This is interesting as soon as I found out chick fil wad donating to christian organizations I stopped eating there I was around 14 at the time, it makes me so happy to see I haven't eaten there in 13 years.
believing that there is something wrong with homosexuality doesn't make one a hater. Saying "God hates fags" (instead of loving them as sinners) or murdering people like Matthew Shepard is what makes one a hater: acting out of hate not love. If Christian groups that promote reversal therapy are right, than they're really the ones who are "pro-gay" as in advocating for them. As a Christian, I believe that I need to "speak the truth in love."
The Bible says that "love don't delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. I agree with the statement of the Baptist pastor, John Piper, that "in order to love homosexual persons, Christians --must-- recognize homosexuality as a sin." You should read some of Piper's sermons some time. Here's part one of a good one: desiringgod . org /resource-library/sermons/the-other-dark-exchange-homosexuality-part-1. His main thrust is that homosexuality mirrors human rejection of God and his plan
@Norseman870 ,for an exchange of distorted ways of sin. While homosexuality may be considered "natural ," it is not, from a Christian perspective, in God's original perfect design. Humanity suffers because people don't have God in the center of their lives, hearts, & minds. The remedy is Christ, through which admittingly, we can't find perfect earthly paradise, but as close it gets: much peace, order, joy, and so on. Without God, humanity is diseased by selfishness, fallen nature, and disorder
@Norseman870 accept of course for those civilizations that flourished thousands of years before Christianity. I always wondered why the Christian God had never bothered with those folks? He certainly can't take credit for their success.
@Norseman870 accept of course for those civilizations that flourished thousands of years before Christianity. I always wondered why the Christian God had never bothered with those folks? He certainly can't take credit for their success.
I feel elated to have found you on youtube. I feel smarter everytime I watch one of your videos. You have the most on point sense of humor that I've never seen. From 4:33 onward, you OWNED! I'd never want to get in a disagreement with you lol.
Also this is why I always go to Wendy's... Far as I know, that fast food is all Good. (Really hope I'm right about that and they've not hidden any evil acts that'll destory my happy thoughs and enjoyment of that food.)
dude you talk to much get a life. i have nothing against gay dudes like you. but being gay is against religion. against. 2 opposites are mutual. 2 negatives cant workout. being gay is against life, against nature!
So if I understand you correctly, you have a problem with free thinking people who disagree with your views on gay "rights"? So you're a totalitarian who wants to control thought so that no one dares to disagree with you? What a lofty thinker you are...
@Mira20Mira Some free thinking people may think that. They have a right to that opinion. Most people disagree, but that is no reason to silence dissenting voices.
@kmsoileau IT IS a reason to silence them because it might impacts on other people's rights in the future. Also the vast majority of people who have the views that people of colour and/or homosexual's marry are ignorant and have not realized what love is. Love is blind, genderless, colourless, borderless and so on.
@Mira20Mira "Would you rather a brutal dictator rule? And while we're at it, let's let the pedophiles voice their opinion on love." By definition, a dictator takes power, no one lets him rule. And yes, pedophiles have a right to voice their opinion on love. It harms no one's rights, since most people reject pedophilia.
It's a sign of "dictatorship" when certain voices are silenced.
I notice you didn't answer my question. Care to try again?
I remember this story. I retaliated by making an advertising banner for Chick-Fil-A that had a more truthful slogan than anything they'd ever come up with. I love doing this kind of thing in light of evil business tactics. I left it in the public domain too, so I can share it with anyone who wants it.
exactly why I try not to eat at any restaurants that support liberal agendas like killing babies and gun control. but I might consider eating at chick fil- a now after listening to this stupid rant
I'm just surprised they did not bring into question the power of these organizations themselves. I never really understood how these things work. Does the money go to buying supplies for "god hates fags" signs? Is it being redistributed to active members of the organization? I know there must be a problem with donating to these groups other than giving money to stupid people but unless they're bribing elected officials, I can't see how. Could someone please explain this to me?
That's sad. I'm a HUGE gaming fan, and I love Nintendo, but I'm looking at a long list of anti-gay businesses (Chick-Fil-A is on the list) and if I see Nintendo's name, I'll never give them another cent - I can play Dwarf Fortress. Same goes for any other company I have the ability to boycott. I will not let my money keep me from getting rights.
Amen, brother/sister! A powerful reminder how lazy we have let out brains become. We are becoming like cattle, herded from idea to idea by the Corporation Cowboys who move US to the pasture they want US on!
Everything is a vague continuum of cost vs. benefit.
Through the consequences of my actions I indirectly support an innumerable amount of violations of my own ideals.
Most of the time it the benefit just isn't worth the cost, especially when dealing with immediate and concrete benefits right now vs. the adherence to abstract ideologies (the purposes of which are ultimately to benefit myself, which thus makes them open to violation whenever I deem them so).
@20thcentfox Thing is chic-filet is a private company. They don't answer to stockholder etc. If they want to support PRO-FAMILY values that is their right. If gays don't want to eat there then fine, but when a univeristy is banning chic-filet b/c it doesn't have anti-family values(or what they call "pro-gay") is bullshit because if a school banned an pro-gay company it would be all over the news and considered wrong etc etc. I'm not surprised anti-gay has risen worldwide according to a UN report
@ubermisogynist What's "pro-family" about the prevention of the formation of families? I'm gay, and I've always wanted to raise a family. If I get married and adopt a kid, how is that anti-family? All we want is to be able to start our own families. We want nothing to do with yours.
It's true that as a private company, they can support what they want. That's not was ZJ was talking about. She said that it was scary how people who said they supported gays chose fast food over human rights.
@Tamugetsu "I'm gay, and I've always wanted to raise a family." I'm myopic, and I've always wanted to be a military pilot. Is the fact that the government wouldn't consider me, a violation of my human rights? No. And neither is the government's non-recognition of gay marriage.
@kmsoileau Aww, how cute, you think you won a debate using an argument that isn't applicable in the slightest. It must be nice being an ignorant dumbass white dude and not having to give a shit about reality.
@kmsoileau Marriage does not require the ability to produce children children. If that were the case then sexually impotent people and couples with no intention of having children cannot get married either
I know my tolerance has dropped considerably. I actually went in trying to understand gays. Where i come from gay is just not normal thing people deal with. Social media and all the gays people TV made me try to understand them but i've noticed gays and transgenders are fascist and refuse to see the world from any other pov than their own. I think gays and transgenders create more enemies than anything else.
@ubermisogynist Sweetie, I don't believe that I'm fascist. I do accept other views, I understand where people are coming from when we disagree, and I know I'm not anything close to always being right. However, I do tend to disagree with those who say that I should die and go to hell. Wouldn't you? You say that we create our enemies. How? I've never done anything to you and you call me a fascist. Some gay people might be stubborn, but never generalize about a whole group based on a few.
