Added: 5 years ago
From: stealingamerica
Views: 4,086
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 2:28 and the reason? Because he DID win. What

    the HELL are these fools TALKING ABOUT??!!

    BUSH WON! I wish we had him back..

  • Pennsylvainia didnt went for Bush in 2004!

  • What are these jokers talking about? Where is the outrage in Pennsylvainia?  The same size state with the same vote margin but it went for Bush. Just shows you that this is for political purposes. Exit polls are bullshit and you can show just as many polls that went for Bush. The libs just pick the closest state (Ohio) they lost in by 140,000 ++ and hope they can get the most attention. Where is the ourtrage in Wisconsin ( which Kerry won by one half of 1% ?? Sore Losersssssssssss!!!!!!!!

  • A simple "google search"--TOM FEENEY CORRUPTED REPUBLICAN / ELECTION FRAUD--will reveal that Florida Tom Feeney is one of the most corrupted republican politician in the USA and he's now under an FBI investigation.

    In Nov 4, 2008 the good people of Florida will vote his corrupted ass out of office for good.

    OBAMA~BIDEN 08

  • Why they spam this coment. Poeple must no this.

    When I was register to vote there was 2 suits in there going thru a huge card file, lookin likr they was checkin again some list. They dont work there, I been in there before, only one lady registering and one anmswering phones.

    I thoughjt vote records is private.

  • So since the democrats won the congress in 2006, they must have cheated right?

    Funny how you liberal morons scream 'cheater' only when you lose.

    Your party is pathetic and you're going to lose again in 2008.

    Enjoy another 8 years of Republican rule. I know I will.

  • Your logic and reasoning sucks.

    Enjoy your 8 more years of Republican rule.

  • Judy Woodruff is a dedicated Liberal. She was anchoring the 2000 election, and when they called it for George Bush, she almost wept on camera. Pathetic.

  • you guys are all idiots thinking that bush himself stole the white house.. REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT they are all the same just with little differences... our elections are always set up because of the 2 party system.. republicans and democrats are in it together. dont fool yourself by thinking democrats are angels.. i told people that when democrats took over congress nothing would change... and it hasnt, they wnt the war just as much as republicans.. mark my words all poiticians are crooks

  • The election system is being gamed by the private election systems companies and the election officials. Money talks BS walks.

  • Thank you for getting the word out about how the present admin. is illegitimate. what will it take for people to say enough and to get more active ? we simply can't afford to have another pres. election stolen . get active people!

  • bush won despite the best efforts to get the vote out. the thing people miss is that conservatives turn out better than liberals. in 2000 only 51.3% of eligible voters turned out in 2004 only 55.3% turned out people need to get out and vote its only once every 4 years make the time it's important! if 100,000,000 people roughly = 55% then 90,000,000 people sat at home or forgot or for whatever reason didnt vote. I think if you dont vote you shouldnt get a taxe refund or somthing.

  • "I think if you dont vote you shouldnt get a taxe refund or somthing"

    Yes, the typical Liberal thinking. Penalize or tax those who don't do what you want them to do, or those who have the freedom of choice but choose something you don't agree with. Great! And it seems you're all for "getting out the vote" so long as most of those who vote are Liberals. Hypocrite.

  • --Dennis Kucinich took away his co-sponsorship of the Holt bill after it came out of Committee badly flawed.

    --Passing the present Holt Bill will validate secret vote counts and produce only "sales receipt" paper trails.

    --The only solution, the totally cost-free one, is to eliminate the touch-screen machines in their entirety.

    --Google: mark crispin miller holt-bill-is-poison for video.

  • --Dennis Kucinich took away his co-sponsorship of the Holt bill after it came out of Committee badly flawed.

    --Passing the present Holt Bill will validate secret vote counts and produce only "sales receipt" paper trails.

    --The only solution, the totally cost-free one, is to eliminate the touch-screen machines in their entirety.

    --Google: mark crispin miller holt-bill-is-poison for video.

  • No, Bush DIDN'T win, and you don't "get over" cheating your way into the White House (twice). This WILL be vindicated as the further investigations in OH as showing. You people who think this is "stupid", "dumb" etc. are thinking exactly the way the Emperor (with no clothes) wants you to think. Good little puppies. And wasn't it a [King] George who was messing with us a few hundred years ago, and look what happened in this country then? Think it can't happen again? Keep messing with us!

  • "No, Bush DIDN'T win, and you don't "get over" cheating your way into the White House (twice). This WILL be vindicated as the further investigations in OH as showing."

    Every official record shows Bush DID win, twice. And if not, when is this "vindication" going to happen? How long has it been?

  • this is dumb. Bush won. Get over it.

