- I am glad the soldiers are not demoralized, w/out them we would be up shit creek. I do think, privately, the soldiers are probably ambivalent at best-- You want to remove a dictator? Put a name in a hat-- Saddam was one of many-- but W ( a man who went AWOL, then had Daddy seal his records) chose Saddam-- twisting intelligence, and the Law to get what he wanted--King George indeed. W was/continues to be/ the problem.
johnbutlerjr national interest to remove a dictator NOT !!?
its the world interest to get rid of him saddam kill tally 2 mil+ started 2 wars gassed his own people VIOLATED every UN resolution he signed after the gulf war, iraq is now a democracy afganistan is also you got a problem with democracy .let not forget he tried to build a nuclear power plant HMMMM
OK, is the world footing the bill? For all the conservative arguments about why Saddam was removed, under it all, Neo-cons were betrayed by the man they armed to fight the Iranians-- and HW betrayed the hard right by "not finishing the job and push onto Bahgdad". Iran is trying to build a nuclear reactor, so, should we invade them? They killed many innocent protestors, Isn't it a Democracy's interest to help others trying to have legal election results? Pol Pot killed 2 million-- HMMM.
I would of love to see how President NoBama would have done in the 43rd president term, with his bullshit foreign diplomacy. Im Cuban, and you know what I FUCKING HATE CASTRO, but in a way Im glad CASTRO denied his ass for being a DUMB ASS COME PINGA!!!!!!!!!! That goes to show dont play in playgrounds youve never been in before my friend. Fucking shaking Chavezs hand and shit what the fuck dude! Stupid LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
Unbelievable!!!! He did let the U.N Inspectors In, I saw it on the news!! HOly crap. how dumb is bush and anyone that believes any word that comes out of his mouth!
its insane that this happened. bush and his cronies in no way represent the feelings of the vast majority of this country. however he was elected twice, mainly because of CENSORSHIP AND THE MANIPULATION OF FACTS thrown on the table for Americans by reporters of the national media who MUST be getting paid off to cover for the asses of the current administration. but its very clear many americans dont dig deep enough for the truth. they just listen to fox news.
America is full if STUPID people who couldn't even find their own country on a map! it's getting embarrassing, we have a DOLT in the White House! Most American's have NO IDEA what America stands for, what our constitution means and we can thank our Conservative Corporate Media Monopoly for it!
the bush / cheney cabal has SABOTAGED America they have committed TREASON and Crimes Against humanity! we need a war crimes tribunal to prosecute these MURDERS!
This is the worst President in History, even Nixon doesn't come to Bush's knee Height when we talk about lying and making up stories and when confronted with these lies, he has this dumb founded look on his face and lies more, Americas open your eyes, and shame on the military for taking illegal orders that go against the Constitution of the United States of America. The Patriot act is an illegal law and any American that thinks exchanging freedom for false security is OK has to be totally nuts.
now sir u are doing everything which is possible to bring out the truth! but how will u make soo many Americans who trust their government with out thinking or using their own brains ?
gr8 job! i hope there is world peace and we live and let live!
..America disgraced itself during the vietnam war, now similar events happened in Iraq. No resolution of the war, no reason to invade Iraq. all we see is body bags. Next stop..Pakistan? or maybe Iran? what is wrong with this Evil tyranny in america's leadership?
Bush wasn't granted access to the oil fields so he invaded. Now that China closed the deal on the oil reserves, dare the Americans to attack China. I double dare. Can't, now they are going to do the same to Iran.
justice should be served to any president who breaks the law doesn't matter if it is Bush, Obama, McCain etc if a president breaks the law it is the right of the American people to hold him accountable, now whether Bush will be held accountable during the remaining path of destruction called his presidency or not we still have the right to call him out and make him accountable for his crimes.
It is not that they did not let them in, when taking that out of context it is a lie, what is meant is that he let them in but did not allow them full access to facilities. Therefore a war happened.
Every war/conflict including and after WW2 America was involved was shady. America has a long history of International treaties & agreements violations. America has violated sovereign states without U.N permission. Yet, here we are attempting to try Bush for what American presidents have done for so long. He just kept the hypocracy alive. To convict Bush first u must convict the presidents who are alive today with crimes. Since NATO and the UN need American money and forces to stay alive,HA
Actually WWI and WWII were just profit reaps for international bankers. Lusitania was planned and FDR knew about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Oh how the bankers wanted war and they get what they want.
Don't worry folks, there won't be an attack on Iran. Bush may be a moron wrapped in an idiot, and he just may be THAT stupid, but the people around him are not. Iran is no Iraq, is twice the size and 10 times as powerful - attacking Iran would be political suicide for Uncle Sam.
Effectively they Pissed on the Graves of every Patriot ever died for our Freedoms, Wiped their Asses with Our US Constitution and handed it to God. Treason is punishable by death. How sad that WE THE PEOPLE ARE NOW FORCED TO CONSTRUCT CASKETS for our top level Government officials. THEY CAN NOT BE BURIED IN SAME CEMETERIES AS THE PATRIOTS THEY PISSED ON! I suggest we watch our highest levels of Government and all those chicken shits who participated swim last mile to Antarctica.
To hell with all people full of hate, no matter country our religion. WE are about to have a very serious confrontation with our "eneemies". I urge you to call your congressmen and senate money bitches and let them know that FISA and and thier Iran war are not the way to go, let htm understand that the blood will be on their hands, enuff is enuff!!!!
Everyone protects the jews. With only 12(?) million of them in the world, it would be impossible to control everyone by military force. But you CAN control what they think! Communism, masonry, christianity, zionism, it's all the same to them.
They invented it all with the idea of confusing everyone except themselves. We have robots on Mars, but many people still think the world was created in seven days and you'll go to hell if you disagree.
Hell, the inspectors was giving out daily counts of Saddam short range missiles being destroyed my the United Nation. Next thing I know he's on T.V telling the World that Saddam and his sons must leave Iraq in 48 hours. Shock and Awe remember!
Bush has an escape plan -- that huge ranch he bought in Paraguay. If it ever looks like he will have to pay for his crimes, Bush will run south and hide where the last surviving Nazis did.
Thats a misconception. The bigshot nazis went to work for the US and/or the USSR. The others spread out and split up by going to Uraguay, Paraguay, Brazil, Argentina, other continents. Argentina is such a cliche, largely because thats where THEY wanted us to look for them, and there was a large German immigrant pop there years prior to both World Wars. The Odessa Project was largely fabricated and full of inaccuracies, sort of like the Da Vinci Code in how it became a bestselling book.
Things are getting bad and it scares the hell out of me. I refuse to sit back and watch this happen any longer. My children and even myself will be the ones paying the consequences of what this man has caused the American people. A closed mind will never be able to accept the truth.. it's time for everyone to WAKE UP and pay attention to what is going on around us. Being ignorant has got to stop. Being informed must prevail.
anytime is a good time to bring these war monggers to trial our rights are being torn apart . freedom of speach will no longer be a right if bush cheney get there way. and just for fun did you know bush cheny obama are distant cousins obama even admitted this on national TV we dont live in a monarchy the last i heard
Folks,you need to support this impeachment.Bush initiated Senate Bill 1959, The Homegrown Terrorist Bill,which simply enacts many things,but the crux is the constitution is dead; you will not be able to speak ill of the govt,internet will be censored,you cant even think and talk about your ideas if it is perceived to threaten the govt.Please, Mostly Ingnorant America,for once read and research what is happening.The local news is not reporting the trouble brewing in this country,soon there will..
"A team of 17 United Nations weapons inspectors has arrived in Iraq, supported by a sweeping mandate to search sites that were off limits during seven years of inspections in the 1990s."
Inspectors were allowed in by Saddam, Bush meanwhile insists Saddam didn't let them in. THAT is the specific lie I point out.
Lol this jackass is talking 1990s. He wont tell you the the YEAR that his 17 UN inspectors arrived because he KNOWS he is talking about the first team that arrived and got kicked out of Iraq by Saddam like a year later. I think it was 1996 or 98. Bush gave Saddam a chance to let the Inspecors back in in 2002.The Iraq war started in 2003. Im pretty sure representativepress is really a memember of WCW a commuinist funded party. The like to distort stuff.
"On January 27, 2003, Hans Blix reported to the United Nations Security Council on January 27, 2003, that Iraq has been cooperating with the weapons inspectors on process but has failed to demonstrate active cooperation on matters of substance.
1441 required active, full and immediate compliance without conditions and restrictions. Which Iraq didn't
@Hperman09 "Inspectors were allowed in by Saddam?" Yes. 1441 is a UN resolution & the U.S. is a member state. Nowhere does 1441 say member states can take it upon themselves to decide what is compliance or how long to give the inspectors. 1441 stated that the Security Council shall "remain seized of the matter," NOT "member states do what ever you want." In fact, when 1441 was written, the words "all necessary means" were taken out to avoid a war trigger & "face serious consequences" put in.
@representativepress Where in the hell had the UN has the authority over the UN? You assert it but it's false, Again: the only part of the charter granting authority over member states is regarding the UNSC but the U.S. had a veto power there so it won't effect the U.S.s for it. Soverigns can do whatever they want unelss there is LAW prohibiting it. You make it sound like the UN had the authority over the member states that is party to a 1991 ceasefire WHICH IS NOT TRUE BY MEANS.
@representativepress The UN had no rule over the USA. You can assert it but it's false, the United States had a VETO power there so it does not effect us. So what you're saying that the UN had the rule over the member states that are party to a 1991 ceasefire agreement which is NOT TRUE BY ANY OTHER MEANS. Each member states party to a 1991 ceasefire had every right to determine for themselbes and the U.S. had a VETO POWER THERE. So it didn't affect them.
