Just one nice piece of information a guy from CERN told us during his lecture: the combined energy of all particles circling in the LHC accelerator is equal to a speeding truck. If they need to switch it off, the particles must be directed into a huge graphite block cooled by a mountain.
Just imagine how when we used to sit in front of old televisions, those particles were blasting us right in the face. I probably still have damage from watching Star Trek.
@06410134 "interesante pero no creo que funcione" "interesting but I don't believe it works", Dude I'm not sure even if what you're typing here is spanish or portuguese - but around here people speak english.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I have a neutron here any idea how i turn it into a turnip. I am having trouble accelerating the protons at the correct angle. Is it true if i manipulate a carrot this could solve my problem ? thanks mate. please help.
The mechanism behind the visible image is the charge deposited in the CCD when a proton strikes a silicon nucleus. This impact produces a local burst of charged secondaries, which deposit sufficient charge to cause a transient signal. The occasional sounds that you can hear are the result of a proton striking the junction of a transistor in the audio circuit. This same phenomenon can flip bits in a memory chip as well. For more info try a search web for single event effect
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Time to email my representative to look into NASA contract # NNG05EB92C's use of taxpayer money. Looks like a waste of time and nothing important was learned
So, you have the webcam as the anode? Where's the grid? If you have no grid, what causes the ion's to jump such a large potential (distance). I'm not sure about this one. But I think more work needs to be done to verify your theory.
Thanks for your comment. T The particle beam is generated by a particle accelerator that is approximately 30 meters in diameter and is not shown in the picture. The proton beam is directed down a beam path that comes into the experiment room through the wall we are looking at. When it enters the room it is already at its final energy (230 million electron volts). So the camera is not part of the accelerating process. It just detects the particles.
Actually, the energy was something less than 230 MeV at the webcam(I had an energy degrader in there to scatter the beam for uniformity). I don't remember exactly (as it was incidental to the demonstration), but it was likely ~ 150 MeV. The current was very, very low (I had to throttle the accelerator back by ~ 7 orders of magnitude to avoid frying the camera instantly), probably ~ 1-2 femptoAmps
what about electron beams? they surely must do the same effect? old cathode ray tubes use to make xray secondaries outside the tube, so it must be able to be thrown out onto a photoreceptor like that right?? awesome work!
I want to see some footage of a webcam placed into an indestructible box, which is then let go into a black hole. Then send an army of space chimps to retrieve it. Who ever makes it back with the camera gets a banana.
I've had 2 cameras in a radiation treatment lab do the same thing but much much worse after a year of being installed, when the lights were dimmed in the lab you could see the damage as colored speckles throughout 60% of the image.
What the hell happened at 2:22? Why is Youtube showing the "buffering" symbol even when the video is all the way loaded? Why did it go dark when the proton beam was shut off? ??
You are correct of course and if I had thought of it before hand I would have done that. :) If you take a completely dark image another camera you do not see an unchanging field of bright spots. Also, we have identified the time that where at least one of the pixels is damaged. This is pointed out in the video.
The particle beam shooter is a multimillion dollar radiation facility at Massachusetts General Hospital, so I did not make it :). It is pretty much your run of the mill particle accelerator that is about 30 meters in diameter.
Awesome illustration of particle hits on camera detectors -- great for education about the kinds of artifacts you see on space cameras! Check out any image from the Cassini Saturn spacecraft taken through an ultraviolet filter and you'll see a lot of the same artifacts.
Thanks for the comment. I haven't thought much about neutron beams but I think neutrons would have a similar effect. Any significant energy transfer would cause the camera to respond. The big difference would be the neutron cross section is so much lower that not as many particles would be registered for the same number of incoming particles.
What kind of particle (protons?)and at what energy are used? Would these particles create trails in a cloud chambre?
freemanx2x 2 months ago
Crank up the power a million fold and call it a PHASER!!!!
mrthebillman 3 months ago
Just one nice piece of information a guy from CERN told us during his lecture: the combined energy of all particles circling in the LHC accelerator is equal to a speeding truck. If they need to switch it off, the particles must be directed into a huge graphite block cooled by a mountain.
jednoucelovy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Real BBw wives online now naneedj.info
cheristessa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DrNickAG my m.s.n is my profile baybe!
sexykatie90 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep me warm baby ** rockmycity.info **
valeriemeganllya 1 year ago
say how much power did it take to shoot the camera? and how much would it take to punch through a rock(imagine particle beams that replace drills)???
routhoula 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep me warm baby rockmycity.info
kelleregnersdr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try online Russian women profiles gettop5.info
yevette3fd 1 year ago
will a waterproof/dustproof housing protect the camera from this
SandstonRedneck2 1 year ago
Just imagine how when we used to sit in front of old televisions, those particles were blasting us right in the face. I probably still have damage from watching Star Trek.
