race purity and intelligence seems very similar to this. Based on negative stereotypes and a government agenda then passed as science.
They are so ruthless they even give anti-psychotics to the elderly with Demantia and 1000 die a year.
maybe there is last resort use only for these brain altering toxic metal drugs for a temporary problem. the criteria is to make sales and as many as possible and passing laws to force it, including kids.
There's a place in a large city with very bad drinking water, and kids are always getting sick with dysentery. So you keep treating the dysentery, but meanwhile it would be much better to clean up the drinking water... The drugs work on the dysentery for about 48 hours, but you're NOT treating the problem. And the problem is NOT genetic.
psychiatrists : 'yea let's throw dangerous chemicals into a kettle, mixing them, and serving the crap to kids, calling ourselves docs. that would be great business, because they will get damaged so badly, so that their parents think they might need more meds. oh shit, we're just leprechauns in wheelchairs hallucinating in hell.'
WIll you fix software corruption problems of your PC by tampering the hardware of the machine?
The problem is that psychiatry tries to deny personal responsibility of people by blaming the chemicals of the brain, "I did't it kill him, it was my brain chemicals than made me did it"; and to create an addiction by looking a quick fix for deep problems rooted in the social unbringing and nutrition of the person; so they can get them hook in it and mane millions
@JHDiddles12 Being against Psychiatry as such has nothing to do with Scientology, I am have nothing to do with Scientology for example. I just studied the issue through authors, scientists and philosophers like RD Laing, Thomas Szasz, M. Focault, etc., who represent a legitimate criticism of the domain in question. But I agree with you that by a cult - itself irrational and unscientific - attaching itself to the issue it obfuscates in the eye of the public the legitimate critics as well.
This psychiatric madness needs to stop. To many young lives are being DESTROYED because of evil psychiatrists and their brain damaging drugs. If we dont act now to stop these KILLERS, HISTORY WILL REPEAT ITSELF. Psychiatrists are the most DANGEROUS, MOST VILE SUBHUMANS a human being shall ever encounter. THIS ADVERT posted in this video is TRUTH. What you all decide on your lives with mind altering psychiatric toxins is your choices. Be warned though: Once you take these drugs its FOR LIFE.
psychiatrists are killing our society. the new world order. the holocaust. what keeps psychiatrists in business is its brainwashed pill poppers and people who agree with them. all should burn in hell for eternity for destroying civilization. living a life stoned on drugs your better off killing yourself. psychiatrists laugh, you cry.
@thpriest15 Jeremy Perkins was a street drug user, taking hits of LSD, marijuana, cocaine etc. He killed his mother under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Psychiatric drugs are now consuming the life of Jeremy Perkins in the mental institution. He is a lifeless shell. Psychiatry KILLS.
@draziom902 Alright, I've been seeing a psychiatrist since I was 15. He didn't recommend antidepressants or electroshock treatment or any of that the moment I walked in, we sat down, and talked, and you don't know how beneficial it is, i do now take antidepressants, do they help? I would say they definatley do, does it help for everyone? of course not, but psychiatry is a different experience for EVERYONE, does it have its flaws? of course, but i benefit from psychiatry, and that's what matters
@thpriest15 Thats your choice if you want to be drugged. I wont take that away from you. But i will say this. In time your mind and body will deteriorate and get worse while the psychiatric toxins take its toll. You will crumble at the hands of beedy eyed psychiatrists who lick their chops to take your SOUL.
@draziom902 well, it's a risk i'm willing to take. however, if it's a choice between a good psychiatrist, who will readily admit that as a part of his training, he studies both the advantages AND the flaws of his profession, studied it for 5-6 years of his mortal life and readily admits he doesn't have the mind completely mapped out (something that will never happen) to a scientologist, who will arrogantly have me believe that a session a day in a sauna will cure me, well my mind is made up :P
@draziom902 you know what that is? that isn't you trying to look out for me, it's you trying to scare me, into irrational fear. it's fear-mongering! well, no thanks!
@thpriest15 I am absolutely NOT trying to scare you or trying to do you harm. I'm 36 years old and i am taking my TIME to warn you on the extreme dangers of psychiatric drugs. And guess what?.. I TOOK them for 18 YEARS and it has damaged my central nervous system permanently. I was your age when i was drugged (I didnt have the choice to say no). I am absolutely not trying to harm you or scare you or do anything wrong to you. I understand you are suffering and i take that into consideration.
@thpriest15 When you said you felt i was trying to harm you/scare you you made me feel bad because my intention was to save your LIFE. I am warning you on the EXTREME DANGERS of psychiatric drugs. I dont want you to become a vegetable like me. I understand you are suffering and if you message me i can give you links of ALTERNATIVES that will save your LIFE rather than be drugged with these nasty psychiatric toxins. You're a young teen, I would NEVER HARM YOU. NEVER think that. I am not EVIL.
@thpriest15 I wish you all the best in your health. You have the knowledge now of whats happening. The choice you make now is forever. You are still in time to break the chains and become free NOW. OK bro?. I understand you're suffering anxieties, depression, and mental anguish. One of the best methods to cure this is social interaction and counselling. 1-1 counselling (talk therapy) , high end nutrition, good sleep, lots of distraction, and hope. I been through what you feel. I understand.
In the late 50's the CIA had a secret brainwash program code naqmed MKUltra. They paid a Psychiatrist Dr Cameron in Montreal to carry it out. He injected LSD mixed with other drugs, Massive electric shocks and weeks of sleep as a brainwash tape played. It was horrific. I am telling my story on You Tube called youkilledyourmother
@photo986 Sorry to hear you are a victim of the criminal psychiatrists. I hope you sent them to prison. Let the world know about the fraud of psychiatry.
Hate to agree with Cruise, but he is right about Psychiatry. Too bad he's a Scientologist, and that ruins his credibility; so he actually did more harm in that interview than good.
@pashedmotatos Why would you hate to agree with Cruise?. He is right about psychiatry. Why hate to agree with him? Why force the agreement?. Cant think for yourself?
Let's not confuse the two; psychology does have its downfalls, paricularly in many ways that it's applied, but the two disciplines are very different.
