Why pick at something you don't understand if you are learning nothing? Don't waste wisdom with fools, Don't take wooden nickels, and don't just lob stupid grenades into some ones dream.
@TheFiyahKing amazing isn't it! that the temp of the surface of the sun (also known as underlying photosphere) is so different from the centre of the sun (also know as the corona). science is awesome, same its not taught where you are from : (
I do not have much knowledge in chemistry or physics to debate. I saw another clip from BBC about the car running on the fuel you all are talking about. it is on flixxy.com and search for gm-hy-wire-concept-car.htm
Just one more thought: Yes, it is possible to get energy from the sun for electrolysis to happen, and then get the fuel. But if you get such needed high efficiencies from the sun, isn't it better to use this energy directly to run the car instead of having the additional process of electrolysis?
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodymics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
This IS possible!!! FUCK you critics!!! YOUR the ones holding the world back, if ye'r so smart then go create an alternative to challenge HHO like! Instead of hiding in your mom's loft spitting out your negative theory's and thinking of ways to put innovators down! Just because YOU'R not smart enough to come up with a better option!! Ha! Pricks. GO HHO!!! :-D
I don't think it's the government that's suppressing this tech...
don't think it's those greedy old buzzards in big oil either...
I'm pretty sure that it was that bastard James Maxwell and his crony Oliver Heaviside. Had he just come up with some different equations can you imagine the progress that we would have made by now? ;)
It's 2011 we should all be filling our cars up with water by now! but that darn government won't let that happen will they? or is it the oil companies? or BOTH! ;)
oh man, you guys are hilarious, learn a few things about making pri-mord-ial (pre-death-soup) and you think YOU made everything. science or satan cant make anything from nothing.(lets see tesla or science create a blade of grass from 'nothing') youre intitled to you opinion but i KNOW youre all in for such a horrific suprise...ill 'promise' not to laugh.
No car can run only on water as there is NO ENERGY in water. Converting the water to H2 and O2 requires the same energy as is released when recombined.
Any talk of suppression by oil companies is the talk of tin foil hat wearing loonies.
This is BIG OIL speaking, I guess you guys are on to us. Everyone that gave a thumbs up to this video will be paid off. you all will receive a $10,000,000 check if you agree to keep this water fuel thing quiet. and a lucky few will receive pet unicorn to keep quiet about 9/11 (we were responsible for that too). although to appease the left wing affirmative action quota , we will be allowing a Taco powered car on the market shortly, a salsa (mild) coolant will be required.
Build a prototype your self. That's the bottom line. Really get into and find out first hand. As to the 'law' of conservation of supposed 'energy' it's a badly flawed notion. 'Energy' is not a 'thing'. Rather MOTION and counter motion abound. So called 'matter' is standing waves of MOTION in opposition to STILLNESS. It can be unraveled. Atomic power DOES NOT require big money.
can anyone tell me what would happen to the world economy if OIL industry suddenly collapses ? (petrloeum-wise, not all other oil products). thanks...
@noodlesmealey you're an idiot... fossil fuel is made from ancient ferns and forest that were exposed to extreme heat and pressure to create what we call fossil fuels... evolution is the most likely theory on how life came to be on planet earth... i'd really like to hear your thoughts.. are you a creationist? if so you should just shoot yourself and remove youself from the smart man's gene pool
This car uses electricity to decompose water. It's inefficient and it takes a long time to charge the batteries to decompose water to its components. I think an electric motor is much more efficient...
Let's take a look at your schematics and see what you got and talk about efficiency... What's that you say? You don't have a plan? You only took one baby class and saw it on TV once?
@mana619 what the fuck is baby class? What the fuck do you mean by "saw it on TV once"?? Now let me ask you; what do you know?? How much have you researched?? Have this guy proven anything?? And why should I show you my schematics?? If I had a plan I would patent it first, not like this stupid guy introduce it to the fucking media. Now that you asked, well I will use nanocapacitors instead of battery in the car and use power chips to convert heat to electricity. Two options that may work better
this video was posted in 2006 and now it's 2011 and I'm just learning that gas is not needed to run a car.....SMH...oil companies are evil and this world is a set up!!
Don't believe everything you see. There's lots of deceiving stuff out here today, and don't believe all the conspiracy nuts either. Instead, study up on engineering (mechanical and electrical) to properly assess ideas like these. Lots of things appear good on the surface, but when you study them and figure out the ins and outs, you realize that it's a bad idea and won't work.
@RisingPhoenix120 Don't believe the conspiracy nuts when they say that the Japanese meltdown coincided
with two nuclear accidents in the U.S. Download SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS. the CIA handbook for depopulation. Almost everything the conspiracy nuts predicted has come to pass. ATF occupied an entire floor of Oklahoma City Federal Building yet no ATF were injured in the blast.
Yes, don't believe conspiracy nuts. Because there are generally a MULTITUDE of different conspiracy theories for each little thing, i.e. Japanese earthquake this year, JFK assassination, 9/11, chemtrails, etc. And even if one theory IS proven correct, there are still 99 others that are wrong.
But if it makes their lives feel more interesting, then let it be.
So what are the in's and the out's Mr. Chemical-Mechanical-Electrical Engineer? Oh, I see.. the negative is that the product is water? Oh, wait a minute, the negative is that it's cheap? I doubt you have ever "properly assessed" any idea that would change life as we know it. What a troll! "Study up on engineering", LOL! Oh yeah lets buy a book and a news clipping...
It's pretty obvious you don't even have the mental capacity to assess problems like these. You're probably more of a technician than an engineer if anything. I'll bet you buy into all the perpetual motion videos on YouTube as well.
I'm not saying it's impossible. You certain can run vehicles from H2. But you aren't going to get more energy out than you put into the system. This means you'll use electricity from elsewhere which can be just as bad as using gasoline to start with.
And you've seen it work, and have fully analyzed the engine to see that with your own two eyes? Generally when people make "big claims" such as this, it deserves heavy scrutiny. A guy from his basement making something that could revolutionize transportation, doing what engineers around the world could not do...
And no, it's not as easy as "stepping outside the box." It's a matter of engineering analysis which, from your above comment, you lack the ability to perform.
And yet our Government recently gave the auto industry till the year 2025 to have minimum of 50 MPG! By then still us fosil fuel it will not cost any less to travel, nor do our enviroment any good.Todays temperature July 12, 2025 will be record breaking.
This is idiotic -- more energy is used to split the water into hydrogen than comes back out when you burn that hydrogen. That energy comes from fossil fuels. They never mention that in the video -- which makes it somewhere between totally misleading and just plain false.
This is a waste of time. Hydrogen from water is a carrier of energy, not a source of energy. Water is not the fuel, the fuel is whatever's burning down at your local power plant. You need grid electricity (and lots of it) to perform the electrolysis. Then you have a problematic, explosive leaky gas burning in a 30% efficient combustion engine. It's a better use of electricity to charge a battery that drives an electric motor. The future is all electric my friends!
@proaudiohd wrong, hydrogen gas is combusted in the engine and is more explosive that gas. otherwords more energy. water itself doesn't go into the engine. the hydrogen does and it produces plenty of extra energy to power everything and keep the battery charge. i would put in a scientific problem for you but you wouldnt understand.
