i feel sorry for all the arts majors who wont contribute to anything this valuable to humanity. This is one of the things i would love to be involved with after college.
The sun uses nuclear fusion, natural hydrogen is one proton which is 99.9% of hydrogen isotope, the remaining Deuterium and Tritium, are the >.1%, and half life of tritium is 12 years means at 5 billion years tritium will not have a trace in the sun like in the earth, then how does the sun do nuclear fusion, I am confused??
@noname4096 There are different ways nuclear fusion can happen. The sun uses a reaction that utilizes a reaction between 4 neutrons and 2 electrons to produce a helium atom, 2 neutrinos, 6 photons, and energy.
but in both of them are they not combining to form a new molecule anyway? atleast they have something in common, unless im wrong, science isnt my best subject
I don't understand everything in the video but it's kind of frightening knowing that future generations will be able to use the same power that the sun produces on earth. Scary thinking about it.
For the last 3.8 billion years nature has used in that turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam to do nuclear fusion. 2011 Sheffield University is researching how a steam plasma would fill out man to use nuclear fusion. Producing inert helium and oxygen. Plus loads of power. And no plutonium. The most toxic substance known to man.
The problem we are having is that major corporations still have enough OIL to make a few more Trillion dollars. We will not see any of this great technology come into fruition on till the last drop of OIL is gone OR until we stand up together as one human race against this GIANT beast called MAJOR CORPORATIONS. Sadly the majority of us don’t have the balls to do anything about this matter and use these sites as scapegoat to express our discontent.
@TheKingsofAces Corporations are only as powerful as they are because government and central bankers ENABLE them by making money out of thin air & by passing laws & providing subsidies that protect them.
Answer, people need to not only find courage but also get themselves into government office and stop the corruption, allow for competing currencies tied to assets (gold/silver/copper), & shrink government size & power. Remember, historically it's government that has always impoverished people.
1:34 “Now with the participation of scientist it must be shown that ECONOMIC continues operation on a power plant scale is capable” You know what this translates to? Very simple, if the power plant does not generate enough money for the major corporation then all this will be a waste of time and more money. The problem we are encountering right now is not that we don’t have the capabilities of coming up with new innovative ways of creating clean reusable energy.
Nature contains everything that the human need to insure his survival as well as the progress in accordance to the direct relationship with his knowledge and the levelS of his interest to decipher the codes that are cleverly hidden in the nature itself. It would not be possible without the ultimate device “Brain” to guaranty the results, all it needs is that two basic ingredients and the machine will rewire and generates its own “neuron pathways” for ANY innovative ideas one desiers.
This kind of nuclear is preferred, and its too bad the other kind is proven and working. Hope we find a way to minimize its use. Also wondering if writings saying Germany hopes to be nuclear free, Fission and fusion, or just Fission?
Why not use that neutron that comes of from the end product to create fission, maybe use artificial diamond so when you break the bonding it gives off alot of energy, just a thought
Star Scientific provide cheap and virtually limitless energy. As the source of the fuel is dueterium in ALL THE WORLDS OCEANS we have enough of it for millions of years. As far as energy is concerned there will be MORE THAN ENOUGH even for the projected population of 9 billion by 2050. See Star Scientific's "In the Footsteps of Fusion" Youtube video; read the chairman's of Star Scientific's blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath": where all this is explained.
I can't help but be a little bitter that the rapidly growing populations are in India and China. I mean they need to start making some laws that control populations. And I know that's not a simple thing to do. Because a lot of the time cultures that have many children do it because that's their form of social security and retirement. No one else will take care of them as they get older. Energy won't solve the population problem. Energy won't solve our food problem either.
Yes roynexus6 I agree. You can find Star Scientific youtube videos by searching for "In the Footsteps of Fusion". Also you can google Star Scientific Limited and also the blog of their chairman "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath"
Looks like Australian company Star Scientific LTD., is going to beat everyone to the punch. Muon Catalyzed Fusion is the answer. Most importantly is the answer that is ready NOW, not in 25 or 50 years from now.
Please correct e if I'm wrong, but the thing for me is,
this isn't sustainable as, is we are still going to be using the rocks and water or whatever..... and to turn them back to their original elements would take the same amount of energy as is released?
To me the answer is things like solar, wind or tidal power which are inexhaustible.
@yippyjp Solar, wind and tidal power are not inexhaustible neither; it just takes a long time (about 5 billion years, when our sun dies) Same with nuclear fusion (which is ironically what sun does): it would take billions of years for the fuel, mostly sea water, to run out, and that's the last thing to worry about right now.
I can't answer your first question, but on the second one:
Sola, wind and tidal power would be great... on a perfect world. These are really expensive to maintain, and not only that, it is also not efficient enough and most countries would be completely unable to live off these.
@yippyjp Problem is with tidal, solar and wind power we are totally at the mercy of mother nature. I personally think the way forward is geothermal power and nuclear fission or fusion, coal is good but it releases posions into the atmosphere. A man has developed a way to extract power from nuts by burining them. There is so much green renewable enegry out there, it's about time we stopped using fossil fuels.
I wonder how much energy is required to power the coil magnetic field to prevent the plasma from ever touching the walls? Or in other words, how efficient is this power "station" ?
@TookMe20min2findThis So far, a positive energy output is yet to be achieved, probably with ITER (ca. 10 times more output than input). The bigger the reactor, the more efficient, because it loses heat slower than smaller ones. A good analogy here are mice: they have to eat a lot more (with respect to their own weight) than us humans because they have a larger surface area. The coils don't use a lot of energy since they're built with superconducting materials.
If you think the peace i talk is a good thing and you support this i would like to know. You can e-mail me at Charles.joshua.brock@gmail.com
Who knows,, if you take action to this and i get enough replys, i might make more effort to get this rolling in the right direction. I part of me hopes to see the peace of human kind living together and advanceing to a larger scale of knowladge and exsploration.
We need to develope a new way of voting within our countries and eventualy globaly. A way that will bring the people closer to there governments and weed out all the greed and power corruptions. Human life is about peace and wellbing of all life not greed and physical stature.
@dkoribag1 Most corporate leaders are sociopaths. They all lack empathy and they really don't care they are harming the planet as long as they stay rich. To be a politician you have to have a certain personality. MOST not all corporate leaders are bad and not all politicians are but political positions tend to attract a certain personality. People that WANT to lead always tend to be douche bags. It is up to the people. We need to start rioting like they did in Greece and Egypt.
planet. This is the peoples world and we must transistion our governments into working together to eaxspand our race into space and science peacfully without weapons.
