The weather IS changing, dramatically in some areas, more subtly in others. Animal and bird migration routes are changing and diminishing. All drama aside, something's going on.
Lawilson200- seems I find you everywhere calling names about a guy who has very respectable credentials. Judging by your attitude you do not know what you are saying. The point you are making does not matter. It is not like we have one of every species frozen in this way. Only a one is needed to make a strong case for the theory. Even without any there is plenty of other evidence.
I never denied there were frozon mammoths, found in areas where permafrost predominate. The conditions for their preservation is not that much different then "Ice Man," who was found in the Itallian Alps, embedded in a glacier and dated to be about 5,500 years old. Considering that mammoths went extinct about 7,000 years ago, there is no surprise here.
Lawlison-It is not the fact that a mammoth was found that is important. It is the position he was in (standing up and trying to climb up hill). There was still tropical plant life in his mouth and stomach (he was found way to far north for tropical plants). His erected male anotomy proves that he died of suffocation and the water in his lungs was dirty water. He was frozen and suffocated so quickly that he did not even fall down.
lawlison- You can do it or not, thats your choice. There are lots of articles the first one I saw was what I think you are asking for. Your the geologist do a little research before you come to a conclusion.
The weather IS changing, dramatically in some areas, more subtly in others. Animal and bird migration routes are changing and diminishing. All drama aside, something's going on.
buzzclick500 7 months ago
Awsome video keep spreading the Truth
coolvideo28 1 year ago
Great video :)... don't know why people like to call people names just because they have a different view.
ThisJustAwsome1 4 years ago
So, if mammoths were "froozen" by "dirty ice" during the "flood," why don't we have any "frozen" dinosaurs? Dr. Brown is an idiot.
lawilson200 4 years ago
Lawilson200- seems I find you everywhere calling names about a guy who has very respectable credentials. Judging by your attitude you do not know what you are saying. The point you are making does not matter. It is not like we have one of every species frozen in this way. Only a one is needed to make a strong case for the theory. Even without any there is plenty of other evidence.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
Bored are we? You seem to be popping up at strings that are six months and more.
And Brown is still an idiot and your "case" is non-existent.
lawilson200 4 years ago
Lawlison-Your wrong the mammoth is in a museum and there have been many other such cases found near both poles.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
I never denied there were frozon mammoths, found in areas where permafrost predominate. The conditions for their preservation is not that much different then "Ice Man," who was found in the Itallian Alps, embedded in a glacier and dated to be about 5,500 years old. Considering that mammoths went extinct about 7,000 years ago, there is no surprise here.
lawilson200 4 years ago
Lawlison-It is not the fact that a mammoth was found that is important. It is the position he was in (standing up and trying to climb up hill). There was still tropical plant life in his mouth and stomach (he was found way to far north for tropical plants). His erected male anotomy proves that he died of suffocation and the water in his lungs was dirty water. He was frozen and suffocated so quickly that he did not even fall down.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
Do you care to cite me a source, preferably a peer reviewed source.
lawilson200 4 years ago
Lawlison-Just google Benkendorf Mammoth
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
I said, PEER REVIEWED source. This means an academically recognized journal.
lawilson200 4 years ago
lawlison- You can do it or not, thats your choice. There are lots of articles the first one I saw was what I think you are asking for.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
Who then? Oard? It's been my experience that Oard is as wrong with geology as he was when he was a weatherman.
lawilson200 4 years ago
lawlison- I honestly did not look to see who did the reviewing. I'm quite sure you are capable of research.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
Sorry, but I typically do not waste much time YEC nonsense.
lawilson200 4 years ago
I don't know what YEC means
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
Don't make me waste letters. Young-earth creationists.
lawilson200 4 years ago
Lawlison- sorry.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
lawlison- You can do it or not, thats your choice. There are lots of articles the first one I saw was what I think you are asking for. Your the geologist do a little research before you come to a conclusion.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
This is very interesting. Thank you for sharing this insight with people on the internet.
johnny102marvin 4 years ago