@zzytrewq ok ill let my professor know. oh and give me the correct equations and values then so i can give them to my professor and he can teach the rest of his students the "correct" way.
@proaudiohd oh and not to mention that almost 80% of power planst use some type of fossil fuel to generate electricity. the only reason gas prices are going up is because of politics but everybody knows that. some are just to ignorant to belive it.
Why is this technology taking so long to surface? Why are greedy corporate heads allowed to suppress it ? Inventors and normal guys not so technically inclined with no scientific schooling have experimented with using water as an energy base by breaking it down to its elements . This has been well documented , proven and displayed and applied for decades! Many alternative energy options out there but we rather punch holes in the earth. Hats off to those who successfully live off the grid!
we are using water to create electricity or to power a car, this means we do not need to burn fossel fuels, we do not need to pollute the environment any longer. nothing is impossible...
Where the FUCK is this car then?? Did Exxon devour this one too?
Do you get the feeling that your freedom of press is pure bullshit?? Designed to stupefy the masses? beat you into submission and make you stop questioning the authorities?
Excuse the bad English. It's Google's fault (-:
It's the same bullshit game everywhere , isn't it??
@oPickful I mean how the fuck could something burn steel red hot in seconds and not burn your skin at all? that is such crap! id hav to see in real life to believe that. Not on a screen where camera effects and horseshit is added.
@Ac1DGoD You're definately right, if it burns metal it's sure as hell going to burn our skin at least. Check out the video at 0.39. They're talking about the tip of the welder not being hot and not burning the human not the flame burning the person.
water no tax govtment will losssss billions of revenue because of water, the govt will make sure that this will not pass why because the govt will declare bunkcorruptcy
@philbot01 When used on a car, the fuel cell is powered by the car's battery, which is recharged by the alternator, therefore you don't need thousands of kilowatt hours, since this is a closed circuit. Check Stanley Meyers story. He crossed the US on a dune buggy in the eighties, using a more efficient fuel cell than this one, and exclusively water.
@machintruc313 Fucking herp derp. Go to uni, learn thermodynamics, and you will realise how stupid you were for thinking like that. Shit, go to school, do basic chemistry or physics and you will realise that you can not obtain energy from water, but only get energy from MAKING water. You're a fucking idiot, I'm sorry.
@philbot01 I don't only think and talk, I do. I'm using a fuel cell on my car, which I made and greatly improves my MPG. Maybe if I stuck a plastic bottle full of dihydrogen and oxygen filled and produced by my fuel cell (resulting from the electrolysis of H2O, not by making H2O) while you read your chemistry book and crack a match, that would give you a different perspective on reality and certainly teach you respect. Asshole.
@machintruc313 Im sorry, No matter how much you 'do', your ignorance will still prevent you from realising that there is no such thing as overunity, which is what everyone here thinks it is. Yes, you can run a car on hydrogen. yes, the hydrogen is made from electrolysing water. What you are saying is not even coherent. I can understand that you cannot comprehend a basic concept if you can't even use the language properly.
@fluxrez Wrong. Hydrogen is not energy, hydrogen is a chemical. It has a chemical potential energy that it is given through electrolysis. You can only get as much energy from burning H2 as you can get from making it. So overall, there is a net increase of zero calories (Or joules, or any other unit of energy)
Please understand things more before you start calling people trolls.
@philbot01 I completely agree it takes equal energy, but thats why you harvest the hydrogen with Sun power over a period of time. YES, its not efficient. YES, it's not really doable unless you have a setup that only someone who can afford a hydrogren collider could build... but thats the point. The tech needs to be developed further. He was a troll because of his 2 year old replies and ignoring what I was saying. Hydrogen is a combustable gas, just like gasoline. We need to harvest it.
So why isn't this more widely known about? Another factor is to be looked at the economics, caan this be adapted to power cars via direct electric motor driive or other? Hydrogen powered vehicles are touted as the only ones I've seen are a half million dollars and up.
Can one of these vehicles be afffordable for the middlee class? However dimminishing that class seems to be these days.
its funny how many people think that its so stupid to run with on board generation of hydrogen, yeah itd be alot smarter to drop in an electric motor. oh wait. what about all of the cars on the road that could use this system with little modification. i think this is the best thing to be used to settle some sort of transition from todays cars to tommorrows.
he is taking the credit of a lot inventors and researchers.. he refers to Microsoft coming out of the garage.. that is a good scenario as Microsoft stole its begins too.
@morrisburger1 The problem with the transition you describe is you're suggesting we use crackpot bullshit instead of actual science. You will get more miles out of the battery if you use it to drive an electric motor directly. Adding on-board hydrogen generation to the mix will REDUCE your miles per charge, not increase them.
@morrisburger1 The problem with the transition you describe is you're suggesting we use crackpot bullshit instead of actual science. Generating browning gas in the moving car is a waste of energy and will NOT get you further than using the battery to drive an electric motor directly. You will get more miles out fo the battery if you use it to drive an electric motor directly. Adding on-board hydrogen generation to the mix will REDUCE your miles per charge, not increase them.
Wind turbines performing electrolysis to fill hydrogen fuel cells or charge an electric battery overnight makes sense. Wasting the energy in that battery to perform electrolysis in the moving car results in a massive percentage of the available energy being wasted for the sake of saying the car runs on water.
Hydrogen is not a fuel source, it is a storage medium like a battery. On board electrolysis is no different that using one battery in the car to charge another.
@morrisburger1 On board electrolysis wastes energy that would be better used driving an electric motor. Performing electrolysis in a moving car is, from a thermodynamics and science point of view, incredibly stupid.
I am not arguing against electric cars or hydrogen fuel cell cars. My only point is that the person behind this video is exploiting your ignorance of science to promote garbage.
@morrisburger1 "No more arguments against the logic of not using fossil fuels? Good."
I never made any such arguments to begin with. It says a lot about your understanding of the science at hand that you feel the need to flat out lie about what I've written to try and make your point.
@morrisburger1 It would be far more efficient to run the car directly from the battery. Performing electrolysis on board and then burning the resulting gas is a MASSIVE waste of energy. The theoretical maximum energy recovery is only about 80% on each conversion. Electrolysis is one conversion and burning the gas is another. You've wasted at least 40% of the energy in the battery with a futile conversion.
@morrisburger1 "You can create as much gas as you like on board as long as you have the electricity and water to do so"
On board electrolysis is a MASSIVE waste of energy. Using the electricity to drive the engine directly, as in a Prius or similar hybrid, is far more efficient that wasting a massive amount of the available energy in futile electrolysis.
I mentioned perpetual motion because that's the kind of sci-fi fantasy this "invention" is selling.
@morrisburger1 "The other option? Keep doing it the way you're doing it, keep paying for petrol, keep killing for oil, keep making some rich bastards even richer. Way to go my friend, way to go."
That's a false dichotomy, we have more than the two options you outline, but as long as fools chase perpetual motion machines big oil will sit comfortably on top. We need to be researching viable energy sources, not throwing all our hope on cranks claiming to violate the laws of thermodynamics.
@morrisburger1 "it doesn't matter how much energy is used in creating the HHO"
You're wrong. You are advocating this nonsense because you are deciding to deliberately ignore the generation side of the equation. Performing electrolysis in the car will not power the car. If you want a hydrogen fuel cell car you need to be using hydrogen generated elsewhere. None of this frees us from fossil fuel.