Every individual human has a choice to make now. We have to decide if we want to continue with prehistoric mentality and way of thinking and living. Or we we unite as a human race to exspand and understand science more . You people must stop looking at the news and research on your own who to vote into office. We all have rights as Humans and share the planet together, thus we must learn to live in peace and learn how to advance our race into technoligies that will allow us the controll of our
@geonerd I agree that magnetic confinement fusion is a waste of money but I suggest you have a look at Focus Fusion. It uses a dense plasma focus to fuse hydrogen and boron fuel. The great thing about it is that the process produces charged particles which can be converted directly into electricity rather than heating water to turn a turbine and then a generator. It's much smaller and much cheaper than any method of nuclear fusion and will probably ready for commercial use in 10 years.
@hkpopfan4lif3 Because of people like Turtlein, a few comments down, who think that fusion is a theory and not realistic. And also because we're probably not going to have commercial fusion plants until around 2050 at least.
@hkpopfan4lif3 Well, we don't yet have the technology to make widespread fusion reactors. When we do, they can easily satisfy all of our energy needs. However, we'll also have to convince the general public that they're safe. People are mortally afraid of nuclear fission powerplants, which are nowhere near as bad as people think they are, and they'd also be afraid of nuclear fusion plants, even though they're much safer, simply because the word "nuclear" is in the name,
We are still trying to create a nuclear fusion reactor. Fukushima is a nuclear fission reactor.
The only waste product from nuclear fusion is helium ....
I honestly havn't read a stupider comment on youtube yet today then yours just now.
You seriously don't know the BASIC differences between nuclear FISSION and nuclear FUSION? I knew these primary concepts when I was 9, and I know they teach this stuff at even younger ages now.
@mdma4life I'm not taking any lessons from some wasted junkie like you. Take all the pills you want and go party at some power plant. Not all of us are keen on the nuclear matter and fusion is only a theory not a real process.
LOL, its just a random name I made (though I do find the MDMA molecule fascinating in its ability to prevent 4' hydrolysis by the resonance stabilized methoxy bridge ... anyways)
As for fusion, tell that to the thermonuclear bombs that were detonated before/during the cold war, these are fusion devices
OR tell that to the sun, which uses nuclear fusion at its core. In fact, no element heavier then helium would exist if fusion didn't occur
the original planned site for the iter experimantal reactor was japan,thatnk god they decided to build it in france,&you thin they would double or quadruple the budget for this stuff,if thry did i wonder if the time frame of when we could see it in widespread practical use could be cut in half,also i wonder what the net energy gain is after you take into account the energy spent on the manufacture and transportation of the fuel,ive heard everything from 2050 to 2035 before we see this being used
There is a university in florida that has created safe energy by fusion. They use helium and boron 11 and the by product? helium. look it up on google there is a link to the independents website where ia read the article.
@ThorkilKowalski Aww, is the united states getting all grumpy on how it it is the 'best country in the world', when in reality, the frontiers of technology and science lie at the 'pity' hands of the EU. How sad indeed :(
@ThorkilKowalski So what? Universities in America aernt going to invent nuclear fusion. They would have to start where the EU started. And it would take them at least 10-20 years to get there, and by then, we may have mastered fusion as a primary power source.
What has universities got to do with it, as I recall, its not universities that are developing the technology, its the top scientists from all over the world.
And if your danish, how come it says your from america on your channel? Fail.
And the US is pretty big on fusion as well, they just have some other approaches than the magnet, tokamak approaches which Europe goes for. America bets more on laser controlled plasma.
You are absolutely wrong. It IS the universities which are developing this technology. It is science groups at the universities.
These ranking are based on graduate studies and research mainly - what's funny is that American universities have the highest ratio of non-US student to US students in the world, so a substantial amount of their brainpower is actually foreign :P
Expanding global population is just about the largest single contributing factor to both pollution and the energy crisis yet moral views to this matter continues to go unadressed. Much of this is due to the way peoples' minds are being conditioned by marketting, entertainment, news & environment.
@Afrocanuk Agreed. People in the sciences are spending their lives looking after an increasingly spoiled bunch of worthless spoiled little bastards, so easily brainwashed and poisoned by big business.
@Afrocanuk If that is the case, then please explain why those populations exposed to the marketing, entertainment, news and envoronment that shape these moral values, are growing at a far slower rate than those populations that are not exposed to such media.
The west's populations growth rate is far lower than the world average, yet it is here where people are more likely to be exposed to these 'moral' views of the type you quoted.
@connchri In certain developed western countries, there has long been a steady and easily attainable supply of contraceptive. In addition, if western abortion rates were added to its birth-rates, then the birth statistics would more closely match those globally. Abortion has long been the topic of many demonstrations in North-America over past decades. There's also a chance that the figures you're going by are unrealistically conservative.
@Afrocanuk The real culprits of pollution is population as you mention but its only few countries that are the problem, the main two would be China and India there populations are growing so rapidly that their energy requirements are huge,the problem is also escalating as adults have 10 or more children with the mentality that when they're old and frail they will be able to look after them financially, and not only that but that means millions more live in poverty every year.
WRONG. You people piss me off, go read a book. As The human species develops the demand for energy is naturally going to increase-see the kardashev scale.
No.1 Reason for Pollution and the preceived energy crisis is a real lack of forethought on behalf of politicians.
@Afrocanuk CO2 is not pollution, it INCREASES rain water & plant growth, the problem is RATE of output, but the atmosphere can be mined for CO2 (artificially & biologically) & turned into fuel, driven by solar power. Nuclear fission also aids in the production of CO2 to fuel. Climate change is over-hyped. Energy is key to stabilizing/reducing populations & ending poverty.
Look at all the comments you fools make, you know how I got to this video: by typing in Japan, and you guy still say '' cant they put small nuclear plants in cars ? '' where s this world going to end....
@zachaqsw yes they can but i dont know if you want to have an atomic bomb traveling with your family our knowledge of nuclear power is too poor to make it safety enough.
@helloThought P.S. I am not European either, haha. I do agree with the fact that alot of people might find the term "color blind" rasist, but no one is perfectly black or white, so technically, they would still be included. All colors turned monochrome would include every ethnicity. Anyhoo, the whole of that paragragh is talking about what you just helped prove. You still picked out a group for something. We're just bread that way.
