You are so sure of yourself that I believe you should write that book on Quantum Physics. Good luck with your position as Satan's spokesperson. Hopefully, you will want to climb the ladder to become God's spokesperson. But, you have to apply for the position. Ask Jesus to show you how.
I think we skeptics should just that: publish a new edition of the Jewish & Christian Bibles, as well as the Koran, with introductions refuting the God Hypothesis, and foot notes pointing out all the inconsistenties and down right contradictions in each.
You say evolution has nothing to do with the Bing Bang. That is technically correct - the Big Bang is physics and astronomy, and evolution is biology. However, both are linked.
Unless you are a theistic evolutionist who believes God (or some other higher being) created everything and then let it evolve, you must account for how everything started. And most evolutionists who deny there is a God believe in some form of the Big Bang theory.
I dont have a problem with your comment "theistic evolutionist who believes God (or some other higher being) created everything and then let it evolve" I and many others here are happy to except that, I know that evolution is true, its true through the evidence we can observe/test. Some great examples in the latest publication from R Dawkins.
I dont believe in the god of the bible, nor the god of the quran, 0 evidence to support them.
@AA32m7io1 All sciences follow the same standards. Peer-reviewed standards. All sciences are inter connected with evolution. If people don't understand common sense you can't help them.No cure for stupidity currently exists. Stupid people render opinions about subjects for which they could never understand. I don't understand it but it's very common now. Fox news channel does it everyday.Explaining away 400 years of scientific knowledge with a book they haven't read or understand.Brainwashing~
Well, I for one believe there are extra processes in the process of evolution, with the main being non random selection (Charles Darwin), and AS (artificial selection) humans have had their hand in a lot of speciation.
Dino Bird fossils have been found and conclusively proves (although I believe we had the evidence already) that birds evolved from dinos, search google for dino birds, they predate Archaeopteryx by 10 million yrs.
Also the 61% seems low because it's not taking into account that the rest of those people who might be theists are not fundamentalists and are not necessarily people who reject evolution.
It's going to be pretty funny when the people at those universities rip out those fifty pages and throw them away in front of the Way of the Master goons.
50,000 copies of a moronic document that people are not going to read!!!! younger generations are atheists because of the information available.... not because their teachers are whatever their are....
First of all, theres no proof whatsoever that humans were chimps. Secondly, I dont live on trees like maybe you and your ancestor do. So sorry, Im human, with iq, unlike certain people who say they believe only in what they see, and then believe in something completely hypotethical with no proof.
Weve discoveret fossils and dinosaur that go back millions of years, but stillm I never heard of anyone finding "our ancestors". I wish they find it someday, maybe then you at least have proof.
You don't understand the theory of evolution fully.
Humans were never chimps. The theory of evolution states that humans and chimps had a common ancestor about seven million years ago. There are plenty of of early human fossil records. In fact there is an entire field of science dedicated to early human fossils called biological anthropology.
wikipedia- "biological anthropology"
Please don't argue with me until you've done some preliminary research.
It doesnt matter how you look at it. What I said has nothing to do with understanding ET "fully" or partly.
It seems like you need to do some research yourself, perhaps maybe take a look at your first reply...
We havent found any shared ancestor bones anywhere. Or have we?
I believe ET, but not chimps-> human, because it is not proven. However I believe every animal has an early ancestor. But humans were always human. But that doesnt mean its a solid evidence to believe in a god.
-but they did have a common ancestor. We have many many transitional fossils. To name a few:
Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis
Who said humans were chimps? No one supporting evolution from what I hear.
"So sorry, Im human, with iq, unlike certain people who say they believe only in what they see, and then believe in something completely hypotethical with no proof."
Ironically a majority of scientists having high IQ don't have a problem with evolution as you do.
Fossils alone might give you some hint of how linked some species may be. However, fossils, cell biology and phylogenetics provides a better insight.
Well, if its been observed that "our ape ancestors" "slowly" evolved tthen Ive not heard of it Im afraid.
