Fox Crops
3:07
Added: 2 years ago
From: mediamatters4america
Views: 215,053
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (849)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This should be illegal. Period. . . . .

  • Wow!

  • New WOrld Order will end soon when Jesus Rules as King

  • Fox News Caught In Shocking Dirty Tricks Stunt Against Ron Paul

  • Why would Media Matters defend Mr. NAFTA

    DEFEND REAL PROGRESSIVES

  • thanks media matters.. this shit is criminal

  • wow that last one was truly misleading

  • LMAO! MediaMatters? A George Soros funded media outlet is going to try and tell Fox how to do its job? It sounds to me like they are bitter at Fox's success, seeing that they can't compete. What a joke!

  • @TheIcetek ..LMAO! really..really...Your "What a joke" comment is pretty redundant after the entire statement you wrote..lmao Because the video CLEARLY shows Fox news what it's Known for... Bias editing, fake news casting and a hand of the Gop masquerading as a news channel. But I wouldn't expect nothing less from a typical, ignorant American to be blinded by their own insecureness and hate...GROW UP

  • @jj62ud You know, for "masquerading as a news channel", they sure seem to be kicking the crap outof CNN, MSNBC, and the others. And no, I am not insecure or hateful. I just don't trust George Soros or Media Matters.

  • @TheIcetek Come on..really... really... as if a ridiculous popularity contest and ratings in the media dictates fox news as being legit, being correct??? Come on.. If I remember correctly, Hitler had a lot, a lot of followers, was he right? Millions of Americans from the south believed slavery was morally right and justified..were they right? Right now there's a man in Florida who believes he's the second coming of Jesus Christ whom has over one hundred thousand followers..Is he right???

  • I can go on and on and on about an extreme amount of cases throughout our history that prove, Just because you have a few believers, does not make you right. When you call yourself a "news" organization you have the responsibility to uphold the countless, the numerous of journalist and news anchors that have paved the way and came before you. Not to put your own political beliefs, edited lies and constantly adding wood to a t- light flame to make it bigger, watch it spread for political gain

  • , to put them before facts. When all you have to do is go to youtube, put in Fox news and every single proof video of fox news being unfair, unbalanced and bias is a shame in my book. And I wanted to apologize to you cause I read your statement and it wasn't really hate, I think I was just overcome with less subdued emotion.. and plus I don't know you, I don't know your character, so I apologize, Forgive my passion, I'm studying to become a journalist.

  • @jj62ud A ridiculous popularity contest? Oh, you mean who actually watches these programs. So, are you trying to imply that Fox is like Hitler, slavery, or being the second coming of Jesus? (probably not, but it's still funny) Your absolute hatred of Conservatives and Fox News is rather obvious, but is it right? just saying

  • Comment removed

  • @jj62ud So you think Fox is the only station that edits interviews/statements for airing? EVERY station does that. You are trying to imply Fox is distorting what someone says, when it is pretty clear even in this clip that the content left out made no difference at all as for what Al Gore said. You should try examining Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, etc. They do this on a regular basis to try and further their liberal agenda, and to make Republicans look bad

  • Comment removed

  • @TheIcetek LMAO! dude! lmao.this is going to be my last reply because obviously I'm not speaking to someone that is on the same intellect level as me. Clearly you have a many steps to climb to get to where I'm at.. Read again what you wrote. Then read again what I wrote. "because Fox has a lot of viewers (are you still with me?) doesn't make them ..always right. if that were the case, Hitler and slavery would be. SAME GOES FOR LIBERAL MEDIA!, Republicans look bad? as if they need any help

  • @jj62ud Excellent..good job! Yeah, you really need to stop replying.. He's going to keep going on and on. Conservatives hate it when someone smarter than they are comes along and makes them look stupid.

  • @StormWriter27 If you are really a debate teacher, I feel bad for your students. They obviously won't be taught what a real debate is all about. Just being politically correct and a liberal doesn't give you a win. IDIOT!

  • @StormWriter27 I'm still waiting for someone smarter to come along. Neither you or jj62ud even come close to qualifying.....still waiting....still waiting....that's ok. nice try

  • @jj62ud You're right as far as intellect level. I am light years beyond what you could hope to achieve. There's a good reason Fox is kicking the crap out of the other networks. Because people like what they see on Fox much more than the other networks. And yes, they do lean more conservative than the others. If you were paying attention to what most Americans identify themselves as, you would realize that the majority of Americans are conservative, not liberal. You're making this too easy!