@Hperman09 Treaties are law, the US signed the UN Charter. You should read the U.S. Constitution, seems you got the idea in your head that we AREN'T supposed to be a nation of laws and that acting like gangsters and pirates is OK. The war violated international law. Also, why and the world are you working so hard to make excuses for a man who is lying through his teeth? Bush claimed repeatedly that Saddam didn't let the inspectors in, Bush is shitting on you & you feel compelled to make excuses!
@representativepress Yawn you never fully read what's UN 1441. The UN **NEVER** SAID that Iraq was fully complying with 1441 even after the invasion of Iraq. Even UN inspector David Kays said that Iraq was in material breach of UN 1441 after we invaded in 2003.
And cite the law its violated i dare you. The UN doesn't decided what's legal or illegal. We don't take order from the UN. A lot of nations that went to war without the UN. The UN had no authority over the USA and so does other nations.
Perhaps you read Bush's book where he misleads?: "Bush makes selective use of Blix's January report, citing elements that support the idea that Hussein was not cooperating and leaving out parts that indicate his government was. AND – Bush fails to mention 2 subsequent Blix pre-invasion reports in February and early March, weeks before U.S. bombs struck Baghdad! Those show Iraq cooperating with inspectors and the inspectors finding no significant evidence that Hussein was hiding WMD programs!"
@representativepress read UNSCR 1441 closely. The exact text is: "Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access to all officials and other persons whom UNMOVIC....".
As it shown in 1.27.03, Hans Blix said Iraq was not fully complying.
The UN inspectors said we're saying because Iraq kept them blocking from inspecting. On March 2003, Hans Blix advised the UNSC that while Iraq's cooperation was "active", it was not "unconditional" and not "immediate", this means that Iraq was in violation of UN 1441. Cooperation required to be full and immediate and as Hans blix shows in 1.27. and 3.7.2003, Iraq failed. what did the UN did in the 1990s? They never take action so we can't wait for the UN when it proves to fail it's olibagions.
@Hperman09 "Bush left out that Blix later said, "Iraq has on the whole cooperated rather well so far" with inspectors. "The most important point to make is that access has been provided to all sites we have wanted to inspect and with one exception it has been prompt.""
No the promise of 687 and 1441 was not because Iraq had WMDs but Iraq would fully comply with 1441.
As Blix said that on 1.27, 2003, and on 3. 7. 2003, that Iraq was not fully and immediately complying with 1441.
Cooperation--not disarmament of WMDs and verification--required to be fully and immediate without conditions and restriction, therefore the conclusion is inescapable, Iraq failed.
That means we cannot trust the inspections because it gives Iraq more time to hide their own WMDs.
UN inspectors and Hans Blix believed Iraq had WMDs, they just could not find them. That's why theyu said No evidence. Every intel from 150 different nations believed that Iraq had WMDs. You believed that the invasion of Iraq was about WMDs but wrong, it's about upholding 17 UN violations that Iraq made for a decade.
Also here's what Hans Blix said during the 2009-2011 Iraq inquiry in UK.
"I, like most people at the time, felt that Iraq retains weapons of mass destruction,".
@Hperman09 "Blix reported on Feb. 14, 2003, that he had conducted 400 inspections at more than 300 sites without advance notice and without Iraqi interference. Although many proscribed weapons and items had not been accounted for, so far his inspectors had "not found any such weapons, only a small number of empty chemical munitions, which should have been declared and destroyed.""
Like i said, cooperation of 1441 was required to be full,not disarm, and Iraq didn't as Blix said on both January and March 2003. Same arguments that was used in the 1990s, Iraq had somewhat get rid of their WMDs entirely then play games then booted out UN inspectors. Wikileaks found that WMDs, not nukes, were found in most Iraq's factualities leftover from 1980s-1990s so regardless whether they had threat to coalition force or not, it shows that Saddam still tried to hide their WMDs program.
@Hperman09 Blix did NOT think that as time went on and that any one with brains could see that all the intel was being debunked. THe quote you use Blix has said he thought back in September 2002,
RACHAEL BROWN: However Dr Blix says as time wore on he became increasingly scepticl about the American and British reliance on intelligence from Iraqi defectors. Two months before Iraq's invasion, his inspectors had visited 500 sites and found no weapons of mass destruction.
@representativepress once sanctions were uplifted. Top Iraqi sr offcials under Saddam were interviewed and all confirmed he had not forgotten about wmds.
UN inspectors did not have authority to "require" more time. They requested it, and giving it would have violated the "last chance" deadlines set by 1441. Iraq had over 12 years to achieve compliance, and got caught making all-new violations by booted out UN inspectors. Read it 1441 carefully, Iraq was in violation of 1441. That means we cannot trust as result of the inspections as they being used by Iraq to hide their own WMDs. The whole point of 1441 was full compliance and Iraq failed.
@representativepress If the war violated International law, then why didn't the UN passed a resolution condemning the 2003 war? The 1991 GW didn't end the war, the hostility of it was suspended when Iraq and the UNSC signed a ceasefire agreement. Iraq promise to abide by it's 687 and Iraq failed to live up to it.
And Saddam admit to the Iraqi court he misled the world into believing that he had WMD and admit violating a ceasefire prior to the 2003 invasion hiding their WMDs from UN inspectors
@representativepress Dude, you make some interesting points. The big picture is violation of multiple UN resolutions since 1990 which issue of wmds fall under. Regime change was a must. All sanctions, diplomacy had failed. When the threat of invasion is known, Saddam attempts to open up. He has been a survivor, a weasle, so long as he and his regimes survives, was his ultimate goal. He had it coming long before. ISG conclusion has made it clear that Saddam possessed all capabilities to rearm
Blix said was a form of opinion, He's wrong. He doesn't cite the law that is violated. i know the Constitution and the UN charter far better than you ever be. In 1991 during a GW ceasefire, UNSC promise as 687 said that it would take action against Iraq if they failed to fully comply. for 12 years, Iraq didn't and the UNSC didn't secure peace and security to the area, therefore the UN violated it's 687.
The U.S. had no time to wait for the UN where the UN failed to live up to it's obligation.
@Hperman09 "He doesn't cite the law that is violated." The UN Charter. What right did Bush have to attack Iraq? None. AND what he did increased the threat of terrorism, just as the CIA predicted, AND killed many many people and cost a lot too. He needs to stand trial for what he did. Nazis were hung for what he did.
@representativepress Because Iraq directly threatened our allies in the middle east and (unlike North Korea) had no superpower protecting it and(unlike Pakistan) had no strategic interests the government there. Noticed after 9/11, we go through the Intel name Curveball who said that Iraq had an active WMDs program and because of it, most of middle east wanted us to remove him.
And none of the 2003 invasion would have happened if Saddam fully comply with 1441 or just leave the country.
@Hperman09 Saddam offered to leave, Bush refused. Bush claimed Saddam wanted to leave BUT wanted to bring "information on how to make WMD" with him. Do you believe Bush?
@representativepress Saddam said he WOULD never leave Iraq ever. That's why there was a photo showing Saddam in the crowd when U.S. forces entered Baghdad in April of 2003. I was never convinced about Colin Powell and Bush and every Intel from 150 nations that Saddam had active WMDs program but it does not matter whether he had them or not, Saddam had to let the UN inspectors in as part of 1441 and he didn't which we could assume he had WMDs or not but that alone wasn't the reason to invade.
@representativepress...it's a fact because his past acts, and our assumption that Saddam had active WMDs program therefore, Iraq was a threat to the region(as 687 and 1441 said so).
And Kofi Annan and others said it was illegal, They were wrongly incorrect about the proper section of the UN charter. Besides Congress gave President Bush an authorizing the use of military force against Saddam so what's illegal? After all we don't take orders from the UN anyways since we are sovereign nation.
@Hperman09 Congress authorized a CONDITIONAL authorization "enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq." "enforce" DOESN'T mean "violate" which is what Bush did. Resolution 1441 stated that the Security Council shall "remain seized of the matter." Bush undermined the inspection process which was being conducted. The Security Council's position was to continue the inspections.
Understand that IRAQ FAILED TO FULLY COMPLY. That's the whole point of 1441. There is no way to continue the inspections because they could have been use time to time for Iraq to hide their own WMDs and play games with UN inspectors. We know this motive since the 1990s Saying that UN inspectors needed more time you have not properly understand the whole point of UN 1441. The "seized matter" automatically granted to the UN power but it doesn't apply to individual member states.
@representativepress Realize at that time, the U.S. wrote the language you constrains from member states from acting, and yet that the U.S. was not constrained by the lack of UN action AND NO ONE AT THAT TIME said the language can restrain. They might have said the Charter restrains them but not with 1441 does. This is made up theory by a few law experts that hold no water. The U.S. had a VETO power so it doesn't imply to them. You make it sound like the UN had the authority over the USA.
@representativepress Pffft, the UN can suck a dick. The UN promise Iraq that it would take action against Iraq if they fail to comply with 687. The UN does not and violated it's 687. For 12 years they did not do anything at all. That's 100% fault of the UN. That's why there is a debate regarding UN powers.
The UN failed to live up to it's promise, then it reduces UN power which is a good thing. It should never taken action in 1991, only giving nations to speak with each other.
@Hperman09 That's right man. Not only failed to comply with UN resols. But also Iraq was a signitary of the 1972 Biological, toxin convention, banning all it's biochem program. It failed to live up to this and continued it's wmd program. In late 2002, Iraq began to show relaxation on it's inspection only after US was mounting it's military in Kuwait in summer. Saddam was frantic. Even then Blix made it clear that Iraq was still not in compliance, inconsistent, , incomplete in it's 12,000 page
@HDNighster1 Yep, Saddam violated a ceasefire terms agreed upon suspending the hostilities of the 1990-1991 Gulf War. The U.S./UK and Iraq were in a constant state of war since 1990 and since Iraq was in violation of those terms, the U.S./UK, party to the 1990-1991 conflict, had every right to resume hostilities under UNSCR 678 and 687, and therefore justified action. I'm not saying that Bush action in 2003 was necessary but because of it, it was a right thing to go out and kick Saddam's ass.