...are a South American dish which leads me to believe you think I AM South American. If so, that "dirty" remark must be your idea of South Americans as a whole. They wouldn't be too happy to hear that. I needn't spell out where I am from, because it doesn't matter. For the record though, I use soap, body washes, shampoos, conditioners, and something called "toothpaste". I like starting disputes online, but when they turn into hateful, personal nit-picking wars, it's no longer fun. LAME
@nicholirage I enjoyed the effort you put into your remark. If you've noticed, there isn't much space in here for full sentences. Besides. if you've read a book you'd know as long it makes sense, you can chop alot off a sentence. Revert that comment to someone who texts. That said, I wonder how many people you may have offended in saying "non-Americans" dont use soap and smell like tortilla chips. Just because there is soap IN America doesn't guarentee you use it, and tortilla chips ...
What the hell? It sounds like a marital counseling session in here! Here we are, presented with important science...and all I am seeing is bickering about racism and two peoples' from different countries xenophobia. What pisses me off, is what I have read on other discussion boards about fusion. Some non-Americans are pretty ignorant to all the money America has spent on fusion to this point. They ignore the American contribution to ITER, have never heard of NIF at LLNL, and are also totall
Not exactly. You'd need VERY enriched material to sustain a reaction fast, large, and powerful enough to be a nuke. Otherwise the worst that can happen with the low-grade fuel is that your reactor overheats, possibly explodes (high pressure, not nuclear), or otherwise melts, and radiation leaks everywhere.
So it's more like asking, "when can I buy a dirty bomb?" lol
Why hasnt anyone thought of trying to capture the raw power of Chuck Norris to power the USA? All he has to do is kick an atom, and you have instant fusion.
@R3MUS2007 lol i can tell ur a nerd----- when chuck norris dies i wanna see the look on u and the other nerd clans face, hes one person that was in a movie or tv show.. id kick chuck norris's old ass bitch...so get off his dick
Whats this guy talking about? Fusion doesnt get passed unity does it? There is a very good chance this isnt going work. Maybe the scale is too small to get a stable reaction.
what i dont understand is in the begining it shows deuterium and tritium fuse theres only 1 atom each, example, 0 =deuterium 0 = tritium.. fuse, 0 >< 0 to create a bigger atom O .. but then right after he starts explaining it again but the deuterium has 3 atoms in 1, and the tritium has 2 in 1.. WTF which is it i dont wana get this test wrong on this esay cause its worth alot of my grade an i have to DIAGRAM the steps of the process, what am i gunna do start off wit 1 then magicly change to 3
@987bowen It's symbolic. They might show deuterium and tritium as single orbs in the first animation, but they aren't. Hydrogen has 1 proton. So has the 2 hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium. What sets the 3 hydrogen isotopes apart are the number of neutrons. Hydrogen has 0, deuterium has 1 and tritium has 2. When fusion between deuterium and tritium occurs you get helium. Helium prefers 2 protons and 2 neutrons in the nucleus, so 1 neutron will split off and be on its merry way... Usually
in able for nuclear fusion to occur, immense heat energy has to be generated meaning the fusion reactors has to get the 10 million degrees heat energy somwhere else causing a big flaw. so to get energy you need to waste even more energy like fossil fuels. meaning that the effiency of nuclear fusion is crap. so unless you can get 10 million degrees from renewable resources like windmills then nuclear fusion will work
@EFSpartan so maybe you could use something such as fission to get to the heat and then, when tecnology (sorry for spelling) allows it let the fusion power itself and execess power given to the suroundings could be used as the form of energy. Then again i dunno, im only little lol
@thebritishdannyboy2 No You are right, That is what they are planning to do, using fission to kick start a fusion reaction at least that's what they do with a Thermal Nuclear Bombs (H-Bombs)
US NAVY SPAWAR Cold Fusion Research Center has reported byproducts of a fusion reaction having taken place in their experiments.
Pons and Fleischman were right! The MIT study which supposedly debunked cold fusion has been proven to be a fraud, please read the scientific papers on it!
Even scientists are capable of being brainwashed. Just threaten them with ridicule...It works! Most scientists won't even look at Cold Fusion thanks to this tactic.
@heyshutupyou They essentially are using hydrogen plasma, but if you're asking why they can't use normal hydrogen that has only one proton and no neutrons, it's because it won't work. They have to use the Deuterium and Tritium isotopes of hydrogen in order to provide the neutrons needed to make the helium product, the spare neutron, and the resulting energy release. Without the neutrons in those two isotopes, there won't be enough nuclear binding energy to make the helium and release energy.
Good video, however, it didn't say much about efficiency.
I definitely believe that Nuclear fusion should be researched even further since it is much safer than nuclear fission.
It'll still have a relatively large impact on the environment since one still needs to extract the elements. Which means mines for the lithium, and factories by our oh so beloved shorelines (slight sarcasm), but really, we'd need to see the whole entire world make the shift. To be continued...
It would be interesting to see what the percentage of CO2 emissions is for the production side of our economy is vs. the consumption side, eg. transportation. If it worked out that the production side was the worse of the two evils, then fusion energy is a good idea since it would be possible to get most stationary buildings on the fusion supplied grid. However, if it's the other way around, how could we make our transportation run on fusion energy. We know that electric cars are inefficient TBC
@thebiycyclefreak The internal combustion engine has been around for well over 100 years. Mass produced electric cars have only been around less than 10 years. Give the technology another decade and it will be far superior to anything that runs on dead plants.
@kossmikham "Mass produced electric cars have only been around less than 10 years. " Actually they've been around as long AS the internal combustion engine. They had problems though, one was the range, and 2 was the sluggishness. The reason why the internal combustion engine won was simple. Once the tank runs empty, go to station, fill up, drive for another long distance. They simply had better range.
:( for all of you fussing over this but are interested. Please google search, under google video: Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)
It will be the first link. it should be 93min. Do post back and let me know what you think!
just like to joke. Same goes for racism. I'm metaphorically colour blind. Dont give a rats ass what ethnicity you are, you're still the host for a potentially interesting person. I hate when people are like.." oh, dont be a racist! stop picking on black people!" That statement in itself is just as discriminatory for singling the group out in the first place. people just gotta take shit less seriously. Seriously!
@Mindraken Just so you know, any time you call yourself "colorblind", and black person is going to automatically think you a racist. It's a really fucking dumb thing to say.
Nice to hear its planned to use this in combination with other approaches & not treated like a silver bullet!
