Must plug the 1943 Furtwangler performance of the 7th with all its playful intensity and perfectly bitter-sweet 2nd mvmt . This performance of the 9th seems fearful and rigid. This is definitely not 1951, though. Those are nazi swastikas, and nazi military men in the audience. It should be the 1942 performance with Berlin Philharmonic. Furtwangler hated the nazis and used his fame to preserve arts in Berlin during the war. He also helped several jewish musicians escape Germany. LOL@handwipe!
p.s. AND WHY always IDIOTS ARE MAJORITY ? there is a some "philosophers"
"criticizing"....?! about tempo..?! HAHAHAHA....ahhhh capital jesting ! WE ARE SO UNLUCKY for not having FURTWANGLER as our contemporary...SO UNFORTUNATE !...SO MISERABLE !
What kind of energy spreading from Furtwangler's mind ? Why even most bad sound-quality recordings of this GENIUS - MASTER , makes me cry ? & keeps me speechless ?
die entnazifizierung der amerikaner in oesterreich war eine augenauswischerei.... Alle brauchbaren eleemente wurden entnazifiziert. der sozialist und Jude Kreisky hat dann sogar nazis in seine Regierung genommen und war persona non grata in Israel. Nazis haben in Kaernten arbeit und Zuflucht bekommen (Reeder!!!!) und lebten dort unbehelligt bis heute... Das schafft kein gesundes Klima fuer Musik die aus dem Herzen kommen soll....
We have lost so much - Furtwangler was one of the last conductor with a direct connection to the Romantic Period ... you will hear nothing like this today, nothing! This is how it was meant to sound - the passion is amazing.
The 1942 Furtwangler is his greatest recorded 9th, followed by 1954 Lucerne and 1951 Bayreuth. They all have points of interest, though, because Furtwangler was and remains the greatest conductor of all time known to me through recordings and videos. He often transcended music, seeing music as a cosmic, spiritual experience.
You are a man after my own heart. He is the greatest of all time. No one seems able to hear at such a profound level (at the level at which the composer himself heard?). Thank you for your comments. Do you know about his teacher, Heinrich Schenker? Furtwangler said he never understood Beethoven until he read Schenker's explanation of the Fifth's tonal plan!
I would very much agree that the 1942 performance which I first came across on a double LP is completely amazing. The first movement in particular is volcanic - can't really think of as suitable adjective!. However one does have a chill when one thinks who in the Nazi elite was probably in the audience. I have the other 2 on CD as well. I think his wartime Bruckner 9th is also well worth hearing for the same intensity.
Absolutely, as a conductor myself I can offer my whole hearted agreement with your statement.
Nobody to my knowledge took the final bars of the 9th faster that Furtwanger.
Of course that choice can cause soem lack of precision, but Furtwangler would always choose emotional communication over technical perfection. That was his calling card.
I agree, it is dodgy... A bit like a deranged monkey with cymbals. But you have to admit, it adds to the excitement, especially where Furtwanglers' interpretation is concerned...
Gustav Mahler's symphony no 8 "of a thousand" performers, especially the finale of the 2-nd part, based upon Goethe's poem "Faust" is even greater than this, guys! Listen and evaluate!
Grossini, you are a moron, not only because you have no taste but because unlike your idol Frutolini, you apparently don't know that the last bars of the Ninth are marked "prestissimo." You're not as much of a moron, though, as that goddamned woman talking over the ending of this video. Hope she died a slow and painful death.
@idesof Don't you mean "Götterdämmerung" woman? Would a conductor's baton inserted anally been appropriate enough? I detest people who start clapping after a performance has begun or finished and similar cretins who jump to their feet indiscriminately. Why is it that pillories are no longer available for punishment of such riff-raff?
I prefer the 1942 recording, found elsewhere in youtube, it has better playing and more "fire" to it. Don't get me wrong, I love Furtwangler, but when you compare the 1942 with 1951 versions, the first one wins hands down for me. 1951 was too close to the end of the war, and artists, like everybody else, had just experienced a real hell;it is understandable that they would sound more tired.
Wow this is lib antisemite terrorist propoganda.We need 2fight the iranins in iran so we dont have 2fight thm hre.Ulibs need 2b detained untl ucan prove u r not a teroist.Ifany iraqi tries 2take myFREEDOM I will blowup his cave cmd cntr.IranNchina hve been stckpling WMDs2 useaginst us an our Israeli friends in th form of a mushroom cloud in th global wr n terror.When market crash and final nuke/bio battle come we need worldgovt+world bank+hive mind+every1 get microchip so prs bush cn kep us safe
Yes, you are right. But the greatest honour a conductor can have is when his music-making causes the listeners to forget about the 'performance' and reminds them of how great the composer was. At the end of Karajan's overwhelming Bruckner 5 one is no longer thinking of Karajan; one of thinking only of Bruckner's genius. And it's the same with some of Furtwangler's Beethoven recordings; at the end we are left in awe of Beethoven, which is a great tribute to Furtwangler's powers.
