I think they were being a bit biased or just a bit rude towards Crystal in this episode. At times, it seemed like he was being ridiculed. :\ still, great program and I totally agree with the theory. I don't think any language is ever going to deteriorate, I think it will just keep evolving. I'm sure the way English or some languages are spoken, written, pronounced, presented is a little or has changed greatly from centuries ago.
He's too optimistic. Sure, most of the words in text messages are spelled correctly, but that's a deceitful statement; I imagine most of the words he's referring to are basic, foundational words (e.g. the, what, your, you're)
Thanks for uploading that. I'd been talking about David Crystal on a forum and I said I didn't know what he looked like in person. But I found this clip and realised I'd seen it when it was first on. I knew him all along!
I believe that language is dynamic. We cannot stop the rapid development of language. Technology has a great role to play in recent development. What we can do is to understand and accept these changes.
@tgringe Yeah you can think like that. I was telling that British people should protect their language and not do the same destruction as other people...you are 17 and still your brain is small...
I love this show, it appealse to so many with its wide rage of subjects and usually eccentric personalities. Reg and Andy mkae an awsome team anyone would like.
Excuse me while I go get my friends hooked on this show.
whats in intresting is the dissenter was on about 'loss of adverbs' etc. But language is about communication, if you don't need adverbs to make your point why use them? Language surely has to be adaptive like science is. I personally think word limits of youtube and twitter etc does help expression: I usually have to edit my words down and that makes me think about what i really want to say, and as Crystal says, practice improves use of language.
This is an appalling concept for a show. Who in the BBC thought this could possibly be a good idea? You test a theory by using it to make predictions, and then doing experiments or checking evidence and comparing outcomes, not by having it voted on by a panel of 3 clueless nobodies. This view of science only encourages the idiots (homeopaths, creationists, climate denialists, scientologists, &c. &c..)
@FugalQuease I appreciate your very good point: science can only be judged by scientists, but this programme is not a scientific forum, its a public forum with the added purpose of entertainment.. But i think it is a great programme, because it is very revealing about the public understanding of science and attitude to cutting research (as the audience also votes by laughing etc). I saw one programme recently i will discuss with you if you like as per the above point. (feel free to mail me).
@goodbyelonglive44 It is completely relative. In one hundred years people could think the way you just wrote is poetic. He spoke as they did at the time. Beauty in language is completely subjective.
@astudyofeverything No way its not relative. The language is changed by the way educated people talk. Do you know why language isnt like Shakesphear? Because most educated people in industrial revolution wrote books in simple english so people could understand technical matter but still they didnt make it so simple that they destroyed the beauty of reading. The world is ruled by people who find cures for deceases, natioanlists, and nuclear weapons..and the language that write its mannuals.
@goodbyelonglive44 I still don't see the point you are trying to make here. How is this supporting your original assertion that texting is *destroying the beauty of language*.
Texting is done by people who have time to think of the world in fancy ways, not busy intellectuals. people who want politics and science interests have to speak and write big books in a formal language for it to sound intellectual.Those days in Shakesphears time, language was not industrial, so it changed..but current language is constant and wont change.
@goodbyelonglive44 The only languages that are constant and won't change are dead languages. Like with animals , the only way to stop evolution is to kill off the species.
@goodbyelonglive44 I'm sorry...the statement that "current language is constant and wont [sic] change," and I assume you are referring to your native language, English, is absurd and would get you laughed out of an introductory linguistics course.
@goodbyelonglive44 I have no idea what you meant by that comment. Utter communication fail. Pretty ironic considering... I was merely pointing out that anybody who claims that languages "constant and wont [sic] change," knows nothing about language...which I guess you just reinforced with your comment.
@sleepcity Well languages change...thats true, but it is not about weather languages change or not, but what matters is how it is changed and by whom...after Industrial revolution, people could no longer write "beautiful literature" because instructions on those machine mannuals had to be clear...so language was changed by engineers and the labourers...but now its being changed by some teenagers and hollywood movie stars
@goodbyelonglive44 Um...okay. Conversation over. This is fruitless bullshit. You know nothing about language, literature, engineers, laborers, teenagers, or movie stars. How's that? Have a good one.
@sleepcity HOW DO YOU KNOW I KNOW NOTHING ASSHOLE? I KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO...JUST BECAUSE YOU SHOW OFF YOURSELF AS AN INTELLECTUAL, I KNOW YOU ARE A SKUNK WITH NO TALENT
@goodbyelonglive44 Want to try that again? A skunk? Really? This is getting surreal. I feel like we're in an Albee play. Let's keep it going, okay? Your turn again!