@davidjaames You are wrong. Psychology is a pseudoscience and a religion of EVIL. This pseudoscience is what psychiatrists study to control and harm naive innocent human beings. Psychology is nothing but social control. It must be eradicated. The history of psychiatry/psychology has left millions of innocent human beings in BODY BAGS. Follow the money trail, follow the evil empire. The house of cards built by psychiatrists shall be CRUSHED to the GROUND. Their time is up.
hello. thanks for sharing. just a few questions: a gay is an ill person? Not for me. If the answer was yes, please tell me what kind of illness is? and which is the best treatment for?
While psychiatry isn't completely junk science, there are certainly a lot of powerful characters in the field of psychiatry that are very suspect, and use psuedoscientific methods to create a legal drug cartel in conjunction with their partners-in-crime in the Pharmacy industry. But it's important that we don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
"chemical imbalance" is pure bullshit; depression is just "u've been kicked in the ass harder than u can take", that's all. There is no chemical imbalance in ur brain as the cause, we're not machines. If u loose ur arm or can't walk, or dying on cancer - there is no chemical shit wrong in the brain, it's the reality that hits u. Of course u can cover that with many drugs, but it doesn't change the reality, u just don't care, couse u're stoned. Antidepressant do 1 thing - make u stoned and fat.
@maciondo That is a lot of bullshit that sounds like it was shat out in the victorian times,back when the world was flat and if you went too far you would fall off.Chemical imbalances are a reality.Neurotransmitters can be effected by substance misuse,certain illnesses and genetic dispositions.Secondly the majority of anti-depressants do not make you stoned.They merely effect certain chemical aspects of the brain.It's people like you who have fucked up the world in the first place.
@maciondo You've never taken a basic biology class, have you? Because if you had, you'd know how neurotransmitters work. The only reason there are no tests yet is because psychiatry/psychology are emerging sciences. There will be tests in the future, as science advances.
No, buddy. Having tests is the definition of science. If you can't test your hypothesis or falsify it, then it isn't science. So how can you claim "there are no tests because they're emerging sciences". Well shit, there are no tests in astrology because it's an emerging science. But later there will be tests. See how this doesn't work? Your comment therefore does not make sense to a scientist.
I thought this was very basic and taught before biology class.
@sk8teh14 By "no tests" I mean there are no diagnostic tests outside of PET scans or psychological evaluations. I do believe it is possible for doctors to measure the amount of neurotransmitters in the brain, but I think those are expensive procedures. Of COURSE there are tests that exist to validate/disprove hypotheses in psychology, they're coming up with them all the time- we tend to call them experiments. They're usually conducted in universities and hospitals.
But of course, we're not talking about psychology. We are talking about psychiatry which have no tests - whose sole purpose is to pretend that being sad (an observation) is also the same as the explanation (depression). And by tests, I am not as concerned with them being diagnostic. Mainly, they need to confirm a proposed explanation to an observation.
So you have not presented a test, therefore you have said psychiatry is not science.
@sk8teh14 psychiatry takes everything it does from psychology and neuroscience, so to speak of one you must speak of the other.
Also, you overgeneralize. "sadness" =/= depression. Depression is a state of immense hopelessness and despair that simply does not go away no matter what the person tries. It's characterized by a lot more than just "sadness." Don't be ignorant or I'm not going to take you seriously.
@WickedWitchElphaba There have been COUNTLESS studies done on illnesses like depression, and countless tests and experiments done. The most common are PET scans of the brain showing the differences in neural activity. Universities also conduct studies on a daily basis, and new research is being published all the time. Seriously, if you want to learn more about it just go to a damn library.
They HAVE confirmed explanations for the observations. It's called the biopsychosocial model. Google it.
This is not a test. This simply establishes a correlation which is meaningless in science. Your test isn't an explanation, it's an observation - a description. Hence why psychology and psychiatry are called descriptive sciences (aka not science).
To put it simply, if I lose sleep, that will likely show up in a PET scan. So will taking cocaine. It doesn't mean the person losing sleep has an illness. That's just an observation - i.e. what a PET scan looks like for someone who loses sleep.
Ultimately, there's no real reason I should have to address a PET scan. When a person walks into a psychiatrist's office, a doctor will have a hypothesis (the person has what I call depression) and that's it. There is no objective test to confirm or falsify his suspicions. So it's not science. We don't need to even address a PET scan. It's an irrelevant subject.
Therefore, it is my suspicion that you see the word "objective test" and go on a random search. "Hey PET test has the word test in it so this must address what this guy is talking about". I can also test the probability that a Pisces has a cat. It doesn't make astrology any more scientific, regardless of the level of sophistication I use to measure that probability.
Sorry for how many replies I have made, but one familiar with science could spend all day ridiculing the number of scientific fallacies you've presented. Ironically, your apparent ignorance of how science works is the perfect epitome for psychiatry.
"Depression is a state of immense hopelessness and despair that simply does not go away no matter what the person tries."
That's like saying stomach cancer is a state of diarhea and intense stomach pain that does not go away. All I've done is take common symptoms, bunch them together, and stick a label on them. By this definition, someone who ate a bad burrito would also have stomach cancer. This is NOT how science works.
@sk8teh14 I don't believe you are qualified to call me ignorant on the subject of psychology, considering I study it in school. It IS a science, considering it uses the scientific method in ALL of it's experiments. I'm not particularly interested to disecting your entire slew of comments, but I believe you missed my point. You clearly have done very little reading from objective sources- i.e., university studies and scientific journals, about psychological illnesses.
@WickedWitchElphaba Otherwise, you would not hold the opinion that psychological studies are not "real science," nor would you deny the existence of mental illnesses. I'm willing to bet the things you read are from biased anti-psychiatry websites. A social science is still a science. You elitist "hard scientists" annoy the piss out of me. Perhaps PET scans were not the best example to use in my argument, but nonetheless you cannot deny that psychological studies ARE scientific studies.
@WickedWitchElphaba Also I did not describe depression in it's entirety, as the full definition and diagnostic critieria are much longer. You can find the full DSM definition online at any reputable website. The fact that you are even arguing that point with me shows your own ignorance.
Yes, diseases of the mind are a bit trickier- but you forget that the mind and the brain are one and the same. Every thought in our head is controlled by tiny neurons and their activity.
