You will probably understand my comment if you try to see the world as it is instead of some kind of dreamworld. (That is why this video is a flash animation and not a documentary.)
And then, when you see reality as it is, then you will find other and better ways to change your country. This belief that a 'superhero' will save your day will never come true.
Why? I could be one of that bosses who is ridiculized in this hate propaganda clip, but in fact give wealth and good environment (more food from less land and less trees cut).
Besides this environmental problem with wind power it is between 2 and 3 times as expensive as nuclear poser. Less than twice the energy price will force our western industries to close down. The production that moves to China and India is for sure a lot less energyn efficient and clean, so wind power means more pollution.
Let's just cut the political crap here, we must really stop to use cars moved by traditional engines, they do pollute whatever if you believe or not believe in global warming.
Thank you anyway to consider this issue seriously.
Btw. During the last cold snap the wind power plants in my country produced 3 percent (three percent!) of its nominal effect. Almost no usable energy when the need peaked. In the whole of Europe the situation was the same.
That's a problem with wind power, which also is environmentally non-efficient. The variation in output has to be regulated with "fast" coal power. Denmark has builded coal power plants to regulate wind power, and they now emits more both CO2 and pollution that gives cancer.
I love this video! It's so true--Obama can't do it all by himself! We've all got to do our part to make the changes happen. Electing him is just the first step.
Fossile fuel enabled your mother to give you a safe birth. Fossile fuel has bringed feasable energy and wealth to the world which would have not been there otherwise.
Fossile fuel is necessary for the poor world to achieve a high standard and human wealth, and fossile fuel makes us be able to grow more food on less areaa and to *not* cut down our trees, and thus survive as civilization.
This is true. I've worked with biology and the nature in my profession, and has a B Sc.
That last comment was very negative. I have hope. He can not do it without the public supporting him. He is going to try and do the almost impossible. And he needs us behind him even if we don't like everything that is going to need to be done. Its going to be uncomfortable for awhile while he trys to do whats best for most of us.
Sorry to say, but Obama won't change anything. He is as bribed and corrupt as any other president. He will also just follow orders as any other president.
A lot of special interest groups supported him and now he needs to pay them back.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He's like any soon corrupted socialist leader. The energy politics without fossile fule will damage the whole economy, becase alternative are far too expensive. Also ethanol and windpower doesn't reduce CO2 much; are ineffective ways to do it and therefor makes better and more environment friendly ways to do it not affordable.
Quite frankly, Obama looks like a moron, not a leader.
Hei magnusea, I put solar panels on my roof and I drive a Prius... what do you do to help our country and environment besides writing such stupid comments?
Hi virtualsheetmusic! I try to help people realize that CO2 is no threat to climate, so that we might avoid politically controlled plan economy which the greens suggests. I have for years achieved knowledge in climate science. IPCC lies.
Prius don't reduce CO2 in US. >70 percent of electricity is fossile, and the ackumulated energy efficiency makes diesel a better CO2 choise. A large BMW use less gas than Prius:
I think you need to learn more... maybe some good reading will help you to get on the right track since 95% of science says the opposite of what you are saying. Of course, if you want to join that 5%, be my guest, go ahead.
You really need to learn more: even if we used 100% fossil produced electricity, we would pollute less than use gasoline cars. Even simply because we would shift pollution from our streets to the power plants, usually located away from residential areas... that's nothing political, get some scientific book and reading. Even NASA say that. NASA is primarily financed from the US Army... I don't think they are under the dependencies of Al Gore!
virtualsheetmusic. I don't think NASA publish research about that, but it doesn't matters who do. You're stucked in the idea that the interests of those who say something makes it true or not? That's structuralism (marxism).
Even if electricity non-fossile BMW emits less CO2 than the Prius. That's my point! Check the link.
Efficiency: Fossile to electr.: 20%. Electr. distribution: 90%. Electric car 60%. Multiply it: 11%.
virtualsheetmusic. I proved that you're wrong. It's so simple that anyone can count it! Here's a source on energy efficiency of the diesel cars and the electricity cars, respectively:
regeringen . se/
content/1/c6/09/11/45/05c6423c.pdf
The 90% efficiency of electricity distribution is common knowledge. Check any power company.
I also proved that Prius needs more fuel than a larger BMW Diesel.
