I have watched this entire series several times over and paid very close attention. I believe his presentation is the most fitting for what happened on 9/11. One question I have, however, is that if they used Russian cruise missiles to hit the Pentagon, how could they have programmed them? Is there some sort of guidance system or wouldn't they be disabled?
@facebookprogrammer Great to hear that you watched this video. As for your comment, I don't know. I suspect that the technology needed to guide the missile is independent and could be replaced. Another possibility is that bribes purchased any necessary electronics required. Research the Kursk submarine story and you'll see how that event was as mysterious as Dimitri says it was.
@anthonyc31, hey just an FYI, I finally found a site that discusses the Granit missile and it states that a) their destination targets are already pre-programmed (ie. Pentagon, etc) and that b) oddly enough it was HALIBURTON of all companies believe it or not that helped the Russians lift the Kursk submarine out of the depths of the ocean.
@facebookprogrammer wow, great work ... can you please use youtube to private email me the links to what you found so i can update the support sites, thanks!
this is not the third truth ,this is the truth.wake up people this guy is an expert on nuclear work.we are under a scientific dictatorship and the woeld is waking up to all the lies .
@NowCryHavoc all the footages both amateur and professional wre given to CIA and collected ,selected or deleted and the ones selected changed by these times modern technologies with cgi after at least 1 month.
The chief problem I have with his statements about the digital manipulation of the aircraft is how does that explain the amateur footage shot from street level of an aircraft clearly crashing into the second tower?
@NowCryHavoc Look The Capricorn One of 1978. May be the script was made by the same (Jewish) team which did turn THE MOON LANDING of 1968?
The French (Jew?) J.-Ch. Deniau has done in 2002 a film 'FSB explodes Russia', about 1999's explosions of houses in Moscow and other cities, and a prevented explosion of the 4th house. The book is by the former Soviet Jew, now the US citizen, who returns in Russia and writes a book under the same title.
@NowCryHavoc Fair concern. As Dimitri proposes, and as the evidence shows, the ~45 "amateur" videos showing a "plane" hit the WTC had to have been leaked by the people involved. There is no other explanation since every WTC "plane" video has some type of serious anomaly. None of these videos stand up to close inspection. In fact, because there are so many of these "plane" videos, and each one shows digital manipulation, they help prove that they are fake. Google septemberclues faq_2
@NowCryHavoc Because they had the whole script of even well planed, prepared, part of it was making films using digital technics as in most movies that we have now days. Than posting made videos on "live news" TV at needed moments. Very simple.
There put: who owns TV owns goverment and set up 9/11 whole event.
@008klm I love how youtube people with no videos, no subscribers and with virtually no comments posted just "show up" out of the blue to post comments on this Dimitri video which has ~17,000 hits. These fuckballs try to post more BS about 9/11 and do the best to discredit Dimitri's testimony. FAIL. Fuck you fuckballs. You fool nobody with your disinfo BS comments.
@anthonyc31 That's right, no fooling anymore, nd this is why we are in trouble, it's preparations for WWIII. And Apparently it's going to be executed by the people of American government.
@aravenidiot ... you're a scumbag disinfo agent using some shiny new bullshit youtube account doing your scumbag job and taking cheap swipes at Dimitri's testimony. Your comments are clearly disinfo, since they are false and grossly inaccurate. Let me prove it. Your comment about aluminum being able to pierce through steel is disinformation. If that were true, the military would issue aluminum shells, not Depleted Uranium shells. That's ok, you're not here to debate facts, you're just a traitor.
@papapetad I found the Kevin Barret interview on another channel -- the blog post i listed has been updated with the new links. Here is Part 1: watch?v=-qHZ4O1O7VE
i haven't watched the second part yet, so maybe it's explained there... but a question comes to mind: at the beginning of the interview, khalezov claims nothing actually crashed into the WTC buildings and that someone manipulated the images digitally. later, he claims the government was worried that the planes carried nuclear warheads and thus ordered the controlled demolition to avoid further damage. so what is it now? why would they be worried about this, if the planes were a cover up?
@Caminacels Do watch part 2, but from what I remember (watching it for the 2nd time today) this is explained by the levels of authority orders/carriers of orders. Some people would know it's a cover up, some don't (at the time anyway...now I'm sure they're all well aware but would never admit to such a thing
@Caminacels I have the same exact question lol....If nothing crashed into the WTC then how did it blow up, what made it explode...wasnt it demolished to avoid more damage since it was known each tower had a nuclear devices inside ? He implies that 2nd truth is a lie, and it wasnt the terrorist who planted the briefcase inside the towers. Who shot the nuclear missile towards the pentagon ?
@IMTHETRUTHH It was just planted explosives, not planes. Study the countless photographs of the WTC where they say a plane hit. You can see very sharp right-angle cuts to the building, nothing like a natural looking "crash" site. The WTC floors were rigged with some explosives on those floors, that's all. This explains why there is so much controversy surrounding virtually all aspects of the alleged planes, their flights paths, speeds, passengers and living hijackers.
@anthonyc31 the question that comes to mind is... what does a "natural crash site" really look like?
i don't know man, i'm really trying to be open minded about all of this, but it seems to me many "alternative" theories about 9/11 raise even more questions than the official version...
US official were cought by surprise - US was attacked by Russian made misiles...poor things. That's why they had prepared digital video"live news" on "air plans hitting buildings".
Great technical explanation, Dmitri. TY!!!
It was real scary - I was there and was ready to die. But in the next morning when nothing else was happening - I knew right away that it was nothing but inside job. and that was even more creasy. Still is because big criminals're still not bought to justice. It will change
We now have to change this one: "In Capitalist USA we place our surprises under buildings not under christmas trees... That is for pussies my friend!"
The russians knew about this from day 1 but played along with the official version because they needed to sort out chechnya so they too exploited the war on terror spoof.Theres a lot though this guy is not saying like for instance how exactly adisarmed m3 nuke was launched at the pernagon and from where and why it didnt go off.
@aston0708 See the 2nd part for his in-depth explanation of the Pentagon event. Also, just so you know, this interview was supposed to be an intro to Dimitri's book. His book was blocked from being self-published on Lulu and no publisher thus far has taken it on. So, we're left with this interview and the evidence that Dimitri presents. Also, realize that Dimitri goes much deeper into the "who done it" in other interviews. See this link for more: tinyurl (dot) com / 432w33o
I wonder why nobody builds anything in place of the WTC, as they promised bigger and better? Huh? Why is the whole thing covered with a concrete sarcophagus, like Chernobyl? Any ideas? Can anybody in NY go there with a dosimeter and measure the radiation? It is very simple, wouldn't you say.
@FreeRussian Not sure what you mean here, the space now holds the Freedom Tower. There are two, well fall, fountains where the foundations of the original two structures stood and a quickly rising tower in the space where buildings 4 & 5 stood. There is no capstone.
Or did I miss something?!! If the whole core was dustified and this allowed the top sections to then plummet through at high speed, surely during this process we would have seen windows blown out as the path of least resistance from the bottom up?The description of things holding shape after turning to dust may explain what happened to those columns that seemed to survive then lost all shape and disintegrated? Maybe a breeze was all it took?! Good video though.
@lvquestpaddler I suggest watching from the 60minute mark on forward again, and also watch the first 10 minutes of part 2. 80% of the towers became dustified, allowing the top section that remained in tact, to fall at free fall speed down through the dustified section. You can see this clearly in part 2. The pulverizing shock wave does not cause windows to "blow out", it just turns everything it touches to dust.
Having gone down the CD>Judy Woods route this is v interesting. JW's molecular disassociation does not explain the sheer violence of their destruction or exactly HOW the buildings were "dustified"- the Hutchison effect is nowhere near answering this. My biggest question over DK's explanation is if a 150kt nuclear device essentially going off upwards through the building destroying it, why was there no "ground up" visible destruction from a pressure wave if it was turning the 300m inside to dust?
@lvquestpaddler i checked out Judy Wood's explanation as well. She did a good job of pointing out the massive amounts of dust at GZ, but she really failed to explain with any conviction what exactly caused the dust. She speculated about exotic energy weapons but she put the task to her audience to put the pieces together to figure out what happened. See these 2 articles for more info
@TheLagunaSunrise Look at the planes that crashed into the building. The one on the news WAS EDITED to make them seem like commercial flights! But yes, there were planes.
Why would they cover that up? The rest of dr dimitris theory could very well check out.
@karllegaladvice There were no planes and there were no hijackers. It was 3 controlled underground nuclear demolitions. Even if you believe "thermite" was used as the demolition tool, ask yourself, why would they use thermite AND planes? It's like having 2 major events on each building. It makes no sense. Dimitri's explanation of underground nuclear demolitions with regular explosions going off at the top of the WTC buildings makes the most sense. Think about it.