@WickedWitchElphaba To speak of one is to speak of the other. You simply cannot deny the physciality of psychological illnesses- to do so is to deny the existence of you brain.
Unless you want to start arguing "souls", but such discussions do not belong in science.
I agree. Saying for example that someone is possessed because they are seizing gets us no where. I don't suppose you bothered to ever ponder *why* we don't accept this in science. Because I'm defining the observation by the symptom. It's like saying species evolve because of evolve force. It gets us nowhere. Just like saying people are sad because of sad-syndrome - or well..depression.
It doesn't matter whether you described it in its entirety or not. Depression is defined by observations. This is not how science works. I do not test a person for cancer by asking them if they have stomach pain. Many explanations lead to this observation.
>forget that the mind and the brain
I do? When did I even mention the mind or the brain? You're beginning to ramble.
I didn't call you ignorant of psychology or psychiatry. I called you ignorant of science. You don't seem very rigorous in addressing my points. Those two statements are vastly different.
>Scientific method in all its experiments
Not in diagnosing people, not in anything listed in the DSM. As I mentioned, a "mental illness" is just symptoms grouped together
Interestingly enough, this is the first step in the scientific method (observation). The next step is a hypothesis as to the explanation. But since mental illness is not very well defined and best defined by the observation itself, this step has yet to have been taken in the field of psychiatry. So saying they use the scientific method could not be more wrong as they have only progressed through the first step.
@sk8teh14 You're correct in that I'm not feeling very rigorous in arguing with you. I am tired and don't particularly feel well and I'm quite done with this whole thing.
All I know is that every single psychology journal I have ever read has used the scientific method all the way through- from observation to experimentation/conclusions. It's difficult for psychiatry to thoroughly prove the physical explanations for mental illnesses because it IS an emerging science and technology is limited.
@WickedWitchElphaba However, what we DO know is that these illnesses are real problems- and many treatments have shown themselves, in practice to be successful. I have no doubt that in the future mental illnesses will be diagnosed via physical tests, and I have no doubt that soon we will have that hard medical evidence you're looking for. We're close to discovering the biological causes, and technology is getting more and more advanced. Most of the medical community is on my side here.
Yeah I'm sure you will find hard evidence for sibling rivalry disorder and mathematics disorder. I don't really think this is even worth arguing about. I really have trouble understanding how people can take this seriously. But it should be fought. Everywhere you go, you see another article telling us that depression is real and medication is the answer. You also see ads for Cymbalta right next to it. But I'm sure that's a coincidence and not a dark motive.
And what, pray tell, is wrong with people seeking treatment for their problems? Yes, the medications have side effects. ALL medications have side effects. It doesn't mean the drug companies are out to "get us". It means the medical community is developing new medications to treat illnesses that are being recognized as having neurological roots.
Antipsychiatry is an inappropriate word. Psychiatry has never been established to begin with. You agree with me on every point I make. You admit depression (and every mental illness) is defined by the symptoms - which is not how science works. You admit that the PET scan is not valid for establishing psychiatry as science. You admit there are no objective tests. Only in summary can you wash over the topic and pretend you won the argument.
But when it comes to rigorously addressing specific points, you've failed and agreed with me on every one. We have yet to even get into the more ridiculous aspects of psychiatry - such as mathematics disorder, sibling rivalry disorder, etc being listed as mental illnesses. The fact that homosexuality used to be listed as a mental illness. The fact that the last 100 illnesses were "discovered" within a 7 year timespan.
But I don't need to ridicule psychiatry to demonstrate that it is not science. The field does not have to be ridiculous (read: bullshit) for it to not be science. It just happens that psychiatry is not science and is also very ridiculous.
Antipsych isn't to be taken seriously. Because psychiatry has not established itself as a plausible field let alone a scientific field. It's psychiatry's job to establish itself. Antipsych is simply the null hypothesis/default position.
"And what is wrong with people seeking treatment for their problems"
Because it is not based in science as you have freely admitted throughout this discussion. There is no objective test. In fact, the illness is not even a valid hypothesis - it's just defined by the symptoms which is circular reasoning.
I'm not really here to tell you it's wrong to seek help from pseudoscience. I'm here to establish that it is indeed pseudoscience. Something you are agreeing with me on because you admit there are no objective tests.
If you want my opinion on why it's wrong, it's wrong because consumers in general are ignorant of what goes into what they are consuming. I do not know how to set up a cell phone site but I have a cell phone
I do not know how to safely pasteurize milk, but I enjoy drinking milk. This is the nature of a specialist economy. We can trust the person specializing in what they do are doing it right. Psychiatry isn't doing it right but they give no indication of this to anyone walking into their office. It deceives people into believing there is legitimate science behind what they are taking, and this is simply not true. Thus the moral dilemma becomes apparent.
@sk8teh14 The only moral dilemna I see is that you discourage people from getting help they likely desparately need. I'm sorry, but I fail to see how you cannot believe that mental illnesses are not real. We DO have tests for this illnesses that exist on a psychological level- tons of them. Just because you cannot physically test the brain does not mean that a doctor cannot test for these illnesses. Every valid psychological test in existence is empirically derived.
@WickedWitchElphaba I do not agree that psychiatry is a pseudoscience. I agree that it is an EMERGING science, which, you may recall, ALL sciences were at one point. At one point, biology was looking at the earth and coming up with hypotheses based solely on observations. But biology has evolved, and psychiatry is and will continue to do so. At one point, there were thousands of incorrect biological theories, to draw comparison to your homosexuality point. Psychiatry is changing.
@WickedWitchElphaba And it will continue to do so until we get to the point where there WILL be better tests for mental illnesses.
I think what you fail to understand is that just because a science is emerging, doesn't mean it isn't a science and it doesn't meant that it doesn't use the scientific method. There's a LOT we don't understand about the human brain. But we have discovered many correlations between different chemical levels, the PET scans, and the sympotms of mental illnessses.
@WickedWitchElphaba Now, I know that correlations does not always equal causation, but these correlational studies will be the root of what neuroscience and psychology eventually will be able to do with the human brain.
You see, the problem with being a null hypothesis is that we never accept the null- instead we keep studying and experimenting and learning to we are able to reject it. Or have you never taken a basic statistics class?