We don't need any NASA report. I'm also sure NASA has no such research. Please refer to it.
NASA was mentioned because it reported about global warming caused by fossil fuels (human generated).
Your PDF file is unreadable though. I'd like to know how much MPG BMW diesel gets, Prius gets an average of 40-45MPG. Also, consider the following: Diesel is very polluting, much more than gasoline (even if Co2 is equal).
virtualsheetmusic. We discussed if the fossile comsumption is larger if you use a electric car in US than if you use a Diesel. I proved it is. So if NASA is CO2 alarmistic has nothing to do with that question. (I think u r stupid, but most ppl are today, unfortenately.)
Diesel polluts less, due to all recent experimental studies where diesel and gasoline exhausts are compared. I can mail papers from professors on this! (Besides this diesel cars also emits less of the good CO2.)
Well, I never said you are stupid, but I say that here NOW and I will cut the crap here definitively: electric cars pollute less, that's a fact. Your sources are probably from those people that says the contrary, that 5% of researchers. The 95% says that electric cars pollute less which is the truth. Diesel pollute MORE than gasoline. Learn, read more. Any further crap from you will be definitely ignored by myself.
virtualsheetmusic. You still seem to mix up the possibility that CO2 cause warming (where a popularized figure is 95%) with the issue electric cars using fossile electricity vs. diesel cars.
BTW: Climatology professor von Storch and Bray for Nature did research which shows that every second climatologist don't believe us humans mostly cause climate change:
tinyurl [DOT] com/2g8xad
You have no source that 95% of scientists say fossile electr. for electric cars is better than diesel cars.
(2/2) Swedish renowned energy- and environmental professor Per Kågesson sais the opposite to what you say. I can mail it!
My source was a document by Elfordonsintressenternas Riksförbund and Svenska Elfordonsföreningen. This is translated Swedish Electric Vehicles Stakeholder Society and Swedish Electric Vehicles Association. If you suspect these organizations to be players in your postmodern/Marxism interrest conspiracy ideas, then...
Okay. I gave you direct proof in the test in Times Online, that Prius takes more fossile fuel than a BMW 520d. And you reply that I'm stupid when I say that a Prius that *also* use fossile elecricity emits more CO2...
I have also proved my case with simple figures for energy efficiency for different vehicles. Figures from electric car lobbyists.
virtualsheetmusic. The pdf file is Swedish, but you should be ablee to get relevant information out of charts, or translate the text. My numbers are correct -- but I don't know if you are able to realize why 20% energy efficiency is better than 11%.
MPG from BMW and Prius. Watch the link I suggested you to check (not to Swedish text, but a British article and film clip). Link where u put dots where there are spaces:
"Comment removed by author"
free speech huh... nice censorship ya bastard
VilhamAnderson 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the San Diego Comic Con superman super hero obama toy is at ImagineGate Toys
ImagineGate 2 years ago
Woot! Go Barack Obama! :)
ZRipper25 2 years ago
Yes, go Obama indeed!
gameshowguy2000 2 years ago
Comment removed
chips108 2 years ago
Comment removed
chips108 2 years ago
You will probably understand my comment if you try to see the world as it is instead of some kind of dreamworld. (That is why this video is a flash animation and not a documentary.)
And then, when you see reality as it is, then you will find other and better ways to change your country. This belief that a 'superhero' will save your day will never come true.
lagurz 3 years ago
lagurz...KUDOS TO YOU...Tks for posting Great video and to the real smart ppl>>>Pres. does need our colaboration!!keep the good job
classicallady 3 years ago
1deane: "So, you can thank it for everything of the last century..."
Remember that intelligent people enabled this. Without fossile fuel we wouldn't have had (or now have) this wealth at all!
1deane: "...and you can say we would have been better off going in a better direction in the first place".
Which other direction? There is none.
magnusea 3 years ago
You have no argument for your statements.
magnusea 3 years ago
Why? I could be one of that bosses who is ridiculized in this hate propaganda clip, but in fact give wealth and good environment (more food from less land and less trees cut).
magnusea 3 years ago
1deane: "So, you can thank it for everything of the last century..."
Remember that intelligent people enabled this. Without fossile fuel we wouldn't have had (or now have) this wealth at all!
1deane: "...and you can say we would have been better off going in a better direction in the first place".
Which other direction? There is none.