@Tamugetsu i wrote that awhile ago. Now i don't like gays at all, Tracy Morgan put me over the edge..the gays are a threat to free speech and freedom of expression. He's a comedian..thats what they do..yet the gays want to regulate what people can say....
@ubermisogynist Again, you are assuming we all agree. I don't like what he said, I didn't find it funny, but I will defend his right to say it. I was shocked to hear that he said that, but OK, he said it, he probably didn't mean it the way I took it. I still think it was a stupid thing to do, and I think people should think about how hurtful they are being when they speak, but OF COURSE he had the right to say that! I don't want to regulate free speech, I just want to be allowed to get married!
People are disturbingly, sadly, emotionally attached to certain foods and tend to see their right to eat such foods as always outweighing the rights of those affected by their choices. It never surprises me when things like this happen, but it always depresses me as well.
Chik-Fil-A tastes so good because it is the body of Christ Chicken. He died and was wrapped a delicious blend of herbs and spices. Three days later He rose again, in glorious sandwich form, wearing a single pickle slice (known as Christus Picklus Ascendus in the Latin).
applause!!! Good on you Zinnia Jones <3 down with trans fat, make them who distribute such nasty foods accountable for the cost of healthcare in the United States.... fried chicken joints is like 'Supersize Me' to the tenth power.
Wouldn't the people trying to defend chick-fil-a have gotten downvoted into oblivion, i remember that thread and most of the people commenting on that were going to boycott chick-fil-a.
S. Truett Cathy, the owner of Chik Fil A, is an evangelical Christian, Baptist to be precise. This is why I have never eaten there. They expect their employees to hold "christian values" as well (of course it doesn't say this on the app). In N Out is the same way, they even hide bible verses on their containers (look at the bottom of the cup along the inside edge).
Drs. Freund and Heasman of the Clark Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two studies on child molesters and calculated that 34% and 32% of the sex offenders were homosexual. In cases these doctors had handled, 36% of the molesters were homosexuals. (Freund, K. “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1984; 10:193-200)
@hanksnow82 I'd be very suspicious of any reports by homophobes. They are renowned for making up figures to suit their preconceptions. Even worse are reports from the 1960s, which were only surpassed in rabid homophobia by the insane 1950s.
On top of all that it is extremely difficult to collect figures about sexual molestation because of the stigma and feeling of guilt irrationally attached to the victim. Anybody who claims rock solid figures is just plain wrong.
@miriamEnglish Alfred Kinsey was no homophobe you idiot . It's not hard to get figures about sexual molestation and they all conclude homosexuals molest children at a exponentially higher rate then normal people.
@hanksnow82 I wasn't calling Kinsey a homophobe you twit. I was referring to both you and Paul Cameron (whose lies you are parroting). His bullshit has been thoroughly discredited. Why do you repeat them here? Do you think that saying lies enough times makes them true?
It is not hard to get slanted and erroneous figures about sexual molestation, but it is very difficult to get accurate data, which is why honest researchers don't reach the same conclusions you do.
@miriamEnglish So out of the 10 studies i posted all basically saying the same thing theres one you don't like , LOL . Sorry you don't like the facts but thats life .
@hanksnow82 No. The studies only appear to say the same thing when reinterpreted by Paul Cameron's lies. He has been spurned by legitimate researchers for "creatively" altering their results to make it appear that he has support that he doesn't in fact have for his fanatical crusade against homosexuals.
Alfred Kinsey was the first to identify a correlation between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors. In 1948, he found that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old. More recently, in organs such as the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Sex Research, the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy and Pediatrics, it has been established that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among child molesters.
@hanksnow82 Male pedophiles abuse girls and boys. When girls are abused and become gay, abuse is blamed. When boys are abused and become gay abuse is also blamed. I think that pedophiles can sense homosexual feelings in children and they target those children because they are easy pickings. YOUR HATE contributes to this problem. And if we have properly identified all child molesters, why does abuse still occur?
In 1995 the homosexual magazine "Guide" said, "We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual" and "deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. …" The article went on to say: "Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children's sexuality … we must do it for the children's sake."
@hanksnow82 Exactly what is wrong with that? Teenage boys are some of the most sexual people on the planet, but society insists on bottling that up in case you make Jesus angry. Just because someone's gay and speaks up in defense of teenage sexuality doesn't mean they're pedophiles. Would you think the same thing if a straight woman said it? Even children younger than teenagers have sexuality; they can't understand the implications, so they shouldn't have sex, but they should be taught about it.
Alfred Kinsey was the first to identify a correlation between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors. In 1948, he found that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old. More recently, in organs such as the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Sex Research, the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy and Pediatrics, it has been established that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among child molesters.
@hanksnow82 And how old were the male homosexuals? I don't see anything wrong with someone having sex with a 17 year old kid or under if they themselves are 17 or under, even 18, 19, or 20. And exactly how has this been established, define disproportionately, and define child molester.
a study a study by Dr. Gene Abel, director of the Behavioral Medicine Institute in Atlanta, which was published in 1987 in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, found that homosexuals sexually molest young boys with an incidence five times greater than the molestation rate of girls. The study found that 150 boys are molested by one male homosexual offender, compared to 19.8 girls by heterosexual offenders.
If people really had values and respect for life when it comes to what they eat, animals killed for food (like chickens) wouldn't be raised and killed in just about the most cruel, unnatural ways possible, all in the name of maximizing profit. :(
Another researcher is Dean Hamer. Hamer examined the possibility of homosexuality being an X-linked trait. He examined the family trees of openly gay men, and thought he saw a maternal link, leading him to investigate his theory of X-linkage. He took 40 DNA samples from homosexual men, and genetically examined them. He found that there was a 'remarkable concordance' for 5 genetic markers on section of the X-Chromosome called Xq28.
@loner1878 You went from Homosexuality is genetic to Homosexulaity is likely genetic to my opinion is homosexuality is genetic , LOL . I see you are still unable to post a single study to back up anything you say . LOL Ive crushed many people on this topic before but you trully are the biggest jack off i have come across in a while .
You're a real idiot, LOL. All you've done is show you're unwilling to listen to any opinion but your own and the best you can do is hurl insults and claim yourself a winner like a five year old at a board game. Losers like you sure a re a dime a dozen on this site.
@loner1878 Wait wait wait. Why the HELL does it matter if being gay is genetic or not? Don't get caught up in that red herring. If it was a choice, would you be any less supportive of their rights?
@Llawliet246 The homosexual community has a lot invested in the " born that way " theory . The militant homosexuals are using this to promote homosexuality as normal .
@hanksnow82 Sure, it might not be normal. Guess what else isn't normal - being a philosopher, or a neurosurgeon, or a human being who can actually think for themselves. Personally, I think they're born that way because the evidence points there (although female sexuality is a lot more fluid), but whether they were born that way or not, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, and that is no reason to take away their rights and discriminate against them.
