@lunaticist ...be careful with your words. Mechanistic Philosophy--in Alan Turing's Words--was murdered off with Newton....not Quantum Mechanics. When we talk about mechanistic we are really talking about Descartes' mechanistic world. Newton killed the Mechanistic world by explaining and predicting physical phenomena by the use of "forces"---an abstraction--an end to common sense in theoretical physics. Forces like gravity kill the conceptual basis for Descartes' mechanistic gear-like universe.
Newton had a mechanistic view of the world, where everything could be predicted i.e, You throw an apple, it falls down...A train travels from A to B in T amount of time ...etc..etc...Quantum physics threw all of that out of the window.
@DancingET ... depends what you mean by "mechanistic." Many people do not believe what you just said. Newton actually destroyed the "mechanistic philosophy"---(Alan Turing came up with this concept, and it was furthered by Noam Chomsky). Newton was the first theorist to postulate "forces."
@DancingET These forces go against common sense mechanistic philosophy (as with Descartes) where all physical behavior is understood as a "gear-like mechanism." With Newtonian mechanics, we can understand physical behavior through "abstract objects."
@DancingET ... I understand what you are saying. But I wouldn't call that "mechanistic." I would call that a prediction resisting on the concept of "locality." Quantum physics threw away the concept of locality most of all. It's important to understand how Newton changed the way we do physics--that is, he paved the way for "abstract" forces. Before Newton, this notion didn't exist in physics (Cartesian physics).
"Quantum Brain" great book- BUT -buddy - father of modern computer. Alan Turing (and H. Flower) built "bombe" at Blechley Park in Essex (U.K.) in 1940+ to break "enigma" code - the first computer.
Re the conundrum of homosexuality -there is a biological basis to the (few ) hermaphrodites born -and evidently a 'historical line' of such a group in the Caribbean somewhere, while I agree with you re same sex marriages and parent hood being anathema.
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
Everything in life is posative and negative. how we live and think and believe makes our life source [posative or negative. What we believe is what will happen when we die. All paths lead to God. Quantum physics is the scientists path. Science spends so much time trying to understand why things happen the way they do. When all you have to do is know that it does. What if when trying to prove a theory, all along the sheer will of wanting it to work that way has made it that way?
some people they're ego to submit that God is the creator for everything. God created our brain , give us a power of consciousness to change what we wish. God actually loves us so much and yet some of us could not submit and believe that God does exist!.
well said riffmaster8686, finally someone with a brain is watching these videos on physics and not trying to relate them to their 'god' but is looking at it from a purely scientific point of view and yes maybe even a spiritual point of view but is not trying to always say that 'god' created everything
the matrix film is just a sign and 13th floor and the film tron all signs showing we are in the unreal, nothing is truly real in reality, and god of a game is not truly even a god
I thought science was suppose to keep an open mind? When science finnally climbs to the top of the mountain, he will see God sitting there all along! Not religion, but God. Is it so hard to believe that we came from one we are one and we will return to one? Or is it just hard headedness.
The universe came from 1 atom (or even 1 atomic particle) and inflated to what we have now. These are the particles that are so small that they litrally dont exsist until we conciously look for them. This brings on the idea that we all expanded from one conciousness.
What science is doing now it trying to find out why...
Eventually the inflation will deflate and we will return to one solid atomic particle.
i agree with you. The holy Koran said more or less like you as well. after all, we're all created by God and wil return to God as our final destination. Koran is not only for submitters (muslims) but a guide for all mankind.
Have been part of a psychic mycelium leading to an nuclear fruiting that I knew would happen, but was trying to prevent (1996 CE). I also heard many voices and was in more places than one. I was very connected to distant consciousness. A woman with a British accent said to me, "It's YOU again!" I've attached a series of drawings that were done at that time.
It strikes me that Einstein was quite right. THe popular conception of entanglement, for example, shows us that some scientists seem to want science to be a bit like voodoo.