BlueStateChronicle 2 years ago
yeah but thats not the T.V.s fault... its Kirks
dahmer09 1 year ago
interesante
pero no creo que funcione
06410134 2 years ago
@06410134 "interesante pero no creo que funcione" "interesting but I don't believe it works", Dude I'm not sure even if what you're typing here is spanish or portuguese - but around here people speak english.
breedfreely 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. yjiuoio
SterlingSadler 2 years ago
gamma ray yields gabba hey ;) the ramones
YouXKneekXIT 2 years ago
hi "snort" "snort" dats cool
superfresshh 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have a neutron here any idea how i turn it into a turnip. I am having trouble accelerating the protons at the correct angle. Is it true if i manipulate a carrot this could solve my problem ? thanks mate. please help.
MrAnytimeAnyplace 2 years ago
cool video beams and particles are awsome!!!!
BushidoXReaper 2 years ago
Now I know how to do old movie noise effect into my videos: Just shot some protons using a particle accelerator at the film!
Thank you very much, YouTube :D
--
Nive video, btw :)
msndokaralho 3 years ago 3
Suggest you use a Grundig camera (FA76). I had the same problem with neutrons/
waxcrayonsftw 2 years ago
very nice would that be easy to duplicate with the sun or some other source of particles
crazyscientist 3 years ago
apparantly, alpha particles work just as well for total destruction of a CCD - see my video response. ^_^
bionerd23 3 years ago 3
Hi,
i don't get, why the particles/protons are visible at the impact. What is the physically effect behind that? Where can i finde any information?
Is it the ionisation of the lens matter and photon emission by recombination?
Thx in advance
quantumizer 3 years ago
Hi Quantumizer,
The mechanism behind the visible image is the charge deposited in the CCD when a proton strikes a silicon nucleus. This impact produces a local burst of charged secondaries, which deposit sufficient charge to cause a transient signal. The occasional sounds that you can hear are the result of a proton striking the junction of a transistor in the audio circuit. This same phenomenon can flip bits in a memory chip as well. For more info try a search web for single event effect
Ethan
ProtonEthan 3 years ago
"My God, It's full of stars!"
zapjaste 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Time to email my representative to look into NASA contract # NNG05EB92C's use of taxpayer money. Looks like a waste of time and nothing important was learned
clw132 3 years ago
Particle Man hates Webcam Man. They have a fight, Particle wins.
SiannBeck 3 years ago 7
not even that bad
low long does a human eye survive a particle beam?
d4m4s74 3 years ago
How anti-climatic.
I was on the edge of my seat hoping that the camera would spontaneously erupt into flames at some point in the vid.
Still, +1 for science.
yetson 3 years ago
Anti-climactic*
I kinda felt the same way but its not the videos fault :P
T1ocfa1dhArLa 3 years ago
So, you have the webcam as the anode? Where's the grid? If you have no grid, what causes the ion's to jump such a large potential (distance). I'm not sure about this one. But I think more work needs to be done to verify your theory.
warforlips 3 years ago
Dear Warforlips,
Thanks for your comment. T The particle beam is generated by a particle accelerator that is approximately 30 meters in diameter and is not shown in the picture. The proton beam is directed down a beam path that comes into the experiment room through the wall we are looking at. When it enters the room it is already at its final energy (230 million electron volts). So the camera is not part of the accelerating process. It just detects the particles.
DrNickAG 3 years ago
230MeV
what current?
rodbotic 3 years ago
Actually, the energy was something less than 230 MeV at the webcam(I had an energy degrader in there to scatter the beam for uniformity). I don't remember exactly (as it was incidental to the demonstration), but it was likely ~ 150 MeV. The current was very, very low (I had to throttle the accelerator back by ~ 7 orders of magnitude to avoid frying the camera instantly), probably ~ 1-2 femptoAmps
ProtonEthan 3 years ago
what about electron beams? they surely must do the same effect? old cathode ray tubes use to make xray secondaries outside the tube, so it must be able to be thrown out onto a photoreceptor like that right?? awesome work!
boxa888 2 years ago
Cool. Im beaming now
MuslimGhost 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
For the non-scientist this is B000RING....
jschlosser 3 years ago
Maybe you need to spend some time becoming more scientifically literate. This is actually pretty neat.
roadnate 3 years ago 2
aperture science perhaps :3
lovelessinjustice 3 years ago 8
1:00
JesuusOfSuburbia 3 years ago
IMMA CHARGIN MAH LAZER!!!!! O.O
DannyMinick 3 years ago 5
this is complicated.
CoLdBLaDe 3 years ago
My Nikon d80 gets those spots, damn him and his machine f'ing up my camera!
