Added: 3 years ago
From: bionerd23
Views: 61,039
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (582)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Where can you get one of those radiation detecting devices? I'd like to make sure I'm not currently being fried to death in my own home..

  • @guitargod909 check out ebay, those guys seem to be drowning in them

  • Superman would have a bad time there

  • mmm... what someone can do with all that uranium?

  • Goiana?!.. Then what about Falluja, Kirkuk, Bagdad, Basra, a good part of Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo and Serbia?!..Or Lybia recently! Fully populated places! Not in the middle of the jungle! Or Chernobyl (Kiev) or Fukushima!.. Goiana is zero compared to these. If you really have guts go to one of those places!... Chernobyl is around 1000 km from Berlin, why bother going to Brasil?!.. It's far and expensive. Do you know what I think?!.. I think you actually wanna go to Rio, not to Goiana!... :P

  • You re so crazy!... :) why are you doing this?... There are plenty of nice guys in this world, for real!.. (even if you probably don t find them at every corner, that s probably true, but that s also true for ladies, too!.. :) ) anyway, why Brazil? Where and why is radioactivity there?! There are no nukes there as far as I know.. Rather Irak and Afghanistan should be checked (or wherever US military has intervened)...

  • @raitaleo Goiania.

  • Some guy has really got this lady so pissed that she finds digging for uranium and collecting it in her bathroom real fun and the time of her life!.. Is she still alive?... By the way, if she is so courageous why doesn t she go check out radioactivity levels in Bosnia, Kosovo, Lybia, Cernobyl, Fukushima, Semipalatinsk, Nova Zemlea, Nevada and other such fun places that will continue to spread for the next couple of billions of years what other curious people experimented.

  • @raitaleo

    thanks for the suggestions! i am working on visiting both chernobyl and brazil within the next months for a report on the levels of radioactivity there. i dont know how to get permission to enter the fukushima area currently - but if anybody has a suggestion, let me know, and i'll be on my way asap. :)

  • I love how open Germany is to its public, like, yeah sure, come on in sister! Here in America, if you look in the wrong direction, you might just disappear into one of Cready's black bags if you know what I mean.

  • 5:35 - my mouth dropped open. Very very interesting videos! Thanks for making them. Could I politely suggest you invest in a high definition video camera? Would make it even better!

  • @bored1980

    i did so just recently. couldnt afford a HD camera for a long time. doing science is one thing - but making money, i always failed at that. :P

  • Weißt du bereits, dass dieses Video von der GEMA in Deutschland geblockt wird?

  • "green stuff" "omgah, so pretty"

  • meanwhile in Germany.....

  • If you go to my website you can get a gamma spectrum for Autunite. Autunite is my favorite natural uranium. (Anti-Proton do t co m)

    I a sample from washington State, USA.

    Great video! I love the guy drilling uranium for the tour lol

  • what radiation detector is that

  • dont you just love the german roads that have NO speed limits

  • Hahaha you're so funny... 4:42 totally cracked me up lol. Nice find, I'd love to go rock hunting in a place like that!

  • thumbs up if you got here from a mod from minecraft

  • can you send me few pieces of uranium? i live in Czech republic, so it´s close to you =)

  • Have you ever made yellow cake from your findings? =)

  • would the material you have collected exhibit enough radioactivity such that it might be harmful or even fatal if small amounts were ingested... i say this because as you pointed out yourself, it wouldn't be too difficult to get it all over the house upon returning from a field trip and it could ultimately come into contact with food production surfaces...

    great vid

  • @zillionz No, it would go out along with faeces, causing no damage.

  • @zillionz

    nope, no acute symptoms to be expected if small amounts are ingested. however, may or may not increase the risk for cancer later in life. impossible to tell, as it'd be a stochastic damage with minor amounts of radioactive material, not possible to tell if it was REALLY the uranium ore, or if my cancer came from that one visit to a smoker's bar.

  • @bionerd23 OK, thanks... I was thinking about more acute symptoms and severe cellular damage, such as what happened to Alexander Litvinenko in 2006, although I do realise that the radioactivity with the Polonium-210 used, would be much greater than with your naturally occuring Uranium minerals. I am a toxicologist and thought it interesting that such radioactive minerals were so easy come by in the environment.