@Hperman09 Agree man. After resol 687, Iraq set up concealment committees, ie., CP3, headed by SSO, Kamil who later defected, to end of 1998. Multiple violations of No fly zone in north and in south. US and allies flew over 100,000 sorties to police these areas with Saddam still continue to fire antiaircraft. His military reach 80% of what it was prior to Guf War.All this was financed through selling of oil in black market, via Jordan, Turkey, oil for food scam.
@HDNighster1 Agreed, Saddam's forces kept on attacking U.S. and UK aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones almost daily in many years up until 2002 and this placed Saddam in violation of a 1991 ceasefire agreement. Also UNSCR 687 explicitly said: "Affirming the commitment of all Member States.......to bring their military presence in Iraq". This explicitly said the any member states has right to bring their military presence to Iraq if any case they failed to comply with UNSC Resolutions.
@Hperman09 Saddam didn't give a fuck about his own people's welfare. As long as he and his regime survived. Over the long run, Iraq is a hell of alot better without him. He was hanged for crimes against humanity. well deserved.
@HDNighster1 Of course Saddam doesn't give a shit about his own people and we were righfully take him out of power. That's why Saddam divert his oil-for-funds to build his own military and his own places instead of the Iraqi people who were suffering under sanctions.
What i'm saying that after Saddam was removed, insurgency was arise costing thounsands of U.S. lives . Saddam actually kept his country in control. You're right the world is better without him.
@Hperman09 That' right man. But Saddam kept it under control with brute force. Insurgency is not a surprise. Sunni, Shite uprising since tension has been mounting since 650 AD. It is like a rubberband effect. You can pull with increasing tension. But will recoil. 1st time since 650 AD, Shite, Kurdish majority in Mesopotamia are in power and not supressed.
@HDNighster1 Of course they are no doubt that Saddam kept control of the country off the buffer of Iran. I wonder if Bush Jr know this or not? was he very aware of that invading Iraq and removing Saddam Hussein from power created civil war?
@Hperman09 Good thought man. Yes. So did the rest of adm. This was forseen long time ago. The problems of ethnic tension, tribal loyalties, security issues, # of soldiers neede"several hundred thousand", Eric Shinseki based on his expeirence and reports he recieved. Gen Zinni, prior to Franks, former Central Command did a 6 month study of hypothetical take over of Iraq and the issues that would come out of it. His prediction was correct as other military commanders, ie., Clark.
@HDNighster1 Then IMO, Bush was an idiot for not awaring that. i admit he had balls to go out without the UN because dickhead UN failed to force Iraq compliance for 12 years. But i also find Bush at fault for not carrying out a post-invasion plan. Now we had spend billions trying to protect Iraq from being taken over by Iran. The 4,000 casualties of American and 104,000 Iraqi lives would have been saved if Bush admin would have plan this for the better.
@Hperman09 That's tight man. It wasn't his fault. Plan to invade has been going on long before Bush came into office due to Saddam's record. occupation plan wasn't thought about until the last 2 yrs. Officials that continually informed of the issues that will arise after occupation were ignored. OHRA headed by LTG Gardner had 2 months to plan. He had excellent ideas set out. But was replaced by Paul Bremer 2 months after occupation who did 2 major mistakes. Gen order #1 and 2, Debaath,demilitary
@Hperman09 I don't think Iran will be an issue. They have seen what we have gone through. But will have some influence. Iran is not a big threat or an issue as media projects. For them, Israel and US are not a concern. But Pakistan is, a Sunni nation with 100 nuclear bombs, most extreme radicals, and weak government. This US concern as well.
@HDNighster1 Dude, Iran backed Shiite militias to carry out attacks on Coalition troops and Iraqi civilians, so it seemly like they wanted to take over Iraq, not to mention that Al-Qaeda is still present in Iraq and Iran even backed them as well. Further, Iran said they will wipe off Israel off the map with nukes. So yes Iran wanted to wipe off Israel off the maps and turn Iraq into a 3rd world shithole.
Cheney said in 1994, that invading Iraq would result a quagmire and "no exit" strategy.
@HDNighster1 Dude, Iran backed Shiite militias to carry out attacks on Coalition troops and Iraqi civilians, so it seemly like they wanted to take over Iraq, not to mention that Al-Qaeda is still present in Iraq and Iran even backed them as well. Further, Iran said they will wipe off Israel off the map with nukes. So yes Iran wanted to wipe off Israel off the maps and turn Iraq into a 3rd world shithole.
Cheney said in 1994, that invading Iraq would result a quagmire and "no exit" strategy.
@Hperman09 We've been at proxy war with Iran since 1979, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq. But not to take over Iraq. we did them by eliminating their most fierce enemy, Saddam. Wiping off Israel off the map is a phrase that was misinterpretated. The propaganda worked in Israel's favor by harboring greater sanctions from UN against Iran.
Much intel of Talibs in 2001 came from Iran and assisted us. In fact, Iranian officials and Amid Khalizi, US rep to UN and Iraq had a meeting in Europe after invasion.
@Hperman09 Iran was petrified. Iran offered talks of peace and forgeting past events, recognizing Israeli-Palestinan issue for treaty, and help us fight Al Qaeda, full UN/IAEA unconditional inspection of their nuclear program without concessions. . In return, we give them diplomatic relations, help them fight terrorist in their nation, ease tension between us and them. We said no.
@HDNighster1 I can't understand the way you write. Iran help us fight Al-Qaeda? Iran doesn't do for shit. Iran gave support for the Hamas and Hezbollah Al-Hejaz to carry out attacks on citizens in Israel and pretty much American interests in the middle east.
It doesn't matter. Just because Iran helped us doesn't mean they are innocent. Iran and Pakistan also gave support for the Taliban as they are a secular Islamic nation that hated the USA.
@publicmario17 That's right man, Iran will. Afghanistan is right in their border. Thye've kept a very close eye on A Qaeda. Info for us to get Talibs in 2001,much came from Iran. Like I said before, we've been at proxy war with Iran since 1979, we supported Iraq against Iran. Iran has fought us through other nations. When they see the most powerful nation at their doorstep, they will look for concessions. Infact, joint Israel-Iranian attack on Osirak. Iran failed, so Israel finished it in 1981.
@publicmario17 As you know, we are not that innocent as well. We supported mujahaddens, AL qaeda during Soviet Afghan war and left Afghanistan to dry politically; thus we are suffering for creating this vacancy. Iranians and Talibs do not get along.But enemies. Talibs are Sunnis, who despise Shites. They assassinated Iranian Ambassador in Mazariff Shariff. When Talibs took over Herat, Iran mobilized their Army towards border to prevent their spread, as did Russia and Central Republics.
@publicmario17 Haha really? Just to tell you Israel has killed WAY more civilians in Lebanon, and if Iran didn't support Hezbollah, all of the Southern of Lebanon would be Israel today, and most of Lebanon's oil is on the borders, so thanks to Iran, the Lebanese people can live in peace knowing Hezbollah will protect with the aid of Iran, but tell me, why did Israel retreat from the borders of Lebanon? because Hezbollah bombed them, just like they did to Lebanon..
@Hperman09 "The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter." and as I pointed out, nearly every international law expert agrees it was an illegal war.
@representativepress Fact, the U.S. initiated no war, Bush did start by invading in 2003 but not the war itself. Saddam started it by invading Kuwait in 1990. The U.S. beat Iraq in 1991 and after it, Iraq agreed to 687 to fully disarm their WMDs and fully comply with UN inspectors. Iraq didn't and the U.S. resume hostilities in 2003.
So in legal fact, the U.S. didn't start the 2003 war. It's only one Gulf War. You still have not name one part that the war was in violation of International law.
@representativepress France, Germany, China and all other member of the UN even said, "Iraq's non-compliance of 1441 posed an International threat to security and peace to the region" and it did NOT say one word about full disarmament or verification. Compliance needs to be full and as Blix shows in January and March 2003, Iraq failed.
And i don't get this from Bush, i don't like this guy either but to say i get it from Bush is totally ignorant and stupid. I know where i'm getting at.
@representativepress Yes i watch the video, Your video was mostly wrong. What did i say below? Saddam did allowed UN inspectors in then play games and starting hid things from them as Blix on January and March 2003 show on Iraq was failing to fully and immediately complying.
WW III is the only thing about truth. No God proved Himself without blood traditionally. Some how I heard my church preach that. Sin is the reason that God has fun... oops has meaning. Sorry pastor sir, I am not apologetic enough but I am evangelical.
Look,why bother to comment when it's obvious you dont follow foreign affairs.The inspectors were allowed in for weeks,this was after Saddam ignored them during the gulf war fiasco,he was embarrassed and was posturing until he realized that the world was on our side and would allow sanctions & action vs Iraq,so he then smartly allowed them in.Surprisingly,it's was reported all over the news and internet.All you have to do is google it,it isnt difficult to find.
bush is not fit to be city dog catcher much less president ,not only impeachment needs to be done but bush,cheney,rice,all these need to be tried for there part in these crimes
The NEWS is owned by this but fucker and his pals, DO NOT BELEIVE NEWS! NEWS IS THE ENEMY ALSO, THESTATIONS ARE OWNED BY THEM!