While Dawkins mocks Christians for believing in ghosts and Randi smirks at homeopathy for believing water molecules have memory, we really should hope science will get its own house in order before acting so snooty. He who casts the first stone...
the trouble is, quantum mechanics doesn't say that there are things that cannot be explained in terms of prior causes. It merely shows us how short sighed we were to think we might ever have a complete model. The closer you look, the more detail you find, the closer you look etc When we get to "looking" at bits of light, the observation mingles awkwardly with its subject. Since we can no longer look in the normal sense, we seem to be stuck with theory and correlation of big data we can observe.
sorry but people respect results not intentions and that is why the western paradigm is so successful and until we reach the limitaions of that paradigm we will not and should not abondon it.
It is romantic to envision a time when we discard this type of philosophy but that time has not yet arrived and debating it is really on useful on an emotional level no one offers a solution that demonstrates the practical aplication a new paradigm.
Unless you are able to do that then what is the point.
wasted, this is inaccurate, einstein did not waste his time his thought experienets helped to further understanding this is not a wasteful endeavor just becuase he assumed a position of conflict of the original interperation.
This guy is a real a hole and needs to get off his high horse, it is common sense that mechinistic thinking produces results and it is poised to be even more prevalent, this is not a bad thing.
As I listen, I think of New Kind of Science - Wolfram. We are in denial of something that is occurring and we are a part of and totally unaware of - yet we are one more fiber of the cloth. (veil?)
I like how this guy talks.
TonyBtheEG 1 year ago
@TonyBtheEG So does Stanley.
daniel987878 3 months ago
overboat the flat world? :-)
ZenMoodi 1 year ago
Comment removed
HealPlanetEarth 1 year ago
@lunaticist ...be careful with your words. Mechanistic Philosophy--in Alan Turing's Words--was murdered off with Newton....not Quantum Mechanics. When we talk about mechanistic we are really talking about Descartes' mechanistic world. Newton killed the Mechanistic world by explaining and predicting physical phenomena by the use of "forces"---an abstraction--an end to common sense in theoretical physics. Forces like gravity kill the conceptual basis for Descartes' mechanistic gear-like universe.
NoLies86 1 year ago
@NoLies86,
Newton had a mechanistic view of the world, where everything could be predicted i.e, You throw an apple, it falls down...A train travels from A to B in T amount of time ...etc..etc...Quantum physics threw all of that out of the window.
DancingET 2 months ago
@DancingET ... depends what you mean by "mechanistic." Many people do not believe what you just said. Newton actually destroyed the "mechanistic philosophy"---(Alan Turing came up with this concept, and it was furthered by Noam Chomsky). Newton was the first theorist to postulate "forces."
NoLies86 1 month ago
@DancingET These forces go against common sense mechanistic philosophy (as with Descartes) where all physical behavior is understood as a "gear-like mechanism." With Newtonian mechanics, we can understand physical behavior through "abstract objects."
NoLies86 1 month ago
@DancingET ... I understand what you are saying. But I wouldn't call that "mechanistic." I would call that a prediction resisting on the concept of "locality." Quantum physics threw away the concept of locality most of all. It's important to understand how Newton changed the way we do physics--that is, he paved the way for "abstract" forces. Before Newton, this notion didn't exist in physics (Cartesian physics).
NoLies86 3 weeks ago
no wonder people need the medication with a view of reality like that.
cacaolover1 1 year ago
"Quantum Brain" great book- BUT -buddy - father of modern computer. Alan Turing (and H. Flower) built "bombe" at Blechley Park in Essex (U.K.) in 1940+ to break "enigma" code - the first computer.
Re the conundrum of homosexuality -there is a biological basis to the (few ) hermaphrodites born -and evidently a 'historical line' of such a group in the Caribbean somewhere, while I agree with you re same sex marriages and parent hood being anathema.
Diana
cuqrious 1 year ago
he didnt waste nothin quantum mechanics is incorrect.
