k search youtube for "neutron star and black hole formation" and watch the video, its from a series called "the universe" which i love very much. it will prove i am right, for the final time NEUTRON STARS ARE STABLE OBJECTS. they arnt bound to crush themselves into black holes as you say. also read the wikipedia page on neutron stars as well why not?
its okay to be wrong but to not accept you're wrong is just stupid and it holds back science, yourself and the other people you "teach"
carl sagan worked for NASA if you didnt realise... why would i write to nasa telling them they are wrong about something when i believe they are right? i invite everyone who sees this and cares about astrophysics to looking it up for themselves and see.
truemaskedwabbit, i have sourced you to more than just wikipedia, i have sourced you to snippets of different documentaries also, type "NASA neutron star" into google, click the link to the nasa website and have a read and suck it...
Ok I have remained civil and polite with you and yet you seem not to be able to comply in the same manner so our conversation will come to an end. Im always willing to help anyone who wants to learn or even debate anything about science, but not with insults.
I will tell you this much before I go. In astro-physics you have to pay attention to details and be very literal and accurate in how things are conveyed and perceived.
You seem to be pretty much all over the place, the words are there but not the point.
10,000,000,000 years in geological terms is in a blink of an eye. So what do you think will be the end of the Neutron Star? The physicist at NASA gave you a very solid answer where is the contradiction with what I had said? And why are you bringing Carl Sagan into this? Yes I knew him very well I used to listen to his lectures, before you were born. So where is the point?
okay our galaxy is only about 15 billion years old, how is 10 billion the blink of an eye? you seem very reluctant to actually address the quotations i have placed for you to find both in the comment section here and inside your PM box, you have been condecending yourself so you also cannot lecture about keeping things civil, i was civil myself before you were condecending when i had actually provided you with several pieces of decent evidence.
the end of a neutron star, depends on what it runs into or not. yes anything can drift inside a black hole, but the universe follows laws of entropy, like black holes wont even last forever, they slowly radiate energy, and therefor lose mass, as will a neutron star, perhaps it might spiral into a black hole, maybe, maybe it will hit another neutron star and the two of them will make a black hole? maybe. but then again anything can become part of a black hole, me, you, the entire earth.
Im giving you a link via message from NASA white paper to understand astro-physics, Neutron Star and black hole (Schwarzschild) and perhaps youd consider going into some physics and mathematic classes seeing you are interested in science.
you have not given me a link yet, also, i have given you links to pages on the official public NASA website, where they state neutron stars are stable entities that last billions of years. you questioned the sources at first and mocked me, now i give you better sources and you say i'm being uncivil. congratulations you're a hypocrite and an idiot for being more stubborn than smart, because if you were smart, you'd know inside that i was right and just admit to it before you made a fool of urself
"Could you tell me how long a neutron star 'lives'? Different sources are all conflicting.
The Answer
If you're asking how long a neutron star can actually be detected as a pulsar, the answer is that in the most recent catalog of pulsars (pulsars are rotating neutron stars), the oldest ones are more than 10,000,000,000 years old (although the large majority of pulsars is between 100,000 and 300,000,000 years old."
we think about space...but space is thinking of us...Knowledge isn't really to be given but decoded or broken the explosions look kinda like the skin of jelly fishes the wirlwind's the tornado's our god and maybe otheres have inbarked this mechanical planet with something they didn't have,the power of reason,the art of life and the ability to gain,so it's more to this planet than seen...It's actually paradise...
i dont know what this is supposed to mean, also, you will have to PM me as my actual account has been blocked from posting on this board for humiliating the host
Neutron stars do collapse in on themselves and become a black hole. You might be thinking of white dwarfs which are collapsed stars at the mass as our own sun. Neutron stars are collapsed stars ten times or more the mass of our sun, they go super nova and then collapse in on themselves creating a black hole.
nope, you see white dwarfs are held up against the collapse of gravity by electron degeneracy pressure, IE you cant squash the electrons together. to over come this, neutron stars squash the electrons and protons together into pure neutrons, but then it is stopped from collapsing by the new neutron pressure.