  • @TheIcetek Well, I can't speak for the populations political views, but I can speak for party membership, which, I believe, would show true political dedication, rather than simple "i believe" dedication.

    The Democratic party has an estimated 72 million members, while the GOP has an estimated 55 million. The other 44 million are independent. This statistic implies a liberal lean, though, as I said before, this only implies party membership, not political ideology, though it does play a roll.

  • @kingbadmovie The problem with your numbers could be that if you go by numbers provided by Acorn, Democrats include felons, the dead, and made up names. Seriously though, a lot of Independents are more conservative than liberal. Many of them are former Republicans who gave up on the party, but still consider themselves conservative. And don't forget about libertarians, who are almost 100% conservative. If nothing else I've said here convinces you, look at the last election,liberals were rejected

  • @TheIcetek Yes, and conservatives were rejected in 2008 and 2006. Your point being what, exactly? Public opinion fluctuates depending on the political atmosphere, what people hear from friends, what they see on the news and other factors. It doesn't imply a majority of people are conservative, just that a majority of people were dissatisfied with how the democrats have been running things, nothing more. The same happens with the republicans a few years before. That's a republic for ya!

  • @kingbadmovie my main point is that liberalism might have some good ideas, but when put into practice, they most often have a negative effect. world peace, health care for all, better education (college and more funding for K-12), etc. these things might sound good, but when we try to make them materialize, we discover that they often go against a free society by infringing on others rights, are too costly to implement, and too hard to prevent fraud from distorting their intention

  • @TheIcetek I understand where you're coming from. Yet I don't see how universal health care, increased funding for education, and investing in alternative energy, and legalization of recreational drugs, are infringing on others' rights. How would these jeopardize the rights of Americans?

    Besides, liberals are at least attempting to fix the problems of the country, misguided as they may be at times. I can't say the same about the conservatives, who seem to do little apart from cutting taxes.

  • @kingbadmovie Universal health care is unconstitutional. The government cannot force the people to purchase a product against their will. Increased funding for education is not the problem. Teaching is the problem. Alternative energy is not effective if it can't support itself in the free market without government subsidy. Legalization of rec drugs infringes on others rights when someone smokes pot, goes out driving, and kills someone. Tax cuts=more money that you EARNED in your pocket to spend

  • @TheIcetek I'll answer each of these individually. Universal health care: The constitution grants congress the power to tax and spend money for the general welfare. This tax makes health care more widely available and affordable, and thus promotes the general welfare of the population. It is similar to social security in that regard, that you pay into a "pool" and when the time comes that you need health care or need to retire, the money is available to help pay the costs. It's called sharing.

  • @TheIcetek Alternative energy: Coal industries receive incentives as well. Coal industries received subsidies amounting to $17 billion between 2002 and 2008. Not to mention tax breaks, tax credits and development breaks amounting to billions of dollars.. If other energies rely on government incentive in order to operate, I don't think it's unreasonable for other energies, which are cleaner for the environment, to also receive government funding as well.

  • @kingbadmovie Coal may receive subsidies, but you are forgetting that coal makes a profit, with or without those subsidies. When these other "cleaner environmental" energies can stand on their own without massive subsidies to keep them going, then we can consider those alternatives. Until then, we need to stick to what we know works in the free market.

  • @TheIcetek Legalization of drugs: I believe alcohol is legal, is it not? Drunk driving is also an issue in our society, yet I'm not currently aware of any massive movement to make alcohol illegal. We have police officers who patrol the streets for drunk drivers and administer tests to those they believe to be under the influence. Wouldn't the same apply to other harmful substances such as marijuana or lsd? Besides, 85,000 people die a year from alcohol consumption, 0 from marijuana.

  • @kingbadmovie As for alcohol being legal, look at Amendments 18 and 21. It was prohibited, and then repealed.I am well aware of drunk driving and its ramifications. There is a thing called personal responsibility and moderation. As for 0 deaths from marijuana, I think the numbers are a bit higher than that (I don't claim to have exact numbers). It is still illegal to possess or smoke marijuana/lsd, as well as driving under the influence of controlled substances.

