Drug comanies do not put out drugs to cure people from their ills, because every healthy person is a disaster as far as they are concerned. Their game is to make and to keep people sick, because that makes for a large customer base.
I got the vaccine. I had no adverse side effects. I'm glad I got it.
Why would you not vaccinate your daughter and protect her from cervical cancer? How can you trust your daughter's future spouse to not have it? Say your daughter's (future) husband is a good Christian man now (for all the people up in arms about this from the religious right). Was he a good Christian man years earlier?
Gardasil has nothing to do with cancer prevention. It's an ugly money-making racket by a manufacturer involved in the manufacture of biologcal warfare agents. I wouldn't stick this filth into my dog, let alone any daughter of mine.
OK, come into my lab where we can culture normal cervical cells and infect them with HPV. Let the culture grow for a while. Then we can do a karyotype on the CANCER CELLS that have been produced from HPV infection. We can then assess the karyotype of the cancer cells. The cells have polyploidies and continue to mutate and grow; they continue to get extra chromosomes, a hallmark of cancer cells. The cells also have high levels of telomerase, a hallmark of cancer cells. Gardasil can prevent that.
I don't believe anything these people say. Merck falsified the safety studies to show that Vioxx was safe, and now they are going to use the money they're making with their fake HPV prevention vaccine to pay for the compensation to the families of the 55,000 people who were killed by Vioxx.
In the USA alone, some 50 young women have been killed by Gardasil.
Many more girls and young women have been crippled or have suffered other serious reactions to this evil potion.
The claim that Gardasil prevents HPV is for morons. Much more likely, these girls may suffer from cancers and infertility years later. I wouldn't give this vaccine to a dog or to a rat, let alone any daugher of mine. Anyone who allows their daugher to be injected with this filth is IMO not the full quid.
I believe the shot is dangerous, but that is my opinion. there could be serve adverse side effects product on by the vaccine...I'm studying medicine and disease and I believe the shot will do more harm then good in the years to come...
I totally agree with you. This shot is IMO much more likely to cause cancer than to prevent it. This vaccine has already caused the deaths of over 50 young women in the USA alone. I suspect that this vaccine may also cause infertility later in life.
While I am not in disagreement on the fact that there needs to be a vaccination for this virus I am a bit skeptical about a mandate at this stage in the game. There has not been enough time for any negative effects if any to appear. Look at what happened with vioxx and the drugs like it...only a few short years later after its release the public is notified that it is more dangerous than previously known.
Drug comanies do not put out drugs to cure people from their ills, because every healthy person is a disaster as far as they are concerned. Their game is to make and to keep people sick, because that makes for a large customer base.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Nancy Snyderman is a known pro-vaccination fanatic and pharma industry shill.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Genetics/biology person here.
I got the vaccine. I had no adverse side effects. I'm glad I got it.
Why would you not vaccinate your daughter and protect her from cervical cancer? How can you trust your daughter's future spouse to not have it? Say your daughter's (future) husband is a good Christian man now (for all the people up in arms about this from the religious right). Was he a good Christian man years earlier?
raawrasaurus 2 years ago
Gardasil has nothing to do with cancer prevention. It's an ugly money-making racket by a manufacturer involved in the manufacture of biologcal warfare agents. I wouldn't stick this filth into my dog, let alone any daughter of mine.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
OK, come into my lab where we can culture normal cervical cells and infect them with HPV. Let the culture grow for a while. Then we can do a karyotype on the CANCER CELLS that have been produced from HPV infection. We can then assess the karyotype of the cancer cells. The cells have polyploidies and continue to mutate and grow; they continue to get extra chromosomes, a hallmark of cancer cells. The cells also have high levels of telomerase, a hallmark of cancer cells. Gardasil can prevent that.
raawrasaurus 2 years ago
I don't believe anything these people say. Merck falsified the safety studies to show that Vioxx was safe, and now they are going to use the money they're making with their fake HPV prevention vaccine to pay for the compensation to the families of the 55,000 people who were killed by Vioxx.
In the USA alone, some 50 young women have been killed by Gardasil.
Many more girls and young women have been crippled or have suffered other serious reactions to this evil potion.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
The claim that Gardasil prevents HPV is for morons. Much more likely, these girls may suffer from cancers and infertility years later. I wouldn't give this vaccine to a dog or to a rat, let alone any daugher of mine. Anyone who allows their daugher to be injected with this filth is IMO not the full quid.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Good job. Another conspiracy theorist that lacks the mental capacity for sound science.
raawrasaurus 2 years ago
I believe the shot is dangerous, but that is my opinion. there could be serve adverse side effects product on by the vaccine...I'm studying medicine and disease and I believe the shot will do more harm then good in the years to come...
nucleophilic03 4 years ago
I totally agree with you. This shot is IMO much more likely to cause cancer than to prevent it. This vaccine has already caused the deaths of over 50 young women in the USA alone. I suspect that this vaccine may also cause infertility later in life.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
While I am not in disagreement on the fact that there needs to be a vaccination for this virus I am a bit skeptical about a mandate at this stage in the game. There has not been enough time for any negative effects if any to appear. Look at what happened with vioxx and the drugs like it...only a few short years later after its release the public is notified that it is more dangerous than previously known.
Maliyka 5 years ago
science results can be bought
Nikeforged 5 years ago
Not all those establishments can.
brick4sale 4 years ago