As an American, I'm as constitutionally republican as peter. The only reason people liked the royal wedding is because it was a spectacle. We think shiny things are really cool. If you got rid of the queen, we'd find other shiny things to occupy ourselves. My personal perspective is that my great great great great grandfather didn't die in the mud so that his descendants could swoon over the royal family. But there is a question of what's politically possible, isn't there? What say you, Scots?
Alex talks hypocritical shit. He KNOWS why he needs to keep the monarchy but he's just not telling the scottish people the truth. He should have his arse kicked out of this country. Secondly, he felt justified in his challenge to authority did he? It would have to be said (though he would refuse to acknowledge it being the little prat he is) that anyone would RIGHTLY be pissed off at being PUNISHED by "authority" for challenging that "authority". He's illegitimate and a liar.
@Earthlinggb Neither the Scots nor the Britons NEED the monarchy. It is imposed upon us and most are brainwashed to like the Queen etc by the state broadcasting (BBC etc) endlessly promoting the royals.
Salmond should certainly have his arsed kicked out of Bute House and the Scottish government but we should leave the Scottish voters to kick him out of the Scottish parliament which republican broadcasting could encourage.
It is the Queen's arse which needs to be kicked out of this country.
@Earthlinggb You are invited to discuss Salmond's treachery etc in the For Freedom Forums, for robust political debate, inspired by Scots, open to all at FIGH.TK
@cameranzo1 I think the Queen will win and the Scots will lose for the simple reason that the elections will be rigged by the kingdom's control of broadcasting which will only allow those loyal to the Queen on TV to any great extent.
The Queen will certainly win if the SNP win because the SNP under Salmond have a unionist policy of keeping Scotland subjugated under the union crown, united kingdoms and retaining the Queen as head of state.
Unless the Queen dies 1st then King Charles'll win
@cameranzo1 Therefore although free and fair elections would be "Scottish" elections, because the elections are going to be rigged against the Scots the rigged elections will actually be "anti-Scottish" not "Scottish".
@wo0fuk I am Peter Dow, ScottishRepublican, the guy asking the question in this radio phone-in programme and "everyone in Scotland" is not as aggressive as I am, neither are the two Queen's Scottie lap dogs, Salmond and Robertson, speaking in this video.
The "UK" means the kingdom, not us, not all of the people. The UK is a state, ruled by few not the many.
The UK & crown keeps us together only in chains and subjugation, we would be stronger breaking free to come to each other's aid.
Englishjustice66 - Well I will vote "YES" for independence of course but
(a) if we vote "YES" they''ll try to deny us independence by insisting on Queen Elizabeth and the Union of the Crowns - with no republic and no president there'll be NO independence.
(b) if Scots vote "NO" I won't accept slavery under the United Kingdom, rejecting nonsense about a "once in a generation vote".
(c) The republican army should REMOVE/KILL the Queen if she comes to Scotland NOW & WHATEVER the vote.
If the snp can bring the ref, and we get part independence then we can go for fully seprate state.. let salmond play his wee game then hel see what needs done..
spr65 - The SNP have left the referendum to Salmond who has accepted the UK civil servants' plan for a referendum which DENIES Scottish national independence and instead authorises an "independent" Queen's Scottish state to oppress or murder any free Scot.
Salmond's wee game is a state under his authority which will eliminate his political opposition including YOU if he needs to.
Do you want to be enslaved or exterminated by royalist fascists?
Describing Salmond, of all people, as "royalist fascist" sounds a bit head-up-arse. Salmond is acquiescent to royalty, because his priority is Scottish separation, and wants to draw support from royalists and republicans alike. If Salmond is a fascist, then all I can say is that almost all world politicians are fascists and the word loses all meaning.
inkstersco - No, describing a constitution from hell with a monarch as head of state and which affords constitutional rights to NO-ONE not even the right of an elected member of parliament to remain in the parliament chamber as a "democratic solution" is precisely Salmond with "head-up-arse".
