After three years of investigation, my thought: the planes was TOTALLY REAL: the first plane was a small jet, the second plane was a Big military grey plane.
@Inigo37 did you WATCH the video? lol what /plane/, what /jet/? was it the fairweather wing? the soundless ufo melding with the confused (and oftentimes), faceless building? that big, grey honker musta disintegrated, huh?
Evan left his camera on the floor or similar pointing up at the WTC. Easy enough to find if you look for it. As for the majority of the video, why is it 7 years after the incident Americans STILL don't know what artifacts are? Has Google truly censored the US, banning it from Wiki's Compression_artifact page?
you know what else is unrealistic? that people who are against the truthers would come to this video and camp out, waiting to troll comments. If you so vehemently don't believe 911 was faked, what is your motive to even watch this video? To get mad and reply to anonymous people? I don't buy it.
@edyken77 damn...you caught on...we are hired by govt. to try to shoot down these efforts you make to show what really...I mean ...to show what you say happened. Hope I didn't lose my job for letting the cat out of the bag. By the way...your work...fabulous!
Is Evan lying down on his back in the middle of the street in order to take this video? And where is the audio? He's been a "cameraman for 16 yrs" and doesn't have audio on his wide angle camera?
And the fact that this guy shows no "reaction" until the tower EXPLODES is very telling. He shows no signs of HEARING a PLANE APPROACHING DIRECTLY ABOVE HIS HEAD!
The "windshield reflection" seems WRONG!--It is too far away from the tower&facing in the wrong direction. How could it reflect the "plane"?
I've heart the dumbest persons talking about ghost sightings, that aliens are landed and that the moonlanding was fake. I never believed one of them but this time it's different. Simon opened my eyes on the real story behind 9/11.
@simonshack I'm not the one making the claims in YOUR video Simes - let's hear it. It's easy for guys like you to carp from the sidelines which you're doing a fine job on incidentally, but let's hear it. What back up have you got for your claims? Any peer reviewed stuff or just your opinions? Ah, right, okay. Move on everyone, nothing to see here - just another guy who thinks it was a stitch up. Move on, move on...etc. Oh - thanks!
Love the comment at 5.24 - "whoever forged this shot had no notion of physics". So tell me Simon, are you a physicist? So many claims, made so authoratatively and yet completely bereft of any independent peer reviewed critique beyond the poster's opinion. I imagine much of this is video is a collection of images and statements of the owner's opinions and not a whole lot more. Conjecture, no more, no less.
Well, at least I know how to spell "authoritatively" :o)
If you are a physicist yourself, you are welcome to explain what we see in the 9/11 videos - featuring aluminum airplanes melding into steel structures without a single piece of wing appendage - not even a slice of an aft aileron - shearing off on impact. All we see is a plane disappearing inside the WTC as if he building was made out of Jell-O.
So tell me now, Mr Motornut: what is your definition of 'conjecture'?
@simonshack I'm not a physicist, but I don't think you are either. You might ask someone who can can speak with experience re: impact analysis, motion, etc. and not a bunch of guys on the internet saying "hey, that don't look right!". So far, all you've continued to offer is just that. I'm not suggesting I can provide the answers for you, just I don't buy your line of questioning. Good luck with the spelling bee by the bye...
@simonshack I think one of them would be watching your videos and others like them. Essentially "I think this must have happened" even when more experienced and qualified persons could or have established this. Sorry for the late reply, I have a life.
@simonshack you are just so full of shit....you've wasted so much energy on trying to make this thing fit your theory. Ever see "Cops" where the bad guy runs the stolen corvette into the back of a semi @ over 100 mph. The car is cut in half and there is the driver sitting on the ground. Well, now we know it's faked. You are just so full mof shit.
Even if i am a conspiracy supporter, as a major broadcast cameraman i must tell you that every broadcast eng camera had a very high resolutiton b/w viewfinder whith analogic detail enancement for focus control and yes, you see mor clear than the master analogic tape because the signal is taked before the recording.
There's something veeery wrong with this footage: The reflex of the object! Simple: The angle of a windshield would really reflect a object, but only if the object were ABOVE! So, to reflect the plane/object/missile, the must be below the tower. Totally below!
it's so obvious but it's totally unbelievable to the countless millions of you already brainwashed by tv . so to all the skeptics and dis-informers and non-believers out there , maybe you should open your little minds and awake from your deep sleep . and don't underestimate the powers of the dark side . seek the truth . God bless all those affected by 9-11 and to everyone involved in making the real truth be known . Next chapter for NWO , aliens ! stay alert . may the force be with you .
This is too cruel to be true. I don't understand....why? How could the US government be so cruel????????????? This is.....this is too much......this work of beyond evil. Is just pure demonic. I still don't understand. Why US government, WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO YOUR OWN PEOPLE! What sick reason you have for this???!! Oil? Money? Jews? WHY!!??
I don't fucking understand anymore I totally agree that 9/11 was an inside job but what the hell is up with all the different theories? Some people say the planes that flew into the tower were CGI, others say that they witnessed planes going in but that they were not commercial jets and were actually remote controlled air craft by the military/government... Who the fuck am I supposed to believe?
What sort of auto windscreen is reflecting the 'plane impact and explosion'? have you identified the model? It seems very vertical , flat and in two parts, not one piece concave and at the aerodynamic 45 degree angle that might have reflected something occuring behind it.
haha the car wasnt even close enough let alone us being able to see like perfectly like that lol its all setup the tower and background looks like a screen
By the way, the reflection is the ultimate proof that it was genuine. Why would they build in a fake reflection? It's obvious that there is some angle at which this could reflect. Are you a physicist? If not, why pretend to know about light, reflection, laws of optics and physics?
@gusemcontra Watch it again. The image in the reflection did not move with the sway of the camera when the person holding the camera moved left and right. The reflection just stood stationary, which is impossible. In the real world, the image in the reflection would have moved WITH the sway of the camera. Not only that, but the image itself was cut and pasted "upside down", that is why he was pointing towards the black shadow that runs along the center of the plane, as well as the explosion....
@StreetLethalRacing I'm sorry, but as usual with CTs, you latch onto minutae detail, which you cannot explain (I cannot either, but then I'm not a physicist and neither are you or the filmmaker) and from this you proclaim it all to be a hoax (one minor detail, which when shown to experts would surely have an explanation otherwise, I'm sure, the tens of thousands of professional and academic physicists would have picked up on this).
@StreetLethalRacing In the end, planes flew in and there is no shred of evidence to suggest otherwise. 99.9% of experts agree. Look, I detest the Bush gov't and my own (Britain), but there is no way such a conspiracy could be carried off, there are thousands of eye witnesses, video footage, academic and professional analyses (check academic articles) - all these would have to be in the know. In any case, almost all CT objections have been rebuffed by experts. Talk to a prof about the reflection.
@gusemcontra Eyewitness accounts varied, some said missile, some said small plane w/no windows, and others said large passenger plane. At 9:13 in this video you can clearly see a Boeing being superimposed over a missle, SImon clearly points that out. Do you actually deny seeing that mysterious plane that was filmed flying away from the Towers after the 2nd impact happened? Why was that plane there? Why did it pull away....?