StopClowningAround 2 weeks ago
I want this video on my E770 unit.
yronwyatt49b 2 weeks ago
i prefer fission myself.
keltoid777 3 weeks ago
@keltoid777 fission produces lots of radioactive waste.
korth66 4 days ago
i feel sorry for all the arts majors who wont contribute to anything this valuable to humanity. This is one of the things i would love to be involved with after college.
tharwpoop 1 month ago
Iter
CookingTasty 1 month ago
lol, all i dont get is why were they showing the SUN if they arent using the trihydorgen fusion? (the 1 that is in the sun) :D
megvagyimmartizenyol 1 month ago
hi
popcoolmar 1 month ago
why would anybody dislike this video
64ig6kg0 1 month ago
@64ig6kg0 cuz they either hate cheap energy or didnt understand it
wienerdogs4eva 1 month ago
i'm gonna assume celsius seeing how this is a European machine
errydaysaholiday 1 month ago
The sun uses nuclear fusion, natural hydrogen is one proton which is 99.9% of hydrogen isotope, the remaining Deuterium and Tritium, are the >.1%, and half life of tritium is 12 years means at 5 billion years tritium will not have a trace in the sun like in the earth, then how does the sun do nuclear fusion, I am confused??
noname4096 1 month ago
@noname4096 There are different ways nuclear fusion can happen. The sun uses a reaction that utilizes a reaction between 4 neutrons and 2 electrons to produce a helium atom, 2 neutrinos, 6 photons, and energy.
mtmatthewjturner 1 month ago
100,000,000 degrees Celsius or Fahrenheit?
errydaysaholiday 1 month ago
GE ENERGY 5:30
for Fusion Reactor theory
edmond2713 2 months ago
GE ENERGY 5:30
edmond2713 2 months ago
technically, burning oil is a form of fusion because its combining oxygen with carbon to make carbon dioxide?
TheBradyoHead 2 months ago
@TheBradyoHead Wrong, thats a chemical reaction, not a radioactive one. Fusion is a radioactive reaction.
Zzarillo 2 months ago
@Zzarillo oh right thanks for pointing that out
but in both of them are they not combining to form a new molecule anyway? atleast they have something in common, unless im wrong, science isnt my best subject
TheBradyoHead 1 month ago
I was looking for jazz fusion, but I'm baked so it's all good.
pencert 2 months ago
I don't understand everything in the video but it's kind of frightening knowing that future generations will be able to use the same power that the sun produces on earth. Scary thinking about it.
DWarrior4 2 months ago
Cool
foxtrote81 2 months ago
For the last 3.8 billion years nature has used in that turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam to do nuclear fusion. 2011 Sheffield University is researching how a steam plasma would fill out man to use nuclear fusion. Producing inert helium and oxygen. Plus loads of power. And no plutonium. The most toxic substance known to man.
JonThm 3 months ago
Overpopulation is why I won't have children.
onsenfoudunom1 3 months ago
@onsenfoudunom1 Even tho the world is overpopulated nobody will sleep with you, so you don't have to worry about it.
QarbitraryQ 3 months ago
The problem we are having is that major corporations still have enough OIL to make a few more Trillion dollars. We will not see any of this great technology come into fruition on till the last drop of OIL is gone OR until we stand up together as one human race against this GIANT beast called MAJOR CORPORATIONS. Sadly the majority of us don’t have the balls to do anything about this matter and use these sites as scapegoat to express our discontent.
TheKingsofAces 4 months ago 16
@TheKingsofAces Corporations are only as powerful as they are because government and central bankers ENABLE them by making money out of thin air & by passing laws & providing subsidies that protect them.
Answer, people need to not only find courage but also get themselves into government office and stop the corruption, allow for competing currencies tied to assets (gold/silver/copper), & shrink government size & power. Remember, historically it's government that has always impoverished people.
jaeLAX23 3 months ago
@TheKingsofAces You my friend, are the first person that i have seen on youtube, that actually knows what their talking about
xlildeebomb13x 1 month ago
1:34 “Now with the participation of scientist it must be shown that ECONOMIC continues operation on a power plant scale is capable” You know what this translates to? Very simple, if the power plant does not generate enough money for the major corporation then all this will be a waste of time and more money. The problem we are encountering right now is not that we don’t have the capabilities of coming up with new innovative ways of creating clean reusable energy.
TheKingsofAces 4 months ago
Nature contains everything that the human need to insure his survival as well as the progress in accordance to the direct relationship with his knowledge and the levelS of his interest to decipher the codes that are cleverly hidden in the nature itself. It would not be possible without the ultimate device “Brain” to guaranty the results, all it needs is that two basic ingredients and the machine will rewire and generates its own “neuron pathways” for ANY innovative ideas one desiers.
bijmah 4 months ago
Go to Vermont. Man about nuclear fusion
JonThm 4 months ago
Nature is full of nuclear fusion
JonThm 5 months ago
@JonThm sure is, thats something Im learning about, recently I learnt the actual fusion of pee!
boots992134 3 months ago
oh nooooo! how could we ever surpress our advertising future?
Caasiopia68 5 months ago
MY GOD, ARE THEY USING WINDOWS ON THEIR COMPUTERS? What if they get a BSOD?
huahuahuhauahuahau
felcas 5 months ago
This kind of nuclear is preferred, and its too bad the other kind is proven and working. Hope we find a way to minimize its use. Also wondering if writings saying Germany hopes to be nuclear free, Fission and fusion, or just Fission?
newage4energy 5 months ago
Why not use that neutron that comes of from the end product to create fission, maybe use artificial diamond so when you break the bonding it gives off alot of energy, just a thought
darklordsomeone 6 months ago
haha if it doesn't work it would of been a REALLY big waste of time and money lmao
Hardy123Zhao 6 months ago
Star Scientific provide cheap and virtually limitless energy. As the source of the fuel is dueterium in ALL THE WORLDS OCEANS we have enough of it for millions of years. As far as energy is concerned there will be MORE THAN ENOUGH even for the projected population of 9 billion by 2050. See Star Scientific's "In the Footsteps of Fusion" Youtube video; read the chairman's of Star Scientific's blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath": where all this is explained.
2110kop 6 months ago
I can't help but be a little bitter that the rapidly growing populations are in India and China. I mean they need to start making some laws that control populations. And I know that's not a simple thing to do. Because a lot of the time cultures that have many children do it because that's their form of social security and retirement. No one else will take care of them as they get older. Energy won't solve the population problem. Energy won't solve our food problem either.
shogun996 6 months ago
Yes roynexus6 I agree. You can find Star Scientific youtube videos by searching for "In the Footsteps of Fusion". Also you can google Star Scientific Limited and also the blog of their chairman "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath"
2110kop 6 months ago
Looks like Australian company Star Scientific LTD., is going to beat everyone to the punch. Muon Catalyzed Fusion is the answer. Most importantly is the answer that is ready NOW, not in 25 or 50 years from now.
roynexus6 6 months ago
is it just me or is the narrator the same guy hosting TED?