    Great videos, always informative, and thanks for responding to my question.

    Zillionz

  • @bionerd23 U HAVE CANCER?!?!?!? should i wory

  • Do you know if construction zones take radiation into account before building residential homes etc...?

  • @logicCplusplus Yeah, if they are building near Chernobyl.

    Why are you afraid of Uranium ore? I bet you'll get irradiated by computer screen, not to mention cell phones, far more than by some natural uranium.

  • @SloveintzWend

    Did I say I was afraid?

  • @logicCplusplus So why do you ask?

  • @SloveintzWend

    how about , out of interest?

  • @logicCplusplus

    precautions to reduce radon levels, especially in basements, are taken in newer buildings, yes.

    government agencies also provide radon measuring equipment for people concerned about that.

  • granite contains uranium and brazil nuts contain radium, and bananas contain radioactive pottasium, consider that the next time you are scared about radiation

  • Hey hey hey, ahhh....Can you reduce uranium oxides from uraninite to uranium metal using magnesium? or maybe coke? If possible, can you try that later and show it for us?

  • "THIS IS REALLY F***KING HOT!!"

  • how come you don't get the radioactive stuff on you're skin?

  • 05:50 It looks like Tiberium From Command and Conquer series :D nice

  • So how dangerous is being in an area like that for a day?

  • what are you doing here STALKER?!

  • Ah, tick-tick-tock...is that the sound of a Geiger counter or my lifespan counting down? It's both!

  • @SteamMonkey115 Freemans Mind for the win :P

  • @SteamMonkey115 She won't have her lifespan going down. That is just some mediocre radiation levels. And she is not eating the materials. She will be fine.

  • @b1912313 Ticking the clock toward cancer :P

  • Yet another informative and interesting video BioNerd!

  • wouldn't having all that uranium ore so close together would create fission and result in plutonium?

  • @modgemtb

    well, it's not possible to create a critical mass from something as impure as the uranium ORE shown here.

    however, there's some spontaneous fission going on in natural uranium; most of it alpha-decays, but some fissions, too (that's why enough of the pure metal U-235 in one spot results in a critical mass). the resulting neutrons, when striking U-238 nuclei, will inevitable result in a few plutonium-239 atoms in the ore - but they're too few to measure.

  • @bionerd23 Was ist Critical Mass?

  • @bionerd23 U238 needs fast neutrons to capture and become Pu239, no? For thermal neutrons, the cross section for U238 is quite small.

  • @cortexedge

    yes. fission neutrons typically have around 2 MeV afaik, so that'll lead to a single capture here and there, i suppose. not enough to detect it with easy means, but the plutonium atoms are there. :)

  • now i now were to get my uranium supply to make me a nuke

  • I just wana know how dangerous it is to search for uranium

  • What level is considered harmful towards human?

  • put it in a fish tank, and see what will happen to the fish.....lol

  • uhm mal ne frage wieviel strahlung kp wie man c vac schreibt xD is tödlich?

  • what type of geiger counter is that?

  • @butterfingers8008 Gamma scout, it's expensive though :)

  • @videotjes damn expensive :(

  • healthy... :D

  • intresting video, but i think you are being reckless with your health anything that can alter your dna should be left alone unless of course its a woman

  • Is that not dangerous?

  • god rests her soul i was at her funeral!

  • Put one under a pillow. I've heard it helps you sleep.

  • Please go to Chernobyl,

    About the radiation after 25 Years!?  Pu-239 has half life of 24,100!

    Just thinking ;)

  • I love you, but please dont get sick, dont play with uranium!

  • ummm GET THE FUCK OUT OF THAR

  • maybe you should irradiate the uranium to get plutonium

  • At what level of radiation does it get dangerous?

  • Your videos certainly reflect your passion for radioactivity. You excite, entertain, and educate, marvelous combination. Many thanks for your dedication and sharing.