All Televsision is BAD for the HUMAN mind, TV is a RADIO BRAODCASTING DEVICE, SO IS YOUR BRAIN, TV IS NEGATIVE WAVEFORMS PROVEN TO HURT THE MIND< CAUSE DISEASE AND ALSO HYPONOTISE PEOPLE, THIS IS FACTS...
TV is the DEVIL you all want to avoid.
REPITITION = MIND CONTROL, what DOES TV REPEATE CONSTANTLY?, DISEASE COMMERCIALS, WHATS NEXT? WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE.
Take a break and meditate, no need to hate and be irate, it's just another ploy of the fear machine to make you lose your cool so they can rule with ease though everyone sees the lie. See beyond the trees and it becomes clear there's scarcely a forest there at all. Take the power you surrender to their manipulations out of the loop. There's a stronger way to be. Much love to ya. Peace.
Learn quantum physics people, its something they all know and use against us, TV itself is HYPNOSIS its a proven fact, TV is running the world and everyone beleives it like facts, DONT PARTICIPATE WITH ECONOMY AND ECNOMY WILL CRASH, DONT BUY GAS AND THE PRICE WILL FALL, THERE WILL BE NOWHERE TO STORE THE FUEL< COSTING THEM STORAGE FEES, ALL WE NEED DO IS STOP SUPPORTING THE FUCKS BY BUYING THIER SCAMS, EVERYONE TAKE A WEEK OFF BUYING GAS AND THEY WILL FALL OFF THE CHARTS LIKE DEAD FLIES.
Congress, do your job! "To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men."(A.Lincoln)This administration has justified the use of torture & depleted uranium.They've destroyed the lives of millions of families.These men are war criminals;they're murderers,liars & theives who have looted the country's treasury,& they really think they're going to get away with it & run off to Dubai & elsewhere abroad. THEY MUST BE IMPEACHED!JOIN A TRUTH MOVEMENT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD;START YOUR OWN!
The U.S.A. is the great SATAN!
mrsirks 2 days ago
Thou shalt not bear false witness. The USA has such a hard time with this concept.
mrsirks 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you really need proof,(do an experiment) ...put your headphone(choose one earphone, only one), plug into your ear, make special attention to the volume(do not let others hear what is coming from chosen earphone), while one earphone is inside, try to make conversation with others, but speak only words, spoken to you by your friend through selected earphone. DO the observation. Then, watch all ( if you can) media, where George W Bush speaks to the journalists.....Have fun.But do not freak out.
sseneno444 2 days ago
DUDE I WAS LIKE 6 AND AS AN ARAB I SAW TRUCKS WITH MISSILES ON THEM I ASKED MY MOM WHAT THAT WAS SHE TOLD ME SADDAM HAS TO DESTROY HIS WEAPONS BECAUSE AMERICA SAID SO ... SO I ASKED THE MAGICAL QUESTION ... WHY? ... and now im here <3 subbed!
abdullazeidan 1 month ago in playlist Not Just Israel, Iraq War Lies BIG too! playlist
Anyone else noticed Dennis reptilian eyes on this video?????
LoveThalia4311 3 months ago in playlist Not Just Israel, Iraq War Lies BIG too! playlist
This has been flagged as spam show
BUSH LIED
IT WAS AN ISIDE JOB
BUSH IS A BIG SHIT
BUSH LIED
AND THAT'S ALL FOLKS!!!
manolino1969 3 months ago
Most Europeans know America is fucked and corrupt.
We are all wondering how long it takes before u guys find out and do something about it.
Our governments are lying about stuff too but (i hope) nothing as big as this.
but my country never starts wars.
alexicon89 3 months ago in playlist Not Just Israel, Iraq War Lies BIG too! playlist
Bush lied on everything..le monde est devenu une jungle, la raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure!
Juincoupedumonde 3 months ago
Why hasn't this man and Tony Blair been arrested and tried for lying to their public and taking advantage of the military to line their own pockets? There is a lot of blood on their hands and it sickens me to think they will live out their old age very rich and comfortable while children grow up without their fathers because Bush and Blair sent them to die in vain.
jarvis911 4 months ago
I thought this was a new video, and you came to your senses that 9/11 was a inside job.
bloodwiper 4 months ago
@Gradivus375 Inspectors Call U.S. Tips 'Garbage'
"U.N. arms inspectors are privately complaining about the quality of U.S. intelligence and accusing the United States of sending them on wild-goose chases. ... The inspectors have become so frustrated trying to chase down unspecific or ambiguous U.S. leads that they've begun to express that anger privately in no uncertain terms. U.N. sources have told CBS News that American tips have lead to one dead end after another." SEE LINK IN VIDEO INFO
representativepress 4 months ago
@representativepress did you get my message?
publicmario17 4 months ago
@Gradivus375 Inspectors Call U.S. Tips 'Garbage'
"U.N. arms inspectors are privately complaining about the quality of U.S. intelligence and accusing the United States of sending them on wild-goose chases. ... The inspectors have become so frustrated trying to chase down unspecific or ambiguous U.S. leads that they've begun to express that anger privately in no uncertain terms. U.N. sources have told CBS News that American tips have lead to one dead end after another." SEE LINK IN VIDEO INFO
representativepress 4 months ago
@Gradivus375 "By the time President Bush ordered U.S. troops to disarm Saddam Hussein of the deadly weapons he was allegedly trying to build, every piece of fresh evidence had been tested -- and disproved -- by U.N. inspectors, according to a report commissioned by the president" Panel: U.S. Ignored Work of U.N. Arms Inspectors By Dafna Linzer Washington Post Staff Writer (see link in the video info)
representativepress 4 months ago
@Gradivus375 Stop desperately trying to make excuses for this man. There is no place in Iraq that Saddam "didn't let the inspectors in" (into) So either way, it is a lie. What Bush is saying is a lie.
representativepress 4 months ago
murdering usa &isreal just leave Iran the fuck alone ! they are in their own country minding their own business ! the only ones causing shit is isreal murdering Palestinians and usa murdering anyone who has oil or anything they want. bush out obama in = and now its a racist black guy incharge thats guna start ww3 either in iran or in the usa itself ! and for the record the inspectors were there & didnt find shit it was on the fucking news, strange shithead bush says they werent there
thrallskull 1 year ago
The worst president in history. No doubt.
CoolasIce2 1 year ago
FUCK OBAMA!
phantom1000A 1 year ago
Drealist87 2 years ago
Bush is not real threat. He is just puppet. The real threat is the NEO CONS!!
Kite208 2 years ago 15
@Kite208 Nato?
Pikazilla 3 months ago
And now we have a bigger liar than Bush. Who would have thought that was possible?
RCinPAWA 2 years ago 4
Impeach bush? And make who has president? Cheyney. thats not better at all!
darkvampire5555 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
representaive press represents the looney left anti semetic scum who try desperatly to harm americas support for israel. just read the comments on this channel to see the truth about this leftwing anti semite!!!!!
imanglo 2 years ago
arabs are Semitic too :| check your history.
7areegaa 2 years ago 9
I Guess Congress Didn't Listen...
Obama Is The Same Bullshit.
Obama Is About 2 Declare War With Iran.
InfamousJMB 2 years ago 5
lol we'll see
Cfrogboy91 2 years ago
@InfamousJMB no i dont think so i think obama is to much of a puss to do that
pissingpeopleoff109 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
johnbutlerjr
china ? china is our industrial bitch ., how you like your cheap IPOD , if i was made here the cost would be tipple
Kim Jong IL hes south Koreas problem
hugo chevy subverting democracy with democracy
i hear no DEMS bitching about him
saudi arabia ? mercenaries ?your swinging wild here .
oh i forgot everything wrong in the world is GW's fault
why760nitro 2 years ago
spam...
RevLuvBlackKlan 2 years ago
Bush exceeded his authority and lied to Congress using the most flimsy piece of intelligence that he could scrape up. HIs advisors knew that the evidence he used was bogus.
No Democrat stood up and called him a liar while he spoke to Congress.
People in this country are divided into factions and don't hold their elected officials accountable. Instead they argue on blogs and you tube and get nothing done.
Momsincharge 2 years ago 5
@Momsincharge THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!! FOR THE TRUTH!
Peaceinlifenowar 2 years ago
We The People
DarkMonkArt 2 years ago
LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION...
Destroy the bankers and socially misfit bureaucrats and once again uphold a nation of producers living off the land in peace...
gasoline created our freakishly large world population and surely it will destroy it. Except to the few odd people who learn to live off the land in the city or in the country!!!
poonfestian 2 years ago
Bush made the right move look art all the oil our marines are marching above VICTORY!
jewspookeyr 2 years ago
We invaded Iraq bc Saddam tried to kill daddy Bush back in '93, after the Gulf War! It was a personal vendetta on Bush's part, also known as "Texas Justice", and he believed that in order avenge his family name and his father he had to do it, to go after Saddam and he used the United States military to pull it off and the US economy to fund it!
He put his own interests ahead of the countries interests and the very security of the United States!! He should have been impeached a long time ago...
SpookeyR 2 years ago
SpookeyR rasist maggot you should have been an abortion save the state money raising a reeeeeetarded fuckwit liberal OWNED again
movie fan?? watch 12 monkeys starring Bruce Willis and brad pitt , its about how Bruce has to go back and forth thru time to find a cure for a virus that decimates the human race, a virus released by a bunny hugs liberal in order to save planet earth .sums up the left mentality perfectly
why760nitro 2 years ago
Ad hominem attacks are fun!! Just look at this Double Whammy-smacked jackass!!!
SpookeyR 2 years ago
iraq war ??? libber blah blah saddam started 2 wars
gassed his own people violated every UN agreement his kill tally is 2 million + and the world should have left him alone
poor poor liberal reasoning
get over the GW era quit crying in 2 years people will hate obama it will all be their fault ,cant blame the CONS even though PELOSI keeps trying
why760nitro 2 years ago
Well, with nothing but ad hominem attacks to support your fear mongering bullshit, how was I to expect anything more!?