they are two different stellar objects, saying all neutron stars will become black holes is like saying "all white dwarfs will become neutron stars"
(?) I have a feeling you misunderstood my comment. Thats right a white dwarf doesnt have enough mass (enough gravity) to collapse in on itself, thats why I said maybe you confused a white dwarf with a neutron star. An ordinary stars mass such as our sun when it dies it will shed the outer layers but the inner core does not go into a super nova and then into a neutron star, it becomes a white dwarf and thats where it stops, until its final death star dust or nuclear waste.
A neutron star is a star that has ten or more times the mass of our sun and the rest I would be repeating myself. I have a feeling your playing with me or you didnt understand why I said you may have confused a white dwarf with a neutron star. But thanks for watching and having an interest in science
ders crabs in dat der nebuler??? hey billy get me ma fishin net!!!
abobjenkins 10 months ago
Comment removed
abobjenkins 10 months ago
i'm loving this vid a lot.
Cogency1 2 years ago
no really, remember me for I thought I was the first to see such splendor. auriga RA 6h2m9s D 47degrees 1'
613timmy 2 years ago
k search youtube for "neutron star and black hole formation" and watch the video, its from a series called "the universe" which i love very much. it will prove i am right, for the final time NEUTRON STARS ARE STABLE OBJECTS. they arnt bound to crush themselves into black holes as you say. also read the wikipedia page on neutron stars as well why not?
its okay to be wrong but to not accept you're wrong is just stupid and it holds back science, yourself and the other people you "teach"
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
No I havent blocked you, Im not on the PC every day.
I tell you what, you write to NASA and tell all the physicists there that they are wrong and whoever wrote into Wikipedia is right.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
carl sagan worked for NASA if you didnt realise... why would i write to nasa telling them they are wrong about something when i believe they are right? i invite everyone who sees this and cares about astrophysics to looking it up for themselves and see.
truemaskedwabbit, i have sourced you to more than just wikipedia, i have sourced you to snippets of different documentaries also, type "NASA neutron star" into google, click the link to the nasa website and have a read and suck it...
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
Ok I have remained civil and polite with you and yet you seem not to be able to comply in the same manner so our conversation will come to an end. Im always willing to help anyone who wants to learn or even debate anything about science, but not with insults.
I will tell you this much before I go. In astro-physics you have to pay attention to details and be very literal and accurate in how things are conveyed and perceived.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
You seem to be pretty much all over the place, the words are there but not the point.
10,000,000,000 years in geological terms is in a blink of an eye. So what do you think will be the end of the Neutron Star? The physicist at NASA gave you a very solid answer where is the contradiction with what I had said? And why are you bringing Carl Sagan into this? Yes I knew him very well I used to listen to his lectures, before you were born. So where is the point?
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
okay our galaxy is only about 15 billion years old, how is 10 billion the blink of an eye? you seem very reluctant to actually address the quotations i have placed for you to find both in the comment section here and inside your PM box, you have been condecending yourself so you also cannot lecture about keeping things civil, i was civil myself before you were condecending when i had actually provided you with several pieces of decent evidence.
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
the end of a neutron star, depends on what it runs into or not. yes anything can drift inside a black hole, but the universe follows laws of entropy, like black holes wont even last forever, they slowly radiate energy, and therefor lose mass, as will a neutron star, perhaps it might spiral into a black hole, maybe, maybe it will hit another neutron star and the two of them will make a black hole? maybe. but then again anything can become part of a black hole, me, you, the entire earth.
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
Im giving you a link via message from NASA white paper to understand astro-physics, Neutron Star and black hole (Schwarzschild) and perhaps youd consider going into some physics and mathematic classes seeing you are interested in science.
Good luck and good bye.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
you have not given me a link yet, also, i have given you links to pages on the official public NASA website, where they state neutron stars are stable entities that last billions of years. you questioned the sources at first and mocked me, now i give you better sources and you say i'm being uncivil. congratulations you're a hypocrite and an idiot for being more stubborn than smart, because if you were smart, you'd know inside that i was right and just admit to it before you made a fool of urself
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
also, direct from the NASA website...