To put it simply in a way my kid brother would understand; early swordfish ancestors were actually cows, watercows to be more spesific. The fishs ancestors. Fish was ofcourse not cow, but the cow slowly evolved into fish that can breathe in water.--
However, can someone in a state of an undoctrinated student believe this without asking the very simple question, what about the evidence?
Kirk Cameron! Our constitution mentions no supreme god of any kind. Scientist do not picket churches so don't pass out your idolatry on the free thinking individuals with common sense. Keep your purveyor's out of the public schools. Just in case you are interested we have separation of church and state, Evolution is science intelligent design is voo-doo.
You are so sure of yourself that I believe you should write that book on Quantum Physics. Good luck with your position as Satan's spokesperson. Hopefully, you will want to climb the ladder to become God's spokesperson. But, you have to apply for the position. Ask Jesus to show you how.
golfingmenace 1 year ago
True indeed.
Kailoa36 2 years ago
I think we skeptics should just that: publish a new edition of the Jewish & Christian Bibles, as well as the Koran, with introductions refuting the God Hypothesis, and foot notes pointing out all the inconsistenties and down right contradictions in each.
Kailoa36 2 years ago
1 of 2
You say evolution has nothing to do with the Bing Bang. That is technically correct - the Big Bang is physics and astronomy, and evolution is biology. However, both are linked.
Unless you are a theistic evolutionist who believes God (or some other higher being) created everything and then let it evolve, you must account for how everything started. And most evolutionists who deny there is a God believe in some form of the Big Bang theory.
So how do you believe things started?
AA32m7io1 2 years ago
I dont have a problem with your comment "theistic evolutionist who believes God (or some other higher being) created everything and then let it evolve" I and many others here are happy to except that, I know that evolution is true, its true through the evidence we can observe/test. Some great examples in the latest publication from R Dawkins.
I dont believe in the god of the bible, nor the god of the quran, 0 evidence to support them.
LozTheAtheist 2 years ago
@AA32m7io1 All sciences follow the same standards. Peer-reviewed standards. All sciences are inter connected with evolution. If people don't understand common sense you can't help them.No cure for stupidity currently exists. Stupid people render opinions about subjects for which they could never understand. I don't understand it but it's very common now. Fox news channel does it everyday.Explaining away 400 years of scientific knowledge with a book they haven't read or understand.Brainwashing~
ScrewGlennBeck 11 months ago
2 of 2
Second, which theory of evolution do you ascribe to?
Dawrin: Natural Selection (changes occur gradually over long periods of time via mutations)
Schindewolf & Goldschmidt: 'hopeful monster' (instantaneous-speciation, saltation, or systemic mutation)
Eldredge & Gould: 'punctuated equilibrium' (abrupt appearance of species in the fossil record)
All three theories of evolution are radically different from each other. So which is the correct one?
AA32m7io1 2 years ago
Well, I for one believe there are extra processes in the process of evolution, with the main being non random selection (Charles Darwin), and AS (artificial selection) humans have had their hand in a lot of speciation.
Dino Bird fossils have been found and conclusively proves (although I believe we had the evidence already) that birds evolved from dinos, search google for dino birds, they predate Archaeopteryx by 10 million yrs.
LozTheAtheist 2 years ago
The problem is that creationists deny the existence of transitional fossils.
DarkAngel182 2 years ago
Also the 61% seems low because it's not taking into account that the rest of those people who might be theists are not fundamentalists and are not necessarily people who reject evolution.
SeekerLancer 2 years ago
It's going to be pretty funny when the people at those universities rip out those fifty pages and throw them away in front of the Way of the Master goons.
SeekerLancer 2 years ago
dude that picture with the joker looks awesome :D
TurboDally 2 years ago
yes the missing link was found BTW- google search "national geographic/ missing link found" and see for yourself... LEMUR monkeys. NEXT topic....
squeegiegrrl 2 years ago
50,000 copies of a moronic document that people are not going to read!!!! younger generations are atheists because of the information available.... not because their teachers are whatever their are....
lapiz1969 2 years ago 3
I would think they are closer to Pinky and the Brain, but replace Brain's super intelligence, with money.