@morrisburger1 Water powered cars are a common scam. It's a variation on perpetual motion machines. Iit take more energy to perform electrolysis than you can recover from burning the resulting gas.
There are some engines that use the heat in the cylinder to flash water to steam, essentially adding a stroke, but that temperature variation reduces overall combustion efficiency and increases wear and tear on the cylinder.
I love seeing the videos by these con artists. The claim that they can break the laws of Thermodynamics and yet are chasing pennies with car conversion kits! It's a riot.
Inventions are always rediscovered, just as mathematics is rediscovered. Someone always thinks they have discovered something. This has already been discovered and buried decades ago. Gas prices rise because it can. Its like this, let's say you need 100 dollars to run your business, but now people use less of your product. So you raise your prices and continue business as normal. So you created a car that runs off of water. Oh great, so let's use both water and gas???? But it works with water!
We are getting fucked big, by oil companies and by drug companies banning cannabis, a completely face drug that anyone can grow for almost no money at all.
And in spain they found that injecting thc(cannabis) in to brain cancer it will eliminate the cancer completely and leave every cell in your body perfectly fine.
If this is true, from now on, the wars will have to started under true reasons, like "building the third temple", not under excuses of oil, saving civilians or such.
As the reason for WW1 and WW2 was that someone gets his "promised land" as "God's promised people".
Saw this on FOX 5 years ago. The guy gets awarded contracts to develop the technology for Hummvee's and APC's, and not a peep comes out since. So, did the oil companies stifle it? Most likely, they paid him and the next 3 generations off quite handsomely.
This is a deceptive video..He is using hydrogen to supplement the gasoline..Made it sound like the car ran 100 miles on 4 oz of water alone..That engine would never run on hydrogen alone with that tiny hydrogen system he has...Producing a concentrated flame for a small torch is one thing..Generating enough horsepower to move a car is another.
And wouldn't you know gas prices just keep rising!! WHAT a surprise... It's very very clear and should be clear to every American that our politicians are stopping progression in the name of profit for the oil companies!! WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
I dont think eletrolysis is the process going on here. I think that vibration induced via electric current is the key. Again is pure speculation. On the other hand Tesla lighted a light bulb using the earth magnetic field and touching the ground. Look it up, it was buried and this was at the beggining of the past century. Trust me if we can clone a sheep and we are decoding the human genome map, we can find better ways of producing cheap clean energy.
@plairevenir You really should do some research on topics you discuss, before offering an ignorant opinion. At least you would be an educated ignoramus then.
@vartatoosh A scientist has no ego. A scientist knows the laws of science and physics can be unmade and remade in the blink of an eye. If you say it doesn't work show us some proof.
WOW if you know about electrochemistry and electrolysis, you should know about "cold fusion". This process has been hypothesized for at least 20 years. it has been hidden and all patents bought and never heard of again b/c now it is not the time to make it public. Oil companies’ don’t want this. Do your homework and find out about it because it is possible. I have a chemical engineering degree and a doctor in pharmacy degree.
since when did intellectuals interested in science become so sensitive? lol ssooooo FUNNY! IM SMARTER THAN YOU.......NO, I AM! NO YOU'RE NOT!... bbooo hoooo ya big babies. Lighten up! :)
I fail to understand the drama here. the alternator creates electricity, the electricity seperates the hho gas, the gas powers the engine. Isnt that basically how it works. you need to start the engine with a fossil fuel, i would imagine.The engine will not be able to keep up to the actual gas created assuming that there is a litre a minute,
as for the torch, great idea, and would love to have one.
@Namaste1001 "gets hidden under the guise of 'national security'."
Not true. Perpetual motion and free-energy machines are fiction. Con men have been exploiting the scientific illiteracy of Americans for a long, long time.
Hybrid will be the way to go with Electricity and Gasoline. Electric for short trips and gas oline kicks in when you need it for passing. Water is not customer friendly! Too many querks! The world had one of those. The vehicle had a boiler system running the PTO off steam pressure. Great for working trucks because it took a truck to carry it as it was big and bulky. Anything to do with water will freeze in colder climates unless you put an additive in it and guess what more expense.
the ones that say hydrogen doesn't work....are idiots...its been going on for the last 30 years or more. they wanted hydrogen fill stations way back in the 70's it was even on the news..... and another enerygy is zero-point energy. if you noticed japans magnetic hybrid motar bike...check out austrailias invention :P
This fucker stole Stan Meyers work and now trying to become Bill Gates maybe he also want to patent combustion engine ? What a greedy bastard. Stan Meyers idea should spread around the world for free as fast as it can because disaster is coming up. A lot of human beings will starve to death because of oil shortages
I'm no chemist but i do understand fully of how a car works. Also, we don't have an infinite supply of fossil fuels. Its time for us to start perfecting running our machine we need in live on an alternative, safe for our environment, fuel. If we in the automotive field can produce over 100,000 volts with 12v DC, by just collapsing a magnetic field (ignition coil). Why cant we produce enough energy to create the hydrogen fuel??? i know its possible! Oh yeah, this guy is fish food by the way...
the key is in the cycles of current per second through the fluid that causes the lowest voltage needs but regardless these cars really do run on water and the government is keeping a huge chunk of the worlds economy alive because billions could lose their jobs if water replaced oil in the energy market we think this is an evil action but the profits will be gone very soon and then the conversion will happen slowly give it another 25 years and they will allow it to come out in trickles.
This is not perpetual motion, it takes more energy to break up a stable substance into highly reactive components than said reaction releases. His "unique" electrolysis process" is not unique at all, there have been countless experiments and applications that involve electrolysis since the early 1900's. Hydrogen generated from this kind of machine has to be stored because it cannot be created fast enough for things like cars and torches.
ive always wanted to know what would happen if you used litter fluid in a car or a main fuel source in something that requires a gas heck im just speakin nonsesne
well i dont understand about this in detail but doesnt the engine produce electricity with the alternator? Well if it does then is almost a perfect cicle is almost the perfect machine if was no need to refill of water
The 'law of conservation of energy' does not apply if you are using HHO in combination with petrol to dramatically decrease petrol consumption. Petrol burns more efficiently with HHO in the mix. The setup is simple and can be done for $300-600.
An engine can be fueled solely by HHO, but it is not feasible due to the size of the cell needed, the complexity of electronics needed to optimize electrolysis output, spark timing compensation, and 'maybe' the 'law of conservation of energy' as well :P
Yes, he is using electrolysis to split H2O into Hydrogen and Oxygen. No big deal-junior high science. But he forgets to tell anyone how much electricity he is using to split the Hydrogen from the Oxygen. It takes more energy to split the water apart than you get beck recombining them.
Don't believe me, answer this: this is a 6 year old video. Why have we not heard from him again?
@cpovey1 some of the first cars ever where electric powered, then they mostly disappeared. we had reliable all electric cars on the streets 10 years ago and then they too disappeared. now very similar electric cars are back.
My point, It takes more than 6 years to get every one on board a concept like a car running on water electrolysis.The truth sucks.
@DOJIELDIENVE I have nothing against electric cars-fine idea, the only general problem is short range. But what is being discussed here is running a car on water. Water must be split (electrolysis) into H2 and O2 to burn or use in a fuel cell-no big deal. The problem is it takes more energy to split water into H2 and O2 than you get back, thus you have a net energy loss.