"Could you tell me how long a neutron star 'lives'? Different sources are all conflicting.
The Answer
If you're asking how long a neutron star can actually be detected as a pulsar, the answer is that in the most recent catalog of pulsars (pulsars are rotating neutron stars), the oldest ones are more than 10,000,000,000 years old (although the large majority of pulsars is between 100,000 and 300,000,000 years old."
mayb they should fire this physicist TMW?
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
Comment removed
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
all the music u use is beautiful!!!! ugh i want it all
RPattzGrlfrend 2 years ago
most of all...i will miss you
613timmy 2 years ago
bobo
leandroabreau 3 years ago
we think about space...but space is thinking of us...Knowledge isn't really to be given but decoded or broken the explosions look kinda like the skin of jelly fishes the wirlwind's the tornado's our god and maybe otheres have inbarked this mechanical planet with something they didn't have,the power of reason,the art of life and the ability to gain,so it's more to this planet than seen...It's actually paradise...
darkakrital 3 years ago
only science is real...god is a lie
613timmy 2 years ago
prove it
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
ARE YOU SERIOUS / i accept what is a marigold of your delusional childhood quest of whom you chose to be.
613timmy 2 years ago
i dont know what this is supposed to mean, also, you will have to PM me as my actual account has been blocked from posting on this board for humiliating the host
blazednlovinit2 2 years ago
i agree fully mate
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
Curtsies and smiles thanks for watching.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
Can a pulsar REALLY act as a black hole, or something like a black hole, I'l subscribe to anyone who answeres.
reality400 3 years ago
Pulsars are spinning neutron stars a neutron star will eventually collapse in on itself and become a black hole. Thanks for watching.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
Well thanks for answering.
reality400 2 years ago
although he answered inaccurate info... :P
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
ps. I'm a her - not a hare lol (not a he)
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
thats wrong..... neutron forces prevent the collapse of the star anymore. nothing says a neutron star has to become a black hole...
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
Neutron stars do collapse in on themselves and become a black hole. You might be thinking of white dwarfs which are collapsed stars at the mass as our own sun. Neutron stars are collapsed stars ten times or more the mass of our sun, they go super nova and then collapse in on themselves creating a black hole.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
nope, you see white dwarfs are held up against the collapse of gravity by electron degeneracy pressure, IE you cant squash the electrons together. to over come this, neutron stars squash the electrons and protons together into pure neutrons, but then it is stopped from collapsing by the new neutron pressure.
they are two different stellar objects, saying all neutron stars will become black holes is like saying "all white dwarfs will become neutron stars"
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
(?) I have a feeling you misunderstood my comment. Thats right a white dwarf doesnt have enough mass (enough gravity) to collapse in on itself, thats why I said maybe you confused a white dwarf with a neutron star. An ordinary stars mass such as our sun when it dies it will shed the outer layers but the inner core does not go into a super nova and then into a neutron star, it becomes a white dwarf and thats where it stops, until its final death star dust or nuclear waste.
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
i didnt misunderstand i said neutron stars cant be squashed anymore as the neutron forces hold them up.
what i said was it was MUCH LIKE white dwarfs as they are held up by subatomic forces as well.
a black hole ISNT held up by anything, therefor it is neither a white dwarf, not a neutron star.
so the big difference here is, Neutron stars are held up against gravity, where black holes have fully buckled under gravity :)
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
A neutron star is a star that has ten or more times the mass of our sun and the rest I would be repeating myself. I have a feeling your playing with me or you didnt understand why I said you may have confused a white dwarf with a neutron star. But thanks for watching and having an interest in science
truemaskedwabbit 2 years ago
Comment removed
blazednlovinit 2 years ago
Superb vid and some great music - thanks for posting
Peedlebum 3 years ago
cool vid
r3bel5k83r 4 years ago