  • @TheIcetek Well obviously individuals smoke pot and end up killing themselves by crashing their car or similar incidents, that's a factor with every substance. I was talking about ODing. Scientists found that the ratio to getting stoned on weed to ODing on weed is 1 to 40,000. That being said, it means that you'd have to smoke weed 40,000 times the average amount you need to get high. Compare that to alcohol which rests between 1 to 4 and 1 to 10, making it much more potentially lethal.

  • @kingbadmovie As far as marijuana goes, I actually don't have a problem with the government legalizing it. I just think we need to return to a time when we actually hold people accountable for their actions. Enough of saying "he had a rough upbringing, no love etc." Noone forced a particular criminal to commit crimes like that. If you drink and drive or are under the influence, you should pay the price of your choice to do so.

  • @TheIcetek I was about to say, you don't seem to be one of those authoritarian republicans, why would you have a problem with it? Agreed, if you break the law you should be held accountable.

  • @kingbadmovie so we are in agreement on legalizing the use, but not any harm resulting from the use of recreational drugs.

  • @TheIcetek Indeed. And what happened during prohibition? Crime rates went up. Prior to 1914, the homicide rate in large cities was 5.6 per 100,000 people. That jumped to 10 per 100,000 people in 1920. That's a 78% increase. Numerous other violent crimes rose as well. Prohibition is beautiful because it shows the correlation between the making a substance illegal and crime. I agree, personal responsibility and moderation are a necessary, but why wouldn't this apply to drugs as well as alcohol?

  • @TheIcetek Tax cuts: Tax cuts are nice, sure. I'd love to get a tax cut. Who wouldn't? But the government has expenditures. There are people in this country who don't have it as well as you or I, and they need help. There are institutions that I'm sure you and I both enjoy, and those things cost money. Besides, liberals tend to promote taxing the exceedingly wealthy, not the middle class and not the lower class. They use up more of the infrastructure, so they need to pay more back into it.

  • @kingbadmovie The problem with government expenditures is they keep going up, while the private sector keeps shrinking. Government spends too much. As for liberals not wanting to tax lower and middle class, they are perfectly willing to let the current tax rates expire on all Americans, just to try and prove a point about taxing the "wealthy". Anyone making over $200,000, which includes small businesses that file on their personal income tax. Top 5% pay over 65% of the income tax.

  • @kingbadmovie Liberals are not trying to fix problems. They are trying to secure a power base by making people dependent on the government. If you are beholden to government, it is like being addicted to a drug in a way. You can't get by without it. I would suggest you try reading the Constitution and "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine. Conservatives are promoting freedom from government intrusion, lower taxes, personal responsibility, and a return to our core values represented by the Constitution

  • @TheIcetek Oh come come, you can't honestly believe that liberals are nothing but power-hungry politicians wanting to consolidate power. Mind you politicians are politicians, but I think it's an insult to your intelligence to say that you believe that they are just "out to enslave us". That's folly.

    And I have read the constitution, though I haven't read common sense.

    Freedom from government intrusion? Like defining marriage to keep gays from marrying? Telling a woman what to do with her body?

  • @kingbadmovie Well, first off, I didn't say "out to enslave us". I said making people dependent om government. There is a difference. If you looked closely at what liberals say vs. what they actually do, you would see that I am right. Let's take Obama for example. He said earlier this week that we weren't in danger of a double dip recession because the stimulus stopped that. Just yesterday he is now saying if we don't pass tax cut compromise, we are in danger of a double-dip recession.

  • @TheIcetek Well, first of all that wasn't Obama, that was Larry Summers that said we are in danger of a double-dip recession. And isn't he saying that we SHOULD pass tax cuts on everyone, rather than the middle class only? Politicians always say one thing and then have it turned around within a few days. If I had a nickle every time a politician changed his view or stance on something, I'd most likely be demanding a tax cut for the wealthy too, if you catch my drift. It doesn't prove anything.

  • @TheIcetek And I would be inclined to believe that even though most Americans would identify themselves as conservative, they don't fully understand what that means. They hear the world conservative and liberal, and conservative sounds more official. Plus, the right has pretty much trashed the word liberal. Frankly, I would think if you discussed the issues in a non-biased, upfront way with most Americans, they would take liberal stances on issues, yet still insist that they were conservative.