@hanksnow82 Marriage isn't a special right, it is a fundamental right. Churches don't have to do it, but why the fuck shouldn't a non-religious marriage be open to them? They aren't biological mistakes. They are just as human as you or me, they just happen to love someone with the same genital configuration. What about that makes the moral zeitgeist of the world unravel at your oh-so-holy feet?
@hanksnow82 What a mature comment. 1) Ok, not all gay men have anal sex.. 2) Some heterosexual men and some heterosexual women practice and enjoy anal sex. 3) A man's prostate can be effectively stimulated by anal sex and many men can orgasm this way (gay and straight).
@hanksnow82 Okay so... pedophilia is equal to homosexuality because...? Homosexuality is a relationship between two consenting adults. Pedophilia often entails lack of consent. If consent means nothing, then you might as well compare heterosexuality to rape.
Luckily this one is easy for me. I'm Vegan. I have often stopped shopping at places when I found out they donated $ to right wing causes (directly or indirectly). It's the most power I have (as my vote clearly doesn't count). The thing that is making it very difficult these days is that the chains are swallowing up all the local stores, and even the local stores don't carry local products anymore. We do the best we can, and that is what I expect from others.
Heres the bottom line on a per capita bases there is no fast food place that gives more to charity then Chic-Fil-A . They mark a certain amount of their profits to go back into the community unlike any of the other fast food places . If you give to enough people long enough i guess they will piss off someone sooner or later .
Also, its pretty clear you haven't studied much genetics. Its not likely there is a single "gay gene." Just the way you phrased that is wrong at intro-biology level. Genetics is not so simple. Due to the amount of variation in something as broad as sexual orientation, genetic contributions are likely to be polygenic (more than one gene actively involved). Other likely biological influences: epigenetics or intrauterine environment (sex hormones or glucocorticoid hormone levels).
@loner1878 Again there is no science showing ANY genetic bases for homosexuality . While there may or may not be biological influences all credible experts in the field believe nurture is a major contributing factor if not the preeminant cause of homosexuality . It's obvious you know little about this topic or are politically blinded to the facts .
@imN0Ttheone Huh, I've never heard any actually expert give nurture OR nature much more than 50% influence on most issues of personal behavior. You're talking out of your ass and shouldn't ask people to fuck off; they're probably pretty ready to ignore you at this point anyway.
@dlewis1498 Your another dunb ass who can't sight any study or any report to back up what you say . please fuck off with your bull shit , no ones buying it asshole .
Are you being obtuse on purpose are are you really that thick skulled? MOST scientific research indicates that there is a genetic basis for homosexualitynd the "nurture" perspective is quickly falling out of favor. You're the one turning a blind eye and a deaf ear to repeated medical research in favor of one little study that suits your views.
@loner1878 The only study you name so it can be verified is Bogaert at Brock University and it's full of problems . Reseacher bias since Anthony Bogaert is a homosexual activist . Bogaert uses snowball sampling by advertising for his participants in homosexual magazines . To see this study ripped to shreds google ( Ignorant Critics Could having older brothers make you gay ) I will repeat again there is no gay gene and no genetic conection to homosexuality has ever been proven.
Try and learn to read, I clearly cited various studies. While most evidence present today indicates that homosexuality is likely genetic (you can kick and scream all you like but that won't change what most of the evidence shows) there is of course not a final consensus. You stubbornly proclaiming there is no "gay gene" is flat out ignorant and bordering on fanatic.
@loner1878 Funny that you are unable to site this study that shows genetics are responsible for homosexuality , maybe thats because it doesn't exsist ? Now your just wasting my time so please feel free to fuck off .
Wow, you're definitely acting stupid on purpose or have zero understanding of the subject. I just explained that genetics is rarely as simple as one gene and CLEARLY STATED that research is still being conducted but favoring a genetic explanation. I showed you various studies that indicated genes played a major role. And what do you do? Stuff your fingers in your ears and cover your eyes. Truly pathetic. Go take a basic biology class, you need it.
@loner1878 Take a reading comprehension class you desperately need it . You are unable to back up any of your assertions with any science . If you ever find a study that says homosexuality is genetic post it i would love to see it but until then you don't seem to have any thing relavent to add to the discussion .
Yeah, just coviniently ignore the multiple studies I posted earlier from medical, peer reviewed journals. Are you selectively blind or just playing dumb?
@loner1878 You coviniently forgot to name the studies in a way they could be looked up you jerk off . There is no homosexual gene and there is no study that proves there is one case closed
Well ask me to PM you the journals, you genius. And I see you've also ignored the basic explanation I gave you about genetics. There is very likely a genetic contribution for homosexuality (not dependent one one gene but multiple). Kick and scream about it all you like, kid. LOL "case closed." Amazing how so many people are proud to be ignorant.
@loner1878 Asshole you just put the person who did the study and where and when it was done in your text and everyone can see it , sheesh what are you 13 yrs old ? I see you have gone from saying it's genetic to say it's likely genetic which i guess is your way of conceeding that you don't know your ass from a whole in the ground .
Ooh, ad hominems. The pathetic debate tactic that those who know they have nothing of substance to say use. You do realize there's a text limit? Hard enough to sum up the studies. All you had to do was ask, sweetheart. And ease on the ad hominerms, it kind of makes you look desperate ;)
My opinion is that homosexuality is genetic, the current research available says its likely genetic. Try and read more closely. Try and get your own head out of your ass before criticizing others.
@loner1878 David Halperin PHD Stanford University ( 1980) found a weak father and strong mother, with an unresolved Oedipus complex will lead to a weak, and then homosexual, son, because the mother has too strong of an image, compared to the weak state of the father. Halpern is also a Guggenheim fellow .
Oh please, thats an old theory that is pretty flimsy at best. I studied Halperin, he was a Freudian psychologist who has a large following from many Christian interest groups, but his theory has been largely debunked by the psychological community at large, as it provides only a result, not a cause. Halperin failed to produce any scientific evidence, only examples.
How do you then explain homosexuality in men who have fathers present and "strong"? What causes lesbianism then?
@imN0Ttheone J. Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard studied the gayness between MZ twins, DZ twins, and non-related adopted brothers. They found that 52% of MZ twins were both self-identified homosexuals, 22% of DZ twins were so, and only 5% of non-related adopted brothers were. This evidence, repeated and found to be true a second time, showed that the more closely genetically linked, the more likely they both are to be gay or straight. Later experiments showed similar evidence in females.
LOL, you think that refutes homosexuality as genetic, that half of identical twins turn out heterosexual? You're more of an idiot than I thought. Zero understanding of genetics (which I was nice enough to explain to your dumb ass) and proud of it, I see.
Hamer hypothesized upon examining the family trees of the same men that on each subject's mother's side, there were markedly larger numbers of homosexual men, all stemming through the maternal lineages. This observation, along with his startling discovery on Xq28, led his findings to be dubbed the "gay gene study". The statistical probability of the 5 genetic markers on Xq28 to have matched randomly was calculated to be 1/100,000, lending even more support to his findings.