@TheLagunaSunrise Not so. Peoples reactions are a result of a multitude of things in this world. So learn the difference between "muslims" and Islam. We don't celebrate the deaths of innocent people. Then again, if people supporting a terrorist government like that of the USA is innocent behavior is questionable. You were slaves to the USA and you are slaves in war for the USA. When will you wake up and fight for God alone?
@TheLagunaSunrise Yes, that is a point where he is wrong. But don't disregard all of his theory. After all, the planes where not commercial airlines as the official story states. They were grey military grade. There are several high definition videos of them crashing into the towers So chill...
@karllegaladvice everyone on this planet got screwed that day ... even the assholes that actually perpetrated the deception -- they're just too stupid to realize it.
@optionsupdate The most thing id that his book is banned on Amazon, not like ALL OTHER BOOKS OF 9/11... this make me that this GOOD man tell the truth: see you his banned book on Amazon: The Third Truth
@Inigo37 this chaps analysis explains EVERYTHING about 911, all questions are answered, when the silverstien went ot collect money form insurance, I am surprised the insurers did not say "you did not need to topple building 7"
@optionsupdate Not everything, I have several years of intense investigation on 9/11, Dimitri is wrong in several areas: the towers was full plenty of explosives (as secundary force and to begin the collapse), the planes was real (totally sure on this, Dimitri is wrong), the thicknes of the wall colums is not as Dimitry says, wrong another one: at the first plane the thicknes of the colums was less than 1/2 inch, at the second crash level, the thicknes was 1inch.
@optionsupdate I have seen ALL videos on 9/11, I have three years of investigation on 9/11, I have spoken with a teacher of pilots here in spain that investigate 9/11 in USA, and was teacher of pilots during 9/11 in USA: Mitoa Edjan Campos: see his videos on youtube and vimeo (in spanish) amazing man. I have thousands and thousands of articles and books of 9/11, is one of my several "hobbys" in my free time.
@optionsupdate USA goberment, easy to see: put full plenty of explosives in the towers and press the red button of the nuclear charges and the planes operation, no doubt. Mossad of Israel aswell, free-masons. Laura Knigth tell to us that on 9/11 Israel betray to USA for the first time in history.
@optionsupdate See aswel Dr. Jody Wood. The morning at 9/11 there was a hurricane Erin on acean atlantic, if you search the trace of this hurricane you will see that in the hours of the collapse of the towers the hurricane go back in oposite direction: coincidence?: I don´t believe. If you search ALL the rest of hurricanes, severall (the less) moving erratic but in the bottom position, not in the north levels. The final debris of the collapse is a joke aswell: only 3%: its absurd.
the towers contained asbestos and also documents related to the financial scandals with mortgages. The buildings had to be demolished because of lawsuits regarding asbestos related sicknesses
@optionsupdate yes, i found many reports of Asbestos in the towers. Unfortunately so many "researchers" jumped the gun are buying the BS lies that the "fine mist" contained Asbestos, which in turn made the Rescue Workers sick. This is a myth. The radiation from the 3 nuclear blasts made the Rescue Workers sick, not the Asbestos. The Asbestos was turned to dust, along with the concrete and steel. It was no longer "Asbestos" per se, but rather dustified Asbestos.
this is the truth if you are not convince you are part of the fucking new world order nothing can turn steel and humans and ac units into dust in 10 seconds idiots
@144000V watching videos now that show the massive dust created is surreal. Don't forget all the rare radiation-related sicknesses that the 9/11 Rescue Workers are dying from. Radiation = Nuclear.
this is by far one of the best explanations given for how and why the twin towers fell. How can steel skyscrapers create so much dust falling. This is a great explanation and i will certainly spread the word. Sadly his site does not exist no more and from comments under mine you can see that someone claims he is missing. Someone wanted him to shut up. Either way from his explanations we should find out that there is a super huge hole in ground zero.
@KongKegso2 it's not a show ... it was documentary interview about Dimitri's 9/11 book, that is impossible to obtain. TPTB do not like the information that Dimitri shared ... and he's been missing for months.
i have a question: if the government puts nuclear missiles into the planes and sends one into the pentagon, they clearly know about the risk to nuke entire washington and new york and therefor this must be their goal. then all of a sudden they feel they need to demolish the WTC in order to prevent the missiles from exploding in the top of the building - if they don't want that WHY THE HELL DID THEY PUT THEM INTO THE PLANES IN THE FIRST PLACE??? doesn't make sense to me!! please explain me!
@waugse sorry, but i have absolutely no idea what you're basing your comments on. Nothing you have stated is remotely close to what Dimitri explained in this 2 part documentary.
@anthonyc31 sorry, i thought it is the general opinion/knowledge that the government is behind the attacks. maybe i got mixed up between all the information i looked up in the last couple days.
Anybody care to explain the fact that theres video of fire fighters in the lobby of the T.C. when it came down on them, and they survived and didn't fall into a radioactive pit and die.
@anthonyc31 So i guess you can't answer the question of how the lobby stayed at ground level when by according to the video it should have fell into a radioactive hole, but surviving firemen that were in the lobby at the time with video says different, but go ahead and delete my post anyways.
@sabbath178 Yoiu can guess whatever you want. There were multiple physical events going on post detonation, as can be seen in numerous videos. That includes, dustification of the buildings by way of the crushed zone, and the process of watching the undamaged top section of both towers fall down through this dust. This is explained in the first 10 minutes of part 2. As for your claims of firefighters, that's just your baseless comments unless you can show proof.
@anthonyc31 Since I can't post the link of the video, I'll give your viewers the title to type in and watch for themselves. just type, inside the world trade center while callapse. It cleary shows the building fell down around them and the lobby stayed at ground level. No firefighters died from a nuclear explosion, nobody got vaporized or fell into a Radioactive pit.
I TOTALLY believe in Dimitry, but the towers was FULL PLENTY of explosives aswell. Anyone try to buy his book? try to buy in Amazon. The book is out of print.
I have several books of 9/1, one of this is the Laura Knight´s book of 9/11, which I can get only in pilulerouge. But the book of the Dimitry is imposible to get, because they write the truth.
@Inigo37 I don't have his book but personally, i don't need it to be convinced ... i watched his presentation and did my own research to verify his claims. I posted some of my findings in a blog post (link is in the video description) that supports Dimitri's claims. At this point, I don't have many questions left about 9/11 -- i feel very satisfied that i know what happened. I wish more people would watch this video, but that's beyond my control. People are waking up slowly.
@anthonyc31 The most incledible and absurd story is the thruth, this is why the most people can´t wake up, the more great lie, the more easy to believe, simply than this. Dimitry have wrong in several small areas: the second plane was real, i am totally sure on this, and the towers was full plenty of explosives, totally sure aswell.
His book is imposible to get, why? simply: because he tell us the thuth!!! I am happy to set / speak with intelligent people like you, sadly not like the rest .
@anthonyc31 You can see in youtube the old videos of 50´ of undergound nuclear explosions, and the numbers is ok with the Dimitry says to us: the numbers of kt with the numbers of richter scale is ok. And you can see the videos of 15-20cm of concrete pulverized on NY on 9/11, explosive can´t do that. The diferent aproach of the second plane its due to the diferents positions (and lens) of the cameras nothing more, i am ottally sure that was a second plane. The first plane was a smal plane.
@Inigo37 No planes hit the WTC. Absolutely none. See my "9/11 - No planes" playlist and visit by blog. It was explosives that detonated at the top of the WTC towers to simulate plane crashes. ALL video footage showing planes has been proven to be fake. Most of we saw on TV was fake (fake planes hitting WTC, fake witnesses, etc.) The only thing real was watching the buildings be demolished to dust. That was the only thing real. 9/11 was a mega deception -- the biggest lie ever.
@anthonyc31 While I did think that theory was bizarre and ridiculous for a long time, I'm now starting to believe that there were zero planes involved in 9/11. It is pretty standard to know these days that all the media footage was in fact TV fakery. The question I have is who and how did they generate the sound of a plane flying at a low altitude before the buildings exploded upon "impact?" You can clearly see flashes going off before the CGI planes hit on TV. Was sound prerecorded and used?
@Sambuca6178 I know. I went through the same process when i first watched Dimitri's interview. I was like "no planes??? this is total BS". I paused watching the interview and spent several days (full time) looking into the no planes angle. the NOSE OUT video sold me. I realized that Dimitri was telling the truth and continued watching. Not only does his explanation unravel the plane confusion, he goes one step further to show that it doesn't matter, planes or no planes, it was a controlled demo.
@anthonyc31 I have several years of INTENSE investigation on 9/11, I know a pilot teacher that was direct investigation on the data of the black box of the "plane" that hit the Pentagon. The most amazing to me of 9/11 is the most simple: how they to prevent ANY QUALITY or near video of the second plane when hit the tower? for me 9/11 is nothing, all the things that you see in the hollywood films when you eat popcorns allready exist, at least I think so.