  • Obama lies...........

  • @Auggie56 Prove it!

  • @jj62ud How about Obama saying the health care debates would be broadcast on CSPAN? He said it multiple times. Show me where they were broadcast, or where Republicans were part of the crafting of this bill.

  • @TheIcetek So do you know if Obama told CSPAN personally, not to air the health care reforms debates lol?? or do you know if CSPAN chose not to air the health care reform debates?? lol

  • @jj62ud Does it really matter whose decision it was not to air it? If you go out and tell the public you are going t have the most transparent administration, as well as telling the American people that the health care debate will be made public by putting it on CSPAN, and then turning around and ignoring everythig you previously said about transparency and open debates makes Obama into the biggest hypocrite ever. And just saying you don't like Republicans ideas doesn't mean you go it alone

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @jj62ud I just made this account today just so I can post a comment. I am a debate teacher for my local High school and you really impressed me. Even though Obama did say that c-span was going to air the debates but didn't, only the voting. If you look at all the media that surrounded this issue, the majority of people calling this a lie are republicans. There have been countless public viewing debates and polls over healthcare reform.

  • This type of bias journalism is what is fueling unjustified anger within the GOP.

  • He did not personally request earmarks because he is no longer a senator, but there were more earmarks passed in his first year of office than in any other first year first term

  • Well, yeah, they cut out the bloviating...

    All TV news does this. Each of the points get across...

  • Short answer does indeed = "yes."

    Damn shame that Faux pinheads can only communicate in short answers.

    Why not air the man's COMPLETE answer?

    Dressing up a talk show to look like a newsroom does not make the actors journalists!!!

  • Something Gore will directly benefit from?

    Short answer = yes.

    Soooo hard for a guy like Gore to just tell the truth.

  • @forwardmover Yes of course....that`s the irony......Obama, Gore whoever, can be chopped /cannot be chopped...does NOT mean they tell the truth...they can promise, plead, whatever.....Obama has already gone back on many of his promises. Gore is a pathological liar, and 30,000 scientists are witnesses to that....Global Warming ? The oceans temperature is a major factor and guess what? There is no significant rise in the oceans temps....Mr Gores Green Tax anyone????

  • This brainwashing can and does happen. Fortunately, it can and will soon be reversed.

    Right. Left! Right!

    Just watch.

  • @forwardmover Couldn`t agree more...it`s all being played out and watched by the world....as the LIES fall apart one by one, like a line of dominoes falling down, it`s inefitable.... LOL @ Gore -"if you think I`m greedy, you dont know me!!!! " Mr Gore you are a very rich man already.....you just wanna be richer and more powerful, oh we know ya alright....we know ALL about you and all those low-life liars like Bush and Blair and Cheney and Kissinger and thousands more....

  • I think the majority sees this brainwashing going on. I think they do it on purpose like Jerry Springer. There is no savior for the Republican Party on the Horizon. As long as they stay divided, so will the voice of the nation when it comes to them. That's the bright side for the real Liberal media.

  • To interject an opinion/observation, I wonder what the true difference is in the parties when their core beliefs reflect the same things.

    I could go into full details but that would require multiple comment boxes but I will only cite 1 for brevity:

    Allowing the Federal Reserve to continue.

    Sorry, but all of this lib vs cons is just a distraction from real, pertinent issues.

  • @Pipesofpan Those ppl, who watch Fox News are BITTER, Mccain voters who lost the election, and hardly cant accept the truth, So the propoganda begun from January 20th. 2009 Destroy Destroy Destroy Anything everything from the Government Destroy the appointees, Destroy the elected officials, Destroy The president Its a 24/7 Machine that wanna take people out one by one.
  • Glenn Beck knows how to brainwash people. He pairs up perfectly with Fox News.

  • Fox news = bullshit for masses and brainwash ordinary stupid people who only rely on fox news

  • Fox has higher rating than any other news network for a reason

  • Fox has higher ratiings b/c they sensationalize the news more and they pander to the conservativie right base.

    It is a smart (although unmoral) way to make profit. Pander to the right, filter the news to make them believe more in the conservative movement, and attract more loyal viewers who you have thus brainwashed.

