Or rather than invest all your supply in a 400 banelings you could invest all your supply in 400 banelings then use your remaining overlords to become overseers to bomb the tanks :3 then use the banelings to blow up his base
5 banelings are needed to destroy a tank but a tank (sieged) one blast can kill up to 4 or 5 banelings...so if 200 banelings vs 66 siege tanks, who has the higher chance to win???
@IliekPVP last time i checked, 330/66 was 5. let me do the math again. yup, 330/66=5 still.
the only conclusion that i can draw from your comment is that it takes 5 banelings to kill a nonshooting tank. actually, this is not even a conclusion, but a simplification.
@ghombar ok in mine reply to your bullshit line i told you that it takes 5 banelings to take out a tank, how the fuck did you assumed i told you that is a efficient or sufficient way to kill a tank.. I just told you FACTS that even the tanks were not shooting they couldnt kill them... Fuck man
It would be a lot more realistic (but practically useless) if blowing up a single baneling in a tight group would cause a domino effect that effectively kills the entire group... That'd be pretty interesting to see. :P
then a wild brood lord appears
ColaKnight 1 week ago
wats with the running around?
MsDeathangel956 2 weeks ago
S-P-L-I-T
Bilbiotheque 3 weeks ago
Baneling: "They see me rollin, they hatin-" *KABOOM*
IAmTheStig320 3 weeks ago
bad baneling control
funtime4500 3 weeks ago
nice baneling flow xd
VoiDukkha 3 weeks ago
first 200 lings and then mutate into 400 banelings, pretty simple, eh?
XxTheBigBangX 4 weeks ago
epic haha
PRFxSniper 1 month ago
the best place to put banes: Xel'Naga Watchtower....
ElitePredator98 1 month ago
most horrible. The person controlling the banelings makes a wide turn like a dumbshit
wyg0513 1 month ago 5
That was beautiful ^_^
Chalmsloff 1 month ago
how do you split your army in half like that?
madtriksmadtriks 1 month ago
do 66 tanks vs 1 void ray
DerkThunder 1 month ago 2
Gosh, it's almost like siege tanks counter Banelings or something...
RytleA 1 month ago 6
and a wild muta appears
razorIaIa 1 month ago
No way...
diman8894 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this site will kill gaming industry quidhi dot info
KroonAlcantara348 1 month ago
My new baneling defense... :D
Pboy8clipmaker 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
>>> AUTO KEYBOT <<<
The worlds BEST autoclicker
STOP hurting your fingers, let Auto Keybot do the clicking!
Try the FREE version now!
Autokeybot 1 month ago
now send in one muta
rustam19977 1 month ago 13
Lesson learned tanks beat cockroaches....
TheTurdbuster 2 months ago
:/
paulitikox 2 months ago
back then tanks dealt 60 damage, now they deal 35.
startingsprinter 2 months ago
i dont play sc but i know this is bad
k3vok1m 2 months ago
Siege tanks OP? Better nerf hydras.
wtfshouldmynamebe1 2 months ago
@wtfshouldmynamebe1 Idra is raging.
TheTomphson 2 months ago
better nerf terran
DJLTheFirst 2 months ago
BANELINGS BANELINGs ...o wait
MoDoLoMo 2 months ago
666 dislikes!
LeoMakotoMito 2 months ago
i knew this would be a stupid matchup
whYLiE09 2 months ago
husky sucks cock
constipationnow 2 months ago
someone told me if u stack ur units together they share the damage thus its better??? idk
i think this is why hes wrong, cuz seige tanks spreed their attacks out...
stratplayer13 2 months ago
@stratplayer13
If you stack your units they all take full damage.
WhatsY0UTUB3 2 months ago
really ? foxy and husky lol
raivrp 2 months ago
652 people don't realize that this is huskystarcraft.
brownieloverSC 2 months ago
@brownieloverSC 653 people don't care.
DarkonFullPower 2 months ago 43
@brownieloverSC
Because if Husky made it, it can't be shit.... right........ right?
SUFHolbek 2 months ago
@SUFHolbek Yup :D
brownieloverSC 2 months ago
@sangminyi93 And if the tanks we spread out so that they wouldent take splash this wouldent have even gone aswell as it did for the banelings.