What a pity about the voiceover and the vido cut at the end! If there were a video somewhere of a Furtwangler performance of the Beethoven Ninth from beginning to end it would be priceless. As it is this is a remarkable document, showing how the tempo relationships he chose were reflected in the beat. Unfortunately the video of the 1942 performance is marred by frequent cuts to the audience. Given that, this is probably the best visual document of his way with the Ninth.
Must plug the 1943 Furtwangler performance of the 7th with all its playful intensity and perfectly bitter-sweet 2nd mvmt . This performance of the 9th seems fearful and rigid. This is definitely not 1951, though. Those are nazi swastikas, and nazi military men in the audience. It should be the 1942 performance with Berlin Philharmonic. Furtwangler hated the nazis and used his fame to preserve arts in Berlin during the war. He also helped several jewish musicians escape Germany. LOL@handwipe!
andyfrostman76 1 year ago
I hate the voice! I want hear Fürtwangler conducting the Ninth Symphony, no that stupid voice!
lamanodeonansequeja 1 year ago
p.s. AND WHY always IDIOTS ARE MAJORITY ? there is a some "philosophers"
"criticizing"....?! about tempo..?! HAHAHAHA....ahhhh capital jesting ! WE ARE SO UNLUCKY for not having FURTWANGLER as our contemporary...SO UNFORTUNATE !...SO MISERABLE !
sam0xin 1 year ago
What kind of energy spreading from Furtwangler's mind ? Why even most bad sound-quality recordings of this GENIUS - MASTER , makes me cry ? & keeps me speechless ?
sam0xin 1 year ago
die entnazifizierung der amerikaner in oesterreich war eine augenauswischerei.... Alle brauchbaren eleemente wurden entnazifiziert. der sozialist und Jude Kreisky hat dann sogar nazis in seine Regierung genommen und war persona non grata in Israel. Nazis haben in Kaernten arbeit und Zuflucht bekommen (Reeder!!!!) und lebten dort unbehelligt bis heute... Das schafft kein gesundes Klima fuer Musik die aus dem Herzen kommen soll....
uhartchristian 2 years ago
We have lost so much - Furtwangler was one of the last conductor with a direct connection to the Romantic Period ... you will hear nothing like this today, nothing! This is how it was meant to sound - the passion is amazing.
joncaves 2 years ago 8
@joncaves This wasn't the 'romantic' period this was the height of the best classical composers and the classical period. -.-
tubephr34k 1 week ago in playlist More videos from franciszhou
Too fast at the end!
Horrendously fast.
YTM021807 3 years ago
The 1942 Furtwangler is his greatest recorded 9th, followed by 1954 Lucerne and 1951 Bayreuth. They all have points of interest, though, because Furtwangler was and remains the greatest conductor of all time known to me through recordings and videos. He often transcended music, seeing music as a cosmic, spiritual experience.
billyguns2 3 years ago 5
You are a man after my own heart. He is the greatest of all time. No one seems able to hear at such a profound level (at the level at which the composer himself heard?). Thank you for your comments. Do you know about his teacher, Heinrich Schenker? Furtwangler said he never understood Beethoven until he read Schenker's explanation of the Fifth's tonal plan!
robertssje 3 years ago
I would very much agree that the 1942 performance which I first came across on a double LP is completely amazing. The first movement in particular is volcanic - can't really think of as suitable adjective!. However one does have a chill when one thinks who in the Nazi elite was probably in the audience. I have the other 2 on CD as well. I think his wartime Bruckner 9th is also well worth hearing for the same intensity.
ollierdevon 3 years ago
Absolutely, as a conductor myself I can offer my whole hearted agreement with your statement.
Nobody to my knowledge took the final bars of the 9th faster that Furtwanger.
Of course that choice can cause soem lack of precision, but Furtwangler would always choose emotional communication over technical perfection. That was his calling card.
I wish more conductors would do that now.
lovelymess 3 years ago 4
Right, he was transcendental.
He was a real artist.
toyodafamily2008 3 years ago
Comment removed
Invisus944 3 years ago
one seriously dodgy cymbal at the end.
roosta0013 3 years ago 2
I agree, it is dodgy... But you have to admit, it adds to the excitement, especially where Furtwanglers' interpretation is concerned...
NnFfBb 3 years ago
I agree, it is dodgy... A bit like a deranged monkey with cymbals. But you have to admit, it adds to the excitement, especially where Furtwanglers' interpretation is concerned...
NnFfBb 3 years ago
beautiful "sanfter Fluegeln"
1psoas9 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gustav Mahler's symphony no 8 "of a thousand" performers, especially the finale of the 2-nd part, based upon Goethe's poem "Faust" is even greater than this, guys! Listen and evaluate!
dntpntr 3 years ago
The 1942 ninth is The ninth. I decide not to listen to it too much time to not decrease his emotional impact over me
vinciano 3 years ago
From a Rossini lover i cant'expect anything except this shit comments. i forget, i'm italian.
vinciano 3 years ago
I'm sorry about what I've said earlier. Apparently you're not the real Richard Kastle but only an imposter. My apologies to Richard Kastle.
iambananananananana 4 years ago
What a lousy arrogant redneck.