SpookeyR 2 years ago
when pigs fly or libbers grow a brain
i am betting on the pig
BAL BLAH saddam started 2 wars , his dictatorship led to the death of 2 million + and we should;d have left him alone to start another war
why760nitro 2 years ago
He should have been removed diplomatically! And that could have happened and if you want to blame Bill Clinton for that then fine but, fear mongering about liberals, especially coming from A BARELY LITERATE politically ignorant jackass such as yourself, doesn't do anything but prove that you are wrong!!
SpookeyR 2 years ago
So, it's in the national interest to remove a dictator? NOT the reason W gave, tho, is it? You have any Kurdish friends? Doubt it. You have any muslim friends? Doubt it. You have any friends?... W did a bait and switch. 4000 + US military deaths. Go talk to a vet, and see how they feel about this kind of crap.
johnbutlerjr 2 years ago
bait and swits in your opinion go pick up a soldier of fortune issue see what the troops say go ask an iraq if the likes to vote now
4000 yeah lets keep a dictator in power just for that reason he would have kept killing his own people FOREVER
why760nitro 2 years ago
...or as long as he and his ilk were in charge. And that is in our National interest how? Because Iraq is a great vacation spot? Because we buy all our consumer goods from them? Because we borrow money from them? ... Oh, yeah, it's about OIL. Again. But this time, w/ a piddly "Coalition of the Willing", and the US footing the enormous bill, we went ahead.. to make sure Iraqis can vote? I thought it was WMD, the "mushroom cloud".. bait and switch means, we go in for WMD, then say "Freedom
johnbutlerjr 2 years ago
i still thing it was just in cause, but i do believe after removal and successful election, we should have GTFO, but thats not to say other people in congress didnt have plans to get their hands on oil..but we citizens, citizen/soldiers, and soldiers all believe in the same cause, and thats removal of agressive islamo/faschists from all corners of the globe. They know we wont go without a good reason, but the dicks behind the paper always try to make money off of it.
fireball676 2 years ago
Yeah, Kim Jong IL doesn't kill his own people (wink), and he's a dictator. Why not him? We have quite a few dictators who have committed atrocities to choose from-- How about Chavez? How about Pinochet, when he was in power? How about Pol Pot in Cambodia? Mercenaries fight for money (read: Blackwater), not for "freedom", or "democracy". Why not take on China? They jail Christians, and dissidents-- how about Saudi Arabia, they have oil, and are muslim. Why not? You have NO argument.
johnbutlerjr 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have no argument ?? oh yeah lets all sit around and let the bad guys destroy the world your good with that as long as you can sip you latte at starbucks why didn't Kennedy and or Johnson pull out of vietnam . lets not forget your Camelot hero bay of pigs invasion .Kennedy WAR criminal
why760nitro 2 years ago
what an individual soldier believes is what keeps him fighting...the soldiers have a differnt agenda than any politician, and they are some of the smartest people living. i did some volunteer work at a Veterans affairs center and i talk to thousands all the time..they think we are right being over there, at least we were until saddam was killed then we should have devoted to afghanistan like we are now. You are a moron. dont think those soldiers died for nothing, they died for so much more. punk
fireball676 2 years ago
Hey, the soldiers are the best-- I'm talking about the civilian leadership-- I am glad the soldiers are not demoralized, w/out them we would be up shit creek. I do think, privately, the soldiers are probably ambivalent at best-- You want to remove a dictator? Put a name in a hat-- Saddam was one of many-- but W ( a man who went AWOL, then had Daddy seal his records) chose Saddam-- twisting intelligence, and the Law to get what he wanted--King George indeed. W was/continues to be/ the problem.
johnbutlerjr 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
johnbutlerjr national interest to remove a dictator NOT !!?
its the world interest to get rid of him saddam kill tally 2 mil+ started 2 wars gassed his own people VIOLATED every UN resolution he signed after the gulf war, iraq is now a democracy afganistan is also you got a problem with democracy .let not forget he tried to build a nuclear power plant HMMMM
he was a weapon of mass destruction
why760nitro 2 years ago
OK, is the world footing the bill? For all the conservative arguments about why Saddam was removed, under it all, Neo-cons were betrayed by the man they armed to fight the Iranians-- and HW betrayed the hard right by "not finishing the job and push onto Bahgdad". Iran is trying to build a nuclear reactor, so, should we invade them? They killed many innocent protestors, Isn't it a Democracy's interest to help others trying to have legal election results? Pol Pot killed 2 million-- HMMM.
johnbutlerjr 2 years ago
I would of love to see how President NoBama would have done in the 43rd president term, with his bullshit foreign diplomacy. Im Cuban, and you know what I FUCKING HATE CASTRO, but in a way Im glad CASTRO denied his ass for being a DUMB ASS COME PINGA!!!!!!!!!! That goes to show dont play in playgrounds youve never been in before my friend. Fucking shaking Chavezs hand and shit what the fuck dude! Stupid LIBERAL DEMOCRATS
Jcerna88 2 years ago
keep up the good fight brother.
bonedaddyo 2 years ago
Way to fear monger, PIG!!
SpookeyR 2 years ago
Comment removed
why760nitro 2 years ago
Let demonstrate in front of CNN, FOX News and other lie machines.
tamingsariyt 3 years ago 2
How's about; In front of the Mayor's (gives the Police ORDERS) locations, Police Station's, across the Street's from Schools, Malls, Churches.
tfbbm 3 years ago
prosecute!!
noe1here 3 years ago 2
Unbelievable!!!! He did let the U.N Inspectors In, I saw it on the news!! HOly crap. how dumb is bush and anyone that believes any word that comes out of his mouth!
mraperish 3 years ago 4
its insane that this happened. bush and his cronies in no way represent the feelings of the vast majority of this country. however he was elected twice, mainly because of CENSORSHIP AND THE MANIPULATION OF FACTS thrown on the table for Americans by reporters of the national media who MUST be getting paid off to cover for the asses of the current administration. but its very clear many americans dont dig deep enough for the truth. they just listen to fox news.
kjlig 3 years ago 3
America is full if STUPID people who couldn't even find their own country on a map! it's getting embarrassing, we have a DOLT in the White House! Most American's have NO IDEA what America stands for, what our constitution means and we can thank our Conservative Corporate Media Monopoly for it!
the bush / cheney cabal has SABOTAGED America they have committed TREASON and Crimes Against humanity! we need a war crimes tribunal to prosecute these MURDERS!
shroomduke 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
i need someone smart to keep me entertained
SOMEONE TALK TO ME Pk
98563256 3 years ago
This is the worst President in History, even Nixon doesn't come to Bush's knee Height when we talk about lying and making up stories and when confronted with these lies, he has this dumb founded look on his face and lies more, Americas open your eyes, and shame on the military for taking illegal orders that go against the Constitution of the United States of America. The Patriot act is an illegal law and any American that thinks exchanging freedom for false security is OK has to be totally nuts.
bilderberghunter 3 years ago 3
now sir u are doing everything which is possible to bring out the truth! but how will u make soo many Americans who trust their government with out thinking or using their own brains ?
gr8 job! i hope there is world peace and we live and let live!
kallikusta 3 years ago
F*** bush an his diabolical f***ed up family
labor13 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
this is the stupidest thing ever
Rightway111 3 years ago
..America disgraced itself during the vietnam war, now similar events happened in Iraq. No resolution of the war, no reason to invade Iraq. all we see is body bags. Next stop..Pakistan? or maybe Iran? what is wrong with this Evil tyranny in america's leadership?
mickyster 3 years ago
Bush wasn't granted access to the oil fields so he invaded. Now that China closed the deal on the oil reserves, dare the Americans to attack China. I double dare. Can't, now they are going to do the same to Iran.
ytkingster 3 years ago
justice should be served to any president who breaks the law doesn't matter if it is Bush, Obama, McCain etc if a president breaks the law it is the right of the American people to hold him accountable, now whether Bush will be held accountable during the remaining path of destruction called his presidency or not we still have the right to call him out and make him accountable for his crimes.
iamjesusofsuburbia 3 years ago 2
It is not that they did not let them in, when taking that out of context it is a lie, what is meant is that he let them in but did not allow them full access to facilities. Therefore a war happened.
FFDmh2223 3 years ago
you can't handle the truth
messianicprophecies 3 years ago
Every war/conflict including and after WW2 America was involved was shady. America has a long history of International treaties & agreements violations. America has violated sovereign states without U.N permission. Yet, here we are attempting to try Bush for what American presidents have done for so long. He just kept the hypocracy alive. To convict Bush first u must convict the presidents who are alive today with crimes. Since NATO and the UN need American money and forces to stay alive,HA
Yahshua4eva 3 years ago
Actually WWI and WWII were just profit reaps for international bankers. Lusitania was planned and FDR knew about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Oh how the bankers wanted war and they get what they want.
Tianshou88 3 years ago
Congress is a whore house! Its almost midnight folks, Patriots!
allenmart 3 years ago 2
your going to have to impeach Pelosi the Iraqi war gate keeper first.
allenmart 3 years ago
useless time wasted . bush sneak a bill though that protect him from war crimes while he was in office
SleePeRzAwAkEn 3 years ago
Don't worry folks, there won't be an attack on Iran. Bush may be a moron wrapped in an idiot, and he just may be THAT stupid, but the people around him are not. Iran is no Iraq, is twice the size and 10 times as powerful - attacking Iran would be political suicide for Uncle Sam.
ummelaila 3 years ago
fuck bush he's a cock lying sucka!!!!