WOW1 Nice! to bad we will never see other then in this video, Specially if you got the goverment involved!!!!! If is sounds to good to be true, it usually is!!!!
What the... the upload is from 2006!! It's 2010, what's happened since? Is there any follow up? Surely, by now they must have figured out how this really works or if its a fraud.
Why pick at something you don't understand if you are learning nothing? Don't waste wisdom with fools, Don't take wooden nickels, and don't just lob stupid grenades into some ones dream.
artoftheflatlands 2 weeks ago
hotter than the surface of the sun, are you stupid
TheFiyahKing 1 month ago
@TheFiyahKing amazing isn't it! that the temp of the surface of the sun (also known as underlying photosphere) is so different from the centre of the sun (also know as the corona). science is awesome, same its not taught where you are from : (
korayek 6 days ago
:o ......sweet lowed owmihteh'
ThePeopleneedhelp 1 month ago
I do not have much knowledge in chemistry or physics to debate. I saw another clip from BBC about the car running on the fuel you all are talking about. it is on flixxy.com and search for gm-hy-wire-concept-car.htm
rajendrampremnath 2 months ago
Just one more thought: Yes, it is possible to get energy from the sun for electrolysis to happen, and then get the fuel. But if you get such needed high efficiencies from the sun, isn't it better to use this energy directly to run the car instead of having the additional process of electrolysis?
Piocha999 2 months ago
"Living in Pickering is Pointless" -- DayJobOrchesrtra
Stop fighting kids.
adracamas 3 months ago
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodymics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Thermospecialist 3 months ago
1996 Stan Mayer.
And yes Free-energy is real , cars running on water is real. Do corrupted governments just want to keep us in control.
LaOm33 4 months ago
This IS possible!!! FUCK you critics!!! YOUR the ones holding the world back, if ye'r so smart then go create an alternative to challenge HHO like! Instead of hiding in your mom's loft spitting out your negative theory's and thinking of ways to put innovators down! Just because YOU'R not smart enough to come up with a better option!! Ha! Pricks. GO HHO!!! :-D
MrGraham28 4 months ago
This is 2006 and its 2011 now!? Is that man dead or what?
Gigascodex 4 months ago
@Gigascodex No. The stupidity of his invention had him forgotten.
Rhinoch8 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can you help me get that please i believe in you 100 percent.plz email me
JosephBeltran48 4 months ago
can you help me get that please i believe in you 100 percent
JosephBeltran48 4 months ago
@reesespeices696
I don't think it's the government that's suppressing this tech...
don't think it's those greedy old buzzards in big oil either...
I'm pretty sure that it was that bastard James Maxwell and his crony Oliver Heaviside. Had he just come up with some different equations can you imagine the progress that we would have made by now? ;)
chucksmix3 4 months ago
This shit doesn't even taste good... I'm sure not gonna eat it.
chucksmix3 4 months ago
It's 2011 we should all be filling our cars up with water by now! but that darn government won't let that happen will they? or is it the oil companies? or BOTH! ;)
reesespeices696 4 months ago
oh man, you guys are hilarious, learn a few things about making pri-mord-ial (pre-death-soup) and you think YOU made everything. science or satan cant make anything from nothing.(lets see tesla or science create a blade of grass from 'nothing') youre intitled to you opinion but i KNOW youre all in for such a horrific suprise...ill 'promise' not to laugh.
noodlesmealey 4 months ago
There are two things that run on water:
1. Dolomedes sexpunctatus
2. Boats
No car can run only on water as there is NO ENERGY in water. Converting the water to H2 and O2 requires the same energy as is released when recombined.
Any talk of suppression by oil companies is the talk of tin foil hat wearing loonies.
zzytrewq 4 months ago
The Bush family w/ their oil companies don't like this I am sure...
DiScoHiPPiEChiCK 4 months ago
@DiScoHiPPiEChiCK - LOL. You slept through Physics 101 by the sound of it.
zzytrewq 4 months ago
This is BIG OIL speaking, I guess you guys are on to us. Everyone that gave a thumbs up to this video will be paid off. you all will receive a $10,000,000 check if you agree to keep this water fuel thing quiet. and a lucky few will receive pet unicorn to keep quiet about 9/11 (we were responsible for that too). although to appease the left wing affirmative action quota , we will be allowing a Taco powered car on the market shortly, a salsa (mild) coolant will be required.
jtjvjjm2010 5 months ago
Build a prototype your self. That's the bottom line. Really get into and find out first hand. As to the 'law' of conservation of supposed 'energy' it's a badly flawed notion. 'Energy' is not a 'thing'. Rather MOTION and counter motion abound. So called 'matter' is standing waves of MOTION in opposition to STILLNESS. It can be unraveled. Atomic power DOES NOT require big money.
tommymorey 5 months ago
the blood pays for the oil and that pays for the rich to party all day
Shiretb 5 months ago
@Shiretb Isn't that the way they designed the system. It's time for a change
a2zhandi 4 months ago
can anyone tell me what would happen to the world economy if OIL industry suddenly collapses ? (petrloeum-wise, not all other oil products). thanks...
yb1000 5 months ago
'fossil fuels' dont exist.. petrochemicals are NOT made from smushed fossils.
evolution is a crock... believe ANYTHING else but that. this idea is LONG overdue.
im upset.
noodlesmealey 5 months ago
@noodlesmealey you're an idiot... fossil fuel is made from ancient ferns and forest that were exposed to extreme heat and pressure to create what we call fossil fuels... evolution is the most likely theory on how life came to be on planet earth... i'd really like to hear your thoughts.. are you a creationist? if so you should just shoot yourself and remove youself from the smart man's gene pool
Xero555000 5 months ago
@Xero555000 sooooo Mr. Creationalist, how do you explain the 100 year world oil supply found in Canada's shale?
Keep in mind, this isn't crude oil. But sand saturated with oil.
a2zhandi 4 months ago
@a2zhandi are you retarded... did you read any of my post
Xero555000 4 months ago
@noodles-the_creationist-mealey - ah the words of someone bereft of truth and knowledge
zzytrewq 4 months ago
this is pure shit . . . don't eat this guys shit
weeeendog 5 months ago
This car uses electricity to decompose water. It's inefficient and it takes a long time to charge the batteries to decompose water to its components. I think an electric motor is much more efficient...
sinashsh 5 months ago
@sinashsh
Let's take a look at your schematics and see what you got and talk about efficiency... What's that you say? You don't have a plan? You only took one baby class and saw it on TV once?
mana619 5 months ago
@mana619 what the fuck is baby class? What the fuck do you mean by "saw it on TV once"?? Now let me ask you; what do you know?? How much have you researched?? Have this guy proven anything?? And why should I show you my schematics?? If I had a plan I would patent it first, not like this stupid guy introduce it to the fucking media. Now that you asked, well I will use nanocapacitors instead of battery in the car and use power chips to convert heat to electricity. Two options that may work better
sinashsh 5 months ago
this video was posted in 2006 and now it's 2011 and I'm just learning that gas is not needed to run a car.....SMH...oil companies are evil and this world is a set up!!
mxta15 5 months ago
@mxta15
Don't believe everything you see. There's lots of deceiving stuff out here today, and don't believe all the conspiracy nuts either. Instead, study up on engineering (mechanical and electrical) to properly assess ideas like these. Lots of things appear good on the surface, but when you study them and figure out the ins and outs, you realize that it's a bad idea and won't work.