You would think they would have done a better job with their animations with all the time they had to prepare this. Too bad that the people they hired to pull this off were freakin idiots and horrible actors..
I would like to say that I have been wrong all this time for thinking it was airplanes. I have now been shown irrefutable evidence to the contrary. You can either go through life clinging to your ego, or you can exchange it for the truth. It is up to you. However, one thing has always remained true through out time - The more you know, the wiser you are, the more ridicule you stand to face. It is easy to live in a world by the opinions of others, but it is much harder to live by your own.
one thing i dont get is that if all the plane images are fake , but then hadnt 2 planes actually hit the WTC?why would they make fake CGI imagery of planes then? also, if there really was no plane hit, then so many people who were standing outside watching, didnt they notice that..there was no plane?
@Nabilz31 not real people....dummies and photoshop...think about it...ever talk to anyone there...no? ... thought not...me neither because they don't exist. And what happened to the planes...and the people....didn't exist. Naw..I'm joshin' ya.
did u know the bomb exploded in a muslim majority floor? explain that u dumb atheists. or simple expose ure self as liars. by the way, notice how newschannel reports are brainwashing audience. look at how the lady emphasizes on the word ' plane ' ' hitting ' and see her hand movement, trying to make us remeember. morever, the guy says '' everyone knows now '' whose everyone??
excellent. but it says in Quran, " UNBELIEVERS aka the dear american agnostics are gonna keep denying because they WANT to rebel against Islam. Try it. Tell an agnostic that " no one is perfect " and he is even gonna deny that very statement by coming up with some bullshit mixture of words from his twisted mind " aaanhh how can u say no ones perfect? perfection is defined by blablalblalbla " like they just dont wonna agree or believe even the simplest of thing..
6:25...you can see smoke at the bottom of first tower hit, why is there smoke clinging to the building at the bottom? More proof of secondary explosions happening down below. Where are all the debunkers on these vids? They ignore them for a reason.
If anyone has read Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. My "blink" moment about this horrific hoax is the Fairbanks video. When I watch it in real time, it simply looks fake. Something is just not right about it. Of course, Simon dissects it like a heart surgeon, but I can tell anyone that video is a doctored phony.
um...excuse me, mr.internet? if this is so obviously true, then wtf are the american people doing? if so many of these images are doctored...um...then obviously something ELSE happened...and the evidence is extreme...extreme. like, colliding chuck norris's fist into a black hole. yea, that extreme. this evidence is extremely obvious, i am quite nervous, wtf are the people of NY doing?
WHY DOES THIS NOT HAVE 99,000,000 VIEWS? FOR CHRISTS SAKES KITTENS PLAYING WITH YARN HAVE MORE VIEWS :/
I like how you emphasised the way the whole building just consumes the plane with no parts flying off, I don't even need more information than to that to realise its fake as fuck...how could you possibly think a steel framed building like that would just take in the whole plane with some delayed explosion after it and only begans to explode once the whole plane has cleanly inserted it ¬_¬. Brilliant Vid, have read the september clues too, very convincing...I'll be sure to pass this info on
@TheDivineFortress yeah...I liked it too...and how come it took too long for the plane to come out the other side. And why was the tire in such great shape that was on the sidewalk by the fake people. Naw...I'm joshin'ya. I'm hired by govt. to debunk the debunkers.
At 04:28, I think it's very strange that it reflects the entry hole and the fire ball, but I just can't because at where it's reflecting is pointing out from the towers and it's impossible to make that happend, that is just not realistic. And the place where it's reflecting is not directed in any way that it's possible something behind the reflection point can be reflected at that point, that is just impossible.
Camos do you have theory to disprove Simon with the scientific method or are you just another douche that says "epic fail" who tragically was not in the Trade Center that day?
@CamosIOI Nice attitude, you are right as to the lacking of height of my tree, but I accounted for the height difference using a little thing I learned in that physics course I took at college, called Pythagoras' theorem. This same equation would help you see the incidence for the reflection is off. Many have noticed this and have come to some different theories to how this could be.
I am not so sure, but to account for this reflection the windshield would have to be off a Lamborghini, not an SUV.
Evan also lied about the sound being off. There is pre and post video all with sound, this clip was OK'ed by the FBI before release. There is many many odd facts surrounding a lot of the footage. And the physics is the main part.
At the end of the page on that link is a great line, about the lack of a caveat to Newton's Third Law
evan fairbanks - what happened to him? does he have any other footage? if not how does he credit himself with being a cameraman? a real reporter cameraman would stick around and shoot more footage, where is his?
7:09 no motion blur what so ever. I've always hated how fast moving objects are blurry when you freeze video but I have no complaints here. I don't know brand of camera that dude was using. It would be nice for tennis or cricket matches. We could tell exactly where the ball is! :D
@simonshack Oh but sweetheart, I have watched at least a dozen of your videos, and plan to watch more if they are on here! :) Have a grand evening! And thanks again for all you have done. God Bless you! :)
so you try telling every victim of 911 family's those bright lines across the building at 09:59 arent support beams meant to stop a general collapse of the top section of the building these support beams hold at least 3 times the top sections weight but as the plane was flying at such speeds with such temperatures burning the beams that are meant to support the top section they just melt away and eventually collapse government terrorist or whatever people died that day always remember that RIP
@CamosIOI Excellent. I need to believe in the planes and the basics of the official 9/11 story, and that the mass media is an army of independent, inquisitive and courageous journalists investigating the powerful bodies of society, rather than a coordinated war and high-finance marketing platform. Where's your evidence that simonshack is wrong on all these counts, and can you supply names of the aggressive witnesses you mention?
Defintively no planes involved. 2 Tomahawks plus explosive devices into WTC 1 and 2, only explosives devices in WTC 7, only a Tomahawk into the Pentagon, only MK bomb in Shanksville. No Al Qaida members involved in this terrorist attack. The real terrorists are the author of "Project for the New American Century". That document explain all the reasons for this crime.
I would like to add that the camera position of the Evan Fairbanks shot have been investigated, and it is out on the street. You must block traffic and arrange an elevated platform if you actually wish to take the shot.
The truth being uncovered will certainely lead the country into political chaos and civil disorder. As the past, present and future credibility of the once most powerful nation crumbles to dust...
So we have 2 choices:
Willingfull ignorance and perpetual denial
Or stability threatening disorder, and life-lasting national shame
@Barnakos well we shouldn't be ashamed for exposing the truth. Those who perpetrated this horrendous crime should be ashamed. Personally, I would take some social disorder rather than the shame I would feel for not speaking out.
this shit is genius. taboo, amateur, CP, octopus, September Clues. I am entering my Masters degree program in 3 weeks, in Heritage Studies. I will be incorporating npt in my studies.
3000 people blown to dust particles, 4000 Israelis do not show up for work, i say hang everone involved in this period. ps. what is in the guys hand as he moves back? he has a remote control in his hand!!