@WickedWitchElphaba In the end, the problem with people like you who deny psychiatry as anything valid is that it stops people from seeking treatments, and that is interfering with their lives and happiness.
People CANNOT just "snap out of" a mental illness- it cannot be done. They need help, sometimes through therapy, sometimes through drugs. and if the drugs help them, then I see no harm. ALL doctors who prescribe medication are obligated to inform their patients of the possible side effects
@WickedWitchElphaba And all doctors do. At the end of the day it is the patient's, or the person responsible for the patient's decision of whether or not to take the medications. And this anti-psychiatry stuff can scare people away from doing that. The medications rarely harm people- in fact, they do more good than harm, as MANY studies have shown. Yes, antidepressants can in rare cases increase suicidal thoughts, but overall they are beneficent drugs. I used to be on Prozac, and it got me to
@WickedWitchElphaba a point where I was actually able to ween myself off of it. The drugs are NOT addictive, they do NOT do any physical harm to the body, and they DO help- and psychiatry has been able to show why. Anybody who doubts this has very little understanding of neurons and neurotransmitters.
And again, as these fields change and evolve the drugs will become more stream-lined and have less of the unpleasant side effects.
@WickedWitchElphaba I simply see no reason for you to be so against this sort of research. Anything that leads to an expansion of knowledge and new understanding can only be a good thing. Even the Ancient Greeks were aware of that.
Benzo withdrawals are worse then any opiates withdrawals, I can show you ex heroin addicts saying they would rather go through heroin withdrawals 100 more times rather then go through benzo withdrawals again.
Most psych drug have HORRIBLE withdrawals, psychiatric drugs can cause permanent physical damage, the fact that you are denying this infuriates me. Psych drugs KILL people, they are VERY harmful, you uneducated piece of shit.
@JenkemBOMBS Yeah, I'm the uneducated one. That's why I'm currently enrolled at a university.
ALL withdrawals are horrible if done incorrectly. If the drug is weaned off of slowly symptoms won't be nearly as bad.
I think you are over-reacting. I've met plently of people who have been/are on psych drugs. All of them are still alive and well. Most say the drugs helped/help them.
The fact that you encourage people not to seek treatment for their illnesses infuriates me, so I guess we're even.
@JenkemBOMBS Dude, everything you THINK is neurological. No neurons- no thinking. To deny that mental illnesses are neurological is to deny that you have a brain in the first place.
I'm not saying the drugs are the only solution. But sometimes they are when therapy has not worked. Drugs should be something of a last resort.
@WickedWitchElphaba I've never heard of a single person whose life has been "ruined" by a psych drug. I've read that some people dislike the unpleasant side effects, and stop taking the drug cold turkey which is stupid for ANY drug, not just psych. But most people dislike their disease more.
LOL forums. That's a reliable and academic source of information. How about not. Show me a lab report and maybe I'll take you seriously.
Someone taking benzos even exactly as prescribed for long enough, can die from withdrawals if they stop taking them to fast. The withdrawals can last for YEARS.
SSRI and other psych drug withdrawals are very similar. Amphetamines, mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics that cause Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, seizures, coma, death, etc.
The vast majority of the time these drugs never even helped the person with there emotional/behavioral issues.
Withdrawing too quickly from ANY medication can cause death if done too fast. However that is extremely rare.
And your statistics come from where? Because mine come from scientific journals, universities, and valid web resources- they all say that these drugs have been shown to have a statistically significant outcome. Meaning that most of the time they help. Of course there are always exceptions, but these drugs have been tested often enough to have proven their worth.
wow apparently you all haven't interacted with anyone with a serious mental health disorder. I just graduated from medical school and have seen psychiatric intervention work for and help patients. do you think you can treat schizophrenia with exercise? delusional disorders with diet? Electroshock therapy works people and now a days it is done with full consent. But alas think what you will but don't knock psychiatrists and mental health workers, they truly are doing the world a benefit
What you are focusing on is the extreme; the fact that schizophrenia is a disorder isn't reason to defend the entire field of psychiatry. The problem, as shown in the video, is the overdiagnosing of depression and the "medical" treatment of non-medical disorders. Don't think that I have not been exposed to the psychiatric community like you have, I'm well aware of both sides of the field.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't know why schizophernia happens, but I know a person who has that and IT IS serious shit. Still I don't believe in "wrong" chemicals in the brain and all the drugs just make those people "acceptabe", but lot of side effects. There is no cure 4 schizophrenia, that's reality. There are some drugs that makes them "acting like a robot", but it's no cure. Drugs only, no cure. Every honest psychiatrist knows that.
race purity and intelligence seems very similar to this. Based on negative stereotypes and a government agenda then passed as science.
They are so ruthless they even give anti-psychotics to the elderly with Demantia and 1000 die a year.
maybe there is last resort use only for these brain altering toxic metal drugs for a temporary problem. the criteria is to make sales and as many as possible and passing laws to force it, including kids.
CliveGains80s 1 month ago
An Analogy:
There's a place in a large city with very bad drinking water, and kids are always getting sick with dysentery. So you keep treating the dysentery, but meanwhile it would be much better to clean up the drinking water... The drugs work on the dysentery for about 48 hours, but you're NOT treating the problem. And the problem is NOT genetic.
JoeDiehl37 4 months ago
psychiatrists : 'yea let's throw dangerous chemicals into a kettle, mixing them, and serving the crap to kids, calling ourselves docs. that would be great business, because they will get damaged so badly, so that their parents think they might need more meds. oh shit, we're just leprechauns in wheelchairs hallucinating in hell.'
secondbible 5 months ago
I personally think psychiatric drugs help more than hurt.
HilarityBribo 11 months ago
Aderall is the shit fuck tom cruise
chevlyatmac 11 months ago
WIll you fix software corruption problems of your PC by tampering the hardware of the machine?
The problem is that psychiatry tries to deny personal responsibility of people by blaming the chemicals of the brain, "I did't it kill him, it was my brain chemicals than made me did it"; and to create an addiction by looking a quick fix for deep problems rooted in the social unbringing and nutrition of the person; so they can get them hook in it and mane millions
Psychiatry is a PSEUDOSCIENCE
AmaruRuna 1 year ago
I always find this to be one of the most ironic things in the world: Scientology calling something ELSE a pseudo science. lol, what horseshit!