@loner1878 A study conducted in 1993 by openly "gay" activist and researcher Dr. Dean Hamer of the National Cancer Institute examined the X chromosomes of 40 pairs of homosexual brothers. The study, which appeared in the March 1993 issue of the journal Science, found that 33 of the pairs of brothers had genetic markers for male homosexuality.
@loner1878 A new study attempting to replicate Hamer's was released today by the same Science magazine, discrediting the 1993 study. The study conducted by scientists from the Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences at the University of Western Ontario and the Department of Genetics at Stanford Medical School concluded that "data do not support the presence of a gene of large effect influencing sexual orientation."
@loner1878 The Boston Globe reported in February that the media-ballyhooed "gay gene" theory was already in trouble. The Globe article featured the findings of Dr. Richard Pillard, a professor of psychiatry at Boston University's School of Medicine, whose twin studies showed "that sexuality is greatly influenced by environment, and that the role of genetics is, in the end, limited."
Mind giving a date for that article? Because I just looked up a 2003 article that cites Dr. Pillard and he states that homosexuality is often inherited.
You might want to get off your christian extremist wes
I haven't been to Stupidly Spelled Chicken Restaurant yet, but I think I'm going to go to see what I can steal and/or vandalize.
I'll tell them god told me to do it because chickens are satan's doves.
zEropoint68 3 days ago
That doesn't surprise me at all. I'm pretty sure the founder was some old conservative guy, and they're closed on Sundays.
ChocolateTheif 4 days ago
THE MOMENT I found that out about chik fil-a, I quit eating there, even if it WERE only rumor (until I knew better).
But ey, I'm just one person, and some people want their sandwiches too much...
SmashtheCmachine 1 month ago
This is interesting as soon as I found out chick fil wad donating to christian organizations I stopped eating there I was around 14 at the time, it makes me so happy to see I haven't eaten there in 13 years.
thuringwethil93 1 month ago
believing that there is something wrong with homosexuality doesn't make one a hater. Saying "God hates fags" (instead of loving them as sinners) or murdering people like Matthew Shepard is what makes one a hater: acting out of hate not love. If Christian groups that promote reversal therapy are right, than they're really the ones who are "pro-gay" as in advocating for them. As a Christian, I believe that I need to "speak the truth in love."
Norseman870 1 month ago
Comment removed
Norseman870 1 month ago
The Bible says that "love don't delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. I agree with the statement of the Baptist pastor, John Piper, that "in order to love homosexual persons, Christians --must-- recognize homosexuality as a sin." You should read some of Piper's sermons some time. Here's part one of a good one: desiringgod . org /resource-library/sermons/the-other-dark-exchange-homosexuality-part-1. His main thrust is that homosexuality mirrors human rejection of God and his plan
Norseman870 1 month ago
@Norseman870 ,for an exchange of distorted ways of sin. While homosexuality may be considered "natural ," it is not, from a Christian perspective, in God's original perfect design. Humanity suffers because people don't have God in the center of their lives, hearts, & minds. The remedy is Christ, through which admittingly, we can't find perfect earthly paradise, but as close it gets: much peace, order, joy, and so on. Without God, humanity is diseased by selfishness, fallen nature, and disorder
Norseman870 1 month ago
@Norseman870 accept of course for those civilizations that flourished thousands of years before Christianity. I always wondered why the Christian God had never bothered with those folks? He certainly can't take credit for their success.
willard39 1 week ago
@willard39 i suppose the Aztecs, for example, did pretty well. but they also did human sacrifices. I wasn't talking about material success
Norseman870 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Norseman870 accept of course for those civilizations that flourished thousands of years before Christianity. I always wondered why the Christian God had never bothered with those folks? He certainly can't take credit for their success.
willard39 1 week ago
gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay
homo homo homo homo homo homo homo
fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag
trany trany trany trany trany trany trany trany
MarcusL1996 1 month ago
But the waffle fries are so good! :(
May I please go back to not knowing? Please?
Mikey9211 1 month ago
I feel elated to have found you on youtube. I feel smarter everytime I watch one of your videos. You have the most on point sense of humor that I've never seen. From 4:33 onward, you OWNED! I'd never want to get in a disagreement with you lol.
brightstarlit 1 month ago
I love you Daria.
Seriously though fuck Chick a fil. Did you know they even donated to exodus international, really those fucks, it's beyond the goddamn pale.
Bastmosis 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Well, there are no Chik-Fil-As around here, so that makes my choice pretty easy.
But now I'm wondering if any of my local fast food places are doing this kinda shit. D:
GuacamoleKun 1 month ago
Fried Chicken is disgusting.
Z3R0MU5 2 months ago
@Z3R0MU5 Fried chicken is fucking awesome. But it's a hell of a lot better for you, and cheaper, if you make it yourself.
sk8tafrnk 1 month ago
This is why I would love to have everybody being androgynous. Then what is gay/straight/bi/trans?
everybody being androgynous atheists would be quite awsum!!!!!!!111!!!1oneone!11!!!
livedandletdie 2 months ago
THATS A DUDE LOLOLOL
oifydude 2 months ago
is it ok if they r the only chicken place in town?
GOD2sodomyME 2 months ago
@GOD2sodomyME nope. You can make your own chicken at a lot lower of the cost. Chicken does not outweigh equality
ZeroSonic360 1 month ago
I don't eat at Chik-Fil-A because they're anti-homosexual.
jont43 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
People's human rights are not as important as $2.99 french fries? I don't want to live on this planet anymore
alinkyng 2 months ago
Well, those chicken nuggets ARE pretty good..
hurtmeloveme 3 months ago
Also this is why I always go to Wendy's... Far as I know, that fast food is all Good. (Really hope I'm right about that and they've not hidden any evil acts that'll destory my happy thoughs and enjoyment of that food.)
Xel963 4 months ago 4
I've never been to chik-fil-a... >.>
But I love how much you keep speaking the turth about those groups!
Xel963 4 months ago
I havent even seen a chic fila, are they not in oregon?
TheTHESTOOGE 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude you talk to much get a life. i have nothing against gay dudes like you. but being gay is against religion. against. 2 opposites are mutual. 2 negatives cant workout. being gay is against life, against nature!
jimmyisgolden 6 months ago
@kmsoileau You disgust me. I have nothing to say to you, you lowly oaf.
Mira20Mira 6 months ago
@Mira20Mira You certainly have nothing intelligent to say to me, that much is true.
kmsoileau 6 months ago
@kmsoileau I have NOTHING to say to you, let alone anything intelligent.
Mira20Mira 6 months ago
@Mira20Mira Whatever, Forrest. Run, Forrest, run!
kmsoileau 6 months ago
Oh man. I love Zinnia, but I also love Chick-Fil-A!!!! GRAHHHHH!!!!