RisingPhoenix120 5 months ago
@RisingPhoenix120 Don't believe the conspiracy nuts when they say that the Japanese meltdown coincided
with two nuclear accidents in the U.S. Download SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS. the CIA handbook for depopulation. Almost everything the conspiracy nuts predicted has come to pass. ATF occupied an entire floor of Oklahoma City Federal Building yet no ATF were injured in the blast.
freetubester 5 months ago
@freetubester
Yes, don't believe conspiracy nuts. Because there are generally a MULTITUDE of different conspiracy theories for each little thing, i.e. Japanese earthquake this year, JFK assassination, 9/11, chemtrails, etc. And even if one theory IS proven correct, there are still 99 others that are wrong.
But if it makes their lives feel more interesting, then let it be.
RisingPhoenix120 5 months ago
@RisingPhoenix120
So what are the in's and the out's Mr. Chemical-Mechanical-Electrical Engineer? Oh, I see.. the negative is that the product is water? Oh, wait a minute, the negative is that it's cheap? I doubt you have ever "properly assessed" any idea that would change life as we know it. What a troll! "Study up on engineering", LOL! Oh yeah lets buy a book and a news clipping...
mana619 5 months ago
@mana619
It's pretty obvious you don't even have the mental capacity to assess problems like these. You're probably more of a technician than an engineer if anything. I'll bet you buy into all the perpetual motion videos on YouTube as well.
I'm not saying it's impossible. You certain can run vehicles from H2. But you aren't going to get more energy out than you put into the system. This means you'll use electricity from elsewhere which can be just as bad as using gasoline to start with.
RisingPhoenix120 5 months ago
@RisingPhoenix120 it does work. You just have to step outside the box to see how it works.
Most don't even know they're in a box! Do you?
a2zhandi 4 months ago
@a2zhandi
And you've seen it work, and have fully analyzed the engine to see that with your own two eyes? Generally when people make "big claims" such as this, it deserves heavy scrutiny. A guy from his basement making something that could revolutionize transportation, doing what engineers around the world could not do...
And no, it's not as easy as "stepping outside the box." It's a matter of engineering analysis which, from your above comment, you lack the ability to perform.
RisingPhoenix120 4 months ago
@a2zhandi Awakening from a fake dream takes time.
LaOm33 4 months ago
@LaOm33 agreed
a2zhandi 4 months ago
And yet our Government recently gave the auto industry till the year 2025 to have minimum of 50 MPG! By then still us fosil fuel it will not cost any less to travel, nor do our enviroment any good.Todays temperature July 12, 2025 will be record breaking.
Intunecreations 5 months ago
This is idiotic -- more energy is used to split the water into hydrogen than comes back out when you burn that hydrogen. That energy comes from fossil fuels. They never mention that in the video -- which makes it somewhere between totally misleading and just plain false.
bluecoast1 5 months ago
@bluecoast1 guess you didnt see the scientific equation i wrote out. just scroll down.
killertctma 5 months ago
This is a waste of time. Hydrogen from water is a carrier of energy, not a source of energy. Water is not the fuel, the fuel is whatever's burning down at your local power plant. You need grid electricity (and lots of it) to perform the electrolysis. Then you have a problematic, explosive leaky gas burning in a 30% efficient combustion engine. It's a better use of electricity to charge a battery that drives an electric motor. The future is all electric my friends!
proaudiohd 6 months ago
@proaudiohd wrong, hydrogen gas is combusted in the engine and is more explosive that gas. otherwords more energy. water itself doesn't go into the engine. the hydrogen does and it produces plenty of extra energy to power everything and keep the battery charge. i would put in a scientific problem for you but you wouldnt understand.
killertctma 6 months ago
@killertctma - By all means, go ahead with your "scientific problem". I can't wait.
proaudiohd 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@proaudiohd 2 H2O(L) → 2 H2(g) + O2(g) requires an input of E = +1.229 V
Burning H2 and N2 (via combustion) releases 572kj of energy or 3.57014164e+24 volts.
So we have input 1.229v and combusted the gasses receiving 3.57014164e+24v and a few mols of H2O
Plenty left to spin an alternator and continue the process...
Now how do you ass whole say it?... oh ya SUCK IT! lol
killertctma 6 months ago
@killertctma - interesting equations and values. Pity the numbers aren't right.. Sucks to be lousy at physics when trying to make a point. LOL
zzytrewq 5 months ago
@zzytrewq ok ill let my professor know. oh and give me the correct equations and values then so i can give them to my professor and he can teach the rest of his students the "correct" way.
killertctma 5 months ago
@killertctma - check your inbox. I'll ignore your sarcasm.
zzytrewq 5 months ago
@proaudiohd oh and not to mention that almost 80% of power planst use some type of fossil fuel to generate electricity. the only reason gas prices are going up is because of politics but everybody knows that. some are just to ignorant to belive it.
killertctma 6 months ago
wow i wan' get in touch with thisguy if anyone knows how let me know
Tyree365 6 months ago
Profit will kill us all. Not every technology is intended for mass production. He could have offered this free and got business on the comeback.
NewBaldwin 6 months ago
Why is this technology taking so long to surface? Why are greedy corporate heads allowed to suppress it ? Inventors and normal guys not so technically inclined with no scientific schooling have experimented with using water as an energy base by breaking it down to its elements . This has been well documented , proven and displayed and applied for decades! Many alternative energy options out there but we rather punch holes in the earth. Hats off to those who successfully live off the grid!
MrBlkstamina 6 months ago
were can I it? but its all about money at the pump.
getreal1776 6 months ago
This is a scam -.- watch?v=Kv9vMzXJbho
ragingavion 6 months ago
we are using water to create electricity or to power a car, this means we do not need to burn fossel fuels, we do not need to pollute the environment any longer. nothing is impossible...
Sulekha1920 6 months ago
At the end: "lets hope water prices go up like gasoline" EPIC FORESHADOWING
CrimsonXdef 6 months ago
Greetings from Iran..
Where the FUCK is this car then?? Did Exxon devour this one too?
Do you get the feeling that your freedom of press is pure bullshit?? Designed to stupefy the masses? beat you into submission and make you stop questioning the authorities?
Excuse the bad English. It's Google's fault (-:
It's the same bullshit game everywhere , isn't it??
oPickful 7 months ago 12
@oPickful QUOTE: "It's the same bullshit game everywhere , isn't it??"
That it is.... But not for long. When my system is up and running, I want everybody to have one!
a2zhandi 4 months ago
@oPickful I mean how the fuck could something burn steel red hot in seconds and not burn your skin at all? that is such crap! id hav to see in real life to believe that. Not on a screen where camera effects and horseshit is added.
Ac1DGoD 2 months ago
@Ac1DGoD You're definately right, if it burns metal it's sure as hell going to burn our skin at least. Check out the video at 0.39. They're talking about the tip of the welder not being hot and not burning the human not the flame burning the person.