JHDiddles12 1 year ago
@JHDiddles12 Being against Psychiatry as such has nothing to do with Scientology, I am have nothing to do with Scientology for example. I just studied the issue through authors, scientists and philosophers like RD Laing, Thomas Szasz, M. Focault, etc., who represent a legitimate criticism of the domain in question. But I agree with you that by a cult - itself irrational and unscientific - attaching itself to the issue it obfuscates in the eye of the public the legitimate critics as well.
eydos 1 year ago
This psychiatric madness needs to stop. To many young lives are being DESTROYED because of evil psychiatrists and their brain damaging drugs. If we dont act now to stop these KILLERS, HISTORY WILL REPEAT ITSELF. Psychiatrists are the most DANGEROUS, MOST VILE SUBHUMANS a human being shall ever encounter. THIS ADVERT posted in this video is TRUTH. What you all decide on your lives with mind altering psychiatric toxins is your choices. Be warned though: Once you take these drugs its FOR LIFE.
draziom902 1 year ago
psychiatrists are killing our society. the new world order. the holocaust. what keeps psychiatrists in business is its brainwashed pill poppers and people who agree with them. all should burn in hell for eternity for destroying civilization. living a life stoned on drugs your better off killing yourself. psychiatrists laugh, you cry.
draziom902 1 year ago
This is a very nice video. Psychiatrists should be treated like drug dealers in my book.
realscience1 1 year ago
Got to admire Tom Cruise for bringing this into the public domain.
the0fart0machine 1 year ago 2
Psychiatrists make it up as they go along, very similar to evolutionists. Both pseudoscience.
the0fart0machine 1 year ago
Jeremy Perkins was given vitamins...became suspicious and paranoid and ended up stabbing his mother 77 times...end of story
thpriest15 1 year ago
@thpriest15 Jeremy Perkins was a street drug user, taking hits of LSD, marijuana, cocaine etc. He killed his mother under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Psychiatric drugs are now consuming the life of Jeremy Perkins in the mental institution. He is a lifeless shell. Psychiatry KILLS.
draziom902 1 year ago
@draziom902 Alright, I've been seeing a psychiatrist since I was 15. He didn't recommend antidepressants or electroshock treatment or any of that the moment I walked in, we sat down, and talked, and you don't know how beneficial it is, i do now take antidepressants, do they help? I would say they definatley do, does it help for everyone? of course not, but psychiatry is a different experience for EVERYONE, does it have its flaws? of course, but i benefit from psychiatry, and that's what matters
thpriest15 1 year ago
@thpriest15 Thats your choice if you want to be drugged. I wont take that away from you. But i will say this. In time your mind and body will deteriorate and get worse while the psychiatric toxins take its toll. You will crumble at the hands of beedy eyed psychiatrists who lick their chops to take your SOUL.
draziom902 1 year ago
@draziom902 well, it's a risk i'm willing to take. however, if it's a choice between a good psychiatrist, who will readily admit that as a part of his training, he studies both the advantages AND the flaws of his profession, studied it for 5-6 years of his mortal life and readily admits he doesn't have the mind completely mapped out (something that will never happen) to a scientologist, who will arrogantly have me believe that a session a day in a sauna will cure me, well my mind is made up :P
thpriest15 1 year ago
@thpriest15 Enjoy your life. You are aware you wont live past 40. Good luck!. Psychiatry KILLS.
draziom902 1 year ago
@draziom902 you know what that is? that isn't you trying to look out for me, it's you trying to scare me, into irrational fear. it's fear-mongering! well, no thanks!
thpriest15 1 year ago
@thpriest15 I am absolutely NOT trying to scare you or trying to do you harm. I'm 36 years old and i am taking my TIME to warn you on the extreme dangers of psychiatric drugs. And guess what?.. I TOOK them for 18 YEARS and it has damaged my central nervous system permanently. I was your age when i was drugged (I didnt have the choice to say no). I am absolutely not trying to harm you or scare you or do anything wrong to you. I understand you are suffering and i take that into consideration.
draziom902 1 year ago
@thpriest15 When you said you felt i was trying to harm you/scare you you made me feel bad because my intention was to save your LIFE. I am warning you on the EXTREME DANGERS of psychiatric drugs. I dont want you to become a vegetable like me. I understand you are suffering and if you message me i can give you links of ALTERNATIVES that will save your LIFE rather than be drugged with these nasty psychiatric toxins. You're a young teen, I would NEVER HARM YOU. NEVER think that. I am not EVIL.
draziom902 1 year ago
@thpriest15 I wish you all the best in your health. You have the knowledge now of whats happening. The choice you make now is forever. You are still in time to break the chains and become free NOW. OK bro?. I understand you're suffering anxieties, depression, and mental anguish. One of the best methods to cure this is social interaction and counselling. 1-1 counselling (talk therapy) , high end nutrition, good sleep, lots of distraction, and hope. I been through what you feel. I understand.
draziom902 1 year ago
In the late 50's the CIA had a secret brainwash program code naqmed MKUltra. They paid a Psychiatrist Dr Cameron in Montreal to carry it out. He injected LSD mixed with other drugs, Massive electric shocks and weeks of sleep as a brainwash tape played. It was horrific. I am telling my story on You Tube called youkilledyourmother
photo986 2 years ago
@photo986 Sorry to hear you are a victim of the criminal psychiatrists. I hope you sent them to prison. Let the world know about the fraud of psychiatry.
draziom902 1 year ago
Hate to agree with Cruise, but he is right about Psychiatry. Too bad he's a Scientologist, and that ruins his credibility; so he actually did more harm in that interview than good.
pashedmotatos 2 years ago 3
@pashedmotatos Why would you hate to agree with Cruise?. He is right about psychiatry. Why hate to agree with him? Why force the agreement?. Cant think for yourself?
draziom902 1 year ago
ah you again. 4chan beat you to the ground
jungleman68 2 years ago
BAN PSYCHIATRY!
mainestategop 2 years ago 2
funny that scientologists take vitamins which stimulate the body and mind yet are opposed to drugs that alter body and mind hmm...
brydogary 3 years ago
These scientology fronts always talk about "tax dollars" but they dont pay any taxes.