SuperNoahZark 6 months ago
So if I understand you correctly, you have a problem with free thinking people who disagree with your views on gay "rights"? So you're a totalitarian who wants to control thought so that no one dares to disagree with you? What a lofty thinker you are...
kmsoileau 7 months ago
@kmsoileau Would I have problem if I was a free thinking person who thought coloured people shouldn't be able to get married?
Mira20Mira 6 months ago
@Mira20Mira Some free thinking people may think that. They have a right to that opinion. Most people disagree, but that is no reason to silence dissenting voices.
kmsoileau 6 months ago
@kmsoileau IT IS a reason to silence them because it might impacts on other people's rights in the future. Also the vast majority of people who have the views that people of colour and/or homosexual's marry are ignorant and have not realized what love is. Love is blind, genderless, colourless, borderless and so on.
Mira20Mira 6 months ago
@Mira20Mira Who gets to decide who gets silenced and who doesn't? You?
kmsoileau 6 months ago
@kmsoileau Would you rather a brutal dictator rule? And while we're at it, let's let the pedophiles voice their opinion on love.
Mira20Mira 6 months ago
@Mira20Mira "Would you rather a brutal dictator rule? And while we're at it, let's let the pedophiles voice their opinion on love." By definition, a dictator takes power, no one lets him rule. And yes, pedophiles have a right to voice their opinion on love. It harms no one's rights, since most people reject pedophilia.
It's a sign of "dictatorship" when certain voices are silenced.
I notice you didn't answer my question. Care to try again?
kmsoileau 6 months ago
I remember this story. I retaliated by making an advertising banner for Chick-Fil-A that had a more truthful slogan than anything they'd ever come up with. I love doing this kind of thing in light of evil business tactics. I left it in the public domain too, so I can share it with anyone who wants it.
TheCeejReturns 7 months ago
exactly why I try not to eat at any restaurants that support liberal agendas like killing babies and gun control. but I might consider eating at chick fil- a now after listening to this stupid rant
jtpublsh 7 months ago
@jtpublsh *cough, cough* Hick!
Mira20Mira 6 months ago
MAN LADY OMGG!!!
jettomatic2000 7 months ago
I'm just surprised they did not bring into question the power of these organizations themselves. I never really understood how these things work. Does the money go to buying supplies for "god hates fags" signs? Is it being redistributed to active members of the organization? I know there must be a problem with donating to these groups other than giving money to stupid people but unless they're bribing elected officials, I can't see how. Could someone please explain this to me?
DepressedAnnnie 7 months ago
You're a guy in drag right?
thenodfather 8 months ago
It's as if daria asexually reproduced.
God, I want her.
thescarletsilence 8 months ago
That's sad. I'm a HUGE gaming fan, and I love Nintendo, but I'm looking at a long list of anti-gay businesses (Chick-Fil-A is on the list) and if I see Nintendo's name, I'll never give them another cent - I can play Dwarf Fortress. Same goes for any other company I have the ability to boycott. I will not let my money keep me from getting rights.
Tamugetsu 8 months ago
Amen, brother/sister! A powerful reminder how lazy we have let out brains become. We are becoming like cattle, herded from idea to idea by the Corporation Cowboys who move US to the pasture they want US on!
facturaDan 8 months ago
Everything is a vague continuum of cost vs. benefit.
Through the consequences of my actions I indirectly support an innumerable amount of violations of my own ideals.
Most of the time it the benefit just isn't worth the cost, especially when dealing with immediate and concrete benefits right now vs. the adherence to abstract ideologies (the purposes of which are ultimately to benefit myself, which thus makes them open to violation whenever I deem them so).
MrCattlehunter 8 months ago
Private companies can support whoever they want. You also can eat whatever you want. Got a problem? I don't.
LisaJMoore 9 months ago
@20thcentfox Thing is chic-filet is a private company. They don't answer to stockholder etc. If they want to support PRO-FAMILY values that is their right. If gays don't want to eat there then fine, but when a univeristy is banning chic-filet b/c it doesn't have anti-family values(or what they call "pro-gay") is bullshit because if a school banned an pro-gay company it would be all over the news and considered wrong etc etc. I'm not surprised anti-gay has risen worldwide according to a UN report
ubermisogynist 9 months ago
@ubermisogynist What's "pro-family" about the prevention of the formation of families? I'm gay, and I've always wanted to raise a family. If I get married and adopt a kid, how is that anti-family? All we want is to be able to start our own families. We want nothing to do with yours.
It's true that as a private company, they can support what they want. That's not was ZJ was talking about. She said that it was scary how people who said they supported gays chose fast food over human rights.
Tamugetsu 8 months ago
@Tamugetsu "I'm gay, and I've always wanted to raise a family." I'm myopic, and I've always wanted to be a military pilot. Is the fact that the government wouldn't consider me, a violation of my human rights? No. And neither is the government's non-recognition of gay marriage.
kmsoileau 6 months ago
@kmsoileau Aww, how cute, you think you won a debate using an argument that isn't applicable in the slightest. It must be nice being an ignorant dumbass white dude and not having to give a shit about reality.
ryuuseicha 5 months ago
@ryuuseicha The sad thing is, your post is probably the result of your most strenuous effort to have an intelligent thought...
kmsoileau 5 months ago
@kmsoileau Marriage does not require the ability to produce children children. If that were the case then sexually impotent people and couples with no intention of having children cannot get married either
AlternateArtisan 3 months ago
I know my tolerance has dropped considerably. I actually went in trying to understand gays. Where i come from gay is just not normal thing people deal with. Social media and all the gays people TV made me try to understand them but i've noticed gays and transgenders are fascist and refuse to see the world from any other pov than their own. I think gays and transgenders create more enemies than anything else.
ubermisogynist 9 months ago
@ubermisogynist Sweetie, I don't believe that I'm fascist. I do accept other views, I understand where people are coming from when we disagree, and I know I'm not anything close to always being right. However, I do tend to disagree with those who say that I should die and go to hell. Wouldn't you? You say that we create our enemies. How? I've never done anything to you and you call me a fascist. Some gay people might be stubborn, but never generalize about a whole group based on a few.
Tamugetsu 8 months ago
@Tamugetsu i wrote that awhile ago. Now i don't like gays at all, Tracy Morgan put me over the edge..the gays are a threat to free speech and freedom of expression. He's a comedian..thats what they do..yet the gays want to regulate what people can say....
ubermisogynist 8 months ago
@ubermisogynist Again, you are assuming we all agree. I don't like what he said, I didn't find it funny, but I will defend his right to say it. I was shocked to hear that he said that, but OK, he said it, he probably didn't mean it the way I took it. I still think it was a stupid thing to do, and I think people should think about how hurtful they are being when they speak, but OF COURSE he had the right to say that! I don't want to regulate free speech, I just want to be allowed to get married!