Salmond OPPOSES separating Scots from the enemy Queen and so Scottish republicans must oppose him 100%
I bet those leaders of the SNP, have ALL had to swear allegience to the crown, before their party could even become legal. I'm just guessing, but i bet you.
To remove the men who have sworn allegiance to the queen, you have to vote in someone who has sworn allegiance to the queen.
Terrible things happen to people who break allegiences they have sworn on.
And the longer SNP exists, the longer MI5 or 6 get to "chat" with the leaders.
Hitler and his Party were not fascist -- they were Nationalist Socialists. For an idea of what fascism is, look up General Franco and the Spanish.
The idea of a nation is more than simply people -- it is the instruments of the State and the national territory. The monarch is the embodiment of the nation. And besides, Her Majesty the Queen has less power than any President -- far from being a fascist despot She provides a check on power, prevent tyranny from taking the country.
>Hitler and his Party were not fascist -- they were Nationalist Socialists
Careful, that's what they called themselves for practical purposes. They said what they needed to say in order to get to power. The BNP for exmaple also emphasise an alliance with the working class, but still border on fascism. Hitler was certainly fascist, amongst other things.
The Declaration of Arbroath devoutly defends the Divine Right of Kings, it simply adds a caveat about the right of Scots to oust a monarch early and replace a suitable person from the line of succession. It in no way advocates republicanism.
Yeh well read your translation of the Declaration of Arbroath again malcolmsh and you see that any presumed King of Scotland is out of the job if he behaves like a fascist.
I've explained in my webpage why Scottish Republicans need to be claiming the lion rampant for ourselves as patriots and denying it to Queen & royalists as traitors.
See the link to
The functions and duties of a Scottish National Standard Bearer
As a matter of fact, I did read it again and to my surprise I found the contrary -- a document advocating Scottish nationhood, and what is fascism if not nationalist? If you stand by the Declaration of Arbroath so much then you would clearly be a monarchist, since such it is so defended therein.
The Royal Lion Rampant is the personal property of Her Majesty the Queen, what you suggest is just another republican theft.
The Earl of Dundee is Bearer of the Royal Banner (such as it is) not you
malcolmsh - Deary me, you HAVE got a lot to learn.
The nation is the people. So nationalism is standing up for the people. Fascism is obeying the state authority - with unquestioning, unconscionable obedience to the head of state, monarch or dictator.
Fascists typically attack and betray the nation - persecuting nationals.
Example, Hitler set up camps to exterminate Germans he didn't like.
Despite claiming to be "nationalists" in fact the Nazis went to war against the German nation.
malcolmsh - Well remember that republicanism is a evolution from monarchism, democratising the procedure to select the head of state, now known as a "president" rather than a "King" and introducing constitutional rights for the people.
The Declaration of Arbroath introduces democratic elements
* the choice of King - by the nation, NOT by the King's force majeure nor divine right
and
* rights for the nation
and therefore represents a significant step towards a republicanism.
I have today updated the link in (More info) to my "The functions and duties of a Scottish National Standard Bearer" page wherein I state the claim of Scottish republicans to the Lion Rampant, in respect of the political and military functions of a standard bearer.
Actually, long before now, the Lion Rampant has been reclaimed by the Scottish nation and is commonly carried and displayed at sporting events by Scottish fans.
The Foe of Scots, Elizabeth, has no just right to this flag.
The actions of Graham of Claverhouse, the 1st "Viscount of Dundee" in persecuting Presbyterian Scots for their beliefs were those of an enemy of Scots.
Therefore the King whom Graham served must have been an enemy of Scots, not the true King of Scots, with no rights to say who should be the bearer of the royal standard.
Bloody Clavers was a murderer pure and simple and the Devil Dundee's successors' house Birkhill Castle, we Scottish patriots may assume to be a house of murderers too.
The Viscount Dundee was a Jacobite, and thus fighting against the ancestors of Her Majesty the Queen. In suggesting that he is an enemy of the Scots, you must surely be attesting yourself to support of the reigning dynasty. Learn your history.