@Massaricossudo You can see clearly the sound of a big explosión just the second plane hit the tower, for me, this sound is clearly the sound of explosives, not a plane crash in to a building, listen:
Youtube: 9-11 WTC Attacks Original Sound. Steve Vigilante
Most people don't even want to look at this theory.
They think of it as being a rediculaus idea, because they associate a 'Nuclear Demolition' with the typical nuclear explosion we're all so familiair with; big shokwave huge light/radiation.
Also they have a false interpetation of what this shock wave is like exactly.
If only people could shut up and listen.
The kind of explosion as described by Mr Khalezov could perhaps be a real possibility, watch the vid..
@Tautoulogic To be clear, the 9/11 events other than the WTC towers collapsing are his theory, but the explanation of how the 3 WTC towers collapsed. are Dimitri's actual testimony, not theory. This is why Dimitri Khalezov's explanation of the 9/11 events are the most powerful and believable. Skeptics and shills will constantly claim "this witness said this" or "this witness said that" to try and prove 9/11 theories wrong ... well this witness, Dimitri Khalezov, says it was a nuclear demolition.
I'm staying open to all this, I still think Judy Wood's stuff explains more thought the video of the towers coming down like a concrete waterfall looks more like a nuke explosion. Problem is, how did the nuke not destroy all the other buildings around, and only brought down the towers? How did it go straight up into the towers and not spread out and take out the asphalt streets above in one big circle? How did they place the nuke that deep --- digging in a major city and no one noticed?
@jerichomutant I watched Judy Woods explain 9/11. She did a good job of showcasing that the WTC buildings came down to dust, but was about it. She provided a flimsy and half baked explanation as to how the buildings actually turned to dust. Visit my blog and see 2 posts about Judy Woods
Blog: ac31 (dot) blogspot (dot) com
Article 1: Dimitri Khalezov reply to Judy Wood supporter
Article 2: Review: Judy Wood "New Hiroshima" WRT Dimitri Khalezov "9/11: Third Truth"
@jerichomutant These are my main questions too. It's just not coming across scientifically to me. Why would the towers turned into the "crushed zone?" He doesn't explain this well at all. I can understand the pulverization occurring underground because of the tight rock causing so much resistance, but how would the the building and human beings be all pulverized when there isn't any resistance really? What is causing the pulverization of the towers? This is not convincing me now.
@organboi Dimitri explains this very clear in a 20 minute section. I'm not sure how much more clearly it needs to be explained. The WTC is anchored to the ground. All tremors and vibrations that occur at or near the base of the tower's foundation will relay up the tower (75% up), much like an electrical current. Following this logic, anything and everything touching the building, floors ,etc. will be affected. The nuclear detonation is causing a massive shock wave to run up the tower.
@jerichomutant Actually, the WTC bathtub was in fact damaged. Visit my blog: ac31 (dot) blogspot (dot) com and read the post called "Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov's 9/11 Testimony". In it, i list links to evidence that supports the testimony and claims made by Dimitri organized in various categories. See the "Damage to the WTC "Bathtub"" section for a few links.
am i crazy, or does this video look like it has been edited? it looks EXTREMELY choppy at many points - also looks like some video footage has been repeated with different audio. the video quality is conveniently low enough that you cant match speech to their mouths. seems kinda fishy that every time he pulls a document the entire screen gets covered as if it were trying to hide things and take away your attention from the people. i don't know, but this might be fake.
@vanillacokejunky Not fake. Read the description, you will see that yes, i edited this video from the original 26-part video. However, no alteration to Dimitri or the interviewer's comments were made.
oke i found it. It`s on September Clues Epilogue at 04.18 - an italian TV Report showed an interview with a police men who noticed the clocks on the walls stoppet at 8:45 am.
I have seen an interview where a firemen said - all the clocks where standing still at the same time - but i`ve seen so many videos i can`t find it so i cannot post it :(
But at 0:58:12 Dimitri is talking about Electro-magnetic Pulse..which can destroy electronic and electric around.
@ManAgainstCrime it should be alleged AA F77 hit the Pentagon and alleged AA F11 hit WTC 1 (North Tower). Where do you see that listed incorrectly? I will try to correct if possible. Also, i think you'll find Part 2 very interesting (~40 minutes into Part 2, i think) where the TV news completely mixes up the flights and then re-organize them in subsequent clips.
@voodoowichdoctor "I don't mean to nit-pick either, but flight 11 and flight 77 did not strike anything. ACCORDING TO AMERICAN AIRLINES RECORDS NEITHER FLIGHT TOOK OFF ON 9/11"
I was quoting the interviewer and pointing out his minor error. No biggie, but debunkers look for shit like that, as you know. Again, the interviewer said that "flight 11 struck the Pentagon" and flight 77 struck the North tower". It was, of course, the other way around (in the official narrative). Never mind.
@voodoowichdoctor voodoo, please put your thinking around missles (or planes) on hold ... and consider the evidence presented by Dimitri in this video, along with the evidence under: "Real planes did not hit the WTC - Planes were CGI digital fakes" ... tinyurl (dot) com / 432w33o
@stelley08 yup ... i believe that multiple conventional explosions detonated at the top floors (where the "plane" supposedly hit) ... this may be where thermite was used.
@stelley08 thanks and please share with your friends ... i have a blog that features a few articles that provide additional support for Dimitri's claims (Rescue workers suffering from rare radiation-related cancers and illnesses, damage to WTC bathtub, etc.) Visit: ac31 (dot) blogspot (dot) com
@anthonyc31 i have suscribed to your channel and have seen the blogs, all very interesting. Up until yesterday i had no knowledge of nuclear demolition and certainly didn't even consider that as an option to bring down the towers. do you think that this video will ever be played or aired on all major tv networks?
@stelley08 Anything is possible, however, i think it would be very unlikely to see this information on TV because the people that planned and executed 9/11 are still alive and essentially control main stream media. They will prevent this information from getting out broadly. The controlled demolition of the WTC towers is just one issue ... "no Muslim hijackers" and "no planes" has huge implications and directly affects the fake war on terrorism and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Yes, 911 was indeed a show of horrors.....and while we are here rehearsing it.... millions of people are being terrorized because of it..... A moment of silence for the people in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan that are being terrorized by the 911 terrorists.
OK if this gets through,I think these bustards are cenzoring us...I lost a long response yesterday and all kind of weird stuff,exactly like when I was developing some activity in relation with other bone-revealing video with the CIA wistleblower Chip Tatum..
Sounds very believable theory,even though an unexpected angle and facts...Sound even more believable than Judy Woods theory about Hutchison effect destruction of the towers...and even more believable than the nano-thermite theory...Time will show I guess.
@galimir Nicely put, thanks for taking time to watch. Note that Dimitri provides testimony (not theory) about the WTC demolitions being nuclear. He makes it clear that he is offering his opinion about the other events of 9/11. I've reviewed a lot of 9/11 information and theories ... 1) Thermite was a reasonable first guess, 2) Judy Wood makes good observations about dust but fails to provide a solid explanation as to the cause. In the end, Dimitri's explanation is the most detailed and logical.
@deadlymayonnaise look whether or not there was a plane, the manner in which the towers fell was NOT as result of jet fuel burning at the top floor. end of story. did you actually watch this video?
@shariotoflove don't waste your time with mayonaise boy, he's full of crap. He's just trying to instigate people and has no intention to discuss facts.
The amount of trolls spreading blatant disinformation especially on this video is unreal. Bullshit arguments that are intended to go nowhere, only waste your time. You appear to have a nose for sniffing them out anthony, just delete their comments immediately and dont even give them the time of day.
@Seanyboyh thanks for your comment ... i agree, the trolls definitely come out in droves to try and fight Dimitri's explanation. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt so i let them post but you're right, i should just start fighting fire with fire and just delete BS posts.
Could only watch to the point where he couldnt provide credentials and took out the pictures of him posing in a military uniform like the Swedish serial killer who shot children... People like to pretend... And like War of the Worlds? Feed peoples imaginations with overwheling mis-information.
@shawzie1916 i like to focus on what people say, not what they wear. After watching his 4 hour interview (many times over) and watching/listening to his other interviews (Fetzer & Barret), I find Dimitri to be very credible and his explanation becomes only more clear with each additional interview. Dimitri has provided deep insight and has addressed more unanswered questions about 9/11 than anyone. So, focus on his uniform's authenticity all you want - but you're doing yourself a big disservice.
@anthonyc31 Believe me when I say while arrested by the police, if you stick to your story they will believe you eventually. But I can go to the costume shop and purchase a soviet uniform if I wanted and take pictures in the local photobooth. You have an obsession where when you look for something long enough you disregard information that support the contrary. If a nuclear warhead was fractured, all of manhatton would have been destroyed. A bullet is large enough to fracture a warhead.
@shawzie1916 ...i believe nothing you say, and you should believe nothing i say. Use your brains and research this yourself. Read this carefully .... I am patient with people that ask questions or that post valid comments (e.g. spire) ... however you are doing neither. That means you're here to disrupt and i have zero patience for you. If you post one more BS comment, i will block you. Start making sense fast or find something else to do.