Tamugetsu 8 months ago
People are disturbingly, sadly, emotionally attached to certain foods and tend to see their right to eat such foods as always outweighing the rights of those affected by their choices. It never surprises me when things like this happen, but it always depresses me as well.
sarcasticwhiteboard 9 months ago
Chik-Fil-A tastes so good because it is the body of Christ Chicken. He died and was wrapped a delicious blend of herbs and spices. Three days later He rose again, in glorious sandwich form, wearing a single pickle slice (known as Christus Picklus Ascendus in the Latin).
clintallen123 9 months ago 29
And the food sucks.
nbelsky 9 months ago
@nbelsky Good. There's one on my college campus, I've never gone, and now I have no reason to! Thanks, and thanks to you too, Zinnia!
Tamugetsu 8 months ago
I think they should make a penis shaped chicken sandwich now, so that they, and we all can eat a dick
jblev2 9 months ago
Christ-fil-a sucks anyways. Why would people wanna eat there?
Jack529Teal 9 months ago
As if I needed another reason to be vegetarian. :-)
PourLaLiberte1 9 months ago
They have the FCA in my high school....ugh, I get so pissed off when they act like christianity is the only religion in schools.
PrivateSnowballTFC 10 months ago
@FlippinYes *not a grammar nazi, but could you pls. hold the cusswords? that's what makes you seem dumb. Only sayin.
MallGrabMcTwist 10 months ago
applause!!! Good on you Zinnia Jones <3 down with trans fat, make them who distribute such nasty foods accountable for the cost of healthcare in the United States.... fried chicken joints is like 'Supersize Me' to the tenth power.
MallGrabMcTwist 10 months ago
there's still a kfc..
bla34112 10 months ago
Wouldn't the people trying to defend chick-fil-a have gotten downvoted into oblivion, i remember that thread and most of the people commenting on that were going to boycott chick-fil-a.
aworldanonymous 10 months ago
S. Truett Cathy, the owner of Chik Fil A, is an evangelical Christian, Baptist to be precise. This is why I have never eaten there. They expect their employees to hold "christian values" as well (of course it doesn't say this on the app). In N Out is the same way, they even hide bible verses on their containers (look at the bottom of the cup along the inside edge).
rylraven13 10 months ago
Fuck! And I really like Chik Fil A's food! :(
JanusChristIsRisen 10 months ago
check out bwJkYwYempc
So Chic fa lay sends money to anti gay groups and McDonald's beats the living hell out of them. Fast food really is evil, who knew
FrogShaman 10 months ago
I just threw up in my mouth after seeing your hideous gay rim job giving ass fucking ballsack licking jizz gulping butt raping vagina fearing face.
ObamaSucks12345 10 months ago
Drs. Freund and Heasman of the Clark Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two studies on child molesters and calculated that 34% and 32% of the sex offenders were homosexual. In cases these doctors had handled, 36% of the molesters were homosexuals. (Freund, K. “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1984; 10:193-200)
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 I'd be very suspicious of any reports by homophobes. They are renowned for making up figures to suit their preconceptions. Even worse are reports from the 1960s, which were only surpassed in rabid homophobia by the insane 1950s.
On top of all that it is extremely difficult to collect figures about sexual molestation because of the stigma and feeling of guilt irrationally attached to the victim. Anybody who claims rock solid figures is just plain wrong.
miriamEnglish 10 months ago
@miriamEnglish Alfred Kinsey was no homophobe you idiot . It's not hard to get figures about sexual molestation and they all conclude homosexuals molest children at a exponentially higher rate then normal people.
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 I wasn't calling Kinsey a homophobe you twit. I was referring to both you and Paul Cameron (whose lies you are parroting). His bullshit has been thoroughly discredited. Why do you repeat them here? Do you think that saying lies enough times makes them true?
It is not hard to get slanted and erroneous figures about sexual molestation, but it is very difficult to get accurate data, which is why honest researchers don't reach the same conclusions you do.
miriamEnglish 10 months ago
@miriamEnglish So out of the 10 studies i posted all basically saying the same thing theres one you don't like , LOL . Sorry you don't like the facts but thats life .
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 No. The studies only appear to say the same thing when reinterpreted by Paul Cameron's lies. He has been spurned by legitimate researchers for "creatively" altering their results to make it appear that he has support that he doesn't in fact have for his fanatical crusade against homosexuals.
miriamEnglish 10 months ago
What is that thing and why is it so ignorant
rachelerin03 10 months ago
Would it be so had to just stop eating at CFA?
Tatsuyoujo 10 months ago
Alfred Kinsey was the first to identify a correlation between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors. In 1948, he found that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old. More recently, in organs such as the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Sex Research, the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy and Pediatrics, it has been established that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among child molesters.
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 Male pedophiles abuse girls and boys. When girls are abused and become gay, abuse is blamed. When boys are abused and become gay abuse is also blamed. I think that pedophiles can sense homosexual feelings in children and they target those children because they are easy pickings. YOUR HATE contributes to this problem. And if we have properly identified all child molesters, why does abuse still occur?
105Mittens 10 months ago
@hanksnow82
Prove it.
GnomesAmok 10 months ago
another served oh yeah!
MochizMuM 10 months ago
Chick fil-a isnt even that good
dragonsder 10 months ago 18
this is like "dental plan, Lisa needs braces, dental plan, Lisa needs braces" only not funny
cigarcough 10 months ago
In 1995 the homosexual magazine "Guide" said, "We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual" and "deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. …" The article went on to say: "Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children's sexuality … we must do it for the children's sake."
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 Exactly what is wrong with that? Teenage boys are some of the most sexual people on the planet, but society insists on bottling that up in case you make Jesus angry. Just because someone's gay and speaks up in defense of teenage sexuality doesn't mean they're pedophiles. Would you think the same thing if a straight woman said it? Even children younger than teenagers have sexuality; they can't understand the implications, so they shouldn't have sex, but they should be taught about it.
Llawliet246 10 months ago
Comment removed
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 And you display your ignorance flagrantly, good sir. Thank you for proving my point :)
Llawliet246 10 months ago
Comment removed
hanksnow82 10 months ago
Alfred Kinsey was the first to identify a correlation between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors. In 1948, he found that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old. More recently, in organs such as the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Sex Research, the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy and Pediatrics, it has been established that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among child molesters.
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 And how old were the male homosexuals? I don't see anything wrong with someone having sex with a 17 year old kid or under if they themselves are 17 or under, even 18, 19, or 20. And exactly how has this been established, define disproportionately, and define child molester.