  • omg you get cancer of that radioactive stuff

  • 5:30 is purrrrdy. Thanks for that. :)

  • I expected the mine to glow blue, but then again there is no water, so no Cherenkov radiation. Either way, would picking up and physically touching the pitchblende be dangerous? I know it's not that radioactive but isn't uranium toxic?

  • @iElite6809

    you need a PERFECT dipole (so as pure as possible water, H2O - not minerals etc. etc. that are usually in it) AND quite a bit of particle radiation in order to produce cerenkov radiation. :P

    and yeah, uranium is a toxic heavy metal. try not to ingest it.

  • @bionerd23 would you die if you ingested a peice of uranium ore?

  • Comment removed

  • No It is not nearly radioactive enough to enduce any poisoning

  • will you die cuz of that stuff?

  • fahr mal nach süddeutschland, da wird die verstrahlung durch tschernobyl total totgeschwiegen...

  • @thefamousDrFeelgood

    vom wem? von den leuten, die da wohnen? kann schon sein, dass die keine ahnung haben bzw. das ignorieren - ist ja anderswo auch so. das bundesamt fuer strahlenschutz hat aber eine seite, die vor dem verzehr von z.b. wildschweinfleisch warnt, da es mehrere zehntausend becquerel / kg an radio-caesium (Cs-137) enthalten kann (je nach dem, was das schweinderl so gefressen hat im wald).

  • @thefamousDrFeelgood

    hä?? die Strahlenwerte von den Messstellen sind öffentlich abrufbar:

    odlinfo.bfs.de

    Wird also gar nichts totgeschwiegen, aber man muss sich halt informieren und man muss diese Information auch richtig verstehen um sie korrekt bewerten zu können.

  • What Does Uranium Useful For In Such Little Quantitys?

  • DELICIOUSLY RADIOACTIVE! >:3

  • cool, are they hot or warm? I mean the Uraniums.

  • mi regali un sasso di uranio? io ti regalo una piastrella radioattiva...

  • ты дура блять,хочешь лучевую болезнь на 4:30 споймать???

  • 6 – 10 Sv (6000 – 10000 mSv): Above symptoms plus central nervous system impairment; death expected.

  • Those alien rocks are cool but they tend to scare me.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @bionerd23 that ain't healthy butcould you maybe explain how uranium forms? cauze i'd really like to know that

  • @bionerd23 ,can you please tell me the exact location of the mine, there is a slight posibillity im gonna travel there

  • At 4:30 you have the meter set to detect both alpha, beta and gamma.

    (The lever positioned to the right)

    Does not that affect the results?

    Earlier in the video you have it set to only count gamma. (The lever pointing straight forward)

  • @aoeiyu

    of course it does, yeah. with the "gamma" setting, only hard betas and gammas are measured. with the "alpha" setting, even alpha radiation is measured, which of course produces higher pulses. it's not practical to leave the sensitive window exposed in the field, though, but sorry for any confusion... please see e.g. watch?v=MvzqBs3KHAg for more info.

  • Yea Uranium from reactors produces sieverts not your little micro sieverts. A sievert is the amount of disintegration per second in a kilogram of mass. Rather dangerous but if you don't care about your life span then its not a big deal.

  • @JmMcC82 Wrong! Sievert is a SI unit [J/kg] of absorbed radiation energy per kilogram of biological tissue. For non-biological absorbtion, the unit Grey (Gy) is used. Desintegration per second is measured in Bq (Bequerels), while 1Bq=1 desintegration/sec. Fissible Uranium U-235 and Plutonium Pu-239 produce Alpha-radiation (He-nuclei). Human skin or even a sheet of paper is enough to shield this type of radiation.

  • @SH0LVA, @JmMcC82

    a sievert (Sv) is the energy dose multiplied with the radiation weighting factor of the specific radiation (alpha, beta, photon, neutron radiation). the energy dose is the unit Gray (Gy), which is energy divided by absorbing mass, or Joule/Kilogram.

    Becquerel or Curie is the unit for ACTIVITY of a material (as SH0LVA stated).

    U-235 mainly undergoes alpha decay, but rarely also Spontaneous Fission, producing neutrons. daughters of U-235 furthermore emit gamma radiation.