It should be clear by now that nowhere near 3000 people died on 9/11. It was a simulated, fictional TV 'news' event to cover up the WTC demolitions. Given the evidence now at hand, there is no logic in believing 3000 brokers/bankers/insurance people were targeted and killed by this false-flag attack. It was just a gigantic money-making scheme for all involved.
the people that are doing this all should be made extinct. we know from the physics alone that this is all a hoax.they blew 3ooo people to dust paricles. and the ama tuer' is in another dimention.
There are no details to be told. Is either you saw it or you did not. I indeed saw it, thats all. i saw the plane hit the tower, so did my mother, my father and my cousin, who were with me at the moment. All this "no plane" nonsense is just flagrant campaign to discredit and make truthers look like a bunch of nutjobs.
Ok, nicevidbro. I can only add you to my long list of anonymous people who say the "saw it all with their own eyes" but - inexplicably - refuse to elaborate and provide more details of what they saw. In case you should reconsider and come back with more details, I would like to hear (from all 4 of you):
nicevidbro, were you visiting from the UK on 9/11?
You say; "I saw the plane hit the tower" that implies you and your family saw 1 plane. which plane, 1 or 2? And it isn't to discredit "Truthers" they want answers as well. They just aren't arguing over what hit the towers as much as they want the truth of what happened that day. Clearly what we were told, and the truth, are two totally different things. I was there also. It happened so fast, explosions are what I saw and heard. Multiple times.
My favourite is by far the "bent plane" that you start analyzing at 7:00... Seriously, the fuselage appears to be bent in the middle at a 10 degree angle... there's so many things wrong with that shot that it isn't funny...
By the way Simon, I assume you've noticed this, but since you don't address it in your video, I thought I'd mention it... In the Tina Cart video, the explosion casts an utterly and obviously impossible shadow in WTC 1... When it first shades WTC 1, there is a round bit of shadow above a line of shadow, even though the explosion is a round bit with a "line" in front of it rather than below it...
Additionally, the shadow of this line remains solid even though the piece of debris that seems to be casting it appears to seperate from the main explosion... This even though a second piece of debris then shoots out from the explosion above the first piece of debris, casting a shadow that correctly has a gap...
there is no reason to be shooting that angle - there is nothing happening up there before the impact - is he clairvoyant? Or was it his 'instinct' to try and film up that guy's nose? And there is no way that he heard an incoming and happened to frame this shot - the 'plane' would be moving way too fast
Nothing happening???? Are you serious??? What about the other tower on fire? And BTW, the sound of the other plane approaching was hearable way before it actually hit the tower.
"Did a missile hit the south tower? just wondering". Watch a few videos of a JASSM missile in action. Note that this weapon looks just like a small plane. Also note how this weapon will penetrate concrete and steel and THEN explode. Now watch this hits on the towers. The "airliners" pentetrate the towers and THEN explode. Compare the videos and tell me, were JASSM bunker buster missiles used on 9/11? I tend to think they were.
This is maybe my 3rd time watching 911 amateur and I never notice what you was pointing out at 9:14! I thought you meant the whole plane. That really blew my mind! I also respect the fact you didn't come and say what it really looked like, you let the viewers make their own decision.
Let me start by saying I believed 911 was a inside job since 2006 by watching vids like loose change,911 mysteries, 911 inside out pilots, etc..but I always thought no plane theory was bs, or maybe I was to scared to believe my government could be that evil. After watching your vids I am convinced, ashamed,angerd, and sad! Thank you.
Some points to ponder: 1) why doesn't ANY MSM show these obvious flaws? 2) Doesn't anybody in MSM/US Intelligence grasp the implications of the hoax?
IMHO there must be a great fear of looking foolish once a person rises high in the system. They are afraid to say that the emperor has no clothes. Even Ron Paul, when confronted with 9/11 Truth in the debates, did not speak out.
When I see planes melt, shot from non-existent POVs, it's obviously faked. Isn't that logical?
Finally, someone came up with some good evidence. I hope that most American brainwashed citizens see this and finally face the fact that America and half the world is just a big set-up for something which is comming up.
Is it that these CGI & 3D Gaffs were done deliberately and left as clues to try and datamine out who is smart enough to figure them out. I wouldn't be and I'm a 9/11 investigator. They have left clear and deliberate evidence of forgery like the reflection of Airliner impact with WTC2 in Car Window of vehicle close to photographer the actual Explosion being above and WAY behind. The 'individuals' involved in these wicked and sinister events have used stacked layers of deceptive techiniques ?
I watched your whole series, September Clues, the Epilogue, and now this 3 part series, still a tad skeptical, but the information scared me, because it's so convincing...
But then when you pointed out the reflection in this video, that did it... that was the last straw... there is no way that car could have that reflection in the window... no f'n way...
Good Eye simon .. I pointed the windshield out to the TV Fakery people and they said they saw nothing ... This video is a blatant forgery ... Great Job Man !
this video always bothered me. fairbanks is a fraud, as is his video. the guy in the video never hears the "plane" above him?? it was a missle. plus, the whole reflection of the impact in the car winshield is fake. and why in these videos the "plane" is shown is clear sunlight, but all the tv coverage the plane appears like a black shadow?
In retrospect, I agree : I could have left that one out - had I chosen to avoid easy criticism...However, please stop the video at 3:17. What is that 'blob' pasted over the man's eye - and successively 'popping out' of it ? One possible answer to this could be that this man participated in this forged video on the condition that he was assured zero risk of being identified in any future, forensic analysis of the original, high -definition footage.
"Truthers" are always asking questions and looking for the real truth. You have to pose the questions and, especially in this case, there is nothing i wouldn't explore. I didn't believe any of this a year ago. I have seen too much evidence and no one in the government or media wants us to find out the truth. The enemy is a liar and only the Lord holds our hope for a future with Him. God bless.
I'm a truth, but not a no planer. Could there have been missiles strapped to the planes, sure.
But really with the windshield. Why even bother going though all that trouble if it's a fkae clip. Whoever made it could have left it out and no one woulda been the wiser.
I'm glad you've realized finally thats a normal radio, and a car antenae, and a windshield. About time :p
Nola : I posted this update of "911AMATEUR part3" in february 2008 ...shortly after the first version which I promptly deleted.
I'd say it's "about time" that you found it ! :O)
About the windshield : you should know I have several different versions of this clip(from various TVbroadcasts) and MOST of them are cropped so as to cut out the lower part of the shot (the WINDSHIELD's not seen). You're free to believe that's just a honest 'accident' - I do not : IMHOsomeone didn't ...like it !
For anyone that watched this live which has 20/16 vision, the tampering was completely obvious. That third of a second thing. Ah ha ha ha I saw the same shit in the last couple of months too! Now that the digital switch is coming through it'll be even better. Or just less obvious. NPFTM/KMFDM
yeah only problem is that its from a VHS camcorder and i cant put it into my computer and send it to you, even if i could i know you'd try to prove it fake which would be very insulting considering it isnt
they were planes not missiles idiots. so..say it was not planes...how did all the people on those flights die? did they just disappear? and was that plane crash in penn just a coincidince?? think idiot
Whats strange is the plane doesn't seem to be impacting on anything, rather it seems to be flying through the tower as if its not there. Doesn't make any sense to me, the wings would have sheared or buckled, and the front nose of the plane would have impacted first so that at least part of the back end of the plane would have come falling down the outer part of the building. Also does anyone actually see the nose of the plane apparently stop at the end of the explosion but totally intact?
these videos are closest thing ive seen in regards to evidence, i believ the general theory of really bad shit going down that day that had nttin to do with islamics but this is dynamite...