Atriviality 2 years ago
What a likable guy you are.
I'm just struck by it. How can God sent you to hell?
ContinuumXT 2 years ago
I believe in evolution, but not the ape--> human thing.
snake1mi 2 years ago
@snake1mi
we are apes right now.
are you trying to say something along the lines of-
"I don't believe chimps and humans had a common ancestor."
If you don't believe that then you don't believe in evolution.
What kind of evolution do you believe in?
DrewsAnimation 2 years ago 2
First of all, theres no proof whatsoever that humans were chimps. Secondly, I dont live on trees like maybe you and your ancestor do. So sorry, Im human, with iq, unlike certain people who say they believe only in what they see, and then believe in something completely hypotethical with no proof.
Weve discoveret fossils and dinosaur that go back millions of years, but stillm I never heard of anyone finding "our ancestors". I wish they find it someday, maybe then you at least have proof.
snake1mi 2 years ago
@snake1mi
You don't understand the theory of evolution fully.
Humans were never chimps. The theory of evolution states that humans and chimps had a common ancestor about seven million years ago. There are plenty of of early human fossil records. In fact there is an entire field of science dedicated to early human fossils called biological anthropology.
wikipedia- "biological anthropology"
Please don't argue with me until you've done some preliminary research.
DrewsAnimation 2 years ago 2
also look up
"Paleoanthropology"
DrewsAnimation 2 years ago
Comment removed
snake1mi 2 years ago
It doesnt matter how you look at it. What I said has nothing to do with understanding ET "fully" or partly.
It seems like you need to do some research yourself, perhaps maybe take a look at your first reply...
We havent found any shared ancestor bones anywhere. Or have we?
I believe ET, but not chimps-> human, because it is not proven. However I believe every animal has an early ancestor. But humans were always human. But that doesnt mean its a solid evidence to believe in a god.
snake1mi 2 years ago
I'm done suffering fools.
-nobody believes chimps---> humans
-but they did have a common ancestor. We have many many transitional fossils. To name a few:
Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis
Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus africanus
I'm done arguing with you.
DrewsAnimation 2 years ago 3
Youre not arguing, youre just listening to your own inner Homo floresiensis brain.
Those are chimps moron.
snake1mi 2 years ago
Get an eductaion.
I don't want to insult you. . . I just pity you're ignorance.
DrewsAnimation 2 years ago
the missing link was found - google search "national geographic/ missing link found" and see for yourself... LEMUR monkeys.
squeegiegrrl 2 years ago
Who said humans were chimps? No one supporting evolution from what I hear.
"So sorry, Im human, with iq, unlike certain people who say they believe only in what they see, and then believe in something completely hypotethical with no proof."
Ironically a majority of scientists having high IQ don't have a problem with evolution as you do.
Fossils alone might give you some hint of how linked some species may be. However, fossils, cell biology and phylogenetics provides a better insight.
TurboDally 2 years ago
Well, if its been observed that "our ape ancestors" "slowly" evolved tthen Ive not heard of it Im afraid.
To put it simply in a way my kid brother would understand; early swordfish ancestors were actually cows, watercows to be more spesific. The fishs ancestors. Fish was ofcourse not cow, but the cow slowly evolved into fish that can breathe in water.--
However, can someone in a state of an undoctrinated student believe this without asking the very simple question, what about the evidence?
snake1mi 2 years ago
Kirk Cameron! Our constitution mentions no supreme god of any kind. Scientist do not picket churches so don't pass out your idolatry on the free thinking individuals with common sense. Keep your purveyor's out of the public schools. Just in case you are interested we have separation of church and state, Evolution is science intelligent design is voo-doo.
Dwicker64 2 years ago