    Trust me, FNC is not higher in the ratings b/c of their journalistic excellence. Worst, b/c of it, now CNN now has to sensationalize too just to try to keep up. FNC killed news

  • I am surely not making an arguement over the journalistic integrity of Fox News. Fox has the highest ratings because it is the only network that "panders" to the right instead of to the left; and this nations majority are CONSERVATIVES. All I am saying is that I am glad Fox is out there because it balances things out.

  • @TSpurs06 It doesn't hurt to have pretty blonde girls with short skirts either. Also make sure these women don't appear too smart because that's intimidating to the male viewers. That's why Gretchen Carlson has to pretend to be a dumb blonde even though she has a pretty impressive academic background.

  • @TSpurs06 Really ? Your view or that of left leaning jealous media ?

  • @TSpurs06 Simple economics, really. Fox news is required by law to deliver a prophet to shareholders. They can be as biased and misleading as they want, there's no law against that. All they need to do is keep an eye out for libel and slander to prevent the possible lawsuit of such, other than that, they can create the programming they want as long as it makes profit. That's how the law works. Be dishonest and unethical, but just pay the shareholders.

  • Their are more dumbasses in America than people with some intelligence.

  • yes, and the reason is that 50,000,000 racist white people support their own like rush, and hannity, and fixed noise, and neal boortz,etc.etc.etc.

  • Where did you get that number from? All white people are racist? Even further people who listen to extreme right wingers like Hannity and Limbaugh are racist? This is why we have such a problem in this country. Racism exists not just on 1 side of the aisle.

  • that number is just a rough estimate. im not too far off. you have to remember that the civil rights movement happened just 41 years ago and the majority of americans from that period are either still alive or have passed their racist beliefs down to their children. at least 25 percent of americans are racist and that is indisputable.

  • It is an undeniable fact? Your not too far off? You have no facts to support your shitty opinions. Us white Americans are so racist and have such hate and discontent for anyone who isn't white that we decided to vote in the first black President. How did Obama get into the White House? A conglomerate of all minorities? Think about that. If you want to look at a true racist, look no further than Van Jones.

  • first of all if black people are racist, it is because white people made us that way; second of all prez obama got 66,000,000 votes and john mccain got 58,000,000 votes. now anyone who would vote for mccain/palin over obama/biden must be racist. the right wing had the nerve to say that sarah palin had more executive experience than obama. uh...where did she go to school again ? and obama went where? I thought so! only racism can explain that kind of logic my friend!!!!

  • The arguement of Sarah Palin having more experience than Barack Obama stemmed from the FACT that she was a Governor and Mayor (government experience) longer than Obama. Is that racist? I think that you are deeply troubled and angry at someone and have a very distorted view of race and ethnicity. This arguement that you are posing here is very sad.

  • @inosnt1 civil rights movement did happen that long ago, but guess who was against it? Democrats! Look it up. They were the ones who were blocking the legislation (not 100% of them, but most). Get your history right! Republicans were the party to champion civil rights, starting with Abraham Lincoln. A Republican!

  • I feel like there media matters needs a tv show. a venue to go line by line word by word and broadcast this information.

  • All you choads blasting your mouths about liberal and conservative shit are wierd and paranoid. You people get all wrapped up in the nonsense and by the end of the day nothing has happened other than your emotions becoming increasingly raw. I guess it gives people some kind of comfort to be angry all the time when your life sucks otherwise.

  • I am astounded by the lack of information most people have, the deafness of ears, the blindness of sight.

  • Fox news needs to be shown for what it is..a mouthpiece for ultra conservatives. I do hope genuine conservatives care about honesty.

  • and CNN and MSNBC are not "mouthpieces" for liberals? the hypocrisy of you people astounds me

  • Fox is blatant. I mean blatant. Also, scarborough is on MSNBC.

  • there is a difference between a network that is fair to a party as msnbc typically is to liberals (and bashes conservatives with facts and well-done research) compared to a network that constantly smears a party with lies, fear tactics and propaganda to liberals while kissing the ass of conservatives as fox news does. msnbc is nothing like fox news in that respect. fox news is just a bitter network that spews hate all day everyday and making up lies to push its far right agenda.

  • Tell it BetaBro! I want to see some videos of CNN & MSNBC and all the other liberal channels cropping stories! There are just as many. Probably lots more due to the fact that FOX is basically the only big conservative channel!

