Added: 4 years ago
From: guitmarc54
Views: 14,443
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you whining yank cunt..........nice voice fuckhead

  • They were jealous that you were here in the USA because of maybe they thought you were here in the US for money.

  • Any new updates?  What was the outcome? Good luck to you.

  • pasagdai lang oi'

    in-ana jud na'

  • isa lang ang dapat sa mga pulis na abusado kundi kamay na bakal para tumino

  • kapag ginawan ka ng istorya ng pulis wala kanang magagawa.nakakita nako ng ganyan.nung ayaw umamin pinagsusuntok ng pulis napilitan umamin.tuloy ang blotter

  • hey there! im sorry to hear about your bad experience here in cebu, actually im a cebuano. and i wonder how did the police accused you of something you never did or maybe you really did something wrong and they got you on track. i advised you go to the cebu police director for your grievances about the police harrassment.

  • raj86 once you are accused though not yet tried in court it is very difficult to find anyone more so a police director to believe you. Most accused are trully guilty but a few are trully innocent. No one is willing to help you except the attorneys but for a fee.

  • Back in early 90's. A cebu judge walked into Robertson and was looking at some pocket books. On mere suspicion as a thief he was arrested. No matter how he explained to the Store manager and the police no one believed or listened him, he was taken to the precinct and docketed for thief. It was only a few hours later when he was properly identified by the police chief when they started listening and believing him and was eventually released from the illegal arrest and detention.

  • There must be probable cause before entry. That is traces of cyber sex from IP terminal in that house. Presense of subject minors. Being the leasee he is subject to arrest. His guilt however must be proved beyond reasonable doubt after trial. Law enforcers here screwed up the tecnicalities and had rendered all evidence inadmissable. If it went into trial this guy could either show he has no participation in that crime or get convicted thereof. Pornography is not rape and not a major crime anyway

  • In the pretrial with the fiskal no wittness who were said to file complaints showed up to testify against me. four hearings in one year,and no lawyer want to prosecute CIDG for breaking the law and stealing my property. Or persue my legal action. What are my options for justice? They continue to apply the same tactics to others until now, breaking in homes with no warrant or real evidence...maybe hired by a third party to destroy someones life...

  • hi

    just a main concern regarding IP adress. most internet providers are not giving their clients sole property of IP adresses. most of the time IP address is shared with other internet users that is according to pldt and bayantel when i asked for a stable internet connection.

  • I don't know about the technicalities. But I have seen before that Law Enforcers could get sobpoena or whatever processes from courts to compell people or establishments to produce or allow them to seek things they want to see. They only have to satisfy some legal requirements such as affidavits and testimonies. Pin pointing the exact terminal from among the rest who share same IP's may not be difficult to do when they can get help from the provider.

  • for them to get documents from court it theior should be probablke cause not necesarily guilt beyond reasonable doubt. and most of the time IP addresses are not revealed to other parties unless the court orders the providers to do that, otherwise its a violation to right to privacy and security. affidavit and testimonies are filed in court as complaints thus a warrant of arrest should have been issued. in his case no warrant of arrest waa issued. clearly, its just an extortion thing from the PNP

  • I don't really know for sure but probable cause might have been established here by testimonies of police decoys or by real customers who engage in cyber sex. Then they have to identify the exact terminal or source. How to do it is a technical matter, might be done by hiring their own IT guy who convince the court about the strong probability that it came from subject house. That might be enough for courts to compell Provider to give the exact information they need.

  • Not one witness or suposed complaintants showed up for any of the following legal proceedures that took two years plus...Then susponed without investigation because of legal representivites willing to pursue a complaint against the powers that be...

  • They had no IP address, No credible witness to testify, just one no show named "jose uye" who had supposededly filed against me when I was in the USA. And ben Tulfo headed and recorded the whole event.. and followed through even to the prison follow ups and drug tests...and his tapes have not been revealed to me..,.My attorneys failed to ask for the tapes during the hearings saying first we beat these charges and use the tape after...?

  • why did he get arrested?

  • They accused me of cyber sex and witness said minors were involved but i just arrived in the country after a month in the states. All fabricated evidence and i had no right to defend my self from this bull s--t. all charges were dropped but the squad kept the personal property that pleased them...broke some and wore out my hustler magazines and stole a dildo.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more