Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That is a great idea.

  • I think i'll stay with my Carver TFM-55x and my Carver CT-27v. i don't want any distortion.

  • that like defeats the whole purpose of powerful recievers

  • the problem i see is the wireless amplifyer is the output wattage see i have a 640 watt subwoffer in my basement this fucker if BIG and there is no way to connect this transmitter to my 100 watt AMP. and whats the point of trying to use this the amplifyer is like what? MAX 40 Watts? and thats probobley pushing it i see NO auxzillary outputs on the reciver! so when i try to connect my subwoffer in fucked 640 watts on 40 watts? yeah add an extra 600 watts RMS and il buy this

  • @kuza261 agreed. I like my subs at 1,500 watts.

  • nice job

  • The device might be good for simple rooms but I wouldnt skip on feeding my JBL anything less than they need. My bedroom doesnt have anything currently running but when I go to bed I go to bed and dream of JBL! LOL I listen to plenty enough in the living room. But wouldnt mind a two stereo channels only JBL in the bedroom.

  • I dream of JBL...sounds like you have a script for a new hit TV show.

  • What about interference from emergency radio frequencies or CB radio? Or has JBL sussed that out so no radio transmitter interference will be received. Or what about mobile phone interference as they tend to put out a strange signal that I have heard first hand. Kinder like short pulse tapping sound that lasts for a few seconds then goes away.

  • I have had no issues with inteference in dozens of installations using JBL's wireless devices. Subs and the on air 2.4g. Just finished up an install at a firemans home and we had an amp and a sub in use with no issues with his communication devices.

  • Cable cost at reasonable cost that is average £2.00 or around $4.00 dollars VS the wireless device cost to amplifier the speakers?

    Id say wire cable cost will be light-years cheaper. Okay the cable needs to wired around the room in neat and tiredly fashion can take while.

    These devices are neat for channelling elsewhere in the home.

  • You are correct about other rooms and that is where wireless pays. when you consider the average consumer is not sure of themselves when it comes to running wires in the home, this takes out the fear, enables a DIY installation, and no installer to hire. Around here installers are getting upwards of 100.00 an hour for retrofit work on labor alone. $4.00 for speaker wire is way low when you consider the length and gauge required for runs over 25'

  • how much does it costs that guy

  • here in the US the kit is about $380.00

  • What about wattage... this system seems good but limited on wattage depending on Ohms and Continuous power needed.

  • The amp is really robust, I know of a few people running JBL ES80 ans 90s off this amp in secondary rooms

  • Exactly i dont see how you can transmit amps from a powerfull amplifier wirelessly

    the reciver of that transmitter must have an amp built in it to work and i cant see that been as powerfull as the main amp

    you might aswell power it with an ipod

  • as long as you have a pre -amp out (tape monitor out will work too) or can connect to speaker wire inputs yes.

  • fantastic...i need 2 units..

    AH but will it work with my

    vintage scott integrated amp..?

    Steve In Canada

  • Cool video the wireless technology rocks I sent you an invite!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more