Llawliet246 10 months ago
@Llawliet246 The homosexual / pedophiles were 21 yrs and older in the study . If i have to define child molester for you , you probally are one .
hanksnow82 10 months ago
Pedophilia in the Homosexual World
By Bob Ellis
a study a study by Dr. Gene Abel, director of the Behavioral Medicine Institute in Atlanta, which was published in 1987 in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, found that homosexuals sexually molest young boys with an incidence five times greater than the molestation rate of girls. The study found that 150 boys are molested by one male homosexual offender, compared to 19.8 girls by heterosexual offenders.
hanksnow82 10 months ago
awsome vid zj..
scorand 10 months ago
If people really had values and respect for life when it comes to what they eat, animals killed for food (like chickens) wouldn't be raised and killed in just about the most cruel, unnatural ways possible, all in the name of maximizing profit. :(
105Mittens 10 months ago
I would like to see people's reactions if Chick-fil-A had donated to NAMBLA.
Llawliet246 10 months ago
Another researcher is Dean Hamer. Hamer examined the possibility of homosexuality being an X-linked trait. He examined the family trees of openly gay men, and thought he saw a maternal link, leading him to investigate his theory of X-linkage. He took 40 DNA samples from homosexual men, and genetically examined them. He found that there was a 'remarkable concordance' for 5 genetic markers on section of the X-Chromosome called Xq28.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 You went from Homosexuality is genetic to Homosexulaity is likely genetic to my opinion is homosexuality is genetic , LOL . I see you are still unable to post a single study to back up anything you say . LOL Ive crushed many people on this topic before but you trully are the biggest jack off i have come across in a while .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
You're a real idiot, LOL. All you've done is show you're unwilling to listen to any opinion but your own and the best you can do is hurl insults and claim yourself a winner like a five year old at a board game. Losers like you sure a re a dime a dozen on this site.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Wait wait wait. Why the HELL does it matter if being gay is genetic or not? Don't get caught up in that red herring. If it was a choice, would you be any less supportive of their rights?
Llawliet246 10 months ago
@Llawliet246 The homosexual community has a lot invested in the " born that way " theory . The militant homosexuals are using this to promote homosexuality as normal .
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 Sure, it might not be normal. Guess what else isn't normal - being a philosopher, or a neurosurgeon, or a human being who can actually think for themselves. Personally, I think they're born that way because the evidence points there (although female sexuality is a lot more fluid), but whether they were born that way or not, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, and that is no reason to take away their rights and discriminate against them.
Llawliet246 10 months ago
@Llawliet246 No one is taking away anyones rights away but they are not giving anyone special rights because they are a biological mistake either .
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 Marriage isn't a special right, it is a fundamental right. Churches don't have to do it, but why the fuck shouldn't a non-religious marriage be open to them? They aren't biological mistakes. They are just as human as you or me, they just happen to love someone with the same genital configuration. What about that makes the moral zeitgeist of the world unravel at your oh-so-holy feet?
Llawliet246 10 months ago
@Llawliet246 My feet are not holy as i don't believe in god
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 If you don't believe in a deity then where the hell is your justification for your bigotry?
Llawliet246 10 months ago
@Llawliet246 There is nothing biggoted about not believing the lies put out by homosexual groups and lobbies .
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 Yes, it is sad that people's individual choices and rights have to be contingent on others' understanding of science.
105Mittens 10 months ago
@105Mittens And you have little understanding of scinece if you think a mans dick belongs in another mans ass .
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 What a mature comment. 1) Ok, not all gay men have anal sex.. 2) Some heterosexual men and some heterosexual women practice and enjoy anal sex. 3) A man's prostate can be effectively stimulated by anal sex and many men can orgasm this way (gay and straight).
105Mittens 10 months ago
@Llawliet246 Your half right if pedofilia and homosexulity is genetic we should still reject them both
hanksnow82 10 months ago
@hanksnow82 Okay so... pedophilia is equal to homosexuality because...? Homosexuality is a relationship between two consenting adults. Pedophilia often entails lack of consent. If consent means nothing, then you might as well compare heterosexuality to rape.
Llawliet246 10 months ago
@Llawliet246
Nope, but then again I never believed it was a choice. But I was just showing the scientific studies since the loser I'm arguing kept demanding them.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Ah, okay. It's just good to point out that either way, it doesn't matter.
Llawliet246 10 months ago
Chic-fil-a is so friggin gooooood! =(
lovleelaura88 10 months ago
Luckily this one is easy for me. I'm Vegan. I have often stopped shopping at places when I found out they donated $ to right wing causes (directly or indirectly). It's the most power I have (as my vote clearly doesn't count). The thing that is making it very difficult these days is that the chains are swallowing up all the local stores, and even the local stores don't carry local products anymore. We do the best we can, and that is what I expect from others.
veggiescrub 10 months ago
Why do you try so hard to not move your head? LET LOOSE. Your tone is too serious, too.
osculigc 10 months ago
@osculigc no its not
tehLeecherer 10 months ago
you sound like a man
samuelthedesoluteone 10 months ago
DAMN YOU CHICK-FIL-A WITH YOUR DIABOLICAL COMBINATION OF TASTY WAFFLE FRIES AND REPELLENT POLITICS!
Bastards!
MillaJanick 10 months ago 11
How can this ugly jackass live with himself?
7ees 10 months ago
@7ees Oh, don't be that way. You're not as much of an ugly jackass as people say you are :(
sashavboyd 10 months ago 3
@7ees
Sorry you feel that way about yourself. I'm sure you're beautiful on the inside.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878
Ah, the tranny has two faggots defending it.
I feel sorry for the both of you..
7ees 10 months ago
@7ees
I'm straight, but pretend I'm gay if it makes you happy (or secretly hot), sweetie. Its ignorant homophobes like you who should be pitied.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878
No, you're definitely a sodomite. I can hear your nasty lisp all the way over here.
I hope you and the tranny get some professional help soon :)
Good luck
7ees 10 months ago
@7ees
LOL, I didn't know the term sodomite applied to females. Go back to worshipping Glenn Beck and the 700 club, ya hick.
loner1878 10 months ago
Heres the bottom line on a per capita bases there is no fast food place that gives more to charity then Chic-Fil-A . They mark a certain amount of their profits to go back into the community unlike any of the other fast food places . If you give to enough people long enough i guess they will piss off someone sooner or later .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Also, its pretty clear you haven't studied much genetics. Its not likely there is a single "gay gene." Just the way you phrased that is wrong at intro-biology level. Genetics is not so simple. Due to the amount of variation in something as broad as sexual orientation, genetic contributions are likely to be polygenic (more than one gene actively involved). Other likely biological influences: epigenetics or intrauterine environment (sex hormones or glucocorticoid hormone levels).