Talk big after you've tried conducting the 9th yourself.
iambananananananana 4 years ago
Oh...dieses unerträgliche Gelaber....
Mahler1912 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Toscanini and Bernstein make the overrated Furt look like a rank amateur. Tempi are all wrong and his gallop at the end is inexcusable
grossini1 4 years ago
Grossini, you are a moron, not only because you have no taste but because unlike your idol Frutolini, you apparently don't know that the last bars of the Ninth are marked "prestissimo." You're not as much of a moron, though, as that goddamned woman talking over the ending of this video. Hope she died a slow and painful death.
idesof 4 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes, but it should not be conducted THAT fast. You can't hear a thing!
Maestrojosh87 2 years ago
Old cameras, old film... etc... etc
grThetrojan01gr 2 years ago
@grThetrojan01gr
and???
FOFO730 1 year ago
@FOFO730 what do you mean "and???"? I wasn't even talking to you.
grThetrojan01gr 1 year ago
@idesof I support you & REALLY want to kill that CHICKEN - PARROT- PORKY-PIG !
sam0xin 1 year ago
@idesof
prestissimo? uhmmmm
i think it sounds better in presto
Josep489 1 year ago
@idesof Don't you mean "Götterdämmerung" woman? Would a conductor's baton inserted anally been appropriate enough? I detest people who start clapping after a performance has begun or finished and similar cretins who jump to their feet indiscriminately. Why is it that pillories are no longer available for punishment of such riff-raff?
verziehen 6 months ago
I prefer the 1942 recording, found elsewhere in youtube, it has better playing and more "fire" to it. Don't get me wrong, I love Furtwangler, but when you compare the 1942 with 1951 versions, the first one wins hands down for me. 1951 was too close to the end of the war, and artists, like everybody else, had just experienced a real hell;it is understandable that they would sound more tired.
majortom51970 4 years ago 2
The audio quality of this video is awful! There's no denying Furtwanger's genius. His Schubert Symphony 9 is iconic. Never equalled!!
andrewsfunk 4 years ago
I think the announcer says the soloists are Irmgard Seefried, Sieglinde Wagner, Anton Dermota and Joseph Greindl.
richiedrr 4 years ago
再问一下,这个是不是富老在拜伦伊特音乐节上指挥的贝9?感谢作答
bwv1058 4 years ago
yep, it is .
skymj 4 years ago
how do you know? are you the one who upload this video?
bwv1058 4 years ago
Because the announcer says it, moron.
Obaysch 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow this is lib antisemite terrorist propoganda.We need 2fight the iranins in iran so we dont have 2fight thm hre.Ulibs need 2b detained untl ucan prove u r not a teroist.Ifany iraqi tries 2take myFREEDOM I will blowup his cave cmd cntr.IranNchina hve been stckpling WMDs2 useaginst us an our Israeli friends in th form of a mushroom cloud in th global wr n terror.When market crash and final nuke/bio battle come we need worldgovt+world bank+hive mind+every1 get microchip so prs bush cn kep us safe
prokkets 4 years ago
an average performance. Lacking in gravitas and correct tempi.
arcanus121 4 years ago
Was a great conductor; But one has to look at the composer, who was the greatest genius of ALL!!
Scorberg 4 years ago
Yes, you are right. But the greatest honour a conductor can have is when his music-making causes the listeners to forget about the 'performance' and reminds them of how great the composer was. At the end of Karajan's overwhelming Bruckner 5 one is no longer thinking of Karajan; one of thinking only of Bruckner's genius. And it's the same with some of Furtwangler's Beethoven recordings; at the end we are left in awe of Beethoven, which is a great tribute to Furtwangler's powers.
BrucknerEnthusiast 4 years ago 3
The way wipes his hand after shaking Hitlers is priceless.
markedhands 4 years ago
It's Goebbels in that video, not Hitler. (and since Hitler isn't there someone uploaded the video with a wrong title)
algocalmin 3 years ago
goebbels isnt in this vid, he was dead in 1951, he killed himself after hitler in the bunker in berlin
Gunney918 3 years ago
Ups, my comment was for "Furtwangler on 4.19.1942 Full edition" video, sorry.
algocalmin 3 years ago
It is a great joy to take a look of this legendary movie film.
captainkirk4761 4 years ago
The greatest Beethoven conductor of all time.
Freudboy 5 years ago
The voiceover almost ruins this valuable video clip.
The final moments (from: 2:36 to 2:47) is horribly fast. This was customary of W.F. All the rest of his Beethoven 9th was sublime.
YTM021807 5 years ago
In my opinion that acceleration in the final beats is bright.
superburp 4 years ago
What a pity about the voiceover and the vido cut at the end! If there were a video somewhere of a Furtwangler performance of the Beethoven Ninth from beginning to end it would be priceless. As it is this is a remarkable document, showing how the tempo relationships he chose were reflected in the beat. Unfortunately the video of the 1942 performance is marred by frequent cuts to the audience. Given that, this is probably the best visual document of his way with the Ninth.
leex1214 5 years ago