Added: 2 years ago
From: alphawerefox
Views: 27,174
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Even an NA mk3 should beat a 305 camaro easy. btw either are 4600lbs lol both are about the same +/- 100-200lbs or so. I like them both, too =)

  • supra for life

  • @radmaxxxx what are you basing that on? your stupidity? or your lack of vehicle knowledge? take your pick

  • @alohawarefox just because its blown up dosent mean its dead. Replacing an engine is a simple job. I've pulled the engine out of my 91 turbo more times than I care to count

  • Both of these cars are gone forever and prolly crushed to nothing. May they both rest in pieces lol ~Owner of video

  • N/A MkIII's came with 4.10's in the rear stock (turbo's were 3.90s 86-88 3.70s 89-92...........that helps alot especially when camaros only came with 3.08-3.42s in the rear . MKIII's weight was 3600-3850 depending on targa or non targa top, 5 speed or automatic, turbo or non turbo.

  • Comment removed

  • Excuses excuses... Mk3 aka 86.5-92 supras NON-turbo made 200hp crank at a gross weight of 4600 lbs.. So for an inline 3.0 makin 200hp smoking your dumb ass smog excuse camaro is jap engineering for you.. Hahaha

  • @kueseng where are you getting your numbers for weight... the fact that you have to make yourself bigger than the other guy.. HEY GUYS MY SUPRA WEIGHS 3400LBS. IDK WTF THIS GUY IS TALKING ABOUT. yes heavy still but no production mk3 will weigh 4600lbs you just have a small dick and a big mouth

  • @kushasweets it was born a 89 N/A, i put a ct26 and swapped to a R154 tranny and of course your normal bolt ons. but im appalled that this guy would say a mk3 is 4600lbs... unless hes blind and driving a dualy!

  • 3rd gen camaros were all under powered heavy cars.

  • @wkeil1981 true...but high 14s in a quarter mile aint bad :)

  • Low HP numbers from american V8s and basically all their engines were because of emissions of the time, they had preassure to make the engines produce the least smog possible, they managed that with restricting intakes, head, exhaust and tune, a basic 5.7 chevy made what ? 245 stock, all those items were modded and the motor would make 350 easy with no turbo or supercharger, remember in the 60s those same motors had 350 to 400 hp out of the factory stock.

  • @apocberlin1984. That camaro prolly had the 305 only puttin out 205 hp, whoopdyfuckindo

  • 96turboSE...HA...you're gona have to upload that for me to believe

  • Doesn't the owner of this Supra live inn like Schnecksville,Pa area?

  • @caos285 That car is dead now, sold it over a year ago and the 19 yr old kid blew it up.

  • @alphawerefox Wow, that's terrible! I seen it a few times by a garage but than it disappeared and I think there's a BMW I think an older one..

  • @alphawerefox man thats really sad... supra is not a kids junker car.

  • @alphawerefox sad face ,parts!!!

    

  • @M335 @M335 LSD s available with N/A Supras that have the sport package and all turbos include LSD stock...

    Final drive ratio are:

    N/A:

    All- 4.30:1

    Turbos:

    pre89- 3.91:1

    +89- 3.73:1

  • @M335 LSD s available with N/A Supras that have the sport package and all turbos include LSD stock...

    Final drive ratio are:

    N/A:

    All- 4.30:1

    Turbos:

    pre89- 3.91:1

    +89- 3.73:1

  • @M335 yes.. on certain ones..

  • @M335 Some have it, some dont. I need to find out if mine has it. >:)

  • muahahaha. The supra burns the Camaro... Fucking V8- Bullshit...

  • @apocberlin1984 off the line the supra had the edge, but half way down the camaro passes it, now this is a relitivly fair race, not like that other BS like a supra with 50K under the hood vs some resored mucle car, some kids these days need to look reaalllyyy grow a set and use their dam brains.

  • @apocberlin1984 v8 is the ony way to go dude

  • your car is the worst son...

  • @rwhittmore yeah okay freak dyke wanna be nigga

  • that camaro has mods? like what? with exhaust it should be able to beat that supra

  • camaros and supras their good.

  • 91 camaro looks way more badass though

  • looks and sounds like an N/A supra with an open diff... the basic of the basics and still walked the supposed 'american muscle' lmao

    i still am very confused how people can defend those american trash piles.... no power and extremely overweight... come to think of it, american cars resemble american people :P

  • @enigmaPL its a personal preferance on what car people like, i personaly thing all imports look like shit. my opinion, and mine alone. i think their over rated and get wayyy to much support over nothing important. their timeless clasics and a part of history kept alive. imports are a new aged trend that continues to evolve.

  • supra whoops ass agen

  • not spanked i dont think, the supras amazing top end would keep it in the race

  • Fixed it Today!!!!!!!!!!!!Oh Shizzle :)

  • Ps no answers for what's in my car!

    Top SecreT :)

  • Major fuel pressure issues it was:(But my bro's supra is FaSt though! There will be rematches and even more of our families cars racing soon!

  • yea but too bad my supra is completely stock with 102k miles. my bros v8 camaro has modifications done to it but he said he's apparently having fuel issues.

  • @alphawerefox hey bro i gotta 88 supra and was wondering where you got that supra sticker on your windsheild cause its SICK...please let me know

  • @alphawerefox my v8 91 is having fuel issues too :\ it was switch to carbeurator though

  • i bet u that was a supra wit sum mods and that camaro was proboly a 305 tpi stock. if supra cars were stock, supra would get spanked like a school girl

  • @jvpwtf69 considering you only get about 230 bhp from a 5 liter v8 that's just bad engineering and the supra has two less cylinders and only 3 liters and without a turbo still push out 205 easy....that's sad. Im not even going to start on the turbo lol

  • @Emanis12 how high a car revvs determines how much power you can get per cylinder and considering that american muscle cars red line at lower rpms then their engines are more reliable but require more power and torque to perform as well as a car with less power and less torque. american muscle cars are more about the driving experience and being able to feel like you're driving a race car for a small amount of money but that doesnt mean there arent nice cars. 2012 mustang 302 boss, check it out

  • @Emanis12 its a little more then 205, my 87 turbo was nearly stock, just had a 3 inch downpipe and was putting down 250hp at the wheels.

  • @Emanis12 230 hp from a 5 liter v8 was not bad engineering, it was bad politics of the day. Obviously, you don't know much about cars and how they were built. The big 3 choked their v8's for CAFE standards. In the meantime, toyota built little gas sippers so they were able to put a little performance into their str8 6 bangers. If you think chevy can't build a word beater engine, you are sadly mistaken....

  • 305 or 350?? in the maro of course

  • Fuck yeah! Supra power!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more