They didnt. Muslims are not the enemy, never have never been never will be. They are to the american people simply because the government, along with Israel and other nations, sold it that way. The real terrorists are in the government and the crooked banker elites around the world.
gee100, You pose an excellent question. The Fairbanks video was shot from an unnaturally low level. Why? Here's my 2 cents: Contrary to what Shack suggest in this youtube, the reflection in the windshield is not impossible. It actually depicts the correct view of the WTC. The perps wanted that low angle, precisely so they could add a fake reflection of the fake plane for extra authenticity. The perps are very tricky!
SEPTEMBER CLUES makes the most since.
erasesure 1 week ago
After three years of investigation, my thought: the planes was TOTALLY REAL: the first plane was a small jet, the second plane was a Big military grey plane.
Inigo37 1 month ago
@Inigo37 did you WATCH the video? lol what /plane/, what /jet/? was it the fairweather wing? the soundless ufo melding with the confused (and oftentimes), faceless building? that big, grey honker musta disintegrated, huh?
boywonderless 1 month ago
Evan left his camera on the floor or similar pointing up at the WTC. Easy enough to find if you look for it. As for the majority of the video, why is it 7 years after the incident Americans STILL don't know what artifacts are? Has Google truly censored the US, banning it from Wiki's Compression_artifact page?
MitkoChan 2 months ago
@MitkoChan
"7 years after"? LOL. Are you an artifact yourself? :-D
simonshack 2 months ago
@simonshack No, but I can count. This video was posted 3 years ago, you fuckin' dimwit.
MitkoChan 2 months ago
No planes, mister haines.
We were fooled, felt like a fool, used as a tool, to start Bushes war, wars.
fantasy as Star Wars. George Bush, george Lucas, George suckers.
hha
Str8Against1njustice 3 months ago
I think 33 people don't even try to open their eyes even after watching a good work.
jasminhotel 3 months ago
you know what else is unrealistic? that people who are against the truthers would come to this video and camp out, waiting to troll comments. If you so vehemently don't believe 911 was faked, what is your motive to even watch this video? To get mad and reply to anonymous people? I don't buy it.
edyken77 4 months ago
@edyken77 damn...you caught on...we are hired by govt. to try to shoot down these efforts you make to show what really...I mean ...to show what you say happened. Hope I didn't lose my job for letting the cat out of the bag. By the way...your work...fabulous!
yikesoyikes1 1 month ago
i think here is the original video from the 2nd video of this clip (Luc Courchesne).
The plane looks very different - more like a missile
watch?v=cTiDldD1gmM
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
i wish all these people involved in this crime will be arrested as soon as possible
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
At 6:41 the fireball turns purple...
Color balance issues?
Naderath 5 months ago
Is Evan lying down on his back in the middle of the street in order to take this video? And where is the audio? He's been a "cameraman for 16 yrs" and doesn't have audio on his wide angle camera?
And the fact that this guy shows no "reaction" until the tower EXPLODES is very telling. He shows no signs of HEARING a PLANE APPROACHING DIRECTLY ABOVE HIS HEAD!
The "windshield reflection" seems WRONG!--It is too far away from the tower&facing in the wrong direction. How could it reflect the "plane"?
lucymo1000 6 months ago
I've heart the dumbest persons talking about ghost sightings, that aliens are landed and that the moonlanding was fake. I never believed one of them but this time it's different. Simon opened my eyes on the real story behind 9/11.
I am sure that this is all faked.
Holzkohlen666 6 months ago
Yer 3 for 3 on the video fakery...
JimBoCycle 7 months ago
@simonshack I'm not the one making the claims in YOUR video Simes - let's hear it. It's easy for guys like you to carp from the sidelines which you're doing a fine job on incidentally, but let's hear it. What back up have you got for your claims? Any peer reviewed stuff or just your opinions? Ah, right, okay. Move on everyone, nothing to see here - just another guy who thinks it was a stitch up. Move on, move on...etc. Oh - thanks!
motornut2001 7 months ago
Love the comment at 5.24 - "whoever forged this shot had no notion of physics". So tell me Simon, are you a physicist? So many claims, made so authoratatively and yet completely bereft of any independent peer reviewed critique beyond the poster's opinion. I imagine much of this is video is a collection of images and statements of the owner's opinions and not a whole lot more. Conjecture, no more, no less.
motornut2001 7 months ago
@motornut2001
Well, at least I know how to spell "authoritatively" :o)
If you are a physicist yourself, you are welcome to explain what we see in the 9/11 videos - featuring aluminum airplanes melding into steel structures without a single piece of wing appendage - not even a slice of an aft aileron - shearing off on impact. All we see is a plane disappearing inside the WTC as if he building was made out of Jell-O.
So tell me now, Mr Motornut: what is your definition of 'conjecture'?
simonshack 6 months ago 6
@simonshack I'm not a physicist, but I don't think you are either. You might ask someone who can can speak with experience re: impact analysis, motion, etc. and not a bunch of guys on the internet saying "hey, that don't look right!". So far, all you've continued to offer is just that. I'm not suggesting I can provide the answers for you, just I don't buy your line of questioning. Good luck with the spelling bee by the bye...
motornut2001 3 months ago
@simonshack I think one of them would be watching your videos and others like them. Essentially "I think this must have happened" even when more experienced and qualified persons could or have established this. Sorry for the late reply, I have a life.
motornut2001 3 months ago
@simonshack you are just so full of shit....you've wasted so much energy on trying to make this thing fit your theory. Ever see "Cops" where the bad guy runs the stolen corvette into the back of a semi @ over 100 mph. The car is cut in half and there is the driver sitting on the ground. Well, now we know it's faked. You are just so full mof shit.
yikesoyikes1 1 month ago
My parents have had me reffered to a shrink because of my ability to see the truth .. #LOL
edshot87 8 months ago
which buildings are behind the camera, it could be a facade that reflects and then on the windshield?
74pbg 8 months ago
Even if i am a conspiracy supporter, as a major broadcast cameraman i must tell you that every broadcast eng camera had a very high resolutiton b/w viewfinder whith analogic detail enancement for focus control and yes, you see mor clear than the master analogic tape because the signal is taked before the recording.
Best regards, Marco
AllarmeRadioLondra 10 months ago
@simonshack sorry for the late reply lol whats the catch man this isnt going to be any of that chatroulette funny business right? lmao
latinluigi 10 months ago
There's something veeery wrong with this footage: The reflex of the object! Simple: The angle of a windshield would really reflect a object, but only if the object were ABOVE! So, to reflect the plane/object/missile, the must be below the tower. Totally below!
