Added: 4 years ago
From: dfrbolton
Views: 4,235
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 271 on a mustang dyno is really good. most mach's in my area i have seen dyno between 270-276 on a dyno jet. so ur numbers will be a lot higher than most

  • Machs were slightly underrated

    My mod list is quite a bit but ill name the majors stg 2 clutch, 12lb flywheel, alum driveshaft,4.30s, mild suspension mods, Lts, egr delete, 65mm throlltlebody, fully ported upper and lower intake,c&l intake sct tune, dyno tuned@320rwhp before several of those mods im sure there is more in forgetting but thats about the most of it

  • So is this bone stock? Thats actually not bad.

  • My 03 Mach N/a made 320Rwhp 340RWTQ

  • yea its too bad you dont have a vid of that,much less a pic or any vids of the mach 1.

  • Those numbers are easily attainable with bolt-ons, now where's the video proof?

  • What kind of parts do you have that made that much?

  • cool. I made a mach 1 clone with a gt convertible and wanted to see if it was close to a real mach 1 on power. Mine put down 306 rwhp on a blown 2v. It should give a real mach a run for its money after seeing the stock dyno run.

  • well now your not talking stock vs stock. but a stock mach has 305 hp. but if you put an exhaust and whipple supercharger on a mach you can put down over 450rwhp. probably similat amount of money you put down to get 306

  • oh i know this to be true but i didn't care to make that much power. I really just wanted a convertible mach and they don't make em so I made my own. I figured it would be cheaper to make a convertible gt look like a mach and make the engine comparible than it would be to buy a mach and make a convertible out of it. That would've been EXPENSIVE. So i'm content with my project.

  • The mach 1s are underrated on power bitch

  • not by much dude and why do you try and act so tough on youtube. i don't get it grow up its youtube your never gunna kick someones ass over you tube. and mach 1s were underrated slightly. people say 305 because that was the factory rating everyone acts like its 100 hp too low its like 5-10 hp MAX.its not like a 426 Hemi where it really produces 75 more hp than stated

  • Chassis dynomometers typically hold stock 2003 and 2004 cars at 275-285 rwhp [1] and 295-305 rwtrq (SAE). With a drivetrain loss of 15% this equates to 323335 hp and 345360 lbf·ft (465490 N·m) of torque.

    SUCK IT BITCH

  • Considering you think you know shit but yet you have nothing that states you have experience or that you even have a muscle car. so get some proof up and then well talk because it sounds like your 13.

  • What am I wrong about bitch?

  • wow well i dont want to make you mad calling me a bitch and shit makes me afraid. Alright, now The highest Mach 1 dyno sheet that i saw for rear wheel horsepower was 271 rwhp. who knows maybe a bit more but 15 % of that would equate to 305 to 310 hp at the Flywheel or BHP. thats exactly what the Factory said it was maybe 310 or 315 tops but dude because i stated that the factory sets the hp at 305 you automatically said i was wrong. well idk if you did the math but it doesn't equal up.

  • The Mach 1 can do 0-60 in 4.7 seconds, so around 330Hp seems right DOUCHEBAG

  • Wow congratulations dude but it can also run 13.2 in 1/4 mile dude idk if you know the reason low power cars seem fast is all in the gearing. its 305 mr.mustangmike if you love mustangs so much why dont you trust ford.

  • READ THAT BITCH Chassis dynomometers typically hold stock 2003 and 2004 cars at 275-285 rwhp [1] and 295-305 rwtrq (SAE). With a drivetrain loss of 15% this equates to 323335 hp and 345360 lbf·ft (465490 N·m) of torque.

  • wow dude grow up. you sound like a little kid who keeps saying shit and thinks if he keeps saying it and people listen to it hes right. get out of here stop wasting my time. if you love mustangs so much stop arguing with me over 15-20 hp. go fucking suck a dick you stupid fucking cunt. and while your at it get the fucking sand out of your pussy faggot.

  • The quick 0-60 time is more due to the gearing of the Mach (3.37 1st gear ratio/3.55 ring & pinion out back). 1/4 Mile trap speed vs. weight is a better way to estimate horsepower output.

  • Yah MustangMikeca is pure CHUMP after his WIFE fists his ass, he comes on youtube to try and feel like a big man. He will always be a FAT little Bitch.

  • 2000 z28 131000 miles 316 hp dyno jet

    stock with a few bolt ons

  • if it has a few bolt ons, it aint stock.

  • hey, I just dynoed mine about a week ago, put down 268whp and 291 wtq, pretty close.

  • hey, I just dynoed mine about a week ago, put down 268whp and 291ft. lb. of torque, pretty close.

  • what did it put down?

  • All Stock made 271 HP and 286 Ft-Lb to the wheels.

    On a Mustang 1100SE Chassis Dyno with Eddy Current

  • 271whp on a mustang dyno

  • thats really good

  • The difference can also be due to humidity and or temp variations...fyi...;)

    -M

    myspace dot com/stalerecords

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more