CynicalwithApurpose 2 months ago
holly shit lol
Spychologist17 2 months ago
Or rather than invest all your supply in a 400 banelings you could invest all your supply in 400 banelings then use your remaining overlords to become overseers to bomb the tanks :3 then use the banelings to blow up his base
MrEvilslashy 2 months ago
how long did it take to clean up
c00k13thief 2 months ago
sick baneling micro
mardnm123 2 months ago
TERRAN IS OP!!
superoggeleet 2 months ago
Proof that Overseers are OP
skeve613 2 months ago
BANES BANES WHOOAAOAOAOA!!1
Omlijn 2 months ago
FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
beybladers2435 2 months ago
TOP COMMENTS MAKE FANNI !!!!!!!!
Roffeu 2 months ago
if you had the tanks on creep there would be less tanks
sangminyi93 2 months ago 93
@sangminyi93 my spidey senses tells me you want blings to be nerfed
ohAlanho 2 months ago
@sangminyi93 And if there was 2 marauders he'd have twice as many tanks.. ><
Emerno 2 months ago
@sangminyi93 why in the hell would you seige a tank on creep?
lilneo1 2 months ago
@lilneo1 somtimes your trying to just push n end the game. sure you can kill creeptumors but that takes alot of scans and time.
macronewb 1 month ago
@macronewb Or, you know, a single Raven.
dnlkr 1 month ago
@sangminyi93 If the the tanks were properly spread there would be more tanks
TheEliteSheep 1 month ago
Because tanks are already really hard to use, make them micro themselves too! Rofl, GFG.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
K now do it on creep.
OddeyeDL 2 months ago
seige tank = good unit
DustTheseNugz 3 months ago
ahahahahahaa
bojileca 3 months ago
Its Star craft 2 Wings of libery and its the best Game ever.
XxCrotosxX 3 months ago
This video should have the lord of the rings Orc theme playing
Noscope101 3 months ago
whats this game it looks interesting?
SupremeDragon7 3 months ago
WTF are the 2min after the attack good for??
davidbernhardberns 3 months ago
siege tanks should receive nerff
shootingmen 3 months ago
yo retard, wtf are u doing for past 5 min, just moving around ur baneling doing nothing
AznSwat 3 months ago
2:00 How to perma-capture a xelnaga watchtower.
Rage487 3 months ago
next time do baneling drops with 66 tanks
F1ipsydez 3 months ago
sad part is 400 zerglings probably would have done it better.
dav666777 3 months ago
corruptors vs marauders . oh yes . who will win ? the world may never know .
islandboiskreation 3 months ago
next video 1 marine vs 66 siege tanks _EDITED MARINE IS EDITED_
SargioXas 3 months ago
GG
PeeweeTheOnly1 3 months ago
400 banes with 200 support (Y) :D
reybey1 3 months ago
That feel when the top comments are related.
336forlife 3 months ago
A bit of mis-micro at 0:14...the banes went move command not attack move command
DCstarcraft2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THOSE FUCKING HOLES THEY LEAVE MAKE ME WANNA THROW UP!!!!!!#$&$%&%$
samuraimachone 3 months ago
@samuraimachone whats wrong with you
DustTheseNugz 3 months ago
lotus breast
benjamane 3 months ago
why do you keep going burrow ffs i have trypophobia
GuitarHeroDice 3 months ago
How obout 66 coruptor vs 66 siege tanks??
noobsound 3 months ago
Kinda reminds me that Matrix Revolution part where alot of sentinel trying to swarming into the base
EhrgeizShuriken89 3 months ago
They see me rollin...
Tomnitzus 3 months ago
"Your computer is slowing down the game" -.-
SoNyXDNB 3 months ago
Terran op...
Magesora1 3 months ago
sige tanks with sige mode only siges bangelings woud win easely
lucasmajic 3 months ago
commitment issues?
wlmckinnon 3 months ago
Why did you show us the useless things after the initial banelings vs tanks fight?
MrFace921o 3 months ago
2:06 its a mushroom :DD
Dubstep371 3 months ago
I think the banelings will win if they were on creep with the tank damage at 35 they now have.