BTW, great work!
kombinatti 10 months ago
it's so obvious but it's totally unbelievable to the countless millions of you already brainwashed by tv . so to all the skeptics and dis-informers and non-believers out there , maybe you should open your little minds and awake from your deep sleep . and don't underestimate the powers of the dark side . seek the truth . God bless all those affected by 9-11 and to everyone involved in making the real truth be known . Next chapter for NWO , aliens ! stay alert . may the force be with you .
stevengreen775 11 months ago
Its all about maintaining the NWO. and the dollars and cents
lavidaspeligrosa 11 months ago
i don`t find a reason to do this ...but good job ...
WAWETAMALCREADITO 1 year ago
This is too cruel to be true. I don't understand....why? How could the US government be so cruel????????????? This is.....this is too much......this work of beyond evil. Is just pure demonic. I still don't understand. Why US government, WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO YOUR OWN PEOPLE! What sick reason you have for this???!! Oil? Money? Jews? WHY!!??
sephirothrikusora 1 year ago 2
I like the shot where the camera man spends a couple of seconds on the shot. Don't want to waste a lot of tape on this.
RealityControl4 1 year ago
I don't fucking understand anymore I totally agree that 9/11 was an inside job but what the hell is up with all the different theories? Some people say the planes that flew into the tower were CGI, others say that they witnessed planes going in but that they were not commercial jets and were actually remote controlled air craft by the military/government... Who the fuck am I supposed to believe?
latinluigi 1 year ago 2
What sort of auto windscreen is reflecting the 'plane impact and explosion'? have you identified the model? It seems very vertical , flat and in two parts, not one piece concave and at the aerodynamic 45 degree angle that might have reflected something occuring behind it.
MarkB1ngham 1 year ago
Thanks dude, GREAT job!
freitasnetuno 1 year ago
haha the car wasnt even close enough let alone us being able to see like perfectly like that lol its all setup the tower and background looks like a screen
boskey10 1 year ago
By the way, the reflection is the ultimate proof that it was genuine. Why would they build in a fake reflection? It's obvious that there is some angle at which this could reflect. Are you a physicist? If not, why pretend to know about light, reflection, laws of optics and physics?
gusemcontra 1 year ago
@gusemcontra Watch it again. The image in the reflection did not move with the sway of the camera when the person holding the camera moved left and right. The reflection just stood stationary, which is impossible. In the real world, the image in the reflection would have moved WITH the sway of the camera. Not only that, but the image itself was cut and pasted "upside down", that is why he was pointing towards the black shadow that runs along the center of the plane, as well as the explosion....
StreetLethalRacing 1 year ago
@StreetLethalRacing I'm sorry, but as usual with CTs, you latch onto minutae detail, which you cannot explain (I cannot either, but then I'm not a physicist and neither are you or the filmmaker) and from this you proclaim it all to be a hoax (one minor detail, which when shown to experts would surely have an explanation otherwise, I'm sure, the tens of thousands of professional and academic physicists would have picked up on this).
gusemcontra 1 year ago
@StreetLethalRacing In the end, planes flew in and there is no shred of evidence to suggest otherwise. 99.9% of experts agree. Look, I detest the Bush gov't and my own (Britain), but there is no way such a conspiracy could be carried off, there are thousands of eye witnesses, video footage, academic and professional analyses (check academic articles) - all these would have to be in the know. In any case, almost all CT objections have been rebuffed by experts. Talk to a prof about the reflection.
gusemcontra 1 year ago
@gusemcontra
Indeed - so "99.9% of experts" agree? Hmmm....ok then, folks - nothing to see here, move on !
And slam that remaining 0,1% in jail ! :-D
simonshack 1 year ago
Comment removed
StreetLethalRacing 1 year ago
@gusemcontra Eyewitness accounts varied, some said missile, some said small plane w/no windows, and others said large passenger plane. At 9:13 in this video you can clearly see a Boeing being superimposed over a missle, SImon clearly points that out. Do you actually deny seeing that mysterious plane that was filmed flying away from the Towers after the 2nd impact happened? Why was that plane there? Why did it pull away....?
watch?v=vgJxhgFtDQo
StreetLethalRacing 1 year ago
I'm not quite sure what this video is 'proving'. There is nothing in this to suggest a conspiracy of the magnitude 9/11 conspiracists suggest.
gusemcontra 1 year ago
You would think they would have done a better job with their animations with all the time they had to prepare this. Too bad that the people they hired to pull this off were freakin idiots and horrible actors..
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
8:26 its the all seeing building
Dave7689 1 year ago
I would like to say that I have been wrong all this time for thinking it was airplanes. I have now been shown irrefutable evidence to the contrary. You can either go through life clinging to your ego, or you can exchange it for the truth. It is up to you. However, one thing has always remained true through out time - The more you know, the wiser you are, the more ridicule you stand to face. It is easy to live in a world by the opinions of others, but it is much harder to live by your own.
emerson24 1 year ago
one thing i dont get is that if all the plane images are fake , but then hadnt 2 planes actually hit the WTC?why would they make fake CGI imagery of planes then? also, if there really was no plane hit, then so many people who were standing outside watching, didnt they notice that..there was no plane?
Nabilz31 1 year ago
@Nabilz31 No one is really sure what hit it now. It couldve been a misille or a military plane. The witnesses saw SMALL planes. Most of them.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar Small planes can be mistaken for missiles mostly
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar The witnesses are paid actors, it is sure what didn't hit them. No plane, but an internal explosion.
0Beautifulbrutality0 1 year ago
@Nabilz31 not real people....dummies and photoshop...think about it...ever talk to anyone there...no? ... thought not...me neither because they don't exist. And what happened to the planes...and the people....didn't exist. Naw..I'm joshin' ya.
yikesoyikes1 1 month ago
did u know the bomb exploded in a muslim majority floor? explain that u dumb atheists. or simple expose ure self as liars. by the way, notice how newschannel reports are brainwashing audience. look at how the lady emphasizes on the word ' plane ' ' hitting ' and see her hand movement, trying to make us remeember. morever, the guy says '' everyone knows now '' whose everyone??
Nabilz31 1 year ago
excellent. but it says in Quran, " UNBELIEVERS aka the dear american agnostics are gonna keep denying because they WANT to rebel against Islam. Try it. Tell an agnostic that " no one is perfect " and he is even gonna deny that very statement by coming up with some bullshit mixture of words from his twisted mind " aaanhh how can u say no ones perfect? perfection is defined by blablalblalbla " like they just dont wonna agree or believe even the simplest of thing..
Nabilz31 1 year ago
6:25...you can see smoke at the bottom of first tower hit, why is there smoke clinging to the building at the bottom? More proof of secondary explosions happening down below. Where are all the debunkers on these vids? They ignore them for a reason.
blite13 1 year ago
right can someone explain to me what is reflecting the actual hit at the bottom of the screen? is it a car or window or something
lonewolf2379 1 year ago
@lonewolf2379 Car window.
0Beautifulbrutality0 1 year ago
If anyone has read Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. My "blink" moment about this horrific hoax is the Fairbanks video. When I watch it in real time, it simply looks fake. Something is just not right about it. Of course, Simon dissects it like a heart surgeon, but I can tell anyone that video is a doctored phony.
inova11901 1 year ago
um...excuse me, mr.internet? if this is so obviously true, then wtf are the american people doing? if so many of these images are doctored...um...then obviously something ELSE happened...and the evidence is extreme...extreme. like, colliding chuck norris's fist into a black hole. yea, that extreme. this evidence is extremely obvious, i am quite nervous, wtf are the people of NY doing?