Her Majesty the Queen has as much right to the Royal Lion Rampant as you do to your surname.
As an English Nationalist I hope that the SNP can "break through" to become the largest party at the next general election. So come on Scottish Nationalists at the next general election mobilise all the support you can! I estimate it just takes around a 5% swing in your favour for independence to happen.England will be more at ease without an unhappy partner.Also an independent Scotland would prosper economically on her own.Ireland has Scotland can.Respectful Regards from an English anti racist
@49wignell "prosper economically on her own.Ireland has"
I do believe you have made a quite massive error of judgment here. Ireland's economy is decimated. Scotland's economy is going strong and is quite safe within the union.
(1) a stupid & cruel protestant monarch, loyal only to their own rule
(2) a stupid and cruel catholic monarch, loyal to the rule of the Pope.
There is a third choice.
(3) Execute or assassinate all kinds of monarch, and then elect presidents of republics as heads of state who are not stupid and cruel and who will serve the people (or else they too will be replaced).
I'm sorry, but this is exactly why I can't believe in democracy. People like you, who have NO understanding of who the Stuarts were, and who advocate the MURDER of every monarch in the world. You barbarian scum. It is sad to see a Scot think like this. What ever happened to the Jacobites? Oh, that's right, they got BRAINWASHED by the English. Educate yourself, man! Learn who the Stuarts REALLY WERE! How you can prefer selfish politicians to these men, I'll never understand.
Well the British knew how to defeat Goebbels, the Nazis and liberate Norway - where you say you are from. (OK we got needed help from the Americans and other allies too)
So why "laugh-along-with-the-ghost-of-Goebbels"? You are not some kind of Quisling are you?
I will "block user" any neo-Nazi from my comments.
Also see my Peter Dow TV group - 93 propaganda videos!
Though I don't like Salmond, it is still not nice to call him a fascist. His Government does not breathe without the Greens acting as the Kingmaker. Greens=PC (so no fascism then)
What is "not nice" is living under a fascist state supported by the likes of Salmond.
And clearly Salmond is a facsist when he does not support even free speech and the right to protest in parliament by elected members of parliament. Very fascistic.
If we speak of tyranny, look at Stalin. Then realise this: The Queen has an efficiency problem, and will never become a proper tyrant. In the meanwhile, Gordon Brown (yeah...the one from Dunfirmline) will wreck enough...forget it. He has done enough.
If it wasn't for the idiots in the BBC supporting the royals every other day and brainwashing some daft Scots and English then we would have got shot of the Queen and her family long ago.
MaNarchicDRAKE - you are quite right to deny that she is the "English" Queen. I have often corrected my fellow Scots about that.
The English never voted her in and neither did the Scots. We don't get a vote to get rid of the Queen so send the military to arrest or assassinate her.
Lenin was a syphillis case, but Stalin managed to kill 30 million people, and have an arms system named after him. Stalin did not manage to rid his country of the likes of Abrohamovitch.
Cromwell should have gone the full mile, or there is no point in being a dictator. You should secure the future of your descendants, but he was unable to provide a future for his son (as a dictator).
I think Alex supporting the monarchy is the only thing I agree with him on! lol
I love the Queen, she's brilliant :D
And I think the SSP were out of order when they protested in the Parliament a few years ago, I think they were right to be banned for that time, because they were out of order.
Jamandell - You seem to have a royalist fascist idea of order.
Democracy means "government by ALL the people" (not "dictatorship by the majority").
So a true democrat would support the right of all elected MSPs to stay in parliament and would consider the dictating majority of MSPs trying to exclude the minority as "out of order".
A good republican like me wants to defend such constitutional rights (which we should have and which shouldn't ever be voted away).
Yes, it should be government by all the people. However extreme-lefties seem to interprete that as government by THEIR people and their way. There's a much bigger silent majority than there is of the vocal minority.
Well an MSP and those who elected him or her, are denied being part of the government when they are put out of the parliament like a dog.