Majorohminus 3 months ago
In HOTS it will be different with underground moving banelings :D
maxoomen 3 months ago
was everything beyond 0:20 really necessary?
blizrfiz 3 months ago 44
@blizrfiz did you really need to continue watching it after 20? Atleast he put the important part at the beginning.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 2 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD True, just seems like he could have cut the majority of the video our and saved a lot of time.
blizrfiz 2 months ago
@blizrfiz wtf is wrong with you? Watch the 20 seconds and leave. Nobody is forcing you to stay.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 2 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD yeah i know, just kinda pointless for everything after 20 secconds to be there.
blizrfiz 2 months ago
@blizrfiz he wanted to see what 200/200 banelings moving around would look like
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 2 months ago
5 banelings are needed to destroy a tank but a tank (sieged) one blast can kill up to 4 or 5 banelings...so if 200 banelings vs 66 siege tanks, who has the higher chance to win???
weide1994 3 months ago
Its impossible to wijn with banelings. theyd be dead anyways
Jojo123hello 3 months ago
in hots tanks are fucked.
Andriuxas9 3 months ago
i think tht was not a good tac with banes
teemumathias 3 months ago
@teemumathias You mean there shows a tactic in this video? oO
JuglarEuskaldun 3 months ago
banelings would win if they went the right direction
Fuice1 3 months ago
you do realise that you need 5 banelings to kill 1 tank? its so inefficient
IliekPVP 3 months ago
@IliekPVP 7 banelings actually
fighterkirby6 3 months ago
U had them run down a ramp you moron
nathanhegg 3 months ago
This is why u pick them up with overlords and drop in the middle
CreatingDrake 4 months ago
I kinda thought the siege tanks would blow each other up; guess not..
loopofpoop 4 months ago
i think 534 be kill by BANELINGS
alanwke 4 months ago
baneling banelings banelings OHHHHHHHH!!!!
NZbobNZ 4 months ago
let them unburrow underneath the tanks :)
mrjayoareyes 4 months ago
i dont think 400 banelings would kill 66 tanks even if the tanks are not firing.
ghombar 4 months ago 2
@ghombar if they were spread it would take 330 banelings to kill all that tanks (without shooting)
IliekPVP 3 months ago
@IliekPVP so, 5 banelings are sufficient to kill a tank?
ghombar 3 months ago
@ghombar no, i didnt say that... dont make stupid conclusions...
IliekPVP 3 months ago
@IliekPVP last time i checked, 330/66 was 5. let me do the math again. yup, 330/66=5 still.
the only conclusion that i can draw from your comment is that it takes 5 banelings to kill a nonshooting tank. actually, this is not even a conclusion, but a simplification.
go ahead, eat your own BS.
ghombar 3 months ago
@ghombar ok in mine reply to your bullshit line i told you that it takes 5 banelings to take out a tank, how the fuck did you assumed i told you that is a efficient or sufficient way to kill a tank.. I just told you FACTS that even the tanks were not shooting they couldnt kill them... Fuck man
IliekPVP 3 months ago
@IliekPVP i am just refuting your "fact" that it takes 5 banelings to kill a tank. i am not assuming that it is sufficient nor efficient.
"...even the tanks were not shooting they couldnt kill them"
"... it would take 330 banelings to kill all that tanks..."
are you really this stupid? dont you see that you are contradicting yourself?
ghombar 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IliekPVP
1. you do realise that you need 5 banelings to kill 1 tank? its so inefficient
IliekPVP 1 week ago
2. 330/66=5.
if you are not joking about this, please go to a vet and have your brain check ed.
ghombar 3 months ago
so lucky if you were the tank at the back
MrPanophobia 4 months ago 2
Now send in one muta.
schizer 4 months ago 126
The darkwatcher oh yeah
silksharp123456789 4 months ago
next video - 1 mutalisk vs 66 siege tanks
thedarkwatcher 4 months ago 342
@thedarkwatcher
well it will take him about 2 hours to kill them all
jaguar4u2012 3 months ago
@thedarkwatcher honestly thats not even funny anymore soo unoriginal,,,,
kimjb95 2 months ago
duh you suck. you should split your banelings like Automaton2000Micro splits his zerglings against siege tanks
GotNoBrained 4 months ago
wrong unit to send in vs 66 siege tanks.. try brood lords next time :)
ogmog 4 months ago
^ BANELING VORTEX
marcaronx49z 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is very hard to masturbate to.
utdwcd 4 months ago
the angle was pretty bad too 0:14 banelings went to the wrong place allowing for a lot more free shots
jorge12app 4 months ago
lol choke
minored360 4 months ago
i was convinced 7 tanks would've been enough on choke
naxsanity 4 months ago
this game is so fkn retarded
facultydOTY 4 months ago
fucking love these videos.. thought i was like the only one that did this stuff lol
NoDropShotsPlease 4 months ago
for the swaaaaaaaaarm
JeckAubrey 4 months ago
How can this video have a 851 110 viewers?