Also NO ONE CAN LOSE because CO2 isn't destroy anything! We can lose freedom, and this clearly is hate propaganda.
magnusea 3 years ago
Besides this environmental problem with wind power it is between 2 and 3 times as expensive as nuclear poser. Less than twice the energy price will force our western industries to close down. The production that moves to China and India is for sure a lot less energyn efficient and clean, so wind power means more pollution.
magnusea 3 years ago
Plus that large birds dies, we have concrete and steele and lubricating oil in our nature and the noise "Whoosh Whoosh Whoosh" disturbs.
magnusea 3 years ago
Let's just cut the political crap here, we must really stop to use cars moved by traditional engines, they do pollute whatever if you believe or not believe in global warming.
Thank you anyway to consider this issue seriously.
virtualsheetmusic 3 years ago
Btw. During the last cold snap the wind power plants in my country produced 3 percent (three percent!) of its nominal effect. Almost no usable energy when the need peaked. In the whole of Europe the situation was the same.
That's a problem with wind power, which also is environmentally non-efficient. The variation in output has to be regulated with "fast" coal power. Denmark has builded coal power plants to regulate wind power, and they now emits more both CO2 and pollution that gives cancer.
magnusea 3 years ago
I love this video! It's so true--Obama can't do it all by himself! We've all got to do our part to make the changes happen. Electing him is just the first step.
utubewtchr 3 years ago
Fossile fuel enabled your mother to give you a safe birth. Fossile fuel has bringed feasable energy and wealth to the world which would have not been there otherwise.
Fossile fuel is necessary for the poor world to achieve a high standard and human wealth, and fossile fuel makes us be able to grow more food on less areaa and to *not* cut down our trees, and thus survive as civilization.
This is true. I've worked with biology and the nature in my profession, and has a B Sc.
magnusea 3 years ago
...*have* a B Sc. (Sorry, my native language is Swedish.)
magnusea 3 years ago
what is the plan?? how can we support a plan we can't see. I want to support a good plan but I can's support a cute video..
polarbeardaddy 3 years ago
polarbeardaddy: I found a brief outline of Obama's environmental plan at change [DOT] gov/agenda/energy_and_environment_agenda/
iamthebyron 3 years ago
Be the change you want to see.
Jillofalltrades1117 3 years ago
That last comment was very negative. I have hope. He can not do it without the public supporting him. He is going to try and do the almost impossible. And he needs us behind him even if we don't like everything that is going to need to be done. Its going to be uncomfortable for awhile while he trys to do whats best for most of us.
PatW106 3 years ago
Awesome vid!
crimsong19 3 years ago
Sorry to say, but Obama won't change anything. He is as bribed and corrupt as any other president. He will also just follow orders as any other president.
A lot of special interest groups supported him and now he needs to pay them back.
lagurz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is a typical radical socialist vid BTW.
magnusea 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He's like any soon corrupted socialist leader. The energy politics without fossile fule will damage the whole economy, becase alternative are far too expensive. Also ethanol and windpower doesn't reduce CO2 much; are ineffective ways to do it and therefor makes better and more environment friendly ways to do it not affordable.
Quite frankly, Obama looks like a moron, not a leader.
magnusea 3 years ago
Hei magnusea, I put solar panels on my roof and I drive a Prius... what do you do to help our country and environment besides writing such stupid comments?
virtualsheetmusic 3 years ago 3
Hi virtualsheetmusic! I try to help people realize that CO2 is no threat to climate, so that we might avoid politically controlled plan economy which the greens suggests. I have for years achieved knowledge in climate science. IPCC lies.
Prius don't reduce CO2 in US. >70 percent of electricity is fossile, and the ackumulated energy efficiency makes diesel a better CO2 choise. A large BMW use less gas than Prius:
timesonline co uk/tol
/driving/used_car_reviews
/article3552994 ece
magnusea 3 years ago
I think you need to learn more... maybe some good reading will help you to get on the right track since 95% of science says the opposite of what you are saying. Of course, if you want to join that 5%, be my guest, go ahead.
fablau 3 years ago
You really need to learn more: even if we used 100% fossil produced electricity, we would pollute less than use gasoline cars. Even simply because we would shift pollution from our streets to the power plants, usually located away from residential areas... that's nothing political, get some scientific book and reading. Even NASA say that. NASA is primarily financed from the US Army... I don't think they are under the dependencies of Al Gore!