Scientology staff make $50 a week. I guess that is why they are so bitter about money.
kdb955 3 years ago
Let's not confuse the two; psychology does have its downfalls, paricularly in many ways that it's applied, but the two disciplines are very different.
davidjaames 3 years ago
@davidjaames No. You are dead wrong. psychology and psychiatry are EXACTLY the SAME pseudoscience.
draziom902 1 year ago
@davidjaames You are wrong. Psychology is a pseudoscience and a religion of EVIL. This pseudoscience is what psychiatrists study to control and harm naive innocent human beings. Psychology is nothing but social control. It must be eradicated. The history of psychiatry/psychology has left millions of innocent human beings in BODY BAGS. Follow the money trail, follow the evil empire. The house of cards built by psychiatrists shall be CRUSHED to the GROUND. Their time is up.
draziom902 1 year ago
hello. thanks for sharing. just a few questions: a gay is an ill person? Not for me. If the answer was yes, please tell me what kind of illness is? and which is the best treatment for?
TYVM
demondarg 3 years ago
While psychiatry isn't completely junk science, there are certainly a lot of powerful characters in the field of psychiatry that are very suspect, and use psuedoscientific methods to create a legal drug cartel in conjunction with their partners-in-crime in the Pharmacy industry. But it's important that we don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
garybooker 3 years ago
@garybooker Psychiatry is COMPLETE JUNK SCIENCE from A to Z. Nothing more.
draziom902 1 year ago
"chemical imbalance" is pure bullshit; depression is just "u've been kicked in the ass harder than u can take", that's all. There is no chemical imbalance in ur brain as the cause, we're not machines. If u loose ur arm or can't walk, or dying on cancer - there is no chemical shit wrong in the brain, it's the reality that hits u. Of course u can cover that with many drugs, but it doesn't change the reality, u just don't care, couse u're stoned. Antidepressant do 1 thing - make u stoned and fat.
maciondo 3 years ago 8
@maciondo That is a lot of bullshit that sounds like it was shat out in the victorian times,back when the world was flat and if you went too far you would fall off.Chemical imbalances are a reality.Neurotransmitters can be effected by substance misuse,certain illnesses and genetic dispositions.Secondly the majority of anti-depressants do not make you stoned.They merely effect certain chemical aspects of the brain.It's people like you who have fucked up the world in the first place.
kbo300492 4 months ago
@maciondo You've never taken a basic biology class, have you? Because if you had, you'd know how neurotransmitters work. The only reason there are no tests yet is because psychiatry/psychology are emerging sciences. There will be tests in the future, as science advances.
WickedWitchElphaba 4 months ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
No, buddy. Having tests is the definition of science. If you can't test your hypothesis or falsify it, then it isn't science. So how can you claim "there are no tests because they're emerging sciences". Well shit, there are no tests in astrology because it's an emerging science. But later there will be tests. See how this doesn't work? Your comment therefore does not make sense to a scientist.
I thought this was very basic and taught before biology class.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@sk8teh14 By "no tests" I mean there are no diagnostic tests outside of PET scans or psychological evaluations. I do believe it is possible for doctors to measure the amount of neurotransmitters in the brain, but I think those are expensive procedures. Of COURSE there are tests that exist to validate/disprove hypotheses in psychology, they're coming up with them all the time- we tend to call them experiments. They're usually conducted in universities and hospitals.
And don't call me "buddy".
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
But of course, we're not talking about psychology. We are talking about psychiatry which have no tests - whose sole purpose is to pretend that being sad (an observation) is also the same as the explanation (depression). And by tests, I am not as concerned with them being diagnostic. Mainly, they need to confirm a proposed explanation to an observation.
So you have not presented a test, therefore you have said psychiatry is not science.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@sk8teh14 psychiatry takes everything it does from psychology and neuroscience, so to speak of one you must speak of the other.
Also, you overgeneralize. "sadness" =/= depression. Depression is a state of immense hopelessness and despair that simply does not go away no matter what the person tries. It's characterized by a lot more than just "sadness." Don't be ignorant or I'm not going to take you seriously.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba There have been COUNTLESS studies done on illnesses like depression, and countless tests and experiments done. The most common are PET scans of the brain showing the differences in neural activity. Universities also conduct studies on a daily basis, and new research is being published all the time. Seriously, if you want to learn more about it just go to a damn library.
They HAVE confirmed explanations for the observations. It's called the biopsychosocial model. Google it.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
>PET scans
This is not a test. This simply establishes a correlation which is meaningless in science. Your test isn't an explanation, it's an observation - a description. Hence why psychology and psychiatry are called descriptive sciences (aka not science).
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
To put it simply, if I lose sleep, that will likely show up in a PET scan. So will taking cocaine. It doesn't mean the person losing sleep has an illness. That's just an observation - i.e. what a PET scan looks like for someone who loses sleep.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Ultimately, there's no real reason I should have to address a PET scan. When a person walks into a psychiatrist's office, a doctor will have a hypothesis (the person has what I call depression) and that's it. There is no objective test to confirm or falsify his suspicions. So it's not science. We don't need to even address a PET scan. It's an irrelevant subject.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Therefore, it is my suspicion that you see the word "objective test" and go on a random search. "Hey PET test has the word test in it so this must address what this guy is talking about". I can also test the probability that a Pisces has a cat. It doesn't make astrology any more scientific, regardless of the level of sophistication I use to measure that probability.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Sorry for how many replies I have made, but one familiar with science could spend all day ridiculing the number of scientific fallacies you've presented. Ironically, your apparent ignorance of how science works is the perfect epitome for psychiatry.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
"Depression is a state of immense hopelessness and despair that simply does not go away no matter what the person tries."
That's like saying stomach cancer is a state of diarhea and intense stomach pain that does not go away. All I've done is take common symptoms, bunch them together, and stick a label on them. By this definition, someone who ate a bad burrito would also have stomach cancer. This is NOT how science works.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@sk8teh14 I don't believe you are qualified to call me ignorant on the subject of psychology, considering I study it in school. It IS a science, considering it uses the scientific method in ALL of it's experiments. I'm not particularly interested to disecting your entire slew of comments, but I believe you missed my point. You clearly have done very little reading from objective sources- i.e., university studies and scientific journals, about psychological illnesses.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba Otherwise, you would not hold the opinion that psychological studies are not "real science," nor would you deny the existence of mental illnesses. I'm willing to bet the things you read are from biased anti-psychiatry websites. A social science is still a science. You elitist "hard scientists" annoy the piss out of me. Perhaps PET scans were not the best example to use in my argument, but nonetheless you cannot deny that psychological studies ARE scientific studies.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba Also I did not describe depression in it's entirety, as the full definition and diagnostic critieria are much longer. You can find the full DSM definition online at any reputable website. The fact that you are even arguing that point with me shows your own ignorance.