  • @bionerd23 Still wrong! Both Sv and Gy are specific absorbed radiation energy units [J/kg==Ws/kg], while Sv is used for biological tissue (together with the empirically found weighting coefficient) and Gy is used for other matter. The term 'activity' is defined by desintegrations (=decays) per second as mentioned. Nearly correct is however your statement about U-235, when the term 'dauthers' refers to fission products. Also non-fission products can be activated by fast neutrons by n-capturing.

  • Take up smoking as a hobby. You'll live longer.

  • omg are you mad? cant u get cancer from this shit?

  • haha you are fucking awesome.... I was attracted to mineralogy because of the colors and beauty (art school grad) and my favorite was always metatorbenite.

  • Apparently, being near Uranium makes you talk funny. I kid, I kid, cool video.

  • What is radioactive danger noumbers?

  • 3:42 Did you notice that the electrons are moving at this part of the video?

  • Great video! Keep up the good work. I have ordered a dosimeter but they are currently out of stock due to the events in Japan.

    There is a Wiki page that might be interesting called

    'Radiation watch Wiki'

  • Passen sie aber gut auf das sie sich nicht zu viel Radioaktivität ausetzten. Ich möchte mir vorsorglich auch so ein Geigerzähler zulegen.

  • My community is pretty high in Uranium content as well, in America. I always wanted a Geiger counter.

  • super video! wat did you pay for the geiger meter? its a plase here in southern Norway named musekollen that has massive amounts if thorium and uranium i would like to explore.

  • @surplusdriller

    the "alert" version of the "gamma scout" cost me 350 euros.

  • HOLY SHIT!

  • I have read that 100 mSv/year is the lowest level known to increase chance of cancer, Is the Geiger counter you are using calibrated to mSv/hr? If so, just being around those rocks for 1 hour would already be a dangerous limit for the entire year! If I am wrong can someone please let me know. Also, google the "elephants foot at chernobyl" radiation is said to be 10,000 REM which = 100,000 mSv/hr!

  • @justinhhhfan

    no, it reads uSv/h (microsievert/hour). also, the ore is a point source (though not exactly as small as one would imagine a "point", it's still a point source from a sufficient distance). the dose directly AT the source is large, but it quickly diminishes with distance as of the inverse square law. thus, only the hands get the whole dose, but not the whole body. in chernobyl (or now, fukushima), you get the dose reading as a WHOLE BODY DOSE, which makes all the difference.

  • @justinhhhfan 100 millisieverts causes an increase in cancer. the geiger counter is in microsieverts. 1000 micro sieverts in a millisievert.

  • @phixxwutwut

    Ok, thanks for clarifying, I am embarrassed to admit that I payed no attention the the prefix, that makes more sense though.

  • I'n made a secial box for my radioactive minerals.

  • nice video.

    now i know where to get them haha..now to find a mine in Nevada.

    isn't kind of un safe to have all those rocks in your home? do you keep them sealed in a lead lined container? i would be worried long term about it putting radon into the air

  • @bottle2lip

    yeah, i have them in sealed display cases (acrylic and see-through, very nice, you can get them as e.g. train model display cases). that prevents radon from escaping, which is a vital protection.

    further on, i'm shielding the rich pitchblende ore with lead, so called "diver's lead" - basically bricks of lead that are very easy to duct tape together and cheaper than most other forms of "professional" lead bricks.

  • great vid thanks, does it not scare you being around the ore?

  • Are you going to refine it ? Or is it illegal to stick in a bucket of water and hamer into a mud than filter out the heavy uranium from the light rock.

  • @Pdariean

    well, it'd quickly turn illegal to refine uranium, yes. the minerals fall under laws for "minerals for collection purposes", so you can basically stack buckets full of them at home (but should have a LOT of lead then, lol). once you start to actually PROCESS the ore, you have to follow the laws of radiological protection, which only allow certain small quantities (which are clearly defined in the law) to be handled without license. so if you'd process a bucket full, it'd be a crime.