DroogInPhoenix 3 years ago 4
I want to see some footage of a webcam placed into an indestructible box, which is then let go into a black hole. Then send an army of space chimps to retrieve it. Who ever makes it back with the camera gets a banana.
Linxoz 3 years ago
I gotta say, that is fucking amazing.
kdwormy 3 years ago
Ya, it was completely amazing in kind of a subtle way.
It's interesting how the image looked like a starry night sky, an effect which is very similar in nature.
carcosa 3 years ago 3
Pretty cool stuff. Not every day do you get to see the makings of the universe bombarding a webcam.
AcryllicWonder 3 years ago
can you accelerate those particles a little more then smash them into some uranium or something, that was kind of boring
phr0sty 3 years ago
I've had 2 cameras in a radiation treatment lab do the same thing but much much worse after a year of being installed, when the lights were dimmed in the lab you could see the damage as colored speckles throughout 60% of the image.
72devilz 3 years ago
Next up, Ethan will SHINE A FLASHLIGHT DIRECTLY INTO A WEBCAM!!1
STAY TUNED!
telladictorian 3 years ago
FOLLOWED BY A FRICKIN' LASER BEAM!
denelson83 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You just wasted 2 minutes and 55 seconds of my life. I want them back.
SoCalSpooky 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
BORRRINNGGG..... shhh were trying to listen...
StickyAnus 3 years ago
What the hell happened at 2:22? Why is Youtube showing the "buffering" symbol even when the video is all the way loaded? Why did it go dark when the proton beam was shut off? ??
flybynightvideo 3 years ago 3
And knowing is half the battle!
algaretozky 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I once set a particle beam up that was pointed directly at my grandmothers butt hole. She liked that.
LayneRoxxx 3 years ago
A similar effect can be seen by neutron bombardment as well as gamma radiation.
takonis 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fake
bozsquad 3 years ago
Is this the CrATER instrument of the Lunar Recon?
Zvezdichko1 3 years ago
Dear Zvez,
Yes, CRaTER is an instrument on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. It will measure the effects of radiation on living tissue.
DrNickAG 3 years ago
I wish I was smarter
jvangurp 3 years ago 2
You mean you wish you were
briantw1 3 years ago
I wished I were, or I wish I am, no I wish I was.
jvangurp 3 years ago
Why didn't we see the dark image before this? Chances are the camera had these hot pixels before this test.
/b
briankwest 3 years ago
Dear Briankwest,
Thanks for your comment.
You are correct of course and if I had thought of it before hand I would have done that. :) If you take a completely dark image another camera you do not see an unchanging field of bright spots. Also, we have identified the time that where at least one of the pixels is damaged. This is pointed out in the video.
DrNickAG 3 years ago
particles man.
fr3d420 3 years ago
So now we know.
JayKeaton 3 years ago
Nice vid
I'm a bit curious, how do you go about making a particle beam shooter?
razzfer 3 years ago
Dear razzfer,
Thanks for your comment!
The particle beam shooter is a multimillion dollar radiation facility at Massachusetts General Hospital, so I did not make it :). It is pretty much your run of the mill particle accelerator that is about 30 meters in diameter.
DrNickAG 3 years ago
its gona end teh worldz as we knowz it!
jk, Happy New year!!!!
calvin950 3 years ago
I wanted to see the camera get destroyed by the particles. Lets kick this baby into overdrive and do it again.
akolozvary 3 years ago 3
he sounds like kermit
lalalalarofl 3 years ago
Very cool! Does the camera lens attenuate the particle impacts at all?
jcims 3 years ago
Awesome illustration of particle hits on camera detectors -- great for education about the kinds of artifacts you see on space cameras! Check out any image from the Cassini Saturn spacecraft taken through an ultraviolet filter and you'll see a lot of the same artifacts.
elakdawalla 3 years ago
Elakdawalla,
Thanks for the comments! Yes, many spacecraft show similar effects.
DrNickAG 3 years ago
what the...??? omg this is radiation o_O
sciencoking 3 years ago
wow, that was awesome! 5 stars from me!
say, what would happen if you'd shoot neutrons (thermal N, fast N, etc.) at the camera? thanks a lot!
bionerd23 3 years ago
Hi Bionerd!
Thanks for the comment. I haven't thought much about neutron beams but I think neutrons would have a similar effect. Any significant energy transfer would cause the camera to respond. The big difference would be the neutron cross section is so much lower that not as many particles would be registered for the same number of incoming particles.
DrNickAG 3 years ago
Awesome!!!
RoninX7 4 years ago
This is just way too cool!
miasingers 4 years ago
Good Job Nick!
Comptonscattering 4 years ago 2