Added: 4 years ago
From: msoltan
Views: 3,289
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • PRESSTV ***** Awesome ! everyone American should at least Google it ,and be a free enough person of mind to view Presstv for yourself.They have a very professional format, I have never seen on U.S. networks. Presstv New is Global breaking News They Covered a full spectrum of documentary.There forums offer open debate.Gaza is hot.Yet expect to see.life in a Mexican town,or interviews with the residence of Columbine,describing their lives after that day.Quality programing amust see !

  • Jesus Loves your people, Iran!

  • One of the most primitive and cheap propaganda channels available. Even worse than poor liars from "Russia today". Made by pigs who don't even bother to wear ties to respect the western tradition while making propaganda to the western viewers. Watch it for 5 minutes and you would never like to see or hear it again.

  • the only truth your tounge spilled is that, its no where close to as your fox, cnn etc news (you people are blinded by your media who are telling lies and spreading propaganda) SEE AND WATCH THE TRUTH WITH PRESSTV AND AL JAZEERA

  • I read news at presstv . ir and russiatoday . com regurarly. They are good news channels. Look at a lot of their reports on youtube as well. Only believing in the news from the west is the same at only liking the "cool kid" at school because everybody else does too.

  • You may believe or not believe the news you receive from the western outlets. What is clear is that CNN, Sky, BBC, DW or even Al Jazeera and Al Arabia always check the facts before publishing them, give tribune to wide range of opinions and never deal with promoting the interests of their funders (except Al Jazeera who're complimenting Qatar). Could the same be said about primitive propaganda tools like "Press(lies) TV" and RT?

  • When PressTV during the latest conflict where giving tribune EXCLUSIVELY to one-sided position, were reporting false facts on purpose etc. And RT - was there ever a criticism of Kremlin's policies? How about the lies they're spreading about Ukraine. It's disappointing to know there are people out there who actually tend to take these underlevel propaganda tools seriously

  • It is fascinating how naive you are:

    Point 1

    No body every gives money for anything without expect something back; unless it is charity.

    Point2

    The problem is not the things the western media is publishing, but what it is leaving out, or bagatalizing.

    Point3

    "not promoting the intrests of their funders",,, just leaving out shit they do.

    Pont 4

    This goes for all news agancies, but at least presstv and RT is not trying to conseal what they represent. Thats called being truthfull.

  • Speaking about the naivity you're just making Putin and Ahmadinedjad very happy. Probably they wouldn't ever dream of having their cheap propaganda pudels taken seriously by anyone who is able to think, compare and analyze. Well, looks like for every product no matter how poor, ridiculous and one-sided it might be there will always be a blind buyer, willing to hail propaganda in it's best Goebbels-inspired traditions

  • I would say the same about you. Talking about lack of "analyzing" skills. Good luck comparing news channels who all follow your demands of "objectivity" and "seeing all sides of one case". I recommend Fox news channel. ...And since your talking about the nazi-pary. Did you know they burnt their party-building down and blamed their political opponent. This resulted in them winning the election. Hmm... I wonder what two countries today are using their techniques the most... Open your eyes.

  • Yeah, global conspiracy is a theory we know well, even before the Goebbels era. Of course, a pity for him, he didn't have Press(lies)TV and RT back in those days. Otherwise they would fit the context perfectly. After all, as these 2 primitive propaganda instruments show, you don't have to invest much of money or build years-long reputation. You just have to manipulate with the facts and pictures as much as you can to make the most unbelievable lies look true somehow. And viewer?Some will buy it.

  • Maybe they are have are getting more and more popular because they are proving what most of the people in the world think but cant prove.

    As long as the western media is reacting as it is towards them, it is clear that something they are saying is making sense and they don't want people listening to it.

    Its been great discussing with you. I respect people who have opinions, but you must broaden your sight past what you have learned all you life. It can be that, at least some of it, is wrong.

  • And here you've reached the good point. All the propaganda channels despite massive presence on every possible satellite and been clearly FTA share a minimal rating. It is baseless to say they're "popular" or getting "more popular". Their rating is and will remain stably low since most of the public, Thank God, can distinguish between information and cheap state-sponsored propaganda from authoritarian regimes of the 3-rd world countries.

  • I disagree; if it was baseless the channel would not have been mentioned anywhere. Let us hope that everybody is as "intelligent" as you say, after all they are not stupid, blind and terrorists like the third world. Evil third world only want to take over the world, specially Iran. That has not started One war in the last 200 years. They truly are warmongers. Unlike the modern countries, that always are peace loving, and never go to war. Only defend them self against someone in their country.