Thet3 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Effectively they Pissed on the Graves of every Patriot ever died for our Freedoms, Wiped their Asses with Our US Constitution and handed it to God. Treason is punishable by death. How sad that WE THE PEOPLE ARE NOW FORCED TO CONSTRUCT CASKETS for our top level Government officials. THEY CAN NOT BE BURIED IN SAME CEMETERIES AS THE PATRIOTS THEY PISSED ON! I suggest we watch our highest levels of Government and all those chicken shits who participated swim last mile to Antarctica.
thorsbond 3 years ago 2
To hell with all people full of hate, no matter country our religion. WE are about to have a very serious confrontation with our "eneemies". I urge you to call your congressmen and senate money bitches and let them know that FISA and and thier Iran war are not the way to go, let htm understand that the blood will be on their hands, enuff is enuff!!!!
ALoha
LucidVizione 3 years ago 5
Everyone protects the jews. With only 12(?) million of them in the world, it would be impossible to control everyone by military force. But you CAN control what they think! Communism, masonry, christianity, zionism, it's all the same to them.
They invented it all with the idea of confusing everyone except themselves. We have robots on Mars, but many people still think the world was created in seven days and you'll go to hell if you disagree.
I think it's the opposite.
WEREFEAT 3 years ago
Hell, the inspectors was giving out daily counts of Saddam short range missiles being destroyed my the United Nation. Next thing I know he's on T.V telling the World that Saddam and his sons must leave Iraq in 48 hours. Shock and Awe remember!
crowcue 3 years ago
Bush has an escape plan -- that huge ranch he bought in Paraguay. If it ever looks like he will have to pay for his crimes, Bush will run south and hide where the last surviving Nazis did.
TranDan08 3 years ago 5
I'll hunt that fucker down!
zdon25 3 years ago
Most of the Nazi's went to Argentina actually, lol.
corylatimer 3 years ago 4
Thats a misconception. The bigshot nazis went to work for the US and/or the USSR. The others spread out and split up by going to Uraguay, Paraguay, Brazil, Argentina, other continents. Argentina is such a cliche, largely because thats where THEY wanted us to look for them, and there was a large German immigrant pop there years prior to both World Wars. The Odessa Project was largely fabricated and full of inaccuracies, sort of like the Da Vinci Code in how it became a bestselling book.
evrithnguneed 3 years ago
Oh wow I didn't know that. What is 'The Odessa Project' you speak of?
corylatimer 3 years ago
Things are getting bad and it scares the hell out of me. I refuse to sit back and watch this happen any longer. My children and even myself will be the ones paying the consequences of what this man has caused the American people. A closed mind will never be able to accept the truth.. it's time for everyone to WAKE UP and pay attention to what is going on around us. Being ignorant has got to stop. Being informed must prevail.
saraevwilli 3 years ago 2
Fuck. If Bush and the media actually succeed in fueling a war with Iran, I will seriously leave this country.
VampireSaviorX 3 years ago 4
anytime is a good time to bring these war monggers to trial our rights are being torn apart . freedom of speach will no longer be a right if bush cheney get there way. and just for fun did you know bush cheny obama are distant cousins obama even admitted this on national TV we dont live in a monarchy the last i heard
surfjerr 3 years ago
They pick a perfect time!!! To late America!! Should have been trying to do this the first time he LIED!!
Xanith83 3 years ago 2
Folks,you need to support this impeachment.Bush initiated Senate Bill 1959, The Homegrown Terrorist Bill,which simply enacts many things,but the crux is the constitution is dead; you will not be able to speak ill of the govt,internet will be censored,you cant even think and talk about your ideas if it is perceived to threaten the govt.Please, Mostly Ingnorant America,for once read and research what is happening.The local news is not reporting the trouble brewing in this country,soon there will..
Tekkhan 3 years ago
You know what proving him unfit for duty would be a good angle, for congress to use to get rid of him.
hurchel 3 years ago
you say that bush lied yet you bring up no proof/backup on why you believe so. If anyone has any please show me politely, not in a rude manner.
Maserati7200 3 years ago
I put the links in the video description:
"A team of 17 United Nations weapons inspectors has arrived in Iraq, supported by a sweeping mandate to search sites that were off limits during seven years of inspections in the 1990s."
Inspectors were allowed in by Saddam, Bush meanwhile insists Saddam didn't let them in. THAT is the specific lie I point out.
representativepress 3 years ago 7
Lol this jackass is talking 1990s. He wont tell you the the YEAR that his 17 UN inspectors arrived because he KNOWS he is talking about the first team that arrived and got kicked out of Iraq by Saddam like a year later. I think it was 1996 or 98. Bush gave Saddam a chance to let the Inspecors back in in 2002.The Iraq war started in 2003. Im pretty sure representativepress is really a memember of WCW a commuinist funded party. The like to distort stuff.
Xantheus07 3 years ago
@representativepress Inspectors were allowed in by Saddam?
"On January 27, 2003, Hans Blix reported to the United Nations Security Council on January 27, 2003, that Iraq has been cooperating with the weapons inspectors on process but has failed to demonstrate active cooperation on matters of substance.
1441 required active, full and immediate compliance without conditions and restrictions. Which Iraq didn't
Did you not fully understand what 1441 means?
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 "Inspectors were allowed in by Saddam?" Yes. 1441 is a UN resolution & the U.S. is a member state. Nowhere does 1441 say member states can take it upon themselves to decide what is compliance or how long to give the inspectors. 1441 stated that the Security Council shall "remain seized of the matter," NOT "member states do what ever you want." In fact, when 1441 was written, the words "all necessary means" were taken out to avoid a war trigger & "face serious consequences" put in.
representativepress 4 months ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 4 months ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@representativepress Where in the hell had the UN has the authority over the UN? You assert it but it's false, Again: the only part of the charter granting authority over member states is regarding the UNSC but the U.S. had a veto power there so it won't effect the U.S.s for it. Soverigns can do whatever they want unelss there is LAW prohibiting it. You make it sound like the UN had the authority over the member states that is party to a 1991 ceasefire WHICH IS NOT TRUE BY MEANS.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@representativepress The UN had no rule over the USA. You can assert it but it's false, the United States had a VETO power there so it does not effect us. So what you're saying that the UN had the rule over the member states that are party to a 1991 ceasefire agreement which is NOT TRUE BY ANY OTHER MEANS. Each member states party to a 1991 ceasefire had every right to determine for themselbes and the U.S. had a VETO POWER THERE. So it didn't affect them.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Treaties are law, the US signed the UN Charter. You should read the U.S. Constitution, seems you got the idea in your head that we AREN'T supposed to be a nation of laws and that acting like gangsters and pirates is OK. The war violated international law. Also, why and the world are you working so hard to make excuses for a man who is lying through his teeth? Bush claimed repeatedly that Saddam didn't let the inspectors in, Bush is shitting on you & you feel compelled to make excuses!
representativepress 4 months ago in playlist Liars & Criminals
@representativepress Yawn you never fully read what's UN 1441. The UN **NEVER** SAID that Iraq was fully complying with 1441 even after the invasion of Iraq. Even UN inspector David Kays said that Iraq was in material breach of UN 1441 after we invaded in 2003.
And cite the law its violated i dare you. The UN doesn't decided what's legal or illegal. We don't take order from the UN. A lot of nations that went to war without the UN. The UN had no authority over the USA and so does other nations.
Hperman09 4 months ago
Perhaps you read Bush's book where he misleads?: "Bush makes selective use of Blix's January report, citing elements that support the idea that Hussein was not cooperating and leaving out parts that indicate his government was. AND – Bush fails to mention 2 subsequent Blix pre-invasion reports in February and early March, weeks before U.S. bombs struck Baghdad! Those show Iraq cooperating with inspectors and the inspectors finding no significant evidence that Hussein was hiding WMD programs!"
representativepress 4 months ago
@representativepress read UNSCR 1441 closely. The exact text is: "Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access to all officials and other persons whom UNMOVIC....".
As it shown in 1.27.03, Hans Blix said Iraq was not fully complying.
Hperman09 4 months ago
The UN inspectors said we're saying because Iraq kept them blocking from inspecting. On March 2003, Hans Blix advised the UNSC that while Iraq's cooperation was "active", it was not "unconditional" and not "immediate", this means that Iraq was in violation of UN 1441. Cooperation required to be full and immediate and as Hans blix shows in 1.27. and 3.7.2003, Iraq failed. what did the UN did in the 1990s? They never take action so we can't wait for the UN when it proves to fail it's olibagions.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 "Bush left out that Blix later said, "Iraq has on the whole cooperated rather well so far" with inspectors. "The most important point to make is that access has been provided to all sites we have wanted to inspect and with one exception it has been prompt.""
representativepress 4 months ago in playlist Liars & Criminals
No the promise of 687 and 1441 was not because Iraq had WMDs but Iraq would fully comply with 1441.
As Blix said that on 1.27, 2003, and on 3. 7. 2003, that Iraq was not fully and immediately complying with 1441.
Cooperation--not disarmament of WMDs and verification--required to be fully and immediate without conditions and restriction, therefore the conclusion is inescapable, Iraq failed.
That means we cannot trust the inspections because it gives Iraq more time to hide their own WMDs.
Hperman09 4 months ago
UN inspectors and Hans Blix believed Iraq had WMDs, they just could not find them. That's why theyu said No evidence. Every intel from 150 different nations believed that Iraq had WMDs. You believed that the invasion of Iraq was about WMDs but wrong, it's about upholding 17 UN violations that Iraq made for a decade.
Also here's what Hans Blix said during the 2009-2011 Iraq inquiry in UK.
"I, like most people at the time, felt that Iraq retains weapons of mass destruction,".
