Added: 2 years ago
From: projectbasho
Views: 7,110
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That's amaze me, I doing prints using contemporary technology, but on the end of that my printing machine using UV as well !!. Really nothing to changed....

  • A lot of time and expense on a poorly rendered image. Come on guys be a little more creative. The depiction of the process is fine but the image is terrible. Why did you waste so much time and effort.

  • @peterpulido1

    Because its interesting to use different techniques to just using film.

    And this image isnt poorly rendered, it looks amazing. And if you don't like poorly rendered photographs, i would look at Edward Steichen, who currently holds the record (i think?) for photograph sold, $4.6m, and looks by your standards as crap.

  • It may appear "poorly rendered" to you because we've become so used to the high contrast images of straight photography -- deep blacks and bright whites. The pictorialists kept tonal values in the middle, and avoided the extremes. It's just a different way of rendering an image.

  • This is an excellent video, clearly showing the process. It could be improved by English subtitles explaining what materials are being used. There is not much information available about collotypes. Any addition would be appreciated.

    Again, good show!

  • Very interesting.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more