@MrShaz00 Have you actually watched the videos or are you just posting baseless comments? So far, it seems like you have not watched the videos so your opinion is utterly useless. I suggest, you watch the videos and then comment / ask questions. Otherwise i will delete all your comments and block you. Very simply. You don't watch the video, you don't get to comment.
I'm reading a few of your comments I have a few questions for you guys please I'm not trying to be a smart ass here but while watching this Dimitri Khalezov telling us what really happen his claim that 3 150 megaton nuclear bomb destroyed both WTC North, South and building 7 tuning most of them into dust so he claims But who can verify his story does any body know a nuclear physicist? Did building 7 really became a building of dust prior to the collapse? Is there any avoidance of that?
@eduardoobregon I don't know. I've tried to find out, but in one post that i found, Dimitri made it clear that the guy was not interested in getting into the lime light so his identity was not shared.
US officials detonated 3 underground nuclear devices that took down WTC 1,2 and 7. Apparently, the officials were duped into doing this by "intelligence" lies claiming that Osama Bin Laden planted 2 nukes at the top of the WTC (where the "planes" hit, i.e. explosions went off). The undetonated nuclear missile that hit the Pentagon added credibility (explains Pentagon "no plane" coverup). US officials panicked and took down the towers to save millions in NYC. Hence the massive ongoing coverup.
US officials detonated 3 underground nuclear devices that took down WTC 1,2 and 7. Apparently, the officials were duped into doing this by "intelligence" lies claiming that Osama Bin Laden planted 2 nukes at the top of the WTC (where the "planes" hit, i.e. explosions went off). The undetonated nuclear missile that hit the Pentagon added credibility (explains Pentagon "no plane" coverup). US officials panicked and took down the towers to save millions in NYC. Hence the massive ongoing coverup.
@anthonyc31 If Osama bin Laden got his hands on a nuke, the US intelligence agencies would have known the minute he got it... No country admitted to losing a nuke which would be mainstream news in 24 hours because of the seriousness of the situation... Radiation levels in NYC ground zero are only slightly higher than usual due to Radioactive Radon gas from burning fossil fuels. In my home I have a radon raditation filter to stop this after I got my home heating serviced.
@shawzie1916 "Osama planted suitcase nukes in the WTC" was the BIG lie told to US officials and politicians. Osama is a strawman .. he never had nukes and had nothing to do with 9/11. Officials were duped into destroying the towers to prevent "suitcase nukes" from detonating in the atmosphere. US officials, thinking they had to save NY, detonated all 3 built-in underground nuclear devices at WTC 1,2 and 7. This is why the massive coverup ... they did it themselves.
@shawzie1916 As for radiation, that is one of the biggest pieces of evidence that nuclear detonations actually went off at Ground Zero. You realize that the very name Ground Zero means "The point on the earth's surface directly above or below an exploding nuclear bomb." Unusually high number of 9/11 Rescue Workers are now dying from rare radiation-related sicknesses and cancers. The evidence is overwhelming.
@anthonyc31 Radon radiation which is not emitted from a Thermonuclear explosion...Ok. Ground Zero could also be another term used to describe a place of total destruction, the epicenter of the chaos below which is the point where damage is at its greatest. Workers are dying due to exposure to gases and toxens released due to an entire building filled with things while burned are toxic to breath.
WELL WORTH the watch, thanks for the upload
sc882tt 2 days ago
I have watched this entire series several times over and paid very close attention. I believe his presentation is the most fitting for what happened on 9/11. One question I have, however, is that if they used Russian cruise missiles to hit the Pentagon, how could they have programmed them? Is there some sort of guidance system or wouldn't they be disabled?
facebookprogrammer 1 week ago
@facebookprogrammer Great to hear that you watched this video. As for your comment, I don't know. I suspect that the technology needed to guide the missile is independent and could be replaced. Another possibility is that bribes purchased any necessary electronics required. Research the Kursk submarine story and you'll see how that event was as mysterious as Dimitri says it was.
anthonyc31 1 week ago
@anthonyc31, hey just an FYI, I finally found a site that discusses the Granit missile and it states that a) their destination targets are already pre-programmed (ie. Pentagon, etc) and that b) oddly enough it was HALIBURTON of all companies believe it or not that helped the Russians lift the Kursk submarine out of the depths of the ocean.
HOLY SHIT!!!!
facebookprogrammer 3 days ago 2
@facebookprogrammer wow, great work ... can you please use youtube to private email me the links to what you found so i can update the support sites, thanks!
anthonyc31 3 days ago
this is not the third truth ,this is the truth.wake up people this guy is an expert on nuclear work.we are under a scientific dictatorship and the woeld is waking up to all the lies .
144000V 3 weeks ago 2
@144000V
Lets wake everybody up and change this ugly selfish world.
Massaricossudo 2 days ago
@NowCryHavoc all the footages both amateur and professional wre given to CIA and collected ,selected or deleted and the ones selected changed by these times modern technologies with cgi after at least 1 month.
kato093 3 weeks ago
The RADIO BONUS -
9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discuss
rusmalbel 4 weeks ago
The END of the ISRAEL.
The rabbins (hahams) told and retold - not to creat a jewish state.
The Jew-Hebrews without a country were free to steal riches and stage wars LEADED BY THE SPIRIT COMMAND in many countries.
It was a Dragon with Only one head and many bodies. INVINCIBLE.
A country unites the forces - before implanted in many countries where the Jews had succedeed to govern in shadow.
After 1947-2001, the Dragon has only one body - Israel, & many heads (of States). Finally IT CAN BE KILLED
rusmalbel 4 weeks ago
The chief problem I have with his statements about the digital manipulation of the aircraft is how does that explain the amateur footage shot from street level of an aircraft clearly crashing into the second tower?
NowCryHavoc 4 weeks ago
@NowCryHavoc Look The Capricorn One of 1978. May be the script was made by the same (Jewish) team which did turn THE MOON LANDING of 1968?
The French (Jew?) J.-Ch. Deniau has done in 2002 a film 'FSB explodes Russia', about 1999's explosions of houses in Moscow and other cities, and a prevented explosion of the 4th house. The book is by the former Soviet Jew, now the US citizen, who returns in Russia and writes a book under the same title.
rusmalbel 4 weeks ago
The big part pictures the TV show, from a Jew GUSSINSKI TV station, a 'prominent' Hebrew 'eased out' in 1999.
THE JEWS in SU & Russia do not go in court - they are above the LAW.
In USA they are called RUSSIAN MAFIA - they are not russian! they are ALL JEWS.
Look at bunch of them proudly striding across Israeli TV studios, brassing THE HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of US$ they stole from the SU in 1990-es.
US-JEWS-made film in 2008, 'The 3rd calamity of Russia' also aims at Putin, NOT AT THE JEWS !!
rusmalbel 4 weeks ago
@NowCryHavoc Fair concern. As Dimitri proposes, and as the evidence shows, the ~45 "amateur" videos showing a "plane" hit the WTC had to have been leaked by the people involved. There is no other explanation since every WTC "plane" video has some type of serious anomaly. None of these videos stand up to close inspection. In fact, because there are so many of these "plane" videos, and each one shows digital manipulation, they help prove that they are fake. Google septemberclues faq_2
anthonyc31 4 weeks ago 2
@anthonyc31
911 was a FREE MASON OPERATION.
Massaricossudo 2 weeks ago
@NowCryHavoc Because they had the whole script of even well planed, prepared, part of it was making films using digital technics as in most movies that we have now days. Than posting made videos on "live news" TV at needed moments. Very simple.
There put: who owns TV owns goverment and set up 9/11 whole event.
ludmilalloyd 3 weeks ago
@NowCryHavoc
Go figure.... Many 911 inside jobbers spooking NY on 911....
Massaricossudo 3 weeks ago
@008klm I love how youtube people with no videos, no subscribers and with virtually no comments posted just "show up" out of the blue to post comments on this Dimitri video which has ~17,000 hits. These fuckballs try to post more BS about 9/11 and do the best to discredit Dimitri's testimony. FAIL. Fuck you fuckballs. You fool nobody with your disinfo BS comments.
anthonyc31 4 weeks ago
@anthonyc31 That's right, no fooling anymore, nd this is why we are in trouble, it's preparations for WWIII. And Apparently it's going to be executed by the people of American government.
Snowman374th 2 weeks ago
@BorisAndriessen
Bush is just a cock sucker.... He loves freemason cocks....