  • geiger counter is called gamma-scout, good make

  • The mineral is called Uraninite(Ουρανίτης in greek) UH2 or UH3

    U=Uranium(Ουράνιο) H =Hydrogen(Υδρογόνο)

  • you haven't use a protective gloves, those uranium dusts might come in contact with your skin, you better have potassium permanganate solution in your home too...

  • so whats the safe level of radaiation?

  • @MCDEVVOMAN

    in theory, there's no "safe" level. any level can cause mutations and cancer. but e.g. a CT scan (8 mSv acute dose) is said to increase your cancer risk by 0.15% - but it does not cause any direct symptoms of radiation sickness, it's only so-called "stochastic" damage. true radiation sickness starts from 200 mSv as an ACUTE dose.

  • lick one and record what happens! I'm curious!

  • @ccrpalex haha man your funny

  • @ccrpalex happening #1 : My tounge started glowing green

    happening #1 : It developed a large growth

    happening #3 it fell off

    happening #4 2 months of recovery

    happening #5 i might by dying soon. Kids : dont lick uranium

  • @northstarprovids Well if you are dying, try rubbing it all over your body see if extra limbs will grow. Eat some, or when u die please go in style and tape it for youtube....

    1. Jump off the plane with no parachute ( Or have forks and spoons instead of parachute... (will be viral vid))

    2. Jump in front of a moving truck at 80mph

    3. Something awesome and creative... :)

  • It's amazing :)

  • Sorry to sound like a sexist but its cool for a lady to take interest for such stuff. Coz most ladies I know are only interested in travel, fancy restaurants & cosmetics.

  • go look at the radiation numbers in hiroshima :P

  • first of i dont think i wold want my body anywhere near that stuff

  • sell it to iran.they will pay you millions

  • If you touch Natural Uranium without gloves, then you are in danger. The particles will harm you over time considering your body is gettings a lot more radiation than normal. (Like the Uranium she put in a bucket to take home, that's dumb. Your meter at home read .15 while the uranium itself read a radiation of 114.7) Use your head lady. Get rid of it.

  • @Bonnman100

    Leme guess you got a B- in physics and think your a nuclear physicist?

  • @snedie69er no, but i know enough about it to know it can be harmful in different ways

  • Uranium that's found in ores does produce more radiation than other elements, but it is natural radiation. This type of radiation in nature does not post a serious health risk. What does post a health risk, is mining Uranium in the presence of radon gas, which is naturally produced by uranium in nature. Other than that, don't get uranium on your skin, even though it is natural, it can still produce harmful outcomes if it's particles are clinging to you 24/7

  • That was never in any case low resolution. All of it was in stunning 360p.

  • This was such a cool video, thanks for posting!!

  • sweet thats fucking uranium

    

  • are you out of your mind????? uranium emmits gamma radiation.... !!!!! you can get cancerrr!!!!!

  • @Liam22Debono it's not the same kind of radiation. 

  • what are rads compared to sieverts am confused on the units am sure a human can recieve up to 200rads and recieve a little but not a lot of poison and the average human takes 1000rads and will die

  • @jcyeahful

    100 rads are 1 sievert.

  • Demnächst kommen in Berlin die Grünen an die Macht, dann is aber aus mit Deinem Hobby, Du verstrahlter Atom-Nerd Du. :)

  • there mostly found in canada

  • OMG! 4:30-4:48!

  • Can you put these in a fish tank with a UV light? That would look cool i bet!

  • I have to say, bionerd, I found this video to be quite facinating and enjoyable to watch.

    It would be nice if some of the commenters would stop with the "you're gonna get cancer and die now" nonsense, showing their ignorance of how radiation actually works.

    Guys, the amount of radiation bionerd is working with is on the order of millisieverts...radiation sickness doesn't start happening until your get into Sievert range (several thousand times more).

  • @RH2dogs

    He is, but in very very low amounts...we are talking millisievert levels. 2-3 sieverts will cause severe radiation sickness, and we are way below that point.

  • Well, "Uranocicite" and "Autonite" are pronounced similar, except the "nite" is pronounced with a long "i" sound (=ei as in "heil")

  • Comment removed

  • lol in the mine where germans.