@goodbyelonglive44 Language isn't like Shakespear because standardised spelling wasn't introduced until after Shakespear's time! It still isn't 100% standardised. I'm only replying to this comment instead of the rest of your circular argumants because this pissed me off the most. If you're going to argue a point do some fucking research. You only have one argument about mannuals. Why don't you try watching the video before commenting, maybe you'll learn something.
@DrasticDreamer5 Do some fucking reaserach? yeah like people got time t research about the obvious...txting is bad and it is not right for people to use language too easily...
But anyways it doesnt matter actually now..You know why? because in 21st century, idiots acn be the idiots and not still die..so you keep on texting and then you wont have patience to read a good book..and you carry it in your genes and so on..until one day you have spreaded a decease in to your whole neighborhood..
@goodbyelonglive44 LMAO I never knew texting was genetic! How could I ever have insulted you, you're obviously a genius! All research done in to texting points to the fact that it is good for the English Language. And actually I do read books, I read a lot of books, not only am I a Language student, I'm also a Literature student. Your argument is null and void anyway because even though you're arguing a prescriptivist point of you can't actually use standard spelling and sentence structure.
@DrasticDreamer5 Language student.?.. nice try So is my friend and even he thinks that texting with fancy words is bad for language...If it was good why isn't Queen in England talking in that language? Well I have heard her speaking, she is talking like she is going to explode a load of lies under hot sun my god, but still she tries to use the little good english she knows as much as possible rather than "LOL LOL"
@goodbyelonglive44 Okay then, I'm a Language student who understands Language. Also, don't generalise us using someone who was brought up to speak like that and is fucking German. If you're going to argue about this learn to use "standard" English and get a clue. You've obviously coming up with any random crap that sounds like it could be to do with this. "They're talking about English...erm...er...The Queen! Aha, she has a vague connection to this. My argument is now fool proof!"
Look here..the Texting language will change English in a negative way..it will destroy peoples ability to make complex sentenses and so on..the language that is writtern on books is good enough and does not have to change..
@goodbyelonglive44 Do you a single bit of evidence to suggest that people who text can't write books in standard English? People need to write complex sentences in books. The only reason why text messages are short are bcos they need to be short. Language is changed by different needs, different mediums. Until English doesnt need complex sentences, texting can't do anything to it.
@theJrLinguist huh..fucking teenagers making the world pathotic with thier texting and chatting Lol LOl LMAO stuff...and later these people wil join the army and would make everyone speak like them
Read some of David Crystal's books; they're excellent! I especially recommend How Language Works - more like a reference book than a front to back book, and great to have at your disposal.
kids today dont know how to spell maybe the first texters did but now kids just know the already shortened words, they dont know how to spell the whole thing! I know afew of them!
I didn't like how the judges mocked Crystal. Even thoyygh he was 'laughing with them', really, the joke was on him and he definitely doesn't derserve to be laughed at such a proffesional level when he holds so many valid points.
@alexxandria The trouble is - because texting is such a universal phenomena, everyone things they are an expert. I bet you don't get quips like this when a quantum physicist is talking. Because it is language and everyone can identify with it - the requirement for years of study to make a well thought out argument isn't at all appreciated. David Crystal is THE foremost expert on the English language - ok panellists, make a few comments but when he responds, actually think about what he said.
@alexxandria don't worry, scientists (i count lingists as scientists because they have to be rigorous?) - thrive on being mocked, and notice none of the mocking was credible or suppored by anything as objective as what Crystal was presenting; from that point of view the mocking was as effective as using a piece of tissue paper to stop a bullet.
One counterargument might be the Cingular commercial, "IDK my BFF Jill?" that reflects a real culture of kids speaking this way. I even had a student write "IDK" on an exam once.
Also, in addition to the point brought up in 1:52, I would wonder what David Crystal's thoughts are on the relatively new phenomenon of Twitter.