  • Just an FYI . The stimulis package that Obama signed was flooded with earmarks like a train to go from LA to Harry Reids district of Vegas

  • Just to point out that your a retard, Harry Reid doesn't have a "district". He has a "state" of which he is a senator from, and he represents the entire "state", no just the city of "Las Vegas"

  • another lie thanks to fox news.

  • Oh noes, the media manipulates things!

    /reality shattered

  • all right, I see what you are doing and I agree that this in not reporting the news. But so is MSNBC.

  • For example...?

  • Staggering.

  • Fact brother. We have an oligarchy, ruled by an elite group for sure. That is the main difference between left leaning and right leaning folks. No one dare criticize Bush, but liberals WILL do so to their candidate. Obama won't prosecute Bush/Cheney, won't repeal don't ask don't tell, continues the bailout of the rich bastards that caused this chaos, won't bring the troops out of lands they don't belong in......it goes on and on. I believe he had good intentions, but he got set straight quickly.

  • We can only hope you are wrong.

  • Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com IDROJ

  • obama lied about sending a few millions on ear marks, but bush lied for 8 solid years, its only a matter of timer before mr bush is rotting in a cell in maximum security prison, the same system he created = 20,000 prisions throughout the state of, yep you guessed it Texas.

  • This is a flat out lie. Bush did not "create" 20,000 prisons. Here are the number of prisons in Texas.

    Federal=15

    State=117

    County=127

    Total=259

    This is including mental institutions and juvinile facilities. Spread your idiocy somewhere where no one can read it.

  • your point makes mine alot ore clearer, maybe not 20,000 prisions, thats as much an exaderation as weapons of mass destruction in iraq during bushes reign. anyhow 259 prisons in one state is a joke, the amount of people in jail or prison in this country is absurd, we lock up more of our own innocent offenders than other country in the world and at a cost to yep you the tax payer. the annual cost to incarcerate a single inmate in California is $48,843. $488,430 for a ten year sentence<college

  • How do I make your point? I am not going to comment on this tomfoolery anymore. Please check your facts and spelling next time you want to make a point.

  • Obama lied. Look at all the ear marks in the "stimulus"

  • Umm... the earmarks congress put in the stimulus are on average higher because of the 40 republicans than the dems... so pretty much they put them in and then didn't vote for it just so that you could make that very point.

  • If you're watching Fox to get your news you're already through the looking glass.

  • same with MSNBC

  • Fox News gives people both sides. they always say, we report and u decide. they always have people to debate both sides. maybe u should watch AFox for yourselves instead of getting biased bits on youtube. CNN is so biased in their reports that its sickening. I watch all of them and I decide for myself. that is what everyone should do---watch the tv news on ur own and U decide the truth. think 4 ur self. please.

  • Wow, talk about defending ignorance ..... with ignorance ... how blessedly american ............

  • how iam ignorant for thinking for myself?

    I've even been talking to a liberal dem-we have a nice dicussions. we respect each other. but u just listen to what u want to. I can see how smart it made u -not.

  • i agree, very well said....

  • screw TV news, podcasts have ACTUAL information

  • Wow! People are so closed-minded arent' they "iluvmymantodd"! You speak truth and from the heart and asshole "Jemuey" said you are ignorant. Typical D!

  • ya i agree

  • germanorion is a dumbass

  • Al Gore....is all about money, green, global warming...pleeeeeeeeeeeeease!!­! who is he kidding!!!

  • Paint huffer.

  • Fox also hates people who can speak in complete thoughts and not sound bites, hence the cropping of comments by the President.

  • Wow... and another... Obama's respect for the constitution? Give me a break! If he gave a rats ass about the Constitution he wouldnt be going for universal anything. He would be shutting down the IRS and sure as hell wouldnt be a democrat. Progressives and Democrats hate the constitution. It holds them back! The only people who approach the horrific shredding of the constitution the dems and progs do is the republicans... The entire system and 99% of those in it are corrupt.

  • lol... every penny... yeah... thats what his house shows...

  • Guess what, he does other things too, check what he says opposed to being so typical

  • He, being Gore? You're right, he does many things. Lie, Lie, Lie. GLobal warming is proven FALSE. If you were ACTUALLY checking YOUR views, you would know that. Gore is nothing more than a con man with a national stage.