Democratic order allows protest and government by all. It is not extreme.
The ordered silence imposed by Queen and state in Scotland is extremely fascist, is monarchy and is not government by all the people. It is government by Salmond, and all Scots suffer.
Well the Queen is really in the way of establishing Scottish and British republics and having elected Presidents as heads of state, who could ensure the state was defending people's right to speak out, instead of silencing them.
No doubt you trust the Queen and her officers as much as did Jean Charles de Menezes, until just before he was shot dead by the Queen's police.
Clearly, as head of state, the Queen is at fault when police officers of the state murder innocents, and doubly at fault, when the police don't get punished for their murders.
Clear, anyway, to those who are not so stupid that they are easily brainwashed by the BBC royal correspondents etc. into supporting the UK, monarchy and the Windsors, against the best interests of the people.
Democracy is NOT popular dictatorship. pc0sence, you seem to be confusing an elected dictatorship with democracy. Many people confuse elections with democracy. Elections are necessary for a true democracy but not sufficient.
Nothing gets done when the best leaders, such as myself, are barred from government, and instead we get the royalist status quo and incompetence of Salmond.
As an American, I'm as constitutionally republican as peter. The only reason people liked the royal wedding is because it was a spectacle. We think shiny things are really cool. If you got rid of the queen, we'd find other shiny things to occupy ourselves. My personal perspective is that my great great great great grandfather didn't die in the mud so that his descendants could swoon over the royal family. But there is a question of what's politically possible, isn't there? What say you, Scots?
QuietReckoning 3 months ago
Alex talks hypocritical shit. He KNOWS why he needs to keep the monarchy but he's just not telling the scottish people the truth. He should have his arse kicked out of this country. Secondly, he felt justified in his challenge to authority did he? It would have to be said (though he would refuse to acknowledge it being the little prat he is) that anyone would RIGHTLY be pissed off at being PUNISHED by "authority" for challenging that "authority". He's illegitimate and a liar.
Earthlinggb 6 months ago
@Earthlinggb Neither the Scots nor the Britons NEED the monarchy. It is imposed upon us and most are brainwashed to like the Queen etc by the state broadcasting (BBC etc) endlessly promoting the royals.
Salmond should certainly have his arsed kicked out of Bute House and the Scottish government but we should leave the Scottish voters to kick him out of the Scottish parliament which republican broadcasting could encourage.
It is the Queen's arse which needs to be kicked out of this country.
ScottishRepublican 6 months ago
@Earthlinggb You are invited to discuss Salmond's treachery etc in the For Freedom Forums, for robust political debate, inspired by Scots, open to all at FIGH.TK
ScottishRepublican 6 months ago
@ScotishRepublican Who do you think will win in the scotish elections this year? I think the SNP will, you?
cameranzo1 1 year ago
@cameranzo1 I think the Queen will win and the Scots will lose for the simple reason that the elections will be rigged by the kingdom's control of broadcasting which will only allow those loyal to the Queen on TV to any great extent.
The Queen will certainly win if the SNP win because the SNP under Salmond have a unionist policy of keeping Scotland subjugated under the union crown, united kingdoms and retaining the Queen as head of state.
Unless the Queen dies 1st then King Charles'll win
ScottishRepublican 1 year ago
@cameranzo1 Therefore although free and fair elections would be "Scottish" elections, because the elections are going to be rigged against the Scots the rigged elections will actually be "anti-Scottish" not "Scottish".
ScottishRepublican 1 year ago
Jesus, why is everyone in Scotland so aggressive? We're all UK. Let's keep it that way! Stronger together, weaker apart.
wo0fuk 1 year ago
@wo0fuk I am Peter Dow, ScottishRepublican, the guy asking the question in this radio phone-in programme and "everyone in Scotland" is not as aggressive as I am, neither are the two Queen's Scottie lap dogs, Salmond and Robertson, speaking in this video.
The "UK" means the kingdom, not us, not all of the people. The UK is a state, ruled by few not the many.