WHY DOES THIS NOT HAVE 99,000,000 VIEWS? FOR CHRISTS SAKES KITTENS PLAYING WITH YARN HAVE MORE VIEWS :/
Vince13192 1 year ago 2
@Vince13192 because americans are dumbshit assholes wearing pink glasses and letting the influence of brainwashing!!
Nabilz31 1 year ago
@Nabilz31 Please don't generalize. Most americans are idiots, but some know the truth and are trying to expose it.
0Beautifulbrutality0 1 year ago
@Vince13192 This doesn't have 99,000,000 views because most people either rather watch Porn or Oprah. People are being brainwashed by TV.
donguinto 1 year ago 2
I like how you emphasised the way the whole building just consumes the plane with no parts flying off, I don't even need more information than to that to realise its fake as fuck...how could you possibly think a steel framed building like that would just take in the whole plane with some delayed explosion after it and only begans to explode once the whole plane has cleanly inserted it ¬_¬. Brilliant Vid, have read the september clues too, very convincing...I'll be sure to pass this info on
TheDivineFortress 1 year ago
@TheDivineFortress yeah...I liked it too...and how come it took too long for the plane to come out the other side. And why was the tire in such great shape that was on the sidewalk by the fake people. Naw...I'm joshin'ya. I'm hired by govt. to debunk the debunkers.
yikesoyikes1 1 month ago
At 04:28, I think it's very strange that it reflects the entry hole and the fire ball, but I just can't because at where it's reflecting is pointing out from the towers and it's impossible to make that happend, that is just not realistic. And the place where it's reflecting is not directed in any way that it's possible something behind the reflection point can be reflected at that point, that is just impossible.
Great video ! And you have great videos.
rsredfunk 1 year ago
Camos do you have theory to disprove Simon with the scientific method or are you just another douche that says "epic fail" who tragically was not in the Trade Center that day?
losdodgers420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CamosIOI Nice attitude, you are right as to the lacking of height of my tree, but I accounted for the height difference using a little thing I learned in that physics course I took at college, called Pythagoras' theorem. This same equation would help you see the incidence for the reflection is off. Many have noticed this and have come to some different theories to how this could be.
911logic.blogspot.com/2007/05/evan-fairbanks-theory-under(DOT)html
figures it is a monitor
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
I am not so sure, but to account for this reflection the windshield would have to be off a Lamborghini, not an SUV.
Evan also lied about the sound being off. There is pre and post video all with sound, this clip was OK'ed by the FBI before release. There is many many odd facts surrounding a lot of the footage. And the physics is the main part.
At the end of the page on that link is a great line, about the lack of a caveat to Newton's Third Law
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@brs320 flimsy four posted frame???? you need to read/watch about the construction of these towers before you make moronic comments.
/watch?v=BjXU-yCDyOY
/watch?v=hyGWbDsXW_o
one can easily see the exoskeleton used on this "new" design for 1972
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
evan fairbanks - what happened to him? does he have any other footage? if not how does he credit himself with being a cameraman? a real reporter cameraman would stick around and shoot more footage, where is his?
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
RIP Peter Jennings ;( Oh yeah, and the people who died on 9/11
brs320 1 year ago
7:09 no motion blur what so ever. I've always hated how fast moving objects are blurry when you freeze video but I have no complaints here. I don't know brand of camera that dude was using. It would be nice for tennis or cricket matches. We could tell exactly where the ball is! :D
Vamavid 1 year ago
Simon, sheer thanks is not enough for what you have brought to us. And you have taught me to have a keener eye...thank you!!!
TexasRose50 1 year ago 22
@TexasRose50
And I thank you for activating that keener eye. We need to be more doing this - please spend a little of your time opening a few more :O)
simonshack 1 year ago 18
@simonshack Oh but sweetheart, I have watched at least a dozen of your videos, and plan to watch more if they are on here! :) Have a grand evening! And thanks again for all you have done. God Bless you! :)
TexasRose50 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so you try telling every victim of 911 family's those bright lines across the building at 09:59 arent support beams meant to stop a general collapse of the top section of the building these support beams hold at least 3 times the top sections weight but as the plane was flying at such speeds with such temperatures burning the beams that are meant to support the top section they just melt away and eventually collapse government terrorist or whatever people died that day always remember that RIP
lfckid94 1 year ago
@CamosIOI Excellent. I need to believe in the planes and the basics of the official 9/11 story, and that the mass media is an army of independent, inquisitive and courageous journalists investigating the powerful bodies of society, rather than a coordinated war and high-finance marketing platform. Where's your evidence that simonshack is wrong on all these counts, and can you supply names of the aggressive witnesses you mention?
sxmadrid 1 year ago
simonshack is on the right track
aifammafiaaifam 1 year ago 3
I always found interesting (and shocking) how the airplane disappears upon crashing in the building. Makes you wonder.......
Duhwuntoono 1 year ago
Defintively no planes involved. 2 Tomahawks plus explosive devices into WTC 1 and 2, only explosives devices in WTC 7, only a Tomahawk into the Pentagon, only MK bomb in Shanksville. No Al Qaida members involved in this terrorist attack. The real terrorists are the author of "Project for the New American Century". That document explain all the reasons for this crime.
turboreattore 2 years ago 4
I would like to add that the camera position of the Evan Fairbanks shot have been investigated, and it is out on the street. You must block traffic and arrange an elevated platform if you actually wish to take the shot.
Tufa911 2 years ago
@Tufa911
I have not seen what kind of camera he shot it with, but couldn't he have shot form that angle using a swiveling screen as most camcorders have?
herzogsbuick 2 years ago
Get real! It is a complete fake! The problem with the LIE is that you cannot make the plane enter the building. Calculate the force for yourself!
Tufa911 2 years ago 4
hold on...so if they weren't actual planes what were they? missiles? holograms? nothing?
omniexistus 2 years ago
omniexistus: If you wish, get familiar with the full research published on my website:
septembercluesDOTinfo
thanks!
simonshack 2 years ago 2
@simonshack
Thanks for the great work...
But... what do we do know?
The truth being uncovered will certainely lead the country into political chaos and civil disorder. As the past, present and future credibility of the once most powerful nation crumbles to dust...
So we have 2 choices:
Willingfull ignorance and perpetual denial
Or stability threatening disorder, and life-lasting national shame
so... what do we do now?