IceGene 6 months ago
comments too long not gonna read them fuck you -_- atleast the chuck norris joke wus short
vbox8 6 months ago
Please correct e if I'm wrong, but the thing for me is,
this isn't sustainable as, is we are still going to be using the rocks and water or whatever..... and to turn them back to their original elements would take the same amount of energy as is released?
To me the answer is things like solar, wind or tidal power which are inexhaustible.
yippyjp 7 months ago
@yippyjp Solar, wind and tidal power are not inexhaustible neither; it just takes a long time (about 5 billion years, when our sun dies) Same with nuclear fusion (which is ironically what sun does): it would take billions of years for the fuel, mostly sea water, to run out, and that's the last thing to worry about right now.
maximkazhenkov11 7 months ago
@yippyjp
I can't answer your first question, but on the second one:
Sola, wind and tidal power would be great... on a perfect world. These are really expensive to maintain, and not only that, it is also not efficient enough and most countries would be completely unable to live off these.
RamiroR 6 months ago
@yippyjp Problem is with tidal, solar and wind power we are totally at the mercy of mother nature. I personally think the way forward is geothermal power and nuclear fission or fusion, coal is good but it releases posions into the atmosphere. A man has developed a way to extract power from nuts by burining them. There is so much green renewable enegry out there, it's about time we stopped using fossil fuels.
NANOFORGE 5 months ago
I wonder how much energy is required to power the coil magnetic field to prevent the plasma from ever touching the walls? Or in other words, how efficient is this power "station" ?
TookMe20min2findThis 7 months ago
@TookMe20min2findThis So far, a positive energy output is yet to be achieved, probably with ITER (ca. 10 times more output than input). The bigger the reactor, the more efficient, because it loses heat slower than smaller ones. A good analogy here are mice: they have to eat a lot more (with respect to their own weight) than us humans because they have a larger surface area. The coils don't use a lot of energy since they're built with superconducting materials.
maximkazhenkov11 7 months ago
Do whatever you can to help and contrtribute to science and to getting the right people into office in your citys and countrys.
dkoribag1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you think the peace i talk is a good thing and you support this i would like to know. You can e-mail me at Charles.joshua.brock@gmail.com
Who knows,, if you take action to this and i get enough replys, i might make more effort to get this rolling in the right direction. I part of me hopes to see the peace of human kind living together and advanceing to a larger scale of knowladge and exsploration.
dkoribag1 7 months ago
We need to develope a new way of voting within our countries and eventualy globaly. A way that will bring the people closer to there governments and weed out all the greed and power corruptions. Human life is about peace and wellbing of all life not greed and physical stature.
dkoribag1 7 months ago 26
@dkoribag1 Most corporate leaders are sociopaths. They all lack empathy and they really don't care they are harming the planet as long as they stay rich. To be a politician you have to have a certain personality. MOST not all corporate leaders are bad and not all politicians are but political positions tend to attract a certain personality. People that WANT to lead always tend to be douche bags. It is up to the people. We need to start rioting like they did in Greece and Egypt.
shogun996 6 months ago
@dkoribag1 Were talking about energy not politics.
valkriestar 3 months ago
@dkoribag1 Governments should be afraid of their people.
Angustevo 2 months ago
@dkoribag1 i think we have to save our planet
popcoolmar 1 month ago
planet. This is the peoples world and we must transistion our governments into working together to eaxspand our race into space and science peacfully without weapons.
dkoribag1 7 months ago
Every individual human has a choice to make now. We have to decide if we want to continue with prehistoric mentality and way of thinking and living. Or we we unite as a human race to exspand and understand science more . You people must stop looking at the news and research on your own who to vote into office. We all have rights as Humans and share the planet together, thus we must learn to live in peace and learn how to advance our race into technoligies that will allow us the controll of our
dkoribag1 7 months ago
I request this to be implimented into america.
dkoribag1 7 months ago
once we find an easy way to produce positrons, nuclear, fossil and renewable energy won't be necessary.
kidi1232 7 months ago
what is the name of the song that starts playing at 7:47
ultraviolet7327 7 months ago
Nature does fusion from water
JonThm 7 months ago
BS! Fusion has ALWAYS been ~20 years away.... I'll believe it when I see it.
geonerd 7 months ago
@geonerd I agree that magnetic confinement fusion is a waste of money but I suggest you have a look at Focus Fusion. It uses a dense plasma focus to fuse hydrogen and boron fuel. The great thing about it is that the process produces charged particles which can be converted directly into electricity rather than heating water to turn a turbine and then a generator. It's much smaller and much cheaper than any method of nuclear fusion and will probably ready for commercial use in 10 years.
Phi1point62 7 months ago
Nature does nuclear fusion from water
JonThm 8 months ago
A flame of oil or gas does nuclear other lower
JonThm 8 months ago
hahahahaha tokamac is the most successful? this is a propiganda video
not even the jap institute of tech has exceeded inniation energy
every weak farnsworth type fusor has exceeeded these
badboybilzer 8 months ago
It works. We hawe a smal reactor in norway. A propper size will do the jobb.
hrflikk 8 months ago
ПРИГЛАШАЮ ВСЕХ В СВОЮ ЛУЧШУЮ КОМАНДУ В КОМПАНИИ TALK FUSION,
БЛАГОДАРЯ КОТОРОЙ ВЫ НАЙДЁТЕ СЕБЯ В
ИНТЕРНЕТЕ И ВЫЙДЕТЕ НА ТАКОЙ ДОХОД КАК: 50000$ В НЕДЕЛЮ! ЭТО НЕ МИФ,А РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ!
РАБОТАЕМ ТОЛЬКО С МИРОВЫМИ ТОП-ЛИДЕРАМИ!
МОЙ СКАЙП: SNAKE201121
MegaSnake2011 8 months ago
It wont work
davepamn 8 months ago
So for those who know more than I do, why do we not talk more about manifesting nuclear fusion for an alternative energy?
This seems so convincing to me.
Everyone just talks about solar, hydro, wind etc...
fusion seems highly accurate and controllable, and the only reason I know why people use fusion is for bombs so far
hkpopfan4lif3 9 months ago
@hkpopfan4lif3 Because of people like Turtlein, a few comments down, who think that fusion is a theory and not realistic. And also because we're probably not going to have commercial fusion plants until around 2050 at least.
