Seems that they repeated the experiment at low air pressure and humidities and found that while humidity plays an important role in sand droplet formation, air pressure does not.
this is demonstrating the gravitational pull of planets in space. what i dont get is some of the very small particles flew past the large clusters.. I dont think this correctly demonstrates what it is trying to.
I'd bet it doesn't behave like this in a vacuum. My guess is that turbulence creates initial irregularities in the stream which are then enhanced by air resistance. Grains at the bottom of a "drop" experience greater drag and are slowed, while grains immediately behind those are effectively drafting. The drop size is largely a function of the extent of the drafting effect.
I don't know for sure if this video is of the experiment done in a vacuum, but they did perform this in a vacuum as well and the grouping still occurs.
Yeah, I realized that after I posted. I ended up sending a link to a physical chemist who might be in a better position to theorize on the subject than I am.
Maybe this has to do with the fact that when sand is in very fine particles, they mimic the behavior of atoms (even though grains of sand are incomparably larger than atoms) in a liquid and when poured, a stream of sand forms drops the same way other liquids do to increase aerodynamics.
your right czechwindboy, I find it hard to believe that this has anything to do with gravity; the rate of collision of the grains with each other will cause them to go further apart and gravity would have no effect. The sand must be surrounded by some cohesive liquid or something :?
I don' think there is any liquid. There must be something else in play. I'm thinking that the sand lumps together because of friction w/ the air. Perhaps the lumps, up to a certain size, have lower resistance/friction with the air through which they falling.
true but as far as I know sand, silicon oxide, is a crystal and forms a lattice (right? :P) so so could vdW forces be strong enough to keep them together? let alone pull them together from a distance?
Of course it can't be responsible for pulling from a distance, it works for distances up to 5 angstroms. i don't know how exactly surface of sand grain looks like, but I can imagine it has many "spikes" or "rough edges". I think interactions between two surfaces could be pretty strong and in effect bind grains in the cluster together.
Awesome
Jmmatarao213 8 months ago
How did you guys get my bathing suit?
duhCider 2 years ago
ハードコアゆめにっき
pumoo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
STUUUPPPPPID
RockN311 2 years ago
Air resistance? I wonder if it would act the same in a vacuum.
Now maybe I'll go RTFA...
wutdaflek 2 years ago
Seems that they repeated the experiment at low air pressure and humidities and found that while humidity plays an important role in sand droplet formation, air pressure does not.
mirshafie 2 years ago 2
Did he die?
tjhynson 2 years ago
this is demonstrating the gravitational pull of planets in space. what i dont get is some of the very small particles flew past the large clusters.. I dont think this correctly demonstrates what it is trying to.
kevinwhited16 2 years ago
i dOnt gEt it .
pinoyako717 2 years ago
I never knew sand had so much in common with my feces after a long night of enchiladas!
BinkieMcFartnuggets 2 years ago
I hate you.
TehSnargle 2 years ago
I Concur
Koolzii 2 years ago
FSG!
melikeyyeah 2 years ago
I'd bet it doesn't behave like this in a vacuum. My guess is that turbulence creates initial irregularities in the stream which are then enhanced by air resistance. Grains at the bottom of a "drop" experience greater drag and are slowed, while grains immediately behind those are effectively drafting. The drop size is largely a function of the extent of the drafting effect.
mtgordon 2 years ago
I don't know for sure if this video is of the experiment done in a vacuum, but they did perform this in a vacuum as well and the grouping still occurs.
Twigg808 2 years ago
Yeah, I realized that after I posted. I ended up sending a link to a physical chemist who might be in a better position to theorize on the subject than I am.
mtgordon 2 years ago
um...interesting...
7222Brit 2 years ago
Maybe this has to do with the fact that when sand is in very fine particles, they mimic the behavior of atoms (even though grains of sand are incomparably larger than atoms) in a liquid and when poured, a stream of sand forms drops the same way other liquids do to increase aerodynamics.
samrusoff 2 years ago
Gravity? Molecular cohesion?
BeondaPale 2 years ago
I'm thinking gravity and, unless it's super-special sand, there might be bigger granules than others, drawing the smaller ones to it?
leglessnotlegolas 2 years ago
very cool. I can see how the planets formed, kinda better. (:
archaedemos 2 years ago
This could explain formation of asteroids. Planets were made differently.
faolitaruna 2 years ago
AHA.. so everything we see is fake..right.
kukelz 2 years ago
intresting...
wowlaxis 2 years ago
wow
pubtor 2 years ago
Maybye there isnt gravity and they proved the theory of gravity wrong?
addiecody 2 years ago
?????????????????
LoveandEqualityToAll 2 years ago
ohh now I understand....
HogieMorgan 2 years ago
is it falling in vacuum?
gravitational or fluid dynamic effect?
foodaggression 2 years ago
wtf? lol
diskchrisco 2 years ago 2
In the beginning the granules are falling faster than the camera but later on it appears the camera matches the granule speed. Curious.
babydock214 2 years ago
I guess it shows to proof the tendency of matter to clump together?
czechwindboy 2 years ago
its gravity to each other
alexander255110 2 years ago
you sure? I wouldn't think so little sand has enough mass for gravity to come into play
czechwindboy 2 years ago 2
your right czechwindboy, I find it hard to believe that this has anything to do with gravity; the rate of collision of the grains with each other will cause them to go further apart and gravity would have no effect. The sand must be surrounded by some cohesive liquid or something :?
yousefamar 2 years ago
I don' think there is any liquid. There must be something else in play. I'm thinking that the sand lumps together because of friction w/ the air. Perhaps the lumps, up to a certain size, have lower resistance/friction with the air through which they falling.
czechwindboy 2 years ago
I don't think so. Van der Wals force and sticky coatings may play mayor role. Gravity works at bodies bigger than kilometer in diameter.
faolitaruna 2 years ago
true but as far as I know sand, silicon oxide, is a crystal and forms a lattice (right? :P) so so could vdW forces be strong enough to keep them together? let alone pull them together from a distance?
yousefamar 2 years ago
Of course it can't be responsible for pulling from a distance, it works for distances up to 5 angstroms. i don't know how exactly surface of sand grain looks like, but I can imagine it has many "spikes" or "rough edges". I think interactions between two surfaces could be pretty strong and in effect bind grains in the cluster together.
faolitaruna 2 years ago
Well, if you say so. You seem to know what you're talking about.
yousefamar 2 years ago
fool
worldwarthreeblues 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
3rd comment?
leonidmilman 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mwuhahahaha fisrt comment!!! and what is the point of this video?
jtech1000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no you fail
wowlaxis 2 years ago 3
that looks awesome, but kinda weird aswell
MagicHandedAlex 2 years ago 2