Barnakos 2 years ago
@Barnakos well we shouldn't be ashamed for exposing the truth. Those who perpetrated this horrendous crime should be ashamed. Personally, I would take some social disorder rather than the shame I would feel for not speaking out.
gracistabu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
great vid. did you do that? and can you tell me the song that starts at 9:08?
airbag97 2 years ago
@omniexistus They where missles combined with explosives, that or we just dont know.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
Good job Simonshack. You are making people aware of other possibilities. Looking at this... I dont believe it was a plane.
ravath 2 years ago 5
this shit is genius. taboo, amateur, CP, octopus, September Clues. I am entering my Masters degree program in 3 weeks, in Heritage Studies. I will be incorporating npt in my studies.
mot10001 2 years ago
3000 people blown to dust particles, 4000 Israelis do not show up for work, i say hang everone involved in this period. ps. what is in the guys hand as he moves back? he has a remote control in his hand!!
mikelmagy 2 years ago
Please go to:
SeptemberCluesDOTinfo
It should be clear by now that nowhere near 3000 people died on 9/11. It was a simulated, fictional TV 'news' event to cover up the WTC demolitions. Given the evidence now at hand, there is no logic in believing 3000 brokers/bankers/insurance people were targeted and killed by this false-flag attack. It was just a gigantic money-making scheme for all involved.
simonshack 2 years ago 6
it happened and it is about a NYC phone book full
of violent death sentence crimes. the isrealis were involved, wall street, WH stall, DOD,Corperate America. How many Zionist Isr. people dieded?
do not believe anything...truth is coming.
mikelmagy 2 years ago
isay that we hang them all!!
the people that are doing this all should be made extinct. we know from the physics alone that this is all a hoax.they blew 3ooo people to dust paricles. and the ama tuer' is in another dimention.
mikelmagy 2 years ago
If you watch this vid, at 15 second a missing wing suddenly generates out of nowhere
youtube[d o t]com/watch?v=J3iKLz4oatY
There were no planes at the WTC
lottiesocks 2 years ago 2
Yes, there were, I was there and I saw what happened. Enough with your disinfo nonsense.
nicevidbro 2 years ago
nicevidbro : Would you please describe in detail your personal experience of 9/11 ? Thanks.
simonshack 2 years ago
Hi simonshack:
There are no details to be told. Is either you saw it or you did not. I indeed saw it, thats all. i saw the plane hit the tower, so did my mother, my father and my cousin, who were with me at the moment. All this "no plane" nonsense is just flagrant campaign to discredit and make truthers look like a bunch of nutjobs.
nicevidbro 2 years ago
Ok, nicevidbro. I can only add you to my long list of anonymous people who say the "saw it all with their own eyes" but - inexplicably - refuse to elaborate and provide more details of what they saw. In case you should reconsider and come back with more details, I would like to hear (from all 4 of you):
- which of the 2 events you witnessed
- your location at the time of the sighting
- approx how many seconds the sighting lasted
- the perceived size of the airborne object
Thanks !
simonshack 2 years ago
Funny how you ridicule each person that ays they saw it. Sorry, but it is clear that you cannot argue when you are faced with a real witness.
nicevidbro 2 years ago
nicevidbro, were you visiting from the UK on 9/11?
You say; "I saw the plane hit the tower" that implies you and your family saw 1 plane. which plane, 1 or 2? And it isn't to discredit "Truthers" they want answers as well. They just aren't arguing over what hit the towers as much as they want the truth of what happened that day. Clearly what we were told, and the truth, are two totally different things. I was there also. It happened so fast, explosions are what I saw and heard. Multiple times.
Fogslifted 2 years ago
My favourite is by far the "bent plane" that you start analyzing at 7:00... Seriously, the fuselage appears to be bent in the middle at a 10 degree angle... there's so many things wrong with that shot that it isn't funny...
SirBroadsword 2 years ago 2
By the way Simon, I assume you've noticed this, but since you don't address it in your video, I thought I'd mention it... In the Tina Cart video, the explosion casts an utterly and obviously impossible shadow in WTC 1... When it first shades WTC 1, there is a round bit of shadow above a line of shadow, even though the explosion is a round bit with a "line" in front of it rather than below it...
SirBroadsword 2 years ago
Additionally, the shadow of this line remains solid even though the piece of debris that seems to be casting it appears to seperate from the main explosion... This even though a second piece of debris then shoots out from the explosion above the first piece of debris, casting a shadow that correctly has a gap...
SirBroadsword 2 years ago
there is no reason to be shooting that angle - there is nothing happening up there before the impact - is he clairvoyant? Or was it his 'instinct' to try and film up that guy's nose? And there is no way that he heard an incoming and happened to frame this shot - the 'plane' would be moving way too fast
mooners40 2 years ago
Nothing happening???? Are you serious??? What about the other tower on fire? And BTW, the sound of the other plane approaching was hearable way before it actually hit the tower.
reezlaw 2 years ago
Comment removed
mooners40 2 years ago 3
Did a missile hit the south tower? just wondering.
Phoenixhunter08 2 years ago
"Did a missile hit the south tower? just wondering". Watch a few videos of a JASSM missile in action. Note that this weapon looks just like a small plane. Also note how this weapon will penetrate concrete and steel and THEN explode. Now watch this hits on the towers. The "airliners" pentetrate the towers and THEN explode. Compare the videos and tell me, were JASSM bunker buster missiles used on 9/11? I tend to think they were.
lmfecher 2 years ago 3
What a good video!
ravath 2 years ago 4
rite on!!! i like the part which shows the guy with the plane over his head and a Remote in his hand. the plane crossing in front of the glass.
mikelmagy 2 years ago
You hear the kid crying and the father( I assume it is the father) go like " Don't touch it....
Touch what?
Its as if the kid hurt herself?
sidar87 2 years ago
This is maybe my 3rd time watching 911 amateur and I never notice what you was pointing out at 9:14! I thought you meant the whole plane. That really blew my mind! I also respect the fact you didn't come and say what it really looked like, you let the viewers make their own decision.
gunman1977 2 years ago 5
Let me start by saying I believed 911 was a inside job since 2006 by watching vids like loose change,911 mysteries, 911 inside out pilots, etc..but I always thought no plane theory was bs, or maybe I was to scared to believe my government could be that evil. After watching your vids I am convinced, ashamed,angerd, and sad! Thank you.
gunman1977 2 years ago 39
@gunman1977 I've got some properties I'd like to sell you in Detroit. Great neighborhood...super schools...friendly people ....you'll love it
yikesoyikes1 1 month ago
It does not seem very likely that Aluminum wings can pierce through that building.
runescapezhao 2 years ago 4
Thanks for your sensible comment :O)
simonshack 2 years ago
Some points to ponder: 1) why doesn't ANY MSM show these obvious flaws? 2) Doesn't anybody in MSM/US Intelligence grasp the implications of the hoax?
IMHO there must be a great fear of looking foolish once a person rises high in the system. They are afraid to say that the emperor has no clothes. Even Ron Paul, when confronted with 9/11 Truth in the debates, did not speak out.
When I see planes melt, shot from non-existent POVs, it's obviously faked. Isn't that logical?
ChristopherMarlowe 2 years ago 3
Finally, someone came up with some good evidence. I hope that most American brainwashed citizens see this and finally face the fact that America and half the world is just a big set-up for something which is comming up.
hietsjot 2 years ago 3
instinct... hell yeah...
timingfunk 2 years ago 2
didnt understood right,in some parts but well good that there are NON stupid people :=)
Earthbound64 2 years ago
a while ago, i noticed something
after the first hit, the camera's were rolling, most - if not all - aiming at the tower that wasn't yet hit...
why!?
