271 on a mustang dyno is really good. most mach's in my area i have seen dyno between 270-276 on a dyno jet. so ur numbers will be a lot higher than most
My mod list is quite a bit but ill name the majors stg 2 clutch, 12lb flywheel, alum driveshaft,4.30s, mild suspension mods, Lts, egr delete, 65mm throlltlebody, fully ported upper and lower intake,c&l intake sct tune, dyno tuned@320rwhp before several of those mods im sure there is more in forgetting but thats about the most of it
cool. I made a mach 1 clone with a gt convertible and wanted to see if it was close to a real mach 1 on power. Mine put down 306 rwhp on a blown 2v. It should give a real mach a run for its money after seeing the stock dyno run.
well now your not talking stock vs stock. but a stock mach has 305 hp. but if you put an exhaust and whipple supercharger on a mach you can put down over 450rwhp. probably similat amount of money you put down to get 306
oh i know this to be true but i didn't care to make that much power. I really just wanted a convertible mach and they don't make em so I made my own. I figured it would be cheaper to make a convertible gt look like a mach and make the engine comparible than it would be to buy a mach and make a convertible out of it. That would've been EXPENSIVE. So i'm content with my project.
not by much dude and why do you try and act so tough on youtube. i don't get it grow up its youtube your never gunna kick someones ass over you tube. and mach 1s were underrated slightly. people say 305 because that was the factory rating everyone acts like its 100 hp too low its like 5-10 hp MAX.its not like a 426 Hemi where it really produces 75 more hp than stated
Chassis dynomometers typically hold stock 2003 and 2004 cars at 275-285 rwhp [1] and 295-305 rwtrq (SAE). With a drivetrain loss of 15% this equates to 323335 hp and 345360 lbf·ft (465490 N·m) of torque.
Considering you think you know shit but yet you have nothing that states you have experience or that you even have a muscle car. so get some proof up and then well talk because it sounds like your 13.
wow well i dont want to make you mad calling me a bitch and shit makes me afraid. Alright, now The highest Mach 1 dyno sheet that i saw for rear wheel horsepower was 271 rwhp. who knows maybe a bit more but 15 % of that would equate to 305 to 310 hp at the Flywheel or BHP. thats exactly what the Factory said it was maybe 310 or 315 tops but dude because i stated that the factory sets the hp at 305 you automatically said i was wrong. well idk if you did the math but it doesn't equal up.
Wow congratulations dude but it can also run 13.2 in 1/4 mile dude idk if you know the reason low power cars seem fast is all in the gearing. its 305 mr.mustangmike if you love mustangs so much why dont you trust ford.
READ THAT BITCH Chassis dynomometers typically hold stock 2003 and 2004 cars at 275-285 rwhp [1] and 295-305 rwtrq (SAE). With a drivetrain loss of 15% this equates to 323335 hp and 345360 lbf·ft (465490 N·m) of torque.
wow dude grow up. you sound like a little kid who keeps saying shit and thinks if he keeps saying it and people listen to it hes right. get out of here stop wasting my time. if you love mustangs so much stop arguing with me over 15-20 hp. go fucking suck a dick you stupid fucking cunt. and while your at it get the fucking sand out of your pussy faggot.
The quick 0-60 time is more due to the gearing of the Mach (3.37 1st gear ratio/3.55 ring & pinion out back). 1/4 Mile trap speed vs. weight is a better way to estimate horsepower output.
Yah MustangMikeca is pure CHUMP after his WIFE fists his ass, he comes on youtube to try and feel like a big man. He will always be a FAT little Bitch.
271 on a mustang dyno is really good. most mach's in my area i have seen dyno between 270-276 on a dyno jet. so ur numbers will be a lot higher than most
rahu8670 1 year ago
Machs were slightly underrated
My mod list is quite a bit but ill name the majors stg 2 clutch, 12lb flywheel, alum driveshaft,4.30s, mild suspension mods, Lts, egr delete, 65mm throlltlebody, fully ported upper and lower intake,c&l intake sct tune, dyno tuned@320rwhp before several of those mods im sure there is more in forgetting but thats about the most of it
1badmach103 1 year ago
So is this bone stock? Thats actually not bad.
Specialized1993 1 year ago
My 03 Mach N/a made 320Rwhp 340RWTQ
1badmach103 2 years ago
yea its too bad you dont have a vid of that,much less a pic or any vids of the mach 1.
wellshii 2 years ago
Those numbers are easily attainable with bolt-ons, now where's the video proof?
blown06tc 2 years ago
What kind of parts do you have that made that much?