Comment removed
mcconvilleme 1 month ago
I think they were being a bit biased or just a bit rude towards Crystal in this episode. At times, it seemed like he was being ridiculed. :\ still, great program and I totally agree with the theory. I don't think any language is ever going to deteriorate, I think it will just keep evolving. I'm sure the way English or some languages are spoken, written, pronounced, presented is a little or has changed greatly from centuries ago.
vaietehQ 2 months ago
He's too optimistic. Sure, most of the words in text messages are spelled correctly, but that's a deceitful statement; I imagine most of the words he's referring to are basic, foundational words (e.g. the, what, your, you're)
Wolfovicz 3 months ago
What a lovely man.
doniskahn 4 months ago
of crse, txt 5pk int were it strtd innit? h4xxorz wer uz1n 1337 5pk y34rz b4 kidz got4 holda fones newai
monoham1 5 months ago
Thanks for uploading that. I'd been talking about David Crystal on a forum and I said I didn't know what he looked like in person. But I found this clip and realised I'd seen it when it was first on. I knew him all along!
bodnotbod 6 months ago
I dont think i would actually mind sitting through one of his lectures
jert4lyfff 7 months ago
it's rare to find a video without a single dislike
13mewtwo 7 months ago
David = <3
Flisssssy 7 months ago
It's sad that these types of shows are restricted to BBC4. This should be at least BBC2.
adam4757 9 months ago
LAD.
gulpytheslasher 10 months ago
GO DAVID CRYSTAL! YOU ARE MAJOR MAJOR RIGHT! :)
ria346 1 year ago
I believe that language is dynamic. We cannot stop the rapid development of language. Technology has a great role to play in recent development. What we can do is to understand and accept these changes.
cesgarc 1 year ago
Crystal really knows his onions!
GRJones92hk 1 year ago 2
I’m convinced those most censorious about texting are those who don’t have the intelligence to understand or create it.
Sqid101 1 year ago 3
To all those fundamentalist prescriptivist nincompoops who say language doesn't change.
˄ urs 2 =:-)z
Sqid101 1 year ago
shut up you cunts
MrMongolWolf 1 year ago
@tgringe I use non-standard english?
woww in comparision then you must be using high standard high caste royal english then..
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@tgringe Yeah you can think like that. I was telling that British people should protect their language and not do the same destruction as other people...you are 17 and still your brain is small...
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
My Language teacher showed this video to us and I have no ordered two of his books :D
DrasticDreamer5 1 year ago
@DrasticDreamer5 *now
DrasticDreamer5 1 year ago
My goodness, we'll have to read his books to pass the course .. Good to know he actually exists ..
lilfoo123 1 year ago
I love this show, it appealse to so many with its wide rage of subjects and usually eccentric personalities. Reg and Andy mkae an awsome team anyone would like.
Excuse me while I go get my friends hooked on this show.
Looshkinbighead 1 year ago
whats in intresting is the dissenter was on about 'loss of adverbs' etc. But language is about communication, if you don't need adverbs to make your point why use them? Language surely has to be adaptive like science is. I personally think word limits of youtube and twitter etc does help expression: I usually have to edit my words down and that makes me think about what i really want to say, and as Crystal says, practice improves use of language.
intermender 1 year ago
Lnk d b82rez 2g4
anorman93 1 year ago
This is an appalling concept for a show. Who in the BBC thought this could possibly be a good idea? You test a theory by using it to make predictions, and then doing experiments or checking evidence and comparing outcomes, not by having it voted on by a panel of 3 clueless nobodies. This view of science only encourages the idiots (homeopaths, creationists, climate denialists, scientologists, &c. &c..)
FugalQuease 1 year ago
@FugalQuease I appreciate your very good point: science can only be judged by scientists, but this programme is not a scientific forum, its a public forum with the added purpose of entertainment.. But i think it is a great programme, because it is very revealing about the public understanding of science and attitude to cutting research (as the audience also votes by laughing etc). I saw one programme recently i will discuss with you if you like as per the above point. (feel free to mail me).
intermender 1 year ago
emotion*
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
I do like David Crystal. I do not like how the two comics treated him. Nor do I like the Daily Mail.
plarkmoby 1 year ago 2
David Crystal is THE MAN!!
tonydeziel 1 year ago
texing destroys beauty of the language
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
Comment removed
astudyofeverything 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Beauty of language - by what measure are you using?
astudyofeverything 1 year ago
@astudyofeverything The ability of a language to make war, to make the most impossible eotions appear at the most impossible time..
If Winston Churchil spoke like this:
Hey Yo... hey Dude...the Nazis are kicking our asses..
you would be as well extinct..