Brutus2 2 years ago 3
Brutus2: all plane footage was fake. They HAD to use the untouched skyscraper. Check out the whole 'September Clues' series.
timingfunk 2 years ago 3
Is it that these CGI & 3D Gaffs were done deliberately and left as clues to try and datamine out who is smart enough to figure them out. I wouldn't be and I'm a 9/11 investigator. They have left clear and deliberate evidence of forgery like the reflection of Airliner impact with WTC2 in Car Window of vehicle close to photographer the actual Explosion being above and WAY behind. The 'individuals' involved in these wicked and sinister events have used stacked layers of deceptive techiniques ?
URNotMyFellowDJ 2 years ago 3
I've noticed this question has come up a lot lately. I'm curious what people think the purpose of datamining out the sharper observers would be
andastroz 2 years ago
Great job Simon ! I hope the fake people who froged WTC planes won`t frog your sucide ur someting. Keep on snifing!!
unboot 2 years ago
I watched your whole series, September Clues, the Epilogue, and now this 3 part series, still a tad skeptical, but the information scared me, because it's so convincing...
But then when you pointed out the reflection in this video, that did it... that was the last straw... there is no way that car could have that reflection in the window... no f'n way...
AGentertainment 2 years ago 22
very good young padawan
dontcensormebro 2 years ago
Iris Concealment @ 03:05
OzzybanOswald 2 years ago
Good Eye simon .. I pointed the windshield out to the TV Fakery people and they said they saw nothing ... This video is a blatant forgery ... Great Job Man !
HoRuSHoRiZoN 2 years ago 3
..also, how does the left "wing" disappear in some of these "home videoes"?
lauradtown 2 years ago 2
this video always bothered me. fairbanks is a fraud, as is his video. the guy in the video never hears the "plane" above him?? it was a missle. plus, the whole reflection of the impact in the car winshield is fake. and why in these videos the "plane" is shown is clear sunlight, but all the tv coverage the plane appears like a black shadow?
lauradtown 2 years ago 3
Excellent comment, thanks.
simonshack 2 years ago
Excellent. But I don't understand the "iris recognition" part.
victordrazen2 2 years ago
In retrospect, I agree : I could have left that one out - had I chosen to avoid easy criticism...However, please stop the video at 3:17. What is that 'blob' pasted over the man's eye - and successively 'popping out' of it ? One possible answer to this could be that this man participated in this forged video on the condition that he was assured zero risk of being identified in any future, forensic analysis of the original, high -definition footage.
simonshack 2 years ago
"Truthers" are always asking questions and looking for the real truth. You have to pose the questions and, especially in this case, there is nothing i wouldn't explore. I didn't believe any of this a year ago. I have seen too much evidence and no one in the government or media wants us to find out the truth. The enemy is a liar and only the Lord holds our hope for a future with Him. God bless.
rickdavisjr 2 years ago
I'm a truth, but not a no planer. Could there have been missiles strapped to the planes, sure.
But really with the windshield. Why even bother going though all that trouble if it's a fkae clip. Whoever made it could have left it out and no one woulda been the wiser.
I'm glad you've realized finally thats a normal radio, and a car antenae, and a windshield. About time :p
Nola213 2 years ago
Nola : I posted this update of "911AMATEUR part3" in february 2008 ...shortly after the first version which I promptly deleted.
I'd say it's "about time" that you found it ! :O)
About the windshield : you should know I have several different versions of this clip(from various TVbroadcasts) and MOST of them are cropped so as to cut out the lower part of the shot (the WINDSHIELD's not seen). You're free to believe that's just a honest 'accident' - I do not : IMHOsomeone didn't ...like it !
simonshack 2 years ago
0:50
I would have been like, "HOLY SHI-"!
StepManiaMaster 2 years ago
That is actually really convincing.
Hmm, but why would they make a video up? What's the point?
Weird.
OMGitsSaffy0o 2 years ago
"Why would they make a video up"....
Please watch my full "September Clues" research. Thanks !
simonshack 2 years ago
I LOVE YOUR SERIES
YoshiFan501 2 years ago
Thank you for opening my eyes, Simon!
crisis1991 2 years ago 7
For anyone that watched this live which has 20/16 vision, the tampering was completely obvious. That third of a second thing. Ah ha ha ha I saw the same shit in the last couple of months too! Now that the digital switch is coming through it'll be even better. Or just less obvious. NPFTM/KMFDM
T1000squared 2 years ago
8:06 have you heard of wing flex?
Zaban94 2 years ago
fucking retardeddddd
at 3:30 he is in a cab or somehting
orisei 2 years ago
great job i'm with you!
0ceanpearl 2 years ago
wait so when I recorded it, i forged it? becuase i dont remember forging a plane into my recording of it 6:11
koolman280 2 years ago 2
koolman280:
who are you and what did you record ?
simonshack 2 years ago
haha chill my pa recorded it and theres a plane on it, it has not been tampered with
koolman280 2 years ago
Please send me a link to your father's recording. Thanks !
simonshack 2 years ago
yeah only problem is that its from a VHS camcorder and i cant put it into my computer and send it to you, even if i could i know you'd try to prove it fake which would be very insulting considering it isnt
koolman280 2 years ago
they were planes not missiles idiots. so..say it was not planes...how did all the people on those flights die? did they just disappear? and was that plane crash in penn just a coincidince?? think idiot
jameskrepp3 2 years ago
Excellent Video! Excellent Job.
PhuqueU 2 years ago
Whats strange is the plane doesn't seem to be impacting on anything, rather it seems to be flying through the tower as if its not there. Doesn't make any sense to me, the wings would have sheared or buckled, and the front nose of the plane would have impacted first so that at least part of the back end of the plane would have come falling down the outer part of the building. Also does anyone actually see the nose of the plane apparently stop at the end of the explosion but totally intact?
dmsparr 2 years ago
these videos are closest thing ive seen in regards to evidence, i believ the general theory of really bad shit going down that day that had nttin to do with islamics but this is dynamite...
thomasmoonman 3 years ago 11
They didnt. Muslims are not the enemy, never have never been never will be. They are to the american people simply because the government, along with Israel and other nations, sold it that way. The real terrorists are in the government and the crooked banker elites around the world.
themantoobeat 2 years ago 4
You will find it all if you google :
"archive radio canada est arrive le 09 11"
simonshack 3 years ago
check out 09.13 of the video and remember what looks like a missile shape and the band around the tail of it..now check out
watch?v=o1eEHAs28
onesliceshort 3 years ago
God Bless You simonshack!
WOW!
SmilingWood 3 years ago 22
bush murderer, usa= war, war, war
INSPECTOR19741 3 years ago 4
bush murderer
INSPECTOR19741 3 years ago 4
gee100, You pose an excellent question. The Fairbanks video was shot from an unnaturally low level. Why? Here's my 2 cents: Contrary to what Shack suggest in this youtube, the reflection in the windshield is not impossible. It actually depicts the correct view of the WTC. The perps wanted that low angle, precisely so they could add a fake reflection of the fake plane for extra authenticity. The perps are very tricky!
saturnaspider 3 years ago
maybe......but if thats true it SUCKS!!!no mirror reflects shit thats BEHIND IT!!!
JulietsMan 3 years ago 4