  • lol you now have leukimia thanks for uploading!

    7.4 and up is sufficient to alter your cells Genetic DNA please dont have children

  • how do you not get radiation poisoning? and could i do that if i went to berlin?

  • @Ricky32908

    1. the dose rate is MUCH too low to induce radiation poisoning

    2. no, as these rocks cannot be found in berlin in abundance, you'd need to go to middle-east or southern germany.

  • isnt that toxic???

  • Just more one thing. If you turn the UV light on, can you see the autunite or any others uranium sources shining without using a camera?

  • @cassiavc

    yes you can, no problem at all. they luminescence occurs in colors that are visible to the human eye (green). :)

  • @bionerd23 so how do you separate the uranium from the rocks?

  • Mich würde mal interessieren, kann man denn bei den ehemaligen Wismut-Bergwerken einfach so Urane mitnehmen? Bei uns in der Nähe (ca. 30 bis 40 Kilometer) bei Weißenstadt hatte die BRD mal versucht Uran abzubauen für Kernkraftwerke, wurde allerdings nix, wegen Finanziellen und so. Habe zwar aus Weißenstadt was, auch von der Wismut aus Aue, jedoch strahlt das nich so schlimm, will mehr Strahlung ^^

  • @NuklearTV

    ja, schon. ist in deutschland nicht verboten. allerdings sind die halden privatbesitz, d.h. da gelten auch "hausrechte". die wismut-halden werden derzeit vollstaendig "instandgesetzt", d.h. die landschaftliche zerstoerung wird rueckgaengig gemacht; saemtliche halden werden mit erde bedeckt und beforstet. in ein paar jahren ist nix mehr mit mineralien finden, leider... unter der woche sind dort dementsprechend arbeiten in gange und betreten verboten.

  • @NuklearTV

    am wochenende sagt der sicherheitsdienst bei ein paar leuten (nicht mehr als 2-3) aber nix und ignoriert das ganze (die fahren da aber laufend lang, je nach personal und gemuetszustand ;) koennen die dann einen auch der halde verweisen, schliesslich besteht dort z.b. verletzungsgefahr durch absturz.

    andere halden wiederum wurden z.b. als "wanderweg" gestaltet, z.b. die spitzkegelhalden in mechelgruen... ein uranwanderweg, echt lustig. :)

    da ist aber schon alles "geerntet"...

  • @bionerd23 Schade, dann werd ich wohl lieber noch mal um Weißenstadt laufen. Dort wird interessanter weise nichts reanturisiert, jedoch wurde hier auch in einem Stollen abgebaut.

  • @bionerd23 Von dort habe ich auch noch einen Stein, da weiß ich leider nur nicht was es ist. Der strahlt auch, komme aber nur auf 2,5 bis 3,0 µSv (hauptsächlich Alphastrahler) , leider weiß ich nicht, was das für ein Gestein ist. Nach rund einem Jahr, auch wenn man es ein Jahr Zuvorher entfernt hat, zerfällt der und es bildet sich irgendwie ein Staub...

  • @bionerd23 Hast vielleicht du Wissen darüber, was das sein könnte, also was für ein Stoff eventuell? Hinweise auf Uran habe ich in dem Gestein keine, weiß leider nicht.

  • @NuklearTV

    hmm, nee, so kann man darueber nichts sagen... meta-formen der minerale (d.h. wasserentzug, sprich: austrocknung / lagerung an der luft) sind oft bruechig... das heisst nix spezifisches...

  • @bionerd23 Naja gut, der Stein ist auch schon einige Jahre alt ^^

    Kann durchaus sein, darüber kenne ich mich nicht so aus. Interessanter weise, mein Vater hat eine vollständige Uranmineraliensammlung, jedoch ist solch ein Stein wie wir ihm im Haus haben nicht dabei. Nagut, trotzdem danke.

  • Lustig. Sehr "natürlich" die alte Uran-Mine! Naja...für nen Berliner ist ja irgendwie alles Natur, was ausserhalb der Stadt ist, oder?

  • Where can I get one of those radioactivity reading devices you have... I want one =D