Good work.
virtualsheetmusic 3 years ago
virtualsheetmusic. I don't think NASA publish research about that, but it doesn't matters who do. You're stucked in the idea that the interests of those who say something makes it true or not? That's structuralism (marxism).
Even if electricity non-fossile BMW emits less CO2 than the Prius. That's my point! Check the link.
Efficiency: Fossile to electr.: 20%. Electr. distribution: 90%. Electric car 60%. Multiply it: 11%.
Diesel car has 20% efficiency = more than 11%.
magnusea 3 years ago
virtualsheetmusic. I proved that you're wrong. It's so simple that anyone can count it! Here's a source on energy efficiency of the diesel cars and the electricity cars, respectively:
regeringen . se/
content/1/c6/09/11/45/05c6423c.pdf
The 90% efficiency of electricity distribution is common knowledge. Check any power company.
I also proved that Prius needs more fuel than a larger BMW Diesel.
We don't need any NASA report. I'm also sure NASA has no such research. Please refer to it.
magnusea 3 years ago
NASA was mentioned because it reported about global warming caused by fossil fuels (human generated).
Your PDF file is unreadable though. I'd like to know how much MPG BMW diesel gets, Prius gets an average of 40-45MPG. Also, consider the following: Diesel is very polluting, much more than gasoline (even if Co2 is equal).
virtualsheetmusic 3 years ago
virtualsheetmusic. We discussed if the fossile comsumption is larger if you use a electric car in US than if you use a Diesel. I proved it is. So if NASA is CO2 alarmistic has nothing to do with that question. (I think u r stupid, but most ppl are today, unfortenately.)
Diesel polluts less, due to all recent experimental studies where diesel and gasoline exhausts are compared. I can mail papers from professors on this! (Besides this diesel cars also emits less of the good CO2.)
magnusea 3 years ago
Well, I never said you are stupid, but I say that here NOW and I will cut the crap here definitively: electric cars pollute less, that's a fact. Your sources are probably from those people that says the contrary, that 5% of researchers. The 95% says that electric cars pollute less which is the truth. Diesel pollute MORE than gasoline. Learn, read more. Any further crap from you will be definitely ignored by myself.
virtualsheetmusic 3 years ago
virtualsheetmusic. You still seem to mix up the possibility that CO2 cause warming (where a popularized figure is 95%) with the issue electric cars using fossile electricity vs. diesel cars.
BTW: Climatology professor von Storch and Bray for Nature did research which shows that every second climatologist don't believe us humans mostly cause climate change:
tinyurl [DOT] com/2g8xad
You have no source that 95% of scientists say fossile electr. for electric cars is better than diesel cars.
magnusea 3 years ago
(2/2) Swedish renowned energy- and environmental professor Per Kågesson sais the opposite to what you say. I can mail it!
My source was a document by Elfordonsintressenternas Riksförbund and Svenska Elfordonsföreningen. This is translated Swedish Electric Vehicles Stakeholder Society and Swedish Electric Vehicles Association. If you suspect these organizations to be players in your postmodern/Marxism interrest conspiracy ideas, then...
translate [dot] google [dot] com
magnusea 3 years ago
Okay. I gave you direct proof in the test in Times Online, that Prius takes more fossile fuel than a BMW 520d. And you reply that I'm stupid when I say that a Prius that *also* use fossile elecricity emits more CO2...
I have also proved my case with simple figures for energy efficiency for different vehicles. Figures from electric car lobbyists.
magnusea 3 years ago
virtualsheetmusic. The pdf file is Swedish, but you should be ablee to get relevant information out of charts, or translate the text. My numbers are correct -- but I don't know if you are able to realize why 20% energy efficiency is better than 11%.
MPG from BMW and Prius. Watch the link I suggested you to check (not to Swedish text, but a British article and film clip). Link where u put dots where there are spaces:
timesonline co uk/tol
/driving/used_car_reviews
/article3552994 ece
magnusea 3 years ago
wow...great flash animation, but am skeptical as to the message....
JoeyPencils 3 years ago
What are you skeptical about? Survival?
tboggia 3 years ago
no that superman is gonna save us...we shouldn't be leaving ANYTHING to big government
JoeyPencils 3 years ago