The UK & crown keeps us together only in chains and subjugation, we would be stronger breaking free to come to each other's aid.
ScottishRepublican 1 year ago
Wow! I never knew that you spoke with the First Minister. You know how hard it was for me to get an appointment with Alex Salmond--nearly impossible.
I take my hat off to you, you stood toe to toe with Alex Salmond, and you did great.
pluto4847 1 year ago
I have a question for you Mr Dow! come the Independence vote will you be voting Yes or No?
Englishjustice66 1 year ago 2
Englishjustice66 - Well I will vote "YES" for independence of course but
(a) if we vote "YES" they''ll try to deny us independence by insisting on Queen Elizabeth and the Union of the Crowns - with no republic and no president there'll be NO independence.
(b) if Scots vote "NO" I won't accept slavery under the United Kingdom, rejecting nonsense about a "once in a generation vote".
(c) The republican army should REMOVE/KILL the Queen if she comes to Scotland NOW & WHATEVER the vote.
ScottishRepublican 1 year ago
If the snp can bring the ref, and we get part independence then we can go for fully seprate state.. let salmond play his wee game then hel see what needs done..
spr65 2 years ago 2
spr65 - The SNP have left the referendum to Salmond who has accepted the UK civil servants' plan for a referendum which DENIES Scottish national independence and instead authorises an "independent" Queen's Scottish state to oppress or murder any free Scot.
Salmond's wee game is a state under his authority which will eliminate his political opposition including YOU if he needs to.
Do you want to be enslaved or exterminated by royalist fascists?
No? Then oppose Salmond now while we can.
ScottishRepublican 2 years ago
Describing Salmond, of all people, as "royalist fascist" sounds a bit head-up-arse. Salmond is acquiescent to royalty, because his priority is Scottish separation, and wants to draw support from royalists and republicans alike. If Salmond is a fascist, then all I can say is that almost all world politicians are fascists and the word loses all meaning.
inkstersco 3 years ago 17
inkstersco - No, describing a constitution from hell with a monarch as head of state and which affords constitutional rights to NO-ONE not even the right of an elected member of parliament to remain in the parliament chamber as a "democratic solution" is precisely Salmond with "head-up-arse".
Salmond OPPOSES separating Scots from the enemy Queen and so Scottish republicans must oppose him 100%
Fascist politicians define themselves by excluding protesting MPs, denying free speech.
ScottishRepublican 2 years ago
That's your freedom of speech, Scottish style, Peter.
chrisdahms 3 years ago
I hope you all get freedom, i really do.
and if you do, i hope you let a few of us escape northwards before u close the borders.
mikeybrumbrum 3 years ago
I bet those leaders of the SNP, have ALL had to swear allegience to the crown, before their party could even become legal. I'm just guessing, but i bet you.
To remove the men who have sworn allegiance to the queen, you have to vote in someone who has sworn allegiance to the queen.
Terrible things happen to people who break allegiences they have sworn on.
And the longer SNP exists, the longer MI5 or 6 get to "chat" with the leaders.
Imagine if MI5 said "obey us, or you all die"
mikeybrumbrum 3 years ago
I wouldn't call myself patriotic but I do believe in the break up of The United Kingdom.
The one thing this nation badly needs is a pro independence socialist republican alternative to the snp.
pwjonny 3 years ago
Hitler and his Party were not fascist -- they were Nationalist Socialists. For an idea of what fascism is, look up General Franco and the Spanish.
The idea of a nation is more than simply people -- it is the instruments of the State and the national territory. The monarch is the embodiment of the nation. And besides, Her Majesty the Queen has less power than any President -- far from being a fascist despot She provides a check on power, prevent tyranny from taking the country.
malcolmsh 3 years ago 6
>Hitler and his Party were not fascist -- they were Nationalist Socialists
Careful, that's what they called themselves for practical purposes. They said what they needed to say in order to get to power. The BNP for exmaple also emphasise an alliance with the working class, but still border on fascism. Hitler was certainly fascist, amongst other things.