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 "Blix reported on Feb. 14, 2003, that he had conducted 400 inspections at more than 300 sites without advance notice and without Iraqi interference. Although many proscribed weapons and items had not been accounted for, so far his inspectors had "not found any such weapons, only a small number of empty chemical munitions, which should have been declared and destroyed.""
representativepress 4 months ago in playlist Liars & Criminals
Like i said, cooperation of 1441 was required to be full,not disarm, and Iraq didn't as Blix said on both January and March 2003. Same arguments that was used in the 1990s, Iraq had somewhat get rid of their WMDs entirely then play games then booted out UN inspectors. Wikileaks found that WMDs, not nukes, were found in most Iraq's factualities leftover from 1980s-1990s so regardless whether they had threat to coalition force or not, it shows that Saddam still tried to hide their WMDs program.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Blix did NOT think that as time went on and that any one with brains could see that all the intel was being debunked. THe quote you use Blix has said he thought back in September 2002,
RACHAEL BROWN: However Dr Blix says as time wore on he became increasingly scepticl about the American and British reliance on intelligence from Iraqi defectors. Two months before Iraq's invasion, his inspectors had visited 500 sites and found no weapons of mass destruction.
representativepress 4 months ago in playlist Liars & Criminals
@representativepress once sanctions were uplifted. Top Iraqi sr offcials under Saddam were interviewed and all confirmed he had not forgotten about wmds.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
UN inspectors did not have authority to "require" more time. They requested it, and giving it would have violated the "last chance" deadlines set by 1441. Iraq had over 12 years to achieve compliance, and got caught making all-new violations by booted out UN inspectors. Read it 1441 carefully, Iraq was in violation of 1441. That means we cannot trust as result of the inspections as they being used by Iraq to hide their own WMDs. The whole point of 1441 was full compliance and Iraq failed.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@representativepress If the war violated International law, then why didn't the UN passed a resolution condemning the 2003 war? The 1991 GW didn't end the war, the hostility of it was suspended when Iraq and the UNSC signed a ceasefire agreement. Iraq promise to abide by it's 687 and Iraq failed to live up to it.
And Saddam admit to the Iraqi court he misled the world into believing that he had WMD and admit violating a ceasefire prior to the 2003 invasion hiding their WMDs from UN inspectors
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Speaking of Blix: "He says it's his firm view, and also that of most international lawyers, the war was illegal."
representativepress 4 months ago in playlist Liars & Criminals
@representativepress Hey can you help me comment on pduget please? i just send you a message? Please see it.
publicmario17 4 months ago
@representativepress Dude, you make some interesting points. The big picture is violation of multiple UN resolutions since 1990 which issue of wmds fall under. Regime change was a must. All sanctions, diplomacy had failed. When the threat of invasion is known, Saddam attempts to open up. He has been a survivor, a weasle, so long as he and his regimes survives, was his ultimate goal. He had it coming long before. ISG conclusion has made it clear that Saddam possessed all capabilities to rearm
HDNighster1 4 months ago
Blix said was a form of opinion, He's wrong. He doesn't cite the law that is violated. i know the Constitution and the UN charter far better than you ever be. In 1991 during a GW ceasefire, UNSC promise as 687 said that it would take action against Iraq if they failed to fully comply. for 12 years, Iraq didn't and the UNSC didn't secure peace and security to the area, therefore the UN violated it's 687.
The U.S. had no time to wait for the UN where the UN failed to live up to it's obligation.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 "He doesn't cite the law that is violated." The UN Charter. What right did Bush have to attack Iraq? None. AND what he did increased the threat of terrorism, just as the CIA predicted, AND killed many many people and cost a lot too. He needs to stand trial for what he did. Nazis were hung for what he did.
representativepress 4 months ago
@representativepress Because Iraq directly threatened our allies in the middle east and (unlike North Korea) had no superpower protecting it and(unlike Pakistan) had no strategic interests the government there. Noticed after 9/11, we go through the Intel name Curveball who said that Iraq had an active WMDs program and because of it, most of middle east wanted us to remove him.
And none of the 2003 invasion would have happened if Saddam fully comply with 1441 or just leave the country.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Saddam offered to leave, Bush refused. Bush claimed Saddam wanted to leave BUT wanted to bring "information on how to make WMD" with him. Do you believe Bush?
representativepress 4 months ago
@representativepress Saddam said he WOULD never leave Iraq ever. That's why there was a photo showing Saddam in the crowd when U.S. forces entered Baghdad in April of 2003. I was never convinced about Colin Powell and Bush and every Intel from 150 nations that Saddam had active WMDs program but it does not matter whether he had them or not, Saddam had to let the UN inspectors in as part of 1441 and he didn't which we could assume he had WMDs or not but that alone wasn't the reason to invade.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@representativepress...it's a fact because his past acts, and our assumption that Saddam had active WMDs program therefore, Iraq was a threat to the region(as 687 and 1441 said so).
And Kofi Annan and others said it was illegal, They were wrongly incorrect about the proper section of the UN charter. Besides Congress gave President Bush an authorizing the use of military force against Saddam so what's illegal? After all we don't take orders from the UN anyways since we are sovereign nation.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Congress authorized a CONDITIONAL authorization "enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq." "enforce" DOESN'T mean "violate" which is what Bush did. Resolution 1441 stated that the Security Council shall "remain seized of the matter." Bush undermined the inspection process which was being conducted. The Security Council's position was to continue the inspections.
representativepress 4 months ago
Understand that IRAQ FAILED TO FULLY COMPLY. That's the whole point of 1441. There is no way to continue the inspections because they could have been use time to time for Iraq to hide their own WMDs and play games with UN inspectors. We know this motive since the 1990s Saying that UN inspectors needed more time you have not properly understand the whole point of UN 1441. The "seized matter" automatically granted to the UN power but it doesn't apply to individual member states.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@representativepress Realize at that time, the U.S. wrote the language you constrains from member states from acting, and yet that the U.S. was not constrained by the lack of UN action AND NO ONE AT THAT TIME said the language can restrain. They might have said the Charter restrains them but not with 1441 does. This is made up theory by a few law experts that hold no water. The U.S. had a VETO power so it doesn't imply to them. You make it sound like the UN had the authority over the USA.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@representativepress Pffft, the UN can suck a dick. The UN promise Iraq that it would take action against Iraq if they fail to comply with 687. The UN does not and violated it's 687. For 12 years they did not do anything at all. That's 100% fault of the UN. That's why there is a debate regarding UN powers.
The UN failed to live up to it's promise, then it reduces UN power which is a good thing. It should never taken action in 1991, only giving nations to speak with each other.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 That's right man. Not only failed to comply with UN resols. But also Iraq was a signitary of the 1972 Biological, toxin convention, banning all it's biochem program. It failed to live up to this and continued it's wmd program. In late 2002, Iraq began to show relaxation on it's inspection only after US was mounting it's military in Kuwait in summer. Saddam was frantic. Even then Blix made it clear that Iraq was still not in compliance, inconsistent, , incomplete in it's 12,000 page
HDNighster1 4 months ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Yep, Saddam violated a ceasefire terms agreed upon suspending the hostilities of the 1990-1991 Gulf War. The U.S./UK and Iraq were in a constant state of war since 1990 and since Iraq was in violation of those terms, the U.S./UK, party to the 1990-1991 conflict, had every right to resume hostilities under UNSCR 678 and 687, and therefore justified action. I'm not saying that Bush action in 2003 was necessary but because of it, it was a right thing to go out and kick Saddam's ass.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Agree man. After resol 687, Iraq set up concealment committees, ie., CP3, headed by SSO, Kamil who later defected, to end of 1998. Multiple violations of No fly zone in north and in south. US and allies flew over 100,000 sorties to police these areas with Saddam still continue to fire antiaircraft. His military reach 80% of what it was prior to Guf War.All this was financed through selling of oil in black market, via Jordan, Turkey, oil for food scam.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Agreed, Saddam's forces kept on attacking U.S. and UK aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones almost daily in many years up until 2002 and this placed Saddam in violation of a 1991 ceasefire agreement. Also UNSCR 687 explicitly said: "Affirming the commitment of all Member States.......to bring their military presence in Iraq". This explicitly said the any member states has right to bring their military presence to Iraq if any case they failed to comply with UNSC Resolutions.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Saddam didn't give a fuck about his own people's welfare. As long as he and his regime survived. Over the long run, Iraq is a hell of alot better without him. He was hanged for crimes against humanity. well deserved.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Of course Saddam doesn't give a shit about his own people and we were righfully take him out of power. That's why Saddam divert his oil-for-funds to build his own military and his own places instead of the Iraqi people who were suffering under sanctions.
What i'm saying that after Saddam was removed, insurgency was arise costing thounsands of U.S. lives . Saddam actually kept his country in control. You're right the world is better without him.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 That' right man. But Saddam kept it under control with brute force. Insurgency is not a surprise. Sunni, Shite uprising since tension has been mounting since 650 AD. It is like a rubberband effect. You can pull with increasing tension. But will recoil. 1st time since 650 AD, Shite, Kurdish majority in Mesopotamia are in power and not supressed.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Of course they are no doubt that Saddam kept control of the country off the buffer of Iran. I wonder if Bush Jr know this or not? was he very aware of that invading Iraq and removing Saddam Hussein from power created civil war?
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Good thought man. Yes. So did the rest of adm. This was forseen long time ago. The problems of ethnic tension, tribal loyalties, security issues, # of soldiers neede"several hundred thousand", Eric Shinseki based on his expeirence and reports he recieved. Gen Zinni, prior to Franks, former Central Command did a 6 month study of hypothetical take over of Iraq and the issues that would come out of it. His prediction was correct as other military commanders, ie., Clark.