Massaricossudo 1 month ago
@aravenidiot ... you're a scumbag disinfo agent using some shiny new bullshit youtube account doing your scumbag job and taking cheap swipes at Dimitri's testimony. Your comments are clearly disinfo, since they are false and grossly inaccurate. Let me prove it. Your comment about aluminum being able to pierce through steel is disinformation. If that were true, the military would issue aluminum shells, not Depleted Uranium shells. That's ok, you're not here to debate facts, you're just a traitor.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
@anthonyc31 fuck the Kevin barret videos are no longer available. I'm really perplexed about the "who done it" bit. Any other source of that?
papapetad 1 month ago
@papapetad I found the Kevin Barret interview on another channel -- the blog post i listed has been updated with the new links. Here is Part 1: watch?v=-qHZ4O1O7VE
anthonyc31 1 month ago
@anthonyc31 Thank you!
papapetad 1 month ago 2
@anthonyc31
He is just a fucking asshole.
Massaricossudo 1 month ago
i haven't watched the second part yet, so maybe it's explained there... but a question comes to mind: at the beginning of the interview, khalezov claims nothing actually crashed into the WTC buildings and that someone manipulated the images digitally. later, he claims the government was worried that the planes carried nuclear warheads and thus ordered the controlled demolition to avoid further damage. so what is it now? why would they be worried about this, if the planes were a cover up?
Caminacels 1 month ago
@Caminacels Do watch part 2, but from what I remember (watching it for the 2nd time today) this is explained by the levels of authority orders/carriers of orders. Some people would know it's a cover up, some don't (at the time anyway...now I'm sure they're all well aware but would never admit to such a thing
papapetad 1 month ago
@Caminacels I have the same exact question lol....If nothing crashed into the WTC then how did it blow up, what made it explode...wasnt it demolished to avoid more damage since it was known each tower had a nuclear devices inside ? He implies that 2nd truth is a lie, and it wasnt the terrorist who planted the briefcase inside the towers. Who shot the nuclear missile towards the pentagon ?
IMTHETRUTHH 3 weeks ago
@IMTHETRUTHH It was just planted explosives, not planes. Study the countless photographs of the WTC where they say a plane hit. You can see very sharp right-angle cuts to the building, nothing like a natural looking "crash" site. The WTC floors were rigged with some explosives on those floors, that's all. This explains why there is so much controversy surrounding virtually all aspects of the alleged planes, their flights paths, speeds, passengers and living hijackers.
anthonyc31 3 weeks ago
@anthonyc31 the question that comes to mind is... what does a "natural crash site" really look like?
i don't know man, i'm really trying to be open minded about all of this, but it seems to me many "alternative" theories about 9/11 raise even more questions than the official version...
Caminacels 3 weeks ago
US official were cought by surprise - US was attacked by Russian made misiles...poor things. That's why they had prepared digital video"live news" on "air plans hitting buildings".
Great technical explanation, Dmitri. TY!!!
It was real scary - I was there and was ready to die. But in the next morning when nothing else was happening - I knew right away that it was nothing but inside job. and that was even more creasy. Still is because big criminals're still not bought to justice. It will change
ludmilalloyd 1 month ago
"In Soviet Russia we... we..."
...
Dammit!
We now have to change this one: "In Capitalist USA we place our surprises under buildings not under christmas trees... That is for pussies my friend!"
LordPrestimion 1 month ago
The russians knew about this from day 1 but played along with the official version because they needed to sort out chechnya so they too exploited the war on terror spoof.Theres a lot though this guy is not saying like for instance how exactly adisarmed m3 nuke was launched at the pernagon and from where and why it didnt go off.
aston0708 1 month ago
@aston0708 See the 2nd part for his in-depth explanation of the Pentagon event. Also, just so you know, this interview was supposed to be an intro to Dimitri's book. His book was blocked from being self-published on Lulu and no publisher thus far has taken it on. So, we're left with this interview and the evidence that Dimitri presents. Also, realize that Dimitri goes much deeper into the "who done it" in other interviews. See this link for more: tinyurl (dot) com / 432w33o
anthonyc31 1 month ago
@aston0708
All governments are corrupt.
Massaricossudo 1 month ago
I wonder why nobody builds anything in place of the WTC, as they promised bigger and better? Huh? Why is the whole thing covered with a concrete sarcophagus, like Chernobyl? Any ideas? Can anybody in NY go there with a dosimeter and measure the radiation? It is very simple, wouldn't you say.
FreeRussian 1 month ago
@FreeRussian excellent point.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
@FreeRussian
I wanna be at least 1000 miles from there.
Massaricossudo 1 month ago
@FreeRussian Not sure what you mean here, the space now holds the Freedom Tower. There are two, well fall, fountains where the foundations of the original two structures stood and a quickly rising tower in the space where buildings 4 & 5 stood. There is no capstone.
aravenidiot 1 month ago
@BorisAndriessen great to see more and more people take time to watch Dimitri.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
Related story:
Extreme Prejudice - CIA Whistle Blower Susan Lindauer PDX 911Truth
watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg#t=25m40s
pahtai11365 1 month ago
@pahtai11365 i don't know what to make of Susan Lindauer yet, but her story is interesting.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
Or did I miss something?!! If the whole core was dustified and this allowed the top sections to then plummet through at high speed, surely during this process we would have seen windows blown out as the path of least resistance from the bottom up?The description of things holding shape after turning to dust may explain what happened to those columns that seemed to survive then lost all shape and disintegrated? Maybe a breeze was all it took?! Good video though.
lvquestpaddler 1 month ago
@lvquestpaddler I suggest watching from the 60minute mark on forward again, and also watch the first 10 minutes of part 2. 80% of the towers became dustified, allowing the top section that remained in tact, to fall at free fall speed down through the dustified section. You can see this clearly in part 2. The pulverizing shock wave does not cause windows to "blow out", it just turns everything it touches to dust.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
Having gone down the CD>Judy Woods route this is v interesting. JW's molecular disassociation does not explain the sheer violence of their destruction or exactly HOW the buildings were "dustified"- the Hutchison effect is nowhere near answering this. My biggest question over DK's explanation is if a 150kt nuclear device essentially going off upwards through the building destroying it, why was there no "ground up" visible destruction from a pressure wave if it was turning the 300m inside to dust?
lvquestpaddler 1 month ago
@lvquestpaddler watch?v=xM9dvRt9xu4
antonfilth 1 month ago
@lvquestpaddler i checked out Judy Wood's explanation as well. She did a good job of pointing out the massive amounts of dust at GZ, but she really failed to explain with any conviction what exactly caused the dust. She speculated about exotic energy weapons but she put the task to her audience to put the pieces together to figure out what happened. See these 2 articles for more info
tinyurl (dot) com / 432w33o
tinyurl (dot) com / 7ydwoov
anthonyc31 1 month ago
@TheLagunaSunrise Look at the planes that crashed into the building. The one on the news WAS EDITED to make them seem like commercial flights! But yes, there were planes.
Why would they cover that up? The rest of dr dimitris theory could very well check out.
karllegaladvice 1 month ago
@karllegaladvice There were no planes and there were no hijackers. It was 3 controlled underground nuclear demolitions. Even if you believe "thermite" was used as the demolition tool, ask yourself, why would they use thermite AND planes? It's like having 2 major events on each building. It makes no sense. Dimitri's explanation of underground nuclear demolitions with regular explosions going off at the top of the WTC buildings makes the most sense. Think about it.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
@TheLagunaSunrise Not so. Peoples reactions are a result of a multitude of things in this world. So learn the difference between "muslims" and Islam. We don't celebrate the deaths of innocent people. Then again, if people supporting a terrorist government like that of the USA is innocent behavior is questionable. You were slaves to the USA and you are slaves in war for the USA. When will you wake up and fight for God alone?
w w w . 9 1 1 m i s s i n g l i n k s . c o m
karllegaladvice 1 month ago
@TheLagunaSunrise Yes, that is a point where he is wrong. But don't disregard all of his theory. After all, the planes where not commercial airlines as the official story states. They were grey military grade. There are several high definition videos of them crashing into the towers So chill...
karllegaladvice 1 month ago
@karllegaladvice Can you prove they were "grey military grade"?
I'm not American, so please stop babbling on about nothing. :-)
TheLagunaSunrise 1 month ago
@karllegaladvice there were no planes.
anthonyc31 1 month ago
Comment removed
AnaZella87 1 month ago
MUSLIMS SHED MORE TEARS ON 9/11 THAN ANY OTHER PEOPLE.
karllegaladvice 2 months ago
@karllegaladvice everyone on this planet got screwed that day ... even the assholes that actually perpetrated the deception -- they're just too stupid to realize it.
anthonyc31 2 months ago 2
@anthonyc31
THEY are suffering from chronic radiation...
Massaricossudo 2 months ago
this is the most brilliant 9/11 video I have ever seen, it explains all the anomalies of 9/11
optionsupdate 2 months ago 9
@optionsupdate good stuff .... many thanks for taking the time to watch.
anthonyc31 2 months ago
@optionsupdate The most thing id that his book is banned on Amazon, not like ALL OTHER BOOKS OF 9/11... this make me that this GOOD man tell the truth: see you his banned book on Amazon: The Third Truth
Inigo37 2 months ago
@Inigo37 this chaps analysis explains EVERYTHING about 911, all questions are answered, when the silverstien went ot collect money form insurance, I am surprised the insurers did not say "you did not need to topple building 7"
optionsupdate 2 months ago
@optionsupdate Not everything, I have several years of intense investigation on 9/11, Dimitri is wrong in several areas: the towers was full plenty of explosives (as secundary force and to begin the collapse), the planes was real (totally sure on this, Dimitri is wrong), the thicknes of the wall colums is not as Dimitry says, wrong another one: at the first plane the thicknes of the colums was less than 1/2 inch, at the second crash level, the thicknes was 1inch.