  • this is stupid, its like asking how did an underdog win in a sports match

  • What kind of doofus looks at all the NUMEROUS irregularities in the last two national elections and many local ones - ALL benifiting Republicans - and decides that there is nothing there, even worth INVESTIGATING. The reason there have not been investigations is becuase of what we would find if there were.

  • "Something happened...they were exactly flipped"

    YEAH...IT'S CALLED ELECTION RESULTS! Lame stuff here.

  • Did you ever think that maybe people lie on the exit polls? Or maybe there is a reason why we don't elect people using exit polls. Because they are not accurate.

  • First, you show your ignorance about exit polls. They have been proven to be very, very accurate & our US administration even supports them in elections in other countries, but not in their own country.

    Second, what motive would millions of voters have to lie to exit polls for the fist time in history in the entire world?

    Third, its been well proven that many types of vote fraud was used by the Republicans in 2000 & 2004.

  • "what motive would millions of voters have to lie to exit polls"

    --I would lie, because I don't agree with the practice of exit polling.

    "its been well proven that many types of vote fraud was used by the Republicans"

    --Like what? And if so, why did it receive the official approval of all govt entities involved?

    Just because you ask some people in some precincts how they voted doesn't mean everyone voted that way. What if the only people who agreed to participate were Liberals?

  • All of a sudden the exit polls stop working in those two elections? What a conicidence! Watch the FOX news clip of how easy it is to hack a Diebold machine. Not to mention the Secertaries of state(Job is to interpret and implement voting laws of that state) also being co-chairs on the Bush campaigns. Kenneth Blackwell(Ohio 2004), and Katherine Harris(Florida 2000) both held co-chairs on the Bush campaigns, as well as the jobs of over seeing election laws. Conflict of interest? NO NOT AT ALL. LOL

  • "All of a sudden the exit polls stop working in those two elections?"

    --1. Those were two of the closest elections we've ever had. There is a margin of error. 2. In those two elections, emotions were higher than normal. People act differently when their emotions are up.

    "Conflict of interest?"

    --Democrats do that, too. But for some reason there's no conflict of interest? Please. Just because a close election doesn't go your way doesn't mean there's election fraud. Typical Liberal belief.

  • Sorry- when exit polls are that far off it isn't due to "emotions".

    I'm sure there is other conflicts of interest for Democrats in other elections, but we are talking about the two states that basically decided the last two presidential elections. Please take my advice and watch that FOX news clip on Diebold machines, its here on You Tube. And no I'm not a sore loser, because if the votes aren't counted either(R or D) way then the people voice isn't being heard.

  • "but we are talking about the two states that basically decided the last two presidential elections"

    --Coincidence. What about the states where the highest state officials were Democrat operatives and the state's vote went for Democrat by a small margin? No hell-raising there, huh? It's a fact that Conservatives don't like cooperating with exit pollers, so most of those who did were not Bush voters. There's your margin of error. And if there was any tampering, why make it such a close win?

  • "Coincidence", they aren't stupid, If I was going to rig an election those are the two states that I would have chosen. "Democrats rigging elections" I'm pretty sure in Georgia the vote was rigged for the democrats and they are using electrical voting. "such a close win?" Like in Mexico in the 90's when the PRI won 49%-51% after the computers "went down" for three days they had some how won. You might get mad when you find the truth, but stealing elections is as old as election themselves.

  • "but stealing elections is as old as election themselves"

    --So is false accusations of stealing.

  • Deny to your hearts content, but if you really want the truth then look into it a little more. If my guy stole the election I wouldn't want to look into it much, but if I did and found out that he did steal the election then I wouldn't have a problem saying so. It isn't about partisan ship, it's about the integrity of the whole election process, wheather you're democrat or republican doesn't matter. If you don't see that they are both capable of these schenanegans then go ahead and look away.

  • "if you really want the truth then look into it a little more"

    --The AP looked into the 2000 election for me, and found that George Bush won the vote legit. Or weren't you aware?

    "If you don't see that they are both capable of these schenanegans"

    --All politicians are. Your claim is just as credible as my claim that the Democrats stole the 2006 elections. And I have just as much evidence to prove it as you do.

  • Hey I never said they didn't steal it, I thought we were talking about Bush's stolen elections. At any rate this is point less, and someday you'll be on the other side saying "hey this computer voting if a fraud", but the pathetic thing is it will take your boys losing for you to figure out what a fraud it is. Bamboo out.

  • "Hey I never said they didn't steal it"

    --Funny, though, that until I mention it, the subject never comes up.

    "someday you'll be on the other side"

    --Where did I ever write that I was in favor of, or endorsed, or claimed electronic voting was better than ballot voting? Please, show me. I love how Liberals make up things about Conservatives. They do it every day. I merely contend that the Bush campaign didn't "steal" any election. And if you're going to make the claim, you should show evidence

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more