  • I think you should not try to mix your own political views with the topic discussed - impartiality and trustfulness of information provided. None of the propaganda channels that you adore so much fit this criteria. In fact it's not that they're bringing any new, unknown topics. They're bringing the same stories while mixing the item with the political stance of their state-sponsors, marginal puppet "experts", false facts and figures and strong manipulation. And that's a big difference.

  • But what your saying does not make sense. The political opinoins allways shines through a new channel, wether you want to accept it or not. I know that a lot of the things they are saying is not new for you, but for people living around the world, specially the US. A lot is new.

  • "if it was baseless the channel would not have been mentioned anywhere"

    Well, they're not mentioned anywhere on the global scale. Sporadic report here and there, like this one from CNN, regarding the start of the primitive propaganda channel but no serious news agency or any agency (unless it belongs to the same authoritarian camp), quotes or takes their "news" seriously. Same goes for most of the viewers. It's a global world today. You have quality products and you have this kind of rubbish

  • ok, I dont know ehy you use so much time discussing "rubbish". I would not. If i see crap on the sidewalk I dont stand their trying explain that "this is crap". But obviously,,you know that you actually have to "prove" that this is crap. And real crap does not need to get proved. Clearly..it cant be, that its only "onesided, rubbish". They are shining light on things that some people dont want to much light on, cause like vampire,,these facts can't live too long in light.

  • "The crap" proves it for itself better than any discussion possible. But if I see blind people on the sidewalk I would warn them that there's a very stinky russian and iranian crap ahead. If the blind want to get into it, smell it and eat it - it's their right and desire. I wish that "the crap" would really :shine a light on dark things". But there's not even a single exclusive event.When the aim is propaganda you can't really do a news channel. It's a matter of analysis not the matter of item.

  • Even blind people can smell, but thats just a meaningless answer to your meaningless reply. You did not answer, and you are repeating your self. It is clear that everybody that does not see the same as you in this case is blind. You truly are a perfect person/analyst.

  • See, when you have nothing much to defend the position you're switching fast to being personal and partial.The topic of this discussion is not my or your political views(which you're trying to integrate into your answers) but rather the quality, impartiality, fairness, scale of opinions, technical and moral aspect of the information which propaganda channels provide or rather as could be seen do not provide to the viewers. You can like or dislike western policies. One thing is clear: ->continued

  • There are channels who know their job: bringing news from all corners of the world and bringing only the proven facts, while given all sides equal opportunity to present their views and there are those who come up with a cheap, cowardly lying picture while trying to mask a state-sponsored and endorsed agenda and propaganda behind a primitive visual clone of the "news channel"

  • Im just going to copy-paste my earlier statements as well now; without rearranging the words;

    "I read news at presstv . ir and russiatoday . com regurarly. They are good news channels. Look at a lot of their reports on youtube as well. Only believing in the news from the west is the same at only liking the "cool kid" at school because everybody else does so too. "

    I recommend everybody to look at both RT and presstv in addtion to other news channels to make a better picture! :)

  • It is clear how modern they are, and how primitive presstv and RT is. Everything that is not popular in certain peoples eyes is not modern or is "terrorist" these days. Presstv and russiatoday will allways be primitive in your eyes because of what they represent. I like George Carlins remarks on american media "unpayed employees of the department of defense". Turning a a blind eye to things is as bad as lying.

  • press tv is allowed much more freedom than iran's other news networks. although i doubt that there hasn't been even one incident of censorship, it isn't as restricted as this video is implying. press tv invites guests from all backgrounds on its talk shows (including a lot of neo cons), and even sometimes, unlike iran's other channels, criticizes the current iranian administration

  • goooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! press tv

  • If I were the PressTV head I would hire Aneesh Ramin at any price.... :)

  • i really love how aneesh reports. gogogo

  • evry country has red lines not only iran. 4 exm. usa has red lines too.

    now press tv is good and will be better in feu.

  • The future is made right here right now ! Let it be written...we were pressed in real hard...but we managed to Press on even harder!...with speaking out the unspeakable basics of a long lost truth...!!! Press On Press T.V. !! Forward is the path...!! Just make sure you don't get sucked into the same corp media censorship that relies on lies !!! Way to go !

  • presstv is good and grat but not cnn

  • great job

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more