Inigo37 1 month ago
@Inigo37 hi thanks for the reply, did you watch the entire video?
optionsupdate 1 month ago
@optionsupdate I have seen ALL videos on 9/11, I have three years of investigation on 9/11, I have spoken with a teacher of pilots here in spain that investigate 9/11 in USA, and was teacher of pilots during 9/11 in USA: Mitoa Edjan Campos: see his videos on youtube and vimeo (in spanish) amazing man. I have thousands and thousands of articles and books of 9/11, is one of my several "hobbys" in my free time.
Sorry for my level english, is a bit low
Inigo37 1 month ago
@Inigo37 thanks, you must have deep knowledge of 911, who do you believe was behind the attacks.
Gracias, usted debe tener conocimientos profundos de 911, ¿en quién creer que estaba detrás de los ataques
optionsupdate 1 month ago
@optionsupdate USA goberment, easy to see: put full plenty of explosives in the towers and press the red button of the nuclear charges and the planes operation, no doubt. Mossad of Israel aswell, free-masons. Laura Knigth tell to us that on 9/11 Israel betray to USA for the first time in history.
Inigo37 1 month ago
@Inigo37 not for the first time in history. 911missinglinks. c o m
karllegaladvice 1 month ago
@optionsupdate See aswel Dr. Jody Wood. The morning at 9/11 there was a hurricane Erin on acean atlantic, if you search the trace of this hurricane you will see that in the hours of the collapse of the towers the hurricane go back in oposite direction: coincidence?: I don´t believe. If you search ALL the rest of hurricanes, severall (the less) moving erratic but in the bottom position, not in the north levels. The final debris of the collapse is a joke aswell: only 3%: its absurd.
Inigo37 1 month ago
the towers contained asbestos and also documents related to the financial scandals with mortgages. The buildings had to be demolished because of lawsuits regarding asbestos related sicknesses
optionsupdate 2 months ago
@optionsupdate yes, i found many reports of Asbestos in the towers. Unfortunately so many "researchers" jumped the gun are buying the BS lies that the "fine mist" contained Asbestos, which in turn made the Rescue Workers sick. This is a myth. The radiation from the 3 nuclear blasts made the Rescue Workers sick, not the Asbestos. The Asbestos was turned to dust, along with the concrete and steel. It was no longer "Asbestos" per se, but rather dustified Asbestos.
anthonyc31 2 months ago
this is the truth if you are not convince you are part of the fucking new world order nothing can turn steel and humans and ac units into dust in 10 seconds idiots
144000V 2 months ago 2
@144000V watching videos now that show the massive dust created is surreal. Don't forget all the rare radiation-related sicknesses that the 9/11 Rescue Workers are dying from. Radiation = Nuclear.
See here: tinyurl (dot) com / 432w33o
anthonyc31 2 months ago
The media probably not...............I'm not so convinced now
keflar5 2 months ago
It all makes sense to me now at the very same time that it sounds utterly rediculous, this is why people go crazy
keflar5 2 months ago
You Tube wants to take the YOU out.
God Bless You and Thank You Every One That made this Possible.
I now see why the song was call "Party 1999"
Plus
Every Movie Produced in the 1970s.
Bitches.
lazyfreedom98 2 months ago
this is by far one of the best explanations given for how and why the twin towers fell. How can steel skyscrapers create so much dust falling. This is a great explanation and i will certainly spread the word. Sadly his site does not exist no more and from comments under mine you can see that someone claims he is missing. Someone wanted him to shut up. Either way from his explanations we should find out that there is a super huge hole in ground zero.
mwowner1 2 months ago
What is this show called? Where does it air?
KongKegso2 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@KongKegso2 it's not a show ... it was documentary interview about Dimitri's 9/11 book, that is impossible to obtain. TPTB do not like the information that Dimitri shared ... and he's been missing for months.
anthonyc31 2 months ago
i have a question: if the government puts nuclear missiles into the planes and sends one into the pentagon, they clearly know about the risk to nuke entire washington and new york and therefor this must be their goal. then all of a sudden they feel they need to demolish the WTC in order to prevent the missiles from exploding in the top of the building - if they don't want that WHY THE HELL DID THEY PUT THEM INTO THE PLANES IN THE FIRST PLACE??? doesn't make sense to me!! please explain me!
waugse 3 months ago
@waugse sorry, but i have absolutely no idea what you're basing your comments on. Nothing you have stated is remotely close to what Dimitri explained in this 2 part documentary.
anthonyc31 2 months ago
@anthonyc31 sorry, i thought it is the general opinion/knowledge that the government is behind the attacks. maybe i got mixed up between all the information i looked up in the last couple days.
waugse 2 months ago
@waugse
There were no planes on 911.... only the one that was shot down in Shanks-ville....
Massaricossudo 2 months ago
Anybody care to explain the fact that theres video of fire fighters in the lobby of the T.C. when it came down on them, and they survived and didn't fall into a radioactive pit and die.
sabbath178 3 months ago
@sabbath178 i'll give you the chance to actually provide links to these videos before i delete your post.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
@anthonyc31 So i guess you can't answer the question of how the lobby stayed at ground level when by according to the video it should have fell into a radioactive hole, but surviving firemen that were in the lobby at the time with video says different, but go ahead and delete my post anyways.
sabbath178 3 months ago
@sabbath178 Yoiu can guess whatever you want. There were multiple physical events going on post detonation, as can be seen in numerous videos. That includes, dustification of the buildings by way of the crushed zone, and the process of watching the undamaged top section of both towers fall down through this dust. This is explained in the first 10 minutes of part 2. As for your claims of firefighters, that's just your baseless comments unless you can show proof.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
@anthonyc31 Since I can't post the link of the video, I'll give your viewers the title to type in and watch for themselves. just type, inside the world trade center while callapse. It cleary shows the building fell down around them and the lobby stayed at ground level. No firefighters died from a nuclear explosion, nobody got vaporized or fell into a Radioactive pit.
sabbath178 3 months ago
@sabbath178 send them to me privately using Send Message on my channel.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
@sabbath178
Yeah.... bush is a hero.... LOL!
Massaricossudo 2 months ago
Anyone else finding this slightly scary/daunting...?
It's like the real actions of 9/11 are being revealed and that the media/government could actually hold off this information for this long? D:
argh...i don't know how they do this...It's the day to day American's that still have no knowledge of this D;;;
XSoulswiperX 3 months ago
I TOTALLY believe in Dimitry, but the towers was FULL PLENTY of explosives aswell. Anyone try to buy his book? try to buy in Amazon. The book is out of print.
I have several books of 9/1, one of this is the Laura Knight´s book of 9/11, which I can get only in pilulerouge. But the book of the Dimitry is imposible to get, because they write the truth.
Inigo37 3 months ago
@Inigo37 I don't have his book but personally, i don't need it to be convinced ... i watched his presentation and did my own research to verify his claims. I posted some of my findings in a blog post (link is in the video description) that supports Dimitri's claims. At this point, I don't have many questions left about 9/11 -- i feel very satisfied that i know what happened. I wish more people would watch this video, but that's beyond my control. People are waking up slowly.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
@anthonyc31 The most incledible and absurd story is the thruth, this is why the most people can´t wake up, the more great lie, the more easy to believe, simply than this. Dimitry have wrong in several small areas: the second plane was real, i am totally sure on this, and the towers was full plenty of explosives, totally sure aswell.
His book is imposible to get, why? simply: because he tell us the thuth!!! I am happy to set / speak with intelligent people like you, sadly not like the rest .
Inigo37 3 months ago
@Inigo37 Its funny how Dimitri's website 9-11thology forum has been taken down or has he ran out of bandwidth like it says !!
trouzercoff 3 months ago
@trouzercoff
Dimitri has not been heard from since April 2011.
Let us pray he is alive and well!
CHarlesUlyssesFeney 3 months ago
@anthonyc31 You can see in youtube the old videos of 50´ of undergound nuclear explosions, and the numbers is ok with the Dimitry says to us: the numbers of kt with the numbers of richter scale is ok. And you can see the videos of 15-20cm of concrete pulverized on NY on 9/11, explosive can´t do that. The diferent aproach of the second plane its due to the diferents positions (and lens) of the cameras nothing more, i am ottally sure that was a second plane. The first plane was a smal plane.