Thomaxonal 1 month ago
water no tax govtment will losssss billions of revenue because of water, the govt will make sure that this will not pass why because the govt will declare bunkcorruptcy
reasonrules2011 7 months ago
The stupid thing about this is that they are skipping the fact that to convert the water to HHO gas takes thousands of Kilowatt hours
philbot01 7 months ago 6
@philbot01 When used on a car, the fuel cell is powered by the car's battery, which is recharged by the alternator, therefore you don't need thousands of kilowatt hours, since this is a closed circuit. Check Stanley Meyers story. He crossed the US on a dune buggy in the eighties, using a more efficient fuel cell than this one, and exclusively water.
machintruc313 4 months ago
@machintruc313 Fucking herp derp. Go to uni, learn thermodynamics, and you will realise how stupid you were for thinking like that. Shit, go to school, do basic chemistry or physics and you will realise that you can not obtain energy from water, but only get energy from MAKING water. You're a fucking idiot, I'm sorry.
philbot01 4 months ago
@philbot01 I don't only think and talk, I do. I'm using a fuel cell on my car, which I made and greatly improves my MPG. Maybe if I stuck a plastic bottle full of dihydrogen and oxygen filled and produced by my fuel cell (resulting from the electrolysis of H2O, not by making H2O) while you read your chemistry book and crack a match, that would give you a different perspective on reality and certainly teach you respect. Asshole.
machintruc313 4 months ago
@machintruc313 Im sorry, No matter how much you 'do', your ignorance will still prevent you from realising that there is no such thing as overunity, which is what everyone here thinks it is. Yes, you can run a car on hydrogen. yes, the hydrogen is made from electrolysing water. What you are saying is not even coherent. I can understand that you cannot comprehend a basic concept if you can't even use the language properly.
philbot01 3 months ago
@philbot01 Troll! Hydrogen is energy, you can release it from water with very small amount of electricity.
fluxrez 3 months ago
@fluxrez Wrong. Hydrogen is not energy, hydrogen is a chemical. It has a chemical potential energy that it is given through electrolysis. You can only get as much energy from burning H2 as you can get from making it. So overall, there is a net increase of zero calories (Or joules, or any other unit of energy)
Please understand things more before you start calling people trolls.
philbot01 3 months ago
@philbot01 I completely agree it takes equal energy, but thats why you harvest the hydrogen with Sun power over a period of time. YES, its not efficient. YES, it's not really doable unless you have a setup that only someone who can afford a hydrogren collider could build... but thats the point. The tech needs to be developed further. He was a troll because of his 2 year old replies and ignoring what I was saying. Hydrogen is a combustable gas, just like gasoline. We need to harvest it.
fluxrez 3 months ago
@fluxrez Sorry, you can't harvest it, you must produce it, and that thakes more energy/money than it tastes!
Thermospecialist 3 months ago
So why isn't this more widely known about? Another factor is to be looked at the economics, caan this be adapted to power cars via direct electric motor driive or other? Hydrogen powered vehicles are touted as the only ones I've seen are a half million dollars and up.
Can one of these vehicles be afffordable for the middlee class? However dimminishing that class seems to be these days.
Cryptologist101 7 months ago
its funny how many people think that its so stupid to run with on board generation of hydrogen, yeah itd be alot smarter to drop in an electric motor. oh wait. what about all of the cars on the road that could use this system with little modification. i think this is the best thing to be used to settle some sort of transition from todays cars to tommorrows.
crodd63 7 months ago
he is taking the credit of a lot inventors and researchers.. he refers to Microsoft coming out of the garage.. that is a good scenario as Microsoft stole its begins too.
DaringSoule 7 months ago
the problem of using water is u end up using more energy to run something that holds energy...its a catch 22
inquiry10 7 months ago
@morrisburger1 The problem with the transition you describe is you're suggesting we use crackpot bullshit instead of actual science. You will get more miles out of the battery if you use it to drive an electric motor directly. Adding on-board hydrogen generation to the mix will REDUCE your miles per charge, not increase them.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 The problem with the transition you describe is you're suggesting we use crackpot bullshit instead of actual science. Generating browning gas in the moving car is a waste of energy and will NOT get you further than using the battery to drive an electric motor directly. You will get more miles out fo the battery if you use it to drive an electric motor directly. Adding on-board hydrogen generation to the mix will REDUCE your miles per charge, not increase them.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
Wind turbines performing electrolysis to fill hydrogen fuel cells or charge an electric battery overnight makes sense. Wasting the energy in that battery to perform electrolysis in the moving car results in a massive percentage of the available energy being wasted for the sake of saying the car runs on water.
Hydrogen is not a fuel source, it is a storage medium like a battery. On board electrolysis is no different that using one battery in the car to charge another.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 On board electrolysis wastes energy that would be better used driving an electric motor. Performing electrolysis in a moving car is, from a thermodynamics and science point of view, incredibly stupid.
I am not arguing against electric cars or hydrogen fuel cell cars. My only point is that the person behind this video is exploiting your ignorance of science to promote garbage.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 "No more arguments against the logic of not using fossil fuels? Good."
I never made any such arguments to begin with. It says a lot about your understanding of the science at hand that you feel the need to flat out lie about what I've written to try and make your point.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 It would be far more efficient to run the car directly from the battery. Performing electrolysis on board and then burning the resulting gas is a MASSIVE waste of energy. The theoretical maximum energy recovery is only about 80% on each conversion. Electrolysis is one conversion and burning the gas is another. You've wasted at least 40% of the energy in the battery with a futile conversion.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 "Perpetual Motion has only been mentioned by you"
They claim to be able to run a car on water alone. That's a perpetual motion machine, no matter what marketing BS they try to hide behind.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@morrisburger1 "You can create as much gas as you like on board as long as you have the electricity and water to do so"
On board electrolysis is a MASSIVE waste of energy. Using the electricity to drive the engine directly, as in a Prius or similar hybrid, is far more efficient that wasting a massive amount of the available energy in futile electrolysis.
I mentioned perpetual motion because that's the kind of sci-fi fantasy this "invention" is selling.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 "The other option? Keep doing it the way you're doing it, keep paying for petrol, keep killing for oil, keep making some rich bastards even richer. Way to go my friend, way to go."
That's a false dichotomy, we have more than the two options you outline, but as long as fools chase perpetual motion machines big oil will sit comfortably on top. We need to be researching viable energy sources, not throwing all our hope on cranks claiming to violate the laws of thermodynamics.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 "it doesn't matter how much energy is used in creating the HHO"
You're wrong. You are advocating this nonsense because you are deciding to deliberately ignore the generation side of the equation. Performing electrolysis in the car will not power the car. If you want a hydrogen fuel cell car you need to be using hydrogen generated elsewhere. None of this frees us from fossil fuel.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@morrisburger1 Water powered cars are a common scam. It's a variation on perpetual motion machines. Iit take more energy to perform electrolysis than you can recover from burning the resulting gas.
There are some engines that use the heat in the cylinder to flash water to steam, essentially adding a stroke, but that temperature variation reduces overall combustion efficiency and increases wear and tear on the cylinder.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
I love seeing the videos by these con artists. The claim that they can break the laws of Thermodynamics and yet are chasing pennies with car conversion kits! It's a riot.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
Oil is for those wanting to burn money. Be Cosmic ...
cosmicordering1 9 months ago
Inventions are always rediscovered, just as mathematics is rediscovered. Someone always thinks they have discovered something. This has already been discovered and buried decades ago. Gas prices rise because it can. Its like this, let's say you need 100 dollars to run your business, but now people use less of your product. So you raise your prices and continue business as normal. So you created a car that runs off of water. Oh great, so let's use both water and gas???? But it works with water!
mana619 9 months ago
Forced to sell I'm sure.