  • Hey wait he created the internet. He has caused more global warming than most of us by flying all over the world giving speeches about how we should do the right thing. He owns more than one residence and drives around in a big bus preaching his bull crap. I think he should clean up his own yard before complaining about mine.

  • so where is the ice hiding?

  • There is more ice in the arctic this year than past years. Do you research and stop just being spoonfed by media matters and msnbc... The climate is changing - AS IT DOES. look at the natural history of this planet man! Ice ages and warming trends happen rather often (when gauged against the age of the planet). 'Cimate change' is being used as a political tool to push forward socialist agendas. The sheep in this country are being led to slaughter under a green banner.

  • Stupid Americans: 'Cimate change' is being used as a political tool to push forward socialist agendas.

    It's selfish people like you that cause the destruction of our world.

  • I do my own research, never spoon fed. the temperature does go up and down throughout centuries, but NEVER to the degree and acceleration that is occurring at this moment. But i am willing to look at information you might have. So sorry that I rather be green and use cloth bags rather that plastic ones because dolphin end up dying from ingesting hundreds of them, guess im a socialist.

  • Well thanks for the education, and thanks for continuing your pursuit to elevate propaganda. My initial comment must of struck a chord in you. I take it you are a Fox viewer and feel that I was misrepresenting a Fox viewer, well I wasn't. People who watch Fox are idiots, and people with no grasp of educating themselves with fact. That's why Fox has liars, Mannity, Orally, and Beck(Douche). Those good enough facts for you Mr. Network. Thanks for the compliment, I know I am intelligent.

    Regards,

  • i totally agree with you, exept on one thing: bill o'lyely not orally, lol.

    with all do respect to fox viewers, i think that they have just fallin prey to fox's brainwashing tactics. its so bad and expertly done by the evil fox machine that there is no way to deprogram these people. luckily they are a dying breed because the newer generation are more open minded and less hateful.

  • well not only is the network your defending a brainwashing propaganda machine, but they also deliberately hide the truth through all available means and that includes their abuse with cropping.

  • Thanks for the education, but didn't FOX just make a point of indicating that Obama wasn't promoting justice following the constitutional and legislative intent? a point that would clearly have been rubbished had the full clip played...

  • I was expecting some smoking gun in this video but I'm really disappointed. Showing snippets of the five words from a political speech that weren't BS is what they are supposed to be doing. I would expect any channel to do that to any party.

    No one wants to watch a politician sigh, stare at the ceiling, stutter, and then pontificate whether they're Republican or Democrat.

    Also, did you notice that when they made the video, they cut out things? The very same thing they are saying is sooo bad.

  • How adorable, a politician actually asking an advocate if he will personally benefit from the legislation.

  • Mediamatters, did I ever tell you were good?  You are realy good!

  • So Al Gore invests his profits in his own non-profit company.... how wonderful of him... does he draw a salary from his company?

  • How do they get away with this and how can it be called journalism? I really don't get it.

  • What he meant to say was. Yes. I will benefit greatly from the carbon offset trading scheme. I'm a greedy bastard.

  • haha if you think fox is the only one that does this then you are completely delusional. Almost all news networks are so bias they are not worth watching

  • Philien, not true. The truely bias networks are FOX and CNBC. the rest you can say lean one way or another but they dont lean so far that it totally distorts the news itself. An inteligent person can still form a logical opinion off of the information received from ABC, NBC, CNN. If you watch CNBC you will hate republicans and if you watch FOX you will hate dems..

  • There is no bias. Stop being so thick. They are owned by a few people at the very top. These few people have like ideals and most likely wine and dine together frequently. I heard a good quote the other day: For you to say the media is "biased" lends to the idea that you believe the reporters or front men are in control of the media. That's like saying the people on the factory floor making cars decide what cars to produce. It just doesn't happen. In any business. Open your mind a bit.

  • bweazel, so let me get this straight as i look past your insults for intelligent conversation. Your saying there is no bias, but all the media moguls have the same agenda? Even though several news organizations are obviously on separate agendas. Are you hinting at skull and bones crap or Illuminati theorys?

  • I said stop being thick. So really I only insulted you once. Take the plural off and stop being such a pussy. Regardless if their workers have a seperate agenda, I'd be willing to bet that their controllers share a common agenda. Elites are not like us. You think they really care about republicans and democrats when they're that high up? No. That's for us. To keep us fighting with each other and not them.