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 It is completely relative. In one hundred years people could think the way you just wrote is poetic. He spoke as they did at the time. Beauty in language is completely subjective.
astudyofeverything 1 year ago
@astudyofeverything No way its not relative. The language is changed by the way educated people talk. Do you know why language isnt like Shakesphear? Because most educated people in industrial revolution wrote books in simple english so people could understand technical matter but still they didnt make it so simple that they destroyed the beauty of reading. The world is ruled by people who find cures for deceases, natioanlists, and nuclear weapons..and the language that write its mannuals.
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 I still don't see the point you are trying to make here. How is this supporting your original assertion that texting is *destroying the beauty of language*.
astudyofeverything 1 year ago
@astudyofeverything
Texting is done by people who have time to think of the world in fancy ways, not busy intellectuals. people who want politics and science interests have to speak and write big books in a formal language for it to sound intellectual.Those days in Shakesphears time, language was not industrial, so it changed..but current language is constant and wont change.
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 The only languages that are constant and won't change are dead languages. Like with animals , the only way to stop evolution is to kill off the species.
Gassalasca2 1 year ago 10
@Gassalasca2
"The only languages that are constant and won't change are dead languages." -Except French.
mediumdensityfibre1 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 I'm sorry...the statement that "current language is constant and wont [sic] change," and I assume you are referring to your native language, English, is absurd and would get you laughed out of an introductory linguistics course.
sleepcity 1 year ago
Comment removed
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 I have no idea what you meant by that comment. Utter communication fail. Pretty ironic considering... I was merely pointing out that anybody who claims that languages "constant and wont [sic] change," knows nothing about language...which I guess you just reinforced with your comment.
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepcity Well languages change...thats true, but it is not about weather languages change or not, but what matters is how it is changed and by whom...after Industrial revolution, people could no longer write "beautiful literature" because instructions on those machine mannuals had to be clear...so language was changed by engineers and the labourers...but now its being changed by some teenagers and hollywood movie stars
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Um...okay. Conversation over. This is fruitless bullshit. You know nothing about language, literature, engineers, laborers, teenagers, or movie stars. How's that? Have a good one.
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepcity Nor do you know how to distinguish "whether" from "weather".
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepcity HOW DO YOU KNOW I KNOW NOTHING ASSHOLE? I KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO...JUST BECAUSE YOU SHOW OFF YOURSELF AS AN INTELLECTUAL, I KNOW YOU ARE A SKUNK WITH NO TALENT
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Want to try that again? A skunk? Really? This is getting surreal. I feel like we're in an Albee play. Let's keep it going, okay? Your turn again!
sleepcity 1 year ago
@sleepcity well I will be cleverer than you are....
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Language isn't like Shakespear because standardised spelling wasn't introduced until after Shakespear's time! It still isn't 100% standardised. I'm only replying to this comment instead of the rest of your circular argumants because this pissed me off the most. If you're going to argue a point do some fucking research. You only have one argument about mannuals. Why don't you try watching the video before commenting, maybe you'll learn something.
DrasticDreamer5 1 year ago
@DrasticDreamer5 Do some fucking reaserach? yeah like people got time t research about the obvious...txting is bad and it is not right for people to use language too easily...
But anyways it doesnt matter actually now..You know why? because in 21st century, idiots acn be the idiots and not still die..so you keep on texting and then you wont have patience to read a good book..and you carry it in your genes and so on..until one day you have spreaded a decease in to your whole neighborhood..
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 LMAO I never knew texting was genetic! How could I ever have insulted you, you're obviously a genius! All research done in to texting points to the fact that it is good for the English Language. And actually I do read books, I read a lot of books, not only am I a Language student, I'm also a Literature student. Your argument is null and void anyway because even though you're arguing a prescriptivist point of you can't actually use standard spelling and sentence structure.
DrasticDreamer5 1 year ago
@DrasticDreamer5 Language student.?.. nice try So is my friend and even he thinks that texting with fancy words is bad for language...If it was good why isn't Queen in England talking in that language? Well I have heard her speaking, she is talking like she is going to explode a load of lies under hot sun my god, but still she tries to use the little good english she knows as much as possible rather than "LOL LOL"
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Okay then, I'm a Language student who understands Language. Also, don't generalise us using someone who was brought up to speak like that and is fucking German. If you're going to argue about this learn to use "standard" English and get a clue. You've obviously coming up with any random crap that sounds like it could be to do with this. "They're talking about English...erm...er...The Queen! Aha, she has a vague connection to this. My argument is now fool proof!"