Xodiacify 4 months ago
@Xodiacify cause it's f'ing husky, dude
creamrunner 4 months ago
if only the banelings spawned in front
SolDragon7 4 months ago
for SION!!!!
123456cephiro 4 months ago
TheCoolMovement
Sadly enough... No
ELgauntlet 4 months ago
de cuanto es tu maquina para q no explote con todos eso graficos y unidades
rioter910 4 months ago
wow that was a mega fail.
megahushpuppies97 4 months ago
Am I the only one who gets hard watching 44 Banes roll around?
TheCoolMovement 4 months ago
and if zerg attack in all angels, banelings wins easy
ingo007 5 months ago
is this all husky is capable of by now in starcraft?sad
R3wster 5 months ago
DONT FUCK WITH SIEGE TANKS BITCH!!!
GCAUFilms 5 months ago
soooo itchyyyyy
henryduncan 5 months ago
protoss is op
rsNappula 5 months ago
I DIDNT SEE THAT COMING!!!
stefaeq 5 months ago
nope not enough banelings
KillerOompaLoompa 5 months ago
waiit.... banelings without will be sieges without siege right? and then siege tanks with siege will be banelings with speed what if banes get creep
TheGoodkat44 5 months ago
yeah !!
BryanAnzualdo 5 months ago
what you should learn from this ... baneling drops from overlord is MUCH more efficient against siege tanks
brucemangy 5 months ago
somehow it reminds me of uroburos on Resident Evil 5
Junokaii 5 months ago
@itsWAZZA1 split the banelings not all together
artario146 5 months ago
400 banglings vs 1 void ray
Azeon2010 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this proves that undead is op
SuperPotatoPower 5 months ago
Even with bad siege tank placement... of course they win, I wouldn't expect Blizzard to make them any other way
ChiefFelix47 5 months ago
Why so mana dislikes? D:
MaccyTheFurry 5 months ago
matrix
nagolyaj 5 months ago
"Your conmputer is slowing down the game."...
schwako1 5 months ago
Oh the carnage...
Zadeify 5 months ago
Bad siege tank placement and VERY bad bain micro
artario146 5 months ago
@artario146 it's seige tank vs banelings? how are you supposed to micro siege mod tanks and banelings any way?
itsWAZZA1 5 months ago
This proves Protoss are OP
ericyan123 5 months ago
needs more banelings
acesmak 5 months ago
the one reason I don't play SCII, the camera is too fucking close.
Ubermonkeh 5 months ago
banelings banelings banelings ooh like banelings banelings banelings ooh like a deadly green landmine mine
atakanbotasun 5 months ago
It would be a lot more realistic (but practically useless) if blowing up a single baneling in a tight group would cause a domino effect that effectively kills the entire group... That'd be pretty interesting to see. :P
yudanielk 5 months ago
30 Ghost vs 30 High Templar vs 30 Infestator
youtube.com/watch?v=1hj1gO7OpkQ&hd=1
SummerEtSergail 5 months ago
Ok so we get twenty seconds of actual Baneling Vs Siege tank action, then three minutes of banelings rolling around doing nothing?
WTF?
blizrfiz 5 months ago
Captain Kirahae: WE WILL HOLD THE LINE
UEGXKotor 5 months ago
bannelings,bannelings,bannelings ohhh...
IArkeyI 5 months ago
for some reason i keep having this image of fly maggots moving under my skin
v2099 5 months ago
someone is BK with banglings...
DaHalo2AzN 5 months ago
video ends at 0:26
gh8231 5 months ago 222
@gh8231 thanks
TheAlen081 5 months ago
@gh8231 no it doesn't..
cascer1 5 months ago
OH DAMN
MrTarogon 5 months ago