Inigo37 3 months ago
@Inigo37 No planes hit the WTC. Absolutely none. See my "9/11 - No planes" playlist and visit by blog. It was explosives that detonated at the top of the WTC towers to simulate plane crashes. ALL video footage showing planes has been proven to be fake. Most of we saw on TV was fake (fake planes hitting WTC, fake witnesses, etc.) The only thing real was watching the buildings be demolished to dust. That was the only thing real. 9/11 was a mega deception -- the biggest lie ever.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
@anthonyc31 While I did think that theory was bizarre and ridiculous for a long time, I'm now starting to believe that there were zero planes involved in 9/11. It is pretty standard to know these days that all the media footage was in fact TV fakery. The question I have is who and how did they generate the sound of a plane flying at a low altitude before the buildings exploded upon "impact?" You can clearly see flashes going off before the CGI planes hit on TV. Was sound prerecorded and used?
Sambuca6178 3 months ago
@Sambuca6178 I know. I went through the same process when i first watched Dimitri's interview. I was like "no planes??? this is total BS". I paused watching the interview and spent several days (full time) looking into the no planes angle. the NOSE OUT video sold me. I realized that Dimitri was telling the truth and continued watching. Not only does his explanation unravel the plane confusion, he goes one step further to show that it doesn't matter, planes or no planes, it was a controlled demo.
anthonyc31 3 months ago 2
@anthonyc31 I have several years of INTENSE investigation on 9/11, I know a pilot teacher that was direct investigation on the data of the black box of the "plane" that hit the Pentagon. The most amazing to me of 9/11 is the most simple: how they to prevent ANY QUALITY or near video of the second plane when hit the tower? for me 9/11 is nothing, all the things that you see in the hollywood films when you eat popcorns allready exist, at least I think so.
Inigo37 3 months ago
@Inigo37
yes, the planes were actually BOMBS.... mini-nukes...
Massaricossudo 3 months ago
@Massaricossudo You can see clearly the sound of a big explosión just the second plane hit the tower, for me, this sound is clearly the sound of explosives, not a plane crash in to a building, listen:
Youtube: 9-11 WTC Attacks Original Sound. Steve Vigilante
Inigo37 3 months ago
keep your eyes on patronas towers
dhudson369 4 months ago
Most people don't even want to look at this theory.
They think of it as being a rediculaus idea, because they associate a 'Nuclear Demolition' with the typical nuclear explosion we're all so familiair with; big shokwave huge light/radiation.
Also they have a false interpetation of what this shock wave is like exactly.
If only people could shut up and listen.
The kind of explosion as described by Mr Khalezov could perhaps be a real possibility, watch the vid..
youtube.com/watch?v=Cu0F6RgQ0i8
Tautoulogic 4 months ago in playlist Favorieten van Tautoulogic
@Tautoulogic To be clear, the 9/11 events other than the WTC towers collapsing are his theory, but the explanation of how the 3 WTC towers collapsed. are Dimitri's actual testimony, not theory. This is why Dimitri Khalezov's explanation of the 9/11 events are the most powerful and believable. Skeptics and shills will constantly claim "this witness said this" or "this witness said that" to try and prove 9/11 theories wrong ... well this witness, Dimitri Khalezov, says it was a nuclear demolition.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
Comment removed
Tautoulogic 4 months ago in playlist Favorieten van Tautoulogic
I'm staying open to all this, I still think Judy Wood's stuff explains more thought the video of the towers coming down like a concrete waterfall looks more like a nuke explosion. Problem is, how did the nuke not destroy all the other buildings around, and only brought down the towers? How did it go straight up into the towers and not spread out and take out the asphalt streets above in one big circle? How did they place the nuke that deep --- digging in a major city and no one noticed?
jerichomutant 4 months ago
@jerichomutant I watched Judy Woods explain 9/11. She did a good job of showcasing that the WTC buildings came down to dust, but was about it. She provided a flimsy and half baked explanation as to how the buildings actually turned to dust. Visit my blog and see 2 posts about Judy Woods
Blog: ac31 (dot) blogspot (dot) com
Article 1: Dimitri Khalezov reply to Judy Wood supporter
Article 2: Review: Judy Wood "New Hiroshima" WRT Dimitri Khalezov "9/11: Third Truth"
anthonyc31 4 months ago
@jerichomutant These are my main questions too. It's just not coming across scientifically to me. Why would the towers turned into the "crushed zone?" He doesn't explain this well at all. I can understand the pulverization occurring underground because of the tight rock causing so much resistance, but how would the the building and human beings be all pulverized when there isn't any resistance really? What is causing the pulverization of the towers? This is not convincing me now.
organboi 3 months ago
@organboi Dimitri explains this very clear in a 20 minute section. I'm not sure how much more clearly it needs to be explained. The WTC is anchored to the ground. All tremors and vibrations that occur at or near the base of the tower's foundation will relay up the tower (75% up), much like an electrical current. Following this logic, anything and everything touching the building, floors ,etc. will be affected. The nuclear detonation is causing a massive shock wave to run up the tower.
anthonyc31 3 months ago
The problem is, the photos after 9/11 show that the bathtub is intact, so how does this happen .......?
jerichomutant 4 months ago
@jerichomutant Actually, the WTC bathtub was in fact damaged. Visit my blog: ac31 (dot) blogspot (dot) com and read the post called "Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov's 9/11 Testimony". In it, i list links to evidence that supports the testimony and claims made by Dimitri organized in various categories. See the "Damage to the WTC "Bathtub"" section for a few links.
anthonyc31 4 months ago
the video is called
the missile that hit wtc 2 in slow motion.
it does not look like a 757. on one video you can hear an eyewitness saying 'it was a missile with wings'
on other videos a cgi plane is superimposed over the missile which explains what looks like a bulge on the fuselage.
voodoowichdoctor 4 months ago
am i crazy, or does this video look like it has been edited? it looks EXTREMELY choppy at many points - also looks like some video footage has been repeated with different audio. the video quality is conveniently low enough that you cant match speech to their mouths. seems kinda fishy that every time he pulls a document the entire screen gets covered as if it were trying to hide things and take away your attention from the people. i don't know, but this might be fake.
vanillacokejunky 5 months ago
@vanillacokejunky Not fake. Read the description, you will see that yes, i edited this video from the original 26-part video. However, no alteration to Dimitri or the interviewer's comments were made.
Edits include:
- combined original 26 part video into 2 parts
- sped up video by 20%
- increased volume
- changed background music
- chopped off bumper music
- Added 10 min. of support material
- Removed FBI section
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@vanillacokejunky ... also note that most of the sections that repeat were in the original interview. This is more noticeable in Part 2.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
oke i found it. It`s on September Clues Epilogue at 04.18 - an italian TV Report showed an interview with a police men who noticed the clocks on the walls stoppet at 8:45 am.
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
I have seen an interview where a firemen said - all the clocks where standing still at the same time - but i`ve seen so many videos i can`t find it so i cannot post it :(
But at 0:58:12 Dimitri is talking about Electro-magnetic Pulse..which can destroy electronic and electric around.
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
Don't mean to nit-pick, but "Flight 11 struck the Pentagon" and "Flight 77 struck the North Tower"? A verbal typo i suppose.
ManAgainstCrime 5 months ago
@ManAgainstCrime it should be alleged AA F77 hit the Pentagon and alleged AA F11 hit WTC 1 (North Tower). Where do you see that listed incorrectly? I will try to correct if possible. Also, i think you'll find Part 2 very interesting (~40 minutes into Part 2, i think) where the TV news completely mixes up the flights and then re-organize them in subsequent clips.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@ManAgainstCrime I don't mean to nit-pick either, but flight 11 and flight 77 did not strike anything.
ACCORDING TO AMERICAN AIRLINES RECORDS NEITHER FLIGHT TOOK OFF ON 9/11
voodoowichdoctor 4 months ago
@voodoowichdoctor "I don't mean to nit-pick either, but flight 11 and flight 77 did not strike anything. ACCORDING TO AMERICAN AIRLINES RECORDS NEITHER FLIGHT TOOK OFF ON 9/11"
I was quoting the interviewer and pointing out his minor error. No biggie, but debunkers look for shit like that, as you know. Again, the interviewer said that "flight 11 struck the Pentagon" and flight 77 struck the North tower". It was, of course, the other way around (in the official narrative). Never mind.
ManAgainstCrime 4 months ago
@voodoowichdoctor voodoo, please put your thinking around missles (or planes) on hold ... and consider the evidence presented by Dimitri in this video, along with the evidence under: "Real planes did not hit the WTC - Planes were CGI digital fakes" ... tinyurl (dot) com / 432w33o
anthonyc31 4 months ago
@ManAgainstCrime watch this video
=KpEct4q4z9o&feature=channel_video_title
voodoowichdoctor 4 months ago
@voodoowichdoctor That link doesn't work. What is it about? What is the title (i'll search using the title).