Specialized1993 1 year ago
cool. I made a mach 1 clone with a gt convertible and wanted to see if it was close to a real mach 1 on power. Mine put down 306 rwhp on a blown 2v. It should give a real mach a run for its money after seeing the stock dyno run.
huntergluck 3 years ago
well now your not talking stock vs stock. but a stock mach has 305 hp. but if you put an exhaust and whipple supercharger on a mach you can put down over 450rwhp. probably similat amount of money you put down to get 306
ljdgm 3 years ago
oh i know this to be true but i didn't care to make that much power. I really just wanted a convertible mach and they don't make em so I made my own. I figured it would be cheaper to make a convertible gt look like a mach and make the engine comparible than it would be to buy a mach and make a convertible out of it. That would've been EXPENSIVE. So i'm content with my project.
huntergluck 3 years ago
The mach 1s are underrated on power bitch
mustangmikeca 2 years ago
not by much dude and why do you try and act so tough on youtube. i don't get it grow up its youtube your never gunna kick someones ass over you tube. and mach 1s were underrated slightly. people say 305 because that was the factory rating everyone acts like its 100 hp too low its like 5-10 hp MAX.its not like a 426 Hemi where it really produces 75 more hp than stated
ljdgm 2 years ago
Chassis dynomometers typically hold stock 2003 and 2004 cars at 275-285 rwhp [1] and 295-305 rwtrq (SAE). With a drivetrain loss of 15% this equates to 323335 hp and 345360 lbf·ft (465490 N·m) of torque.
SUCK IT BITCH
mustangmikeca 2 years ago
Considering you think you know shit but yet you have nothing that states you have experience or that you even have a muscle car. so get some proof up and then well talk because it sounds like your 13.
ljdgm 2 years ago
What am I wrong about bitch?
mustangmikeca 2 years ago
wow well i dont want to make you mad calling me a bitch and shit makes me afraid. Alright, now The highest Mach 1 dyno sheet that i saw for rear wheel horsepower was 271 rwhp. who knows maybe a bit more but 15 % of that would equate to 305 to 310 hp at the Flywheel or BHP. thats exactly what the Factory said it was maybe 310 or 315 tops but dude because i stated that the factory sets the hp at 305 you automatically said i was wrong. well idk if you did the math but it doesn't equal up.
ljdgm 2 years ago
The Mach 1 can do 0-60 in 4.7 seconds, so around 330Hp seems right DOUCHEBAG
mustangmikeca 2 years ago
Wow congratulations dude but it can also run 13.2 in 1/4 mile dude idk if you know the reason low power cars seem fast is all in the gearing. its 305 mr.mustangmike if you love mustangs so much why dont you trust ford.
ljdgm 2 years ago
READ THAT BITCH Chassis dynomometers typically hold stock 2003 and 2004 cars at 275-285 rwhp [1] and 295-305 rwtrq (SAE). With a drivetrain loss of 15% this equates to 323335 hp and 345360 lbf·ft (465490 N·m) of torque.
mustangmikeca 2 years ago
wow dude grow up. you sound like a little kid who keeps saying shit and thinks if he keeps saying it and people listen to it hes right. get out of here stop wasting my time. if you love mustangs so much stop arguing with me over 15-20 hp. go fucking suck a dick you stupid fucking cunt. and while your at it get the fucking sand out of your pussy faggot.
ljdgm 2 years ago
The quick 0-60 time is more due to the gearing of the Mach (3.37 1st gear ratio/3.55 ring & pinion out back). 1/4 Mile trap speed vs. weight is a better way to estimate horsepower output.
TEAMLSX 2 years ago
Yah MustangMikeca is pure CHUMP after his WIFE fists his ass, he comes on youtube to try and feel like a big man. He will always be a FAT little Bitch.
HillWilliam420 2 years ago
2000 z28 131000 miles 316 hp dyno jet
stock with a few bolt ons
tx77015ls1 3 years ago
if it has a few bolt ons, it aint stock.
blown06tc 2 years ago
hey, I just dynoed mine about a week ago, put down 268whp and 291 wtq, pretty close.
blown06tc 4 years ago
hey, I just dynoed mine about a week ago, put down 268whp and 291ft. lb. of torque, pretty close.
blown06tc 4 years ago
what did it put down?
blown06tc 4 years ago
All Stock made 271 HP and 286 Ft-Lb to the wheels.
On a Mustang 1100SE Chassis Dyno with Eddy Current
dfrbolton 4 years ago
271whp on a mustang dyno
blown06tc 4 years ago
thats really good
blown06tc 4 years ago
The difference can also be due to humidity and or temp variations...fyi...;)
-M
myspace dot com/stalerecords
iammalloy 4 years ago