~
northanortha 3 years ago 3
The Declaration of Arbroath devoutly defends the Divine Right of Kings, it simply adds a caveat about the right of Scots to oust a monarch early and replace a suitable person from the line of succession. It in no way advocates republicanism.
malcolmsh 3 years ago 9
BonnieBlueFlag1314 - Well from your channel I see that you are a supporter of Irish Republicans.
Well Scottish Republicans are kind of like Irish Republicans - we are not going away, you know?
Don't you remember when Gerry Adams said that about the IRA - that they haven't gone away, you know?
Republicans can do many things - we can fight, we can die, but just going away is not one of them.
ScottishRepublican 3 years ago
It is amusingly ironic that the chap is sitting beneath the Royal Lion Rampant while deriding the Queen as fascist.
malcolmsh 3 years ago 3
Yeh well read your translation of the Declaration of Arbroath again malcolmsh and you see that any presumed King of Scotland is out of the job if he behaves like a fascist.
I've explained in my webpage why Scottish Republicans need to be claiming the lion rampant for ourselves as patriots and denying it to Queen & royalists as traitors.
See the link to
The functions and duties of a Scottish National Standard Bearer
in the About This Video (more) details.
ScottishRepublican 3 years ago
As a matter of fact, I did read it again and to my surprise I found the contrary -- a document advocating Scottish nationhood, and what is fascism if not nationalist? If you stand by the Declaration of Arbroath so much then you would clearly be a monarchist, since such it is so defended therein.
The Royal Lion Rampant is the personal property of Her Majesty the Queen, what you suggest is just another republican theft.
The Earl of Dundee is Bearer of the Royal Banner (such as it is) not you
malcolmsh 3 years ago
malcolmsh - Deary me, you HAVE got a lot to learn.
The nation is the people. So nationalism is standing up for the people. Fascism is obeying the state authority - with unquestioning, unconscionable obedience to the head of state, monarch or dictator.
Fascists typically attack and betray the nation - persecuting nationals.
Example, Hitler set up camps to exterminate Germans he didn't like.
Despite claiming to be "nationalists" in fact the Nazis went to war against the German nation.
ScottishRepublican 3 years ago
malcolmsh - Well remember that republicanism is a evolution from monarchism, democratising the procedure to select the head of state, now known as a "president" rather than a "King" and introducing constitutional rights for the people.
The Declaration of Arbroath introduces democratic elements
* the choice of King - by the nation, NOT by the King's force majeure nor divine right
and
* rights for the nation
and therefore represents a significant step towards a republicanism.
ScottishRepublican 3 years ago
I have today updated the link in (More info) to my "The functions and duties of a Scottish National Standard Bearer" page wherein I state the claim of Scottish republicans to the Lion Rampant, in respect of the political and military functions of a standard bearer.
Actually, long before now, the Lion Rampant has been reclaimed by the Scottish nation and is commonly carried and displayed at sporting events by Scottish fans.
The Foe of Scots, Elizabeth, has no just right to this flag.
ScottishRepublican 3 years ago
The actions of Graham of Claverhouse, the 1st "Viscount of Dundee" in persecuting Presbyterian Scots for their beliefs were those of an enemy of Scots.
Therefore the King whom Graham served must have been an enemy of Scots, not the true King of Scots, with no rights to say who should be the bearer of the royal standard.
Bloody Clavers was a murderer pure and simple and the Devil Dundee's successors' house Birkhill Castle, we Scottish patriots may assume to be a house of murderers too.
ScottishRepublican 3 years ago
The Viscount Dundee was a Jacobite, and thus fighting against the ancestors of Her Majesty the Queen. In suggesting that he is an enemy of the Scots, you must surely be attesting yourself to support of the reigning dynasty. Learn your history.
