@alohawarefox just because its blown up dosent mean its dead. Replacing an engine is a simple job. I've pulled the engine out of my 91 turbo more times than I care to count
N/A MkIII's came with 4.10's in the rear stock (turbo's were 3.90s 86-88 3.70s 89-92...........that helps alot especially when camaros only came with 3.08-3.42s in the rear . MKIII's weight was 3600-3850 depending on targa or non targa top, 5 speed or automatic, turbo or non turbo.
Excuses excuses... Mk3 aka 86.5-92 supras NON-turbo made 200hp crank at a gross weight of 4600 lbs.. So for an inline 3.0 makin 200hp smoking your dumb ass smog excuse camaro is jap engineering for you.. Hahaha
@kueseng where are you getting your numbers for weight... the fact that you have to make yourself bigger than the other guy.. HEY GUYS MY SUPRA WEIGHS 3400LBS. IDK WTF THIS GUY IS TALKING ABOUT. yes heavy still but no production mk3 will weigh 4600lbs you just have a small dick and a big mouth
@kushasweets it was born a 89 N/A, i put a ct26 and swapped to a R154 tranny and of course your normal bolt ons. but im appalled that this guy would say a mk3 is 4600lbs... unless hes blind and driving a dualy!
Low HP numbers from american V8s and basically all their engines were because of emissions of the time, they had preassure to make the engines produce the least smog possible, they managed that with restricting intakes, head, exhaust and tune, a basic 5.7 chevy made what ? 245 stock, all those items were modded and the motor would make 350 easy with no turbo or supercharger, remember in the 60s those same motors had 350 to 400 hp out of the factory stock.
@apocberlin1984 off the line the supra had the edge, but half way down the camaro passes it, now this is a relitivly fair race, not like that other BS like a supra with 50K under the hood vs some resored mucle car, some kids these days need to look reaalllyyy grow a set and use their dam brains.
looks and sounds like an N/A supra with an open diff... the basic of the basics and still walked the supposed 'american muscle' lmao
i still am very confused how people can defend those american trash piles.... no power and extremely overweight... come to think of it, american cars resemble american people :P
@enigmaPL its a personal preferance on what car people like, i personaly thing all imports look like shit. my opinion, and mine alone. i think their over rated and get wayyy to much support over nothing important. their timeless clasics and a part of history kept alive. imports are a new aged trend that continues to evolve.
yea but too bad my supra is completely stock with 102k miles. my bros v8 camaro has modifications done to it but he said he's apparently having fuel issues.
i bet u that was a supra wit sum mods and that camaro was proboly a 305 tpi stock. if supra cars were stock, supra would get spanked like a school girl
@jvpwtf69 considering you only get about 230 bhp from a 5 liter v8 that's just bad engineering and the supra has two less cylinders and only 3 liters and without a turbo still push out 205 easy....that's sad. Im not even going to start on the turbo lol
@Emanis12 how high a car revvs determines how much power you can get per cylinder and considering that american muscle cars red line at lower rpms then their engines are more reliable but require more power and torque to perform as well as a car with less power and less torque. american muscle cars are more about the driving experience and being able to feel like you're driving a race car for a small amount of money but that doesnt mean there arent nice cars. 2012 mustang 302 boss, check it out
@Emanis12 230 hp from a 5 liter v8 was not bad engineering, it was bad politics of the day. Obviously, you don't know much about cars and how they were built. The big 3 choked their v8's for CAFE standards. In the meantime, toyota built little gas sippers so they were able to put a little performance into their str8 6 bangers. If you think chevy can't build a word beater engine, you are sadly mistaken....
Even an NA mk3 should beat a 305 camaro easy. btw either are 4600lbs lol both are about the same +/- 100-200lbs or so. I like them both, too =)
corollafrenzy 2 weeks ago
supra for life
naher1 4 months ago 2
@radmaxxxx what are you basing that on? your stupidity? or your lack of vehicle knowledge? take your pick
enigmaPL 4 months ago
@alohawarefox just because its blown up dosent mean its dead. Replacing an engine is a simple job. I've pulled the engine out of my 91 turbo more times than I care to count
rapom61393 4 months ago
Both of these cars are gone forever and prolly crushed to nothing. May they both rest in pieces lol ~Owner of video
alphawerefox 5 months ago
N/A MkIII's came with 4.10's in the rear stock (turbo's were 3.90s 86-88 3.70s 89-92...........that helps alot especially when camaros only came with 3.08-3.42s in the rear . MKIII's weight was 3600-3850 depending on targa or non targa top, 5 speed or automatic, turbo or non turbo.
thebubba1 5 months ago
Comment removed
thebubba1 5 months ago
Excuses excuses... Mk3 aka 86.5-92 supras NON-turbo made 200hp crank at a gross weight of 4600 lbs.. So for an inline 3.0 makin 200hp smoking your dumb ass smog excuse camaro is jap engineering for you.. Hahaha
kueseng 5 months ago
@kueseng where are you getting your numbers for weight... the fact that you have to make yourself bigger than the other guy.. HEY GUYS MY SUPRA WEIGHS 3400LBS. IDK WTF THIS GUY IS TALKING ABOUT. yes heavy still but no production mk3 will weigh 4600lbs you just have a small dick and a big mouth
kushasweets 3 months ago
@kushasweets it was born a 89 N/A, i put a ct26 and swapped to a R154 tranny and of course your normal bolt ons. but im appalled that this guy would say a mk3 is 4600lbs... unless hes blind and driving a dualy!
kushasweets 3 months ago
3rd gen camaros were all under powered heavy cars.