Pfffffff, that's just bad business running vehicles on something as inexpensive as WATER!? cmon now.
kosnow11 9 months ago
He was poisoned after being threatened by the oil companies when he wouldn't shut his project down
DesigsByJenny 9 months ago
5 years later, what happened?
AlphaSigma10 9 months ago
Amazing, and this was uploaded 5 years ago.
gimmepassword 9 months ago
This an amazing man. Keep it up! God Bless!
imjustlivin 9 months ago
We are getting fucked big, by oil companies and by drug companies banning cannabis, a completely face drug that anyone can grow for almost no money at all.
And in spain they found that injecting thc(cannabis) in to brain cancer it will eliminate the cancer completely and leave every cell in your body perfectly fine.
RainK9 9 months ago
What is this mans website?
thebreathingman 9 months ago
what i want to talk to him!
lookoutforyoursoul 9 months ago
May 2006? This guy was either bought off or killed
tersa1000 10 months ago
If this is true, from now on, the wars will have to started under true reasons, like "building the third temple", not under excuses of oil, saving civilians or such.
As the reason for WW1 and WW2 was that someone gets his "promised land" as "God's promised people".
ValarMorgoth 10 months ago
LETS FUCKIN DO IIIT
skaterheer2 10 months ago
Saw this on FOX 5 years ago. The guy gets awarded contracts to develop the technology for Hummvee's and APC's, and not a peep comes out since. So, did the oil companies stifle it? Most likely, they paid him and the next 3 generations off quite handsomely.
SpotterOz 10 months ago 6
@SpotterOz
Keep dreaming.
RisingPhoenix120 5 months ago
@SpotterOz Or... he gets brought up on charges for fraud... the embarrassed investors tried to keep it quiet to avoid losing face
Xero555000 5 months ago
Came here from ClixSense
EddieDaOnly1 10 months ago
you need electricity to break the water into HH2- great to replace chemical batteries..but you need to generate the electricity with something.
jsmythib 10 months ago
@jsmythib Hydrogen Fuel Cells... Look it up sometime.
SpotterOz 10 months ago
@SpotterOz No need...Ive built several. They dont just magically produce power :) Good tech tho..
jsmythib 10 months ago
SCAM
chris12me 10 months ago
This is a deceptive video..He is using hydrogen to supplement the gasoline..Made it sound like the car ran 100 miles on 4 oz of water alone..That engine would never run on hydrogen alone with that tiny hydrogen system he has...Producing a concentrated flame for a small torch is one thing..Generating enough horsepower to move a car is another.
chipper246 10 months ago
And wouldn't you know gas prices just keep rising!! WHAT a surprise... It's very very clear and should be clear to every American that our politicians are stopping progression in the name of profit for the oil companies!! WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
funkyflights 10 months ago 23
@funkyflights Of course. Politicians.... oh, wait. No.
GeekingForJesus 5 months ago
I dont think eletrolysis is the process going on here. I think that vibration induced via electric current is the key. Again is pure speculation. On the other hand Tesla lighted a light bulb using the earth magnetic field and touching the ground. Look it up, it was buried and this was at the beggining of the past century. Trust me if we can clone a sheep and we are decoding the human genome map, we can find better ways of producing cheap clean energy.
charlieboy52000 11 months ago 2
The Koch bothers aren't going to like this..btw when iron oxide nano wires are placed in water, and then in sunlight electrosysis takes place..
odluspa 11 months ago
"Hotter than the surface of the sun."
I don't know if I can believe that.
brooklyn336611 11 months ago
@brooklyn336611 I agree with you 150% on that...hotter then the surface of the sun?...stupidity i say
plairevenir 11 months ago
@plairevenir You really should do some research on topics you discuss, before offering an ignorant opinion. At least you would be an educated ignoramus then.
SpotterOz 10 months ago
Water is in lowest level of entropy and there is no way to get chemical energy
from it.
Only one way ... To spend lots of energy to decompose it to Hydrogen and
Oxygen.
Please read the laws of electrochemistry and thermodynamic before
wasting all your money.
vartatoosh 11 months ago
@vartatoosh A scientist has no ego. A scientist knows the laws of science and physics can be unmade and remade in the blink of an eye. If you say it doesn't work show us some proof.
Cstrife234 11 months ago
WOW if you know about electrochemistry and electrolysis, you should know about "cold fusion". This process has been hypothesized for at least 20 years. it has been hidden and all patents bought and never heard of again b/c now it is not the time to make it public. Oil companies’ don’t want this. Do your homework and find out about it because it is possible. I have a chemical engineering degree and a doctor in pharmacy degree.
charlieboy52000 11 months ago
"The claims for these devices have been found to be incorrect and some were found to be tied to investment frauds" Wikipedia: Water-fuelled_car
bagilevi 11 months ago
I want one
whitnef 11 months ago
never heard of fox 26 news
mileycyrus27309 11 months ago
since when did intellectuals interested in science become so sensitive? lol ssooooo FUNNY! IM SMARTER THAN YOU.......NO, I AM! NO YOU'RE NOT!... bbooo hoooo ya big babies. Lighten up! :)
Universa1ove 1 year ago
I fail to understand the drama here. the alternator creates electricity, the electricity seperates the hho gas, the gas powers the engine. Isnt that basically how it works. you need to start the engine with a fossil fuel, i would imagine.The engine will not be able to keep up to the actual gas created assuming that there is a litre a minute,
as for the torch, great idea, and would love to have one.
keembro 1 year ago
Go fuck your mother, The japaneese have used the same system to run a PRODUCTION car, It does 400km per LTR,
if you dont know anything, dont say anything,
to avoid talking crap :) Bitch!
spearsanythin 1 year ago 3
they killed him becouse the big fuel companys will got a concoration !
Thehaxorfull1 1 year ago
Notice the vid is from 2006. Ive got a suspicion he's probably dead. Stop public dependency on oil, kill the illuminati machine.
JewLoco 1 year ago
This will never happen, oil companies will make sure of that...
az015 1 year ago 61
@az015 You're right, as soon as something like this gets patented it gets hidden under the guise of 'national security'.
Namaste1001 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Namaste1001 "gets hidden under the guise of 'national security'."
Not true. Perpetual motion and free-energy machines are fiction. Con men have been exploiting the scientific illiteracy of Americans for a long, long time.
halleyscomet 8 months ago
@az015 This will never happen because it can't you're a fool
Xero555000 6 months ago
@az015
You mean governments, they are the ones who took interest in this and also the ones to stamp secrecy acts left and right.
TheGeneralOfWar 4 months ago
this thing uses as much water on a 100 mile trip as a jet engine uses in a minute
appleintosh 1 year ago
Hybrid will be the way to go with Electricity and Gasoline. Electric for short trips and gas oline kicks in when you need it for passing. Water is not customer friendly! Too many querks! The world had one of those. The vehicle had a boiler system running the PTO off steam pressure. Great for working trucks because it took a truck to carry it as it was big and bulky. Anything to do with water will freeze in colder climates unless you put an additive in it and guess what more expense.
dirthead87 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please help me win the Nissan Leaf!