Her Majesty the Queen has as much right to the Royal Lion Rampant as you do to your surname.
malcolmsh 3 years ago 7
As an English Nationalist I hope that the SNP can "break through" to become the largest party at the next general election. So come on Scottish Nationalists at the next general election mobilise all the support you can! I estimate it just takes around a 5% swing in your favour for independence to happen.England will be more at ease without an unhappy partner.Also an independent Scotland would prosper economically on her own.Ireland has Scotland can.Respectful Regards from an English anti racist
49wignell 3 years ago
@49wignell "prosper economically on her own.Ireland has"
I do believe you have made a quite massive error of judgment here. Ireland's economy is decimated. Scotland's economy is going strong and is quite safe within the union.
NumberDne 9 months ago
The choice for the people is wider than -
(1) a stupid & cruel protestant monarch, loyal only to their own rule
(2) a stupid and cruel catholic monarch, loyal to the rule of the Pope.
There is a third choice.
(3) Execute or assassinate all kinds of monarch, and then elect presidents of republics as heads of state who are not stupid and cruel and who will serve the people (or else they too will be replaced).
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
That was a reply to a comment about the Stuart Kings which I removed by mistake.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
I'm sorry, but this is exactly why I can't believe in democracy. People like you, who have NO understanding of who the Stuarts were, and who advocate the MURDER of every monarch in the world. You barbarian scum. It is sad to see a Scot think like this. What ever happened to the Jacobites? Oh, that's right, they got BRAINWASHED by the English. Educate yourself, man! Learn who the Stuarts REALLY WERE! How you can prefer selfish politicians to these men, I'll never understand.
yeahbuddy2 4 years ago 3
If Göbbels had seen this, he would have a good laugh. The British have no idea on propaganda.
pc0sence 4 years ago
Well the British knew how to defeat Goebbels, the Nazis and liberate Norway - where you say you are from. (OK we got needed help from the Americans and other allies too)
So why "laugh-along-with-the-ghost-of-Goebbels"? You are not some kind of Quisling are you?
I will "block user" any neo-Nazi from my comments.
Also see my Peter Dow TV group - 93 propaganda videos!
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
I should agree that Sean Connery looks a bit like a right-winger.
pc0sence 4 years ago
Though I don't like Salmond, it is still not nice to call him a fascist. His Government does not breathe without the Greens acting as the Kingmaker. Greens=PC (so no fascism then)
pc0sence 4 years ago
What is "not nice" is living under a fascist state supported by the likes of Salmond.
And clearly Salmond is a facsist when he does not support even free speech and the right to protest in parliament by elected members of parliament. Very fascistic.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
Bloody Scots, if you hate the rest of us British so much. Get your Bloody Scottish Prime Minister off his post and go give him a job up North.
Mattythewelshman 4 years ago
Well look Matty. I don't hate the rest of the British just those who expect us to live like slaves under Queen Elizabeth.
But as a proud Scot I see it as primarily the duty of the Scots to free ourselves from the Queen's tyranny.
I never blame the English or Welsh for forcing the Queen down our throat.
The Scottish supporters of the Queen - like that idiot Prime Minister Gordon Brown - are the people I really blame and hate.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
If we speak of tyranny, look at Stalin. Then realise this: The Queen has an efficiency problem, and will never become a proper tyrant. In the meanwhile, Gordon Brown (yeah...the one from Dunfirmline) will wreck enough...forget it. He has done enough.
pc0sence 4 years ago
Oh, and she's the Queen of Scots as well
Jamandell 4 years ago
FUck does he support the english queen. FUCK SAKE!!!
I just lost alooot oif respect for him
16416408 4 years ago
Shes some german fucker or reptile depending on what you believe. We hate her in England too
MaNarchicDRAKE 4 years ago
If it wasn't for the idiots in the BBC supporting the royals every other day and brainwashing some daft Scots and English then we would have got shot of the Queen and her family long ago.
MaNarchicDRAKE - you are quite right to deny that she is the "English" Queen. I have often corrected my fellow Scots about that.