DrasticDreamer5 1 year ago
@DrasticDreamer5 who is German?
Look here..the Texting language will change English in a negative way..it will destroy peoples ability to make complex sentenses and so on..the language that is writtern on books is good enough and does not have to change..
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Do you a single bit of evidence to suggest that people who text can't write books in standard English? People need to write complex sentences in books. The only reason why text messages are short are bcos they need to be short. Language is changed by different needs, different mediums. Until English doesnt need complex sentences, texting can't do anything to it.
theJrLinguist 1 year ago
@theJrLinguist huh..fucking teenagers making the world pathotic with thier texting and chatting Lol LOl LMAO stuff...and later these people wil join the army and would make everyone speak like them
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Nobody would speak like that in those circumstances. You choose your language to suit the circumstance.
digispaces 1 year ago
That black guy is pretty rude and he can't even speak English.
sniperexx 1 year ago
good for bank of england
ask him he will be agree there is no such an entity as meaning anyways
but people need meaning for life to have a world view
if social contract they made requires them to be an android to repalced by choosen ones wellllllll let them use sign language but pay for the schools
artregeous 1 year ago
Wow he's a great debater :D
123Shazzam123 1 year ago
Read some of David Crystal's books; they're excellent! I especially recommend How Language Works - more like a reference book than a front to back book, and great to have at your disposal.
UppruniTegundanna 1 year ago
The black guy is being a dickhead to Crystal when he doesn't deserve it
adnlloyd1 1 year ago
@adnlloyd1 hes just joking around... chill.
squirebuffy 1 year ago
He presented his theory really well. Really like Reg... going to see him in june!
KerrianneCox 1 year ago
kids today dont know how to spell maybe the first texters did but now kids just know the already shortened words, they dont know how to spell the whole thing! I know afew of them!
Victoriam4074 1 year ago
Reg is great on this programme.
NMtB4ev4 1 year ago 6
David Crystal is a genius!
Yithmas 1 year ago 3
David used to be my neighbour untill I moved away from Bangor. I can't believe hes on TV, thats so cool :D.
debrucey 1 year ago
god i admire him!
love him to death.,
this is like a thesis defense! XD
mikmarilynmusika 1 year ago
You have to admire how well he presents his views, and how passionate he is about them, which is amazing.
xNeverthought 1 year ago
I luv dat Crstl!
hes gr8. best lngst 2day
LebiHarms 2 years ago 39
@LebiHarms lmaooo
sniperexx 1 year ago
I didn't like how the judges mocked Crystal. Even thoyygh he was 'laughing with them', really, the joke was on him and he definitely doesn't derserve to be laughed at such a proffesional level when he holds so many valid points.
GO CRYSTAL.
alexxandria 2 years ago 60
@alexxandria The trouble is - because texting is such a universal phenomena, everyone things they are an expert. I bet you don't get quips like this when a quantum physicist is talking. Because it is language and everyone can identify with it - the requirement for years of study to make a well thought out argument isn't at all appreciated. David Crystal is THE foremost expert on the English language - ok panellists, make a few comments but when he responds, actually think about what he said.
astudyofeverything 1 year ago
@alexxandria don't worry, scientists (i count lingists as scientists because they have to be rigorous?) - thrive on being mocked, and notice none of the mocking was credible or suppored by anything as objective as what Crystal was presenting; from that point of view the mocking was as effective as using a piece of tissue paper to stop a bullet.
intermender 1 year ago
@alexxandria If you can't laugh at yourself...
PuppetsNStuff 10 months ago
He is 100% right.
I think that the kids texting each other is a good thing, even if they are using abbreviations. Its all practice in the end.
jiggymafis 2 years ago
One counterargument might be the Cingular commercial, "IDK my BFF Jill?" that reflects a real culture of kids speaking this way. I even had a student write "IDK" on an exam once.
Also, in addition to the point brought up in 1:52, I would wonder what David Crystal's thoughts are on the relatively new phenomenon of Twitter.
zataradeluged 2 years ago
Mr. Crystal made some really good points..
I love the judges reactions to him too
they were hilarious :-p
aguaazul89 2 years ago
Great video
NMtB4ev4 2 years ago
Love this show...
Kill3rKin3 2 years ago
Hard to argue against him, especially since he's a professional! ^^
pallers23 2 years ago 3
i admire him!!
ALIZINNIA 2 years ago 3