AEVautomatic 2 years ago
not mystery, just not what we expect or what we've been told!
ilestparfect 2 years ago
well all i can say is that life along with the truth is one big surprise. lol
ilestparfect 2 years ago 2
yeah, massive mystery
KID433321 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
judomad84 3 years ago
Everything in life is posative and negative. how we live and think and believe makes our life source [posative or negative. What we believe is what will happen when we die. All paths lead to God. Quantum physics is the scientists path. Science spends so much time trying to understand why things happen the way they do. When all you have to do is know that it does. What if when trying to prove a theory, all along the sheer will of wanting it to work that way has made it that way?
juzkickin 3 years ago
some people they're ego to submit that God is the creator for everything. God created our brain , give us a power of consciousness to change what we wish. God actually loves us so much and yet some of us could not submit and believe that God does exist!.
roxhana2 3 years ago
yeah submitting to leprechauns is just as plausible..and effective
riffMaster8686 3 years ago
well said riffmaster8686, finally someone with a brain is watching these videos on physics and not trying to relate them to their 'god' but is looking at it from a purely scientific point of view and yes maybe even a spiritual point of view but is not trying to always say that 'god' created everything
spacecadet0713 2 years ago
Reality is the fantasy
Reality is the game simuation world
reality is not the real world
we are just all living a lie in a program
the matrix film is just a sign and 13th floor and the film tron all signs showing we are in the unreal, nothing is truly real in reality, and god of a game is not truly even a god
RealityGameWorld 2 years ago
@RealityGameWorld Absolutely no proof of that whatsoever why would you bother believeing that?. I could just say, we are all living a lie.
Reality is fantasy
A devil made a fake world and gave us a fake mind
We are just living in his fake world.
Me saying this is just a sign of its truth!!!
A0Candle0In0The0Dark 9 months ago
I thought science was suppose to keep an open mind? When science finnally climbs to the top of the mountain, he will see God sitting there all along! Not religion, but God. Is it so hard to believe that we came from one we are one and we will return to one? Or is it just hard headedness.
juzkickin 3 years ago
The universe came from 1 atom (or even 1 atomic particle) and inflated to what we have now. These are the particles that are so small that they litrally dont exsist until we conciously look for them. This brings on the idea that we all expanded from one conciousness.
What science is doing now it trying to find out why...
Eventually the inflation will deflate and we will return to one solid atomic particle.
ClinTrojan 3 years ago
i agree with you. The holy Koran said more or less like you as well. after all, we're all created by God and wil return to God as our final destination. Koran is not only for submitters (muslims) but a guide for all mankind.
roxhana2 3 years ago
Have been part of a psychic mycelium leading to an nuclear fruiting that I knew would happen, but was trying to prevent (1996 CE). I also heard many voices and was in more places than one. I was very connected to distant consciousness. A woman with a British accent said to me, "It's YOU again!" I've attached a series of drawings that were done at that time.
baconwafer 3 years ago
It strikes me that Einstein was quite right. THe popular conception of entanglement, for example, shows us that some scientists seem to want science to be a bit like voodoo.
While Dawkins mocks Christians for believing in ghosts and Randi smirks at homeopathy for believing water molecules have memory, we really should hope science will get its own house in order before acting so snooty. He who casts the first stone...
Crapulency 3 years ago
the trouble is, quantum mechanics doesn't say that there are things that cannot be explained in terms of prior causes. It merely shows us how short sighed we were to think we might ever have a complete model. The closer you look, the more detail you find, the closer you look etc When we get to "looking" at bits of light, the observation mingles awkwardly with its subject. Since we can no longer look in the normal sense, we seem to be stuck with theory and correlation of big data we can observe.
Crapulency 3 years ago
sorry but people respect results not intentions and that is why the western paradigm is so successful and until we reach the limitaions of that paradigm we will not and should not abondon it.
It is romantic to envision a time when we discard this type of philosophy but that time has not yet arrived and debating it is really on useful on an emotional level no one offers a solution that demonstrates the practical aplication a new paradigm.
Unless you are able to do that then what is the point.
mtheoryrules 3 years ago
wasted, this is inaccurate, einstein did not waste his time his thought experienets helped to further understanding this is not a wasteful endeavor just becuase he assumed a position of conflict of the original interperation.
This guy is a real a hole and needs to get off his high horse, it is common sense that mechinistic thinking produces results and it is poised to be even more prevalent, this is not a bad thing.
mtheoryrules 3 years ago
As I listen, I think of New Kind of Science - Wolfram. We are in denial of something that is occurring and we are a part of and totally unaware of - yet we are one more fiber of the cloth. (veil?)
itzjezme 4 years ago