Yes, diseases of the mind are a bit trickier- but you forget that the mind and the brain are one and the same. Every thought in our head is controlled by tiny neurons and their activity.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba To speak of one is to speak of the other. You simply cannot deny the physciality of psychological illnesses- to do so is to deny the existence of you brain.
Unless you want to start arguing "souls", but such discussions do not belong in science.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
>souls discussions do not belong in science
I agree. Saying for example that someone is possessed because they are seizing gets us no where. I don't suppose you bothered to ever ponder *why* we don't accept this in science. Because I'm defining the observation by the symptom. It's like saying species evolve because of evolve force. It gets us nowhere. Just like saying people are sad because of sad-syndrome - or well..depression.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
>Depression in the DSM
It doesn't matter whether you described it in its entirety or not. Depression is defined by observations. This is not how science works. I do not test a person for cancer by asking them if they have stomach pain. Many explanations lead to this observation.
>forget that the mind and the brain
I do? When did I even mention the mind or the brain? You're beginning to ramble.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
>ignorant
I didn't call you ignorant of psychology or psychiatry. I called you ignorant of science. You don't seem very rigorous in addressing my points. Those two statements are vastly different.
>Scientific method in all its experiments
Not in diagnosing people, not in anything listed in the DSM. As I mentioned, a "mental illness" is just symptoms grouped together
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Interestingly enough, this is the first step in the scientific method (observation). The next step is a hypothesis as to the explanation. But since mental illness is not very well defined and best defined by the observation itself, this step has yet to have been taken in the field of psychiatry. So saying they use the scientific method could not be more wrong as they have only progressed through the first step.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@sk8teh14 You're correct in that I'm not feeling very rigorous in arguing with you. I am tired and don't particularly feel well and I'm quite done with this whole thing.
All I know is that every single psychology journal I have ever read has used the scientific method all the way through- from observation to experimentation/conclusions. It's difficult for psychiatry to thoroughly prove the physical explanations for mental illnesses because it IS an emerging science and technology is limited.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba However, what we DO know is that these illnesses are real problems- and many treatments have shown themselves, in practice to be successful. I have no doubt that in the future mental illnesses will be diagnosed via physical tests, and I have no doubt that soon we will have that hard medical evidence you're looking for. We're close to discovering the biological causes, and technology is getting more and more advanced. Most of the medical community is on my side here.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Yeah I'm sure you will find hard evidence for sibling rivalry disorder and mathematics disorder. I don't really think this is even worth arguing about. I really have trouble understanding how people can take this seriously. But it should be fought. Everywhere you go, you see another article telling us that depression is real and medication is the answer. You also see ads for Cymbalta right next to it. But I'm sure that's a coincidence and not a dark motive.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@sk8teh14 Slippery slope logical fallacy. Invalid argument.
And what, pray tell, is wrong with people seeking treatment for their problems? Yes, the medications have side effects. ALL medications have side effects. It doesn't mean the drug companies are out to "get us". It means the medical community is developing new medications to treat illnesses that are being recognized as having neurological roots.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
I don't understand how you take this anti-psychiatry garbage seriously. You're nothing but a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Antipsychiatry is an inappropriate word. Psychiatry has never been established to begin with. You agree with me on every point I make. You admit depression (and every mental illness) is defined by the symptoms - which is not how science works. You admit that the PET scan is not valid for establishing psychiatry as science. You admit there are no objective tests. Only in summary can you wash over the topic and pretend you won the argument.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
But when it comes to rigorously addressing specific points, you've failed and agreed with me on every one. We have yet to even get into the more ridiculous aspects of psychiatry - such as mathematics disorder, sibling rivalry disorder, etc being listed as mental illnesses. The fact that homosexuality used to be listed as a mental illness. The fact that the last 100 illnesses were "discovered" within a 7 year timespan.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
But I don't need to ridicule psychiatry to demonstrate that it is not science. The field does not have to be ridiculous (read: bullshit) for it to not be science. It just happens that psychiatry is not science and is also very ridiculous.
Antipsych isn't to be taken seriously. Because psychiatry has not established itself as a plausible field let alone a scientific field. It's psychiatry's job to establish itself. Antipsych is simply the null hypothesis/default position.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
"And what is wrong with people seeking treatment for their problems"
Because it is not based in science as you have freely admitted throughout this discussion. There is no objective test. In fact, the illness is not even a valid hypothesis - it's just defined by the symptoms which is circular reasoning.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
I'm not really here to tell you it's wrong to seek help from pseudoscience. I'm here to establish that it is indeed pseudoscience. Something you are agreeing with me on because you admit there are no objective tests.
If you want my opinion on why it's wrong, it's wrong because consumers in general are ignorant of what goes into what they are consuming. I do not know how to set up a cell phone site but I have a cell phone
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
I do not know how to safely pasteurize milk, but I enjoy drinking milk. This is the nature of a specialist economy. We can trust the person specializing in what they do are doing it right. Psychiatry isn't doing it right but they give no indication of this to anyone walking into their office. It deceives people into believing there is legitimate science behind what they are taking, and this is simply not true. Thus the moral dilemma becomes apparent.
sk8teh14 1 month ago
@sk8teh14 The only moral dilemna I see is that you discourage people from getting help they likely desparately need. I'm sorry, but I fail to see how you cannot believe that mental illnesses are not real. We DO have tests for this illnesses that exist on a psychological level- tons of them. Just because you cannot physically test the brain does not mean that a doctor cannot test for these illnesses. Every valid psychological test in existence is empirically derived.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba I do not agree that psychiatry is a pseudoscience. I agree that it is an EMERGING science, which, you may recall, ALL sciences were at one point. At one point, biology was looking at the earth and coming up with hypotheses based solely on observations. But biology has evolved, and psychiatry is and will continue to do so. At one point, there were thousands of incorrect biological theories, to draw comparison to your homosexuality point. Psychiatry is changing.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba And it will continue to do so until we get to the point where there WILL be better tests for mental illnesses.