DaWolf805 9 months ago
@hkpopfan4lif3 Well, we don't yet have the technology to make widespread fusion reactors. When we do, they can easily satisfy all of our energy needs. However, we'll also have to convince the general public that they're safe. People are mortally afraid of nuclear fission powerplants, which are nowhere near as bad as people think they are, and they'd also be afraid of nuclear fusion plants, even though they're much safer, simply because the word "nuclear" is in the name,
CobaltX07 7 months ago
The turbulent flow of steam does nuclear fusion
JonThm 9 months ago
wow 500 megawatt eek
fireicer 9 months ago
Fusion is WAY more powerful than fission and will create less waste. Nuclear fission creates waste and isn't renewable as fusion is.
Leitilumo 9 months ago
Comment removed
Turtelin 9 months ago
@Turtelin you do acknowledge that nuclear fusion is superior to Nuclear fission? and that little in the form of waste and radiation is generated?
Xenthoid 9 months ago
@Turtelin that was fission this is fusion completely different things fusion emits no radioactive substances
ste3fc 9 months ago
@Turtelin
We are still trying to create a nuclear fusion reactor. Fukushima is a nuclear fission reactor.
The only waste product from nuclear fusion is helium ....
I honestly havn't read a stupider comment on youtube yet today then yours just now.
You seriously don't know the BASIC differences between nuclear FISSION and nuclear FUSION? I knew these primary concepts when I was 9, and I know they teach this stuff at even younger ages now.
Are you handicapped?
mdma4life 9 months ago
@mdma4life I'm not taking any lessons from some wasted junkie like you. Take all the pills you want and go party at some power plant. Not all of us are keen on the nuclear matter and fusion is only a theory not a real process.
Turtelin 9 months ago
@Turtelin
LOL, its just a random name I made (though I do find the MDMA molecule fascinating in its ability to prevent 4' hydrolysis by the resonance stabilized methoxy bridge ... anyways)
As for fusion, tell that to the thermonuclear bombs that were detonated before/during the cold war, these are fusion devices
OR tell that to the sun, which uses nuclear fusion at its core. In fact, no element heavier then helium would exist if fusion didn't occur
You tried so hard, yet failed so bad :(
mdma4life 9 months ago
sadly nothing is strong enough to hold such heat from fusion =(
wesi1234 9 months ago
@wesi1234 magnetic field and hold the plasma in mid air :P
ste3fc 9 months ago
What's great about nuclear fusion is that radioactive by-products are far far less than nuclear fission.
ChaosDynamics 9 months ago
Let's keep our children from harm. Please watch "Radiation Animation". Thank you.
mirra88888 9 months ago
Very informative, great video, thanks.
MatthewSforcina 9 months ago
so why are we using nuclear fission? why not just go all fusion if it is so good, there has to be a down side :P
ste3fc 10 months ago
@ste3fc why? because we cannot yet acquire more energy from from the reactor than we put in.
EuropeanBrit 9 months ago
@EuropeanBrit oh i know now, learnt about it the other day but thanks anyway :)
ste3fc 9 months ago
@ste3fc Yeah, it's extremely difficult to initiate.
I think.
Fusion is what happens at the center of stars, and it takes ALOT of energy to begin.
viking4211 9 months ago
the original planned site for the iter experimantal reactor was japan,thatnk god they decided to build it in france,&you thin they would double or quadruple the budget for this stuff,if thry did i wonder if the time frame of when we could see it in widespread practical use could be cut in half,also i wonder what the net energy gain is after you take into account the energy spent on the manufacture and transportation of the fuel,ive heard everything from 2050 to 2035 before we see this being used
bulletproof2353 10 months ago
There is a university in florida that has created safe energy by fusion. They use helium and boron 11 and the by product? helium. look it up on google there is a link to the independents website where ia read the article.
MrJambones 10 months ago
Chill out guys, its a video about fusion.
Grimdopple 10 months ago
Just posted "The Boron Song" (aka "The Boron Rap") with lyrics. Have fun!!!
miyazaki999 10 months ago
If fusion is ever invented it will not be by the socialistic EU.
ThorkilKowalski 10 months ago
@ThorkilKowalski Aww, is the united states getting all grumpy on how it it is the 'best country in the world', when in reality, the frontiers of technology and science lie at the 'pity' hands of the EU. How sad indeed :(
KoolKidKarl2k8 10 months ago
@KoolKidKarl2k8
I am studying science in the EU, I am a Dane living in Finland. And currently most of the top-20 universities are in the United States.
Google "Best universities"
And I should warn you: facts may hurt.
ThorkilKowalski 10 months ago
@ThorkilKowalski So what? Universities in America aernt going to invent nuclear fusion. They would have to start where the EU started. And it would take them at least 10-20 years to get there, and by then, we may have mastered fusion as a primary power source.
What has universities got to do with it, as I recall, its not universities that are developing the technology, its the top scientists from all over the world.
And if your danish, how come it says your from america on your channel? Fail.
KoolKidKarl2k8 10 months ago
@KoolKidKarl2k8
Lol. I does? That's wierd. Well, I am Danish.
And the US is pretty big on fusion as well, they just have some other approaches than the magnet, tokamak approaches which Europe goes for. America bets more on laser controlled plasma.
You are absolutely wrong. It IS the universities which are developing this technology. It is science groups at the universities.
ThorkilKowalski 10 months ago
@ThorkilKowalski
These ranking are based on graduate studies and research mainly - what's funny is that American universities have the highest ratio of non-US student to US students in the world, so a substantial amount of their brainpower is actually foreign :P
ChaosDynamics 9 months ago
carbon dioxide is NOT BAD
SuperJohn719 10 months ago
Its NOT going to work. They wont be able to scale it up enough.
mcwolfus 10 months ago
Im white, my cat is black :D
ILFZ2 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
islam rule the world
MsAllahhuakhbar 10 months ago
what we need to develop is miro fusion cells that would solve everything
StonersToke420 10 months ago
Expanding global population is just about the largest single contributing factor to both pollution and the energy crisis yet moral views to this matter continues to go unadressed. Much of this is due to the way peoples' minds are being conditioned by marketting, entertainment, news & environment.
Afrocanuk 10 months ago 19
@Afrocanuk Agreed. People in the sciences are spending their lives looking after an increasingly spoiled bunch of worthless spoiled little bastards, so easily brainwashed and poisoned by big business.
mcwolfus 10 months ago
@Afrocanuk you ourself believe in this propaganda?
alexandersydney 8 months ago
@Afrocanuk lack of sexual education and responsability is the reason
sidewaysfcs0718 8 months ago
@Afrocanuk If that is the case, then please explain why those populations exposed to the marketing, entertainment, news and envoronment that shape these moral values, are growing at a far slower rate than those populations that are not exposed to such media.