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Again there is no science showing ANY genetic bases for homosexuality . While there may or may not be biological influences all credible experts in the field believe nurture is a major contributing factor if not the preeminant cause of homosexuality . It's obvious you know little about this topic or are politically blinded to the facts .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone Huh, I've never heard any actually expert give nurture OR nature much more than 50% influence on most issues of personal behavior. You're talking out of your ass and shouldn't ask people to fuck off; they're probably pretty ready to ignore you at this point anyway.
dlewis1498 10 months ago
@dlewis1498 Your another dunb ass who can't sight any study or any report to back up what you say . please fuck off with your bull shit , no ones buying it asshole .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
Comment removed
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Uhhh, who the fuck are you? I didn't say you said anything, 'cause I have no idea who you are.
dlewis1498 10 months ago
@dlewis1498
Whoops, responded to the wrong person. Not sure how that happened, sorry about that.
loner1878 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Are you being obtuse on purpose are are you really that thick skulled? MOST scientific research indicates that there is a genetic basis for homosexualitynd the "nurture" perspective is quickly falling out of favor. You're the one turning a blind eye and a deaf ear to repeated medical research in favor of one little study that suits your views.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 The only study you name so it can be verified is Bogaert at Brock University and it's full of problems . Reseacher bias since Anthony Bogaert is a homosexual activist . Bogaert uses snowball sampling by advertising for his participants in homosexual magazines . To see this study ripped to shreds google ( Ignorant Critics Could having older brothers make you gay ) I will repeat again there is no gay gene and no genetic conection to homosexuality has ever been proven.
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Try and learn to read, I clearly cited various studies. While most evidence present today indicates that homosexuality is likely genetic (you can kick and scream all you like but that won't change what most of the evidence shows) there is of course not a final consensus. You stubbornly proclaiming there is no "gay gene" is flat out ignorant and bordering on fanatic.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Funny that you are unable to site this study that shows genetics are responsible for homosexuality , maybe thats because it doesn't exsist ? Now your just wasting my time so please feel free to fuck off .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Wow, you're definitely acting stupid on purpose or have zero understanding of the subject. I just explained that genetics is rarely as simple as one gene and CLEARLY STATED that research is still being conducted but favoring a genetic explanation. I showed you various studies that indicated genes played a major role. And what do you do? Stuff your fingers in your ears and cover your eyes. Truly pathetic. Go take a basic biology class, you need it.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Take a reading comprehension class you desperately need it . You are unable to back up any of your assertions with any science . If you ever find a study that says homosexuality is genetic post it i would love to see it but until then you don't seem to have any thing relavent to add to the discussion .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Yeah, just coviniently ignore the multiple studies I posted earlier from medical, peer reviewed journals. Are you selectively blind or just playing dumb?
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 You coviniently forgot to name the studies in a way they could be looked up you jerk off . There is no homosexual gene and there is no study that proves there is one case closed
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Well ask me to PM you the journals, you genius. And I see you've also ignored the basic explanation I gave you about genetics. There is very likely a genetic contribution for homosexuality (not dependent one one gene but multiple). Kick and scream about it all you like, kid. LOL "case closed." Amazing how so many people are proud to be ignorant.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 Asshole you just put the person who did the study and where and when it was done in your text and everyone can see it , sheesh what are you 13 yrs old ? I see you have gone from saying it's genetic to say it's likely genetic which i guess is your way of conceeding that you don't know your ass from a whole in the ground .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Ooh, ad hominems. The pathetic debate tactic that those who know they have nothing of substance to say use. You do realize there's a text limit? Hard enough to sum up the studies. All you had to do was ask, sweetheart. And ease on the ad hominerms, it kind of makes you look desperate ;)
My opinion is that homosexuality is genetic, the current research available says its likely genetic. Try and read more closely. Try and get your own head out of your ass before criticizing others.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 David Halperin PHD Stanford University ( 1980) found a weak father and strong mother, with an unresolved Oedipus complex will lead to a weak, and then homosexual, son, because the mother has too strong of an image, compared to the weak state of the father. Halpern is also a Guggenheim fellow .
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Oh please, thats an old theory that is pretty flimsy at best. I studied Halperin, he was a Freudian psychologist who has a large following from many Christian interest groups, but his theory has been largely debunked by the psychological community at large, as it provides only a result, not a cause. Halperin failed to produce any scientific evidence, only examples.
How do you then explain homosexuality in men who have fathers present and "strong"? What causes lesbianism then?
loner1878 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone J. Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard studied the gayness between MZ twins, DZ twins, and non-related adopted brothers. They found that 52% of MZ twins were both self-identified homosexuals, 22% of DZ twins were so, and only 5% of non-related adopted brothers were. This evidence, repeated and found to be true a second time, showed that the more closely genetically linked, the more likely they both are to be gay or straight. Later experiments showed similar evidence in females.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 In 1991, J. Michael Bailey and Richard C. Pillard published a study that examined identical and
fraternal twin brothers and adopted brothers in an effort to establish a genetic link to
homosexuality. Fifty-two percent of the identical twins were reportedly homosexual, while only
22 percent of fraternal twins fell into the same category.
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@loner1878 But since identical twins have identical
genetic material, the fact that nearly half of the identical twins were heterosexual effectively
refutes the idea that homosexuality has a genetic basis. So much for your wikipedia . lol
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
LOL, you think that refutes homosexuality as genetic, that half of identical twins turn out heterosexual? You're more of an idiot than I thought. Zero understanding of genetics (which I was nice enough to explain to your dumb ass) and proud of it, I see.
loner1878 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Hamer hypothesized upon examining the family trees of the same men that on each subject's mother's side, there were markedly larger numbers of homosexual men, all stemming through the maternal lineages. This observation, along with his startling discovery on Xq28, led his findings to be dubbed the "gay gene study". The statistical probability of the 5 genetic markers on Xq28 to have matched randomly was calculated to be 1/100,000, lending even more support to his findings.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 A study conducted in 1993 by openly "gay" activist and researcher Dr. Dean Hamer of the National Cancer Institute examined the X chromosomes of 40 pairs of homosexual brothers. The study, which appeared in the March 1993 issue of the journal Science, found that 33 of the pairs of brothers had genetic markers for male homosexuality.
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@loner1878 A new study attempting to replicate Hamer's was released today by the same Science magazine, discrediting the 1993 study. The study conducted by scientists from the Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences at the University of Western Ontario and the Department of Genetics at Stanford Medical School concluded that "data do not support the presence of a gene of large effect influencing sexual orientation."
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
Comment removed
loner1878 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Ah, found your article there. Please note: "SOURCE: Family Research Council"
Also, nice right wingnut page it was posted on. Very telling.
loner1878 10 months ago
@loner1878 The Boston Globe reported in February that the media-ballyhooed "gay gene" theory was already in trouble. The Globe article featured the findings of Dr. Richard Pillard, a professor of psychiatry at Boston University's School of Medicine, whose twin studies showed "that sexuality is greatly influenced by environment, and that the role of genetics is, in the end, limited."
imN0Ttheone 10 months ago
@imN0Ttheone
Mind giving a date for that article? Because I just looked up a 2003 article that cites Dr. Pillard and he states that homosexuality is often inherited.
You might want to get off your christian extremist wes