  • You don't think those at Fox news are elites? You don't think that Repubs in the House and Senate aren't elites. Their saleries alone put them far above any of us.

  • Their owners yes. Their employees no. They like to think they are but no. You seem to think a millionaire is an elite. No. They're not. I'm speaking of billionaires. The people that loan government money. THOSE elites. The ones that have enough money to influence the world. Our government is controlled by money. If someone is telling you what to do. You're not an elite. Period. End of story.

  • Well this went from discussing the biases of the individual networks to something about the rich dining together. Off topic so I'll you guys fight it out.

  • Not to mention more name calling from the self professed intelligent crowd. lol

  • the problem with that saying is that car company owners don't dine and conspire together.

    open your mind a bit, this is not some drama action show on TV, things are not as simple as you think they really are.

  • I'm sorry. Do you keep track of them? Do you know what they do? So instead of saying don't, let's stick to things like most likely. My mind is open. People like you make me sick. People who think their mind is open, who have the nerve to tell other people to open their mind, and then turn around with their egos and start speaking in definites like you really know. Shoo. Fuck off.

  • "People who think their mind is open, who have the nerve to tell other people to open their mind, and then turn around with their egos and start speaking in definites like you really know. Shoo. Fuck off."

    you really are one of the biggest fucking hypocrites i have ever discovered on youtube. you are one sad sack of shit.

    BTW how is the government being controlled by what they print? open your mind dipshit.

  • grudgekeeper lol nice he might be still in the mid ages thinking there is no bias smoking the peace pipe.

    bweazel as for you dumb ass there is bias news places you don't even see it cuz u my friend is dumb

  • Is I? ; )

  • IMMIGRATION REFORM NOW!!

  • Why can't we have a truly independant media news channel that aggressively reports on authentic progressive and 'left' issues, interests and POV? For one, it would show the absurd lie of the 'liberal media' tag given MSM by 'conservatives' and right-leaning pundits. 'Course, that's a major reason why we'll probably never have anything more progressive than Wing TV & Democracy Now! w/news from a truly alternative, progressive position. The Mockingbird press is infiltrated & controlled by the PTB.

  • There is a UCLA STudy on Media Bias if anyone is interested

  • FAUX News is disgusting.

  • "The fact is they do show the otherside of stories which don't get played in the media."

    So what? That's not the job of journalists. You think fair and balanced is just reporting two sides of an issue? How about a third side? Or a fourth? There's always, always more than one side on an issue and to suggest that a journalist should only acknowledge two of them? To be concise, a journalist's job is to report news, the way it happened.

  • FOX Noise is Rupert Murdochs private bitch army.

  • This is one station. I repeat one station. There are many other stations giving a slant to a liberal position and I guess it is OK. I think the left is just getting alittle scared that another side of the story is getting out. This is why they get so vitriolic to see fox news. If they weren't scared they would just ignore it instead of castigate it. Conservatives stand strong. If you are getting criticized know this. YOU MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT.

  • The Conservatives are exposing Liberal bias in the media. Liberals are exposing the Conservative bias in the media. This is exactly why I don't watch any TV news, and nobody should. (Unless you watch the same story on FOX and CNN, or MSNBC, etc.) No TV news is reliable. Personally, I read both Conservative and Liberal online news articles.

  • I read both also. I also try to make note of the political leanings of those giving out the reports or who is writing the articles.  Most importantly I try to remain true to certain principles that I think work best in our society from the founding.

  • same here. It's been two years going strong for me, and I don't feel like I missed much. Reading the articles online and then following up with additional info is way to go.

  • no, fox news and the conservative media get criticized because they spout lies and have terrible journalism ethics pushing the same, old tired rhetoric. that is exactly what this video is showing, and for you to claim that they get attacked because they show "the other side of the story" is asinine. its called exposing liars for the scum that they are, and fox news is pure scum. and i love how you claim, "YOU MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT"... yeah, how about reporting bullshit to their viewers?

  • The fact is they do show the otherside of stories which don't get played in the media. They also show stories the media won't cover like Pelosi being caught in a lie about what she knew per the CIA. If that had been a republican speaker it would be headline news and covered by all stations and questions would be "should the speaker resign"?