The west's populations growth rate is far lower than the world average, yet it is here where people are more likely to be exposed to these 'moral' views of the type you quoted.
connchri 7 months ago
@connchri In certain developed western countries, there has long been a steady and easily attainable supply of contraceptive. In addition, if western abortion rates were added to its birth-rates, then the birth statistics would more closely match those globally. Abortion has long been the topic of many demonstrations in North-America over past decades. There's also a chance that the figures you're going by are unrealistically conservative.
Afrocanuk 7 months ago
@Afrocanuk The real culprits of pollution is population as you mention but its only few countries that are the problem, the main two would be China and India there populations are growing so rapidly that their energy requirements are huge,the problem is also escalating as adults have 10 or more children with the mentality that when they're old and frail they will be able to look after them financially, and not only that but that means millions more live in poverty every year.
TheMattFrom1996 6 months ago
@Afrocanuk
WRONG. You people piss me off, go read a book. As The human species develops the demand for energy is naturally going to increase-see the kardashev scale.
No.1 Reason for Pollution and the preceived energy crisis is a real lack of forethought on behalf of politicians.
marmaladekamikaze 6 months ago
@Afrocanuk CO2 is not pollution, it INCREASES rain water & plant growth, the problem is RATE of output, but the atmosphere can be mined for CO2 (artificially & biologically) & turned into fuel, driven by solar power. Nuclear fission also aids in the production of CO2 to fuel. Climate change is over-hyped. Energy is key to stabilizing/reducing populations & ending poverty.
/watch?v=BOoBTufkEog
/watch?v=RYBnCJAZD1A&feature=related
jaeLAX23 3 months ago
Seriously guys? I came here to learn more about Nuclear Fusion and it's turned into an ignorance competetion between the US and Europe? Seriously?
Adonchin 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at all the comments you fools make, you know how I got to this video: by typing in Japan, and you guy still say '' cant they put small nuclear plants in cars ? '' where s this world going to end....
Bvzijverden 10 months ago
cant they put small nuclear plants in cars ? lol idk
zachaqsw 10 months ago
@zachaqsw yes they can but i dont know if you want to have an atomic bomb traveling with your family our knowledge of nuclear power is too poor to make it safety enough.
Xajacs 10 months ago
@zachaqsw LOL Thats a good one.
ekweyu 10 months ago
@helloThought P.S. I am not European either, haha. I do agree with the fact that alot of people might find the term "color blind" rasist, but no one is perfectly black or white, so technically, they would still be included. All colors turned monochrome would include every ethnicity. Anyhoo, the whole of that paragragh is talking about what you just helped prove. You still picked out a group for something. We're just bread that way.
Mindraken 10 months ago
...are a South American dish which leads me to believe you think I AM South American. If so, that "dirty" remark must be your idea of South Americans as a whole. They wouldn't be too happy to hear that. I needn't spell out where I am from, because it doesn't matter. For the record though, I use soap, body washes, shampoos, conditioners, and something called "toothpaste". I like starting disputes online, but when they turn into hateful, personal nit-picking wars, it's no longer fun. LAME
Mindraken 10 months ago
@nicholirage I enjoyed the effort you put into your remark. If you've noticed, there isn't much space in here for full sentences. Besides. if you've read a book you'd know as long it makes sense, you can chop alot off a sentence. Revert that comment to someone who texts. That said, I wonder how many people you may have offended in saying "non-Americans" dont use soap and smell like tortilla chips. Just because there is soap IN America doesn't guarentee you use it, and tortilla chips ...
Mindraken 10 months ago
Could be a huge waste of money. This type fusion may never work.
Ibringthetruth1 10 months ago
unaware the Americans have been researching fusion since the early 1950s.
I actually saw a video on South Korea's contribution to ITER where a comment actually said:
Way to go South Korea! America would never invest in fusion research. They like being addicted to fossil fuels too much.
If you want to criticize my country, FINE!...but don't pull a bunch of bs you just made up and which is totally false to do so!
MrDanP1 10 months ago
What the hell? It sounds like a marital counseling session in here! Here we are, presented with important science...and all I am seeing is bickering about racism and two peoples' from different countries xenophobia. What pisses me off, is what I have read on other discussion boards about fusion. Some non-Americans are pretty ignorant to all the money America has spent on fusion to this point. They ignore the American contribution to ITER, have never heard of NIF at LLNL, and are also totall
MrDanP1 10 months ago
@ps3man75
Not exactly. You'd need VERY enriched material to sustain a reaction fast, large, and powerful enough to be a nuke. Otherwise the worst that can happen with the low-grade fuel is that your reactor overheats, possibly explodes (high pressure, not nuclear), or otherwise melts, and radiation leaks everywhere.
So it's more like asking, "when can I buy a dirty bomb?" lol
macgeek2004 10 months ago
Life does nuclear fusion via a lightning discharge
JonThm 11 months ago
Why hasnt anyone thought of trying to capture the raw power of Chuck Norris to power the USA? All he has to do is kick an atom, and you have instant fusion.
R3MUS2007 11 months ago 17
@R3MUS2007 Thats Duke Nukems job.
NANOFORGE 11 months ago
@R3MUS2007 lol i can tell ur a nerd----- when chuck norris dies i wanna see the look on u and the other nerd clans face, hes one person that was in a movie or tv show.. id kick chuck norris's old ass bitch...so get off his dick
liltunechi4 7 months ago
when can i buy a fusion/fission powered car?
imaqtlolz 11 months ago
@imaqtlolz That's like saying, where can i buy a nuclear bomb?
ps3man75 10 months ago
@ps3man75
i said "when"
imaqtlolz 10 months ago
Life does nuclear fusion
JonThm 11 months ago
Comment removed
mcwolfus 11 months ago
Whats this guy talking about? Fusion doesnt get passed unity does it? There is a very good chance this isnt going work. Maybe the scale is too small to get a stable reaction.
mcwolfus 11 months ago
hey i got a question, if you extract D2 from water, will we run out of water in a long run??
jerylboy92 11 months ago
@jerylboy92 no?
unfluencedarea 11 months ago
Turbulent steam does nuclear fusion
JonThm 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sonyoooo3 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sonyoooo3 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sonyoooo3 1 year ago
Utsuho Reiuji causes Nuclear Fusion, nuff said.