I think what you fail to understand is that just because a science is emerging, doesn't mean it isn't a science and it doesn't meant that it doesn't use the scientific method. There's a LOT we don't understand about the human brain. But we have discovered many correlations between different chemical levels, the PET scans, and the sympotms of mental illnessses.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba Now, I know that correlations does not always equal causation, but these correlational studies will be the root of what neuroscience and psychology eventually will be able to do with the human brain.
You see, the problem with being a null hypothesis is that we never accept the null- instead we keep studying and experimenting and learning to we are able to reject it. Or have you never taken a basic statistics class?
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba In the end, the problem with people like you who deny psychiatry as anything valid is that it stops people from seeking treatments, and that is interfering with their lives and happiness.
People CANNOT just "snap out of" a mental illness- it cannot be done. They need help, sometimes through therapy, sometimes through drugs. and if the drugs help them, then I see no harm. ALL doctors who prescribe medication are obligated to inform their patients of the possible side effects
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba And all doctors do. At the end of the day it is the patient's, or the person responsible for the patient's decision of whether or not to take the medications. And this anti-psychiatry stuff can scare people away from doing that. The medications rarely harm people- in fact, they do more good than harm, as MANY studies have shown. Yes, antidepressants can in rare cases increase suicidal thoughts, but overall they are beneficent drugs. I used to be on Prozac, and it got me to
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba a point where I was actually able to ween myself off of it. The drugs are NOT addictive, they do NOT do any physical harm to the body, and they DO help- and psychiatry has been able to show why. Anybody who doubts this has very little understanding of neurons and neurotransmitters.
And again, as these fields change and evolve the drugs will become more stream-lined and have less of the unpleasant side effects.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba I simply see no reason for you to be so against this sort of research. Anything that leads to an expansion of knowledge and new understanding can only be a good thing. Even the Ancient Greeks were aware of that.
WickedWitchElphaba 1 month ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Benzo withdrawals are worse then any opiates withdrawals, I can show you ex heroin addicts saying they would rather go through heroin withdrawals 100 more times rather then go through benzo withdrawals again.
Most psych drug have HORRIBLE withdrawals, psychiatric drugs can cause permanent physical damage, the fact that you are denying this infuriates me. Psych drugs KILL people, they are VERY harmful, you uneducated piece of shit.
JenkemBOMBS 4 days ago
@JenkemBOMBS Yeah, I'm the uneducated one. That's why I'm currently enrolled at a university.
ALL withdrawals are horrible if done incorrectly. If the drug is weaned off of slowly symptoms won't be nearly as bad.
I think you are over-reacting. I've met plently of people who have been/are on psych drugs. All of them are still alive and well. Most say the drugs helped/help them.
The fact that you encourage people not to seek treatment for their illnesses infuriates me, so I guess we're even.
WickedWitchElphaba 4 days ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
The fact that you think psychiatric illnesses are neurological diseases infuriates me.
The fact that you want people to take extremely harmful/addictive drugs for emotional/behavioral issues infuriates me.
The fact that you downplay how much some psych drugs have ruined peoples lives, even thought they took them as prescribed...
They're are entire forums dedicated to people talking about there psych drug withdrawal, go peddle your bullshit to them.
JenkemBOMBS 3 days ago
@JenkemBOMBS Dude, everything you THINK is neurological. No neurons- no thinking. To deny that mental illnesses are neurological is to deny that you have a brain in the first place.
I'm not saying the drugs are the only solution. But sometimes they are when therapy has not worked. Drugs should be something of a last resort.
WickedWitchElphaba 3 days ago
@WickedWitchElphaba I've never heard of a single person whose life has been "ruined" by a psych drug. I've read that some people dislike the unpleasant side effects, and stop taking the drug cold turkey which is stupid for ANY drug, not just psych. But most people dislike their disease more.
LOL forums. That's a reliable and academic source of information. How about not. Show me a lab report and maybe I'll take you seriously.
WickedWitchElphaba 3 days ago
@WickedWitchElphaba
Someone taking benzos even exactly as prescribed for long enough, can die from withdrawals if they stop taking them to fast. The withdrawals can last for YEARS.
SSRI and other psych drug withdrawals are very similar. Amphetamines, mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics that cause Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, seizures, coma, death, etc.
The vast majority of the time these drugs never even helped the person with there emotional/behavioral issues.
JenkemBOMBS 4 days ago
@JenkemBOMBS Oy.
Withdrawing too quickly from ANY medication can cause death if done too fast. However that is extremely rare.
And your statistics come from where? Because mine come from scientific journals, universities, and valid web resources- they all say that these drugs have been shown to have a statistically significant outcome. Meaning that most of the time they help. Of course there are always exceptions, but these drugs have been tested often enough to have proven their worth.
WickedWitchElphaba 4 days ago
wow apparently you all haven't interacted with anyone with a serious mental health disorder. I just graduated from medical school and have seen psychiatric intervention work for and help patients. do you think you can treat schizophrenia with exercise? delusional disorders with diet? Electroshock therapy works people and now a days it is done with full consent. But alas think what you will but don't knock psychiatrists and mental health workers, they truly are doing the world a benefit
guitarro5 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What you are focusing on is the extreme; the fact that schizophrenia is a disorder isn't reason to defend the entire field of psychiatry. The problem, as shown in the video, is the overdiagnosing of depression and the "medical" treatment of non-medical disorders. Don't think that I have not been exposed to the psychiatric community like you have, I'm well aware of both sides of the field.
davidjaames 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't know why schizophernia happens, but I know a person who has that and IT IS serious shit. Still I don't believe in "wrong" chemicals in the brain and all the drugs just make those people "acceptabe", but lot of side effects. There is no cure 4 schizophrenia, that's reality. There are some drugs that makes them "acting like a robot", but it's no cure. Drugs only, no cure. Every honest psychiatrist knows that.
maciondo 3 years ago
Simple, to the point, and honest. Good video.
trailblazer1971 3 years ago 4