wkeil1981 6 months ago
@wkeil1981 true...but high 14s in a quarter mile aint bad :)
videoman191 5 months ago
Low HP numbers from american V8s and basically all their engines were because of emissions of the time, they had preassure to make the engines produce the least smog possible, they managed that with restricting intakes, head, exhaust and tune, a basic 5.7 chevy made what ? 245 stock, all those items were modded and the motor would make 350 easy with no turbo or supercharger, remember in the 60s those same motors had 350 to 400 hp out of the factory stock.
cubano1389 6 months ago
@apocberlin1984. That camaro prolly had the 305 only puttin out 205 hp, whoopdyfuckindo
shoppy16 6 months ago
96turboSE...HA...you're gona have to upload that for me to believe
shoppy16 6 months ago
Doesn't the owner of this Supra live inn like Schnecksville,Pa area?
caos285 8 months ago
@caos285 That car is dead now, sold it over a year ago and the 19 yr old kid blew it up.
alphawerefox 7 months ago 5
@alphawerefox Wow, that's terrible! I seen it a few times by a garage but than it disappeared and I think there's a BMW I think an older one..
caos285 7 months ago
@alphawerefox man thats really sad... supra is not a kids junker car.
nicksuprabravesfan 6 months ago
@alphawerefox sad face ,parts!!!
sleeperblacking 3 weeks ago
@M335 @M335 LSD s available with N/A Supras that have the sport package and all turbos include LSD stock...
Final drive ratio are:
N/A:
All- 4.30:1
Turbos:
pre89- 3.91:1
+89- 3.73:1
boykeno 1 year ago
@M335 LSD s available with N/A Supras that have the sport package and all turbos include LSD stock...
Final drive ratio are:
N/A:
All- 4.30:1
Turbos:
pre89- 3.91:1
+89- 3.73:1
boykeno 1 year ago
@M335 yes.. on certain ones..
SRZsmack 1 year ago
@M335 Some have it, some dont. I need to find out if mine has it. >:)
Totenhosen17 1 year ago
muahahaha. The supra burns the Camaro... Fucking V8- Bullshit...
apocberlin1984 1 year ago
@apocberlin1984 off the line the supra had the edge, but half way down the camaro passes it, now this is a relitivly fair race, not like that other BS like a supra with 50K under the hood vs some resored mucle car, some kids these days need to look reaalllyyy grow a set and use their dam brains.
CemetaryGatesML 1 year ago
@apocberlin1984 v8 is the ony way to go dude
Irocguy85 1 year ago
your car is the worst son...
rwhittmore 1 year ago
@rwhittmore yeah okay freak dyke wanna be nigga
BarracudaCamaro 1 year ago
that camaro has mods? like what? with exhaust it should be able to beat that supra
zachkuby87 1 year ago
camaros and supras their good.
jesuselmexicanarts 1 year ago
91 camaro looks way more badass though
derkoid999 1 year ago
looks and sounds like an N/A supra with an open diff... the basic of the basics and still walked the supposed 'american muscle' lmao
i still am very confused how people can defend those american trash piles.... no power and extremely overweight... come to think of it, american cars resemble american people :P
enigmaPL 2 years ago
@enigmaPL its a personal preferance on what car people like, i personaly thing all imports look like shit. my opinion, and mine alone. i think their over rated and get wayyy to much support over nothing important. their timeless clasics and a part of history kept alive. imports are a new aged trend that continues to evolve.
CemetaryGatesML 1 year ago
supra whoops ass agen
bradygd 2 years ago
not spanked i dont think, the supras amazing top end would keep it in the race
HDtenor1 2 years ago
Fixed it Today!!!!!!!!!!!!Oh Shizzle :)
nostalgia6883 2 years ago
Ps no answers for what's in my car!
Top SecreT :)
nostalgia6883 2 years ago
Major fuel pressure issues it was:(But my bro's supra is FaSt though! There will be rematches and even more of our families cars racing soon!
nostalgia6883 2 years ago
yea but too bad my supra is completely stock with 102k miles. my bros v8 camaro has modifications done to it but he said he's apparently having fuel issues.
alphawerefox 2 years ago
@alphawerefox hey bro i gotta 88 supra and was wondering where you got that supra sticker on your windsheild cause its SICK...please let me know
TheMuscleHamster77 8 months ago
@alphawerefox my v8 91 is having fuel issues too :\ it was switch to carbeurator though
BRutAL42Zero 5 months ago
i bet u that was a supra wit sum mods and that camaro was proboly a 305 tpi stock. if supra cars were stock, supra would get spanked like a school girl
jvpwtf69 2 years ago
@jvpwtf69 considering you only get about 230 bhp from a 5 liter v8 that's just bad engineering and the supra has two less cylinders and only 3 liters and without a turbo still push out 205 easy....that's sad. Im not even going to start on the turbo lol
Emanis12 8 months ago
@Emanis12 how high a car revvs determines how much power you can get per cylinder and considering that american muscle cars red line at lower rpms then their engines are more reliable but require more power and torque to perform as well as a car with less power and less torque. american muscle cars are more about the driving experience and being able to feel like you're driving a race car for a small amount of money but that doesnt mean there arent nice cars. 2012 mustang 302 boss, check it out
TheZohaun 8 months ago
@Emanis12 its a little more then 205, my 87 turbo was nearly stock, just had a 3 inch downpipe and was putting down 250hp at the wheels.
96turboSE 6 months ago
@Emanis12 230 hp from a 5 liter v8 was not bad engineering, it was bad politics of the day. Obviously, you don't know much about cars and how they were built. The big 3 choked their v8's for CAFE standards. In the meantime, toyota built little gas sippers so they were able to put a little performance into their str8 6 bangers. If you think chevy can't build a word beater engine, you are sadly mistaken....
donnis618 6 months ago
305 or 350?? in the maro of course
anythingthatgoes 2 years ago
Fuck yeah! Supra power!
Jester054 2 years ago