skythesniperguy 1 year ago 5
what i dont understand is in the begining it shows deuterium and tritium fuse theres only 1 atom each, example, 0 =deuterium 0 = tritium.. fuse, 0 >< 0 to create a bigger atom O .. but then right after he starts explaining it again but the deuterium has 3 atoms in 1, and the tritium has 2 in 1.. WTF which is it i dont wana get this test wrong on this esay cause its worth alot of my grade an i have to DIAGRAM the steps of the process, what am i gunna do start off wit 1 then magicly change to 3
987bowen 1 year ago
@987bowen It's symbolic. They might show deuterium and tritium as single orbs in the first animation, but they aren't. Hydrogen has 1 proton. So has the 2 hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium. What sets the 3 hydrogen isotopes apart are the number of neutrons. Hydrogen has 0, deuterium has 1 and tritium has 2. When fusion between deuterium and tritium occurs you get helium. Helium prefers 2 protons and 2 neutrons in the nucleus, so 1 neutron will split off and be on its merry way... Usually
jnv1971 1 year ago
in able for nuclear fusion to occur, immense heat energy has to be generated meaning the fusion reactors has to get the 10 million degrees heat energy somwhere else causing a big flaw. so to get energy you need to waste even more energy like fossil fuels. meaning that the effiency of nuclear fusion is crap. so unless you can get 10 million degrees from renewable resources like windmills then nuclear fusion will work
Psalm789 1 year ago
@Psalm789 No it takes huge amounts of energy to kick start the Reaction, once Nuclear Fusion starts its self sustaining.
EFSpartan 1 year ago
@EFSpartan so maybe you could use something such as fission to get to the heat and then, when tecnology (sorry for spelling) allows it let the fusion power itself and execess power given to the suroundings could be used as the form of energy. Then again i dunno, im only little lol
thebritishdannyboy2 1 year ago
@thebritishdannyboy2 No You are right, That is what they are planning to do, using fission to kick start a fusion reaction at least that's what they do with a Thermal Nuclear Bombs (H-Bombs)
EFSpartan 1 year ago
Excellent work! These fusion engineers are truly inspiring! The Tokamak is pure beauty.
acidrain1976 1 year ago
@acidrain1976 I agree whole-heartedly; a thank you to all those who are working on this scientific endevor!
TechPriest89 1 year ago
US NAVY SPAWAR Cold Fusion Research Center has reported byproducts of a fusion reaction having taken place in their experiments.
Pons and Fleischman were right! The MIT study which supposedly debunked cold fusion has been proven to be a fraud, please read the scientific papers on it!
Even scientists are capable of being brainwashed. Just threaten them with ridicule...It works! Most scientists won't even look at Cold Fusion thanks to this tactic.
AlienScientist 1 year ago
Go back and read what I said. I specifically said "mass produced electric cars". Do you understand what "mass produced" means?
kossmikham 1 year ago
Hi I am racist American.
Army1128 1 year ago
why can you not use ionized hydrogen gas for fusion?
heyshutupyou 1 year ago
@heyshutupyou They essentially are using hydrogen plasma, but if you're asking why they can't use normal hydrogen that has only one proton and no neutrons, it's because it won't work. They have to use the Deuterium and Tritium isotopes of hydrogen in order to provide the neutrons needed to make the helium product, the spare neutron, and the resulting energy release. Without the neutrons in those two isotopes, there won't be enough nuclear binding energy to make the helium and release energy.
Intrafacial86 1 year ago
@heyshutupyou becuase ionized hydrogen is nothing more than a proton; therefore with no neutrons there cannot be fusion
kennyroks111 1 year ago
I can't help they pay me
rolandas1985 1 year ago
chicago at the begining of the vid?
ktoschris 1 year ago
Good video, however, it didn't say much about efficiency.
I definitely believe that Nuclear fusion should be researched even further since it is much safer than nuclear fission.
It'll still have a relatively large impact on the environment since one still needs to extract the elements. Which means mines for the lithium, and factories by our oh so beloved shorelines (slight sarcasm), but really, we'd need to see the whole entire world make the shift. To be continued...
thebiycyclefreak 1 year ago
It would be interesting to see what the percentage of CO2 emissions is for the production side of our economy is vs. the consumption side, eg. transportation. If it worked out that the production side was the worse of the two evils, then fusion energy is a good idea since it would be possible to get most stationary buildings on the fusion supplied grid. However, if it's the other way around, how could we make our transportation run on fusion energy. We know that electric cars are inefficient TBC
thebiycyclefreak 1 year ago
so charging the car would still be required. and what about planes, buses, boats, trucks...might be a bit of a clusterf--k.
thebiycyclefreak 1 year ago
@thebiycyclefreak The internal combustion engine has been around for well over 100 years. Mass produced electric cars have only been around less than 10 years. Give the technology another decade and it will be far superior to anything that runs on dead plants.
kossmikham 1 year ago
@kossmikham "Mass produced electric cars have only been around less than 10 years. " Actually they've been around as long AS the internal combustion engine. They had problems though, one was the range, and 2 was the sluggishness. The reason why the internal combustion engine won was simple. Once the tank runs empty, go to station, fill up, drive for another long distance. They simply had better range.
EpiDemic117 1 year ago
:( for all of you fussing over this but are interested. Please google search, under google video: Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)
It will be the first link. it should be 93min. Do post back and let me know what you think!
fusionmaster1000 1 year ago
The load crack of thunder is accompanied by the release of helium, light and heat. So lightening does nuclear fusion from water
JonThm 1 year ago
The turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam produces heat, helium and oxygen. Molecular nuclear fusion. It powers nature.
JonThm 1 year ago
This will not work, sorry to disappoint everyone.
STEVEGET 1 year ago
LIghtning does fusion
JonThm 1 year ago
@JonThm actually i believe it does fission... it splits atoms thats what the loud crack of thunder is
shadowOrgon 1 year ago
"we've never observed one element change into another" - Kent Hovind.
I remember being absolutely stunned by this "top creationist".
It is really stunning what big claims they make.
Search for "craziest claim by creationist ever". I promess you will loose your faith (lol) in humanity!
RTRVII 1 year ago
just like to joke. Same goes for racism. I'm metaphorically colour blind. Dont give a rats ass what ethnicity you are, you're still the host for a potentially interesting person. I hate when people are like.." oh, dont be a racist! stop picking on black people!" That statement in itself is just as discriminatory for singling the group out in the first place. people just gotta take shit less seriously. Seriously!
Mindraken 1 year ago 29
@Mindraken Just so you know, any time you call yourself "colorblind", and black person is going to automatically think you a racist. It's a really fucking dumb thing to say.
helloThought 10 months ago
next step to inexhausible energy... fusion
terrodar19 1 year ago