The English never voted her in and neither did the Scots. We don't get a vote to get rid of the Queen so send the military to arrest or assassinate her.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
As for the military assassinating the Monarch, the English have already tried that. It happened in 1649, and then Cromwell came along.
pc0sence 4 years ago
And we all know the good that Cromwell did for England! (yeah right!) Its a good thing the English brought back the monarchy in 1660.
yeahbuddy2 4 years ago 2
True. I know it was the Stuarts, but still better.
pc0sence 4 years ago
Maybe Cromwell was too soft? He doesn't seem to have wiped out the royalist class, like the Russian and French republican revolutions did.
Can't really do much by killing only the King, when a whole class of royalists want to impose another monarch as soon as your back is turned.
Sure, start with the Queen, as the figure head, then get methodical ..
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
Lenin was a syphillis case, but Stalin managed to kill 30 million people, and have an arms system named after him. Stalin did not manage to rid his country of the likes of Abrohamovitch.
pc0sence 4 years ago
Cromwell should have gone the full mile, or there is no point in being a dictator. You should secure the future of your descendants, but he was unable to provide a future for his son (as a dictator).
pc0sence 4 years ago
And I thought the BBC were all PC.
pc0sence 4 years ago
I think Alex supporting the monarchy is the only thing I agree with him on! lol
I love the Queen, she's brilliant :D
And I think the SSP were out of order when they protested in the Parliament a few years ago, I think they were right to be banned for that time, because they were out of order.
Jamandell 4 years ago 3
Jamandell - You seem to have a royalist fascist idea of order.
Democracy means "government by ALL the people" (not "dictatorship by the majority").
So a true democrat would support the right of all elected MSPs to stay in parliament and would consider the dictating majority of MSPs trying to exclude the minority as "out of order".
A good republican like me wants to defend such constitutional rights (which we should have and which shouldn't ever be voted away).
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
Yes, it should be government by all the people. However extreme-lefties seem to interprete that as government by THEIR people and their way. There's a much bigger silent majority than there is of the vocal minority.
Jamandell 4 years ago 3
Well an MSP and those who elected him or her, are denied being part of the government when they are put out of the parliament like a dog.
Democratic order allows protest and government by all. It is not extreme.
The ordered silence imposed by Queen and state in Scotland is extremely fascist, is monarchy and is not government by all the people. It is government by Salmond, and all Scots suffer.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
You'll find the Queen has no real power to silence anyone. But I'd trust her to run the country more than any Tory, Labour or SNP leader.
Jamandell 4 years ago 4
Well the Queen is really in the way of establishing Scottish and British republics and having elected Presidents as heads of state, who could ensure the state was defending people's right to speak out, instead of silencing them.
No doubt you trust the Queen and her officers as much as did Jean Charles de Menezes, until just before he was shot dead by the Queen's police.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
Yes, because the shooting of Jean Charles De Menezes was clearly the Queen's fault?
Jamandell 4 years ago
Clearly, as head of state, the Queen is at fault when police officers of the state murder innocents, and doubly at fault, when the police don't get punished for their murders.
Clear, anyway, to those who are not so stupid that they are easily brainwashed by the BBC royal correspondents etc. into supporting the UK, monarchy and the Windsors, against the best interests of the people.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
I'm happy to be brainwashed, God Save the Queen!
Jamandell 4 years ago
Democracy IS a popular dictatorship. How will you ever get anything done at all?
pc0sence 4 years ago
Democracy is NOT popular dictatorship. pc0sence, you seem to be confusing an elected dictatorship with democracy. Many people confuse elections with democracy. Elections are necessary for a true democracy but not sufficient.
Nothing gets done when the best leaders, such as myself, are barred from government, and instead we get the royalist status quo and incompetence of Salmond.
ScottishRepublican 4 years ago
Its all about you. I know you make a great figurehead...for not making election reforms.
PS: It's the Greens who are the Kingmakers to Salmonds favour.
pc0sence 4 years ago
Italy has a multi-representation in their Parliament. But it does not mean I envy them.
pc0sence 4 years ago