But this is moot
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Then IMO, Bush was an idiot for not awaring that. i admit he had balls to go out without the UN because dickhead UN failed to force Iraq compliance for 12 years. But i also find Bush at fault for not carrying out a post-invasion plan. Now we had spend billions trying to protect Iraq from being taken over by Iran. The 4,000 casualties of American and 104,000 Iraqi lives would have been saved if Bush admin would have plan this for the better.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 That's tight man. It wasn't his fault. Plan to invade has been going on long before Bush came into office due to Saddam's record. occupation plan wasn't thought about until the last 2 yrs. Officials that continually informed of the issues that will arise after occupation were ignored. OHRA headed by LTG Gardner had 2 months to plan. He had excellent ideas set out. But was replaced by Paul Bremer 2 months after occupation who did 2 major mistakes. Gen order #1 and 2, Debaath,demilitary
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@Hperman09 I don't think Iran will be an issue. They have seen what we have gone through. But will have some influence. Iran is not a big threat or an issue as media projects. For them, Israel and US are not a concern. But Pakistan is, a Sunni nation with 100 nuclear bombs, most extreme radicals, and weak government. This US concern as well.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Dude, Iran backed Shiite militias to carry out attacks on Coalition troops and Iraqi civilians, so it seemly like they wanted to take over Iraq, not to mention that Al-Qaeda is still present in Iraq and Iran even backed them as well. Further, Iran said they will wipe off Israel off the map with nukes. So yes Iran wanted to wipe off Israel off the maps and turn Iraq into a 3rd world shithole.
Cheney said in 1994, that invading Iraq would result a quagmire and "no exit" strategy.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 Dude, Iran backed Shiite militias to carry out attacks on Coalition troops and Iraqi civilians, so it seemly like they wanted to take over Iraq, not to mention that Al-Qaeda is still present in Iraq and Iran even backed them as well. Further, Iran said they will wipe off Israel off the map with nukes. So yes Iran wanted to wipe off Israel off the maps and turn Iraq into a 3rd world shithole.
Cheney said in 1994, that invading Iraq would result a quagmire and "no exit" strategy.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 We've been at proxy war with Iran since 1979, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq. But not to take over Iraq. we did them by eliminating their most fierce enemy, Saddam. Wiping off Israel off the map is a phrase that was misinterpretated. The propaganda worked in Israel's favor by harboring greater sanctions from UN against Iran.
Much intel of Talibs in 2001 came from Iran and assisted us. In fact, Iranian officials and Amid Khalizi, US rep to UN and Iraq had a meeting in Europe after invasion.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Iran was petrified. Iran offered talks of peace and forgeting past events, recognizing Israeli-Palestinan issue for treaty, and help us fight Al Qaeda, full UN/IAEA unconditional inspection of their nuclear program without concessions. . In return, we give them diplomatic relations, help them fight terrorist in their nation, ease tension between us and them. We said no.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@HDNighster1 I can't understand the way you write. Iran help us fight Al-Qaeda? Iran doesn't do for shit. Iran gave support for the Hamas and Hezbollah Al-Hejaz to carry out attacks on citizens in Israel and pretty much American interests in the middle east.
It doesn't matter. Just because Iran helped us doesn't mean they are innocent. Iran and Pakistan also gave support for the Taliban as they are a secular Islamic nation that hated the USA.
publicmario17 4 months ago
@publicmario17 That's right man, Iran will. Afghanistan is right in their border. Thye've kept a very close eye on A Qaeda. Info for us to get Talibs in 2001,much came from Iran. Like I said before, we've been at proxy war with Iran since 1979, we supported Iraq against Iran. Iran has fought us through other nations. When they see the most powerful nation at their doorstep, they will look for concessions. Infact, joint Israel-Iranian attack on Osirak. Iran failed, so Israel finished it in 1981.
HDNighster1 3 months ago
@publicmario17 As you know, we are not that innocent as well. We supported mujahaddens, AL qaeda during Soviet Afghan war and left Afghanistan to dry politically; thus we are suffering for creating this vacancy. Iranians and Talibs do not get along.But enemies. Talibs are Sunnis, who despise Shites. They assassinated Iranian Ambassador in Mazariff Shariff. When Talibs took over Herat, Iran mobilized their Army towards border to prevent their spread, as did Russia and Central Republics.
HDNighster1 3 months ago
@publicmario17 Haha really? Just to tell you Israel has killed WAY more civilians in Lebanon, and if Iran didn't support Hezbollah, all of the Southern of Lebanon would be Israel today, and most of Lebanon's oil is on the borders, so thanks to Iran, the Lebanese people can live in peace knowing Hezbollah will protect with the aid of Iran, but tell me, why did Israel retreat from the borders of Lebanon? because Hezbollah bombed them, just like they did to Lebanon..
Also, not Hamas
gamerdude1246 1 month ago
@Hperman09 page document submitted. Agree, UN failed since 1991. US/UK/Spain agreed on regime change.
HDNighster1 4 months ago
@Hperman09 "The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter." and as I pointed out, nearly every international law expert agrees it was an illegal war.
representativepress 4 months ago
@representativepress Fact, the U.S. initiated no war, Bush did start by invading in 2003 but not the war itself. Saddam started it by invading Kuwait in 1990. The U.S. beat Iraq in 1991 and after it, Iraq agreed to 687 to fully disarm their WMDs and fully comply with UN inspectors. Iraq didn't and the U.S. resume hostilities in 2003.
So in legal fact, the U.S. didn't start the 2003 war. It's only one Gulf War. You still have not name one part that the war was in violation of International law.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@representativepress France, Germany, China and all other member of the UN even said, "Iraq's non-compliance of 1441 posed an International threat to security and peace to the region" and it did NOT say one word about full disarmament or verification. Compliance needs to be full and as Blix shows in January and March 2003, Iraq failed.
And i don't get this from Bush, i don't like this guy either but to say i get it from Bush is totally ignorant and stupid. I know where i'm getting at.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@Hperman09 Did you watch this video? What is Bush saying three times here?
representativepress 4 months ago
@representativepress Yes i watch the video, Your video was mostly wrong. What did i say below? Saddam did allowed UN inspectors in then play games and starting hid things from them as Blix on January and March 2003 show on Iraq was failing to fully and immediately complying.
Hperman09 4 months ago
WW III is the only thing about truth. No God proved Himself without blood traditionally. Some how I heard my church preach that. Sin is the reason that God has fun... oops has meaning. Sorry pastor sir, I am not apologetic enough but I am evangelical.
beancube2008 3 years ago
Look,why bother to comment when it's obvious you dont follow foreign affairs.The inspectors were allowed in for weeks,this was after Saddam ignored them during the gulf war fiasco,he was embarrassed and was posturing until he realized that the world was on our side and would allow sanctions & action vs Iraq,so he then smartly allowed them in.Surprisingly,it's was reported all over the news and internet.All you have to do is google it,it isnt difficult to find.
Tekkhan 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch my trailer for "THE BLACK HAND" and help fight the power!
zzBHPzz 3 years ago
All lies!
If they dont listen, we will have no choice but to use instruments somewhat sharper than words.
Serious $h!t going down, people.
Prepare as though disaster is eminent.
Seriously.
CognitiveDisonance 3 years ago
bush is not fit to be city dog catcher much less president ,not only impeachment needs to be done but bush,cheney,rice,all these need to be tried for there part in these crimes
skyranger31 3 years ago
The NEWS is owned by this but fucker and his pals, DO NOT BELEIVE NEWS! NEWS IS THE ENEMY ALSO, THESTATIONS ARE OWNED BY THEM!
All Televsision is BAD for the HUMAN mind, TV is a RADIO BRAODCASTING DEVICE, SO IS YOUR BRAIN, TV IS NEGATIVE WAVEFORMS PROVEN TO HURT THE MIND< CAUSE DISEASE AND ALSO HYPONOTISE PEOPLE, THIS IS FACTS...
TV is the DEVIL you all want to avoid.
REPITITION = MIND CONTROL, what DOES TV REPEATE CONSTANTLY?, DISEASE COMMERCIALS, WHATS NEXT? WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE.
RobMonty248 3 years ago
Take a break and meditate, no need to hate and be irate, it's just another ploy of the fear machine to make you lose your cool so they can rule with ease though everyone sees the lie. See beyond the trees and it becomes clear there's scarcely a forest there at all. Take the power you surrender to their manipulations out of the loop. There's a stronger way to be. Much love to ya. Peace.
psychonautx26s 3 years ago
Learn quantum physics people, its something they all know and use against us, TV itself is HYPNOSIS its a proven fact, TV is running the world and everyone beleives it like facts, DONT PARTICIPATE WITH ECONOMY AND ECNOMY WILL CRASH, DONT BUY GAS AND THE PRICE WILL FALL, THERE WILL BE NOWHERE TO STORE THE FUEL< COSTING THEM STORAGE FEES, ALL WE NEED DO IS STOP SUPPORTING THE FUCKS BY BUYING THIER SCAMS, EVERYONE TAKE A WEEK OFF BUYING GAS AND THEY WILL FALL OFF THE CHARTS LIKE DEAD FLIES.
RobMonty248 3 years ago
Congress, do your job! "To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men."(A.Lincoln)This administration has justified the use of torture & depleted uranium.They've destroyed the lives of millions of families.These men are war criminals;they're murderers,liars & theives who have looted the country's treasury,& they really think they're going to get away with it & run off to Dubai & elsewhere abroad. THEY MUST BE IMPEACHED!JOIN A TRUTH MOVEMENT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD;START YOUR OWN!
mikebtko 3 years ago
I agree.....FUCK the bush committee up their stupid asses. They will go down one way or another.
cheddar21 3 years ago