Vote for my Leaf video by visiting this web address (which takes you within Nissan's web servers)
drivenissanleaf dotcom slash Win slash Vote dot aspx?b=248ZRV8WHPN9
Vote for me Please and tell your friends to vote and to spread it ;)
Vote by entering in your email address (junk emails too, the more the better)
Be sure to check those emails for a confirmation email in order for votes to count!
I only have until 12/9/2010 for votes
Thank you so so much!!
chughes380 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please help me win the Nissan Leaf!
Vote for my Leaf video by visiting this web address (which takes you within Nissan's web servers)
drivenissanleaf dotcom slash Win slash Vote dot aspx?b=248ZRV8WHPN9
Vote for me Please and tell your friends to vote and to spread it ;)
Vote by entering in your email address (junk emails too, the more the better)
Be sure to check those emails for a confirmation email in order for votes to count!
I only have until 12/9/2010 for votes
Thank you so so much!!
chughes372 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please help me win the Nissan Leaf!
Vote for my Leaf video by visiting this web address (which takes you within Nissan's web servers)
drivenissanleaf dotcom slash Win slash Vote dot aspx?b=248ZRV8WHPN9
Vote for me Please and tell your friends to vote and to spread it ;)
Vote by entering in your email address (junk emails too, the more the better)
Be sure to check those emails for a confirmation email in order for votes to count!
I only have until 12/9/2010 for votes
Thank you so so much!!
danwat1234 1 year ago
Support Clean Energy! Search for and watch "The Clean Energy Anthem"
KorElement 1 year ago
the ones that say hydrogen doesn't work....are idiots...its been going on for the last 30 years or more. they wanted hydrogen fill stations way back in the 70's it was even on the news..... and another enerygy is zero-point energy. if you noticed japans magnetic hybrid motar bike...check out austrailias invention :P
int3rc3pter 1 year ago
i see the world becoming very rainy and cloudy. nightmare in the winter too.
bow2deathwish 1 year ago
This fucker stole Stan Meyers work and now trying to become Bill Gates maybe he also want to patent combustion engine ? What a greedy bastard. Stan Meyers idea should spread around the world for free as fast as it can because disaster is coming up. A lot of human beings will starve to death because of oil shortages
BuRninsh 1 year ago
It makes me sad that people are stupid enough to believe that cars run on water. Didn't anyone take high school chemistry?
TheDaspiffy 1 year ago
Next they will make it run off pee..... it is only water and salt and a bit of other....
usernamen0tfound 1 year ago
I'm no chemist but i do understand fully of how a car works. Also, we don't have an infinite supply of fossil fuels. Its time for us to start perfecting running our machine we need in live on an alternative, safe for our environment, fuel. If we in the automotive field can produce over 100,000 volts with 12v DC, by just collapsing a magnetic field (ignition coil). Why cant we produce enough energy to create the hydrogen fuel??? i know its possible! Oh yeah, this guy is fish food by the way...
richas2000 1 year ago
the key is in the cycles of current per second through the fluid that causes the lowest voltage needs but regardless these cars really do run on water and the government is keeping a huge chunk of the worlds economy alive because billions could lose their jobs if water replaced oil in the energy market we think this is an evil action but the profits will be gone very soon and then the conversion will happen slowly give it another 25 years and they will allow it to come out in trickles.
roninblade19 1 year ago
This is not perpetual motion, it takes more energy to break up a stable substance into highly reactive components than said reaction releases. His "unique" electrolysis process" is not unique at all, there have been countless experiments and applications that involve electrolysis since the early 1900's. Hydrogen generated from this kind of machine has to be stored because it cannot be created fast enough for things like cars and torches.
emptyone 1 year ago
Comment removed
austinboboston1 1 year ago
also it would make logical sense what is a noble gas well litter gas or in other words fluid
austinboboston1 1 year ago
ive always wanted to know what would happen if you used litter fluid in a car or a main fuel source in something that requires a gas heck im just speakin nonsesne
austinboboston1 1 year ago
The gasoline companies shut him up already
LiveTheLimit 1 year ago
well i dont understand about this in detail but doesnt the engine produce electricity with the alternator? Well if it does then is almost a perfect cicle is almost the perfect machine if was no need to refill of water
brumasbusiness 1 year ago
But how do you produse electrisity???
saltfan2 1 year ago
My comment was in response to FlyingBlind10 who asked, Why are we still using gas after 4 years?
DOJIELDIENVE 1 year ago
This video is 4 years old! Why are we still using gas?
FlyingBlind10 1 year ago
The 'law of conservation of energy' does not apply if you are using HHO in combination with petrol to dramatically decrease petrol consumption. Petrol burns more efficiently with HHO in the mix. The setup is simple and can be done for $300-600.
An engine can be fueled solely by HHO, but it is not feasible due to the size of the cell needed, the complexity of electronics needed to optimize electrolysis output, spark timing compensation, and 'maybe' the 'law of conservation of energy' as well :P
Starcruiser81 1 year ago
Yes, he is using electrolysis to split H2O into Hydrogen and Oxygen. No big deal-junior high science. But he forgets to tell anyone how much electricity he is using to split the Hydrogen from the Oxygen. It takes more energy to split the water apart than you get beck recombining them.
Don't believe me, answer this: this is a 6 year old video. Why have we not heard from him again?
cpovey1 1 year ago
@cpovey1 some of the first cars ever where electric powered, then they mostly disappeared. we had reliable all electric cars on the streets 10 years ago and then they too disappeared. now very similar electric cars are back.
My point, It takes more than 6 years to get every one on board a concept like a car running on water electrolysis.The truth sucks.
DOJIELDIENVE 1 year ago
@DOJIELDIENVE I have nothing against electric cars-fine idea, the only general problem is short range. But what is being discussed here is running a car on water. Water must be split (electrolysis) into H2 and O2 to burn or use in a fuel cell-no big deal. The problem is it takes more energy to split water into H2 and O2 than you get back, thus you have a net energy loss.
cpovey1 1 year ago
Laws are made to be broken brutha!
Theovanikan 1 year ago
@Theovanikan ...not scientific ones lol
wizkid407 1 year ago
Man-mde laws, yes, but not the laws of nature.
cpovey1 1 year ago
WOW1 Nice! to bad we will never see other then in this video, Specially if you got the goverment involved!!!!! If is sounds to good to be true, it usually is!!!!
RANiEL1963 1 year ago
WOW1 Nice! to bad we will never see other then in this video, Specially if you got the goverment involved!!!!!
RANiEL1963 1 year ago
What the... the upload is from 2006!! It's 2010, what's happened since? Is there any follow up? Surely, by now they must have figured out how this really works or if its a fraud.
purplefetus3 1 year ago
@shanghaikidx And I bet the initial idea of a 55-65 mpg hybrid tickled the narcotic polluted Norwegian minds!!
puFoNiT 1 year ago
and now??
EverythingsPro 1 year ago
waren52nz DUDE! your not getting it are you? there is no hydrogen storing ,,its an on demande system.there for no inferstructure involved
vjfronk 1 year ago
what do you f-ing care? if it works it works. they just said his design passed ALL inspections. its alreddy a proven fact,its not up for debate.
vjfronk 1 year ago