ManAgainstCrime 4 months ago
note the fire ball from the underground explosion at 1:21:41 bursting through the smoke
stelley08 5 months ago
@stelley08 yup ... i believe that multiple conventional explosions detonated at the top floors (where the "plane" supposedly hit) ... this may be where thermite was used.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 yes perhaps. This is a great video thanx for uploading. this should be reported on all major news channels
stelley08 5 months ago
@stelley08 thanks and please share with your friends ... i have a blog that features a few articles that provide additional support for Dimitri's claims (Rescue workers suffering from rare radiation-related cancers and illnesses, damage to WTC bathtub, etc.) Visit: ac31 (dot) blogspot (dot) com
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 i have suscribed to your channel and have seen the blogs, all very interesting. Up until yesterday i had no knowledge of nuclear demolition and certainly didn't even consider that as an option to bring down the towers. do you think that this video will ever be played or aired on all major tv networks?
stelley08 5 months ago
@stelley08 Anything is possible, however, i think it would be very unlikely to see this information on TV because the people that planned and executed 9/11 are still alive and essentially control main stream media. They will prevent this information from getting out broadly. The controlled demolition of the WTC towers is just one issue ... "no Muslim hijackers" and "no planes" has huge implications and directly affects the fake war on terrorism and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31
Yes, 911 was indeed a show of horrors.....and while we are here rehearsing it.... millions of people are being terrorized because of it..... A moment of silence for the people in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan that are being terrorized by the 911 terrorists.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago in playlist 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Dimitri Khalezov 12
@Massaricossudo God Bless you my fellow traveler.
lazyfreedom98 2 months ago
Allright it got through,anyway,they cant stop the truth!It always comes on the surface,this way or other...Period!
galimir 5 months ago
OK if this gets through,I think these bustards are cenzoring us...I lost a long response yesterday and all kind of weird stuff,exactly like when I was developing some activity in relation with other bone-revealing video with the CIA wistleblower Chip Tatum..
galimir 5 months ago
@galimir yes, that's a great analogy. Chip Tatum is also fantastic. I have a CIA playlist for him
anthonyc31 5 months ago
Thank you Dimitri Khalezov for explaining 911!
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
Sounds very believable theory,even though an unexpected angle and facts...Sound even more believable than Judy Woods theory about Hutchison effect destruction of the towers...and even more believable than the nano-thermite theory...Time will show I guess.
galimir 5 months ago
@galimir Nicely put, thanks for taking time to watch. Note that Dimitri provides testimony (not theory) about the WTC demolitions being nuclear. He makes it clear that he is offering his opinion about the other events of 9/11. I've reviewed a lot of 9/11 information and theories ... 1) Thermite was a reasonable first guess, 2) Judy Wood makes good observations about dust but fails to provide a solid explanation as to the cause. In the end, Dimitri's explanation is the most detailed and logical.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@galimir
Do you actually know what a theory is? Dimitri Khalezov's is no theory.... He is an eyewitnesses of what took place on 911.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@deadlymayonnaise look whether or not there was a plane, the manner in which the towers fell was NOT as result of jet fuel burning at the top floor. end of story. did you actually watch this video?
shariotoflove 5 months ago
@shariotoflove don't waste your time with mayonaise boy, he's full of crap. He's just trying to instigate people and has no intention to discuss facts.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
The amount of trolls spreading blatant disinformation especially on this video is unreal. Bullshit arguments that are intended to go nowhere, only waste your time. You appear to have a nose for sniffing them out anthony, just delete their comments immediately and dont even give them the time of day.
Seanyboyh 5 months ago
@Seanyboyh thanks for your comment ... i agree, the trolls definitely come out in droves to try and fight Dimitri's explanation. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt so i let them post but you're right, i should just start fighting fire with fire and just delete BS posts.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@Seanyboyh
Yes... pancakes, and termite explains it all... LMAO!
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
Could only watch to the point where he couldnt provide credentials and took out the pictures of him posing in a military uniform like the Swedish serial killer who shot children... People like to pretend... And like War of the Worlds? Feed peoples imaginations with overwheling mis-information.
shawzie1916 5 months ago
@shawzie1916 i like to focus on what people say, not what they wear. After watching his 4 hour interview (many times over) and watching/listening to his other interviews (Fetzer & Barret), I find Dimitri to be very credible and his explanation becomes only more clear with each additional interview. Dimitri has provided deep insight and has addressed more unanswered questions about 9/11 than anyone. So, focus on his uniform's authenticity all you want - but you're doing yourself a big disservice.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 Believe me when I say while arrested by the police, if you stick to your story they will believe you eventually. But I can go to the costume shop and purchase a soviet uniform if I wanted and take pictures in the local photobooth. You have an obsession where when you look for something long enough you disregard information that support the contrary. If a nuclear warhead was fractured, all of manhatton would have been destroyed. A bullet is large enough to fracture a warhead.
shawzie1916 5 months ago
@shawzie1916 ...i believe nothing you say, and you should believe nothing i say. Use your brains and research this yourself. Read this carefully .... I am patient with people that ask questions or that post valid comments (e.g. spire) ... however you are doing neither. That means you're here to disrupt and i have zero patience for you. If you post one more BS comment, i will block you. Start making sense fast or find something else to do.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@shawzie1916 Correct!
NafffRespect 5 months ago
@MrShaz00 Have you actually watched the videos or are you just posting baseless comments? So far, it seems like you have not watched the videos so your opinion is utterly useless. I suggest, you watch the videos and then comment / ask questions. Otherwise i will delete all your comments and block you. Very simply. You don't watch the video, you don't get to comment.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
I'm reading a few of your comments I have a few questions for you guys please I'm not trying to be a smart ass here but while watching this Dimitri Khalezov telling us what really happen his claim that 3 150 megaton nuclear bomb destroyed both WTC North, South and building 7 tuning most of them into dust so he claims But who can verify his story does any body know a nuclear physicist? Did building 7 really became a building of dust prior to the collapse? Is there any avoidance of that?
MrShaz00 5 months ago
@MrShaz00 Yes, there is clear evidence that it had turned to dust before it came down. Watch Part 2.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
whos the guy doing the interview? I would like to see more of interviews'
eduardoobregon 5 months ago
@eduardoobregon I don't know. I've tried to find out, but in one post that i found, Dimitri made it clear that the guy was not interested in getting into the lime light so his identity was not shared.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 wow, well he seems like an exellent interviewer, did he just appear out of no where? I though he was at least somehow known.
eduardoobregon 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 wow, well he seems like an exellent interviewer, did he just appear out of no where? I though he was at least somehow known.
eduardoobregon 5 months ago
US officials detonated 3 underground nuclear devices that took down WTC 1,2 and 7. Apparently, the officials were duped into doing this by "intelligence" lies claiming that Osama Bin Laden planted 2 nukes at the top of the WTC (where the "planes" hit, i.e. explosions went off). The undetonated nuclear missile that hit the Pentagon added credibility (explains Pentagon "no plane" coverup). US officials panicked and took down the towers to save millions in NYC. Hence the massive ongoing coverup.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
US officials detonated 3 underground nuclear devices that took down WTC 1,2 and 7. Apparently, the officials were duped into doing this by "intelligence" lies claiming that Osama Bin Laden planted 2 nukes at the top of the WTC (where the "planes" hit, i.e. explosions went off). The undetonated nuclear missile that hit the Pentagon added credibility (explains Pentagon "no plane" coverup). US officials panicked and took down the towers to save millions in NYC. Hence the massive ongoing coverup.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 If Osama bin Laden got his hands on a nuke, the US intelligence agencies would have known the minute he got it... No country admitted to losing a nuke which would be mainstream news in 24 hours because of the seriousness of the situation... Radiation levels in NYC ground zero are only slightly higher than usual due to Radioactive Radon gas from burning fossil fuels. In my home I have a radon raditation filter to stop this after I got my home heating serviced.
shawzie1916 5 months ago
@shawzie1916 "Osama planted suitcase nukes in the WTC" was the BIG lie told to US officials and politicians. Osama is a strawman .. he never had nukes and had nothing to do with 9/11. Officials were duped into destroying the towers to prevent "suitcase nukes" from detonating in the atmosphere. US officials, thinking they had to save NY, detonated all 3 built-in underground nuclear devices at WTC 1,2 and 7. This is why the massive coverup ... they did it themselves.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@shawzie1916 As for radiation, that is one of the biggest pieces of evidence that nuclear detonations actually went off at Ground Zero. You realize that the very name Ground Zero means "The point on the earth's surface directly above or below an exploding nuclear bomb." Unusually high number of 9/11 Rescue Workers are now dying from rare radiation-related sicknesses and cancers. The evidence is overwhelming.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 Radon radiation which is not emitted from a Thermonuclear explosion...Ok. Ground Zero could also be another term used to describe a place of total destruction, the epicenter of the chaos below which is the point where damage is at its greatest. Workers are dying due to exposure to gases and toxens released due to an entire building filled with things while burned are toxic to breath.
Im all for 9/11 truth, but seriously...
shawzie1916 5 months ago